High-efficiency graphene-silicon slot-waveguide microring modulator at 1.5 {μ}m and 2 {μ}m wavelength bands
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:14 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Integrating partially overlapped double-layer graphene onto a compact silicon slot-waveguide microring resonator produces an electro-optic modulator with 220 V-μm phase efficiency and over 70 GHz bandwidth in a 10-μm active length.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central claim is that embedding a partially overlapped double-layer graphene structure on a silicon slot-waveguide microring resonator yields an electro-optic modulator that simultaneously achieves high phase modulation efficiency of VπL = 220 V μm and bandwidth above 70 GHz at 1550 nm in a compact 10 μm active length, while also operating at the 2 μm band with over 20 GHz bandwidth and supporting 50 Gbit/s and 20 Gbit/s data rates respectively under low-voltage drive.
What carries the argument
The partially overlapped double-layer graphene placed on the silicon slot waveguide inside the microring resonator, which strengthens the electro-optic interaction by concentrating the optical field in the slot region.
If this is right
- The modulator delivers an optical modulation amplitude of -1.97 dBm with a 3 V voltage swing at 1550 nm.
- It supports 50 Gbit/s data transmission with open eye diagrams using only a 2 V peak-to-peak RF drive.
- The device maintains functionality at 2 μm wavelengths with over 20 GHz bandwidth and 20 Gbit/s operation under 2 V drive.
- The small 10 μm footprint lowers device capacitance while preserving high modulation efficiency.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The slot-waveguide plus graphene overlap geometry could be scaled to sub-10 μm rings for still higher integration density in photonic circuits.
- The same overlap approach might be tested with other two-dimensional materials or at additional wavelength bands to improve energy efficiency further.
- Direct incorporation into silicon photonic platforms could reduce power use in large-scale optical interconnects and neural network accelerators.
Load-bearing premise
The reported efficiency and bandwidth depend on the partial graphene overlap being realized without significant unaccounted optical losses or fabrication variations that would change the measured VπL and eye diagrams.
What would settle it
A repeated measurement of the phase shift per applied volt that yields a VπL value well above 220 V μm, or an electrical 3 dB bandwidth clearly below 70 GHz at 1550 nm under identical bias and drive conditions, would disprove the central performance result.
Figures
read the original abstract
Electro-optic (E/O) modulators are crucial for optical communication but face a trade-off between modulation bandwidth and efficiency. A small footprint could reduce the capacitance and increase the bandwidth, however, this usually results in a low modulation efficiency. Here, we present an integrated E/O modulator that simultaneously achieves wideband large bandwidth and high modu- lation efficiency operation by embedding a partially overlapped double-layer graphene on a compact silicon slot waveguide microring resonator. At 1550 nm, the graphene-silicon slot-waveguide demon- strates a high phase modulation efficiency of V{\pi} L = 220 V {\mu}m, and the corresponding microring modulator has a large bandwidth of over 70 GHz, a compact active length of 10 {\mu}m, and an optical modulation amplitude (OMA) of -1.97 dBm under a 3-V voltage swing. The modulator operates at a data rate of 50 Gbit/s with an open eye diagram under a 2-V Vpp RF drive voltage. The graphene modulator operation is broadband, and we also characterize its performance at 2 {\mu}m wavelength band. At 2 {\mu}m wavelength band, the microring modulator has a large bandwidth of over 20 GHz, an OMA of -3.36 dBm under a 6-V voltage swing, and an open eye diagram at 20 Gbit/s with a 2-V Vpp RF drive voltage. The difference in performance is caused by the bandwidth limit of the 2 {\mu}m wavelength band measurement setup. The broadband, large bandwidth, compact, highly effi- cient, and energy efficient graphene E/O modulator has the potential to enable large-scale graphene photonic integrated circuits, facilitating a broad range of applications such as optical interconnects, optical neural networks, and programmable photonic circuits.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports an integrated electro-optic modulator fabricated by embedding partially overlapped double-layer graphene on a compact silicon slot-waveguide microring resonator. It claims a phase modulation efficiency of VπL = 220 V·μm at 1550 nm, electro-optic bandwidth >70 GHz, active length of 10 μm, OMA of -1.97 dBm under 3 V swing, and open eye diagrams at 50 Gbit/s with 2 V Vpp drive; analogous but lower-performance results (bandwidth >20 GHz, 20 Gbit/s) are shown at 2 μm, with the difference attributed to measurement setup limits.
Significance. If the reported metrics hold after verification of constant-loss assumptions, the result would be significant for silicon photonics: it demonstrates a compact, broadband graphene modulator that simultaneously achieves high efficiency and high speed, potentially enabling dense photonic integrated circuits for interconnects, neural networks, and programmable optics.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract / resonance-shift extraction] The headline VπL = 220 V·μm at 1550 nm is extracted from resonance shift under bias in the microring (as stated in the abstract and device characterization). No voltage-dependent loss or Q-factor data are supplied to confirm that graphene-induced absorption remains constant and does not contribute to the observed shift or degrade the ring Q; this assumption is load-bearing for the efficiency claim and must be addressed with explicit loss-vs-voltage measurements or control devices.
- [Abstract / performance metrics] The >70 GHz bandwidth and OMA values lack error bars, raw S21 traces, or statistical analysis of multiple devices. Fabrication process details (graphene transfer, slot-waveguide dimensions, contact resistance) and full measurement setups are not provided, preventing assessment of reproducibility or possible post-selection artifacts.
- [Abstract / bandwidth and eye-diagram results] The 50 Gbit/s eye diagrams at 1550 nm are shown under 2 V Vpp, yet the bandwidth claim exceeds this rate; the manuscript must clarify whether bandwidth was obtained from small-signal S21 measurements or extrapolated from eye diagrams, and quantify any setup limitations at 1.5 μm (analogous to the explicit note given for the 2 μm band).
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract contains typographical artifacts (e.g., 'modu- lation', LaTeX remnants 'V{π} L' and 'V {μ}m') that should be corrected for publication.
- [Abstract] The repeated claim of 'energy efficient' operation is not supported by any numerical energy-per-bit or capacitance values in the provided text.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below. We agree that additional clarifications and data will strengthen the paper and will revise the manuscript accordingly.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / resonance-shift extraction] The headline VπL = 220 V·μm at 1550 nm is extracted from resonance shift under bias in the microring (as stated in the abstract and device characterization). No voltage-dependent loss or Q-factor data are supplied to confirm that graphene-induced absorption remains constant and does not contribute to the observed shift or degrade the ring Q; this assumption is load-bearing for the efficiency claim and must be addressed with explicit loss-vs-voltage measurements or control devices.
Authors: We agree that confirming the resonance shift arises primarily from phase modulation (rather than voltage-dependent absorption) is important for the VπL claim. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit measurements of on-resonance transmission loss versus applied bias for the microring device, together with a brief discussion of the operating regime in which graphene absorption remains approximately constant. This will directly address the load-bearing assumption. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract / performance metrics] The >70 GHz bandwidth and OMA values lack error bars, raw S21 traces, or statistical analysis of multiple devices. Fabrication process details (graphene transfer, slot-waveguide dimensions, contact resistance) and full measurement setups are not provided, preventing assessment of reproducibility or possible post-selection artifacts.
Authors: We acknowledge that reproducibility details and statistical context are currently insufficient. In the revision we will (i) add error bars derived from repeated measurements to the bandwidth and OMA values, (ii) include representative raw S21 traces in the supplementary information, (iii) expand the methods section with graphene transfer procedure, exact slot-waveguide dimensions, measured contact resistance, and a complete description of the 1.5 μm and 2 μm measurement setups. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract / bandwidth and eye-diagram results] The 50 Gbit/s eye diagrams at 1550 nm are shown under 2 V Vpp, yet the bandwidth claim exceeds this rate; the manuscript must clarify whether bandwidth was obtained from small-signal S21 measurements or extrapolated from eye diagrams, and quantify any setup limitations at 1.5 μm (analogous to the explicit note given for the 2 μm band).
Authors: The >70 GHz bandwidth was obtained directly from small-signal S21 electro-optic measurements performed with a vector network analyzer; the 50 Gbit/s eye diagrams are separate large-signal demonstrations and were not used to extrapolate the bandwidth figure. We will explicitly state this distinction in the revised text. We will also add a short paragraph quantifying the 1.5 μm setup limitations (instrument bandwidth, cable losses, etc.), mirroring the existing note for the 2 μm band. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Pure experimental report with no derivation chain
full rationale
The paper reports measured device performance (VπL = 220 V·μm, >70 GHz bandwidth, OMA values, eye diagrams) obtained from fabricated graphene-silicon slot-waveguide microring resonators. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are present that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs. All key figures are direct experimental outputs (resonance shifts under bias, S21 bandwidth, eye diagrams), making the report self-contained against external benchmarks with no circularity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Graphene exhibits electro-optic response when integrated with silicon waveguides under standard cleanroom processing conditions.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thomson,Siliconopticalmodulators,Nat.Photon.4,518 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[2]
D. A. B. Miller, Attojoule optoelectronics for low-energy information processing and communications, J. Light- wave Technol.35, 346 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[3]
Zhanget al., Harnessing plasma absorption in silicon MOS ring modulators, Nat
W. Zhanget al., Harnessing plasma absorption in silicon MOS ring modulators, Nat. Photon.17, 273 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[4]
Bogaertset al., Programmable photonic circuits, Na- ture586, 207 (2020)
W. Bogaertset al., Programmable photonic circuits, Na- ture586, 207 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[5]
Shenet al., Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Nat
Y. Shenet al., Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Nat. Photon.11, 441 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[6]
Donget al., Reconfigurable 100 Gb/s silicon photonic network-on-chip, J
P. Donget al., Reconfigurable 100 Gb/s silicon photonic network-on-chip, J. Opt. Commun. Netw.7, 37 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[7]
C. Luan, R. Davis III, Z. Chen, D. Englund, and R. Hamerly, Single-shot matrix-matrix photonic proces- sor based on spatial-spectral hypermultiplexed parallel diffraction, Nature Communications (2026)
work page 2026
-
[8]
C. Luan, A. Sludds, C. Li, G. Lankford, R. Hamerly, and D. Englund, Demonstration and non-volatile trimming of a 64-channel parallel ring modulators, inCLEO: Appli- cations and Technology(Optica Publishing Group, 2025) p. AA125_1
work page 2025
-
[9]
C. Luan, R. Davis, Z. Chen, D. Englund, and R. Hamerly, Large-scale, high-parallelism optical tensor processor, in AI and Optical Data Sciences VII, Vol. 13906 (SPIE,
-
[10]
Y. Yuan, Y. Peng, W. V. Sorin, S. Cheung, Z. Huang, D. Liang, M. Fiorentino, and R. G. Beausoleil, A 5×200 gbpsmicroringmodulatorsiliconchipempoweredbytwo- segment z-shape junctions, Nature Communications15, 918 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[11]
Zhanget al., 240 Gb/s optical transmission based on an ultrafast silicon microring modulator, Photon
Y. Zhanget al., 240 Gb/s optical transmission based on an ultrafast silicon microring modulator, Photon. Res. 10, 1127 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[12]
M. Sakibet al., A high-speed micro-ring modulator for next generation energy-efficient optical networks beyond 100 Gbaud, inCLEO(2021) p. SF1C.3
work page 2021
-
[13]
Timurdoganet al., An ultralow power athermal silicon modulator, Nat
E. Timurdoganet al., An ultralow power athermal silicon modulator, Nat. Commun.5, 4008 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[14]
C. Wanget al., Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages, Na- ture562, 101 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[15]
M. Heet al., High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond, Nat. Photon.13, 359 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[16]
Y. Xueet al., Breaking the bandwidth limit of a high- quality-factor ring modulator based on thin-film lithium niobate, Optica9, 1131 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[17]
Thomaschewskiet al., Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switches, Nat
M. Thomaschewskiet al., Plasmonic monolithic lithium niobate directional coupler switches, Nat. Commun.11, 748 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[18]
X. Fang, F. Yang, X. Chen, Y. Li, and F. Zhang, Ultrahigh-speed optical interconnects with thin film lithium niobate modulator, J. Lightwave Technol.41, 1207 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[19]
M.Xu, M.He, H.Zhang, J.Jian, Y.Pan, X.Liu, Z.Chen, X. Meng, H. Chen, Z. Li, X. Chen, S. Yu, S. Yu, and X. Cai, High-performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform, Nat. Com- mun.11, 3911 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[20]
Renaudet al., Sub-1 volt and high-bandwidth visible to near-infrared electro-optic modulators, Nat
D. Renaudet al., Sub-1 volt and high-bandwidth visible to near-infrared electro-optic modulators, Nat. Commun. 14, 1496 (2023)
work page 2023
- [21]
-
[22]
M. Eppenbergeret al., Resonant plasmonic micro- racetrack modulators with high bandwidth and high tem- perature tolerance, Nat. Photon.17, 360 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[23]
S. Abelet al., Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanos- tructured barium titanate integrated on silicon, Nat. Mater.18, 42 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[24]
C. Haffneret al., All-plasmonic Mach–Zehnder modula- tor enabling optical high-speed communication at the mi- croscale, Nat. Photon.9, 525 (2015). 8
work page 2015
-
[25]
Haffneret al., Low-loss plasmon-assisted electro-optic modulator, Nature556, 483 (2018)
C. Haffneret al., Low-loss plasmon-assisted electro-optic modulator, Nature556, 483 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[26]
Messneret al., Plasmonic ferroelectric modulators, J
A. Messneret al., Plasmonic ferroelectric modulators, J. Lightwave Technol.37, 281 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[27]
R. Palmeret al., High-speed, low drive-voltage silicon- organichybridmodulatorbasedonabinary-chromophore electro-optic material, J. Lightwave Technol.32, 2726 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[28]
Wolfet al., Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) Mach- Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit/s on-off keying, Sci
S. Wolfet al., Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) Mach- Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit/s on-off keying, Sci. Rep.8, 2598 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[29]
I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, S. Mason, M. L. Meretska, D. L. Elder, D. Kazakov, A. Shams-Ansari, L. R. Dalton, and F. Capasso, Gigahertz free-space electro-optic modula- tors based on Mie resonances, Nat. Commun.13, 3170 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[30]
D. Moor, J. Leuthold, Y. Fedoryshyn, M. Möller, and U. Koch, Plasmonic transceivers for the terabaud age, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.30, 1 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[31]
Hanet al., Efficient low-loss InGaAsP/Si hybrid MOS optical modulator, Nat
J. Hanet al., Efficient low-loss InGaAsP/Si hybrid MOS optical modulator, Nat. Photon.11, 486 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[32]
Hirakiet al., Heterogeneously integrated III–V/Si MOS capacitor Mach–Zehnder modulator, Nat
T. Hirakiet al., Heterogeneously integrated III–V/Si MOS capacitor Mach–Zehnder modulator, Nat. Photon. 11, 482 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[33]
Y. Tanget al., Over 67 GHz bandwidth hybrid silicon electroabsorptionmodulatorwithasymmetricsegmented electrodefor1.3µmtransmission,Opt.Express20,11529 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[34]
R. Aminet al., Sub-wavelength GHz-fast broadband ITO Mach–Zehnder modulator on silicon photonics, Optica7, 333 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[35]
C. Wang, D. Fang, J. Zhang, A. Kotz, G. Lihachev, M. Churaev, Z. Li, A. Schwarzenberger, X. Ou, C. Koos, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultrabroadband thin-film lithium tantalate modulator for high-speed communications, Op- tica11, 1614 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[36]
F. Nazaret al., Heterogeneously integrated lithium tantalate-on-silicon nitride modulators for high- speed communications, Nat. Commun. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69769-3
-
[37]
J. Zhanget al., Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic frequency comb in lithium tantalate, Nature637, 1096 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[38]
C. Wanget al., Lithium tantalate photonic integrated cir- cuits for volume manufacturing, Nature629, 784 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[39]
C.T.Phareet al.,Grapheneelectro-opticmodulatorwith 30 GHz bandwidth, Nat. Photon.9, 511 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[40]
Sorianelloet al., Graphene–silicon phase modulators with gigahertz bandwidth, Nat
V. Sorianelloet al., Graphene–silicon phase modulators with gigahertz bandwidth, Nat. Photon.12, 40 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[41]
Liuet al., A graphene-based broadband optical mod- ulator, Nature474, 64 (2011)
M. Liuet al., A graphene-based broadband optical mod- ulator, Nature474, 64 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[42]
Liuet al., Double-layer graphene optical modulator, Nano Lett.12, 1482 (2012)
M. Liuet al., Double-layer graphene optical modulator, Nano Lett.12, 1482 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[43]
H. Agarwalet al., 2D-3D integration of hexagonal boron nitride and a high-κdielectric for ultrafast graphene- based electro-absorption modulators, Nat. Commun.12, 1070 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[44]
Giambraet al., High-speed double layer graphene electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide, Opt
M. Giambraet al., High-speed double layer graphene electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide, Opt. Express27, 20145 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[45]
Mohsinet al., Graphene based low insertion loss electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide, Opt
M. Mohsinet al., Graphene based low insertion loss electro-absorption modulator on SOI waveguide, Opt. Express22, 15292 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[46]
H. Daliret al., Athermal broadband graphene optical modulator with 35 GHz speed, ACS Photonics3, 1564 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[47]
B. S. Leeet al., High-performance integrated graphene electro-optic modulator at cryogenic temperature, Nanophotonics10, 99 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[48]
Bonaccorsoet al., Graphene photonics and optoelec- tronics, Nat
F. Bonaccorsoet al., Graphene photonics and optoelec- tronics, Nat. Photon.4, 611 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[49]
N. Youngbloodet al., Multifunctional graphene opti- cal modulator and photodetector integrated on silicon waveguides, Nano Lett.14, 2741 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[50]
C. Qiuet al., Efficient modulation of 1.55µm radiation with gated graphene on a silicon microring resonator, Nano Lett.14, 6811 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[51]
Y. Huet al., Broadband 10 Gb/s operation of graphene electro-absorption modulator on silicon, Laser Photon. Rev.10, 307 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[52]
Dattaet al., Low-loss composite photonic platform based on 2D semiconductor monolayers, Nat
I. Dattaet al., Low-loss composite photonic platform based on 2D semiconductor monolayers, Nat. Photon.14, 252 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[53]
Xiaet al., Two-dimensional material nanophotonics, Nat
F. Xiaet al., Two-dimensional material nanophotonics, Nat. Photon.8, 899 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[54]
M. Onoet al., Ultrafast and energy-efficient all-optical switching with graphene-loaded deep-subwavelength plasmonic waveguides, Nat. Photon.14, 37 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[55]
C. Luan, D. Kong, Y. Ding, and H. Hu, High-modulation- efficiency graphene-silicon slot-waveguide micro-ring modulator, inCLEO: Science and Innovations(Optica Publishing Group, 2022) pp. JTh6B–8
work page 2022
-
[56]
C.Luan, Y.Liu, D.Kong, Y.Ding,andH.Hu,Integrated 2-µm electro-optic modulator based on grapheme-silicon slot-waveguide microring resonator, in2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(IEEE, 2022) pp. 1–2
work page 2022
-
[57]
C. Luan, D. Kong, Y. Ding, and H. Hu, High-speed integrated graphene- silicon slot waveguide electro- absorption modulator at 1.5-µm and 2-µm wavebands, in2022 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP)(IEEE, 2022) pp. 1654–1656
work page 2022
-
[58]
C. Luan, D. Kong, Y. Ding, and H. Hu, Ultra-compact integrated graphene-silicon slot-waveguide electro-optic modulator, in2022 Asia Communications and Photon- ics Conference (ACP)(IEEE, 2022) pp. 29–32
work page 2022
-
[59]
C. Luan, Y. Liu, Y. Ding, and H. Hu, 2-um high-speed graphene electro-optic modulator based on silicon slot microring resonator, inCLEO: Science and Innovations (Optica Publishing Group, 2020) pp. JTh2F–34
work page 2020
-
[60]
V. R. Almeida, Q. Xu, C. A. Barrios, and M. Lipson, Guiding and confining light in void nanostructure, Optics letters29, 1209 (2004). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks Emily Theobald from MIT for help- ing polishing the schematic drawing, and Dr. Peixiong Shi, Dr Thomas Pedersen from DTU Nanolab for the equipment training. Author Contribution C. Luan, Y....
work page 2004
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.