pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.01760 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Experimental engineering of Floquet topological phases in a one-dimensional optical lattice

Pengju Zhao , Yudong Wei , Zhongshu Hu , Shengjie Jin , Xuzong Chen , Xiong-jun Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Floquet topological phasesoptical latticeanomalous Floquet topologymulti-frequency drivinggap windingss-p orbital couplingsband inversion surfaceRamsey protocol
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Multi-frequency driving with tunable phase engineers anomalous Floquet phases in one-dimensional optical lattices

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper experimentally realizes a one-dimensional anomalous Floquet topological phase by applying periodic driving to an optical lattice. A lattice-depth modulation scheme creates staggered s-p orbital couplings that produce minimal nontrivial topology under single-tone driving. Adding a second driving tone lets its relative phase set the sign structure of the windings around the zero and pi quasienergy gaps so the windings either reinforce each other or cancel while keeping the phase nontrivial. A band-inversion-surface resolved Ramsey protocol assisted by lattice shaking directly measures the resulting (W0, Wπ) pair. This approach demonstrates a quantitative method for engineering topological phases that exist only under periodic driving.

Core claim

A lattice-depth modulation scheme induces staggered nearest-neighbor s-p orbital couplings that realize minimal nontrivial Floquet topology under single-tone driving; introducing a second tone whose relative phase controls the effective coupling signs in the 0 and π gaps tunes the windings (W0, Wπ) to either add for a high-winding phase or cancel while retaining nontrivial gap indices, with the pair read out by a band-inversion-surface-resolved Ramsey protocol assisted by lattice-position shaking.

What carries the argument

Lattice-depth modulation that induces staggered nearest-neighbor s-p orbital couplings, with the relative phase of a second driving tone controlling the sign structure of the (W0, Wπ) gap windings, read out by a band-inversion-surface (BIS)-resolved Ramsey protocol.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice-depth modulation induces the intended staggered nearest-neighbor s-p orbital couplings without significant unwanted heating, decoherence, or higher-order effects that would obscure the topological signatures in the measured windings.

What would settle it

If the measured (W0, Wπ) windings extracted from the band-inversion-surface Ramsey protocol do not match the values predicted from the relative phase of the second tone, the claim of controlled tuning collapses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.01760 by Pengju Zhao, Shengjie Jin, Xiong-jun Liu, Xuzong Chen, Yudong Wei, Zhongshu Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Topology from lattice-depth modulation (LDM) and the corresponding Floquet band structures for single- and two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Ramsey detection of the single-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Measurement of the dynamics at the topological [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Periodic driving enables realization of topological phases without static counterparts. We experimentally realize and detect a one-dimensional anomalous Floquet topological phase in an optical lattice, using multi-frequency control to manipulate the relative sign structure of the gap windings $(W_0,W_\pi)$ associated with the $0$ and $\pi$ quasienergy gaps. We develop a lattice-depth modulation scheme that induces staggered nearest-neighbor $s$-$p$ orbital couplings and realize a minimal nontrivial Floquet topology under single-tone driving. Introducing a second tone, its relative phase controls the effective coupling signs in the $0$ and $\pi$ gaps, thereby tuning the corresponding windings to add and produce a high-winding phase or to cancel while retaining nontrivial gap indices. We read out $(W_0,W_\pi)$ with a band-inversion-surface (BIS)-resolved Ramsey protocol assisted by lattice-position shaking, which measures relative Floquet phases on the BISs. Controlled quenches further confirm phase-dependent band modifications even at quasimomenta far from resonance. These results establish multi-frequency control with a tunable relative phase as a quantitative route to engineering anomalous Floquet topology, and demonstrate phase-coherent coexistence of distinct drive modalities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental realization of a one-dimensional anomalous Floquet topological phase in an optical lattice. Using a lattice-depth modulation scheme with single-tone driving, the authors induce staggered s-p orbital couplings to realize a minimal nontrivial Floquet topology. A second tone with tunable relative phase is introduced to control the effective coupling signs in the 0 and π quasienergy gaps, allowing the gap windings (W0, Wπ) to be tuned such that they add (high-winding phase) or cancel while retaining nontrivial indices. The windings are read out using a band-inversion-surface (BIS)-resolved Ramsey protocol assisted by lattice-position shaking, with controlled quenches providing further confirmation of phase-dependent band modifications.

Significance. If the results hold, this establishes multi-frequency driving with controllable relative phase as a quantitative tool for engineering anomalous Floquet topology, including the phase-coherent coexistence of distinct drive modalities. The direct BIS-resolved Ramsey readout of relative Floquet phases provides a clear, falsifiable signature of the gap windings without reliance on fitted parameters. The work addresses the potential concern of higher-order couplings or heating from multi-tone modulation by demonstrating agreement with the minimal model's predicted winding structures; the stress-test issue does not land as a load-bearing problem given the observed topological signatures.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the specific numerical values of (W0, Wπ) for the additive and canceling cases are not stated; including them would improve immediate clarity of the central result.
  2. [§4] The Ramsey protocol description would benefit from an explicit statement of the number of experimental repetitions or averaging used to extract the phase windings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The summary accurately captures our use of multi-frequency driving to control gap windings and the BIS-resolved Ramsey readout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental demonstration of Floquet phases

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on realizing and detecting anomalous Floquet topological phases in a 1D optical lattice via multi-frequency lattice-depth modulation. Central quantities (W0, Wπ gap windings) are obtained directly from BIS-resolved Ramsey measurements of relative Floquet phases, not from any theoretical derivation, fitted parameters, or self-referential equations. The modulation scheme and its intended staggered s-p couplings are validated by the experimental outcomes themselves rather than by construction from prior inputs. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted predictions, or self-citation chains; the work is self-contained as a direct measurement protocol.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Floquet theory for periodically driven lattices and established ultracold-atom techniques; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Floquet theory applies and defines quasienergy gaps with associated winding numbers W0 and Wπ
    Invoked throughout to interpret the driven system's topology.
  • domain assumption The optical lattice and modulation produce effective s-p orbital couplings as intended
    Underlying the staggered coupling scheme described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5527 in / 1356 out tokens · 61030 ms · 2026-05-15T17:27:19.152447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Eckardt, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 011004 (2017)

    A. Eckardt, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 011004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 229 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Weitenberg and J

    C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Nature Physics17, 1342 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Nature496, 196 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Nature515, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Zheng and H

    W. Zheng and H. Zhai, Physical Review A89, 061603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Advances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Eckardt and E

    A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, New Journal of Physics 17, 093039 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Fläschner, B

    N. Fläschner, B. S. Rem, M. Tarnowski, D. Vogel, D.- S. Lühmann, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Science 352, 1091 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    J. K. Asbóth, B. Tarasinski, and P. Delplace, Phys. Rev. B90, 125143 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Nathan and M

    F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, New Journal of Physics17, 125014 (2015). 8

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Carpentier, P

    D. Carpentier, P. Delplace, M. Fruchart, and K. Gawędzki, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 106806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Zhang and X.-J

    L. Zhang and X.-J. Liu, PRX Quantum3, 040312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Leykam, M

    D. Leykam, M. C. Rechtsman, and Y. D. Chong, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 013902 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Nathan, D

    F. Nathan, D. Abanin, E. Berg, N. H. Lindner, and M. S. Rudner, Phys. Rev. B99, 195133 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    L. J. Maczewsky, J. M. Zeuner, S. Nolte, and A. Szameit, Nature communications8, 13756 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Mukherjee, A

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, M. Valiente, E. Andersson, P. Öhberg, N. Goldman, and R. R. Thomson, Nature communications8, 13918 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    C. Chen, X. Ding, J. Qin, J. Wu, Y. He, C.-Y. Lu, L. Li, X.-J. Liu, B. C. Sanders, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 046401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Qin, and R. Fleury, Optical Ma- terials Express15, 828 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Pan, H. Wang, C. Zhang, D. Yu, A. Gover, H. Zhang, T. Li, L. Zhou, and S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    M. Li, C. Li, L. Yan, Q. Li, Q. Gong, and Y. Li, Light: Science & Applications12, 262 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 015005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Bouchoule, R

    I. Bouchoule, R. Citro, T. Duty, T. Giamarchi, R. G. Hulet, M. Klanjšek, E. Orignac, and B. Weber, Nature Reviews Physics7, 565 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Xie, T.-S

    D. Xie, T.-S. Deng, T. Xiao, W. Gou, T. Chen, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 050502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Wintersperger, C

    K. Wintersperger, C. Braun, F. N. Ünal, A. Eckardt, M. D. Liberto, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidels- burger, Nature Physics16, 1058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    M. Lu, G. H. Reid, A. R. Fritsch, A. M. Piñeiro, and I. B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 040402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Zhang, C.-R

    J.-Y. Zhang, C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, R.-H. Jiao, K.-Y. Shi, H. Yuan, W. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Physical Review Letters130, 043201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Zhang, L

    L. Zhang, L. Zhang, and X.-J. Liu, Physical Review Letters125, 183001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    J. H. Kang, J. H. Han, and Y. Shin, New Journal of Physics22, 013023 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Minguzzi, Z

    J. Minguzzi, Z. Zhu, K. Sandholzer, A.-S. Walter, K. Viebahn, and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 053201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Sandholzer, A.-S

    K. Sandholzer, A.-S. Walter, J. Minguzzi, Z. Zhu, K. Viebahn, and T. Esslinger, Physical Review Research 4, 013056 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Kiefer, M

    Y. Kiefer, M. Hachmann, and A. Hemmerich, Nature Physics19, 794 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    V. Venu, P. Xu, M. Mamaev, F. Corapi, T. Bilitewski, J. P. D’Incao, C. J. Fujiwara, A. M. Rey, and J. H. Thywissen, Nature613, 262 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Creutz, Phys

    M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2636 (1999)

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    Sun and L.-K

    N. Sun and L.-K. Lim, Phys. Rev. B96, 035139 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [41]

    For𝑉 0 =3.5𝐸 𝑟 we obtain𝑡 (1) 𝑝 =0.96𝐸 𝑟,𝑡 (2) 𝑝 = 0.14𝐸 𝑟, and𝑡 (3) 𝑝 =0.077𝐸 𝑟

    For a finite lattice depth, the𝑝-band dispersion can be written more accurately as𝜀 𝑝 (𝑘)= Í 𝑛≥1 𝑡 (𝑛) 𝑝 cos(𝑛𝑘 ). For𝑉 0 =3.5𝐸 𝑟 we obtain𝑡 (1) 𝑝 =0.96𝐸 𝑟,𝑡 (2) 𝑝 = 0.14𝐸 𝑟, and𝑡 (3) 𝑝 =0.077𝐸 𝑟. For a single-cosine surro- gate𝜀 𝑝 (𝑘) ≈ ˜𝑡 𝑝 cos𝑘, we match the bandwidth and set ˜𝑡 𝑝 = Í odd𝑛 𝑡 (𝑛) 𝑝 ≈1.04𝐸 𝑟

    work page

  41. [42]

    See Supplementary Materials for additional details

    work page

  42. [43]

    Wang and L

    B.-B. Wang and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A109, 023303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [44]

    B. Song, L. Zhang, C. He, T. F. J. Poon, E. Hajiyev, S. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, and G.-B. Jo, Science Advances4, eaao4748 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [45]

    J. H. Kang and Y.-i. Shin, Phys. Rev. A102, 063315 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Zhang, L

    L. Zhang, L. Zhang, and X.-J. Liu, Physical Review A 100, 063624 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [47]

    X. Li, E. Zhao, and W. Vincent Liu, Nature Communi- cations4, 1523 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [48]

    Jünemann, A

    J. Jünemann, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Lewenstein, M. Rizzi, and A. Bermudez, Phys. Rev. X7, 031057 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [49]

    Rajeevan and S

    G. Rajeevan and S. Mukherjee, (2026), arXiv:2601.08914

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [50]

    Liu, T.-S

    H. Liu, T.-S. Xiong, W. Zhang, and J.-H. An, Physical Review A100, 023622 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [51]

    K. Shi, X. Zhang, and W. Zhang, Physical Review A 109, 013324 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    D. Bae, J. Park, M. Kim, H. Kwak, J. Kwon, and Y. Shin, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [53]

    Ghuneim and R

    M. Ghuneim and R. W. Bomantara, Physical Review B 111, 195424 (2025). 9 Supplementary Materials I. EFFECTIVE HAMIL TONIAN FOR MUL TI-FREQUENCY LA TTICE DEPTH MODULA TION In this section we derive a general effective Hamiltonian for a one-dimensional lattice with multi-harmonic depth modulation (LDM). We start from the continuum Hamiltonian 𝐻(𝑡)= ˆ𝑝2 2𝑚 + ...

    work page 2025