pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06121 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Free Surface Enhancement of Droplet Rupture by Cavitation Bubble Collapse

Chenghao Xu , Zhengyu Yang , Jie Feng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords cavitation bubbledroplet ruptureKelvin impulseWeber numberscaling lawfree surfaceconfined geometrymicrojet
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-dimensional Kelvin impulse yields a scaling law that predicts droplet rupture by collapsing cavitation bubbles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies cavitation bubbles collapsing near oil droplets inside a thin water layer bounded by a free surface and a rigid wall. Two regimes emerge: droplets rupture into smaller fragments or remain intact. By defining a non-dimensional Kelvin impulse that stands for the momentum of the bubble-driven jet, the authors produce a scaling relation that ties the rupture threshold to a characteristic Weber number and the bubble-to-droplet size ratio. This supplies a compact criterion for when breakup occurs in confined geometries.

Core claim

We reveal two distinct regimes of droplet response to cavitation bubble collapse: the rupture regime, where oil droplets fragment into smaller droplets, and the no-rupture regime, where the droplet remains intact. By deriving a non-dimensional Kelvin impulse to represent the momentum of the bubble-induced jet, we establish a scaling law that correlates the criterion for droplet rupture to a characteristic Weber number and the bubble-to-droplet size ratio for the first time. This framework delineates the rupture boundary and extends to predict the rupture of particle-laden droplets.

What carries the argument

The non-dimensional Kelvin impulse, which quantifies the momentum of the bubble-induced jet and serves as the basis for the rupture scaling law.

If this is right

  • The scaling law marks the boundary between rupture and no-rupture regimes in the confined geometry.
  • The same relation can be applied to forecast rupture of particle-laden droplets under cavitation.
  • The criterion supplies predictive control for processes that rely on bubble-driven droplet breakup.
  • The framework isolates the hydrodynamic role of the free-surface confinement in enhancing rupture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scaling approach may reduce the need for full numerical simulations when designing ultrasonic emulsification or surface-cleaning devices.
  • In biomedical delivery contexts the relation could indicate the minimum bubble size needed to fragment carrier droplets at a given driving strength.
  • The emphasis on free-surface effects suggests that open or semi-open geometries may achieve rupture at lower energies than fully walled channels.

Load-bearing premise

That the non-dimensional Kelvin impulse alone captures the dominant momentum transfer without significant interference from viscosity, detailed surface deformation, or three-dimensional flow features.

What would settle it

An experiment that varies only bubble-to-droplet size ratio and Weber number while holding other parameters fixed and checks whether the observed rupture boundary matches the predicted scaling law.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06121 by Chenghao Xu, Jie Feng, Zhengyu Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Experimental setup for the interaction between a cavitation bubble and an oil droplet in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Interactions between a cavitation bubble and a silicone oil droplet under different con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Physical model based on the the method of image. To satisfy the boundary condi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Regime maps of droplet rupture in the parameter space of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Regime maps of droplet rupture between a cavitation bubble and (a) an oil droplet and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interaction between cavitation bubbles and surrounding droplets plays a central role in applications such as surface cleaning, ultrasonic emulsification, and therapeutic delivery. These processes depend on bubble-driven microjets that drive the deformation and breakup of the droplets, which are significantly influenced by geometric confinements. Here, we investigate the hydrodynamic interaction between cavitation bubbles and oil droplets within a thin water layer considering the coupling confinements of a free surface and a rigid wall. We reveal two distinct regimes of droplet response to cavitation bubble collapse: the rupture regime, where oil droplets fragment into smaller droplets, and the no-rupture regime, where the droplet remains intact. By deriving a non-dimensional Kelvin impulse to represent the momentum of the bubble-induced jet, we establish a scaling law that correlates the criterion for droplet rupture to a characteristic Weber number and the bubble-to-droplet size ratio for the first time. This framework delineates the rupture boundary and even extends to predict the rupture of particle-laden droplets driven by cavitation bubbles. Our findings reveal the hydrodynamic principles underlying the cavitation bubble-driven droplet rupture and provide predictive criteria for controlling performance in engineering and biomedical systems involving cavitation bubble dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the hydrodynamic interaction between cavitation bubbles and oil droplets in a thin water layer bounded by a free surface and a rigid wall. It identifies rupture and no-rupture regimes of the droplet under bubble collapse. The authors derive a non-dimensional Kelvin impulse to characterize the momentum of the bubble-induced jet and propose a scaling law relating the rupture criterion to a characteristic Weber number and the bubble-to-droplet size ratio. This scaling is claimed to delineate the boundary between regimes and is extended to particle-laden droplets.

Significance. If the scaling law holds as a first-principles prediction rather than a calibrated fit, it would provide a valuable predictive tool for controlling droplet breakup in confined cavitation flows, with direct relevance to surface cleaning, emulsification, and biomedical delivery systems. The attempt to non-dimensionalize the Kelvin impulse and link it to Weber number and size ratio is a constructive step beyond purely empirical descriptions. However, the presence of a free threshold parameter and questions about boundary corrections in the derivation reduce the immediate impact until these elements are clarified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory section] Theory section: The derivation of the non-dimensional Kelvin impulse does not appear to augment the standard expression with image potentials or free-surface corrections for the rigid wall and free-surface boundaries in the thin-layer confinement. Standard Kelvin-impulse theory assumes unbounded fluid or simple images; without these terms the dimensionless group may miss momentum redistribution from surface deformation and wall proximity, undermining the claim that the impulse alone produces a robust scaling law across regimes.
  2. [Results section] Scaling-law presentation (results section): The rupture boundary is delineated using a threshold constant in the Weber-number versus size-ratio plane. The manuscript must explicitly state whether this constant is obtained from first-principles analysis or calibrated to the experimental data set. The presence of this free parameter (as noted in the axiom ledger) risks reducing the reported criterion to an empirical fit rather than an independent prediction, which is load-bearing for the central claim of a derived scaling law.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'for the first time' is unnecessary and should be removed or replaced with a more precise statement of novelty.
  2. [Figures] Figures: The scaling plots should include error bars on experimental points, clearly indicate the fitted threshold line, and label the two regimes distinctly.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion: The extension to particle-laden droplets is asserted but lacks quantitative details on how the scaling law is modified or any supporting data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped us strengthen the clarity of our theoretical framework and scaling-law presentation. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theory section] The derivation of the non-dimensional Kelvin impulse does not appear to augment the standard expression with image potentials or free-surface corrections for the rigid wall and free-surface boundaries in the thin-layer confinement. Standard Kelvin-impulse theory assumes unbounded fluid or simple images; without these terms the dimensionless group may miss momentum redistribution from surface deformation and wall proximity, undermining the claim that the impulse alone produces a robust scaling law across regimes.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Our derivation employs the standard Kelvin-impulse expression to capture the leading-order jet momentum transferred to the droplet in the thin-layer geometry. While image potentials for the rigid wall and free-surface corrections would account for additional redistribution effects, these represent higher-order contributions whose inclusion would substantially increase analytical complexity without necessarily altering the dominant scaling. The proposed non-dimensional group is validated by the collapse of experimental data across regimes, indicating that boundary-induced corrections are either secondary or effectively subsumed. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Theory section that explicitly discusses these assumptions, justifies the use of the standard form, and notes the potential for future refinements with boundary corrections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] The rupture boundary is delineated using a threshold constant in the Weber-number versus size-ratio plane. The manuscript must explicitly state whether this constant is obtained from first-principles analysis or calibrated to the experimental data set. The presence of this free parameter (as noted in the axiom ledger) risks reducing the reported criterion to an empirical fit rather than an independent prediction, which is load-bearing for the central claim of a derived scaling law.

    Authors: We agree that explicit clarification is required. The functional dependence of the scaling law—combining the non-dimensional Kelvin impulse with the characteristic Weber number and bubble-to-droplet size ratio—is obtained from first-principles dimensional analysis and momentum considerations. The numerical threshold that demarcates the rupture boundary is calibrated to the experimental data set to provide the optimal delineation between regimes. This is standard practice in scaling-law derivations where the prefactor is fixed empirically while the predicted functional form is tested for universality. We will revise the Results section to state this distinction clearly, supply the physical rationale for the threshold, and emphasize that the scaling relation itself retains predictive value, as further supported by its successful extension to particle-laden droplets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of non-dimensional Kelvin impulse and scaling law is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a non-dimensional Kelvin impulse from bubble-jet momentum and uses it to establish a scaling law for the droplet rupture criterion in terms of a characteristic Weber number and bubble-to-droplet size ratio. This is presented as a first-principles hydrodynamic derivation that delineates rupture vs. no-rupture regimes. No specific equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim retains independent content from the momentum representation and does not exhibit renaming of known results or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain is therefore not equivalent to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the non-dimensional Kelvin impulse is the controlling parameter and that the scaling remains predictive once the Weber number and size ratio are fixed; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • rupture threshold constant
    The scaling law requires a critical value separating rupture and no-rupture regimes that is not derived from first principles in the abstract and is therefore likely calibrated to data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Kelvin impulse can be non-dimensionalized to represent jet momentum under free-surface and wall confinement
    This is the core step used to obtain the scaling law.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1309 out tokens · 98368 ms · 2026-05-10T18:31:30.285367+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. E. Brennen,Cavitation and bubble dynamics(Cambridge University Press, 2014). 14

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Maisonhaute, C

    E. Maisonhaute, C. Prado, P. C. White, and R. G. Compton, Surface acoustic cavitation understood via nanosecond electrochemistry. Part III: shear stress in ultrasonic cleaning, Ul- trason. Sonochem.9, 297 (2002)

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    G. L. Chahine, A. Kapahi, J.-K. Choi, and C.-T. Hsiao, Modeling of surface cleaning by cavitation bubble dynamics and collapse, Ultrason. Sonochem.29, 528 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Reuter, S

    F. Reuter, S. R. Gonzalez-Avila, R. Mettin, and C.-D. Ohl, Flow fields and vortex dynamics of bubbles collapsing near a solid boundary, Phys. Rev. Fluids2, 064202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Califano, R

    V. Califano, R. Calabria, and P. Massoli, Experimental evaluation of the effect of emulsion stability on micro-explosion phenomena for water-in-oil emulsions, Fuel117, 87 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    E. Mura, R. Calabria, V. Califano, P. Massoli, and J. Bellettre, Emulsion droplet micro- explosion: Analysis of two experimental approaches, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.56, 69 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    K. A. Raman, J. M. Rossell´ o, and C.-D. Ohl, Cavitation induced oil-in-water emulsification pathways using a single laser-induced bubble, Appl. Phys. Lett.121, 194103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    L. A. Kuznetsova, S. Khanna, N. N. Amso, W. T. Coakley, and A. A. Doinikov, Cavitation bubble-driven cell and particle behavior in an ultrasound standing wave, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    S. L. Gac, E. Zwaan, A. V. D. Berg, and C.-D. Ohl, Sonoporation of suspension cells with a single cavitation bubble in a microfluidic confinement, Lab Chip7, 1666 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    C. C. Coussios and R. A. Roy, Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.40, 395 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Cattaneo, G

    M. Cattaneo, G. Guerriero, G. Shakya, L. A. Krattiger, L. G. Paganella, M. L. Narciso, and O. Supponen, Cyclic jetting enables microbubble-mediated drug delivery, Nat. Phys.21, 590 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    C. E. Brennen, Cavitation in medicine, Interface Focus5, 20150022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Ashoke Raman, J

    K. Ashoke Raman, J. Manuel Rossell´ o, H. Reese, and C.-D. Ohl, Microemulsification from single laser-induced cavitation bubbles, J. Fluid Mech.953, A27 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Z. Ren, H. Han, H. Zeng, C. Sun, Y. Tagawa, Z. Zuo, and S. Liu, Interactions of a collapsing laser-induced cavitation bubble with a hemispherical droplet attached to a rigid boundary, J. Fluid Mech.976, A11 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Z. Ren, Z. Zuo, S. Wu, and S. Liu, Particulate projectiles driven by cavitation bubbles, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 044501 (2022). 15

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Poulain, G

    S. Poulain, G. Guenoun, S. Gart, W. Crowe, and S. Jung, Particle motion induced by bubble cavitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 214501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Y. Zhou, K. Yang, J. Cui, J. Ye, and C. Deng, Controlled permeation of cell membrane by single bubble acoustic cavitation, J. Control. Release157, 103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Y. Yang, Q. Li, X. Guo, J. Tu, and D. Zhang, Mechanisms underlying sonoporation: Interac- tion between microbubbles and cells, Ultrason. Sonochem.67, 105096 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Stepiˇ snik Perdih, M

    T. Stepiˇ snik Perdih, M. Zupanc, and M. Dular, Revision of the mechanisms behind oil- water (O/W) emulsion preparation by ultrasound and cavitation, Ultrason. Sonochem.51, 298 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Orthaber, J

    U. Orthaber, J. Zevnik, R. Petkovˇ sek, and M. Dular, Cavitation bubble collapse in a vicinity of a liquid-liquid interface – Basic research into emulsification process, Ultrason. Sonochem. 68, 105224 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Zevnik, J

    J. Zevnik, J. Patfoort, J. M. Rossell´ o, C.-D. Ohl, and M. Dular, Dynamics of a cavitation bubble confined in a thin liquid layer at null Kelvin impulse, Phys. Fluids36(2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Zwaan, S

    E. Zwaan, S. Le Gac, K. Tsuji, and C.-D. Ohl, Controlled cavitation in microfluidic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 254501 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Jalaal, M

    M. Jalaal, M. Klein Schaarsberg, C.-W. Visser, and D. Lohse, Laser-induced forward transfer of viscoplastic fluids, J. Fluid Mech.880, 497 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    S. R. Gonzalez-Avila, D. M. Nguyen, S. Arunachalam, E. M. Domingues, H. Mishra, and C.- D. Ohl, Mitigating cavitation erosion using biomimetic gas-entrapping microtextured surfaces (GEMS), Sci. Adv.6, eaax6192 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Z. Wei, C. Zhang, C. Shen, Z. Zhu, Meihuiand Xin, L. Wang, and L. Zhao, Manipulation of the collapse direction of the cavitation bubbles near the boundary with attached gas plastron, Phys. Fluids35, 083311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    F. Yuan, C. Yang, and P. Zhong, Cell membrane deformation and bioeffects produced by tandem bubble-induced jetting flow, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.112(2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    J. R. Blake and D. C. Gibson, Cavitation bubbles near boundaries, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 99 (1987)

    work page 1987

  28. [28]

    R. H. Cole,Underwater explosions(Princeton University Press, 1948)

    work page 1948

  29. [29]

    J. P. Best and J. R. Blake, An estimate of the Kelvin impulse of a transient cavity, J. Fluid Mech.261, 75 (1994). 16

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    J. R. Blake and P. Cerone, A note on the impulse due to a vapour bubble near a boundary, J. Aust. Math. Soc. Series B, Appl. Math23, 383 (1982)

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    Supponen, D

    O. Supponen, D. Obreschkow, M. Tinguely, P. Kobel, N. Dorsaz, and M. Farhat, Scaling laws for jets of single cavitation bubbles, J. Fluid Mech.802, 263 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Li, A.-M

    S.-M. Li, A.-M. Zhang, P. Cui, S. Li, and Y.-L. Liu, Vertically neutral collapse of a pulsating bubble at the corner of a free surface and a rigid wall, J. Fluid Mech.962, A28 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Tagawa and I

    Y. Tagawa and I. R. Peters, Bubble collapse and jet formation in corner geometries, Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 081601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Han, A.-M

    R. Han, A.-M. Zhang, S. Tan, and S. Li, Interaction of cavitation bubbles with the interface of two immiscible fluids on multiple time scales, J. Fluid Mech.932, A8 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    J. R. Blake, The Kelvin impulse: application to cavitation bubble dynamics, J. Aust. Math. Soc. Series B, Appl. Math30, 127 (1988)

    work page 1988

  36. [36]

    Huang, J

    J. Huang, J. Wang, W. Guo, and Y. Wang, Wall vortex induced by the collapse of a near-wall cavitation bubble: Influence of the water surface, Phys. Rev. Fluids9, 053602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Vol. 55 (Courier Corporation, 1965)

    work page 1965

  38. [38]

    J. R. Blake, D. M. Leppinen, and Q. Wang, Cavitation and bubble dynamics: the Kelvin impulse and its applications, Interface Focus.5, 20150017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    M. A. Quetzeri-Santiago, I. W. Hunter, D. van der Meer, and D. F. Rivas, Impact of a microfluidic jet on a pendant droplet, Soft Matter17, 7466 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Gvozdyakov and A

    D. Gvozdyakov and A. Zenkov, Improvement of atomization characteristics of coal-water slur- ries, Energy230, 120900 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    K. Noh, H. Kim, S. Kim, and S. Song, Atomization characteristics of slurry fuels using a pressure swirl atomizer, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.304, 104794 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Suhag, N

    R. Suhag, N. Kumar, A. T. Petkoska, and A. Upadhyay, Film formation and deposition methods of edible coating on food products: A review, Food Res. Int.136, 109582 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    O. P. Stebeleva and A. V. Minakov, Application of cavitation in oil processing: An overview of mechanisms and results of treatment, ACS Omega6, 31411 (2021). 17

    work page 2021