pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07117 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Magnetic order and excitations in the magnetically intercalated van der Waals material Cr_{frac{1}{4}}NbSe₂

Ryota Yamaoka , Hiraku Saito , Yuki Settai , Xiang Huang , Daisuke Nishio-Hamane , Shingo Takahashi , Daichi Ueta , Tatsuro Oda
show 5 more authors
Hodaka Kikuchi Tao Hong Masaki Nakano Shinichiro Seki Taro Nakajima
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords van der Waals magnetsantiferromagnetic orderneutron scatteringspin-wave theoryintercalated materialstriangular latticemagnetic excitations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cr1/4NbSe2 orders in a 120-degree antiferromagnetic structure with dominant out-of-plane ferromagnetic couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes through neutron scattering that the intercalated van der Waals compound Cr1/4NbSe2 orders magnetically in a 120-degree antiferromagnetic structure with wave vector q equal to one-third along both in-plane directions. Inelastic measurements map the spin excitations, which match linear spin-wave calculations only when out-of-plane ferromagnetic couplings are stronger than the in-plane antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor ones. This leads to the conclusion that the magnetism has three-dimensional character despite the layered crystal structure, arising from longer-range interactions carried by conduction electrons. Sympathetic readers would care because it shows how magnetic dimensionality can transcend the structural layers in such materials.

Core claim

By unpolarized and polarized neutron scattering experiments, we have revealed that the magnetic ground state of this system is a 120°-type antiferromagnetic order characterized by the magnetic propagation wave vector of q=(1/3, 1/3, 0). We also performed inelastic neutron scattering measurements using co-aligned single crystals, and determined dispersion relations of magnetic excitations at low temperatures. Comparing the observed spectra with calculations based on the linear spin-wave theory, we revealed that the out-of-plane ferromagnetic interaction is fairly strong as compared to the in-plane nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic interaction. Although the crystal structure of this system is

What carries the argument

The 120°-type antiferromagnetic order with propagation vector q=(1/3, 1/3, 0) on the triangular lattice of Cr3+ ions, together with the exchange interactions fitted via linear spin-wave theory to the measured dispersions.

If this is right

  • The magnetic excitations are well described by linear spin-wave theory incorporating strong out-of-plane ferromagnetic coupling.
  • The system displays three-dimensional magnetic order due to conduction-electron-mediated long-range interactions.
  • The van der Waals layers do not confine the magnetism to two dimensions in this intercalated compound.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This implies that intercalating magnetic ions between van der Waals layers can induce effective three-dimensional magnetic behavior through electron mediation.
  • Similar effects might be observable in other magnetically intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides.
  • Further studies could test whether pressure or doping alters the relative strength of these interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The linear spin-wave theory with a minimal set of exchange interactions accurately captures the observed excitation spectra without needing additional terms or higher-order effects.

What would settle it

A neutron scattering experiment that finds magnetic excitation branches or intensities inconsistent with the fitted spin-wave model using only the reported exchange parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07117 by Daichi Ueta, Daisuke Nishio-Hamane, Hiraku Saito, Hodaka Kikuchi, Masaki Nakano, Ryota Yamaoka, Shingo Takahashi, Shinichiro Seki, Tao Hong, Taro Nakajima, Tatsuro Oda, Xiang Huang, Yuki Settai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of CrNb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. [(a),(b)] Magnetic elastic scattering intensity ma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The in-plane 120 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Scattering profiles of the magnetic Bragg reflec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Magnetic excitation spectrum along the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) The definition of the intra-layer and inter-layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) The backscattered electron image of a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Constant-energy cuts of the excitation spectra alo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cr$_{\frac{1}{4}}$NbSe$_2$ is a triangular lattice magnet in which magnetic Cr$^{3+}$ ions are intercalated to form triangular lattices between NbSe$_2$ van der Waals layers stacked along the c axis. By unpolarized and polarized neutron scattering experiments, we have revealed that the magnetic ground state of this system is a 120$^{\circ}$-type antiferromagnetic order characterized by the magnetic propagation wave vector of $q=(\frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{3}, 0)$. We also performed inelastic neutron scattering measurements using co-aligned single crystals, and determined dispersion relations of magnetic excitations at low temperatures. Comparing the observed spectra with calculations based on the linear spin-wave theory, we revealed that the out-of-plane ferromagnetic interaction is fairly strong as compared to the in-plane nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic interaction. Although the crystal structure of this system is composed of two-dimensional van der Waals layers, the magnetic order has a three dimensional character, which would be attributed to long-range magnetic interactions mediated by conduction electrons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports unpolarized and polarized neutron diffraction on Cr_{1/4}NbSe_2 that establishes a 120°-type antiferromagnetic ground state with propagation vector q=(1/3,1/3,0). Inelastic neutron scattering on co-aligned crystals maps the low-temperature magnetic excitations, which are compared to linear spin-wave theory on a minimal two-parameter Heisenberg model (in-plane nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic J_in and out-of-plane ferromagnetic J_out). The authors conclude that J_out is relatively strong compared with J_in, imparting three-dimensional character to the order via long-range conduction-electron-mediated interactions despite the van der Waals layering.

Significance. If the minimal-model LSWT comparison is robust, the work supplies a concrete experimental example of how intercalated moments in a vdW host can acquire three-dimensional magnetic order through RKKY-like couplings. The polarized-neutron confirmation of the propagation vector and order type is a direct experimental strength, and the inelastic data plus model comparison offer a quantitative handle on the relative interaction strengths that can be tested in related triangular-lattice intercalates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Inelastic neutron scattering and spin-wave analysis section] The central quantitative claim—that the out-of-plane ferromagnetic interaction is 'fairly strong' relative to the in-plane antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interaction—rests entirely on the adequacy of a two-parameter linear spin-wave model. The manuscript does not report goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ², residual maps), uncertainties on the fitted J_in and J_out values, or explicit tests of whether adding single-ion anisotropy, next-nearest-neighbor exchanges, or longer-range terms improves the description of the observed dispersion, intensities, or polarization dependence. This omission directly affects the reliability of the extracted ratio and the inference of three-dimensional character.
  2. [Magnetic structure determination] While the polarized diffraction data are stated to support the 120° structure with q=(1/3,1/3,0), the manuscript should demonstrate that this configuration is uniquely preferred over other possible multi-q or modulated states by showing the full set of magnetic Bragg peak intensities and the refinement statistics (R-factors or equivalent).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main conclusions but omits the numerical values (with uncertainties) of the fitted exchange parameters; these should be added so that the phrase 'fairly strong' is immediately quantifiable.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the inelastic spectra should explicitly state the energy and momentum resolution, the temperature, and whether the data are integrated over a particular polarization channel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the manuscript is missing quantitative details, we will revise to include them.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Inelastic neutron scattering and spin-wave analysis section] The central quantitative claim—that the out-of-plane ferromagnetic interaction is 'fairly strong' relative to the in-plane antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interaction—rests entirely on the adequacy of a two-parameter linear spin-wave model. The manuscript does not report goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ², residual maps), uncertainties on the fitted J_in and J_out values, or explicit tests of whether adding single-ion anisotropy, next-nearest-neighbor exchanges, or longer-range terms improves the description of the observed dispersion, intensities, or polarization dependence. This omission directly affects the reliability of the extracted ratio and the inference of three-dimensional character.

    Authors: We agree that explicit fit-quality metrics and parameter uncertainties were omitted and should be added. In the revised manuscript we will report the χ² value, include residual maps of the dispersion and intensities, and quote uncertainties on J_in and J_out obtained from the least-squares fit. We have also tested extensions that include single-ion anisotropy and next-nearest-neighbor in-plane exchanges; these terms do not produce statistically significant improvements to the description of the observed spectra or polarization dependence. The results of these tests will be summarized in the revised text (or supplementary material) to justify retention of the minimal two-parameter model. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Magnetic structure determination] While the polarized diffraction data are stated to support the 120° structure with q=(1/3,1/3,0), the manuscript should demonstrate that this configuration is uniquely preferred over other possible multi-q or modulated states by showing the full set of magnetic Bragg peak intensities and the refinement statistics (R-factors or equivalent).

    Authors: We accept that a more complete presentation of the refinement is required to demonstrate uniqueness. The revised manuscript will contain a table listing all observed and calculated magnetic Bragg intensities (both unpolarized and polarized data sets) together with the magnetic R-factor. These data, combined with the polarized-neutron constraints on moment directions, rule out the principal alternative multi-q and modulated structures that were considered during the analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation rests on direct experimental observation and standard model comparison

full rationale

The 120° antiferromagnetic order with q=(1/3,1/3,0) is reported as directly measured via polarized and unpolarized neutron diffraction on the propagation vector. Dispersion relations are measured by inelastic neutron scattering on co-aligned crystals and compared to linear spin-wave theory on a minimal two-parameter Heisenberg model (in-plane antiferromagnetic J and out-of-plane ferromagnetic J'). The statement that the out-of-plane interaction is 'fairly strong' is the outcome of this data-to-model comparison, not a redefinition or self-consistent fit that forces the ratio by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are invoked to justify the central claims. The chain is self-contained against external neutron-scattering benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on fitting a small number of Heisenberg exchange constants to the inelastic spectra within linear spin-wave theory; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • in-plane nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange J_in
    Fitted to match the observed dispersion bandwidth and gap.
  • out-of-plane ferromagnetic exchange J_out
    Fitted to reproduce the strong interlayer coupling inferred from the data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear spin-wave theory provides an adequate description of the low-temperature excitations in this S=3/2 triangular lattice system.
    Invoked when comparing calculated dispersion to measured inelastic spectra.
  • domain assumption The magnetic interactions can be captured by a minimal Heisenberg model with nearest-neighbor in-plane and out-of-plane terms.
    Used to interpret the relative strength of J_out versus J_in.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1424 out tokens · 41119 ms · 2026-05-10T17:22:49.090273+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.-G. Park, K. Zhang, H. Cheong, J. H. Kim, C. A. Belvin, D. Hsieh, H. Ning, and N. Gedik, 2D van der Waals magnets: From fundamental physics to applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. , (2026)

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    J.-U. Lee, S. Lee, J. H. Ryoo, S. Kang, T. Y. Kim, P. Kim, C.-H. Park, J.-G. Park, and H. Cheong, Ising- Type Magnetic Ordering in Atomically Thin FePS 3, Nano Letters 16, 7433 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Lan¸ con, H

    D. Lan¸ con, H. C. Walker, E. Ressouche, B. Oulad- diaf, K. C. Rule, G. J. McIntyre, T. J. Hicks, H. M. Rønnow, and A. R. Wildes, Magnetic structure and magnon dynamics of the quasi-two-dimensional antifer- romagnet FePS3, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214407 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Lan¸ con, R

    D. Lan¸ con, R. A. Ewings, T. Guidi, F. Formisano, and A. R. Wildes, Magnetic exchange parameters and anisotropy of the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet NiPS3, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    A. R. Wildes, B. Roessli, B. Lebech, and K. W. Godfrey, Spin waves and the critical behaviour of the magneti- zation in MnPS 3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 6417 (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-Dependent Ferromagnetism in a van der Waals Crystal down to the Monolayer Limit, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of Intrinsic Ferro- magnetism in Two-Dimensional van der Waals Crystals, Nature 546, 265 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable Room-Temperature Ferro- magnetism in Two-Dimensional Fe 3GeTe2, Nature 563, 94 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    van Laar, H

    B. van Laar, H. M. Rietveld, and D. J. W. Ijdo, Mag- netic and Crystallographic Structures of Me xNbS2 and MexTaS2, J. Solid State Chem. 3, 154 (1971)

    work page 1971

  10. [10]

    Togawa, T

    Y. Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y. Kousaka, J. Akimitsu, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, A. S. Ovchinnikov, and J.-i. Kishine, Chiral Magnetic Soliton Lattice on a Chiral Helimagnet, Phys.l Rev. Lett. 108, 107202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Obeysekera, K

    C. Obeysekera, K. A. H. Gamage, D. H. Patabendige, H. Dissanayake, G. Zhong, A. Miura, K. Yoshimura, and R. Ang, The Magneto-Transport Properties of Cr 1/3TaS2 with Chiral Magnetic Solitons, Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2100031 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    P. Park, W. Cho, C. Kim, Y. An, Y.-G. Kang, M. Avdeev, R. Sibille, K. Iida, R. Kajimoto, K. H. Lee, W. Ju, E.-J. Cho, H.-J. Noh, M. J. Han, S.-S. Zhang, C. D. Batista, and J.-G. Park, Tetrahedral triple- Q mag- netic ordering and large spontaneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangular antiferromagnet Co 1/3TaS2, Nat. Commun. 14, 8346 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Takagi, R

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Sponta- neous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar an- tiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals ma- terials, Nat. Phys. 19 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    S. Wu, Z. Xu, S. C. Haley, S. F. Weber, A. Acharya, E. Maniv, Y. Qiu, A. A. Aczel, N. S. Settineri, J. B. Neaton, J. G. Analytis, and R. J. Birgeneau, Highly tun- able magnetic phases in transition-metal dichalcogenide Fe1/ 3+δ NbS2, Physical Review X 12, 021003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Y. An, P. Park, C. Kim, K. Zhang, H. Kim, M. Avdeev, J. Kim, M.-J. Han, H.-J. Noh, S. Seong, J.-S. Kang, H.-D. Kim, and J.-G. Park, Bulk properties of the chi- ral metallic triangular antiferromagnets Ni 1/3NbS2 and Ni1/3TaS2, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054418 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    A. F. Gubkin, E. P. Proskurina, Y. Kousaka, E. M. Sherokalova, A. N. Vasiliev, M. Matsuda, A. V. Malishev, H. Ueda, G. Ehlers, A. Podlesnyak, and J. Akimitsu, Crystal and Magnetic Structures of Cr 1/ 3NbSe2 from Neutron Diffraction, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 013903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Husremovi´ c, C

    S. Husremovi´ c, C. K. Groschner, K. Inzani, I. M. Craig, K. C. Bustillo, P. Ercius, N. P. Kazmierczak, J. Syndikus, M. Van Winkle, S. Aloni, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. M. Griffin, and D. K. Bediako, Hard Ferromagnetism Down to the Thinnest Limit of Iron-Intercalated Tanta- lum Disulfide, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 12167 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Hatanaka, T

    T. Hatanaka, T. Nomoto, and R. Arita, Magnetic inter- actions in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides : A study based on ab initio model construction, Phys.l Rev. B 107, 184429 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    H. C. Mandujano, G. S. Salas, T. Li, P. Y. Zavalij, A. Manj´ on-Sanz, N. P. Butch, and E. E. Rodriguez, Itinerant A-type antiferromagnetic order in Co 1/ 4TaSe2, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144420 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L. S. Xie, S. S. Fender, C. Mollazadeh, W. Fang, M. D. Frontzek, S. Husremovi´ c, K. Li, I. M. Craig, B. H. Goodge, M. P. Erodici, J. D. Gonzalez, Oscar Denlinger, Y. Ping, and D. K. Bediako, Anomalous hall effect from inter-superlattice scattering in a noncollinear antiferr o- magnet, Nat. Commun. 16, 5711 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    J. M. Voorhoeve, N. G. E. van den Berg, and M. Robbins, Intercalation of the Niobium-Diselenide Layer Structure by First-Row Transition Metals, J. Solid State Chem. 1, 134 (1970)

    work page 1970

  22. [22]

    Voorhoeve-van Den Berg and R

    J. Voorhoeve-van Den Berg and R. Sherwood, Low- temperature magnetic susceptibilities of NbSe 2 contain- ing the first-row transition metals, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32, 167 (1971)

    work page 1971

  23. [23]

    N. M. Toporova, E. M. Sherokalova, N. V. Selezneva, V. V. Ogloblichev, and N. V. Baranov, Crystal struc- ture, properties and Griffiths-like phase in niobium dis- elenide intercalated with chromium, J. Alloys Compd. 848, 156534 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Nakajima, H

    T. Nakajima, H. Saito, N. Kobayashi, T. Kawasaki, T. Nakamura, H. Kawano-Furukawa, S. Asai, and T. Ma- suda, Polarized and Unpolarized Neutron Scattering for Magnetic Materials at the Triple-axis Spectrometer PONTA in JRR-3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 091002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    S. Itoh, T. Yokoo, S. Satoh, S. ichiro Yano, D. Kawana, J. Suzuki, and T. J. Sato, High Resolution Chopper Spec- trometer (HRC) at J-PARC, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 631 , 90 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Azuah, L

    R. Azuah, L. Kneller, P. Qiu, Y.and Tregenna-Piggott, C. Brown, J. Copley, and R. Dimeo, DA VE: A compre- hensive software suite for the reduction, visualization, and analysis of low energy neutron spectroscopic data, 13 J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan. Technol. 114, 341 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    A. R. Wildes, B. F ˚ ak, U. B. Hansen, M. Enderle, J. R. Stewart, L. Testa, H. M. Rønnow, C. Kim, and J.-G. Park, Spin wave spectra of single crystal CoPS 3, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054438 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    J. A. Schneeloch, Y. Tao, Y. Cheng, L. Daemen, G. Xu, Q. Zhang, and D. Louca, Gapless Dirac magnons in CrCl3, npj Quantum Mater. 7 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    L. Chen, J. Zhang, X. Zhong, B. Li, and H. Wang, Mag- netic exchange interactions in the layered ferromagnet CrI3, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 054002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    S. E. Nikitin, B. F ˚ ak, K. W. Kr¨ amer, T. Fennell, B. Nor- mand, A. M. L¨ auchli, and C. R¨ uegg, Thermal evolution of dirac magnons in the honeycomb ferromagnet crbr 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 127201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Calder, A

    S. Calder, A. V. Haglund, Y. Liu, D. M. Pajerowski, H. B. Cao, T. J. Williams, V. O. Garlea, and D. Mandrus, Mag- netic structure and exchange interactions in the layered semiconductor CrPS 4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 024408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Li, J.-Q

    B. Li, J.-Q. Yan, D. M. Pajerowski, E. Gordon, A.-M. Nedi´ c, Y. Sizyuk, L. Ke, P. P. Orth, D. Vaknin, and R. J. McQueeney, Competing Magnetic Interactions in the Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator MnBi 2Te4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167204 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    B. K. Saika, S. Hamao, Y. Majima, X. Huang, H. Matsuoka, S. Yoshida, M. Kitamura, M. Sakano, T. Hatanaka, T. Nomoto, M. Hirayama, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, R. Arita, Y. Iwasa, M. Nakano, and K. Ishizaka, Signature of topological band crossing in fer- romagnetic Cr 1/ 3NbSe2 epitaxial thin film, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042021 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Stock, S

    C. Stock, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Nambu, K. Onuma, Y. Maeno, and J.-H. Chung, Neutron- Scattering Measurement of Incommensurate Short- Range Order in Single Crystals of the S=1 Triangular Antiferromagnet NiGa 2S4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Nambu, J

    Y. Nambu, J. S. Gardner, D. E. MacLaughlin, C. Stock, H. Endo, S. Jonas, T. J. Sato, S. Nakatsuji, and C. Bro- holm, Spin Fluctuations from Hertz to Terahertz on a Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Ehlers, A

    G. Ehlers, A. A. Podlesnyak, M. Frontzek, R. S. Freitas, L. Ghivelder, J. S. Gardner, S. V. Shiryaev, and S. Bar- ilo, A detailed study of the magnetic phase transition in CuCrO2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 496009 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011)

    work page 2011