arxiv: 2604.10829 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: unknown

MicroVRide: Exploring 4-in-1 Virtual Reality Micromobility Simulator

Xiaoyan Zhou , Natalia Sempere , Pooria Ghavamian , Asreen Rostami , Andrii Matviienko

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC

keywords virtual realitymicromobilitysimulatore-scooterSegwayelectric unicycleone-wheeled skateboardrider experience

0 comments

The pith

A single modular VR platform can simulate e-scooters, Segways, electric unicycles, and one-wheeled skateboards while preserving each vehicle's distinct physical controls.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces MicroVRide, a virtual reality simulator designed to handle four different micromobility vehicles through one adjustable hardware and software setup. The aim is to create a safe, controlled space for studying rider experiences and performance without exposing people to real-world crash risks. By keeping the specific balance, steering, and movement rules for each vehicle type intact, the system supports direct comparisons of how riders behave on e-scooters versus Segways, unicycles, or skateboards. A test with twelve participants showed the platform works in practice and produces clearly different rider sensations across the four vehicles. This addresses the lack of low-risk tools for examining these growing short-distance transport options.

Core claim

MicroVRide is a modular 4-in-1 VR micromobility simulator that supports e-scooters, Segways, electric unicycles, and one-wheeled skateboards on a single platform. The simulator preserves vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors, enabling the study of diverse riding behaviors with minimal hardware reconfiguration. The authors contribute the simulator design and report a preliminary within-subject study (N = 12) that demonstrates feasibility and reveals distinct experiential profiles across vehicles.

What carries the argument

The modular hardware-software platform that switches vehicle modes while retaining each micromobility type's unique physical constraints and control metaphors.

If this is right

Researchers can test multiple vehicle types in one session without rebuilding physical setups.
Direct comparisons of rider behavior become possible across e-scooters, Segways, unicycles, and skateboards.
Vehicle design changes can be evaluated for user experience before any physical prototypes are built.
Safety training scenarios for new riders can be created in a repeatable, low-risk setting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The simulator could be extended to include virtual traffic or weather to study how riders adapt under varied conditions.
Data gathered here might help city planners decide where different micromobility vehicles can safely operate.
Validation against real rides would strengthen the case for using this platform in regulatory or educational contexts.

Load-bearing premise

The virtual reality environment accurately reproduces the physical sensations, balance requirements, and control inputs of each real-world micromobility vehicle.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison where rider stability, speed selection, turning patterns, and reported experiences in the simulator are measured against the same metrics collected during actual outdoor rides on the four vehicles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10829 by Andrii Matviienko, Asreen Rostami, Natalia Sempere, Pooria Ghavamian, Xiaoyan Zhou.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: We investigated four routes with each vehicle (left) that contained coins placed at equal distances from each other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (Left) Raw NASA-TLX scores per vehicle. (Right) Likert ratings for control, stability/predictability, and embodiment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: NASA-TLX subscale scores by vehicle (mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Micromobility vehicles, such as e-scooters, Segways, skateboards, and unicycles, are increasingly adopted for short-distance travel due to their low weight and low emissions. Despite their growing popularity, we lack controlled, low-risk environments to study rider experiences and performance. While virtual reality (VR) simulators offer a promising approach by reducing safety risks and providing immersive experiences, micromobility simulators remain largely underexplored. We introduce MicroVRide, a modular 4-in-1 VR micromobility simulator that supports e-scooters, Segways, electric unicycles, and one-wheeled skateboards on a single platform. The simulator preserves vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors, enabling the study of diverse riding behaviors with minimal hardware reconfiguration. We contribute the simulator design and report a preliminary within-subject study (N = 12) that demonstrates feasibility and reveals distinct experiential profiles across vehicles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MicroVRide gives a modular VR simulator for multiple micromobility vehicles but falls short on validating the physical fidelity.

read the letter

Hi colleague, This paper introduces MicroVRide, a single VR hardware platform that can be reconfigured for four micromobility vehicles: e-scooters, Segways, electric unicycles, and one-wheeled skateboards. The key is that it tries to keep the physical constraints and control metaphors specific to each one, so you can study riding behaviors across them with less setup hassle. They back this with a within-subject feasibility study involving 12 participants, which found distinct experiential profiles for the different vehicles. What stands out is the engineering practicality. Building separate simulators for each vehicle type would be expensive and time-consuming, so this modular approach addresses a real gap in controlled micromobility research. It's a safe environment for looking at rider performance and experiences without the dangers of real streets. On the downside, the evidence for the central claim is thin. The study relies on subjective reports from users inside the simulator, but there's no quantitative validation against actual vehicle dynamics like measured acceleration, balance recovery, or steering forces. Without that, it's hard to know if the observed differences truly reflect the vehicle-specific aspects or are artifacts of the VR setup or the way the controls were implemented. The abstract also skips details on the exact measures used, statistical methods, or any error handling, which makes it tough to assess how solid the feasibility results are. This kind of work is aimed at HCI researchers focused on virtual simulations for transportation and mobility. A reader interested in developing or using VR tools for studying rider behavior would get value from the design description and the initial findings. Overall, the paper deserves a serious referee. The novelty in the 4-in-1 design is clear, and it engages honestly with the need for better study environments, even if more validation work is needed to strengthen the claims.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MicroVRide, a modular 4-in-1 VR micromobility simulator that supports e-scooters, Segways, electric unicycles, and one-wheeled skateboards on a single platform while preserving vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors. It reports a preliminary within-subject feasibility study (N=12) demonstrating feasibility and revealing distinct experiential profiles across vehicles.

Significance. If the simulator's fidelity to real vehicle dynamics holds, the modular platform would enable efficient, low-risk HCI studies of diverse micromobility behaviors, a valuable contribution given the growing adoption of these vehicles. The design's minimal reconfiguration aspect is a practical strength for experimentation. However, without grounding in real-world validation, the significance is currently limited to a system description and subjective feasibility report.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / Study section] Abstract / Study section: The within-subject feasibility study with N=12 is said to reveal distinct experiential profiles, but provides no details on the specific measures (e.g., questionnaires, performance metrics), statistical analysis methods, error handling, or quantitative results. This makes it impossible to assess whether the data support the claims.
[Simulator design / Introduction] Simulator design / Introduction: The central claim that MicroVRide 'preserves vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors' is load-bearing for the contribution but lacks supporting evidence such as physics-engine validation against manufacturer specifications, measured roll/pitch/steering responses, balance recovery times, or any cross-comparison to real-vehicle riding data.

minor comments (2)

Add a dedicated section or subsection detailing the hardware components, software implementation (e.g., Unity/Unreal physics parameters), and exact participant protocol to support reproducibility.
Clarify in the study description how 'distinct experiential profiles' were identified (e.g., via specific statistical tests or qualitative coding) and report effect sizes or confidence intervals where applicable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

Thank you for the referee's constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The within-subject feasibility study with N=12 is said to reveal distinct experiential profiles, but provides no details on the specific measures (e.g., questionnaires, performance metrics), statistical analysis methods, error handling, or quantitative results. This makes it impossible to assess whether the data support the claims.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from greater detail on the study. Although presented as a preliminary feasibility assessment, we will expand the Study section in the revision to specify the questionnaires and performance metrics used, the statistical analysis methods applied (including any tests and handling of assumptions), error/outlier procedures, and quantitative results with supporting tables or figures. This will enable readers to evaluate the claims directly. revision: yes
Referee: The central claim that MicroVRide 'preserves vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors' is load-bearing for the contribution but lacks supporting evidence such as physics-engine validation against manufacturer specifications, measured roll/pitch/steering responses, balance recovery times, or any cross-comparison to real-vehicle riding data.

Authors: This observation is valid. The manuscript describes the modular hardware and tuned Unity parameters intended to approximate vehicle-specific behaviors but does not include quantitative validation data. We will revise the Simulator design section to provide explicit implementation details on how constraints and control mappings are realized for each vehicle and will qualify the preservation claim while noting the lack of direct real-world comparisons as a limitation. Full empirical validation remains a valuable avenue for future work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Quantitative empirical validation data (e.g., measured dynamics compared to real vehicles), as such measurements were not collected during the preliminary study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: system description and feasibility study are self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a modular VR micromobility simulator and reports a small within-subject feasibility study (N=12) with subjective experiential profiles. No equations, parameter fitting, predictions, or derivations appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on the hardware/software design description and user reports rather than any self-referential reduction or self-citation chain. This is a standard system paper with no load-bearing steps that reduce to their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard HCI assumptions about VR fidelity rather than new postulates or fitted parameters.

axioms (1)

domain assumption VR environments can preserve vehicle-specific physical constraints and control metaphors sufficiently to study real riding behaviors
Invoked to justify that simulator observations transfer to real-world insights; appears in the abstract's description of the design goal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1278 out tokens · 33179 ms · 2026-05-10T15:16:54.968910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Mustafa Al-Kefagy and Sava Pokrajac. 2021. E-bike Simulator-a virtual reality application that evaluates user interfaces in an urban traffic environment. (2021)

2021
[2]

Ammar Al-Taie, Andrii Matviienko, Joseph O’Hagan, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2025. Around the World in 60 Cyclists: Evaluat- ing Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interfaces Across Cultures. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article...

work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3713407 2025
[3]

Barcelona Sun Segway. [n. d.]. A Beginner’s Guide to Riding a Segway. https: //www.barcelonasunsegway.com/a-beginners-guide-to-riding-a-segway/. Ac- cessed: 2026-01-22

2026
[4]

Ognjen Bobičić and Domokos Esztergár-Kiss. 2024. Enablers and barriers to mi- cromobility adoption: Urban and suburban contexts.Journal of Cleaner Production 484 (2024), 144346. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144346

work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144346 2024
[5]

Buning, Anne Hardy, Jonathan Corcoran, Dorina Pojani, Zhenpeng Zou, and Milly Chen

Richard J. Buning, Anne Hardy, Jonathan Corcoran, Dorina Pojani, Zhenpeng Zou, and Milly Chen. 2025. Charting a research agenda for micromobility and tourism.Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights6, 1 (2025), 100164. doi:10. 1016/j.annale.2024.100164

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Eunhee Chang, Hyun Taek Kim, and Byounghyun Yoo. 2020. Vir- tual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements.Inter- national Journal of Human–Computer Interaction36, 17 (2020), 1658–1682. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351 doi:10.1080/10447318.2020. 1778351

work page doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351 2020
[7]

Zoi Christoforou, Anastasios Kallianiotis, and Nadir Farhi. 2025. Design, De- velopment, and Validation of Driving Simulators for Enhancing the Safety and Sustainability of Electric Microvehicles.Sustainability17, 7 (2025). doi:10.3390/ su17073260

2025
[8]

Jiyong Chung, Hyeokmin Lee, Hosang Moon, and Eunghyuk Lee. 2022. The static and dynamic analyses of drivers’ gaze movement using vr driving simulator. Applied Sciences12, 5 (2022), 2362

2022
[9]

David Flaig, Hannes Imschweiler, Jana Heimel, and Gerrit Meixner. 2025. Imple- menting a VR-Enabled Bicycle Simulator: Integrating Physical Sensor and Actua- tor Data for a Realistic Simulation Experience. InIntelligent Human Computer Interaction, Dhananjay Singh, Jan-Willem van ’t Klooster, and Uma Shanker Tiwary (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham...

2025
[10]

Jelle Haasnoot, Riender Happee, Volkert van der Wijk, and Arend L. Schwab. 2024. Validation of a novel bicycle simulator with realistic lat- eral and roll motion.Vehicle System Dynamics62, 7 (2024), 1802–1826. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2023.2264418 doi:10.1080/00423114.2023. 2264418

work page doi:10.1080/00423114.2023.2264418 2024
[11]

Wei He, Xiang Li, Per Ola Kristensson, and Guo Li Lan. 2026. LocoScooter: Designing a Stationary Scooter-Based Locomotion System for Navigation in Virtual Reality. InProceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR 2026). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA. Forthcoming

2026
[12]

Philipp Hock, Sebastian Benedikter, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. CarVR: Enabling In-Car Virtual Reality Entertainment. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4034–4044. doi:10.1145/3025453.3025665

work page doi:10.1145/3025453.3025665 2017
[13]

Morteza Hossein Sabbaghian, David Llopis-Castelló, and Alfredo García. 2023. A Safe Infrastructure for Micromobility: The Current State of Knowledge.Sustain- ability15, 13 (2023). doi:10.3390/su151310140

work page doi:10.3390/su151310140 2023
[14]

InMotion World. [n. d.]. How to Ride an Electric Unicycle (EUC) for Begin- ners. https://inmotionworld.com/blogs/blog/how-to-ride-an-electric-unicycle. Accessed: 2026-01-22

2026
[15]

2020.Safe Micromobility

International Transport Forum. 2020.Safe Micromobility. Technical Report. International Transport Forum (ITF), OECD. https://www.itf-oecd.org/safe- micromobility Accessed: 2026-01-22

2020
[16]

Anastasios Kallianiotis, Stergios Roumeliotis, Zoi Christoforou, Nadir Farhi, and Chang Chen. 2025. Implementing a Novel E-Bicycle Simulator

2025
[17]

Kanishka Kataria, J Chandana, Athira Raghumadhavan, Komal Gandhi, Kartik Raja, and Shilpa Gite. 2023. Virtual Reality Skateboard Extending Metaverse. Journal of Metaverse3, 2 (2023), 100–107

2023
[18]

Jonas Keppel, Marvin Prochazka, Stefan Lewin, Markus Stroehnisch, Marvin Strauss, André Zenner, Donald Degraen, Andrii Matviienko, and Stefan Schnee- gass. 2026. Determining Perception Thresholds for Real and Virtual Inclinations While Cycling in Virtual Reality. InProceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Barcelona, Spa...

work page doi:10.1145/3772318.3791538 2026
[19]

Théo Lefeuvre. [n. d.]. Electric scooter simulator in virtual reality. https://www. youtube.com/shorts/Hwd_wSWANd4
[20]

Zhixun Lin, Wei He, Xinyi Liu, Mingchen Ye, Xiang Li, and Ge Lin Kan. 2024. The Framework of NAVIS: Navigating Virtual Spaces with Immersive Scooters. InProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 448–450. doi:10.1145/3701571.3703381

work page doi:10.1145/3701571.3703381 2024
[21]

Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Yan- nick Feld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Augmenting bicycles and helmets with multimodal warnings for children. InProceedings of the 20th In- ternational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(Barcelona, Spain)(MobileHCI ’18). Association fo...

work page doi:10.1145/3229434.3229479 2018
[22]

Andrii Matviienko, Hajris Hoxha, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2023. What does it mean to cycle in Virtual Reality? Exploring Cycling Fidelity and Control of VR Bicycle Simulators. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 879, 15 pages. ...

work page doi:10.1145/3544548 2023
[23]

Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Dominik Schön, Régis Fayard, Salar Abaspur, Yi Li, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. E-ScootAR: Exploring Unimodal Warnings for E-Scooter Riders in Augmented Reality. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New Y...

work page doi:10.1145/3491101.3519831 2022
[24]

Andrii Matviienko, Florian Müller, Marcel Zickler, Lisa Alina Gasche, Julia Abels, Till Steinert, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness for Cyclists in VR Bicycle Simulators. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY...

work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3501959 2022
[25]

Lennart Ochel, Smit Saparia, My Weidel, Arne Johansson, and Katja Kircher
[26]

How We Roll: Realistic Cycling Simulator for Behavioural Research. In24th Driving Simulation Extended Reality Conference & Exhibition (DSC 2025 Europe MicroVRide: Exploring 4-in-1 Virtual Reality Micromobility Simulator CHI EA ’26, April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain XR), Stuttgart, Germany, September 24-26, 2025.Driving Simulation Association, 53–58

2025
[27]

Onewheel Wiki contributors. [n. d.]. Riding technique. https://onewheel.wiki/ Riding_technique. Accessed: 2026-01-22

2026
[28]

Baraah Qawasmeh, Jun-Seok Oh, and Valerian Kwigizile. 2024. Micro-Mobility Safety Assessment: Analyzing Factors Influencing the Micro-Mobility Injuries in Michigan by Mining Crash Reports.Future Transportation4, 4 (2024), 1580–1601. doi:10.3390/futuretransp4040076

work page doi:10.3390/futuretransp4040076 2024
[29]

2021.E-scooter simulator development and applications

Weitong Qi. 2021.E-scooter simulator development and applications. Master’s thesis. University of Missouri-Columbia

2021
[30]

Rider Guide. [n. d.]. How to Ride an Electric Scooter. https://riderguide.com/ safety/how-to-ride-an-electric-scooter/. Accessed: 2026-01-22

2026
[31]

Sandro Ropelato, Fabio Zünd, Stéphane Magnenat, Marino Menozzi, and Robert Sumner. 2018. Adaptive tutoring on a virtual reality driving simulator.In- ternational SERIES on information systems and management in creative emedia (CreMedia)2017, 2 (2018), 12–17

2018
[32]

Craig R. Sherman. 2006. Motion Sickness: Review of Causes and Pre- ventive Strategies.Journal of Travel Medicine9, 5 (03 2006), 251–256. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article-pdf/9/5/251/5246184/jtm9-0251.pdf doi:10.2310/7060.2002.24145

work page doi:10.2310/7060.2002.24145 2006
[33]

2024.City Micromobility Street Safety

The Wall Street Journal. 2024.City Micromobility Street Safety. https://www.wsj. com/lifestyle/cars/city-micromobility-street-safety-420ccae3 Accessed: 2026-01- 22

2024
[34]

Philipp Wintersberger, Andrii Matviienko, Andreas Schweidler, and Florian Michahelles. 2022. Development and Evaluation of a Motion-based VR Bicycle Simulator.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.6, MHCI, Article 210 (Sept. 2022), 19 pages. doi:10.1145/3546745

work page doi:10.1145/3546745 2022
[35]

Ziyue Zhao, Yue Li, and Hai-Ning Liang. 2023. LeanOn: Simulating Balance Vehicle Locomotion in Virtual Reality. In2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 415–424. doi:10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023. 00056

work page doi:10.1109/ismar59233.2023 2023
[36]

Åkesson, Ludvig and Buhrman, Joel. 2018. DriVR - A driving school simulator in VR. Student Paper

2018