Counting number fields using multiple Dirichlet series
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:47 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Multiple Dirichlet series count number fields with fixed Galois groups ordered by inertial invariants.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We provide a method for counting number fields of fixed Galois group ordered by arbitrary inertial invariants using analytic techniques from the study of multiple Dirichlet series. We prove unconditional results for infinitely many new concentrated and semiconcentrated groups. Conditional on subconvexity bounds, asymptotic growth rates hold for infinitely many new groups G where minimum index elements lie in unions of proper abelian normal subgroups, including all nilpotency class 2 groups, and power saving errors apply when G is nilpotent.
What carries the argument
Multiple Dirichlet series encoding the inertial invariants of the Galois extensions.
If this is right
- Unconditional counting results hold for infinitely many new concentrated and semiconcentrated groups.
- Conditional asymptotic growth rates exist for groups with minimum index elements in unions of abelian normal subgroups.
- All groups of nilpotency class 2 admit conditional asymptotics.
- Nilpotent groups receive power saving error terms in the counts.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- This analytic method could be adapted to count extensions ordered by other arithmetic invariants.
- Improved bounds on Dirichlet series growth would convert more conditional results to unconditional ones.
- The results suggest that similar series constructions may resolve counting problems for additional classes of Galois groups.
Load-bearing premise
Subconvexity bounds hold for the multiple Dirichlet series associated to the Galois groups.
What would settle it
Numerical evidence that the number of G-extensions for a nilpotency class 2 group grows at a different rate than predicted would disprove the conditional claim.
Figures
read the original abstract
We provide a method for counting number fields of fixed Galois group ordered by arbitrary inertial invariants using analytic techniques from the study of multiple Dirichlet series. We prove unconditional results for infinitely many new (concentrated and semiconcentrated) groups that were not approachable by previous methods. Conditional on subconvexity bounds bounds for certain Dirichlet series (e.g. the generalized Lindel\"of hypothesis), we use these techniques to prove the existence of an asymptotic growth rate for $G$-extensions for infinitely many new groups $G$ for which the minimum index elements of $G$ are contained in a union of proper abelian normal subgroups. In particular, our conditional results include all groups with nilpotency class $2$. Additionally, when $G$ is nilpotent our results give a power saving error term.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper develops a method based on multiple Dirichlet series to count number fields with fixed Galois group G, ordered by arbitrary inertial invariants. It establishes unconditional asymptotic formulas for infinitely many new concentrated and semiconcentrated groups not reachable by prior techniques. Conditionally on subconvexity bounds (such as the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis) for certain Dirichlet series, it obtains asymptotics for infinitely many additional groups whose minimal-index elements lie in a union of proper abelian normal subgroups, including all groups of nilpotency class 2. When G is nilpotent the method yields a power-saving error term.
Significance. If the analytic derivations and error-term estimates hold, the work meaningfully enlarges the set of Galois groups admitting counting theorems, both unconditionally and under standard subconvexity hypotheses. The separation of unconditional results for concentrated/semiconcentrated groups from conditional results for a broader class (including all class-2 nilpotents) is a clear strength, as is the power-saving error term for nilpotent G. The approach via multiple Dirichlet series supplies a new technical route that avoids some limitations of earlier methods.
minor comments (2)
- Abstract, line 3: the phrase 'subconvexity bounds bounds' contains a duplicated word; this should be corrected for clarity.
- The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement, early in the introduction, of the precise inertial invariants used to order the extensions, together with a short comparison table listing which groups fall into the unconditional, conditional, and previously known categories.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive summary and significance assessment of our manuscript, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report, so we have no individual points to address point-by-point. We remain available to incorporate any minor editorial or presentational changes the editor or referee may suggest in a revised version.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation relies on external analytic methods
full rationale
The paper applies established techniques from the study of multiple Dirichlet series to count G-extensions ordered by inertial invariants. Unconditional results are claimed for concentrated and semiconcentrated groups, while conditional results explicitly invoke external subconvexity bounds (e.g., generalized Lindelöf hypothesis) as a hypothesis rather than deriving them internally. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the stated claims or abstract. The power-saving error term for nilpotent G is presented as a consequence of the method under the stated conditions, with no reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
[AB] Brandon Alberts and Alina Bucur. Magma code related to this paper.https://github.com/ brandonalbertsmath/Counting-Number-Fields-Using-Multiple-Dirichlet-Series. [AK21] Brandon Alberts and Jack Klys. The distribution ofH 8-extensions of quadratic fields.Inter- national Mathematics Research Notices, 2021(2):1508–1572,
work page 2021
-
[2]
Power savings for counting (twisted) abelian extensions of number fields
[Alb24] Brandon Alberts. Power savings for counting (twisted) abelian extensions of number fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03475,
-
[3]
[AO21] Brandon Alberts and Evan O’Dorney
Preprint available athttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18574. [AO21] Brandon Alberts and Evan O’Dorney. Harmonic analysis and statistics of the first Galois cohomology group.Research in the Mathematical Sciences, 8(3),
-
[4]
[Bai80] Andrew Marc Baily. On the density of discriminants of quartic fields.Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 1980(315):190–210,
work page 1980
-
[5]
[BFSLV24] Alina Bucur, Alexandra Florea, Allechar Serrano L´ opez, and Ila Varma. Power-saving error terms for the number ofD 4-quartic extensions over a number field ordered by discriminant. InResearch directions in number theory. Women in numbers V. Proceedings of the WIN5 workshop. Banff, Alberta, Canada, November 15–20, 2020, pages 197–218. Cham: Springer,
work page 2020
-
[6]
Preprint available athttps://arxiv. org/abs/1512.03035. [BTT23] Manjul Bhargava, Takashi Taniguchi, and Frank Thorne. Improved error estimates for the davenport–heilbronn theorems.Mathematische Annalen, Oct
-
[7]
Twisted Malle’s conjecture.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16770,
[Cho25] Tanav Choudhary. Twisted Malle’s conjecture.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16770,
- [8]
-
[9]
[DW88] Boris Datskovsky and David J
[Online; accessed 30 June 2025]. [DW88] Boris Datskovsky and David J. Wright. Density of discriminants of cubic extensions.Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, pages 116–138,
work page 2025
-
[10]
Malle’s conjecture for nonic Heisenberg extensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09465,
[FK21] ´Etienne Fouvry and Peter Koymans. Malle’s conjecture for nonic Heisenberg extensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09465,
-
[11]
A secondary term forD 4 quartic fields ordered by conductor.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03982,
[Fri21] Matthew Friedrichsen. A secondary term forD 4 quartic fields ordered by conductor.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03982,
-
[12]
Malle’s conjecture with multiple invariants.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16698,
[Gun22] Fabian Gundlach. Malle’s conjecture with multiple invariants.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16698,
-
[13]
CountingD 4-field extensions by multi-invariants.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12342,
[HZ25] Willem Hansen and Anna Zanoli. CountingD 4-field extensions by multi-invariants.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12342,
-
[14]
[Online; accessed 30 June 2025]. [Mal02] Gunter Malle. On the distribution of Galois groups.Journal of Number Theory, 92(2):315–329,
work page 2025
-
[15]
Malle’s conjecture forGˆA, with G“S 3, S4, S5.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04651,
[MTTW20] Riad Masri, Frank Thorne, Wei-Lun Tsai, and Jiuya Wang. Malle’s conjecture forGˆA, with G“S 3, S4, S5.arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04651,
-
[16]
A guide to Tauberian theorems for arithmetic applications
[PTBZ25] Lillian B Pierce, Caroline L Turnage-Butterbaugh, and Asif Zaman. A guide to Tauberian theorems for arithmetic applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16233,
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[17]
[PY23] Ian Petrow and Matthew P Young. The fourth moment of Dirichlet L-functions along a coset and the Weyl bound.Duke Mathematical Journal, 172(10):1879–1960,
work page 1960
-
[19]
Preprint available athttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23690. [Wan17] Jiuya Wang. Secondary term of asymptotic distribution ofS 3 ˆAextensions overQ, Oct
-
[20]
Secondary Term of Asymptotic Distribution of $S_3\times A$ Extensions over $\mathbb{Q}$
Preprint available athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10693. [Wan21] Jiuya Wang. Malle’s conjecture forS n ˆAforn“3,4,5.Compositio Mathematica, 157(1):83–121,
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[21]
Counterexamples for T¨ urkelli’s modification on Malle’s conjecture.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04261,
[Wan25] Jiuya Wang. Counterexamples for T¨ urkelli’s modification on Malle’s conjecture.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04261,
-
[22]
[Yan23] Liyang Yang. Relative trace formula and twistedL-functions: the Burgess bound.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10719, 2023
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.