arxiv: 2604.13926 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Importance of Aggregated DER Installed Capacity in Distribution Networks

Alexandre M. V. Gouveia , Md. Umar Hashmi , Reinhilde D'hulst , Dirk Van Hertem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY

keywords DERdistribution networksaggregationinstalled capacitylow-voltageobservabilitysubstation measurements

0 comments

The pith

Aggregated DER capacity estimated at LV points from substation data improves network awareness without customer monitoring.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that distribution system operators need better knowledge of total distributed energy resource capacity connected downstream of low-voltage substations. Rising numbers of solar panels, electric vehicles, and heat pumps alter power flows, yet operators face incomplete topology data, limited monitoring, and privacy barriers to customer-level information. The central proposal is that estimates of aggregated installed capacity at LV aggregation points can be derived from standard substation and feeder measurements already available to operators. Such aggregates would directly support DER-aware forecasting, congestion management, flexibility assessment, hosting capacity calculations, and tracking of adoption trends. A sympathetic reader would see this as a pragmatic bridge between current data gaps and the operational needs of grids with high DER penetration.

Core claim

This paper presents aggregated DER installed capacity, estimated at LV aggregation points, as a practical and scalable approach to improving DER awareness without requiring customer-level monitoring. We define the problem of estimating DER installed capacities from commonly available substation and feeder measurements. By linking these estimates to operational and planning needs, we discuss how knowledge of aggregated DER installed capacity enhances DER-aware forecasting, congestion management, flexibility quantification, hosting capacity assessment, and monitoring of DER adoption.

What carries the argument

Estimation of total DER installed capacity at LV aggregation points from substation and feeder measurements.

If this is right

Supports DER-aware forecasting of power flows at LV substations.
Improves real-time congestion management by accounting for aggregate DER output.
Enables quantification of available flexibility from downstream resources.
Facilitates hosting capacity assessments for new DER connections.
Allows ongoing monitoring of DER adoption trends without individual customer data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Such estimates could be integrated into existing SCADA systems to provide operators with actionable aggregates immediately.
The approach might reduce reliance on full smart-meter deployments by focusing monitoring effort at aggregation points.
Validation could involve controlled tests where known DER capacities are added or removed and the estimates are checked for responsiveness.

Load-bearing premise

Substation and feeder measurements contain sufficient information to produce usable estimates of total installed DER capacity at aggregation points.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison in a real LV network where the measurement-based capacity estimates deviate substantially from verified total installed DER capacities obtained from customer registries or detailed surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13926 by Alexandre M. V. Gouveia, Dirk Van Hertem, Md. Umar Hashmi, Reinhilde D'hulst.

read the original abstract

The increasing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), particularly electric vehicles, heat pumps, and photovoltaic systems, is fundamentally changing power flows in Low-Voltage (LV) distribution networks. Despite this transition, Distribution System Operators (DSOs) often lack reliable and up-to-date knowledge of the DER capacity connected downstream of LV substations. Limited observability, incomplete topology information, and restricted access to customer-level data make it difficult to maintain accurate DER registries, creating uncertainty in both operational and planning processes. This paper presents aggregated DER installed capacity, estimated at LV aggregation points, as a practical and scalable approach to improving DER awareness without requiring customer-level monitoring. We define the problem of estimating DER installed capacities from commonly available substation and feeder measurements. By linking these estimates to operational and planning needs, we discuss how knowledge of aggregated DER installed capacity enhances DER-aware forecasting, congestion management, flexibility quantification, hosting capacity assessment, and monitoring of DER adoption.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines the problem of estimating aggregated DER capacity from substation measurements and links it to DSO use cases, but supplies no estimator, observability analysis, or validation to show the estimates would actually work.

read the letter

The central message is that DSOs need a scalable way to track total DER installed capacity at LV aggregation points without customer-level data, and the authors position estimates derived from common feeder and substation measurements as the practical route. They spell out the inverse problem and map the estimates onto forecasting, congestion management, flexibility assessment, hosting capacity studies, and adoption tracking. That mapping is the clearest part of the work and shows they have thought through where the numbers would matter in operations. The barriers they list—limited observability, incomplete topology, and restricted customer access—are real and familiar to anyone working on distribution networks with rising PV, EVs, and heat pumps. Credit for keeping the discussion tied to those concrete needs rather than abstract theory. The main gap is that the paper never moves past the problem statement. No estimator is proposed, no conditions for identifiability or observability are derived, and there is no test against measurement noise, topology uncertainty, or heterogeneous DER behavior. Without at least a basic method and some error quantification, the claim that these estimates would be “usable” for the listed applications stays unexamined. The assumption that substation data contain enough information is asserted but not checked. This reads as a problem-definition piece aimed at distribution planners and researchers focused on DER integration and grid observability. A reader hunting for new algorithms or reproducible results will come away empty. It could serve as background reading for a group discussion on data gaps, but it does not yet contain enough technical substance to justify peer review. I would recommend the authors add an actual estimation approach and at least preliminary validation before resubmitting.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that estimating aggregated DER installed capacity at LV aggregation points from commonly available substation and feeder measurements offers a practical, scalable alternative to customer-level monitoring for improving DER awareness. It defines the inverse estimation problem and enumerates downstream benefits for DER-aware forecasting, congestion management, flexibility quantification, hosting capacity assessment, and monitoring of DER adoption, while noting challenges like limited observability and incomplete topology information.

Significance. If the central assumption holds—that substation and feeder measurements contain sufficient information for usable aggregated capacity estimates—this could provide DSOs with a low-cost path to better DER visibility without privacy barriers or full customer data access. The enumerated operational links are relevant to current distribution planning needs under rising DER penetration, but the manuscript supplies no supporting derivation, estimator, or accuracy assessment, so the significance remains prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)

The manuscript defines the estimation problem and lists operational uses but provides neither a concrete estimator, observability analysis, nor any quantitative evaluation of accuracy, bias, or identifiability under realistic conditions (measurement noise, topology uncertainty, DER heterogeneity). This leaves the core claim that the estimates are 'usable' and 'practical' untested; see Abstract and the discussion of linking estimates to needs.
No validation, simulation results, or error bounds are presented to show that aggregated capacity can be recovered with sufficient precision for the listed applications (e.g., congestion management or hosting capacity). Without such evidence, the assumption that available measurements suffice cannot be assessed as load-bearing for the claimed benefits.

minor comments (2)

Notation for aggregation points and measurement types could be formalized earlier (e.g., with a diagram or equations) to clarify the inverse problem setup.
The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the paper's scope (conceptual framework vs. algorithmic contribution) to set reader expectations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. The manuscript is a conceptual contribution that defines the inverse estimation problem for aggregated DER installed capacity at LV aggregation points and links it to operational needs. We respond point-by-point below and will make targeted revisions to address the concerns while preserving the paper's scope.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The manuscript defines the estimation problem and lists operational uses but provides neither a concrete estimator, observability analysis, nor any quantitative evaluation of accuracy, bias, or identifiability under realistic conditions (measurement noise, topology uncertainty, DER heterogeneity). This leaves the core claim that the estimates are 'usable' and 'practical' untested; see Abstract and the discussion of linking estimates to needs.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not present a specific estimator, observability analysis, or quantitative evaluation, as its focus is on problem definition and establishing the relevance of aggregated capacity estimates to DSO applications. This framing is intended to highlight a scalable, privacy-preserving alternative to customer-level monitoring. To strengthen the claims, we will revise the abstract for clarity on scope and add a dedicated section outlining a basic inverse problem formulation, qualitative observability considerations under common assumptions (e.g., partial topology knowledge), and high-level identifiability discussion. This will better ground the 'usable' and 'practical' assertions without overclaiming numerical performance. revision: partial
Referee: No validation, simulation results, or error bounds are presented to show that aggregated capacity can be recovered with sufficient precision for the listed applications (e.g., congestion management or hosting capacity). Without such evidence, the assumption that available measurements suffice cannot be assessed as load-bearing for the claimed benefits.

Authors: The referee is correct that no validation, simulations, or explicit error bounds are included. The paper's contribution lies in enumerating the downstream benefits and the measurement sources that could enable such estimation, rather than demonstrating recovery precision. We will add a new subsection that maps required precision levels to each application (e.g., tighter bounds for congestion management than for adoption monitoring) and references analogous inverse problems in distribution systems to indicate feasibility. This provides context for the assumption that substation/feeder measurements contain usable information, while clearly stating that full numerical validation is left for follow-on work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation or fitted model present; purely conceptual problem definition

full rationale

The manuscript defines the inverse problem of estimating aggregated DER installed capacity from substation and feeder measurements and enumerates downstream operational uses (forecasting, congestion management, hosting capacity). It supplies neither equations, estimators, validation, nor any quantitative analysis of identifiability or accuracy. With no mathematical chain, no predictions, and no self-citations invoked to justify a result, there is no load-bearing step that can reduce to its inputs by construction. The central claim remains a motivation for future estimation work rather than a derived result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 941 out tokens · 16424 ms · 2026-05-10T12:34:45.710345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references

[1]

On the integration of electric vehicles into german distribution grids through smart charging,

A. Heider, K. Helfenbein, B. Schachler, T. Röpcke, and G. Hug, “On the integration of electric vehicles into german distribution grids through smart charging,”IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 2001–2010, 2024

2001
[2]

Observ- ability of low voltage grids: Actual dsos challenges and research questions,

R.Sanchez,F.Iov,M.Kemal,M.Stefan,andR.Olsen,“Observ- ability of low voltage grids: Actual dsos challenges and research questions,” in2017 52nd International Universities Power Engi- neering Conference (UPEC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[3]

Lessons learnt from real-time monitoring of thelowvoltagedistributionnetwork,

A. Barbatoet al., “Lessons learnt from real-time monitoring of thelowvoltagedistributionnetwork,”SustainableEnergy,Grids and Networks, vol. 15, pp. 76–85, 2018

2018
[4]

Understanding interconnection rulenon-compliance: Lessonsfromsouthafrica’ssurgeinunau- thorised distributed energy resources,

J. A. Dippenaar and B. Bekker, “Understanding interconnection rulenon-compliance: Lessonsfromsouthafrica’ssurgeinunau- thorised distributed energy resources,”Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 85, p. 101661, 2025

2025
[5]

AnOverviewofDistributedEnergyResource (DER) Interconnection: Current Practices and Emerging Solu- tions,

K.Horowitzetal.,“AnOverviewofDistributedEnergyResource (DER) Interconnection: Current Practices and Emerging Solu- tions,”NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory(NREL),Golden, CO, USA, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-72102, 2019

2019
[6]

Controllability, visibility, forecasting and modelling strategies to increase distributed energy resources integration in Ireland,

M.Hickey,C.deBrito,P.S.Alves,F.O’Donnell,andA.Ahmadi, “Controllability, visibility, forecasting and modelling strategies to increase distributed energy resources integration in Ireland,” in28th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2025), vol. 2025. IET, 2025, pp. 1037– 1041

2025
[7]

Non-intrusive load monitoring: A review,

P. A. Schirmer and I. Mporas, “Non-intrusive load monitoring: A review,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 769–784, 2023

2023
[8]

Net load disaggregation at secondary substation level,

M. Toro-Cárdenas, I. Moreira, H. Morais, P. M. Carvalho, and L. A. Ferreira, “Net load disaggregation at secondary substation level,”Renewable Energy, vol. 207, pp. 765–771, 2023

2023
[9]

Modelingofheatpumpsload profiles for power systems integration,

A.Ayad,S.Wong,andV.Delisle,“Modelingofheatpumpsload profiles for power systems integration,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 238, p. 111059, 2025

2025
[10]

Installed PV Capacity Detection on LV Substations: Compari- son of Data-Driven and Model-Based Methods,

A.M.V.Gouveia,M.U.Hashmi,R.D’hulst,andD.VanHertem, “Installed PV Capacity Detection on LV Substations: Compari- son of Data-Driven and Model-Based Methods,” 2026, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5717615

2026
[11]

Data-driven photovoltaic installed capacity detection at low voltage substation level,

A.M.V.Gouveia,R.D’hulst,M.U.Hashmi,andD.VanHertem, “Data-driven photovoltaic installed capacity detection at low voltage substation level,” in14th Mediterranean Conference on Power Generation Transmission, Distribution and Energy Con- version (MEDPOWER 2024), 2024, pp. 678–683

2024
[12]

Powerfactorsignatureanalysisfordisaggregationofevcharging loads from aggregated power,

M.L.Nunes,J.F.P.Fernandes,J.Oliveira,andP.J.CostaBranco, “Powerfactorsignatureanalysisfordisaggregationofevcharging loads from aggregated power,” inCIRED Porto Workshop 2022: E-mobility and power distribution systems, vol. 2022, 2022, pp. 23–27

2022
[13]

Distributed energy resources electric profile identification in low voltage networks using supervised machinelearningtechniques,

A. F. M. Jaramilloet al., “Distributed energy resources electric profile identification in low voltage networks using supervised machinelearningtechniques,”IEEEAccess,vol.11,pp.19469– 19486, 2023

2023
[14]

Real-time estimation of aggregated electric vehi- cle charging load based on representative meter data,

Y. Huoet al., “Real-time estimation of aggregated electric vehi- cle charging load based on representative meter data,”Energy, vol. 321, p. 135162, 2025

2025
[15]

A deep learning framework for net load forecasting with unsupervised behind- the-meterdisaggregateddata,

C. Thepprom, N. Nupairoj, and P. Vateekul, “A deep learning framework for net load forecasting with unsupervised behind- the-meterdisaggregateddata,”IEEEAccess,vol.12,pp.94958– 94971, 2024

2024
[16]

Net load forecast- ing with disaggregated behind-the-meter pv generation,

A. Stratman, T. Hong, M. Yi, and D. Zhao, “Net load forecast- ing with disaggregated behind-the-meter pv generation,”IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 5341– 5351, 2023

2023
[17]

Estimating aggregate capacity of connected ders and forecast- ingfeederpowerflowwithlimiteddataavailability,

A. R. Nikzad, A. A. Mohamed, B. Venkatesh, and J. Penaranda, “Estimating aggregate capacity of connected ders and forecast- ingfeederpowerflowwithlimiteddataavailability,”IEEEOpen AccessJournalofPowerandEnergy,vol.11,pp.266–279,2024

2024
[18]

Dataport,

Pecan Street Inc., “Dataport,” https://www.pecanstreet.org/, 2021

2021
[19]

A study of congestion manage- mentinsmartdistributionnetworksbasedondemandflexibility,

T. H. Vo, A. N. M. M. Haque, P. H. Nguyen, I. G. Kamphuis, M. Eijgelaar, and I. Bouwman, “A study of congestion manage- mentinsmartdistributionnetworksbasedondemandflexibility,” in2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, 2017, pp. 1–6

2017
[20]

Quantifying the impact of load forecasting accuracy on congestion management in distribution grids,

M.Bernecker,M.Gebhardt,S.B.Amor,M.Wolter,andF.Müs- gens, “Quantifying the impact of load forecasting accuracy on congestion management in distribution grids,”International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 168, p. 110713, 2025

2025
[21]

Comprehensive congestion management for distribution net- works based on dynamic tariff, reconfiguration, and re-profiling product,

F. Shen, S. Huang, Q. Wu, S. Repo, Y. Xu, and J. Østergaard, “Comprehensive congestion management for distribution net- works based on dynamic tariff, reconfiguration, and re-profiling product,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4795–4805, 2018

2018
[22]

Market-based congestion management in electric power systems with exploitation of aggregators,

M. Pantoš, “Market-based congestion management in electric power systems with exploitation of aggregators,”International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 121, p. 106101, 2020

2020
[23]

Flexibility envelopes for power sys- tem operational planning,

H. Nosair and F. Bouffard, “Flexibility envelopes for power sys- tem operational planning,”IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 800–809, 2015

2015
[24]

Analyzing operational flexibility of electric power systems,

A. Ulbig and G. Andersson, “Analyzing operational flexibility of electric power systems,”International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 72, pp. 155–164, 2015, the Spe- cial Issue for 18th Power Systems Computation Conference

2015
[25]

Baseline methods for distributed flexibility in power sys- tems considering resource, market, and product characteristics,

L. Lind, J. P. Chaves-Ávila, O. Valarezo, A. Sanjab, and L. Ol- mos, “Baseline methods for distributed flexibility in power sys- tems considering resource, market, and product characteristics,” Utilities Policy, vol. 86, p. 101688, 2024

2024
[26]

Aggrega- tion and disaggregation of energetic flexibility from distributed energy resources,

F. L. Müller, J. Szabó, O. Sundström, and J. Lygeros, “Aggrega- tion and disaggregation of energetic flexibility from distributed energy resources,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1205–1214, 2019

2019
[27]

Flexibilityquantificationofelectricvehicle,heatpump,andpho- tovoltaicgenerationconsideringprocess,comfortconstraints,and grid needs,

L.Heulens,M.U.Hashmi,A.M.V.Gouveia,andD.VanHertem, “Flexibilityquantificationofelectricvehicle,heatpump,andpho- tovoltaicgenerationconsideringprocess,comfortconstraints,and grid needs,” 2026, unpublished manuscript

2026
[28]

Transmission and distribution coordination in power systems with high shares of distributed energy re- sources providing balancing and congestion management ser- vices,

L. Lind, R. Cossent, J. P. Chaves-Ávila, and T. Gómez San Román, “Transmission and distribution coordination in power systems with high shares of distributed energy re- sources providing balancing and congestion management ser- vices,”WIREs Energy and Environment, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e357, 2019

2019
[29]

Der hosting capacity for distribution networks: definitions, attributes, use-cases and challenges,

M. U. Hashmi, “Der hosting capacity for distribution networks: definitions, attributes, use-cases and challenges,” inIET Confer- ence Proceedings CP922, vol. 2025, no. 14. IET, 2025, pp. 541–546. 5

2025
[30]

Areviewofhosting capacity quantification methods for photovoltaics in low-voltage distribution grids,

E.Mulenga,M.H.Bollen,andN.Etherden,“Areviewofhosting capacity quantification methods for photovoltaics in low-voltage distribution grids,”International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 115, p. 105445, 2020

2020
[31]

Theenergyinjusticeof householdsolarenergy: Asystematicreviewofdistributionaldis- parities in residential rooftop solar adoption,

G.Konzen,R.Best,andN.J.deCastro,“Theenergyinjusticeof householdsolarenergy: Asystematicreviewofdistributionaldis- parities in residential rooftop solar adoption,”Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 111, p. 103473, 2024

2024
[32]

The justice and equity impli- cations of the clean energy transition,

S. Carley and D. M. Konisky, “The justice and equity impli- cations of the clean energy transition,”Nat Energy, vol. 5, pp. 569—-577, 2020. 6

2020