pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03283 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

FRB Searches with the Irish LOFAR Station

D. J. McKenna , E. F. Keane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords fast radio burstsLOFARlow-frequency radionull resultstransient searchesIrish LOFAR stationFRB emission models
0
0 comments X

The pith

No radio emission below 200 MHz was detected from six known fast radio burst sources in 218 hours of Irish LOFAR observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents null results from a search for low-frequency radio signals from six known fast radio bursts using the Irish LOFAR station's high-band antennas. Data were collected over three years for a total of 218 hours, yet no emission was found below 200 MHz. This outcome tests models that expect detectable FRB signals at these frequencies and sets limits on any such emission. A reader cares because fast radio bursts remain mysterious, and ruling out low-frequency components narrows the range of possible emission mechanisms and propagation effects.

Core claim

The central claim is that targeted observations with the Irish LOFAR high-band antennas produced no detectable radio emission below 200 MHz from any of the six known fast radio burst sources despite a cumulative 218 hours of integration time across 2020-2022.

What carries the argument

The Irish LOFAR station's high-band antennas performing pointed observations at known FRB sky positions to search for signals below 200 MHz.

Load-bearing premise

The observing setup and total duration were sufficient to detect low-frequency emission if it existed at the levels predicted by current FRB models, with no major unaccounted sensitivity losses or source variability.

What would settle it

Detection of radio emission below 200 MHz from one of the six sources in a follow-up observation with comparable sensitivity and integration time would falsify the reported null result.

read the original abstract

Here we report null results in the search for radio emission below $200$~MHz from six known fast radio burst sources. The observations reported here were taken using the Irish LOFAR station's high-band antennas over the course of 2020, 2021 and 2022; the cumulative observing time was $218$~h.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports null results from a search for radio emission below 200 MHz from six known fast radio burst sources using the Irish LOFAR station high-band antennas. Observations were conducted over 2020–2022 with a cumulative integration time of 218 hours; standard dedispersion, RFI excision, and fluence upper-limit calculations following established LOFAR practices are described, yielding no detections.

Significance. If the non-detections hold, the work supplies useful observational constraints on the low-frequency spectra and emission properties of FRBs, complementing higher-frequency detections and aiding tests of propagation and source models in the field of transient radio astronomy. The dedicated use of a single LOFAR station for targeted FRB follow-up adds to the growing multi-frequency dataset.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The abstract states the null result and total time but omits any mention of achieved fluence limits or sensitivity; adding a single sentence on the 5σ fluence threshold would better contextualize the non-detection for readers.
  2. Methods section: The RFI excision and statistical threshold details are described as following standard LOFAR practices, but explicit values for the S/N threshold and dispersion measure search range would improve reproducibility without lengthening the text.
  3. Table 1 or equivalent: The list of six FRB sources would benefit from an additional column showing the individual integration times per source to allow direct assessment of per-target sensitivity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript reporting null results from low-frequency FRB searches with the Irish LOFAR station. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we have prepared a revised version incorporating any necessary clarifications to the methods and upper-limit calculations. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is a pure observational report of null results from 218 hours of LOFAR HBA observations of six known FRBs. The central claim is a direct non-detection with standard dedispersion, RFI excision, and fluence upper-limit calculations following established practices. No derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or equations appear that reduce to prior data or self-citations by construction. The methods are self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an observational null-result report that relies on standard radio-astronomy data processing assumptions rather than new theoretical constructs or fitted parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in radio interferometry and transient detection pipelines hold for LOFAR high-band data
    Invoked implicitly for processing the 218 hours of observations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5339 in / 1182 out tokens · 36185 ms · 2026-05-15T00:07:42.878983+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T able 1.Measured flux density limits for the 6 target sources observed in this work. Source S150 limit (Jy) SGR 1935+2154 (FRB 20200428A) 25.9 FRB 180916 (R3) 35.4 FRB 20190303A (R17) 20.3 FRB 20200120E 32.7 FRB 20201124A 21.6 FRB 20220912A 25.0 Amiri et al., 2020, Nature, 582,

    work page 1935

  2. [2]

    Andersen et al., 2019, ApJ, 885,

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Andersen et al., 2020, Nature, 587,

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Bochenek et al., 2020, Nature, 587,

    Barsdell & Jameson, 2024, Astrophysical Source Code Library, 2407.016. Bochenek et al., 2020, Nature, 587,

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration, 2021, Astronomer’s Telegram, 14497

    3 Bhardwaj et al., 2021, ApJ, 910, L18. CHIME/FRB Collaboration, 2021, Astronomer’s Telegram, 14497. Dhillon et al., 2021, MNRAS, 507,

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Gopinath et al., 2023, MNRAS, 527,

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Hardy et al., 2017, MNRAS, 472,

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Notes AAS, 10,

    Keane & McKenna, 2026, Res. Notes AAS, 10,

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    Lorimer, 2011, Astrophysical Source Code Library, 1107.016

    Kirsten et al., 2021, Astronomer’s Telegram, 14605. Lorimer, 2011, Astrophysical Source Code Library, 1107.016. Maan et al., 2022, Astronomer’s Telegram, 15168. Main et al., 2022, MNRAS, 509,

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Marcote et al., 2020, Nature, 577,

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    McKenna et al., 2024, MNRAS, 527,

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Michilli et al., 2023, ApJ, 950,

    McKinven et al., 2022, Astronomer’s Telegram, 15679. Michilli et al., 2023, ApJ, 950,

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Pilia et al., 2020, ApJ, 896, L40

    Ould-Boukattine et al., 2022, Astronomer’s Telegram, 15817. Pilia et al., 2020, ApJ, 896, L40. Rajwade et al., 2020, MNRAS, 495,

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Rehan et al., 2023, ApJ, 950,

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Zhu et al., 2020, Astronomer’s Telegram, 14084

    work page 2020