pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08051 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Flux variability of the "10 keV feature" of 4U 0115+63

Katrin Berger , Ekaterina Sokolova-Lapa , Ralf Ballhausen , Aafia Zainab , Philipp Thalhammer , Nicolas Zalot , Katja Pottschmidt , Carlo Ferrigno
show 9 more authors
Richard E. Rothschild Felix Fuerst Peter Kretschmar Joel B. Coley Pragati Pradhan Brent F. West Peter A. Becker Alicia Rouco-Escorial Joern Wilms
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray pulsarscyclotron resonant scattering features10 keV featureaccretion-powered pulsarsNuSTAR4U 0115+63flux variabilityquasiperiodic oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 10 keV feature in 4U 0115+63 varies independently of the continuum and cyclotron lines as flux changes during QPOs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

X-ray spectra of the pulsar 4U 0115+63 contain a distinct 10 keV emission feature alongside the usual power-law continuum and multiple cyclotron resonant scattering features. Using two NuSTAR pointings from the 2015 outburst, the authors divide the data into high and low flux states separated by the source's 500-second quasiperiodic oscillations. In each observation the relative strength of the 10 keV component falls as the underlying continuum brightens, while the component's centroid energy stays fixed. The cyclotron lines, by contrast, show no comparable change in shape or strength across the same flux steps. This pattern indicates that the 10 keV feature arises through a process separate from both the broadband continuum and the cyclotron scattering yet still within the same accretion flow.

Core claim

Flux-resolved spectroscopy shows that the 10 keV feature exhibits an anticorrelation between its flux relative to the continuum and the continuum flux level itself, while its centroid energy remains constant within a given observation. No analogous flux-dependent deviation appears at the energies of the harmonic cyclotron resonant scattering features. These observations strengthen earlier indications that the 10 keV feature is formed by a mechanism distinct from the continuum emission, even though both components originate in the same physical environment near the neutron star.

What carries the argument

The ratio of the flux in an added Gaussian 10 keV emission component to the flux of the cutoff power-law continuum, extracted from spectra binned by count rate during the ~500 s QPOs.

If this is right

  • The 10 keV feature cannot be dismissed as an artifact of continuum modeling or as a simple blend with the cyclotron harmonics.
  • Its formation must respond to changes in local accretion conditions on the 500 s timescale without altering the cyclotron line energies or depths.
  • Spectral models of accreting pulsars should retain the 10 keV component as an independent term rather than absorbing it into the continuum parameters.
  • Quasiperiodic flux swings offer a practical way to separate spectral components without assuming that global parameters remain fixed across an entire observation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anticorrelation persists across multiple outbursts, it could constrain the radial or vertical location where the 10 keV photons are produced relative to the cyclotron scattering region.
  • Similar flux-resolved tests on other sources that display a 10 keV feature would show whether the independence is generic or specific to 4U 0115+63.
  • The constancy of the feature's energy while its strength changes argues against explanations that tie it directly to a fixed cyclotron energy or to a simple temperature shift in the emitting plasma.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen spectral model isolates the 10 keV feature without leaving residual curvature from the continuum or cyclotron lines that could mimic the observed changes in flux ratio.

What would settle it

Re-fitting the same flux-binned spectra with a different continuum shape or without an explicit 10 keV Gaussian component removes the apparent anticorrelation between the 8-12 keV excess and overall flux.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08051 by Aafia Zainab, Alicia Rouco-Escorial, Brent F. West, Carlo Ferrigno, Ekaterina Sokolova-Lapa, Felix Fuerst, Joel B. Coley, Joern Wilms, Katja Pottschmidt, Katrin Berger, Nicolas Zalot, Peter A. Becker, Peter Kretschmar, Philipp Thalhammer, Pragati Pradhan, Ralf Ballhausen, Richard E. Rothschild.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; Barthelmy et al. (2005)) light curve of the 2015 outburst of 4U 0115+63 in the 15–50 keV band with a binning of 1 d. The blue-shaded regions highlight the quasi-simultaneous NuSTAR and Swift observation times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Light curves of N1 (top) and N2 (bot￾tom), using the combined data from FPMA and FPMB for clarity and binned at three times the spin period of 4U 0115+63. The green shaded regions highlight the observation periods of the Swift snapshots S1 and S2. 1.00 1.05 1.10 Time [MJD - 57317] 0 500 1000 1500 Rate [cts s −1 ] 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Time [s] 0 100 200 300 400 Rate [cts s −1 ] S1 N1 .. . . . . . . .… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Selected part of the 4U 0115+63 light curve, showing NuS￾TAR (red) and Swift (dark green) data highlighting the system’s strong QPOs. used in the literature. They show that a high number of differ￾ent combinations of continua and CRSF models (some with and without a “10 keV feature”) yield formally correct descriptions of the data in a statistical sense. The choice between modeling approaches must therefor… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Selected rates for extracting different flux-resolved spectra from N1 (left) and N2 (right) using 1 s binning. The selection criteria were chosen to be < 700 cts/s, 700–800 cts/, 800–900 cts/s, and > 900 cts/s for N1 and < 500 cts/s, 500–600 cts/s, 600–700 cts/s, and > 700 cts/s for N2. continuum is heavily modified by cyclotron lines. We describe the lines as multiplicative absorption lines with Gaussian … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: NuSTAR and Swift spectra of O1 (left) and O2 (right) with the best-fit model (black). The data from XRT are shown in green, FPMA in the lighter color, and FPMB in the darker color. Middle: Visualization of different model components. The data are shown in gray, and the model using the best-fit parameters is shown in black. The component contribution is shown in orange, using a dash-dotted line for the… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Residuals of the N2 flux-resolved spectra (FPMA in gray; FPMB in varying colors). The dashed orange lines mark the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Selected best-fit parameters of the flux-resolved spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Confidence contours of ratios between fundamental CRSF parameters, “10 keV feature”, and continuum flux correlations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: Modeled photon flux in two polarization modes. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

X-ray spectra of accretion-powered X-ray pulsars can often be described using a power-law continuum with a high-energy cutoff, which might be further modified by additional spectral components. The Be X-ray binary system 4U 0115+63 is well known for having one of the highest numbers of detected harmonics of its cyclotron resonant scattering features (CRSFs), a pronounced spectral component known as the ''10 keV feature,'' and quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) with a period of about 500 s during outbursts. The changes in count rate by a factor of two during the approximately 500 s QPOs allow us to probe the variation in the spectral components with flux. We study the ''10 keV feature'' in emission, aiming to disentangle it from the broadband continuum and CRSFs and investigate its origin. We focus on the flux-dependent behavior of the CRSF and its harmonics, and particularly the contribution of the ''10 keV feature,'' as seen in the flux-resolved analysis of two NuSTAR observations of the 2015 outburst. Comparing the flux-resolved spectra of a given observation with the respective total dataset revealed a distinct change in overall spectral shape at the position of the ''10 keV feature'' but no comparable deviation at the energies of the harmonic CRSFs. The change associated with the ''10 keV feature'' does not seem to involve its centroid energy, which remains constant within a given observation. We find indications for an anticorrelation between the continuum flux and the ratio of the ''10 keV feature'' flux to the continuum flux within each observation. The analysis strengthens previous claims that the ''10 keV feature'' shows some independence from the remaining features. This result supports the interpretation that the ''10 keV feature'' has a different formation mechanism than the continuum emission, although its origin lies within the same physical environment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes two NuSTAR observations of the 2015 outburst of the Be/X-ray binary 4U 0115+63, exploiting count-rate variations by a factor of ~2 during ~500 s QPOs to perform flux-resolved spectroscopy. It reports a distinct change in spectral shape at the position of the '10 keV feature' (modeled as a separate component) when comparing flux-binned spectra to the time-averaged spectrum, with no analogous change at the energies of the CRSFs and their harmonics. The analysis finds indications of an anticorrelation between the continuum flux and the ratio of the 10 keV feature flux to the continuum flux within each observation, while the feature's centroid energy remains constant. This is interpreted as evidence that the 10 keV feature has a different formation mechanism from the continuum and CRSFs, although it originates in the same physical environment.

Significance. If the reported anticorrelation is robust, the work strengthens prior suggestions of independence for the 10 keV feature and supplies a concrete, observationally testable distinction between its behavior and that of the CRSFs. The direct use of flux segments from public NuSTAR data, without reliance on fitted parameters that could introduce circularity, is a methodological strength that makes the result falsifiable and potentially reproducible by other groups.

major comments (2)
  1. [Flux-resolved spectral analysis] The central claim that the 10 keV feature exhibits flux-independent behavior (distinct from the continuum and CRSFs) rests on the assumption that the adopted spectral model (power-law plus high-energy cutoff, CRSFs, and isolated 10 keV component) fully accounts for the broadband shape. The manuscript provides no quantitative fit statistics, residual plots, or alternative-model comparisons for the flux-resolved bins, leaving open the possibility that unmodeled continuum curvature or flux-dependent absorption produces the reported shape change at 10 keV.
  2. [Results and interpretation] The anticorrelation between continuum flux and the 10 keV feature-to-continuum flux ratio is described only as 'indications' without reported correlation coefficients, uncertainties, or Monte Carlo tests of parameter covariances. This weakens the load-bearing contrast drawn with the CRSFs, for which no equivalent flux-ratio variations are quantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and title consistently place '10 keV feature' in quotes; the main text should adopt the same notation for clarity when referring to the modeled component.
  2. [Introduction] The description of the QPO period as 'about 500 s' could be made more precise by citing the exact value or range used to define the flux segments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. Their comments highlight important aspects of the analysis that we will address to improve clarity and robustness. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Flux-resolved spectral analysis] The central claim that the 10 keV feature exhibits flux-independent behavior (distinct from the continuum and CRSFs) rests on the assumption that the adopted spectral model (power-law plus high-energy cutoff, CRSFs, and isolated 10 keV component) fully accounts for the broadband shape. The manuscript provides no quantitative fit statistics, residual plots, or alternative-model comparisons for the flux-resolved bins, leaving open the possibility that unmodeled continuum curvature or flux-dependent absorption produces the reported shape change at 10 keV.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative fit statistics and residual plots for the individual flux bins would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a table listing the reduced chi-squared and degrees of freedom for each flux-resolved spectrum, together with residual plots (data-to-model ratios) in an appendix. The model itself was selected because it provides an acceptable description of the time-averaged spectrum, which is consistent with the extensive prior literature on 4U 0115+63; we will add a short paragraph explaining why flux-dependent absorption is disfavored by the absence of corresponding changes at the CRSF energies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and interpretation] The anticorrelation between continuum flux and the 10 keV feature-to-continuum flux ratio is described only as 'indications' without reported correlation coefficients, uncertainties, or Monte Carlo tests of parameter covariances. This weakens the load-bearing contrast drawn with the CRSFs, for which no equivalent flux-ratio variations are quantified.

    Authors: We accept that the qualitative phrasing 'indications' is insufficient. In the revision we will report the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and its uncertainty for the 10 keV feature-to-continuum ratio versus continuum flux in each observation. We will also describe a Monte Carlo test in which the flux ratios are randomly reassigned to assess the probability of obtaining the observed anticorrelation by chance. For the CRSFs we will explicitly compute and report the corresponding correlation coefficients, which remain consistent with zero, thereby quantifying the contrast. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical flux-resolved spectral analysis

full rationale

The paper reports direct comparisons of flux-binned NuSTAR spectra for 4U 0115+63, identifying shape changes at the 10 keV feature and an anticorrelation between continuum flux and the feature-to-continuum flux ratio. These results follow from standard data reduction and model fitting applied to observed count-rate segments; no equation or parameter is defined in terms of the target anticorrelation, no prediction is statistically forced by a prior fit to the same data, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem. The central claim remains an empirical observation rather than a tautological renaming or self-referential derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the paper relies on standard X-ray spectral fitting assumptions (power-law continuum, Gaussian or Lorentzian CRSF profiles, additive 10 keV component) whose free parameters are not enumerated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1304 out tokens · 29660 ms · 2026-05-10T16:51:37.131404+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Meszaros, P., & Bussard, R

    Alexander, S. G., Meszaros, P., & Bussard, R. W. 1989, ApJ, 342, 928

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    2022, Xspec – An X-Ray Spec- tral Fitting Package, https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/xanadu/xspec/ manual/XspecManual.html, accessed on 2022-09-21

    Arnaud, K., Gordon, C., & Dorman, B. 2022, Xspec – An X-Ray Spec- tral Fitting Package, https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/xanadu/xspec/ manual/XspecManual.html, accessed on 2022-09-21

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    I., & Lea, S

    Arons, J., Klein, R. I., & Lea, S. M. 1987, ApJ, 312, 666

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    A., Cook, R., et al

    Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., Cook, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 109

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    & Huppenkothen, D

    Bachetti, M. & Huppenkothen, D. 2018, ApJ, 853, L21

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Becker, P. A. & Wolff, M. T. 2007, ApJ, 654, 435

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Becker, P. A. & Wolff, M. T. 2022, ApJ, 939, 67

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    2022, MSc thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Bissinger, né Kühnel, M., Kreykenbohm, I., Ferrigno, C., et al

    Berger, K. 2022, MSc thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Bissinger, né Kühnel, M., Kreykenbohm, I., Ferrigno, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A99

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    N., Hill, J

    Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 165

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    A., Rothschild, R

    Coburn, W., Heindl, W. A., Rothschild, R. E., et al. 2002, ApJ, 580, 394

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    W., Li, F., Mayer, W., & Rappaport, S

    Cominsky, L., Clark, G. W., Li, F., Mayer, W., & Rappaport, S. 1978, Nature, 273, 367

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al

    Diez, C. M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A19

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Z., Wang, W., Zhang, P., et al

    Ding, Y . Z., Wang, W., Zhang, P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 6045

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    R., Jaisawal, G

    Dugair, M. R., Jaisawal, G. K., Naik, S., & Jaaffrey, S. N. A. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2458

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Farinelli, R., Ferrigno, C., Bozzo, E., & Becker, P. A. 2016, A&A, 591, A29

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    A., Segreto, A., Mineo, T., & Santangelo, A

    Ferrigno, C., Becker, P. A., Segreto, A., Mineo, T., & Santangelo, A. 2009, A&A, 498, 825

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    2020, A&A, 642, A73 Fürst, F., Kreykenbohm, I., Pottschmidt, K., et al

    Ferrigno, C., Bozzo, E., & Romano, P. 2020, A&A, 642, A73 Fürst, F., Kreykenbohm, I., Pottschmidt, K., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A37 Fürst, F., Pottschmidt, K., Wilms, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 133 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    & Swift Team

    Gehrels, N. & Swift Team. 2004, New A Rev., 48, 431

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    1972, ApJ, 178, 281

    Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., et al. 1972, ApJ, 178, 281

    work page 1972

  22. [22]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    A., Coburn, W., Gruber, D

    Heindl, W. A., Coburn, W., Gruber, D. E., et al. 2000, BAAS, 32, 1230

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    A., Coburn, W., Gruber, D

    Heindl, W. A., Coburn, W., Gruber, D. E., et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, L49

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    Houck, J. C. & Denicola, L. A. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con- ference Series, V ol. 216, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, ed. N. Manset, C. Veillet, & D. Crabtree, 591

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    C., Bhattacharya, D., & Seetha, S

    Iyer, N., Mukherjee, D., Dewangan, G. C., Bhattacharya, D., & Seetha, S. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 741

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    2025, Adv

    Jain, C., Sharma, P., & Dutta, A. 2025, Adv. Space Res., 75, 1490

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Kortright, J. B. & Thompson, A. C. 2000, X-Ray Data Booklet – Section 1.2 X- ray emission energies, https://xdb.lbl.gov/Section1/Sec_1-2.html, accessed on 2021-06-16

    work page 2000

  29. [29]

    1976, ApJ, 208, 177

    Lampton, M., Margon, B., & Bowyer, S. 1976, ApJ, 208, 177

    work page 1976

  30. [30]

    2012, MNRAS, 423, 2854

    Li, J., Wang, W., & Zhao, Y . 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2854

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    P., Becker, P

    Li, P. P., Becker, P. A., & Tao, L. 2024, A&A, 689, A316

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    P., Tao, L., Ma, R

    Li, P. P., Tao, L., Ma, R. C., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A124

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    2020, ApJ, 900, 41

    Liu, B.-S., Tao, L., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 41

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    D., & Trümper, J

    Loudas, N., Kylafis, N. D., & Trümper, J. 2024, A&A, 685, A95

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    K., Beardmore, A., & Page, K

    Madsen, K. K., Beardmore, A., & Page, K. 2020, X-calibration of NuSTAR and Swift,url: https://iachec.org/wp-content/presentations/2020/ Xcal_swift_nustar.pdf

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    K., Burwitz, V ., Forster, K., et al

    Madsen, K. K., Burwitz, V ., Forster, K., et al. 2021, arXiv:2111.01613

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 1

    Manikantan, H., Paul, B., & Rana, V . 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 530

    Manikantan, H., Paul, B., Sharma, R., Pradhan, P., & Rana, V . 2024, MNRAS, 531, 530

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Martin, R. G. & Charles, P. A. 2024, MNRAS, 528, L59

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    G., Nixon, C., Armitage, P

    Martin, R. G., Nixon, C., Armitage, P. J., Lubow, S. H., & Price, D. J. 2014, ApJ, 790, L34 Mészáros, P. 1992, High-energy radiation from magnetized neutron stars. (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Miller, G., Wasserman, I., & Salpeter, E. E. 1989, ApJ, 346, 405

    work page 1989

  42. [42]

    1991, ApJ, 383, 784 Müller, S., Ferrigno, C., Kühnel, M., et al

    Miyamoto, S., Kimura, K., Kitamoto, S., Dotani, T., & Ebisawa, K. 1991, ApJ, 383, 784 Müller, S., Ferrigno, C., Kühnel, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A6

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    & Ventura, J

    Nagel, W. & Ventura, J. 1983, A&A, 118, 66

    work page 1983

  44. [44]

    2006, ApJ, 646, 1125

    Nakajima, M., Mihara, T., Makishima, K., & Niko, H. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1125

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    & Okazaki, A

    Negueruela, I. & Okazaki, A. T. 2001, A&A, 369, 108

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    W., Salpeter, E

    Nelson, R. W., Salpeter, E. E., & Wasserman, I. 1993, ApJ, 418, 874

    work page 1993

  47. [47]

    W., Wang, J

    Nelson, R. W., Wang, J. C. L., Salpeter, E. E., & Wasserman, I. 1995, ApJ, 438, L99

    work page 1995

  48. [48]

    T., Hayasaki, K., & Moritani, Y

    Okazaki, A. T., Hayasaki, K., & Moritani, Y . 2013, PASJ, 65, 41

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    2005, ApJ, 634, L97

    Pottschmidt, K., Kreykenbohm, I., Wilms, J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, L97

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    W., Cominsky, L., Joss, P

    Rappaport, S., Clark, G. W., Cominsky, L., Joss, P. C., & Li, F. 1978, ApJ, 224, L1 Rouco Escorial, A., Bak Nielsen, A. S., Wijnands, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1802

    work page 1978

  51. [51]

    C., Iyer, N

    Roy, J., Agrawal, P. C., Iyer, N. K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 33

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    2024, A&A, 690, A50

    Roy, K., Manikantan, H., & Paul, B. 2024, A&A, 690, A50

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    1999, ApJ, 523, L85 Schönherr, G., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., et al

    Santangelo, A., Segreto, A., Giarrusso, S., et al. 1999, ApJ, 523, L85 Schönherr, G., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, 353

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    W., Schönherr, G., Falkner, S., et al

    Schwarm, F. W., Schönherr, G., Falkner, S., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A3

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    2023, PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- Nürnberg

    Sokolova-Lapa, E. 2023, PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- Nürnberg

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    2023, A&A, 674, L2

    Sokolova-Lapa, E., Stierhof, J., Dauser, T., & Wilms, J. 2023, A&A, 674, L2

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    2019, A&A, 622, A61

    Staubert, R., Trümper, J., Kendziorra, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A61

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Stierhof, J. J. R., Sokolova-Lapa, E., Berger, K., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A308

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    2021, A&A, 656, A105

    Thalhammer, P., Bissinger, M., Ballhausen, R., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A105

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    2020, The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, Technical Handbook, Version 17.0, https://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/proposals/tech_appd/ swiftta_v17.pdf, accessed on 2023-08-17

    Troja, E. 2020, The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, Technical Handbook, Version 17.0, https://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/proposals/tech_appd/ swiftta_v17.pdf, accessed on 2023-08-17

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    S., Lutovinov, A

    Tsygankov, S. S., Lutovinov, A. A., Doroshenko, V ., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A16

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    J., Roche, P., Negueruela, I., et al

    Unger, S. J., Roche, P., Negueruela, I., et al. 1998, A&A, 336, 960

    work page 1998

  63. [63]

    A., Ferland, G

    Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G. 1996, ApJ, 465, 487

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    2017, A&A, 601, A126

    Vybornov, V ., Klochkov, D., Gornostaev, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A126

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    F., Becker, P

    West, B. F., Becker, P. A., & Vasilopoulos, G. 2024, ApJ, 966, L5

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    & Degenaar, N

    Wijnands, R. & Degenaar, N. 2016, MNRAS, 463, L46

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    10 keV feature

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914 Article number, page 12 of 15 Katrin Berger et al.: Flux variability of the “10 keV feature” of 4U 0115+63 Appendix A: Additional figures (N1) In the main body of the paper we showed the results from the flux-resolved analysis of N2, see Fig. 7. The residuals of the analysis of observation N1 are show...

    work page 2000