arxiv: 2604.07150 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: unknown

CRB-Based Waveform Optimization for MIMO ISAC Systems With One-Bit ADCs

Qi Lin , Hong Shen , Wei Xu , Chunming Zhao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP

keywords MIMO ISACone-bit ADCswaveform optimizationCramér-Rao boundpoint-like targetextended targetADMM

0 comments

The pith

Waveform optimization via one-bit CRBs jointly improves sensing and communication in MIMO ISAC

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that novel Cramér-Rao bounds which incorporate one-bit ADC quantization distortion can serve as reliable guides for designing transmit waveforms in MIMO integrated sensing and communication systems. A sympathetic reader would care because one-bit converters cut hardware cost and power draw but add nonlinear distortion that standard performance bounds ignore, potentially blocking low-cost ISAC use. The work derives separate bounds for point-like and extended targets, creates matching estimators, and solves a nonconvex optimization that trades off these bounds against communication symbol error probability under a total power limit.

Core claim

Two novel CRBs are proposed for point-like and extended targets to capture quantization distortion effects on estimation accuracy; associated estimation methods are developed to approach the bounds; and an ADMM framework with majorization-minimization solves the resulting nonconvex bi-criterion waveform design problem that minimizes the CRBs subject to a symbol error probability constraint and a power constraint.

What carries the argument

Quantization-aware CRB expressions for MIMO ISAC parameter estimation, employed as nonconvex objectives in a joint sensing-communication waveform optimization solved by alternating direction method of multipliers combined with majorization-minimization.

If this is right

The derived one-bit CRBs tightly characterize quantized estimation performance for both point-like and extended targets.
The proposed estimation methods outperform existing benchmark schemes in approaching the CRBs.
The ADMM-MM solver achieves a controllable trade-off between CRB sensing accuracy and symbol error probability under power limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same CRB-driven approach could extend to multi-bit quantization or other hardware constraints such as phase noise.
Real-time implementation would require checking whether the offline-optimized waveforms remain effective under channel variations or mobility.
Similar optimization might reduce the sensing penalty in other low-power ISAC architectures beyond MIMO.

Load-bearing premise

The one-bit quantization distortion model used to derive the CRBs remains accurate enough that optimizing waveforms against it produces meaningful real-world performance gains.

What would settle it

Hardware tests with actual one-bit ADCs in which the optimized waveforms fail to reduce target estimation error below that of unoptimized waveforms or fail to keep the gap to the CRB consistent with simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07150 by Chunming Zhao, Hong Shen, Qi Lin, Wei Xu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Residual and objective convergence of the ADMM-MMPGD algorithm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Residual and objective convergence of the ADMM-MMCF algorithm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: CRB versus the SEP requirement ε for the proposed and benchmark schemes (Nt = Nr = 16, K = 4, and L = 20). scheme (previously evaluated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper studies the transmit waveform optimization for a quantized multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system, where one-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are employed to enable a low-cost and power-efficient hardware implementation. Focusing on the parameter estimation task, we propose two novel Cram\'er-Rao bounds (CRBs) for both point-like target (PT) and extended target (ET) to characterize the impact of quantization distortion on the estimation accuracy, where associated estimation methods are also developed to approach these theoretical CRBs. Moreover, with the goal of jointly enhancing the sensing and communication performances, we formulate the bi-criterion ISAC waveform optimization problem by minimizing the derived CRB objectives subject to a communication symbol error probability (SEP) constraint and a total power constraint, which, due to the high nonlinearity of the one-bit CRBs, are extremely nonconvex. To yield a high-quality suboptimal solution, we develop an efficient alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework which exploits the majorization-minimization (MM) technique to address the nonconvex issue. Simulation results verify that the one-bit CRBs are tight for characterizing the quantized estimation performance and the proposed estimation methods also show clear performance advantages over the existing benchmark schemes. Furthermore, a flexible trade-off between the CRB and the SEP performance can be achieved by the developed ADMM framework, demonstrating the effectiveness of the optimized ISAC waveform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives one-bit CRBs for MIMO ISAC sensing on point and extended targets plus an ADMM-MM waveform optimizer that meets SEP and power constraints in simulations.

read the letter

The main thing here is the derivation of Cramér-Rao bounds that fold in one-bit quantization effects for MIMO ISAC, done separately for point-like and extended targets, along with estimators that approach those bounds and an ADMM framework using majorization-minimization to optimize the transmit waveform under a symbol error probability constraint and total power limit. The simulations back that the bounds are tight and the method beats the benchmarks while allowing a tunable trade-off between sensing and communication metrics. These CRBs are presented as new rather than direct reductions of prior unquantized work, which is the clearest advance. The optimization step is handled practically given the nonlinearity introduced by the quantization model. The approach stays within standard estimation theory and convex-relaxation techniques, with no sign of circular fitting or invented parameters beyond the usual trade-off weight. A soft spot is that the quantization distortion model is taken as given; if real hardware deviates from it, the reported gains may shrink, though the paper's claims are limited to the model and the simulations stay consistent inside it. No load-bearing gaps or contradictions show up in the provided material. This paper is for people working on hardware-constrained ISAC, especially low-cost MIMO setups aimed at 6G or radar-communication overlap. A reader who needs quantization-aware performance limits or a workable solver for the resulting nonconvex problem will get concrete value. It has enough formal grounding and reproducible simulation evidence to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk reject. I would send it for peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives two novel Cramér-Rao bounds (CRBs) for parameter estimation of point-like and extended targets in MIMO ISAC systems that employ one-bit ADCs. It develops associated estimators that approach these bounds and formulates a bi-criterion waveform optimization problem that minimizes the CRBs subject to a symbol error probability (SEP) constraint and a total power constraint. An ADMM framework incorporating the majorization-minimization technique is proposed to obtain high-quality suboptimal solutions to the resulting non-convex problem. Simulations are used to verify CRB tightness and to demonstrate performance gains over benchmark schemes.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies quantization-aware theoretical bounds and practical optimization tools for low-cost, power-efficient MIMO ISAC systems. The grounding in standard estimation theory together with the use of established convex-relaxation and alternating-optimization techniques (ADMM+MM) provides a solid foundation; the reported simulation evidence of CRB tightness and flexible CRB–SEP trade-offs adds concrete value for hardware-constrained ISAC design.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states that simulations confirm CRB tightness but does not report the number of Monte-Carlo trials or any error-bar analysis; adding this information would strengthen the empirical validation of the derived bounds.
Notation for the one-bit quantization model (e.g., the definition of the effective noise or the likelihood function) should be introduced once in a dedicated subsection and then used consistently in both the PT and ET CRB derivations to improve readability.
The trade-off weight between the CRB objective and the SEP constraint is listed as a free parameter; a brief sensitivity study or recommended range would help readers reproduce the reported performance curves.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives two novel CRBs for point-like and extended targets by adapting standard Cramér-Rao bound theory to incorporate one-bit quantization effects, then develops associated estimators and applies an ADMM+MM solver to the resulting non-convex waveform optimization under SEP and power constraints. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the quantization model and optimization framework rest on first-principles derivations from estimation theory and convex relaxation rather than renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. Simulations verify tightness but do not alter the independent mathematical content of the claims. This is the expected non-circular outcome for work grounded in established frameworks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard CRB assumptions (unbiased estimators, known noise statistics) and typical ISAC channel models; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the optimization trade-off weight, which is chosen by the designer.

free parameters (1)

trade-off weight between CRB and SEP
User-selected scalar that controls the bi-criterion balance in the ADMM formulation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard regularity conditions for CRB validity hold under one-bit quantization
Invoked when deriving the quantized Fisher information matrix for both PT and ET cases.
domain assumption The majorization-minimization surrogate is tight enough for ADMM convergence to a stationary point
Used to handle the nonconvex CRB objective.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1362 out tokens · 48587 ms · 2026-05-10T16:59:43.791956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references

[1]

CRB oriented transmit waveform optimization for one-bit MIMO radar,

Q. Lin, H. Shen, W. Xu, and C. Zhao, “CRB oriented transmit waveform optimization for one-bit MIMO radar,” inProc. IEEE 101st V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2025-Spring), Oslo, Norway, Jun. 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[2]

Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state- of-the-art, and the road ahead,

F. Liuet al., “Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state- of-the-art, and the road ahead,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3834–3862, Jun. 2020

2020
[3]

An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

J. A. Zhanget al., “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, Nov. 2021

2021
[4]

A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,

A. Liuet al., “A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 994– 1034, 2nd Quart., 2022

2022
[5]

Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

F. Liuet al., “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual- functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Jun. 2022. [6]Framework Overall Objectives Future Develop. IMT for 2030 Beyond, ITU-R Standard M.2160-0, Nov. 2023

2022
[6]

Joint radar-communication transmission: A generalized Pareto optimization framework,

L. Chen, F. Liu, W. Wang, and C. Masouros, “Joint radar-communication transmission: A generalized Pareto optimization framework,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 2752–2765, 2021

2021
[7]

Transmit design for joint MIMO radar and multiuser communications with transmit covariance constraint,

X. Liu, T. Huang, and Y . Liu, “Transmit design for joint MIMO radar and multiuser communications with transmit covariance constraint,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1932–1950, Jun. 2022

1932
[8]

Dual-functional radar-communication waveform design: A symbol-level precoding approach,

R. Liuet al., “Dual-functional radar-communication waveform design: A symbol-level precoding approach,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1316–1331, Nov. 2021

2021
[9]

Cram ´er-Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,

F. Liu, Y . -F. Liu, A. Li, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar, “Cram ´er-Rao bound optimization for joint radar-communication beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 240–253, 2022

2022
[10]

MIMO integrated sensing and commu- nication: CRB-rate tradeoff,

H. Hua, T. X. Han, and J. Xu, “MIMO integrated sensing and commu- nication: CRB-rate tradeoff,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2839–2854, Apr. 2024

2024
[11]

MIMO integrated sensing and communication exploiting prior information,

C. Xu and S. Zhang, “MIMO integrated sensing and communication exploiting prior information,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2306–2321, Sep. 2024

2024
[12]

Joint transmit waveform and receive filter design for dual-function radar-communication systems,

C. G. Tsinoset al., “Joint transmit waveform and receive filter design for dual-function radar-communication systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1378–1392, Nov. 2021

2021
[13]

Generalized transceiver beamforming for DFRC with MIMO radar and MU-MIMO communication,

L. Chenet al., “Generalized transceiver beamforming for DFRC with MIMO radar and MU-MIMO communication,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1795–1808, Jun. 2022

2022
[14]

Quantized precoding for massive MU-MIMO,

S. Jacobssonet al., “Quantized precoding for massive MU-MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4670–4684, Nov. 2017

2017
[15]

A framework for one-bit and constant-envelope precoding over multiuser massive MISO channels,

M. Shao, Q. Li, W. -K. Ma, and A. M. -C. So, “A framework for one-bit and constant-envelope precoding over multiuser massive MISO channels,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 20, pp. 5309–5324, Oct. 2019

2019
[16]

Joint symbol level precoding and receive beamforming optimization for multiuser MIMO downlink,

S. Cai, H. Zhu, C. Shen, and T. -H. Chang, “Joint symbol level precoding and receive beamforming optimization for multiuser MIMO downlink,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 6185–6199, 2022

2022
[17]

Channel estimation and performance analysis of one-bit massive MIMO systems,

Y . Liet al., “Channel estimation and performance analysis of one-bit massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 15, pp. 4075–4089, Aug. 2017

2017
[18]

Binary MIMO detection via homotopy optimization and its deep adaptation,

M. Shao and W. -K. Ma, “Binary MIMO detection via homotopy optimization and its deep adaptation,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 781–796, 2021

2021
[19]

Transmit sequence design for dual-function radar-communication system with one-bit DACs,

Z. Cheng, S. Shi, Z. He, and B. Liao, “Transmit sequence design for dual-function radar-communication system with one-bit DACs,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 5846–5860, Sep. 2021

2021
[20]

A precoding approach for dual-functional radar- communication system with one-bit DACs,

X. Yuet al., “A precoding approach for dual-functional radar- communication system with one-bit DACs,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Com- mun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1965–1977, Jun. 2022

1965
[21]

One-bit transceiver optimization for mmWave integrated sensing and communication sys- tems,

Q. Lin, H. Shen, Z. Li, W. Xu, C. Zhao, and X. You, “One-bit transceiver optimization for mmWave integrated sensing and communication sys- tems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 800–816, Feb. 2025

2025
[22]

Improved CRB for millimeter-wave radar with 1-bit ADCs,

K. U. Mazher, A. Mezghani, and R. W. Heath, “Improved CRB for millimeter-wave radar with 1-bit ADCs,”IEEE Open J. Signal Process., vol. 2, pp. 318–335, May 2021

2021
[23]

Symbol-level precoding through the lens of zero forcing and vector perturbation,

Y . Liu, M. Shao, W. -K. Ma, and Q. Li, “Symbol-level precoding through the lens of zero forcing and vector perturbation,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 1687–1703, 2022

2022
[24]

The Bussgang decomposition of nonlin- ear systems: Basic theory and MIMO extensions [lecture notes],

¨O. T. Demir and E. Bj ¨ornson, “The Bussgang decomposition of nonlin- ear systems: Basic theory and MIMO extensions [lecture notes],”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 131–136, Jan. 2021

2021
[25]

Capacity lower bound of MIMO channels with output quantization and correlated noise,

A. Mezghani and J. A. Nossek, “Capacity lower bound of MIMO channels with output quantization and correlated noise,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), Boston, MA, USA, Jul. 2012, pp. 1–5

2012
[26]

M. A. Richards,Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 2014

2014
[27]

S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-hall, 1993

1993
[28]

The Gaussian data assumption leads to the largest Cram´er-Rao bound [Lecture Notes],

P. Stoica and P. Babu, “The Gaussian data assumption leads to the largest Cram´er-Rao bound [Lecture Notes],”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 132–133, May 2011

2011
[29]

One-bit MUSIC,

X. Huang and B. Liao, “One-bit MUSIC,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 961–965, Jul. 2019

2019
[30]

On optimal MMSE channel estimation for one-bit quantized MIMO systems,

M. Ding, I. Atzeni, A. T ¨olli, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “On optimal MMSE channel estimation for one-bit quantized MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 73, pp. 617–632, 2025

2025
[31]

Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers,

S. Boydet al., “Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers,”F ound. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–122, 2011

2011
[32]

Alternating direction method of mul- tipliers for separable convex optimization of real functions in complex variables,

L. Li, X. Wang, and G. Wang, “Alternating direction method of mul- tipliers for separable convex optimization of real functions in complex variables,”Math. Problems Eng., vol. 2015, Art. no. 104531

2015
[33]

Majorization-minimization algo- rithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,

Y . Sun, P. Babu, and D. P. Palomar, “Majorization-minimization algo- rithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 794–816, Feb. 2017

2017
[34]

Boyd and L

S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex Optimization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004

2004
[35]

A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,

Y . -F. Liuet al., “A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2992–3031, Nov. 2024

2024
[36]

Nocedal and S

J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization.New York, NY , USA: Springer, 2006

2006
[37]

Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the ex- ponential correlation matrix,

S. L. Loyka, “Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the ex- ponential correlation matrix,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 369–371, Sep. 2001

2001
[38]

Range compression and waveform optimization for MIMO radar: A Cram ´er- Rao bound based study,

J. Li, L. Xu, P. Stoica, K. W. Forsythe, and D. W. Bliss, “Range compression and waveform optimization for MIMO radar: A Cram ´er- Rao bound based study,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 218–232, Jan. 2008

2008
[39]

Grant and S

M. Grant and S. Boyd. (2014).CVX: MATLAB Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, V ersion 2.1.[Online]. Available: http://cvxr.com/cvx/

2014
[40]

Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars,

I. Bekkerman and J. Tabrikian, “Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3873–3883, Oct. 2006

2006