pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10640 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 💻 cs.CE

Driving-Cycle-Aware Shape and Topology Optimization of an Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine for a Traction Drive

Alexander Schugardt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE
keywords interior permanent magnet synchronous machinetopology optimizationshape optimizationdriving cycletraction drivepermanent magnet reductionk-means clusteringrotor design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Driving-cycle-aware optimization reduces permanent magnet use by 10% in traction motors while keeping torque and efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a workflow to optimize the rotor of interior permanent magnet synchronous machines for electric vehicle traction drives by incorporating data from actual driving cycles. It applies k-means clustering to condense full cycles into a manageable set of representative operating points, enabling practical computation. The method integrates binary topology optimization for flux barriers with spline-based shape optimization for magnets, all under electromagnetic, mechanical, and voltage constraints, using Laplace mesh deformation to adjust geometry simultaneously. Two resulting rotor designs were built and experimentally tested, confirming the ability to cut permanent magnet material by up to 10 percent without loss of required torque or full-cycle efficiency.

Core claim

The paper establishes that a constraint-aware optimization pipeline, which reduces driving cycles to representative points via k-means clustering and combines binary topology optimization, Normalized Gaussian Networks, and spline shape optimization with Laplace-based mesh deformation, produces rotor designs that achieve up to 10% permanent magnet reduction while maintaining required torque capability and near-reference full-cycle efficiency, with validation through manufactured prototypes.

What carries the argument

The k-means clustering of driving cycles into representative points combined with Laplace-based mesh deformation to enable simultaneous binary topology optimization of flux barriers and spline shape optimization of magnet geometry under multiple constraints.

If this is right

  • Rotor designs require less permanent magnet material for the same torque output in traction applications.
  • Optimized machines achieve efficiency close to reference designs across full driving cycles.
  • The workflow respects inverter voltage limits and mechanical overspeed constraints during optimization.
  • Manufactured prototypes validate that simulated performance improvements hold in physical tests.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The clustering approach may extend to optimizing other electric machine types for application-specific duty cycles.
  • Lower magnet content could reduce material costs and supply risks in electric vehicle production.
  • Adding thermal or noise constraints to the same workflow might produce designs better suited for real-world integration.

Load-bearing premise

The k-means clustering of driving cycles into a small number of points sufficiently represents the full range of operating conditions so that optimized designs perform as predicted in actual vehicle use.

What would settle it

Full experimental testing or simulation of an optimized rotor on the complete un-clustered driving cycle that shows torque shortfalls or efficiency below the reference level would disprove the pipeline's effectiveness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10640 by Alexander Schugardt.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Considered scaled WMTC driving cycle for the electric scooter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measured B(H)-curves of M330-35A and C45 used in the electro￾magnetic model B. Driving cycle and vehicle model The machine is optimized for application as a traction motor in a small electric scooter with a maximum vehicle speed of 45 km/h. To reflect real operating conditions, the scaled World Motorcycle Test Cycle (WMTC) shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Proposed optimization framework for shape and topology optimization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Original and deformed mesh using the Laplace-based method with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spline-based smoothing of air-pocket boundaries obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: k-means clustering criteria ratio over different numbers of clusters for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Motor operating points and representative operating points (ROPs) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Results of all models from an optimization run using the binary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Results of shape and topology optimization over the driving cycle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Von Mises stress distribution of Rotor 4 at maximum overspeed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Manufactured rotor cores (Rotor 4 and Rotor 8) before magnet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Schematic diagram of the test bench used for validation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Coupled traction and load machines on the test bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Measured and simulated back-EMF at 22 ◦C and 3000 min−1 for Rotor 4, including measurement uncertainty band 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 Electrical angle in ° -40 -20 0 20 40 Voltage in V Phase U Phase V Phase W Measurement Simulation (a) Full period 120 150 180 210 240 Electrical angle in ° 15 20 25 30 35 Voltage in V Measurement Simulation Error band (b) Zoom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Measured and simulated back-EMF at 22 ◦C and 3000 min−1 for Rotor 8, including measurement uncertainty band 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Speed in min-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Torque in Nm (a) Simulation 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Speed in min-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 75 80 85 90 95 Efficiency in % (b) Measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Efficiency maps from simulation and measurement for Rotor 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a driving-cycle-aware shape and topology optimization workflow for interior permanent magnet synchronous machines used in traction drives. A k-means clustering approach reduces full driving cycles to representative operating points so that optimization remains computationally feasible while preserving realistic operating behavior. The workflow combines binary topology optimization, Normalized Gaussian Networks (NGnet), and spline-based shape optimization under electromagnetic, mechanical overspeed, and inverter voltage constraints. A Laplace-based mesh deformation strategy enables simultaneous optimization of magnet geometry and flux-barrier topology. Two optimized rotor designs are manufactured and tested experimentally. The central contribution is a validated, constraint-aware optimization pipeline that achieves permanent-magnet reduction of up to 10% while maintaining required torque capability and near-reference full-cycle efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a driving-cycle-aware shape and topology optimization workflow for interior permanent magnet synchronous machines (IPMSMs) in traction applications. It reduces full driving cycles to representative operating points via k-means clustering, integrates binary topology optimization with Normalized Gaussian Networks (NGnet) and spline-based shape optimization, enforces electromagnetic, mechanical overspeed, and inverter voltage constraints, and uses Laplace-based mesh deformation for simultaneous magnet and flux-barrier optimization. Two optimized rotor designs are manufactured and experimentally tested, with the central claim being a validated pipeline that achieves up to 10% permanent-magnet reduction while preserving required torque capability and near-reference full-cycle efficiency.

Significance. If the experimental results and full-cycle performance claims hold, the work would offer a practical, constraint-aware optimization pipeline for reducing rare-earth magnet content in EV traction motors without sacrificing performance. The combination of topology/shape optimization, driving-cycle reduction, and physical prototyping is a notable strength that could influence industrial design workflows, though the absence of detailed quantitative validation data in the current text limits assessment of its immediate applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of experimental validation for two manufactured designs with up to 10% magnet reduction and maintained torque/efficiency supplies no quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons to a reference design, or measurement protocols, rendering the performance assertions impossible to verify from the provided text.
  2. [Optimization workflow] k-means clustering approach (as described in the abstract and optimization workflow): optimization and constraint enforcement occur only on the reduced set of representative points, yet no post-optimization evaluation of the final designs on the full unreduced driving cycle is reported to quantify maximum deviations in torque or losses at un-clustered transients or edge cases; this directly undermines the 'near-reference full-cycle efficiency' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions to the text are planned.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of experimental validation for two manufactured designs with up to 10% magnet reduction and maintained torque/efficiency supplies no quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons to a reference design, or measurement protocols, rendering the performance assertions impossible to verify from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, constrained by length, omits specific quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons, and measurement protocols. These details appear in the experimental validation section of the full manuscript, where the two manufactured rotors are compared against the reference design. We will revise the abstract to incorporate key quantitative metrics, including the achieved magnet reduction, torque values, efficiency figures, and a reference to the experimental protocols. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Optimization workflow] k-means clustering approach (as described in the abstract and optimization workflow): optimization and constraint enforcement occur only on the reduced set of representative points, yet no post-optimization evaluation of the final designs on the full unreduced driving cycle is reported to quantify maximum deviations in torque or losses at un-clustered transients or edge cases; this directly undermines the 'near-reference full-cycle efficiency' claim.

    Authors: Optimization and constraint enforcement were performed exclusively on the k-means clustered points to maintain computational tractability. The manuscript asserts near-reference full-cycle efficiency on the basis of this approach, but we acknowledge that an explicit post-optimization verification on the complete unreduced driving cycle—with quantified maximum deviations in torque and losses at un-clustered points—is not reported in sufficient detail. We will add this evaluation to the revised manuscript, including the observed deviations, to support the efficiency claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in optimization workflow or validation

full rationale

The paper describes a forward computational pipeline: k-means clustering reduces driving cycles to representative points, followed by binary topology optimization, NGnet, spline shape optimization, and Laplace mesh deformation under explicit electromagnetic, mechanical, and voltage constraints. Two rotor designs are manufactured and experimentally tested to support claims of up to 10% PM reduction with maintained torque and near-reference efficiency. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the abstract or described workflow. Performance assertions rest on physical prototypes rather than quantities defined by the optimization inputs themselves, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; the paper relies on standard assumptions from optimization and electromagnetic modeling rather than new postulates. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Number of k-means clusters
    Chosen to balance computational cost against cycle representation; specific value and selection criterion not stated in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption k-means clustering of driving-cycle data preserves the essential torque and efficiency behavior needed for reliable optimization
    Invoked to justify reducing full cycles to representative points while claiming realistic performance.
  • domain assumption Laplace-based mesh deformation produces valid, artifact-free geometry updates during simultaneous magnet and barrier optimization
    Required for the shape-topology co-optimization step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5416 in / 1537 out tokens · 48828 ms · 2026-05-10T15:41:55.415627+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aliprantis and O

    D. Aliprantis and O. Wasynczuk,Electric Machines: Theory and Anal- ysis Using the Finite Element Method. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022, doi: 10.1017/9781108529280

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108529280 2022

  2. [2]

    Pyrhonen, T

    J. Pyrhonen, T. Jokinen, and V . Hrabovcova,Design of Rotat- ing Electrical Machines. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013, doi: 10.1002/9781118701591

    work page doi:10.1002/9781118701591 2013

  3. [3]

    Topology Optimization for Electromagnetics: A Survey,

    F. Lucchini, R. Torchio, V . Cirimele, P. Alotto, and P. Bettini, “Topology Optimization for Electromagnetics: A Survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 98593–98611, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3206368

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3206368 2022

  4. [4]

    Design Optimization Methodology for High-Frequency Rotary Transformers for Contactless Power Transfer Systems,

    F. N. U. Nishanth and B. Wang, “Topology Optimization of Electric Machines: A Review,” inProc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo. (ECCE), 2022, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/ECCE50734.2022.9948073

    work page doi:10.1109/ecce50734.2022.9948073 2022

  5. [5]

    Topology optimization approaches.Structural and Multi- disciplinary Optimization, 48(6):1031–1055, 2013

    O. Sigmund and K. Maute, “Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review,”Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1031–1055, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6 2013

  6. [6]

    Electrical Machine Design by optimization for E-motor Application: A Drive Cycle Approach,

    J. F. Cardoso, C. Chillet, L. Gerbaud, and L. A. Belhaj, “Electrical Machine Design by optimization for E-motor Application: A Drive Cycle Approach,” inProc. Int. Conf. Elect. Mach. (ICEM), 2020, pp. 2514–2519, doi: 10.1109/ICEM49940.2020.9270888

    work page doi:10.1109/icem49940.2020.9270888 2020

  7. [7]

    Traction PMASR Motor Op- timization According to a Given Driving Cycle,

    E. Carraro, M. Morandin, and N. Bianchi, “Traction PMASR Motor Op- timization According to a Given Driving Cycle,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 209–216, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2015.2477479

    work page doi:10.1109/tia.2015.2477479 2016

  8. [8]

    Large- scale electromagnetic design optimization of PM machines over a target operating cycle,

    A. Fatemi, N. A. O. Demerdash, D. M. Ionel, and T. W. Nehl, “Large- scale electromagnetic design optimization of PM machines over a target operating cycle,” inProc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo. (ECCE), 2015, pp. 4383–4390, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2015.7310279

    work page doi:10.1109/ecce.2015.7310279 2015

  9. [9]

    Barlow, S

    T. Barlow, S. Latham, I. McCrae, and P. Boulter,A Reference Book of Driving Cycles for Use in the Measurement of Road Vehicle Emissions. TRL Published Project Report, 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Petrowski and S

    A. Petrowski and S. Ben-Hamida,Evolutionary Algorithms. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Space-time correlation properties of the magnetization process and eddy current losses: Theory,

    G. Bertotti, “Space-time correlation properties of the magnetization process and eddy current losses: Theory,”J. Appl. Phys., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 5293–5305, Sep. 1983, doi: 10.1063/1.332705

    work page doi:10.1063/1.332705 1983

  12. [12]

    Overview and Comparison of Iron Loss Models for Electrical Machines,

    A. Krings and J. Soulard, “Overview and Comparison of Iron Loss Models for Electrical Machines,”J. Electr. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 162–169, May 2010

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Fast Determination of Transient Short-Circuit Current of PM Synchronous Machines via Magnetostatic Flux Maps,

    S. Ferrari, G. Dilevrano, P. Ragazzo, P. Pescetto, and G. Pellegrino, “Fast Determination of Transient Short-Circuit Current of PM Synchronous Machines via Magnetostatic Flux Maps,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 4000–4009, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2023.3265952

    work page doi:10.1109/tia.2023.3265952 2023

  14. [15]

    Topology optimization and param- eter optimization hybridized by mesh smoothing for IPMSM design,

    Z. Sun, T. Sato, and K. Watanabe, “Topology optimization and param- eter optimization hybridized by mesh smoothing for IPMSM design,” COMPEL, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1133–1147, 2023, doi: 10.1108/COMPEL- 12-2022-0426

    work page doi:10.1108/compel- 2023

  15. [16]

    A Mesh Deformation Technique Based on Solid Mechan- ics for Parametric Analysis of High-Frequency Devices With 3-D FEM,

    A. Lamecki, “A Mesh Deformation Technique Based on Solid Mechan- ics for Parametric Analysis of High-Frequency Devices With 3-D FEM,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 3400–3408, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2016.2605672

    work page doi:10.1109/tmtt.2016.2605672 2016

  16. [17]

    A Mesh Deformation Algo- rithm and Its Application in Optimal Motor Design,

    L. Yang, S. L. Ho, W. N. Fu, and L. Liu, “A Mesh Deformation Algo- rithm and Its Application in Optimal Motor Design,”IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–4, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2490249

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2015.2490249 2016

  17. [18]

    Determination of Number of Clusters in K-Means Clustering and Application in Colour Image Segmentation,

    S. Ray and R. Turi, “Determination of Number of Clusters in K-Means Clustering and Application in Colour Image Segmentation,” inProc. 4th Int. Conf. Adv. Pattern Recognit. Digit. Tech., 2000

    work page 2000

  18. [19]

    Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008

    JCGM 100:2008,Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Ex- pression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008

    work page 2008