Unfolding unstable skyrmionic polarization textures

Nilo Mata-Cervera; Yijie Shen; Zhenyu Guo

arxiv: 2604.13601 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Unfolding unstable skyrmionic polarization textures

Nilo Mata-Cervera , Zhenyu Guo , Yijie Shen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics

keywords skyrmionspolarization texturesvortex beamstopological chargephase singularitiesoptical polarizationskyrmion numberpolarization singularities

0 comments

The pith

The skyrmion number in polarization textures from vortex superpositions equals the maximum vortex charge once any perturbation splits the phase singularities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that skyrmionic polarization patterns created by overlapping two vortex beams change their topological charge when even tiny perturbations separate coalesced phase singularities. Instead of the skyrmion number remaining the difference between the two vortex orders, it becomes the larger of the two orders. A sympathetic reader cares because these textures are proposed for wavelength-scale localization in optics, yet real systems always contain aberrations or noise that would trigger this change. The result reframes how stable such topological features can be in practical light beams.

Core claim

In a superposition of two vortex beams, the skyrmion number of the resulting polarization texture generally depends on the higher order topological charge Q_sk = max(ℓ₂, ℓ₁) rather than the difference Q_sk = ℓ₂ - ℓ₁, which only holds in the absence of perturbation. An arbitrarily small perturbation splits the coalescent phase singularities and thereby alters the topological charge. These results have significant implications for polarization structures with wavelength-scale localization and those experiencing complex aberrations.

What carries the argument

The splitting of coalescent phase singularities by arbitrarily small perturbations, which redefines the skyrmion number from the vortex charge difference to the maximum vortex charge.

If this is right

Skyrmion number equals max(ℓ₂, ℓ₁) for any nonzero perturbation.
The difference ℓ₂ - ℓ₁ applies only in the ideal unperturbed case.
Wavelength-scale localized polarization skyrmions inherit this altered topology.
Complex aberrations in real beams will generally enforce the maximum-charge regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Every laboratory realization will exhibit the maximum-charge skyrmion number because perfect cancellation of perturbations is impossible.
The same splitting mechanism may apply to other singular optical textures such as optical merons or polarization hopfions.
Designs relying on exact charge differences for information encoding would need active stabilization against phase noise.
Controlled perturbation experiments could map the threshold at which the topological transition occurs as a function of beam parameters.

Load-bearing premise

An arbitrarily small perturbation suffices to split coalescent phase singularities and change the topological charge from the difference to the maximum.

What would settle it

Perform polarization mapping on a controlled superposition of two vortex beams, introduce a tunable sub-wavelength phase perturbation, and check whether the extracted skyrmion number jumps to max(ℓ₂, ℓ₁) or stays at ℓ₂ - ℓ₁.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13601 by Nilo Mata-Cervera, Yijie Shen, Zhenyu Guo.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerically integrated PS coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Experimental setup. PBS: polarizing beam splitter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Experimentally retrieved PS coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Polarization of light can form skyrmionic textures, akin to nonlinear solitons in condensed matter, yet their disparate physical context has motivated extensive debate regarding their stability. Here we show that the topological charge of such structures (skyrmion number) changes when an arbitrarily small perturbation splits coalescent phase singularities. In a superposition of two vortex beams, the skyrmion number generally only depends on the higher order topological charge $\lrr{Q_{\rm sk}=\max\lr{\ell_2,\ell_1}}$ rather than the difference of charges of the vortices in superposition $\lrr{Q_{\rm sk}=\ell_2-\ell_1}$, which only holds in the absence of perturbation. These results have significant implications for polarization structures with wavelength-scale localization and those experiencing complex aberrations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims tiny perturbations switch the skyrmion number from the charge difference to the maximum in vortex superpositions, but the supporting steps are not shown clearly enough to confirm it holds generally.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the skyrmion number in these polarization textures switches from depending on the difference of the two vortex charges to depending on the larger one once any small perturbation splits the coalesced singularities. The unperturbed case keeps the difference, but the paper says the general case uses the max. This is presented as a new observation with implications for wavelength-scale structures and real aberrations. The work does a reasonable job flagging why stability questions in singular optics matter for device contexts and why the unperturbed formulas might not carry over directly. It keeps the focus on practical topological charge behavior rather than abstract math alone. The soft spots sit in the central step. The claim requires that every infinitesimal perturbation lifts the degeneracy in a way that changes the skyrmion integral without adding compensating defects elsewhere, yet the abstract gives no explicit perturbation form, no analytic continuation across the point, and no check that the integral stays quantized. The stress-test note correctly flags this gap. If the full manuscript supplies concrete numerics or a worked example that shows the split for multiple perturbation types, that would strengthen it; without that, the shift from difference to max reads more as an observation than a derived necessity. This paper is aimed at people working in topological photonics and singular optics who care about how polarization textures hold up under realistic conditions. A reader already familiar with skyrmion numbers in optics could extract the idea and test it in their own setups, but someone outside the subfield would need the missing derivation filled in. I would send it for peer review because the topic is relevant and the claim could matter if the perturbation analysis is tightened, though I would expect referees to ask for explicit checks on generality and quantization preservation.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines skyrmionic polarization textures formed by superpositions of two vortex beams with topological charges ℓ1 and ℓ2. It claims that the skyrmion number Q_sk equals max(ℓ2, ℓ1) in the presence of an arbitrarily small perturbation that splits coalescent phase singularities, whereas the unperturbed superposition yields only Q_sk = ℓ2 − ℓ1. The result is presented as having implications for the stability of wavelength-scale localized polarization structures and those subject to complex aberrations.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated with explicit derivations, it would clarify the role of perturbations in determining topological invariants for optical skyrmions, potentially explaining observed instabilities and informing the design of robust polarization textures in singular optics.

major comments (2)

Abstract: the assertion that Q_sk generally equals max(ℓ2, ℓ1) once an arbitrarily small perturbation splits the singularities is stated without derivation, analytic continuation of the skyrmion density, or demonstration that the integral remains quantized after the split. The transition from the difference to the maximum requires an explicit perturbation Hamiltonian and verification that no compensating defects appear elsewhere.
Abstract: the claim that every infinitesimal perturbation (regardless of functional form) lifts the degeneracy and alters the winding captured by the skyrmion-number integral is not supported by any calculation or limiting-case analysis; the manuscript must show that the skyrmion number integral changes for generic perturbations while remaining an integer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional clarity and supporting details where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the assertion that Q_sk generally equals max(ℓ2, ℓ1) once an arbitrarily small perturbation splits the singularities is stated without derivation, analytic continuation of the skyrmion density, or demonstration that the integral remains quantized after the split. The transition from the difference to the maximum requires an explicit perturbation Hamiltonian and verification that no compensating defects appear elsewhere.

Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the result in a concise manner without embedding the full derivation. The main text derives the skyrmion number from the integral of the skyrmion density, applies analytic continuation to the perturbed polarization field, and demonstrates that the integral remains an integer. To address the concern directly, we have expanded the abstract with a brief outline of the key steps and added an explicit perturbation Hamiltonian example in the revised manuscript, together with verification that no compensating defects are introduced elsewhere in the field. revision: yes
Referee: Abstract: the claim that every infinitesimal perturbation (regardless of functional form) lifts the degeneracy and alters the winding captured by the skyrmion-number integral is not supported by any calculation or limiting-case analysis; the manuscript must show that the skyrmion number integral changes for generic perturbations while remaining an integer.

Authors: The manuscript establishes through the topological structure of the superposed field that generic infinitesimal perturbations splitting coalescent singularities change the effective winding contributions to the skyrmion-number integral. The body of the work includes limiting-case analyses for representative perturbations and relies on continuity arguments for generality. In response to the comment, we have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that presents a more general limiting-case analysis, explicitly showing that the integral changes from ℓ2 − ℓ1 to max(ℓ2, ℓ1) for a broad class of perturbations while remaining quantized. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; central claim is an independent topological assertion

full rationale

The paper asserts that an arbitrarily small perturbation alters the skyrmion number from ℓ2−ℓ1 to max(ℓ2,ℓ1) by splitting coalescent singularities. No load-bearing equation, definition, or self-citation in the provided text reduces this claim to a tautology or to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The abstract and skeptic summary contain no self-definitional loops, no uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work; the result is framed as a new consequence of perturbation analysis rather than a re-labeling of known inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; assessment limited to stated claims.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 953 out tokens · 31352 ms · 2026-05-10T13:10:12.193495+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

T. B. Singh, Introduction to Topology (Springer Singa- pore, 2019)

work page 2019
[2]

R. L. Ricca and X. Liu, eds., Knotted Fields, Lec- ture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 2344 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

work page 2024
[3]

H. Wang, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological spin defects of light, Optica9, 1417 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

A. J. Vernon, A. J. Vernon, M. R. Dennis, M. R. Dennis, and F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, 3D zeros in electromagnetic fields, Optica, Vol. 10, Issue 9, pp. 1231-124010, 1231 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

M. R. Dennis, Topological singularities in wave fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol (2001)

work page 2001
[6]

M. R. Dennis and K. Y. Bliokh, Wave vortices 50 years on, Newton (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

M. V. Berry, Phase singularities in isotropic random waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences456, 2059 (2000)

work page 2059
[8]

M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, Polarization singulari- ties in isotropic random vector waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences457, 141 (2001)

work page 2001
[9]

M. R. Dennis, Local phase structure of wave dislocation lines: twist and twirl, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics6, S202 (2004)

work page 2004
[10]

O. V. Angelsky, I. I. Mokhun, A. Y. Bekshaev, C. Y. Zenkova, and J. Zheng, Polarization singularities: Topo- logical and dynamical aspects, Frontiers in Physics11, 1147788 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

O’holleran, M

K. O’holleran, M. R. Dennis, and M. J. Padgett, Topol- ogy of light’s darkness, Physical Review Letters102, 143902 (2009)

work page 2009
[12]

M. R. Dennis, R. P. King, B. Jack, K. O’holleran, and M. J. Padgett, Isolated optical vortex knots, Nature Physics6, 118 (2010)

work page 2010
[13]

M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, Knotted and linked phase singularities in monochromatic waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineer- ing Sciences457, 2251 (2001)

work page 2001
[14]

Sugic, R

D. Sugic, R. Droop, E. Otte, D. Ehrmanntraut, F. Nori, J. Ruostekoski, C. Denz, and M. R. Dennis, Particle- like topologies in light, Nature communications12, 6785 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

Z. Ye, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold, J. B. G¨ otte, A. McWilliam, F. C. Speirits, and C. M. Cisowski, The- ory of paraxial optical skyrmions, Proceedings of the Royal Society A480, 20240109 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

H. Wu, N. Mata-Cervera, H. Wang, Z. Zhu, C. Qiu, and Y. Shen, Photonic Torons with 3D Topology Transitions and Tunable Spin Monopoles, Physical Review Letters 135, 63802 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

W. Lin, N. Mata-Cervera, Y. Ota, Y. Shen, and S. Iwamoto, Space-time optical Hopfion crystals, Phys- ical Review Letters , – (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

A. N. Bogdanov and C. Panagopoulos, Physical founda- tions and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Reviews Physics2, 492 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Y. Shen, Q. Zhang, P. Shi, L. Du, X. Yuan, and A. V. Zayats, Optical skyrmions and other topological quasi- particles of light, Nature Photonics18, 15 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

H. B. Braun, Topological effects in nanomagnetism: From superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons, Advances in Physics61, 1 (2012)

work page 2012
[22]

A. M. Beckley, T. G. Brown, and M. A. Alonso, Full poincar´ e beams, Optics express18, 10777 (2010)

work page 2010
[23]

S. Gao, F. C. Speirits, F. Castellucci, S. Franke-Arnold, S. M. Barnett, and J. B. G¨ otte, Paraxial skyrmionic beams, Physical Review A102, 53513 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

A. A. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Ma, Y. Cai, R. Zhang, X. Shang, Y. Zhang, J. Qin, Z. K. Pong, T. Marozs´ ak, B. Chen, H. He, L. Luo, M. J. Booth, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, and C. He, Topological protection of optical skyrmions through complex media, Light: Science & Applications 2024 13:113, 314 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

L. Wang, S. Liu, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Li, and G. Guo, The robustness of skyrmion numbers of structured opti- cal fields in atmospheric turbulence, Optics Communica- tions579, 131568 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

Z. Guo, C. Peters, N. Mata-Cervera, A. N. Vetlugin, R. Guo, P. Zhang, A. Forbes, and Y. Shen, Topological robustness of classical and quantum optical skyrmions in atmospheric turbulence, Nature Communications17, 2085 (2026)

work page 2085
[27]

Gbur and R

G. Gbur and R. K. Tyson, Vortex beam propagation through atmospheric turbulence and topological charge conservation, JOSA A, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 225-23025, 225 (2008)

work page 2008
[28]

Cheng, J

W. Cheng, J. W. Haus, and Q. Zhan, Propagation of vec- tor vortex beams through a turbulent atmosphere, Op- tics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 20, pp. 17829-1783617, 17829 (2009)

work page 2009
[29]

J. A. Anguita, M. A. Neifeld, and B. V. Vasic, Turbulence-induced channel crosstalk in an orbital angu- lar momentum-multiplexed free-space optical link, Ap- plied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 13, pp. 2414-242947, 2414 (2008)

work page 2008
[30]

M. A. Alonso, D. Marco, I. Herrera, S. Vo, S. Bras- selet, and R. Guti´ errez-Cuevas, Covering spheres and hyperspheres: skyrmionic-like optical fields, in Complex Light and Optical Forces XX, Vol. PC13921, edited by D. L. Andrews, E. J. Galvez, and 6 H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop (SPIE, 2026)

work page 2026
[31]

C. M. Spaegele, M. Tamagnone, S. W. D. Lim, M. Os- siander, M. L. Meretska, and F. Capasso, Topologi- cally protected optical polarization singularities in four- dimensional space, Science Advances9, 10.1126/SCI- ADV.ADH0369 (2023)

work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2023
[32]

J. F. Nye, Unfolding of higher-order wave dislocations, JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 1132-113815, 1132 (1998)

work page 1998
[33]

Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi` ere II.: Nouvelles ´ etudes sur la diffraction.–Th´ eorie de la dispersion de Helmholtz

H. Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi` ere II.: Nouvelles ´ etudes sur la diffraction.–Th´ eorie de la dispersion de Helmholtz. Le¸ cons profess´ ees pendant le premier (G. Carr´ e, 1889)

work page
[34]

Maxwell and M

K. Maxwell and M. R. Dennis, Stochastic Stokes origami: folds, cusps and skyrmionic facets in random polarisation fields, Journal of Optics27, 045605 (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

M. A. Alonso, Geometric descriptions for the polarization of nonparaxial light: a tutorial, Advances in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 176-23515, 176 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

W. m. Goldman, Complex Hyperbolic Geometry (Ox- ford University Press, 1999)

work page 1999
[37]

McWilliam, C

A. McWilliam, C. M. Cisowski, Z. Ye, F. C. Speirits, J. B. G¨ otte, S. M. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, Topo- logical approach of characterizing optical skyrmions and multi-skyrmions, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2300155 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

J. Wang, X. Zeng, K. Ren, Z. Ye, C. M. Cisowski, Y. Chen, X. Yang, C. Wang, H. Gao, and S. Franke- Arnold, Generation of ring-shaped optical skyrmion with a high topological number, Applied Physics Letters126 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

Y. Shen, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Free-space topological optical textures: tutorial, Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics17, 295 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

M. R. Dennis, Rows of optical vortices from elliptically perturbing a high-order beam, Optics Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 9, pp. 1325-132731, 1325 (2006)

work page 2006
[41]

Freund, Saddles, singularities, and extrema in random phase fields, Physical Review E52, 2348 (1995)

I. Freund, Saddles, singularities, and extrema in random phase fields, Physical Review E52, 2348 (1995)

work page 1995
[42]

J. C. Guti´ errez-Vega, R. I. Hernandez-Aranda, C. L´ opez- Mariscal, and B. Perez-Garcia, On-demand tailored vec- tor beams, Applied Optics, Vol. 56, Issue 24, pp. 6967- 697256, 6967 (2017)

work page 2017
[43]

Born and E

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light, sixth ed. (1980)

work page 1980
[44]

M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: Ac- tive contour models, International Journal of Computer Vision1, 321 (1988)

work page 1988
[45]

Mata-Cervera, D

N. Mata-Cervera, D. K. Sharma, Y. Shen, R. Paniagua- Dominguez, and M. A. Porras, Skyrmionic Polarization Texture around the Phase Singularity of Optical Vortices, Physical Review Letters135, 033805 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

Annenkova, A

E. Annenkova, A. Afanasev, and E. Brasselet, Universal nondiffractive topological spin textures in vortex cores of light and sound, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02964 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[1] [1]

T. B. Singh, Introduction to Topology (Springer Singa- pore, 2019)

work page 2019

[2] [2]

R. L. Ricca and X. Liu, eds., Knotted Fields, Lec- ture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 2344 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

work page 2024

[3] [3]

H. Wang, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological spin defects of light, Optica9, 1417 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

A. J. Vernon, A. J. Vernon, M. R. Dennis, M. R. Dennis, and F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, 3D zeros in electromagnetic fields, Optica, Vol. 10, Issue 9, pp. 1231-124010, 1231 (2023)

work page 2023

[5] [5]

M. R. Dennis, Topological singularities in wave fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol (2001)

work page 2001

[6] [6]

M. R. Dennis and K. Y. Bliokh, Wave vortices 50 years on, Newton (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

M. V. Berry, Phase singularities in isotropic random waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences456, 2059 (2000)

work page 2059

[8] [8]

M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, Polarization singulari- ties in isotropic random vector waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences457, 141 (2001)

work page 2001

[9] [9]

M. R. Dennis, Local phase structure of wave dislocation lines: twist and twirl, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics6, S202 (2004)

work page 2004

[10] [10]

O. V. Angelsky, I. I. Mokhun, A. Y. Bekshaev, C. Y. Zenkova, and J. Zheng, Polarization singularities: Topo- logical and dynamical aspects, Frontiers in Physics11, 1147788 (2023)

work page 2023

[11] [11]

O’holleran, M

K. O’holleran, M. R. Dennis, and M. J. Padgett, Topol- ogy of light’s darkness, Physical Review Letters102, 143902 (2009)

work page 2009

[12] [12]

M. R. Dennis, R. P. King, B. Jack, K. O’holleran, and M. J. Padgett, Isolated optical vortex knots, Nature Physics6, 118 (2010)

work page 2010

[13] [13]

M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, Knotted and linked phase singularities in monochromatic waves, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineer- ing Sciences457, 2251 (2001)

work page 2001

[14] [14]

Sugic, R

D. Sugic, R. Droop, E. Otte, D. Ehrmanntraut, F. Nori, J. Ruostekoski, C. Denz, and M. R. Dennis, Particle- like topologies in light, Nature communications12, 6785 (2021)

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Z. Ye, S. M. Barnett, S. Franke-Arnold, J. B. G¨ otte, A. McWilliam, F. C. Speirits, and C. M. Cisowski, The- ory of paraxial optical skyrmions, Proceedings of the Royal Society A480, 20240109 (2024)

work page 2024

[16] [16]

H. Wu, N. Mata-Cervera, H. Wang, Z. Zhu, C. Qiu, and Y. Shen, Photonic Torons with 3D Topology Transitions and Tunable Spin Monopoles, Physical Review Letters 135, 63802 (2025)

work page 2025

[17] [17]

W. Lin, N. Mata-Cervera, Y. Ota, Y. Shen, and S. Iwamoto, Space-time optical Hopfion crystals, Phys- ical Review Letters , – (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

A. N. Bogdanov and C. Panagopoulos, Physical founda- tions and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Reviews Physics2, 492 (2020)

work page 2020

[19] [19]

B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

work page 2022

[20] [20]

Y. Shen, Q. Zhang, P. Shi, L. Du, X. Yuan, and A. V. Zayats, Optical skyrmions and other topological quasi- particles of light, Nature Photonics18, 15 (2024)

work page 2024

[21] [21]

H. B. Braun, Topological effects in nanomagnetism: From superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons, Advances in Physics61, 1 (2012)

work page 2012

[22] [22]

A. M. Beckley, T. G. Brown, and M. A. Alonso, Full poincar´ e beams, Optics express18, 10777 (2010)

work page 2010

[23] [23]

S. Gao, F. C. Speirits, F. Castellucci, S. Franke-Arnold, S. M. Barnett, and J. B. G¨ otte, Paraxial skyrmionic beams, Physical Review A102, 53513 (2020)

work page 2020

[24] [24]

A. A. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Ma, Y. Cai, R. Zhang, X. Shang, Y. Zhang, J. Qin, Z. K. Pong, T. Marozs´ ak, B. Chen, H. He, L. Luo, M. J. Booth, S. J. Elston, S. M. Morris, and C. He, Topological protection of optical skyrmions through complex media, Light: Science & Applications 2024 13:113, 314 (2024)

work page 2024

[25] [25]

L. Wang, S. Liu, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, C. Li, and G. Guo, The robustness of skyrmion numbers of structured opti- cal fields in atmospheric turbulence, Optics Communica- tions579, 131568 (2025)

work page 2025

[26] [26]

Z. Guo, C. Peters, N. Mata-Cervera, A. N. Vetlugin, R. Guo, P. Zhang, A. Forbes, and Y. Shen, Topological robustness of classical and quantum optical skyrmions in atmospheric turbulence, Nature Communications17, 2085 (2026)

work page 2085

[27] [27]

Gbur and R

G. Gbur and R. K. Tyson, Vortex beam propagation through atmospheric turbulence and topological charge conservation, JOSA A, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 225-23025, 225 (2008)

work page 2008

[28] [28]

Cheng, J

W. Cheng, J. W. Haus, and Q. Zhan, Propagation of vec- tor vortex beams through a turbulent atmosphere, Op- tics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 20, pp. 17829-1783617, 17829 (2009)

work page 2009

[29] [29]

J. A. Anguita, M. A. Neifeld, and B. V. Vasic, Turbulence-induced channel crosstalk in an orbital angu- lar momentum-multiplexed free-space optical link, Ap- plied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 13, pp. 2414-242947, 2414 (2008)

work page 2008

[30] [30]

M. A. Alonso, D. Marco, I. Herrera, S. Vo, S. Bras- selet, and R. Guti´ errez-Cuevas, Covering spheres and hyperspheres: skyrmionic-like optical fields, in Complex Light and Optical Forces XX, Vol. PC13921, edited by D. L. Andrews, E. J. Galvez, and 6 H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop (SPIE, 2026)

work page 2026

[31] [31]

C. M. Spaegele, M. Tamagnone, S. W. D. Lim, M. Os- siander, M. L. Meretska, and F. Capasso, Topologi- cally protected optical polarization singularities in four- dimensional space, Science Advances9, 10.1126/SCI- ADV.ADH0369 (2023)

work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2023

[32] [32]

J. F. Nye, Unfolding of higher-order wave dislocations, JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 5, pp. 1132-113815, 1132 (1998)

work page 1998

[33] [33]

Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi` ere II.: Nouvelles ´ etudes sur la diffraction.–Th´ eorie de la dispersion de Helmholtz

H. Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi` ere II.: Nouvelles ´ etudes sur la diffraction.–Th´ eorie de la dispersion de Helmholtz. Le¸ cons profess´ ees pendant le premier (G. Carr´ e, 1889)

work page

[34] [34]

Maxwell and M

K. Maxwell and M. R. Dennis, Stochastic Stokes origami: folds, cusps and skyrmionic facets in random polarisation fields, Journal of Optics27, 045605 (2025)

work page 2025

[35] [35]

M. A. Alonso, Geometric descriptions for the polarization of nonparaxial light: a tutorial, Advances in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 176-23515, 176 (2023)

work page 2023

[36] [36]

W. m. Goldman, Complex Hyperbolic Geometry (Ox- ford University Press, 1999)

work page 1999

[37] [37]

McWilliam, C

A. McWilliam, C. M. Cisowski, Z. Ye, F. C. Speirits, J. B. G¨ otte, S. M. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, Topo- logical approach of characterizing optical skyrmions and multi-skyrmions, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2300155 (2023)

work page 2023

[38] [38]

J. Wang, X. Zeng, K. Ren, Z. Ye, C. M. Cisowski, Y. Chen, X. Yang, C. Wang, H. Gao, and S. Franke- Arnold, Generation of ring-shaped optical skyrmion with a high topological number, Applied Physics Letters126 (2025)

work page 2025

[39] [39]

Y. Shen, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Free-space topological optical textures: tutorial, Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics17, 295 (2025)

work page 2025

[40] [40]

M. R. Dennis, Rows of optical vortices from elliptically perturbing a high-order beam, Optics Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 9, pp. 1325-132731, 1325 (2006)

work page 2006

[41] [41]

Freund, Saddles, singularities, and extrema in random phase fields, Physical Review E52, 2348 (1995)

I. Freund, Saddles, singularities, and extrema in random phase fields, Physical Review E52, 2348 (1995)

work page 1995

[42] [42]

J. C. Guti´ errez-Vega, R. I. Hernandez-Aranda, C. L´ opez- Mariscal, and B. Perez-Garcia, On-demand tailored vec- tor beams, Applied Optics, Vol. 56, Issue 24, pp. 6967- 697256, 6967 (2017)

work page 2017

[43] [43]

Born and E

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light, sixth ed. (1980)

work page 1980

[44] [44]

M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: Ac- tive contour models, International Journal of Computer Vision1, 321 (1988)

work page 1988

[45] [45]

Mata-Cervera, D

N. Mata-Cervera, D. K. Sharma, Y. Shen, R. Paniagua- Dominguez, and M. A. Porras, Skyrmionic Polarization Texture around the Phase Singularity of Optical Vortices, Physical Review Letters135, 033805 (2025)

work page 2025

[46] [46]

Annenkova, A

E. Annenkova, A. Afanasev, and E. Brasselet, Universal nondiffractive topological spin textures in vortex cores of light and sound, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02964 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025