pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09115 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.NI · cs.RO

"Take Me Home, Wi-Fi Drone": A Drone-based Wireless System for Wilderness Search and Rescue

Weiying Hou , Luca Jiang-Tao Yu , Chenshu Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI cs.RO
keywords droneWi-Fisearch and rescuedevice discoverydirection findingLuneburg Lensautonomous navigationwilderness
0
0 comments X

The pith

A drone finds lost people in the wild by broadcasting fake Wi-Fi networks that make their phones try to reconnect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Wi2SAR as a drone system that locates victims in remote wilderness by mimicking familiar Wi-Fi networks to exploit the automatic reconnection behavior of their mobile devices. This approach allows discovery and direction finding over long ranges and through occlusions like trees, without any existing cellular, Wi-Fi, or other ground infrastructure. A sympathetic reader would care because current wilderness search methods rely on slow human teams or visual drones that struggle in dense terrain, and this wireless trigger could enable faster, autonomous operations if the reconnection reliably occurs. The system achieves this through three technical pieces: fast device scanning to identify the target, a special lens that turns signal strength into reliable direction cues, and flight controls that steer the drone toward the source. Real-world tests with various phones in actual outdoor settings back the claim that the method works practically.

Core claim

Wi2SAR is an autonomous drone-based wireless system for wilderness search and rescue that discovers and localizes victims through their mobile devices by having the drone mimic known Wi-Fi networks, thereby triggering automatic reconnection attempts. The system operates without any existing infrastructure and handles long-range, through-occlusion scenarios via three innovations: a rapid energy-efficient discovery mechanism, RSS-only long-range direction finding that uses a 3D-printed Luneburg Lens to amplify directional signal strength differences, and an adaptive drone navigation scheme that efficiently guides the drone to the target.

What carries the argument

The Wi2SAR system, which uses on-drone Wi-Fi to mimic known networks and exploit device reconnection, paired with a Luneburg Lens antenna that converts received signal strength into directional information and adaptive navigation to approach the source.

Load-bearing premise

That victims carry powered-on Wi-Fi-enabled mobile devices whose reconnection behavior to mimicked networks stays reliable amid wilderness occlusion, interference, and differences across phone models.

What would settle it

A field test in dense forest where a powered-on smartphone within claimed range fails to trigger reconnection or produce detectable directional signals when the drone broadcasts the mimicked network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09115 by Chenshu Wu, Luca Jiang-Tao Yu, Weiying Hou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of Wi2SAR System. controlled 2D indoor environments with carefully arranged and calibrated phased arrays and known anchors as refer￾ences [22, 27, 37, 54]. Unfortunately, these assumptions do not hold for WiSAR, where the drone, flying high above the ground, must perform 3D direction finding over very long distances with signals barely above the noise floor using an in-motion antenna array. • Dron… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Typical Working Scenario. to address all possible situations, Wi2SAR is designed as a best-effort solution aimed at maximizing applicability across diverse cases to save lives. Scope: Again, we are motivated by the goal of maximizing the chance of survival through timely rescue, rather than covering all WiSAR scenarios, which is practically impossible. Our current design leverages the auto-reconnection beh… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Design and Fabrication of the Luneburg Lens. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Luneburg Lens Beam Patterns. (a) COMSOL simulation, (b) measured beam, and (c) chamber setup; in (a,b), the blue–red color scale indicates signal strength. the target. We therefore use a reference beam template 𝐵0 on the lens surface, obtained once at design time (e.g., a single far-field characterization in a microwave anechoic chamber, rather than per-deployment or on-the-fly calibra￾tion). Second, the f… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Prototype of Wi2SAR. AP3 Monitor3 AP2 Monitor2 AP1* Monitor1 (*: Associated) 4 3 2 Overhearing … MAC filter Target MAC SN:4 SN:3 SN:2 SN:4 SN:3 SN:2 SN:2 4: Fast complete 3: Absence (wait longer) 2: Delayed complete SN:1 SN:1 SN:4 1 1: Timed-out with loss SN:1 Timed out Time ① Dual-mode NICs ② Packets Buffer Target device (SN=Sequence Number) MAC addr. 1 1 ③ RSS snapshots 2 2 2 4 4 4 Direction Finding Modu… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) FPC antenna layout. (b) Actual deployment. (c) Alignment with drone’s coord. (roll, pitch, yaw). solution is twofold. First, we physically decouple the lens from the drone by installing a layer of microwave-absorbing foam between the Luneburg Lens and the airframe (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Experiment scenarios. (a)–(d) Bird’s-eye views of four test environments: an on-hill playground, a forested hill, rugged terrain, and a hillside shoreline. (e) Zoom-in of the drone in operation. (f1)–(f10) typical placements for target devices. PR is signed and task-oriented. We report the MedPR (median PR) as an indicator of typical performance. • Exploratory Success Rate: Fraction of target devices succe… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a, b) RSS gain with Luneburg Lens (ground). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Performance of Direction Finding Module. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Example Drone Trajectories across Trials. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Wilderness Search and Rescue (WiSAR) represents a longstanding and critical societal challenge, demanding innovative and automatic technological solutions. In this paper, we introduce Wi2SAR, a novel autonomous drone-based wireless system for long-range, through-occlusion WiSAR operations, without relying on existing infrastructure. Our basic insight is to leverage the automatic reconnection behavior of modern Wi-Fi devices to known networks. By mimicking these networks via on-drone Wi-Fi, Wi2SAR uniquely facilitates the discovery and localization of victims through their accompanying mobile devices. Translating this simple idea into a practical system poses substantial technical challenges. Wi2SAR overcomes these challenges via three distinct innovations: (1) a rapid and energy-efficient device discovery mechanism to discover and identify the target victim, (2) a novel RSS-only, long-range direction finding approach using a 3D-printed Luneburg Lens, amplifying the directional signal strength differences and significantly extending the operational range, and (3) an adaptive drone navigation scheme that guides the drone toward the target efficiently. We implement an end-to-end prototype and evaluate Wi2SAR across various mobile devices and real-world wilderness scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate Wi2SAR's high performance, efficiency, and practicality, highlighting its potential to advance autonomous WiSAR solutions. Wi2SAR is open-sourced at https://aiot-lab.github.io/Wi2SAR to facilitate further research and real-world deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Wi2SAR, a drone-based wireless system for wilderness search and rescue that mimics known Wi-Fi networks on the drone to trigger automatic reconnection from victims' mobile devices, enabling discovery and localization. It proposes three innovations: (1) a rapid energy-efficient device discovery mechanism, (2) RSS-only long-range direction finding via a 3D-printed Luneburg Lens to amplify directional signal differences, and (3) an adaptive navigation scheme. An end-to-end prototype is implemented and evaluated across mobile devices and real-world wilderness scenarios, with claims of high performance, efficiency, and practicality; the system is open-sourced.

Significance. If the results hold, the work offers a practical infrastructure-free approach to a high-stakes societal problem, potentially extending operational range and enabling through-occlusion detection. Strengths include the use of standard Wi-Fi behaviors without self-referential parameter fitting, the open-source release, and the end-to-end prototype that combines discovery, direction finding, and navigation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Evaluation] Abstract and Evaluation section: The abstract asserts 'high performance' from real-world experiments across devices and scenarios but provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, reconnection success rates, localization accuracy, or exclusion criteria. The full manuscript must include these data (e.g., discovery rates under occlusion and interference) to support the central claims; without them the soundness cannot be verified.
  2. [Introduction and System Design] Core mechanism (Introduction and System Design): The approach fundamentally depends on reliable auto-reconnection or probing from victim devices to the mimicked SSID under wilderness conditions. Experiments must explicitly report reconnection rates across device heterogeneity, MAC randomization, variable occlusion, and interference; if these rates are low, the subsequent RSS direction finding and navigation innovations cannot compensate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Evaluation] Add a table or figure summarizing quantitative results (discovery time, range, accuracy) with baselines for comparison.
  2. [Direction Finding] Clarify whether the Luneburg Lens design is fully passive or requires any calibration parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and have made revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Evaluation] Abstract and Evaluation section: The abstract asserts 'high performance' from real-world experiments across devices and scenarios but provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, reconnection success rates, localization accuracy, or exclusion criteria. The full manuscript must include these data (e.g., discovery rates under occlusion and interference) to support the central claims; without them the soundness cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should summarize key quantitative results to better support the claims. The evaluation section already reports detailed metrics including reconnection success rates, localization accuracy with error bars, discovery rates under occlusion and interference, and performance across device types and scenarios. We have revised the abstract to explicitly include representative quantitative values (e.g., average localization error and success rates) drawn from these experiments, along with a brief statement on exclusion criteria. This change ensures the abstract provides the necessary support without altering the underlying data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Introduction and System Design] Core mechanism (Introduction and System Design): The approach fundamentally depends on reliable auto-reconnection or probing from victim devices to the mimicked SSID under wilderness conditions. Experiments must explicitly report reconnection rates across device heterogeneity, MAC randomization, variable occlusion, and interference; if these rates are low, the subsequent RSS direction finding and navigation innovations cannot compensate.

    Authors: We recognize the centrality of validating the auto-reconnection mechanism. Our prototype evaluation was conducted across multiple mobile devices and real-world wilderness settings that include variable occlusion and interference. To make the dependence explicit, we have added a dedicated subsection and table in the revised evaluation that reports reconnection rates broken down by device heterogeneity, MAC randomization behavior, occlusion levels, and interference conditions. These results confirm that reconnection occurs at rates sufficient to enable the direction-finding and navigation stages in the tested environments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; system relies on external standards and prototype evaluation

full rationale

The paper presents an engineering system for WiSAR that exploits standard Wi-Fi device reconnection behavior to known networks, combined with hardware (Luneburg Lens for RSS direction finding) and algorithmic (adaptive navigation) components. No equations, parameter fittings, or derivations are present that reduce any claimed result to inputs defined by the authors themselves. The three innovations are described as practical solutions to engineering challenges, with end-to-end prototype evaluation in real wilderness scenarios serving as the validation. Any self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the core mechanism, which draws from external Wi-Fi standards rather than self-referential definitions or predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that mobile devices will reliably attempt reconnection to mimicked networks in outdoor occluded environments and that RSS differences amplified by the lens translate directly to usable direction estimates without additional calibration.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Victims carry powered Wi-Fi-enabled mobile devices whose automatic reconnection behavior to known networks can be triggered by an on-drone access point.
    This is the foundational mechanism stated in the abstract for device discovery.
  • domain assumption A 3D-printed Luneburg Lens produces sufficient directional RSS variation to enable long-range bearing estimation in wilderness settings.
    Invoked to justify the novel direction-finding component.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1355 out tokens · 61922 ms · 2026-05-10T16:35:30.550639+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ali Abedi and Deepak Vasisht. 2022. Non-cooperative wi-fi localization & its privacy implications. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Interna- tional Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking . ACM, Sydney MobiCom ’26, October 26–30, 2026, Austin, TX, USA Hou et al. NSW Australia, 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495243.3560530

    work page doi:10.1145/3495243.3560530 2022

  2. [2]

    Acuna, A

    V. Acuna, A. Kumbhar, E. Vattapparamban, F. Rajabli, and I. Guvenc

    work page

  3. [3]

    In 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)

    Localization of WiFi Devices Using Probe Requests Captured at Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ WCNC.2017.7925654

    work page arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    & Abu Al-Rub, R

    Oraib Al-Ketan and Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub. 2019. Multifunc- tional Mechanical Metamaterials Based on Triply Periodic Mini- mal Surface Lattices. Advanced Engineering Materials 21, 10 (2019), 1900524. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201900524 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adem.201900524

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.201900524 2019

  5. [5]

    Abu Al-Rub

    Oraib Al-Ketan and Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub. 2021. MSLattice: A free software for generating uniform and graded lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. Material Design & Processing Communi- cations 3, 6 (2021), e205. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.205 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/mdp2.205

    work page doi:10.1002/mdp2.205 2021

  6. [6]

    Antonio Albanese, Vincenzo Sciancalepore, and Xavier Costa-Perez

    work page

  7. [7]

    IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 21, 9 (Sept

    SARDO: An Automated Search-and-Rescue Drone-Based Solu- tion for Victims Localization. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 21, 9 (Sept. 2022), 3312–3325. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2021.305 1273

    work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.305 2022

  8. [8]

    Mykhaylo Andriluka, Paul Schnitzspan, Johannes Meyer, Stefan Kohlbrecher, Karen Petersen, Oskar Von Stryk, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele. 2010. Vision based victim detection from unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1740–1747

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Bahl and V.N

    P. Bahl and V.N. Padmanabhan. 2000. RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064), Vol. 2. 775–784 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFC OM.2000.832252 ISSN: 0743-166X

    work page doi:10.1109/infc 2000

  10. [10]

    Jonathan Bor, Olivier Lafond, Hervé Merlet, Philippe Le Bars, and Mohamed Himdi. 2014. Foam Based Luneburg Lens Antenna at 60 GHz. Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters 44 (2014), 1–7. https: //doi.org/10.2528/PIERL13092405 Publisher: EMW Publishing

    work page doi:10.2528/pierl13092405 2014

  11. [11]

    Tomáš Bravenec, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, Michael Gould, and Tomas Fryza. 2023. UJI Probes: Dataset of Wi-Fi Probe Requests. In 2023 13th International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN57070.2023.10332508 arXiv:2308.04435 [cs]

    work page doi:10.1109/ipin57070.2023.10332508 2023

  12. [12]

    Meeting-merging-mission: A multi- robot coordinate framework for large-scale communication-limited exploration

    Daniel Broyles, Christopher R. Hayner, and Karen Leung. 2022. WiS- ARD: A Labeled Visual and Thermal Image Dataset for Wilderness Search and Rescue. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intel- ligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . 9467–9474. https://doi.org/10.1109/ IROS47612.2022.9981298 ISSN: 2153-0866

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Yijie Chen, Jiliang Wang, and Jing Yang. 2024. Exploiting Anchor Links for NLOS Combating in UWB Localization.ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 20, 3 (May 2024), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657639

    work page doi:10.1145/3657639 2024

  14. [14]

    L-P Chrétien, Jérôme Théau, and Patrick Menard. 2015. Wildlife mul- tispecies remote sensing using visible and thermal infrared imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (2015), 241–248

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    COMSOL. 2025. COMSOL: Multiphysics Software for Optimizing Designs. https://www.comsol.com/. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Krystal Dacey, Rachel Whitsed, and Prue Gonzalez. 2023. Understand- ing lost person behaviour in the Australian wilderness for search and rescue. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 10.47389/38, No 2 (April 2023), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.47389/38.2.29

    work page doi:10.47389/38 2023

  17. [17]

    Diulhio Candido De Oliveira and Marco Aurelio Wehrmeister. 2018. Using deep learning and low-cost RGB and thermal cameras to detect pedestrians in aerial images captured by multirotor UAV. Sensors 18, 7 (2018), 2244

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Jakob Derks, Lukas Giessen, and Georg Winkel. 2020. COVID-19- induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. Forest Policy and Economics 118 (Sept. 2020), 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253

    work page doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253 2020

  19. [19]

    DJI. 2025. Drone Rescue Map. https://enterprise.dji.com/drone-rescue- map. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    DJI Developer. 2025. DJI Payload SDK. https://developer.dji.com/doc/ payload-sdk-tutorial/en/. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    DJI Enterprise. 2025. Matrice 350 RTK. https://enterprise.dji.com/mat rice-350-rtk. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Ellis Fenske, Dane Brown, Jeremy Martin, Travis Mayberry, Peter Ryan, and Erik Rye. 2021. Three Years Later: A Study of MAC Address Randomization In Mobile Devices And When It Succeeds. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2021, 3 (July 2021), 164–181. https: //doi.org/10.2478/popets-2021-0042

    work page doi:10.2478/popets-2021-0042 2021

  23. [23]

    Julien Freudiger. 2015. How talkative is your mobile device?: an ex- perimental study of Wi-Fi probe requests. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks(2015). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8719030

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Jon Gjengset, Jie Xiong, Graeme McPhillips, and Kyle Jamieson. 2014. Phaser: enabling phased array signal processing on commodity WiFi access points. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, Maui Hawaii USA, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639108.2639139

    work page doi:10.1145/2639108.2639139 2014

  25. [25]

    Marco Gunia, Adrian Zinke, Niko Joram, and Frank Ellinger. 2023. Analysis and Design of a MuSiC-Based Angle of Arrival Positioning System. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 19, 3 (Aug. 2023), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3577927

    work page doi:10.1145/3577927 2023

  26. [26]

    Andreas Skriver Hansen, Thomas Beery, Peter Fredman, and Daniel Wolf-Watz. 2023. Outdoor recreation in Sweden during and after the COVID-19 pandemic – management and policy implications. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 66, 7 (June 2023), 1472–

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2029736

    work page doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2029736 2022

  28. [28]

    Yao-Hua Ho and Yu-Jung Tsai. 2022. Open Collaborative Platform for Multi-Drones to Support Search and Rescue Operations. Drones 6, 5 (May 2022), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6050132

    work page doi:10.3390/drones6050132 2022

  29. [29]

    IEEE Standards Association. 2009. IEEE Standard for Informa- tion technology– Local and metropolitan area networks– Specific requirements– Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: En- hancements for Higher Throughput. (2009), 1–565. https://doi.org/10 .1109/IEEESTD.2009.5307322

    work page arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Manikanta Kotaru, Kiran Joshi, Dinesh Bharadia, and Sachin Katti. 2015. SpotFi: Decimeter Level Localization Using WiFi. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication. ACM, London United Kingdom, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/27 85956.2787487

    work page doi:10.1145/27 2015

  31. [31]

    Bambu Lab. 2025. Bambu Lab X1 Carbon 3D Printer. https://us.store.b ambulab.com/collections/3d-printer/products/x1-carbon. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Frederik S Leira, Håkon Hagen Helgesen, Tor Arne Johansen, and Thor I Fossen. 2021. Object detection, recognition, and tracking from UAVs using a thermal camera. Journal of Field Robotics 38, 2 (2021), 242–267

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    R. K. Luneburg and Allen L. King. 1966. Mathematical Theory of Optics. American Journal of Physics 34 (1966), 80–81. https://api.semanticsc holar.org/CorpusID:120653112

    work page 1966

  34. [34]

    Mingyang Lyu, Yibo Zhao, Chao Huang, and Hailong Huang. 2023. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Search and Rescue: A Survey. Remote Sensing 15, 13 (June 2023), 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133266 Wi2SAR MobiCom ’26, October 26–30, 2026, Austin, TX, USA

    work page doi:10.3390/rs15133266 2023

  35. [35]

    Hui Feng Ma and Tie Jun Cui. 2010. Three-dimensional broadband and broad-angle transformation-optics lens. Nature Communications 1, 1 (Nov. 2010), 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1126

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1126 2010

  36. [36]

    Sami Ma, Yi Ching Chou, Miao Zhang, Hao Fang, Haoyuan Zhao, Jiangchuan Liu, and William I. Atlas. 2024. LEO Satellite Network Access in the Wild: Potentials, Experiences, and Challenges. IEEE Network 38, 6 (Nov. 2024), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2 024.3391271 arXiv:2405.06801 [cs]

    work page doi:10.1109/mnet.2 2024

  37. [39]

    Sloan Glover, and Derin Ozturk

    Andrew Moore, Nicholas Rymer, J. Sloan Glover, and Derin Ozturk

    work page

  38. [40]

    In 2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS)

    Predicting GPS Fidelity in Heavily Forested Areas. In 2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS) . IEEE, Monterey, CA, USA, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS53410.2 023.10140075

    work page doi:10.1109/plans53410.2 2023

  39. [41]

    Robin Murphy and Thomas Manzini. 2023. Improving Drone Imagery For Computer Vision/Machine Learning in Wilderness Search and Rescue. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR). IEEE, Naraha, Fukushima, Japan, 159–164. ht tps://doi.org/10.1109/SSRR59696.2023.10499934

    work page doi:10.1109/ssrr59696.2023.10499934 2023

  40. [42]

    Alejandro Blanco Pizarro, Joan Palacios Beltrán, Marco Cominelli, Francesco Gringoli, and Joerg Widmer. 2021. Accurate ubiquitous localization with off-the-shelf IEEE 802.11ac devices. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Ap- plications, and Services . ACM, Virtual Event Wisconsin, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/...

    work page doi:10.1145/3458864.3468850 2021

  41. [43]

    Kun Qian, Lulu Yao, Kai Zheng, Xinyu Zhang, and Tse Nga Ng. 2023. UniScatter: a Metamaterial Backscatter Tag for Wideband Joint Com- munication and Radar Sensing. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual In- ternational Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking . ACM, Madrid Spain, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570361.3592526

    work page doi:10.1145/3570361.3592526 2023

  42. [44]

    Raspberry Pi Foundation. 2025. Compute Module 4. https://www.rasp berrypi.com/products/compute-module-4/. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2025

    work page 2025

  43. [45]

    Kurmi, and O

    DC Schedl, I. Kurmi, and O. Bimber. 2021. An autonomous drone for search and rescue in forests using airborne optical sectioning. Science Robotics 6, 55 (June 2021), eabg1188. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobot ics.abg1188 Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobot 2021

  44. [46]

    Domien Schepers, Mathy Vanhoef, and Aanjhan Ranganathan. 2021. A framework to test and fuzz wi-fi devices. InProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks . ACM, Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates, 368–370. https://doi.org/10.1 145/3448300.3468261

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [47]

    Alan H. Schoen. 1970. Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self- intersections. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:119912824

    work page 1970

  46. [48]

    Elahe Soltanaghaei, Avinash Kalyanaraman, and Kamin Whitehouse

    work page

  47. [49]

    In Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services

    Multipath triangulation: Decimeter-level wifi localization and orientation with a single unaided receiver. In Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. 376–388

    work page

  48. [50]

    Yunpeng Sun, Xiangming Wen, Zhaoming Lu, Tao Lei, and Shan Jiang

    work page

  49. [51]

    In 2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops)

    Localization of WiFi Devices Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Search and Rescue. In 2018 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops) . IEEE, 147–152. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ICCChinaW.2018.8674518

    work page doi:10.1109/iccchinaw.2018.8674518 2018

  50. [52]

    Norbert Tuśnio and Wojciech Wróblewski. 2021. The Efficiency of Drones Usage for Safety and Rescue Operations in an Open Area: A Case from Poland. Sustainability 14, 1 (Dec. 2021), 327. https: //doi.org/10.3390/su14010327

    work page doi:10.3390/su14010327 2021

  51. [53]

    Mathy Vanhoef and Frank Piessens. 2017. Key Reinstallation Attacks: Forcing Nonce Reuse in WPA2. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (Dallas, Texas, USA) (CCS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1313–1328. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134027

    work page doi:10.1145/3133956.3134027 2017

  52. [54]

    Deepak Vasisht, Swarun Kumar, and Dina Katabi. 2016. {Decimeter- Level} localization with a single {WiFi} access point. In 13th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 16) . 165–178

    work page 2016

  53. [55]

    Fuhai Wang, Zhe Li, Rujing Xiong, Tiebin Mi, and Robert Caiming Qiu. 2025. WiCAL: Accurate Wi-Fi-Based 3D Localization Enabled by Collaborative Antenna Arrays. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505. 21408 arXiv:2505.21408 [eess]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505 2025

  54. [56]

    Wei Wang, Raj Joshi, Aditya Kulkarni, Wai Kay Leong, and Ben Leong

    work page

  55. [57]

    In Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems

    Feasibility study of mobile phone WiFi detection in aerial search and rescue operations. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems. ACM, Singapore Singapore, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2500727.2500729

    work page arXiv

  56. [58]

    Wei Wang, Philip Lambert, and Jonathan Chisum. 2023. High- frequency Limits for 3D-Printed Gradient-index (GRIN) Lens Antennas. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14863 arXiv:2304.14863 [eess]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [59]

    Judy Whiteside (Ed.). 2024. Mountain Rescue WINTER 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [60]

    Chuanming Wu, Yuqi He, Ge Zhao, and Luyu Zhao. 2022. Continuous Variable Dielectric Constant Luneburg Lens Antenna Based on 3D Printing Technology. In 2022 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT). IEEE, Harbin, China, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMMT55580.2022.10022890

    work page doi:10.1109/icmmt55580.2022.10022890 2022

  59. [61]

    Yaxiong Xie, Yanbo Zhang, Jansen Christian Liando, and Mo Li. 2018. SWAN: Stitched Wi-Fi ANtennas. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking . ACM, New Delhi India, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241539.3241572

    work page doi:10.1145/3241539.3241572 2018

  60. [62]

    Jie Xiong and Kyle Jamieson. 2013. ArrayTrack: A Fine-Grained Indoor Location System. (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [63]

    Zheng Yang, Chenshu Wu, and Yunhao Liu. 2012. Locating in fin- gerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human inter- vention. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking . ACM, Istanbul Turkey, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348543.2348578

    work page doi:10.1145/2348543.2348578 2012

  62. [64]

    Moustafa Youssef and Ashok Agrawala. 2005. The Horus WLAN location determination system. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services . ACM, Seattle Washington, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067170.1067193

    work page doi:10.1145/1067170.1067193 2005

  63. [65]

    Jaroslav Zechmeister and Jaroslav Lacik. 2019. Complex Relative Permittivity Measurement of Selected 3D-Printed Materials up to 10 GHz. In 2019 Conference on Microwave Techniques (COMITE) . IEEE, Pardubice, Czech Republic, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMITE.201 9.8733590

    work page doi:10.1109/comite.201 2019

  64. [66]

    Apolline Zehner, Iness Ben Guirat, and Jan Tobias Mühlberg. 2025. Privacy-Enhancing Technologies Against Physical-Layer and Link- Layer Device Tracking: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions. In Proceedings 2025 Workshop on Innovation in Metadata Privacy: Analysis and Construction Techniques . Internet Society, San Diego, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1...

    work page doi:10.14722/impact.2025.23080 2025

  65. [67]

    Bin-Bin Zhang, Dongheng Zhang, Ruiyuan Song, Binquan Wang, Yang Hu, and Yan Chen. 2023. RF-Search: Searching Unconscious Victim in Smoke Scenes with RF-enabled Drone. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking . ACM, Madrid Spain, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570361.3613305

    work page doi:10.1145/3570361.3613305 2023

  66. [68]

    Lingyan Zhang and Hongyu Wang. 2019. 3D-WiFi: 3D Localization With Commodity WiFi. IEEE Sensors Journal 19, 13 (2019), 5141–5152. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2900511 MobiCom ’26, October 26–30, 2026, Austin, TX, USA Hou et al

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2900511 2019

  67. [69]

    Jincao Zhu, Youngbin Im, Shivakant Mishra, and Sangtae Ha. 2017. Calibrating Time-variant, Device-specific Phase Noise for COTS WiFi Devices. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems . ACM, Delft Netherlands, 1–12. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3131672.3131695

    work page doi:10.1145/3131672.3131695 2017