pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06175 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-03 · 💻 cs.HC

User-Centric Design of UI for Mobile Banking Apps: Improving UI and Features for Better Customer Experience

Luniva Chitrakar , Ishan Panta , Biplov Paneru , Sangharsh Poudel , Lahana Kansakar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords mobile bankinguser interface designuser experienceusability testingcustomer satisfactionnavigation designsecurity featuresbudgeting tools
0
0 comments X

The pith

User surveys and testing show mobile banking apps need better security, simpler navigation, budgeting tools, and visual design to raise satisfaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper surveys 103 mobile banking users and runs usability tests including Think Aloud sessions and heat maps to find repeated complaints such as navigation problems, slow loading, unclear language, and weak security. It argues that redesigning interfaces around these user preferences, plus Gestalt principles for layout, will increase satisfaction and reduce shifts to third-party apps. A sympathetic reader cares because mobile banking now handles daily finances for many people, so design flaws directly affect convenience and trust. If the findings hold, banks could retain more users by adding requested features like budgeting and reliable biometrics.

Core claim

Through a survey of 103 respondents and methods like Think Aloud testing, heat maps, and guerrilla testing, the study identifies key problems in mobile banking apps including language barriers, lengthy loading times, unclear terminology, and navigational challenges. It reports that 81 percent use the apps regularly yet 77 percent encounter issues, with 44.7 percent turning to third-party services and 84 percent requesting budgeting functions. The central discovery is that user-centric redesigns focused on security, added functionality, simplified navigation, and improved visual design using proximity and symmetry will promote greater happiness and adoption.

What carries the argument

The combination of user survey data with remote usability testing and application of Gestalt psychology principles such as proximity and symmetry to organize app screens and groups.

If this is right

  • Mobile banking apps should add budgeting tools to meet the needs expressed by 84 percent of surveyed users.
  • Navigation and terminology must be simplified to address the navigational challenges and unclear terms reported by many respondents.
  • Security features such as biometric authentication require strengthening to respond to complaints from 46 percent of users.
  • Visual layouts should apply proximity and symmetry to improve grouping and reduce cognitive load.
  • These adjustments would lower the share of users who rely on third-party apps for everyday transactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same survey and testing approach could be repeated in other regions to capture local language and cultural preferences.
  • Banks might track actual usage metrics before and after redesign to confirm whether self-reported preferences translate into higher engagement.
  • Improved language options could expand access for non-native speakers and increase overall adoption rates.
  • Future designs could test whether adding real-time notifications as requested further reduces reliance on external services.

Load-bearing premise

The problems and preferences reported by the 103 survey respondents accurately represent the wider user population and the proposed UI changes will produce measurable improvements in customer experience.

What would settle it

A controlled A/B test of a live mobile banking app that implements the suggested changes and finds no measurable rise in user satisfaction scores or transaction frequency compared with the unchanged version.

read the original abstract

Financial management has been revolutionized by mobile banking, but increasing usefulness and satisfaction requires a better user experience. This study aims to provide an improved customer experience by offering user-friendly interfaces, and real-time notifications by user-centric design of mobile banking application UI. A survey was carried out on the target audience in which 81% of respondents to a study of 103 people said they regularly used mobile banking apps, while 77% said they had problems with the ones they were using at the time. Furthermore, 44.7% of respondents expressed unhappiness with the current solutions by depending on third-party apps like e-Sewa and Khalti for everyday transactions. Language obstacles, lengthy loading times, unclear terminology, and navigational challenges were among the problems found. With 84% asking for a budgeting function and 46% complaining about biometric authentication, users indicated a need for more individualized interfaces, improved customer service, and increased security. The study included Think Aloud testing, heat maps, and remote usability testing to determine user preferences and pain spots to solve these. Feedback from a wider audience was obtained informally through guerrilla usability testing. The results highlight how important it is for mobile banking apps to guarantee security, increase functionality, simplify navigation, and improve visual design. App grouping and layout can be further enhanced by utilizing Gestalt psychology concepts like closeness and symmetry. The goal of these user-centered insights is to promote greater happiness and adoption of mobile banking.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a survey of 103 respondents on mobile banking app usage and pain points, supplemented by Think Aloud, heat map, and guerrilla usability testing. It identifies issues including security concerns, navigation difficulties, language barriers, and lack of features such as budgeting tools, and recommends UI improvements including enhanced biometric security, simplified navigation, real-time notifications, and application of Gestalt principles (proximity, symmetry) for layout and grouping to improve customer experience and adoption.

Significance. If the findings are validated with appropriate controls, the work could supply practical, user-derived design guidelines for mobile banking interfaces in emerging markets, highlighting the value of combining survey data with informal usability methods and Gestalt theory. The emphasis on security and functionality aligns with known HCI priorities in fintech, but the current lack of outcome metrics limits immediate applicability.

major comments (3)
  1. [Survey results] Survey results section: the reported figures (77% experienced problems, 84% requested budgeting tools, 46% dissatisfied with biometrics) are presented without confidence intervals, power analysis, demographic stratification, or any statistical testing, so it is impossible to determine whether they support the general claims about user needs.
  2. [Conclusions] Proposed UI changes and conclusions: the manuscript asserts that the suggested enhancements (security, budgeting, navigation simplification, Gestalt layouts) will improve customer experience, yet no pre/post metrics, task-time measurements, error-rate data, or A/B test results are provided to link the recommendations to observable outcomes.
  3. [Methodology] Usability testing description: Think Aloud, heat-map, and guerrilla testing are named but lack participant counts, protocol details, quantitative outputs, or how findings were triangulated with the survey, leaving the identification of pain points (e.g., loading times, unclear terminology) without traceable evidence.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence '81% of respondents to a study of 103 people' is redundant; rephrase for clarity.
  2. [References] References: add citations to prior HCI literature on mobile banking UX and applications of Gestalt principles in interface design to situate the contribution.
  3. [Figures] Figures/tables: ensure any heat maps or proposed UI mockups are numbered, captioned, and explicitly referenced in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight important areas for improving the rigor and clarity of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of results, methodology, and conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Survey results] Survey results section: the reported figures (77% experienced problems, 84% requested budgeting tools, 46% dissatisfied with biometrics) are presented without confidence intervals, power analysis, demographic stratification, or any statistical testing, so it is impossible to determine whether they support the general claims about user needs.

    Authors: We agree that the survey results would benefit from additional statistical context. The study was exploratory and descriptive rather than hypothesis-driven, which is why formal testing and power analysis were not included originally. In the revision, we will add 95% confidence intervals for the key percentages, include demographic stratification (e.g., by age group and banking experience), and explicitly state the exploratory nature and absence of inferential statistics as a limitation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conclusions] Proposed UI changes and conclusions: the manuscript asserts that the suggested enhancements (security, budgeting, navigation simplification, Gestalt layouts) will improve customer experience, yet no pre/post metrics, task-time measurements, error-rate data, or A/B test results are provided to link the recommendations to observable outcomes.

    Authors: The recommendations are grounded in user-reported needs from the survey and usability sessions together with established HCI principles. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not contain direct outcome measures validating the proposed changes. We will revise the conclusions to frame these as user-informed design recommendations rather than empirically validated improvements, and we will add a section calling for future controlled studies to measure outcomes. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methodology] Usability testing description: Think Aloud, heat-map, and guerrilla testing are named but lack participant counts, protocol details, quantitative outputs, or how findings were triangulated with the survey, leaving the identification of pain points (e.g., loading times, unclear terminology) without traceable evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the usability methods require substantially more detail for traceability. We will expand the methodology section to report participant numbers for each technique, describe the testing protocols and tasks, summarize quantitative observations (such as frequency of noted issues), and explain the process of integrating usability findings with survey responses to derive the pain points. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • We cannot supply pre/post metrics, task completion times, error rates, or A/B test results because the original study design did not include controlled outcome evaluations of the proposed UI changes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical survey claims rest directly on reported user data with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper is a standard user survey and usability study reporting percentages (e.g., 81% regular use, 77% problems, 84% want budgeting) and qualitative feedback from 103 respondents plus informal testing. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical derivations exist. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing premises, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled in. All claims follow directly from the collected data without any reduction to prior inputs by construction, making the derivation chain self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of self-reported survey data and standard usability methods without introducing new mathematical parameters or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Self-reported survey responses and usability test observations accurately reflect users' true preferences and pain points.
    The study bases all recommendations on data from 103 respondents and informal testing without external validation against actual app usage logs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1201 out tokens · 34188 ms · 2026-05-16T08:21:08.195045+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As technology advances, the focus has shifted towards effectively designing software applications designing mobile interactions in the most effective manner

    Introduction Mobile banking applications have transformed the banking industry, offering customers convenient access to financial services through smartphones and tablets. As technology advances, the focus has shifted towards effectively designing software applications designing mobile interactions in the most effective manner. Human -Computer Interaction...

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Loading" or

    Methodology In pursuit of our research objectives, we have employed a diverse range of methodologies to validate the prevailing issues in the field of mobile banking and to accomplish our mission of creating a user -centric mobile banking application. These methodologi es have enabled us to gather comprehensive insights and ensure that our app addresses t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The survey was highly successful, with a total of 104 insightful responses received

    Results and Analysis In order to validate our problem statement and find out what exactly is the problem with the current mobile banking app and what do people want, we conducted a need assessment survey. The survey was highly successful, with a total of 104 insightful responses received. The significant number of participants indicated a strong level of ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Discussion The study findings highlight the prominent challenges related to reliability and usability that hinder the adoption and effectiveness of mobile banking platforms in Nepal. Participants reported various issues and difficulties with complex user interfaces, negatively impacting their satisfaction, trust, and willingness to adopt digital payment p...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Conclusion In conclusion, this work emphasized the importance of incorporating Human -Computer Interaction (HCI) principles in remodeling a mobile banking application to enhance user experience. Through a comprehensive analysis that involved interviews, surveys, prototyping, UI development, and evaluation procedures, we gained valuable insights into user ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C., Han, J., & Ractham, P. (2022). Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) and Trust Factors for the Continuance Intention of Mobile Payment Services. Sustainability. 2

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Bhatt, D. N. V. (2021). An Empirical Study to Evaluate Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction on the Adoption of Mobile Banking Services. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    (2023, May)

    BankMyCell. (2023, May). How many smartphones are in the world? [Online]. Available: https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Nepal Journals Online. (n.d.). Opportunities and Challenges in Mobile Banking in Nepal

    work page

  10. [10]

    (2022, September)

    Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C., Han, J., & Ractham, P. (2022, September). Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) and Trust Factors for the Continuance Intention of Mobile Payment Services. Sustainability

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    (2022, August)

    Yan, J., & Nuangjamnong, C. (2022, August). The Impact of Mobile Banking Service on Customer Satisfaction: A Case Study of Commercial Banks in China. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363007742_The_Impact_of_Mobile_Banking_ Service_on_Customer_Satisfaction_A_Case_Study_of_Commercial_Banks_in_China

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Nagar, D., & Bhatt, V. (2022). An Empirical Study on Customer Satisfaction of Mobile Banking Services. [Online]

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    W., Basit, H

    Hamid, K., Iqbal, M. W., Basit, H. A., Fuzail, Z., Ghafoor, Z. T., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Usability Evaluation of Mobile Banking Applications in the Digital Era. [Online]

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Community Tool Box. (2022). Conducting Needs Assessment Surveys. [Online]. Available: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community- needs-and-resources/conducting-needs-assessment-surveys/main

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Interaction Design Foundation. (n.d.). User Centered Design. [Online]. Available: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/user-centered-design

    work page

  16. [16]

    (2023, March 2)

    Greenan, R. (2023, March 2). What is Miller’s Law in UX Design? A Complete Guide. [Online]. Available: https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/what-is-millers- law/

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Interaction Design Foundation. (2022). Fitts’ Law. [Online]. Available: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/fitts-law

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Interaction Design Foundation. (n.d.). The Gestalt Principles. [Online]. Available: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/gestalt-principles

    work page

  19. [19]

    Nielsen, J. (2020). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ 3

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Paneru, B., Paneru, B., Poudyal, R., & Shah, K. B. (2024, March). Exploring the Nexus of User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) in the Context of Emerging Trends and Customer Experience, Human Computer Interaction, Applications of Artificial Intelligence. INJIISCOM, 5(1), 102-113

    work page 2024