pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04141 · v2 · pith:XIC7PTDXnew · submitted 2026-03-04 · ✦ hep-ex

Experimental Advances on Light Baryon Spectroscopy at BESIII Experiment

Shi Wang , Hao Liu , Shuangshi Fang , Xiongfei Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords baryon spectroscopyBESIIIexcited baryon stateshyperon resonancesmissing resonancesnon-perturbative QCDJ/psi decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

BESIII data from billions of J/psi events reveals new excited states across nucleon and hyperon families.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how the BESIII experiment's large data sets from electron-positron collisions in the tau-charm region have been used to search for light baryon resonances. Analyses of J/psi and psi(3686) decays have turned up new structures interpreted as excited nucleon states along with Lambda, Sigma, Xi, and Omega hyperon states. A sympathetic reader cares because these observations address the long-standing mismatch between quark-model predictions and the limited number of observed baryon resonances. Filling this gap supplies direct experimental input for understanding how the strong force binds quarks at low energies where perturbative methods fail.

Core claim

Recent BESIII analyses of high-statistics samples have identified new resonance states in the spectra of nucleons and hyperons, expanding the known light baryon spectrum and supplying experimental constraints on non-perturbative QCD while helping to resolve the missing-baryon-resonances problem.

What carries the argument

The world's largest data sets in the 1.84-4.95 GeV range, including roughly ten billion J/psi events and three billion psi(3686) events, collected at low background in the tau-charm energy region.

If this is right

  • The new states supply additional data points for testing quark-model and other effective-theory predictions of baryon masses and widths.
  • Improved knowledge of the baryon spectrum constrains non-perturbative QCD calculations and lattice simulations.
  • Confirmation of these resonances narrows the list of still-missing states and guides where to search next.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These experimental anchors could be used to calibrate specific decay-mode predictions for future searches at higher energies.
  • Cross-checks against independent data sets from other facilities would strengthen or weaken the case for each new state.

Load-bearing premise

Peaks observed in invariant-mass distributions correspond to genuine new resonance states rather than statistical fluctuations, interference, or misidentified known particles.

What would settle it

A re-analysis of the same data sets using alternative background models or resonance parameterizations that removes the statistical significance of the reported structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04141 by Hao Liu, Shi Wang, Shuangshi Fang, Xiongfei Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the BESIII detector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dalitz plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dalitz plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dalitz plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Based on the likelihood differences between fits with and without the Σ(1380)+ resonance, the statistical signifi￾cances were found to be 6.1σ for model A and 3.3σ for model B. Table III summarized the recent results of Λ excited states )2 + (GeV/c M πΛ 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 )2 c Events / (0.020 GeV/ 0 100 200 sWeighted data Total fit + (980) 0 Λa η + Σ(1385) η + Σ(1380) + Λ(1670)π Total interference )2 + (… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Comparison of width and mass for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Comparison of resonance parameters for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The BESIII experiment is currently the world's only electron-positron collider operating in the tau-charm physical energy region. Since starting data taking in 2009, BESIII has accumulated the world's largest data set in the center-of-mass energy range of 1.84-4.95 GeV, including approximately 10 billion $J/\psi$ events and 3 billion $\psi(3686)$ events, together with extensive data on open-charm hadron pair production near threshold regions. These unique datasets, characterized by high statistics and low background, provide unprecedented experimental conditions for studying light baryon spectroscopy. This article systematically reviews the progress made by BESIII in baryon spectroscopy, with a focus on recent breakthrough achievements, including the discovery of excited nucleon states, $\Lambda$ hyperon states, $\Sigma$ hyperon states, $\Xi$ hyperon states and $\Omega^{-}$ hyperon states. These results expand the spectrum of baryon excited states and provide crucial experimental support for understanding non-perturbative QCD and resolving the ``missing baryon resonances'' problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review summarizing experimental results from the BESIII experiment on light baryon spectroscopy. It describes the accumulation of high-statistics datasets (approximately 10 billion J/ψ events and 3 billion ψ(3686) events) in the 1.84-4.95 GeV range and highlights recent observations of excited states in the N, Λ, Σ, Ξ, and Ω sectors. The central claim is that these findings expand the known baryon spectrum and furnish crucial experimental input for non-perturbative QCD and the long-standing missing-resonance problem.

Significance. If the resonance interpretations are robust, the compiled results constitute a valuable consolidation of new experimental constraints on baryon structure. The work directly addresses a core open question in hadron physics by increasing the number of observed light baryon excitations, thereby providing falsifiable benchmarks for quark models, lattice QCD, and effective-field-theory approaches to the non-perturbative regime.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract; sections on excited nucleon and hyperon states] Abstract and the sections reviewing N*, Λ*, Σ*, Ξ*, and Ω* discoveries: the assertion that the observed structures constitute new resonance states (and thereby resolve part of the missing-resonance problem) is load-bearing for the paper’s significance. As a review, the manuscript inherits the original Breit-Wigner-plus-polynomial fits without additional cross-checks against alternative hypotheses (no-resonance baseline, different background parameterizations, or coupled-channel interference). A concise discussion or table referencing the robustness tests performed in the cited BESIII publications is required to substantiate the count of new states.
minor comments (2)
  1. A summary table listing all newly reported states together with mass, width, statistical significance, and the specific decay channel used would improve readability and allow readers to assess the overall impact at a glance.
  2. The manuscript should explicitly state the integrated luminosities or number of events for each analysis channel when citing specific results, rather than referring only to the global data set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive recommendation for minor revision. The suggestion to strengthen the substantiation of resonance interpretations by referencing robustness tests from the original publications is well taken. We have incorporated this into the revised manuscript as described below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; sections on excited nucleon and hyperon states] Abstract and the sections reviewing N*, Λ*, Σ*, Ξ*, and Ω* discoveries: the assertion that the observed structures constitute new resonance states (and thereby resolve part of the missing-resonance problem) is load-bearing for the paper’s significance. As a review, the manuscript inherits the original Breit-Wigner-plus-polynomial fits without additional cross-checks against alternative hypotheses (no-resonance baseline, different background parameterizations, or coupled-channel interference). A concise discussion or table referencing the robustness tests performed in the cited BESIII publications is required to substantiate the count of new states.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly referencing the robustness tests performed in the original BESIII publications is appropriate for a review paper to support the resonance interpretations. While the manuscript compiles published results and does not repeat the full analyses, we have added a concise discussion in the relevant sections (N*, Λ*, Σ*, Ξ*, and Ω*) and a new summary table. This table lists, for each reported state, the key cross-checks from the cited works, including comparisons against no-resonance baselines, alternative background parameterizations, and assessments of coupled-channel interference where performed. Direct citations to the original publications are included. This addition substantiates the count of new states without changing the review character of the work or introducing new fits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental review grounded in direct data

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing BESIII experimental results on baryon spectroscopy. No derivation chain, equations, or theoretical predictions are presented that reduce claims to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation loads. The strongest claims rest on reported structures in invariant-mass spectra from accumulated data sets, which are externally verifiable via the underlying detector measurements and independent analyses. As an experimental summary without internal modeling steps that loop back to inputs, the work is self-contained against data benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms beyond standard particle physics practices, or invented entities are introduced; the paper relies on established resonance identification techniques in high-energy physics.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions for identifying resonances from invariant mass peaks in decay data
    The review depends on conventional methods for distinguishing new states from background in experimental spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1162 out tokens · 46952 ms · 2026-05-21T12:47:40.772111+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interpretation of $\Omega(2012)$ as a $\Xi(1530)K$ molecular state

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Ω(2012) is interpreted as a Ξ(1530)K molecular state with mass 2.00 ± 0.15 GeV and total decay width 0.96 MeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett.8, 214 (1964)

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Quark Models of Baryon Masses and Decays

    S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Quark models of baryon masses and decays, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45, S241 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/0008028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    L. Y . Glozman, W. Plessas, K. Varga, and R. F. Wagenbrunn, Unified description of light and strange baryon spectra, Phys. Rev. D58, 094030 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9706507

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    L. Y . Glozman and D. O. Riska, The Spectrum of the nucleons and the strange hyperons and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rept.268, 263 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9505422. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Menapara and A

    C. Menapara and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopic investigation of light strangeS=−1 Λ,ΣandS=−2 Ξbaryons, Chin. Phys. C 45, 063108 (2021), arXiv:2104.00439 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Wang, L.-S

    E. Wang, L.-S. Geng, J.-J. Wu, J.-J. Xie, and B.-S. Zou, Review of the Low-Lying Excited BaryonsΣ∗(1/2−), Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 101401 (2024), arXiv:2406.07839 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Prediction of nar- rowN ∗ andΛ ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 232001 (2010), arXiv:1007.0573 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Capstick and W

    S. Capstick and W. Roberts,N πdecays of baryons in a rela- tivized model, Phys. Rev. D47, 1994 (1993)

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    Isgur and G

    N. Isgur and G. Karl, Positive Parity Excited Baryons in a Quark Model with Hyperfine Interactions, Phys. Rev. D19, 2653 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 23, 817 (1981)]

    work page 1979

  10. [10]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Future Physics Programme of BE- SIII, Chin. Phys. C44, 040001 (2020), arXiv:1912.05983 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614, 345 (2010), arXiv:0911.4960 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Yu et al., BEPCII Performance and Beam Dynamics Studies on Luminosity, in 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference (2016) p

    C. Yu et al., BEPCII Performance and Beam Dynamics Studies on Luminosity, in 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference (2016) p. TUY A01

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    J. Lu, Y . Xiao, and X. Ji, Online monitoring of the center-of- mass energy from real data at BESIII, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods4, 337 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Zhang et al., Suppression of top-up injection backgrounds with offline event filter in the BESIII experiment, Radiat

    J.-W. Zhang et al., Suppression of top-up injection backgrounds with offline event filter in the BESIII experiment, Radiat. De- tect. Technol. Methods6, 289 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Li et al., Study of MRPC technology for BESIII endcap-TOF upgrade, Radiat

    X. Li et al., Study of MRPC technology for BESIII endcap-TOF upgrade, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1, 13 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Guo et al., The study of time calibration for upgraded end cap TOF of BESIII, Radiat

    Y .-X. Guo et al., The study of time calibration for upgraded end cap TOF of BESIII, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1, 15 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Cao et al., Design and construction of the new BESIII endcap Time-of-Flight system with MRPC Technology, Nucl

    P. Cao et al., Design and construction of the new BESIII endcap Time-of-Flight system with MRPC Technology, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A953, 163053 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    S. U. Chung, Helicity coupling amplitudes in tensor formalism, Phys. Rev. D48, 1225 (1993), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 56, 4419 (1997)]

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    S. U. Chung, A General formulation of covariant helicity cou- pling amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D57, 431 (1998)

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Eta-meson production in the resonance energy region

    V . Shklyar, H. Lenske, and U. Mosel,η-meson production in the resonance-energy region, Phys. Rev. C87, 015201 (2013), arXiv:1206.5414 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    High statistics study of the reaction $\gamma p\to p\;2\pi^0$

    V . Sokhoyan et al. (CBELSA/TAPS), High-statistics study of the reactionγp→p2π 0, Eur. Phys. J. A51, 95 (2015), [Er- ratum: Eur.Phys.J.A 51, 187 (2015)], arXiv:1507.02488 [nucl- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    B. C. Hunt and D. M. Manley, Updated determination ofN ∗ resonance parameters using a unitary, multichannel formalism, Phys. Rev. C99, 055205 (2019), arXiv:1810.13086 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    First results on nucleon resonance photocouplings from the $\gamma p \to \pi^+\pi^-p$ reaction

    E. Golovatch et al. (CLAS), First results on nucleon resonance photocouplings from theγp→π +π−preaction, Phys. Lett. B 788, 371 (2019), arXiv:1806.01767 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    J. Z. Bai et al. (BES), Study ofN ∗ production fromJ/ψ→ p¯pη, Phys. Lett. B510, 75 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0105011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Observation of two new $N^*$ resonances in $\psi(3686) \rightarrow p\bar{p}\pi^0$

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of two newN ∗ reso- nances in the decayψ(3686)→p¯pπ 0, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 022001 (2013), arXiv:1207.0223 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of a New ExcitedΣ State inψ(3686)→¯pK +Σ0+c.c., (2026), arXiv:2602.11501 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Partial wave analyses of $\psi(3686)\to p\bar{p}\pi^0$ and $\psi(3686)\to p\bar{p}\eta$

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Partial wave analyses of ψ(3686)→p¯pπ 0 andψ(3686)→p¯pη, Phys. Rev. D111, 032011 (2025), arXiv:2412.06247 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Measurement ofψ(3686)→Λ ¯Λη andψ(3686)→Λ ¯Λπ0 decays, Phys. Rev. D106, 072006 (2022), arXiv:2207.14350 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Study ofψ(3686)→Λ ¯Λω, Phys. Rev. D106, 112011 (2022), arXiv:2207.11666 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Determination of Spin-Parity Quan- tum Numbers for the Narrow Structure near thep ¯ΛThreshold ine +e− →pK − ¯Λ+c.c., Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 151901 (2023), arXiv:2303.01989 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Precise measurement of the branch- ing fractions ofJ/ψ→ ¯Λπ+Σ− +c.c.andJ/ψ→ ¯Λπ−Σ+ + c.c., Phys. Rev. D108, 112012 (2023), arXiv:2306.10319 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Partial wave analysis ofψ(3686)→ Λ¯Σ0π0+c.c, JHEP02, 212, arXiv:2408.00495 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    S. U. Chung, J. Brose, R. Hackmann, E. Klempt, S. Spanier, and C. Strassburger, Partial wave analysis in K matrix formalism, Annalen Phys.4, 404 (1995)

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    D. Jido, J. A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos, and U. G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics of the twoΛ(1405)states, Nucl. Phys. A725, 181 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0303062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    The light baryon spectrum in a relativistic quark model with instanton-induced quark forces II. The strange baryon spectrum

    U. Loring, B. C. Metsch, and H. R. Petry, The Light baryon spectrum in a relativistic quark model with instanton induced quark forces: The Strange baryon spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. A10, 447 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0103290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Amplitude analysis and branch- ing fraction measurement ofJ/ψ→Λ ¯Σ0η+ c.c, (2026), arXiv:2601.07617 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Multichannel parametrization of $\bar K N$ scattering amplitudes and extraction of resonance parameters

    H. Zhang, J. Tulpan, M. Shrestha, and D. M. Manley, Mul- tichannel parametrization of ¯KNscattering amplitudes and extraction of resonance parameters, Phys. Rev. C88, 035205 (2013), arXiv:1305.4575 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    A. V . Sarantsev, M. Matveev, V . A. Nikonov, A. V . Anisovich, U. Thoma, and E. Klempt, Hyperon II: Properties of excited hyperons, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 180 (2019), arXiv:1907.13387 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Menapara and A

    C. Menapara and A. K. Rai, Hadron Spectroscopy: Light, Strange Baryons, Few Body Syst.65, 63 (2024), arXiv:2405.06417 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of the decay ψ(3686)→Σ 0 ¯Σ0ω10.1103/PhysRevD.111.092007 (2025), arXiv:2503.18620 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation ofΛ + c →Λa 0(980)+ and Evidence forΣ(1380) + inΛ + c →Λπ +η, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 021901 (2025), arXiv:2407.12270 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    J.-J. Wu, S. Dulat, and B. S. Zou, Evidence for a newΣ ∗ reso- nance withJ P = 1/2− in the old data ofK −p→Λπ +π− re- action, Phys. Rev. D80, 017503 (2009), arXiv:0906.3950 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    $\Sigma^*_{1/2^-}(1380)$ in the $\Lambda^+_c \to \eta \pi^+ \Lambda$ decay

    J.-J. Xie and L.-S. Geng,Σ ∗ 1/2−(1380)in theΛ + c →ηπ +Λde- cay, Phys. Rev. D95, 074024 (2017), arXiv:1703.09502 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    R. T. Ross, T. Buran, J. L. Lloyd, J. H. Mulvey, and D. Rado- jicic,Ξπresonance with mass 1606 MeV/c 2, Phys. Lett. B38, 177 (1972)

    work page 1972

  46. [46]

    A. d. Bellefon, A. Berthon, and P. Billoir, ReactionsK −p→ Ξ−K 0 +π + 0 between 2210 and 2435 MeV Ecm, Nuovo Cim. A 11 28, 289 (1975)

    work page 1975

  47. [47]

    Briefel et al., Search forΞ ∗ Production inK −pInteractions at 2.87 GeV/c, Phys

    E. Briefel et al., Search forΞ ∗ Production inK −pInteractions at 2.87 GeV/c, Phys. Rev. D16, 2706 (1977)

    work page 1977

  48. [48]

    Observation of $\Xi(1620)^0$ and evidence for $\Xi(1690)^0$ in $\Xi_c^+ \rightarrow \Xi^-\pi^+\pi^+$ decays

    M. Sumihama et al. (Belle), Observation ofΞ(1620) 0 and ev- idence forΞ(1690) 0 inΞ + c →Ξ −π+π+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 072501 (2019), arXiv:1810.06181 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Measurement of the cross section fore +e− →Ξ −¯Ξ+ and observation of an excitedΞbaryon, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 032002 (2020), arXiv:1910.04921 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    M. I. Adamovich et al. (W A89), Production ofΞ ∗ resonances inΣ − induced reactions at 345 GeV/c, Eur. Phys. J. C11, 271 (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9907021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Study of excitedΞstates in ψ(3686)→K −Λ¯Ξ+ +c.c., Phys. Rev. D109, 072008 (2024), arXiv:2308.15206 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Molina, W.-H

    R. Molina, W.-H. Liang, C.-W. Xiao, Z.-F. Sun, and E. Oset, Two states for theΞ(1820)resonance, Phys. Lett. B856, 138872 (2024), arXiv:2309.03618 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Observation of an excited $\Omega^-$ baryon

    J. Yelton et al. (Belle), Observation of an ExcitedΩ − Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 052003 (2018), arXiv:1805.09384 [hep- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Jia et al

    S. Jia et al. (Belle), Observation ofΩ(2012) − →Ξ(1530) ¯K and measurement of the effective couplings ofΩ(2012) − toΞ(1530) ¯KandΞ ¯K, Phys. Lett. B860, 139224 (2025), arXiv:2207.03090 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)

    work page 1986

  56. [56]

    R. N. Faustov and V . O. Galkin, Strange baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D92, 054005 (2015), arXiv:1507.04530 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Strangeness -2 and -3 Baryons in a Constituent Quark Model

    M. Pervin and W. Roberts, Strangeness -2 and -3 baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C77, 025202 (2008), arXiv:0709.4000 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    Xi and Omega baryons in the Skyrme model

    Y . Oh,ΞandΩbaryons in the Skyrme model, Phys. Rev. D75, 074002 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0702126

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    G. P. Engel, C. B. Lang, D. Mohler, and A. Sch ¨afer (BGR), QCD with Two Light Dynamical Chirally Improved Quarks: Baryons, Phys. Rev. D87, 074504 (2013), arXiv:1301.4318 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  60. [60]

    K.-L. Wang, J. Wang, Y .-K. Hsiao, and X.-H. Zhong, Excited Ωhyperon in charmfulΩ b weak decays, Phys. Rev. D111, 114028 (2025), arXiv:2412.02464 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Shen, J.-X

    Q.-H. Shen, J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, X. Liu, and J.-J. Xie, Radia- tive decays of theΩ(2012)as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D113, 036014 (2026), arXiv:2510.13623 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Evidence for Two ExcitedΩ − Hy- perons, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 131903 (2025), arXiv:2411.11648 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, D. G. Richards, and S. J. Wal- lace (Hadron Spectrum), Flavor structure of the excited baryon spectra from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D87, 054506 (2013), arXiv:1212.5236 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Luo and X

    S.-Q. Luo and X. Liu, Identifying triple-strangenessΩhyper- ons in light of recent experimental results, Phys. Rev. D112, 014047 (2025), arXiv:2504.14648 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Han, Z.-W

    F.-C. Han, Z.-W. Liu, D. B. Leinweber, and A. W. Thomas, Structure of theΩ −(2012)with Hamiltonian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D112, L051503 (2025), arXiv:2507.06682 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    E. B. Levichev, A. N. Skrinsky, G. M. Tumaikin, and Y . M. Shatunov, Electron–positron beam collision studies at the Bud- ker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Phys. Usp.61, 405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Achasov et al., Front

    M. Achasov et al., STCF conceptual design report (V olume 1): Physics & detector, Front. Phys. (Beijing)19, 14701 (2024), arXiv:2303.15790 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024