pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06983 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Extinction Distributions in Nearby Star-resolved Galaxies. II. M33

Yuxi Wang (1 , 2) , Yi Ren (1 , Jian Gao (3 , 4) , Bingqiu Chen (5) , Ying Li (1) ((1) Department of Astronomy , College of Physics
show 11 more authors
Electronic Engineering Qilu Normal University (2) Shandong Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration Technology (3) Institute for Frontiers in Astronomy Astrophysics Beijing Normal University (4) School of Physics Astronomy (5) South-Western Institute for Astronomy Research Yunnan University)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords extinction mapM33RGB starsdust distributioninterstellar mediumspiral armscolor excessV-band extinction
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

High-resolution extinction map of M33 from resolved RGB stars reveals dust following spiral arms and hydrogen gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a detailed extinction map for M33 by fitting the multiband colors of its individually resolved red giant branch stars. This yields an angular resolution of about 6 arcseconds, or 24 parsecs, that displays uneven dust across the full disk, clearly marking spiral arms, inter-arm zones, and compact clouds. The map aligns closely with independent distributions of total hydrogen, neutral hydrogen, and carbon monoxide, confirming it traces both diffuse and dense interstellar material. Peak V-band extinction values reach 2.5 magnitudes per pixel with an average near 1.05 magnitudes, supplying a practical basis for correcting dust effects in stellar observations and preparing for future telescope work.

Core claim

By fitting multiband color indexes of individually resolved RGB stars from the PHATTER survey, an extinction map of M33 is constructed at approximately 6 arcsecond resolution. The map reveals the intricate and heterogeneous distribution of dust throughout the entire disk, with distinct delineation of spiral arms, inter-arm regions, and compact dust clouds. It exhibits strong spatial correspondence with the distributions of total hydrogen, H I, and CO. The derived V-band extinction reaches up to 2.5 mag per pixel, with a mean value of about 1.05 mag, providing new insights into the dust structure and a robust foundation for accurate extinction corrections.

What carries the argument

Fitting multiband color indexes of resolved RGB stars to derive color excess and per-pixel extinction values across the galaxy disk.

If this is right

  • The map enables accurate extinction corrections for stellar population studies throughout M33.
  • It traces both diffuse and dense interstellar medium components reliably.
  • It provides a foundation for future studies with telescopes including the Chinese Space Station Telescope.
  • It delineates dust structures aligned with spiral arms and gas distributions at 24 parsec scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same RGB-star fitting method could map dust in other nearby galaxies to compare interstellar medium patterns across different spiral systems.
  • The tight link to molecular gas tracers opens the possibility of using the map to study how dust affects local star formation efficiency within arms.
  • At this resolution the map could reveal whether small dust clouds act as shields or triggers for new star formation on sub-50-parsec scales.

Load-bearing premise

That the intrinsic colors of RGB stars can be modeled accurately enough from multiband photometry for color excesses to isolate dust extinction rather than stellar metallicity or age variations.

What would settle it

If the derived extinction map shows poor spatial correlation with independent dust tracers such as far-infrared emission maps or known compact dust features in M33.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06983 by 2), (2) Shandong Key Laboratory of Space Environment, (3) Institute for Frontiers in Astronomy, 4), (4) School of Physics, (5) South-Western Institute for Astronomy Research, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Beijing Normal University, Bingqiu Chen (5), College of Physics, Electronic Engineering, Exploration Technology, Jian Gao (3, Qilu Normal University, Ying Li (1) ((1) Department of Astronomy, Yi Ren (1, Yunnan University), Yuxi Wang (1.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Color-color diagrams for RGB stars at different metallicities generated with the CMD 3.9 web interface. Gray contours show the observed RGB sample adopted in this work with foreground MW extinction corrected (darker shades indicate higher tracer density), and the red arrows indicate the reddening vector for AV = 1 mag assuming the mean extinction law of M33 (Wang et al. 2022). The sharp cutoff at F475W−F81… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: distribution of the stellar counts in each pixel. Middle panel: distribution of AV variance. Right panel: histogram for AV values over all measured pixels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Extinction distribution in M33 with a resolution of approximately 6′′ . The extinction in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the extinction map constructed in this work and the Spitzer/IRAC 8 µm emission distribution. Left panel: Spitzer/IRAC 8 µm map at 12′′ resolution, with cyan contours showing the mean AV derived in this work. Right panel: pixel-by-pixel comparison, shown as a density plot of AV versus log(I8.0), with colors from red to blue indicating high to low point density. After convolving the extinc… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panels: maps of H (Keilmann et al. 2024, upper left), and H I (Gratier et al. 2010, lower left) column densities, with red contours indicating the mean AV value as determined in this work. Right panels: pixel-by-pixel comparison between extinction values and gas column densities. For each corresponding gas component, the horizontal axis shows the extinction value in the V band for each pixel determine… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left panel: IRAM CO integrated intensity map (Gratier et al. 2010), with red contours indicating the mean AV value as determined in this work. Right panel: a two-dimensional density map (density increases from blue to red) showing the relationship between extinction (AV ; x-axis) and integrated CO intensity (ICO; y-axis). (2022), who combined archival images from UV to IR for young star cluster population,… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extinction maps are essential for tracing interstellar dust and enabling accurate stellar population studies in galaxies. Here, a high-resolution extinction distribution of nearby galaxy M33 is constructed by fitting multiband color indexes of the individually resolved red giant branch (RGB) stars from the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury: Triangulum Extended Region (PHATTER) survey. Achieving an angular resolution of approximately 6$^{\prime\prime}$ ($\sim$ 24.4 pc), the extinction map reveals the intricate and heterogeneous distribution of dust throughout the entire disk of M33, with distinct delineation of spiral arms, inter-arm regions, and compact dust clouds. In addition, it exhibits strong spatial correspondence with the distributions of total hydrogen, H I, and CO, underscoring the reliability of the extinction map for tracing both diffuse and dense components of the interstellar medium. The derived $V$-band extinction reaches up to 2.5 mag per pixel, with a mean value of about 1.05 mag. Beyond providing new insights into the dust structure of M33, the extinction map offers a robust foundation for accurate extinction corrections and will support future studies, including upcoming observations with the Chinese Space Station Telescope.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives a high-resolution (~6 arcsec, ~24 pc) extinction map of M33 by fitting multiband color indices of resolved RGB stars from the PHATTER survey. The map reaches A_V up to 2.5 mag (mean ~1.05 mag) and is reported to delineate spiral arms, inter-arm regions, and compact dust clouds while showing strong spatial correspondence with total hydrogen, H I, and CO distributions.

Significance. If the derived extinctions reliably isolate dust rather than stellar-population effects, the map would supply a useful high-resolution template of dust structure across an entire nearby disk galaxy, supporting extinction corrections for stellar-population work and comparisons with ISM tracers. The reported gas-tracer correlations provide an independent consistency check, but the absence of quantitative validation leaves the robustness of the central claim uncertain.

major comments (3)
  1. The fitting procedure that converts observed colors to extinction (implicitly by subtracting an assumed intrinsic RGB locus) is not described with sufficient detail on how the locus is constructed or tested. Given M33’s documented radial metallicity gradient of ~0.03–0.05 dex kpc⁻¹ and mixed-age RGB populations, any mismatch between the assumed locus and local stellar properties will be absorbed into the extinction values, potentially imprinting spurious structure that correlates with star-formation history rather than dust alone.
  2. No synthetic-data tests or error-propagation analysis are presented to quantify how uncertainties in the intrinsic-color model, photometric errors, and population variations propagate into the final A_V map. Without these, the claimed “strong spatial correspondence” with gas tracers cannot be distinguished from possible correlated biases arising from the same underlying stellar-density field.
  3. The resolution and pixel-by-pixel A_V statistics (maximum 2.5 mag, mean 1.05 mag) are stated without an accompanying assessment of how the method behaves in low-density inter-arm regions versus dense arms, where the RGB sampling density and metallicity spread differ; this directly affects the reliability of the heterogeneous-dust claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the exact number of RGB stars used and the typical photometric depth in each band to allow readers to gauge sampling completeness.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the color scale, units, and any smoothing applied to the extinction map and the comparison gas-tracer images.
  3. A short discussion of how the adopted extinction curve (or zero-point) was chosen, and whether alternative curves were tested, would clarify the systematic uncertainty budget.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments point by point below. We agree that additional methodological details and validation are warranted and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the presentation and robustness of the extinction map.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The fitting procedure that converts observed colors to extinction (implicitly by subtracting an assumed intrinsic RGB locus) is not described with sufficient detail on how the locus is constructed or tested. Given M33’s documented radial metallicity gradient of ~0.03–0.05 dex kpc⁻¹ and mixed-age RGB populations, any mismatch between the assumed locus and local stellar properties will be absorbed into the extinction values, potentially imprinting spurious structure that correlates with star-formation history rather than dust alone.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section requires more explicit detail on locus construction and testing to address potential biases from the metallicity gradient and mixed stellar populations. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to describe how the intrinsic RGB locus was derived from the PHATTER photometry (including selection criteria and any radial binning), how local adjustments were applied to mitigate the known ~0.03–0.05 dex kpc⁻¹ gradient, and the tests performed against independent radial metallicity measurements and model isochrones. We will also discuss the expected residual impact of age-metallicity degeneracies on the derived A_V values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No synthetic-data tests or error-propagation analysis are presented to quantify how uncertainties in the intrinsic-color model, photometric errors, and population variations propagate into the final A_V map. Without these, the claimed “strong spatial correspondence” with gas tracers cannot be distinguished from possible correlated biases arising from the same underlying stellar-density field.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the lack of quantitative synthetic tests and formal error propagation leaves the robustness of the gas-tracer correlations less certain than we claimed. We will add a new subsection (and supporting appendix) that presents Monte Carlo simulations using synthetic RGB populations with realistic photometric errors, metallicity spreads, and age variations drawn from the PHATTER catalog. These tests will quantify the contribution of each uncertainty source to the final A_V map and will include a direct check for spurious correlations between derived A_V and stellar-density or star-formation tracers that are independent of dust. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The resolution and pixel-by-pixel A_V statistics (maximum 2.5 mag, mean 1.05 mag) are stated without an accompanying assessment of how the method behaves in low-density inter-arm regions versus dense arms, where the RGB sampling density and metallicity spread differ; this directly affects the reliability of the heterogeneous-dust claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit regional reliability assessment is needed to support the claim of heterogeneous dust structure. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated analysis that compares RGB sampling density, photometric uncertainty distributions, and A_V statistics between spiral-arm and inter-arm regions (using the same 6-arcsec pixels). This will include maps and histograms demonstrating that the method remains stable in lower-density areas and that the reported maximum and mean A_V values are not driven solely by high-density arm regions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: extinction map derived from external photometry fitting to assumed stellar locus

full rationale

The derivation constructs the extinction map by fitting multiband color indices of resolved RGB stars from the independent PHATTER survey photometry to an assumed intrinsic color locus, yielding A_V values per pixel. This is a standard forward-modeling procedure that does not reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The reported spatial correspondence with H, HI, and CO is presented as post-derivation validation, not an input to the map itself. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit the enumerated circular patterns; the central result rests on external data and modeling assumptions rather than tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in stellar photometry and the availability of the PHATTER survey data; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Extinction curve shape or zero-point offsets
    Color-index fitting typically requires an assumed or fitted extinction law or calibration offsets to convert color excess to A_V.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption RGB stars possess a sufficiently narrow and predictable intrinsic color locus that can be modeled from isochrones or empirical templates
    This assumption underpins the separation of observed color excess into extinction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1282 out tokens · 63780 ms · 2026-05-10T18:10:16.311084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bell, C. P. M., Cioni, M.-R. L., Wright, A. H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 993, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2786 —. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 824, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1545

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2786 2020

  2. [2]

    2012, , 757, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

    Berry, M., Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Sesar, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/2/166 2012

  3. [3]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 2016

  4. [4]

    Q., Guo, H

    Chen, B. Q., Guo, H. L., Gao, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1317, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac072

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac072 2022

  5. [5]

    Q., Schultheis, M., Jiang, B

    Chen, B. Q., Schultheis, M., Jiang, B. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219682 19

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219682 2013

  6. [6]

    Q., Liu, X

    Chen, B. Q., Liu, X. W., Yuan, H. B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1192

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1192 2014

  7. [7]

    Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen’s astrophysical quantities

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    J., Fouesneau, M., Hogg, D

    Dalcanton, J. J., Fouesneau, M., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/3

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/3 2015

  9. [9]

    A., Cohen, S

    Dale, D. A., Cohen, S. A., Johnson, L. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 517, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/517

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/517 2009

  10. [10]

    D., Andrews, J

    Decleir, M., Gordon, K. D., Andrews, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe 2022

  11. [11]

    D., et al

    Dong, H., Li, Z., Wang, Q. D., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2262, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw778

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw778 2016

  12. [12]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al

    Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/172 2014

  14. [14]

    Bohlin, R., & Clayton, G. C. 2019, ApJ, 886, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a 2019

  15. [15]

    L., Wilson, C

    Freedman, W. L., Wilson, C. D., & Madore, B. F. 1991, ApJ, 372, 455, doi: 10.1086/169991

    work page doi:10.1086/169991 1991

  16. [16]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2202.01868

    Galliano, F. 2022, Habilitation Thesis, 1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.01868

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.01868 2022

  17. [17]

    Galliano, F., Galametz, M., & Jones, A. P. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 673, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051900

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051900 2018

  18. [18]

    W., & Li, A

    Gao, J., Jiang, B. W., & Li, A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/89

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/1/89 2009

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Gao, J., Jiang, B. W., Li, A., & Xue, M. Y. 2013, ApJ, 776, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/7

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/7 2013

  20. [20]

    2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    Gordon, K. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07023 2024

  21. [21]

    D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G. C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1320, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/1320 2009

  22. [22]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 2023

  23. [23]

    H., & Misselt, K

    Rieke, G. H., & Misselt, K. A. 1999, ApJ, 519, 165, doi: 10.1086/307350

    work page doi:10.1086/307350 1999

  24. [24]

    D., Misselt, K

    Gordon, K. D., Misselt, K. A., Bouwman, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 G´ orski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 2021

  25. [25]

    J., et al

    Gratier, P., Braine, J., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 522, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014441

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014441 2010

  26. [26]

    L., Chen, B

    Guo, H. L., Chen, B. Q., Yuan, H. B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc68a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc68a 2021

  27. [27]

    Hagen, L. M. Z. 2017, PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Irwin, M. J. 2013, in Thirty Years of Astronomical Discovery with UKIRT, Vol. 37, 229, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7432-2 21

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7432-2 2013

  29. [29]

    C., & Panchal, A

    Joshi, Y. C., & Panchal, A. 2019, A&A, 628, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834574 20

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834574 2019

  30. [30]

    2024, A&A, 688, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349027

    Keilmann, E., Buchbender, C., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349027

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349027 2024

  31. [31]

    2024, ApJL, 968, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c7

    Li, J., Chen, B., Jiang, B., Gao, J., & Chen, X. 2024, ApJL, 968, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c7 2024

  32. [32]

    2025, AJ, 170, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/add14e

    Li, Y., Jiang, B., & Ren, Y. 2025, AJ, 170, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/add14e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/add14e 2025

  33. [33]

    2022, AJ, 163, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac324e

    Moeller, C., & Calzetti, D. 2022, AJ, 163, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac324e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac324e 2022

  34. [34]

    M., Cassisi, S., Casagrande, L., Yuan, W., & Riess, A

    Nataf, D. M., Cassisi, S., Casagrande, L., Yuan, W., & Riess, A. G. 2021, ApJ, 910, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe530

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe530 2021

  35. [35]

    1973, Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies

    Nilson, P. 1973, Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies

    work page 1973

  36. [36]

    2021, ApJ, 907, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcda5

    Ren, Y., Jiang, B., Yang, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 907, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcda5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcda5 2021

  37. [37]

    2013, A&A Rv, 21, 61, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8

    Rix, H.-W., & Bovy, J. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 61, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0061-8 2013

  38. [38]

    2012, SVO Filter Profile Service Version 1.0, IVOA Working Draft 15 October 2012, doi: 10.5479/ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R

    Rodrigo, C., Solano, E., & Bayo, A. 2012, SVO Filter Profile Service Version 1.0, IVOA Working Draft 15 October 2012, doi: 10.5479/ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R

    work page doi:10.5479/ads/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015r 2012

  39. [39]

    2020, ApJL, 905, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abccc4

    Ruoyi, Z., & Haibo, Y. 2020, ApJL, 905, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abccc4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abccc4 2020

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Salim, S., & Narayanan, D. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933 2020

  41. [41]

    Q., Jiang, B

    Schultheis, M., Chen, B. Q., Jiang, B. W., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322788

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322788 2014

  42. [42]

    M., Skowron, J., Udalski, A., et al

    Skowron, D. M., Skowron, J., Udalski, A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 252, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abcb81

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abcb81 2021

  43. [43]

    J., Williams, B

    Smercina, A., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf3e8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf3e8 2023

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., & Origlia, L. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 815, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08249.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08249.x 2004

  45. [45]

    Verley, S., Corbelli, E., Giovanardi, C., & Hunt, L. K. 2009, A&A, 493, 453, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810566

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810566 2009

  46. [46]

    W., Li, A., & Chen, Y

    Wang, S., Gao, J., Jiang, B. W., Li, A., & Chen, Y. 2013, ApJ, 773, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/30

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/30 2013

  47. [47]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac63c1 —

    Wang, Y., Gao, J., Ren, Y., & Chen, B. 2022, ApJS, 260, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac63c1 —. 2025, AJ, 169, 250, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adc0a6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac63c1 2022

  48. [48]

    2025, Extinction Distribution in M33, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17393995

    Wang, Y., Ren, Y., Gao, J., Chen, B., & Li, Y. 2025, Extinction Distribution in M33, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17393995

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17393995 2025

  49. [49]

    F., Lang, D., Dalcanton, J

    Williams, B. F., Lang, D., Dalcanton, J. J., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/9 2014

  50. [50]

    F., Durbin, M

    Williams, B. F., Durbin, M. J., Dalcanton, J. J., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abdf4e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abdf4e 2021

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1191, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1191 21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1191 2010

  52. [52]

    W., Gao, J., et al

    Xue, M., Jiang, B. W., Gao, J., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 23, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/23

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/23 2016