pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.08701 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO

Very High Energy Gamma Rays from Ultra Fast Outflows

B. Le Nagat Neher , E. Peretti , P. Cristofari , A. Zech This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO
keywords ultra-fast outflowsAGNgamma raysparticle accelerationCherenkov telescopesneutrinosshocksVHE emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultra-fast outflows from nearby AGN can accelerate particles to produce detectable very-high-energy gamma rays with next-generation telescopes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models particle acceleration at the strong sub-relativistic shocks formed when ultra-fast outflows expand into dense circumnuclear gas around active galactic nuclei. It calculates the resulting gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes from pion decay and other processes for a sample of observed nearby UFOs. The calculations show that several of these outflows reach fluxes detectable by the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory in the very-high-energy band, even when their emission stays below the sensitivity of Fermi-LAT at lower energies. This opens a route to the first gamma-ray detections of AGN UFOs and a direct test of particle acceleration in shocks slower than those in supernova remnants or relativistic jets.

Core claim

By modeling the acceleration of protons and electrons at the strong shocks of ultra-fast outflows, the authors find that several nearby identified UFOs could produce very-high-energy gamma-ray signals detectable by CTAO while remaining undetected by Fermi-LAT. Detectability holds when the proton spectrum is hard (index ≲ 3.9), acceleration efficiency is high, and magnetic fields are amplified beyond simple compression values. The work concludes that next-generation VHE observatories could deliver the first gamma-ray signatures of AGN UFOs and thereby probe particle acceleration in the sub-relativistic regime.

What carries the argument

The shock-acceleration model that injects protons and electrons into the expanding UFO shell and computes the ensuing gamma-ray and neutrino emission from hadronic and leptonic interactions.

If this is right

  • VHE gamma-ray detections would confirm efficient particle acceleration at sub-relativistic shocks driven by AGN outflows.
  • Some UFOs could be discovered first through their gamma-ray emission rather than through X-ray or optical signatures.
  • The same shocks are predicted to produce accompanying high-energy neutrinos accessible to future detectors.
  • Non-detections at VHE energies would directly constrain the acceleration efficiency and magnetic-field amplification inside UFOs.
  • Successful detections would supply a new observational handle on how AGN feedback deposits energy into the circumnuclear environment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the VHE signals are seen, they could link UFOs to a fraction of the galactic cosmic-ray population at energies below the knee.
  • The model can be tested by searching for correlated neutrino events from the same sources once next-generation neutrino telescopes reach the required sensitivity.
  • Extending the calculation to a larger, flux-limited sample of AGN would predict how many UFOs should appear in future all-sky VHE surveys.
  • The required hard spectra and amplified fields imply specific microphysical conditions at the shock that could be checked with radio or X-ray observations of the same objects.

Load-bearing premise

Proton spectra must be hard enough (index at most about 3.9) with high acceleration efficiency and amplified magnetic fields to reach observable gamma-ray levels.

What would settle it

A sensitive CTAO observation of one of the modeled nearby UFOs that returns a firm upper limit below the predicted very-high-energy flux for the adopted parameters would rule out the detectability claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08701 by A. Zech, B. Le Nagat Neher, E. Peretti, P. Cristofari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Description of the sample of sources, top panel : dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of the geometry of UFOs and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Number of UFOs with a gamma-ray signal above the typical sensitivity of the CTAO (50 hours) and below the Fermi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Number of UFOs with a gamma-ray signal above the typical sensitivity of the CTAO (50 hours) with dark areas for parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sources Distance [Mpc] voutflow [c] Type NGC 4051 8 0.128 Seyfert 1.5 MCG-5-23-16∗ 38 0.116 Seyfert 1.9 NGC 7582∗ 21 0.285 Seyfert 2 Mrk 79 94 0.091 Seyfert 1 3C 111 209 0.083 FRII IC 5063∗ 47 0.311 Seyfert 2 IRAS 05054+1718(W) 77 0.176 Seyfert 1 MCG-01-24-12∗ 85 0.098 Seyfert 2 MCG-03-58-007∗ 137 0.193 Seyfert 2 Mrk 231 179 0.241 Seyfert 1 Mrk 273 162 0.265 Seyfert 2 Mrk 279 128 0.220 Seyfert 1 NGC-1068∗ … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ratio of hadronic gamma rays over hadronic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Context. Ultra fast outflows (UFOs) from active galactic nuclei (AGN) are expected to lead to the formation of sub-relativistic strong shocks expanding in a dense circumnuclear medium, and thus have the potential for being efficient particle accelerators, and to be proficient sources of gamma rays and neutrinos. Aims. We investigate the detectability of a sample of nearby identified UFOs in gamma rays and neutrinos with current and next- generation instruments. Methods. We model the acceleration of particles at the strong shocks of UFOs, and estimate the associated gamma-ray and neutrino signal. We adopt our model to investigate the prospects for detection with current and next-generation observatories. Results. We find that several UFOs could be detectable in the very-high-energy (VHE) domain - for example, by the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO)- even if they remain undetected by Fermi-LAT in the high-energy range. Detectability is favored for hard proton spectra (spectral index {\alpha} \lessim 3.9), high acceleration efficiencies, and amplified magnetic fields. Our results suggest that next-generation VHE observatories could detect the first gamma-ray signatures of AGN UFOs, providing a new probe of particle acceleration in sub-relativistic shocks

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript models particle acceleration at sub-relativistic shocks driven by ultra-fast outflows (UFOs) from AGN, estimates the resulting gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes, and concludes that several nearby UFOs could be detectable at very-high energies by CTAO even if undetected by Fermi-LAT, provided hard proton spectra (α ≲ 3.9), high acceleration efficiencies, and amplified magnetic fields.

Significance. If the adopted parameters are physically justified, the work would provide the first quantitative prediction of VHE gamma-ray emission from AGN UFOs, establishing a new observational probe of particle acceleration in sub-relativistic shocks and potentially constraining the contribution of UFOs to cosmic-ray production and AGN feedback.

major comments (2)
  1. [Modeling section] Modeling section: the central detectability claim requires proton spectral index α ≲ 3.9 together with high acceleration efficiency and amplified B-fields, yet these values are inserted by hand rather than derived from the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions of the sub-relativistic shocks or from existing X-ray/UV constraints on the same objects; because luminosity scales steeply with spectral hardness and B, the statement that 'several UFOs could be detectable' is conditional on the optimistic corner of parameter space.
  2. [Results section] Results section: no sensitivity study is shown for modest shifts (e.g., α = 4.0 or unamplified B), which the text itself indicates would drop predicted fluxes below CTAO sensitivity; this absence makes the 'several UFOs' claim load-bearing on untested assumptions rather than on robust predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the full range of parameters explored and the precise sample of UFOs considered.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the magnetic-field amplification factor is introduced without a dedicated equation or table summarizing its adopted range and physical motivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve the justification of parameters and add the requested sensitivity analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Modeling section] Modeling section: the central detectability claim requires proton spectral index α ≲ 3.9 together with high acceleration efficiency and amplified B-fields, yet these values are inserted by hand rather than derived from the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions of the sub-relativistic shocks or from existing X-ray/UV constraints on the same objects; because luminosity scales steeply with spectral hardness and B, the statement that 'several UFOs could be detectable' is conditional on the optimistic corner of parameter space.

    Authors: We agree that the adopted parameters are central to the detectability predictions and that their physical motivation should be strengthened. The values are drawn from standard DSA expectations for sub-relativistic shocks (where indices softer than 2 are common due to finite shock thickness and turbulence) and are broadly consistent with X-ray/UV constraints on UFO velocities and energetics. However, they are not re-derived from Rankine-Hugoniot conditions in the present work. We will revise the modeling section to include explicit references to relevant shock-acceleration simulations and observational constraints, and will state more clearly that the 'several UFOs' claim applies to the plausible optimistic end of the parameter space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section: no sensitivity study is shown for modest shifts (e.g., α = 4.0 or unamplified B), which the text itself indicates would drop predicted fluxes below CTAO sensitivity; this absence makes the 'several UFOs' claim load-bearing on untested assumptions rather than on robust predictions.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The manuscript text already notes the steep dependence on spectral index and B-field strength, yet no quantitative sensitivity study is provided. We will add a dedicated sensitivity subsection (or appendix) showing the effect of shifting to α = 4.0 and to unamplified B-fields, including updated flux estimates and a revised discussion of which sources remain potentially detectable. This will make the robustness of the conclusions explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; detectability claims are conditional on explicitly adopted parameters

full rationale

The paper models particle acceleration at sub-relativistic UFO shocks and computes gamma-ray/neutrino fluxes using standard shock acceleration theory. Detectability statements are presented as conditional on chosen values (hard spectra with α ≲ 3.9, high acceleration efficiency, amplified B-fields) rather than derived from or fitted to existing gamma-ray observations of the same objects. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central result remains a forward prediction under stated assumptions and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard diffusive shock acceleration applied to sub-relativistic UFO shocks together with adopted values for acceleration efficiency and magnetic-field strength; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • proton spectral index α
    Adopted to be hard (≲ 3.9) to achieve detectability; value is chosen rather than derived
  • acceleration efficiency
    High values assumed to produce observable fluxes; not constrained by independent data in the abstract
  • magnetic field amplification factor
    Assumed amplified beyond simple compression to enable efficient acceleration
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Diffusive shock acceleration operates efficiently at sub-relativistic strong shocks in dense circumnuclear media
    Invoked to model particle spectra and gamma-ray production
  • domain assumption The circumnuclear medium density and UFO shock velocities are sufficient for significant pion production and gamma-ray emission
    Required for the estimated signals to reach detectable levels

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1486 out tokens · 62733 ms · 2026-05-15T13:20:54.118084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2018, Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (WORLD SCIENTIFIC)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    G., Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., et al. 2021, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 48, 060501

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    2020, ApJS, 247, 33

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Ackermann, M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 33

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    A., Kelner, S

    Aharonian, F. A., Kelner, S. R., & Prosekin, A. Y . 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 82, 043002

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    2024, Astroparticle Physics, 162, 102990

    Aiello, S., Albert, A., Alshamsi, M., et al. 2024, Astroparticle Physics, 162, 102990

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 921, 144

    Ajello, M., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 921, 144

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    2023, ApJ, 954, L49

    Ajello, M., Murase, K., & McDaniel, A. 2023, ApJ, 954, L49

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    & Blasi, P

    Amato, E. & Blasi, P. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L76

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    B., Abdo, A

    Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 697, 1071–1102

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Batzofin, R., Cristofari, P., Egberts, K., Steppa, C., & Meyer, D. M. A. 2024, A&A, 687, A279

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    2009, A&A, 504, 401

    Cappi, M., Tombesi, F., Bianchi, S., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 401

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    C., & Blasi, P

    Caprioli, D., Haggerty, C. C., & Blasi, P. 2020, ApJ, 905, 2

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    N., Gallagher, S

    Chartas, G., Brandt, W. N., Gallagher, S. C., & Garmire, G. P. 2002, The Astro- physical Journal, 579, 169

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 24

    Chartas, G., Cappi, M., Vignali, C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 24

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    N., Giustini, M., & Garmire, G

    Chartas, G., Saez, C., Brandt, W. N., Giustini, M., & Garmire, G. P. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 706, 644–656

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Chevalier, R. A. & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44

    work page 1985

  17. [17]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18763

    Cristofari, P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18763

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 28

    Cristofari, P., Blasi, P., & Caprioli, D. 2022, ApJ, 930, 28

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 2435

    Ehlert, D., Oikonomou, F., & Peretti, E. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2435

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Eichmann, B., Oikonomou, F., Salvatore, S., Dettmar, R.-J., & Tjus, J. B. 2022, ApJ, 939, 43 Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. & Quataert, E. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 605

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    & Rodighiero, G

    Franceschini, A. & Rodighiero, G. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 603, A34

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    2010, ApJ, 715, 636

    Fukumura, K., Kazanas, D., Contopoulos, I., & Behar, E. 2010, ApJ, 715, 636

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    2014, ApJ, 780, 120

    Fukumura, K., Tombesi, F., Kazanas, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 120

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    & Aharonian, F

    Gabici, S. & Aharonian, F. A. 2014, MNRAS, 445, L70

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    M., & Rakowski, C

    Ghavamian, P., Laming, J. M., & Rakowski, C. E. 2007, ApJ, 654, L69

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    J., Mitchell, J., Masters, A., & Laming, J

    Ghavamian, P., Schwartz, S. J., Mitchell, J., Masters, A., & Laming, J. M. 2013, Space Sci. Rev., 178, 633

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    E., Bianchi, S., Petrucci, P

    Gianolli, V . E., Bianchi, S., Petrucci, P. O., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A235

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    N., Tombesi, F., et al

    Gofford, J., Reeves, J. N., Tombesi, F., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 60

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    2025, A&A, 704, A146

    Gu, L., Fukumura, K., Kaastra, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A146

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Hillas, A. M. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 425

    work page 1984

  31. [31]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y .-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2014, ApJ, 796, 106

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    M., & Vila, G

    Kafexhiu, E., Aharonian, F., Taylor, A. M., & Vila, G. S. 2014, Physical Review D, 90

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    R., Aharonian, F

    Kelner, S. R., Aharonian, F. A., & Bugayov, V . V . 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 74, 034018

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    A., & Kelner, S

    Khangulyan, D., Aharonian, F. A., & Kelner, S. R. 2014, ApJ, 783, 100

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    & Pounds, K

    King, A. & Pounds, K. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 115

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    2019, The physics and astrophysics of X-ray outflows from Active Galactic Nuclei

    Laha, S., Smith, R., Tzanavaris, P., et al. 2019, The physics and astrophysics of X-ray outflows from Active Galactic Nuclei

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    2016, A&A, 596, A68

    Lamastra, A., Fiore, F., Guetta, D., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A68

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    2019, Astroparticle Physics, 112, 16

    Lamastra, A., Tavecchio, F., Romano, P., Landoni, M., & Vercellone, S. 2019, Astroparticle Physics, 112, 16

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    2010, A&A, 524, A72

    Lenain, J.-P., Ricci, C., Türler, M., Dorner, D., & Walter, R. 2010, A&A, 524, A72

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Malkov, M. A. & Drury, L. O. 2001, Reports on Progress in Physics, 64, 429

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 169

    Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    A., Brusa, M., Lanzuisi, G., et al

    Matzeu, G. A., Brusa, M., Lanzuisi, G., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A182 Article number, page 8 of 9 B. Le Nagat Neher et al.: Very High Energy Gamma Rays from Ultra Fast Outflows

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    2024, MN- RAS, 532, 3036

    Mestici, S., Tombesi, F., Gaspari, M., Piconcelli, E., & Panessa, F. 2024, MN- RAS, 532, 3036

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    W., & Ryu, D

    Miniati, F., Jones, T. W., & Ryu, D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 242

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    & Caprioli, D

    Morlino, G. & Caprioli, D. 2012, A&A, 538, A81

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    R., Alexander, D

    Mullaney, J. R., Alexander, D. M., Goulding, A. D., & Hickox, R. C. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1082

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    M., Kimura, S

    Murase, K., Karwin, C. M., Kimura, S. S., Ajello, M., & Buson, S. 2024, ApJ, 961, L34

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    & Semikoz, D

    Neronov, A. & Semikoz, D. 2020, Physical Review D, 102

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    2015, MNRAS, 447, 3612

    Nims, J., Quataert, E., & Faucher-Giguère, C.-A. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3612

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1077

    Padovani, P., Resconi, E., Ajello, M., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1077

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    2015, Phys

    Park, J., Caprioli, D., & Spitkovsky, A. 2015, Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 085003

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    G., et al

    Peretti, E., Lamastra, A., Saturni, F. G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 181

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Peretti, E., Peron, G., Tombesi, F., et al. 2025, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2025, 013

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    A., Reeves, J

    Pounds, K. A., Reeves, J. N., King, A. R., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 705

    work page 2003

  55. [55]

    N., O’Brien, P

    Reeves, J. N., O’Brien, P. T., & Ward, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 593, L65

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    & Trakhtenbrot, B

    Ricci, C. & Trakhtenbrot, B. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    2024, A&A, 687, A139

    Salvatore, S., Eichmann, B., Rodrigues, X., Dettmar, R.-J., & Becker Tjus, J. 2024, A&A, 687, A139

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    & Rees, M

    Silk, J. & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    N., & Braito, V

    Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., & Braito, V . 2012, MNRAS, 422, L1

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    N., et al

    Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A57

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    F., et al

    Tombesi, F., Tazaki, F., Mushotzky, R. F., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2154

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    2015, A&A, 579, A13

    Vink, J., Broersen, S., Bykov, A., & Gabici, S. 2015, A&A, 579, A13

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    1977, ApJ, 218, 377 Xrism Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al

    Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. 1977, ApJ, 218, 377 Xrism Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2025, Nature, 641, 1132

    work page 1977

  64. [64]

    C., Hagino, K., et al

    Xu, Y ., Gallo, L. C., Hagino, K., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, S223

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    2024, ApJS, 274, 8

    Yamada, S., Kawamuro, T., Mizumoto, M., et al. 2024, ApJS, 274, 8

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    M., Gallagher, III, J

    Yoast-Hull, T. M., Gallagher, III, J. S., Zweibel, E. G., & Everett, J. E. 2014, ApJ, 780, 137

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    Zavala, R. T. & Taylor, G. B. 2004, ApJ, 612, 749

    work page 2004

  68. [68]

    Zirakashvili, V . N. & Ptuskin, V . S. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Con- ference Series, V ol. 1085, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. F. A. Aharonian, W. Hofmann, & F. Rieger (AIP), 336–339 Article number, page 9 of 9

    work page 2008