pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09077 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.NI

Scrutinizing Real-life Configurations of Random Access Procedures in Cellular Networks

Joris Belder , Anup Bhattacharjee , Fernando Kuipers This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords cellular networksrandom access procedurecollision reductionnetwork configurationNS-3 simulationbase station broadcastsperformance improvement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying random access configurations across neighboring cells reduces collisions by 43% on average in cellular networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper gathers broadcast information from base stations of nine cellular operators in three countries to examine how they set parameters for the random access procedure that devices use to initiate connections. It finds that these parameters are often the same in neighboring cells and do not suit the specific deployment, leading to avoidable message collisions and connection delays. Simulations of the procedure show that using different configurations in a broad area can lower collision numbers by 43 percent on average and connection delays by 11 percent on average. This matters to a reader because the random access procedure is the first step for any device to use the network, so inefficiencies affect everyday connectivity.

Core claim

Through collection of over 112,000 broadcast data points, the authors establish that real-life random access configurations in cellular networks are frequently uniform across adjacent cells and mismatched to the environment. When these configurations are varied in NS-3 simulations of large multi-cell areas, the number of collisions drops by 43% on average (maximum 61%) and the connection delay decreases by 11% on average (maximum 42%).

What carries the argument

The broadcasted random access parameters such as root sequence index and preamble count, whose uniformity is tested via data analysis and whose effects are quantified in network simulations.

If this is right

  • Uniform configurations across neighboring cells unnecessarily increase collision probability in the random access procedure.
  • Tailoring configurations to the deployment scenario allows better radio resource management.
  • Collision reduction directly translates to lower connection setup times for user devices.
  • The improvements require no changes to device hardware or spectrum allocation, only base station settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Network management systems could automatically select diverse configurations based on cell location and expected load.
  • The observed benefits suggest potential gains from similar diversification in other contention-based access mechanisms.
  • Empirical validation in operational networks would be needed to account for factors not fully modeled in simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The NS-3 simulation model correctly captures the real-world behavior of random access messages, including interference and device responses under the measured configurations.

What would settle it

Observing actual collision counts and access delays in a multi-cell area before and after operators implement varied random access configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09077 by Anup Bhattacharjee, Fernando Kuipers, Joris Belder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Transmission of the Master and System Information Blocks. SIB2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The relative number of cells that share location, frequency, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The average median connection delay (median across UEs, average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The average number of collisions per amount of UEs on a log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The average median connection delay (median across UEs, average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Number of unique values for different IEs in SIB2 pertaining to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In cellular networks, base stations broadcast configurations that devices use for the random access procedure, which is a vital part of the connection setup. Ideally, the network should choose configurations based on the deployment scenario to optimize radio resource management. Doing so can, for example, decrease collisions of random access messages. We captured 112,806 data points of cellular broadcast information from nine network operators across three countries and analyzed how the operators configure the random access procedure. We found that configurations often do not fit the deployment scenario, and neighboring cells often use the same configuration, causing an unnecessarily high risk of collisions and, hence, delay in the connection setup. Furthermore, we simulated the random access procedure in NS-3 and found that by varying the configurations in a large area with many cells, the number of collisions can be reduced by 43% on average and up to 61%, and the connection delay can be lowered by 11% on average and up to 42%. Our findings indicate that simple adaptations in the random access configurations can greatly improve the performance of cellular networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 112,806 real-world cellular broadcast data points from nine operators across three countries, finding that random access configurations are often mismatched to deployment scenarios and that neighboring cells frequently reuse identical settings, increasing collision risk. NS-3 simulations of the random access procedure then show that varying configurations over a large multi-cell area reduces collisions by 43% on average (up to 61%) and connection delay by 11% on average (up to 42%).

Significance. If the simulation results hold under realistic loads, the work would demonstrate that straightforward configuration adjustments can yield substantial gains in collision avoidance and setup latency for cellular networks. The scale of the empirical measurement campaign provides a valuable snapshot of current operator practices that could guide radio resource management research.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5] §5 (NS-3 simulation): The paper collects PRACH configuration indices, root sequences, and related broadcast fields but does not describe how these are translated into NS-3 inputs such as UE density per cell, Poisson arrival rate, shadowing variance, or preamble detection threshold. Without this explicit mapping, the headline 43% average and 61% maximum collision reductions cannot be shown to arise from the measured configurations rather than from arbitrary choices of simulated traffic load.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported average reductions (43% collisions, 11% delay) are given without error bars, standard deviations, or confidence intervals, and no validation of the NS-3 model against real cellular traces is mentioned.
  2. [Data collection] Data collection description: additional details on measurement locations, time spans, and tools used to gather the 112,806 points would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the opportunity to strengthen the clarity of our simulation methodology. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (NS-3 simulation): The paper collects PRACH configuration indices, root sequences, and related broadcast fields but does not describe how these are translated into NS-3 inputs such as UE density per cell, Poisson arrival rate, shadowing variance, or preamble detection threshold. Without this explicit mapping, the headline 43% average and 61% maximum collision reductions cannot be shown to arise from the measured configurations rather than from arbitrary choices of simulated traffic load.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not currently provide an explicit step-by-step mapping from the collected broadcast fields to the NS-3 parameters. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection to §5 that supplies this mapping. The PRACH configuration indices are used directly to configure the number of available preambles, their repetition, and the subframe allocation within the NS-3 LTE module. Root-sequence indices determine the Zadoff-Chu root and cyclic shifts for preamble generation. UE density per cell is derived from the geographic context of each measurement location (urban, suburban, or rural) and set to representative values consistent with the observed cell sizes. The Poisson arrival rate is calibrated to produce baseline collision probabilities that align with those reported in the 3GPP literature for comparable loads; the same rate is applied across all compared configuration scenarios so that the reported reductions are attributable solely to the differences in PRACH settings. Shadowing variance is fixed at 8 dB following the 3GPP urban-macro model, and the preamble detection threshold is set according to the measured reference-signal received power values from the broadcast data. With these explicit choices documented, the simulation results will be shown to stem from the real-world configuration diversity rather than from arbitrary parameter selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results derive from external measurements and forward simulation.

full rationale

The paper collects 112k real broadcast messages, analyzes operator configurations, and then runs NS-3 simulations that vary those configurations to quantify collision and delay reductions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the reported 43%/61% collision or 11%/42% delay improvements to quantities defined by the same input data. The simulation is an independent forward model whose outputs are not forced by construction from the captured PRACH indices or root sequences. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings of known results are invoked. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract; the simulation presumably relies on standard NS-3 random access models whose internal parameters are not disclosed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1084 out tokens · 36248 ms · 2026-05-10T16:39:38.157511+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (2025) The Mobile Economy 2025

    GSMA. (2025) The Mobile Economy 2025. [On- line]. Available: https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/ connectivity-for-good/mobile-economy/

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    (2025) A Global Evaluation of Europe’s Competitiveness in 5G SA

    Ookla. (2025) A Global Evaluation of Europe’s Competitiveness in 5G SA. [Online]. Available: https://www.ookla.com/articles/ europe-5gsa-2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    M2M Massive Ac- cess in LTE: RACH Performance Evaluation in a Smart City Scenario,

    M. Polese, M. Centenaro, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “M2M Massive Ac- cess in LTE: RACH Performance Evaluation in a Smart City Scenario,” inIEEE ICC, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    r-Hint: A Message- efficient Random Access Response for mMTC in 5G Networks,

    T.-W. Huang, Y . Ren, K. C.-J. Lin, and Y .-C. Tseng, “r-Hint: A Message- efficient Random Access Response for mMTC in 5G Networks,” inIEEE PIMRC, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Alliance

    O.-R. Alliance. (2024) Open Software for the RAN. [Online]. Available: https://www.o-ran.org [6]O-RAN Near-RT RIC Architecture 5.0, O-RAN Alliance, Oct. 2023

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    3gpp.org/dynareport/23002.htm, 2024

    3GPP, “Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+) (GSM); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Network architecture (3GPP TS 23.002 version 18.0.0 Release 18),” https://www. 3gpp.org/dynareport/23002.htm, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Spectrum regional insights,

    GSMA, “Spectrum regional insights,” hhttps://www.gsma.com/ connectivity-for-good/spectrum/spectrum-regional-insights/, 2024, [Online; accessed 9-May-2024]

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation (3GPP TS 36.211),

    3GPP, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation (3GPP TS 36.211),” https://www. 3gpp.org/dynareport/36211.htm, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    ——, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; Stage 2, 3GPP TS 36.300 version 17.3.0 Release 17,” https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/36300.htm, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Ra- dio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (3GPP TS 36.331),

    ——, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Ra- dio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (3GPP TS 36.331),” https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/36331.htm, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Holma and A

    H. Holma and A. Toskala,LTE for UMTS: Evolution to LTE-Advanced: Second Edition, 2011, ch. 5, pp. 83–139

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Hamalainen, H

    S. Hamalainen, H. Sanneck, and C. Sartori,LTE Self-Organising Networks (SON): Network Management Automation for Operational Efficiency, 2012, ch. 5

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    QCSuper,

    P1Security, “QCSuper,” https://github.com/P1sec/QCSuper, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Cellmapper Map,

    Cellmapper, “Cellmapper Map,” https://www.cellmapper.net, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    OpenCellid,

    OpenCellid, “OpenCellid,” https://opencellid.org, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Bertrand and J

    P. Bertrand and J. Jiang,LTE – The UMTS Long Term Evolution. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, ch. 17, pp. 371–406

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Ahmadi,LTE-Advanced: A Practical Systems Approach to Under- standing 3GPP LTE Releases 10 and 11 Radio Access Technologies

    S. Ahmadi,LTE-Advanced: A Practical Systems Approach to Under- standing 3GPP LTE Releases 10 and 11 Radio Access Technologies. Academic Press Inc; Illustrated edition, 2013, ch. 10

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    5G; Study on Scenarios and Requirements for Next Generation Access Technologies (3GPP TR 38.913 version 17.0.0 Release 17),

    3GPP, “5G; Study on Scenarios and Requirements for Next Generation Access Technologies (3GPP TR 38.913 version 17.0.0 Release 17),” https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/38913.htm, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    NS-3: A discrete- event network simulator for Internet systems,

    G. F. Riley, T. R. Henderson, and N. S. Goff, “NS-3: A discrete- event network simulator for Internet systems,”University of Wisconsin, Technical Report, vol. ECE-TR-03-05, 2008

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    NS-3.24,

    nsnam.org, “NS-3.24,” https://www.nsnam.org/releases/ns-3-24/, 2015, [Online; accessed 24-August-2023]

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Radio Frequency (RF) system scenarios (3GPP TR 25.942 version 17.0.0 Release 17),

    3GPP, “Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Radio Frequency (RF) system scenarios (3GPP TR 25.942 version 17.0.0 Release 17),” https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/125942.htm, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    A First Look at SIM-enabled Wearables in the Wild,

    H. Kolamunna, I. Leontiadis, D. Perino, S. Seneviratne, K. Thi- lakarathna, and A. Seneviratne, “A First Look at SIM-enabled Wearables in the Wild,” inACM IMC, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Connected cars in cellular network: A measurement study,

    C. E. Andrade, S. D. Byers, V . Gopalakrishnan, E. Halepovic, D. J. Poole, L. K. Tran, and C. T. V olinsky, “Connected cars in cellular network: A measurement study,” inACM IMC, 2017

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Understanding Power Consumption of NB-IoT in the Wild: Tool and Large-scale Measurement,

    D. Yang, X. Zhang, X. Huang, L. Shen, J. Huang, X. Chang, and G. Xing, “Understanding Power Consumption of NB-IoT in the Wild: Tool and Large-scale Measurement,” inACM MobiCom, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Understanding Operational 5G: A First Measurement Study on its Coverage, Performance and Energy Consumption,

    D. Xu, A. Zhou, X. Zhang, G. Wang, X. Liu, C. An, Y . Shi, L. Liu, and H. Ma, “Understanding Operational 5G: A First Measurement Study on its Coverage, Performance and Energy Consumption,” inACM SIGCOMM, 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Performance of Cellular Networks on the Wheels,

    M. Ghoshal, I. Khan, Z. J. Kong, P. Dinh, J. Meng, Y . C. Hu, and D. Koutsonikolas, “Performance of Cellular Networks on the Wheels,” inACM IMC, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    A Measurement Study on Multi-path TCP with Multiple Cellular Carriers on High Speed Rails,

    L. Li, K. Xu, T. Li, K. Zheng, C. Peng, D. Wang, X. Wang, M. Shen, and R. Mijumbi, “A Measurement Study on Multi-path TCP with Multiple Cellular Carriers on High Speed Rails,” inACM SIGCOMM, 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Mobility Support in Cellular Networks: A Measurement Study on its Configurations and Implications,

    H. Deng, C. Peng, A. Fida, J. Meng, and Y . C. Hu, “Mobility Support in Cellular Networks: A Measurement Study on its Configurations and Implications,” inACM IMC, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    A Nationwide Study on Cellular Reliability: Measurement, Analysis, and Enhancements,

    Y . Li, H. Lin, Z. Li, Y . Liu, F. Qian, L. Gong, X. Xin, and T. Xu, “A Nationwide Study on Cellular Reliability: Measurement, Analysis, and Enhancements,” inACM SIGCOMM, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Mobilyzer: An Open Platform for Controllable Mobile Network Measurements,

    A. Nikravesh, H. Yao, S. Xu, D. Choffnes, and Z. M. Mao, “Mobilyzer: An Open Platform for Controllable Mobile Network Measurements,” in ACM MobiSys, 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Mobileinsight: Extracting and Analyzing Cellular Network Information on Smart- phones,

    Y . Li, C. Peng, Z. Yuan, J. Li, H. Deng, and T. Wang, “Mobileinsight: Extracting and Analyzing Cellular Network Information on Smart- phones,” inACM MobiCom, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Experience: A Five-year Retrospective of MobileInsight,

    Y . Li, C. Peng, Z. Zhang, Z. Tan, H. Deng, J. Zhao, Q. Li, Y . Guo, K. Ling, B. Dinget al., “Experience: A Five-year Retrospective of MobileInsight,” inACM MobiCom, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Experi- ence: An Open Platform for Experimentation with Commercial Mobile Broadband Networks,

    ¨O. Alay, A. Lutu, M. Pe ´on-Quir´os, V . Mancuso, T. Hirsch, K. Evensen, A. Hansen, S. Alfredsson, J. Karlsson, A. Brunstromet al., “Experi- ence: An Open Platform for Experimentation with Commercial Mobile Broadband Networks,” inACM MobiCom, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    SCOPE: An Open and Softwarized Prototyping Platform for NextG Systems,

    L. Bonati, S. D’Oro, S. Basagni, and T. Melodia, “SCOPE: An Open and Softwarized Prototyping Platform for NextG Systems,” inACM MobiSys, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Understanding and Diagnosing Real-world Femtocell Performance Problems,

    C. Peng, Y . Li, Z. Li, J. Zhao, and J. Xu, “Understanding and Diagnosing Real-world Femtocell Performance Problems,” inIEEE INFOCOM, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Towards Automatic Troubleshooting for User-level Performance Degradation in Cellular Services,

    X. Shi, M. Osinski, C. Qian, and J. Wang, “Towards Automatic Troubleshooting for User-level Performance Degradation in Cellular Services,” inACM MobiCom, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Expe- rience: Implications of Roaming in Europe,

    A. M. Mandalari, A. Lutu, A. Custura, A. Safari Khatouni, ¨O. Alay, M. Bagnulo, V . Bajpai, A. Brunstrom, J. Ott, M. Melliaet al., “Expe- rience: Implications of Roaming in Europe,” inACM MobiCom, 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Where Things Roam: Uncovering Cellular IoT/M2M Connectivity,

    A. Lutu, B. Jun, A. Finamore, F. E. Bustamante, and D. Perino, “Where Things Roam: Uncovering Cellular IoT/M2M Connectivity,” inACM IMC, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    A Characterization of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Mobile Network Operator Traffic,

    A. Lutu, D. Perino, M. Bagnulo, E. Frias-Martinez, and J. Khangosstar, “A Characterization of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Mobile Network Operator Traffic,” inACM IMC, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Impact of Device Performance on Mobile Internet QoE,

    M. Dasari, S. Vargas, A. Bhattacharya, A. Balasubramanian, S. R. Das, and M. Ferdman, “Impact of Device Performance on Mobile Internet QoE,” inACM IMC, 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Automating Diagnosis of Cellular Radio Access Network Problems,

    A. P. Iyer, L. E. Li, and I. Stoica, “Automating Diagnosis of Cellular Radio Access Network Problems,” inACM MobiCom, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Dependent Misconfigurations in 5G/4.5 G Radio Resource Control,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, Q. Li, Z. Liu, C. Peng, and S. Lu, “Dependent Misconfigurations in 5G/4.5 G Radio Resource Control,” inACM CoNEXT, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Measuring Instability of Mobility Management in Cellular Networks,

    X. Zhao, H. Ma, Y . Jin, and J. Yao, “Measuring Instability of Mobility Management in Cellular Networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 32, no. 5, 2018

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Instability in Distributed Mobility Management: Revisiting Configuration Management in 3G/4G Mobile Networks,

    Y . Li, H. Deng, J. Li, C. Peng, and S. Lu, “Instability in Distributed Mobility Management: Revisiting Configuration Management in 3G/4G Mobile Networks,” inACM SIGMETRICS, 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Aurora: Conformity-based Configuration Recommen- dation to Improve LTE/5G Service,

    A. Mahimkar, Z. Ge, X. Liu, Y . Shaqalle, Y . Xiang, J. Yates, S. Pathak, and R. Reichel, “Aurora: Conformity-based Configuration Recommen- dation to Improve LTE/5G Service,” inACM IMC, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Self-configuration in LTE Radio Networks: Automatic Generation of ENodeB Parameters,

    A. Eisenblatter, U. Turke, and C. Schmelz, “Self-configuration in LTE Radio Networks: Automatic Generation of ENodeB Parameters,” in IEEE VTC, 2011

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    Radio Resource Management Techniques for eMBB and mMTC Services in 5G Dense Small Cell Scenarios,

    N. H. Mahmood, M. Lauridsen, G. Berardinelli, D. Catania, and P. Mogensen, “Radio Resource Management Techniques for eMBB and mMTC Services in 5G Dense Small Cell Scenarios,” inIEEE VTC, 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Experience: Rethinking RRC State Machine Optimization in Light of Recent Advancements,

    T. Stoner, X. Wei, J. Knight, and L. Guo, “Experience: Rethinking RRC State Machine Optimization in Light of Recent Advancements,” inACM MobiCom, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Measuring and Understanding RRC State Machine Optimization in Light of Recent Advancements,

    X. Wei, T. Stoner, J. Knight, and L. Guo, “Measuring and Understanding RRC State Machine Optimization in Light of Recent Advancements,” IEEE ToMC, vol. 16, no. 5, 2016

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    iCellular: Device-Customized Cellular Network Access on Commodity Smartphones,

    Y . Li, H. Deng, C. Peng, Z. Yuan, G.-H. Tu, J. Li, and S. Lu, “iCellular: Device-Customized Cellular Network Access on Commodity Smartphones,” inUSENIX NSDI, 2016

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Performance Analysis and Optimization of Handoff Algorithms in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,

    M. Liu, Z. Li, X. Guo, and E. Dutkiewicz, “Performance Analysis and Optimization of Handoff Algorithms in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,”IEEE ToMC, vol. 7, no. 7, 2008

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Inter-system Handover Parameter Optimization,

    C. Brunner, A. Garavaglia, M. Mittal, M. Narang, and J. V . Bautista, “Inter-system Handover Parameter Optimization,” inIEEE VTC, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Coordinating Handover Parameter Optimization and Load Balancing in LTE Self- optimizing Networks,

    A. Lobinger, S. Stefanski, T. Jansen, and I. Balan, “Coordinating Handover Parameter Optimization and Load Balancing in LTE Self- optimizing Networks,” inIEEE VTC, 2011

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    Device Power Saving and Latency Optimization in LTE-A Networks through DRX Configuration,

    A. T. Koc, S. C. Jha, R. Vannithamby, and M. Torlak, “Device Power Saving and Latency Optimization in LTE-A Networks through DRX Configuration,”IEEE ToWC, vol. 13, no. 5, 2014

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Roadrunner: O-RAN-based Cell Selection in Beyond 5G Networks,

    E. Coronado, S. Siddiqui, and R. Riggio, “Roadrunner: O-RAN-based Cell Selection in Beyond 5G Networks,” inIEEE/IFIP NOMS, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (3GPP TS 36.321),

    3GPP, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (3GPP TS 36.321),” 3GPP , https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/36321.htm, 2022. APPENDIX ETHICS The 4G dongle UE we used triggers and sends a failed attach procedure to the eNodeB, but it does not generate any traffic load and neither harms the m...

    work page 2022