pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14890 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🧮 math.AG

Degenerations of generalized Kummer varieties

Lars H. Halle , Klaus Hulek , Ziyu Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords degenerationsgeneralized Kummer varietiesHilbert schemeKulikov modelsdual complexabelian surfacesstratification
0
0 comments X

The pith

Closing the relative generalized Kummer variety inside a compactified Hilbert scheme produces explicit degenerations of these varieties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a construction for degenerating families of generalized Kummer varieties by taking the closure of the relative version inside a pre-existing compactification of the relative Hilbert scheme. The method begins with any simple degeneration of an abelian surface over a curve and produces a flat family over the full base curve whose general fiber is the desired generalized Kummer variety. For the surface case the resulting model is projective and of Kulikov type, and its dual complex is shown to be PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex. The authors also examine the natural stratification of the special fiber and note new geometric features that appear already when the dimension rises to three.

Core claim

We embed the relative generalized Kummer variety K^{n-1}_o as a closed subscheme of the relative Hilbert scheme and take its closure K^{n-1}_{Y/C} inside the compactification I^n_{Y/C} previously constructed for the Hilbert scheme. This closure supplies a canonical degeneration of the generalized Kummer family over the base curve C. When n equals 2 the model is a projective Kulikov degeneration of Kummer surfaces and the dual complex of its special fiber is PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex.

What carries the argument

The closure K^{n-1}_{Y/C} of the relative generalized Kummer variety inside the compactification I^n_{Y/C} of the relative Hilbert scheme.

If this is right

  • For n=2 the construction yields a projective Kulikov model of Kummer surfaces.
  • The dual complex of this model for n=2 is PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex.
  • The scheme K^{n-1}_{Y/C} carries a natural stratification whose geometry can be studied directly from the construction.
  • Already for n=3 the special fiber exhibits geometric features absent in the surface case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same closure technique could be tested on other moduli spaces that embed into Hilbert schemes of abelian varieties.
  • The PL-homeomorphism of the dual complex suggests that certain topological invariants of the degeneration are completely determined by the base curve.
  • Comparing the resulting special fibers with those obtained from other known degeneration methods might identify which properties are canonical.

Load-bearing premise

The existing compactification of the relative Hilbert scheme contains the relative generalized Kummer variety as a closed subscheme so that its closure remains flat over the base curve.

What would settle it

An explicit computation showing that the closure K^{n-1}_{Y/C} fails to be flat over C or that its generic fiber is not isomorphic to the generalized Kummer variety would falsify the construction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14890 by Klaus Hulek, Lars H. Halle, Ziyu Zhang.

Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Admissible line charts for n = b = 3 in Example 6.6 For the stratum to be admissible, it remains to determine the τi ’s for each fixed set of values (ε1, . . . , εn, k). They have to satisfy the condition τ1 + · · · + τn + k ≡ 0 (mod N), (6.6) where each τi is a residue class modulo N. Solutions certainly exists for each value of k. 6.2.3. Example of computation for n = 3. The following concrete example … view at source ↗
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Example of an admissible line chart of length 5 obtained from an admissible line chart of length 3 by shifting its starting point from (0, 0) to (2, 2) O y = 0 inadmissible with n = 3 O y = 2 admissible with n = 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_6_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: Example of an admissible line chart of length 5 obtained from an inadmissible line chart of length 3 by shifting its starting point from (0, 0) to (2, 2) segments of slope 1, then 0 ≤ q ≤ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_6_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.4. Figure 6.4: An example of line charts for the same stratum to the restriction on the initial vertex mentioned above. To simplify the later discussion, we introduce the following terminology. Definition 6.11. Line charts that represent the same strata are said to be equivalent. Indeed, as explained above, two line charts are equivalent if and only if one is obtained from the other by a vertical shift 2p units for any… view at source ↗
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5: Another example of line charts for the same stratum 6.3.3. Information contained in line charts. From the above construction, we have already seen that the information about the configuration of any stratum is contained in the corresponding line charts. Some information is straightforward; for example, • The level of expansion, denoted by b, is 1 smaller than the number of vertices in the line chart; • T… view at source ↗
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.6. Figure 6.6: Admissible subcharts for D(1, 2, 3) in Example 6.15 total 7 admissible line subcharts of L. These line subcharts, as well as their associated strata, are displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_6_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.7
Figure 6.7. Figure 6.7: Admissible subcharts for D(1, 2, −3) in Example 6.16 3 admissible line subcharts in this case. All these admissible line subcharts, as well as their associated strata, are displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_6_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.8
Figure 6.8. Figure 6.8: Smoothings of E(1, 2, 3, 4) in Example 6.21 with 2k = 2. By listing all its admissible line subcharts, we discover that the dual complex that corresponds to the above deepest stratum is a pyramid over a square (instead of a tetrahedron) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_6_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.9
Figure 6.9. Figure 6.9: Dual complexes in Example 6.25 In particular, we see that the convex polytope F(L ′ ) is intrinsic to L ′ up to affine equivalence. We can therefore define the dual complex of Kn−1 as ∆(Kn−1 ) = G L ∆K(L)/ ∼ . (6.10) Here L runs over the complete admissible line charts with n + 1 vertices, and ∼ is the equivalence relation that, if L ′ is a line subchart of both L1 and L2, identifies F(L ′ ) in ∆K(L1) an… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: exhibits how ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.10
Figure 6.10. Figure 6.10: Admissible line charts of type 1 in Proposition 6.29 O y = 2 C(1, 2, 2) O y = −2 C(−1, −2, −2) O y = 2 C(1, 1, 2) O y = −2 C(−1, −1, −2) O y = 0 C(−1, −1, 2) O y = 0 C(1, 1, −2) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_6_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.11
Figure 6.11. Figure 6.11: Admissible line charts of type 2 in Proposition 6.29 6.12. For example, here we use that A(0, 1, −1), A(0, 1, 1) and A(0, −1, −1) are equivalent (see Definition 6.11) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_6_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.12
Figure 6.12. Figure 6.12: Admissible line charts of type 3 in Proposition 6.29 O y = 2 B(1, 1, 1) O y = −2 B(−1, −1, −1) O y = 0 A(0, 0, 0) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_6_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.13
Figure 6.13. Figure 6.13: Admissible line charts of type 4 in Proposition 6.29 The contribution in this case can be computed similarly as for the previous type. For each of these line charts, two of the xi ’s have equal value, hence the values of the corresponding τi ’s are exchangeable. The number of choices of both of these τi ’s is N+1 2  , and the third τi is determined as a consequence of (6.6). Type 4. The dimension of st… view at source ↗
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.1. Figure 8.1: Local chart C (τ ) for pairwise distinct τi ’s (c) the edge of D±(x, y, z) opposite to the vertex A1(τ ) is labelled by C(x, y, z; ±1, ±2, ∓3) = C(x, y, z ∓ 1; ±1, ±2, ±3), which is also an edge of D±(x, y, z ∓ 1). The first two rules determine that the local chart around A1(τ ) can be viewed as a semi-disk, which splits into 6 sectors; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_8_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.2. Figure 8.2: Local chart C (τ ) for τi ’s taking two distinct values; thick edges are on the boundary of ∆(K2 Y/C) The first two rules determine that the local chart around A1(τ ) can be viewed as a sixth of a disk, which splits into 2 sectors; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_8_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.3
Figure 8.3. Figure 8.3: Local chart C (τ ) for τi ’s taking identical values; thick edges are on the boundary of ∆(K2 Y/C) We summarize the above discussion by the following result Proposition 8.4. The local chart C (τ ) around the vertex A1(τ ) can be one of the three forms, as shown in Figures 8.1, 8.2 or 8.3. Moreover, the thick edges in these figures exhibit the edges in C (τ ) that occur on the boundary of the dual complex… view at source ↗
Figure 8.4
Figure 8.4. Figure 8.4: Local chart C +(τ ) for pairwise distinct τi ’s (b2) when y = z, the 2-simplex D +(x, y, z) is the only one that contains the edge labelled by C(x, y, z; 1, 2, 2); (c) the edge of D+(x, y, z) opposite to the vertex B + 1 (τ ) is labelled by C(x, y, z; 1, 2, 3) = C(x, y, z + 1; 1, 2, −3), which is also an edge of D+(x, y, z + 1). By the rules (a1), (b1) and (c), also for the convenience later, we can view… view at source ↗
Figure 8.5
Figure 8.5. Figure 8.5: Local chart C +(τ ) for τi ’s taking two distinct values; thick edges are on the boundary of ∆(K2 Y/C). The first rule determines that the local chart around B + 1 (τ ) can be viewed as a sector of the above mentioned equilateral triangle; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_8_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.6
Figure 8.6. Figure 8.6: Local chart C +(τ ) for τi ’s taking identical values; thick edges are on the boundary of ∆(K2 Y/C). We summarize the above discussion by the following result Proposition 8.6. The local chart C +(τ ) around the vertex B + 1 (τ ) can be one of the three forms, as shown in Figures 8.4, 8.5 or 8.6. Moreover, the thick edges in these figures exhibit the edges in C +(τ ) that occur on the boundary of the dual… view at source ↗
Figure 8.7
Figure 8.7. Figure 8.7: Neighboring local charts of C (τ ) in Subsection 8.2.1. A1(x, y, y) B − 1 (x + 1, y, y) B + 1 B (x, y, y − 1) − 1 (x, y, y + 1) B + 1 (x − 1, y, y) A1(x + 1, y, y − 1) A1(x, y + 1, y − 1) A1(x − 1, y, y + 1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_8_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.8
Figure 8.8. Figure 8.8: Neighboring local charts of C (τ ) in Subsection 8.2.2. Termination. The algorithm terminates until no more local chart can be further attached to the existing partial dual complex. The above algorithm determines a connected component of the dual complex in a recursive manner [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_8_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.9
Figure 8.9. Figure 8.9: Neighboring local charts of C (τ ) in Subsection 8.2.3. 8.5.3. Construction of the dual complex. First of all, we give the reader an idea of the component of the dual complex constructed by the above algorithm. As an example, the following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_8_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.10
Figure 8.10. Figure 8.10: Centers of local charts in ∆(K2 Y/C) for large N 8.8, 8.9. This is a tedious but straightforward calculation, hence we omit the details. For the statement about the termination of the algorithm, we need to find out all local charts that lie on the boundary of ∆(K2 Y/C). For the center of any local chart A1(τ ) or B ± 1 (τ ) where τ = (τ1, τ2, τ3) described above, we can prove by induction that τ1 = τ2 i… view at source ↗
Figure 8.11
Figure 8.11. Figure 8.11: Example: dual complex ∆(K2 Y/C) for N = 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_8_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.12
Figure 8.12. Figure 8.12: Example: dual complex ∆(K2 Y/C) for N = 5 G[b] × G[n − b], where U(I)0 is a G[n − b]-torsor. We will use the notation A(x1, x2, x3), B(x1, x2, x3), etc., introduced in Section 6.1 for the strata K(b, m) of the Kummer locus. Like in the previous section, we leave out the triple τ = (τ1, τ2, τ3) from the notation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_8_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.13
Figure 8.13. Figure 8.13: Example: dual complex ∆(K2 Y/C) for N = 6 9.1.2. We represent by ◦ a point on an original component, and by • a point on an inserted component. We also need to specify the action of G[b] on inserted components. Let σ1, . . . , σb be coordinates for G[b]. Then the torus acts by ±σi on an inserted component, for some i. Lastly, we indicate by w and n whether a stratum is wide or narrow, respectively. 9.1.… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a method to construct explicit degenerations of higher-dimensional generalized Kummer varieties. We start with a simple degeneration $f: \mathcal Y \to C$ of abelian surfaces. Then $ \mathcal{Y} \setminus \mathcal{Y}_0$ is an abelian scheme over $C \setminus 0$ and we can form the relative generalized Kummer variety $K^{n-1}_{\circ} = \mathrm{Kum}^{n-1}(\mathcal{Y} \setminus \mathcal{Y}_0) \to C \setminus 0$. This is naturally a closed subscheme of the relative Hilbert scheme $\mathrm{Hilb}^{n}(\mathcal{Y} \setminus \mathcal{Y}_0) \to C \setminus 0$. In previous work (joint with Gulbrandsen) we had constructed a compactification $I^n_{\mathcal{Y}/C}$ over $C$ of the latter scheme. The closure $K^{n-1}_{\mathcal{Y}/C}$ of $K^{n-1}_{\circ}$ inside $I^n_{\mathcal{Y}/C}$ yields a canonical way to degenerate the family of generalized Kummer varieties, and is the degeneration we propose. This paper contains a detailed study of the geometry of the scheme $K^{n-1}_{\mathcal{Y}/C}$ and its natural stratification. For $n=2$ we obtain a projective Kulikov model of Kummer surfaces, whereas already for $n=3$ new phenomena occur. We study in detail the dual complex of $K^{2}_{\mathcal{Y}/C}$ and show that this is PL-homeomorphic to the standard $2$-simplex.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a construction for degenerations of generalized Kummer varieties associated to a degeneration of abelian surfaces. Starting from a degeneration f: Y -> C of abelian surfaces, it forms the relative generalized Kummer variety K^{n-1}_o over C minus 0, embeds it into the relative Hilbert scheme, and takes its closure K^{n-1}_{Y/C} inside the compactification I^n_{Y/C} from previous joint work with Gulbrandsen. The paper studies the geometry and stratification of this closure. For n=2, it yields a projective Kulikov model of Kummer surfaces, and the dual complex of K^2_{Y/C} is shown to be PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex. For n=3, new phenomena are noted.

Significance. If the proposed closure is indeed flat and the stratification is preserved as claimed, this work provides an explicit and canonical degeneration of generalized Kummer varieties, which are important in the study of hyperkähler manifolds and their moduli spaces. The result on the dual complex for n=2 gives a precise description of the degeneration, potentially facilitating calculations of Hodge numbers or other invariants in the limit. The detailed study of the stratification for higher n could lead to new insights into the geometry of these degenerations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and construction (prior to §3)] Abstract and construction (prior to §3): The definition of K^{n-1}_{Y/C} as the scheme-theoretic closure of K^{n-1}_o inside I^n_{Y/C} is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. The manuscript does not provide an explicit argument that this closure is flat over C or has the expected dimension, which is required to ensure it defines a proper degeneration family and that the induced stratification has no extraneous components or collapsed strata.
  2. [Dual complex computation (n=2 case)] Dual complex computation (n=2 case): The claim that the dual complex of K^2_{Y/C} is PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex relies on the stratification being exactly the one induced by the relative Kummer condition in the limit. No concrete verification (e.g., via local equations or a specific example) is given to rule out obstructions from the summation map failing to extend compatibly to the boundary of I^n_{Y/C}.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'new phenomena' for n=3 but provides no indication of what they are; adding one sentence would improve readability without lengthening the abstract.
  2. [Introduction] The notation I^n_{Y/C} and the precise reference to the prior joint work with Gulbrandsen should be introduced with a full citation on first use in the introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested clarifications and verifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and construction (prior to §3): The definition of K^{n-1}_{Y/C} as the scheme-theoretic closure of K^{n-1}_o inside I^n_{Y/C} is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. The manuscript does not provide an explicit argument that this closure is flat over C or has the expected dimension, which is required to ensure it defines a proper degeneration family and that the induced stratification has no extraneous components or collapsed strata.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit argument establishing flatness of K^{n-1}_{Y/C} over C and the expected dimension is necessary to support the subsequent claims about the degeneration and its stratification. Although the ambient space I^n_{Y/C} is known to be flat from our prior joint work, the current text does not detail how the scheme-theoretic closure inherits these properties. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated lemma (placed immediately after the definition of K^{n-1}_{Y/C}) that proves flatness and dimension by showing that the ideal sheaf of the relative Kummer condition extends without introducing extraneous components or dimension drop, using the universal properties of the Hilbert scheme compactification. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Dual complex computation (n=2 case): The claim that the dual complex of K^2_{Y/C} is PL-homeomorphic to the standard 2-simplex relies on the stratification being exactly the one induced by the relative Kummer condition in the limit. No concrete verification (e.g., via local equations or a specific example) is given to rule out obstructions from the summation map failing to extend compatibly to the boundary of I^n_{Y/C}.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the existing argument for the PL-homeomorphism, while based on the stratification induced by the extended summation map, would benefit from a concrete check ruling out possible obstructions at the boundary. In the revised version we will include an explicit local computation (in the section on the dual complex for n=2) that provides local equations around the relevant boundary strata and verifies that the summation map extends compatibly, thereby confirming that no extraneous strata arise and that the dual complex is indeed PL-homeomorphic to the 2-simplex. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; degeneration defined explicitly and geometric claims derived independently

full rationale

The paper explicitly defines K^{n-1}_{Y/C} as the scheme-theoretic closure of the relative generalized Kummer K^{n-1}_o inside the ambient compactification I^n_{Y/C} constructed in prior joint work. This is a direct construction, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by definition. The central results—the detailed geometry and stratification of K^{n-1}_{Y/C}, the projective Kulikov model for n=2, and the PL-homeomorphism of the dual complex of K^2_{Y/C} to the standard 2-simplex—are established through analysis internal to this paper. No load-bearing step equates a claimed prediction or theorem to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz from the same authors; the prior compactification supplies only the ambient space, while the new properties are proven separately without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the existence and properties of the compactification I^n_{Y/C} from earlier joint work; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The compactification I^n_{Y/C} of the relative Hilbert scheme exists and is suitable for taking closures of the relative generalized Kummer subscheme.
    Invoked when forming the closure K^{n-1}_{Y/C} inside I^n_{Y/C}.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5603 in / 1393 out tokens · 28240 ms · 2026-05-10T09:39:58.895611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bogomolov, L

    F. Bogomolov, L. H. Halle, F. Pazuki, and S. Tanimoto. Abelian Calabi-Yau threefolds: N\'eron models and rational points, Math. Res. Lett. 25, no. 2, 367--392 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Bosch, W

    S. Bosch, W. L\"u tkebohmert, and M. Raynaud. N\'eron models, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Springer-Verlag (21), x + 325 pp. (1990)

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    S. Bosch. Lectures on formal and rigid geometry, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2105. Cham: Springer, viii+254 pp. (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Brown and E

    M.V. Brown and E. Mazzon. The essential skeleton of a product of degenerations , Compos. Math. 155, no. 7, 1259--1300 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Chiarellotto and C

    B. Chiarellotto and C. Lazda. Combinatorial degenerations of surfaces and Calabi-Yau threefolds , Algebra Number Theory, 10, no. 10, 2235 -- 2266 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Deligne and D

    P. Deligne and D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus , Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., 36, 75--109 (1969)

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    de Fernex, J

    T. de Fernex, J. Koll\' a r and C. Xu. The dual complex of singularities , Higher dimensional algebraic geometry---in honour of P rofessor Y ujiro K awamata's sixtieth birthday , Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo , 74, pp. 103--129 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Faltings and C.-L

    G. Faltings and C.-L. Chai. Degeneration of Abelian varieties. Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb., Springer-Verlag (3), xii + 316 pp. (1990)

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , Wiley, New York, 1, 3rd ed., xviii+509 pp

    Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , Wiley, New York, 1, 3rd ed., xviii+509 pp. (1968)

    work page 1968

  10. [10]

    J. Fogarty. Algebraic families on an algebraic surface Amer. J. Math , 90, 511--521 (1968)

    work page 1968

  11. [11]

    M. G. Gulbrandsen, L. H. Halle, and K. Hulek. A GIT construction of degenerations of Hilbert schemes of points . Doc. Math. , 24, 421--472 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    M. G. Gulbrandsen, L. H. Halle, K. Hulek and Z. Zhang. The geometry of degenerations of Hilbert schemes of points. J. Algebraic Geom. 30, 1--56 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    L. H. Halle and J. Nicaise. The N\'eron component series of an abelian variety. Math. Ann. , 348, no. 3, 749--778 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    L. H. Halle and J. Nicaise. Motivic zeta functions of degenerating Calabi-Yau varieties. Math. Ann., 370, no. 3-4, 1277--1320 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Hartshorne

    R. Hartshorne. Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 52, Springer Verlag, New York -- Heidelberg, xvi+496 pp. (1977)

    work page 1977

  16. [16]

    Hochster and J.L

    M. Hochster and J.L. Roberts. Rings of invariants of reductive groups acting on regular rings are Cohen-Macaulay . Advances in Mathematics , 13 (2), 115--175 (1974)

    work page 1974

  17. [17]

    Koll \'a r, R

    J. Koll \'a r, R. Laza, G. Sacc \`a , and C. Voisin. Remarks on degenerations of hyper-K\"ahler manifolds , Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 68, no. 7, 2837--2882 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    K\"unnemann

    K. K\"unnemann. Projective regular models for abelian varieties, semistable reduction, and the height pairing . Duke Math. J. , 95, 161--212 (1998)

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    V. S. Kulikov Degenerations of \(K_3\) surfaces and Enriques surfaces . Math. USSR, Izv. , 11, 957--989 (1977)

    work page 1977

  20. [20]

    Liu and D

    Q. Liu and D. Lorenzini. Special fibers of N\'eron models and wild ramification. J. reine angew. Math. , 532, 179--222 (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Q. Liu. Algebraic geometry and arithmetic curves. Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 6 , Oxford University Press , xv + 577 pp. (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    J. Li. Stable morphisms to singular schemes and relative stable morphisms. J. Differential Geom. , 57, no. 3, 509--578 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    J. Li. Good degenerations of moduli spaces. Handbook of moduli. V ol. II , Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) 25, 299--351 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Mumford, J

    D. Mumford, J. Fogarty, F. Kirwan. Geometric invariant theory. Third edition. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (2) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (2)], 34, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , xiv+292 pp. (1994)

    work page 1994

  25. [25]

    Y. Nagai. On monodromies of a degeneration of irreducible symplectic K \"a hler manifolds . Math. Z. , 258, no. 2, 407--426 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Y. Nagai. Symmetric products of a semistable degeneration of surfaces . Math. Z. , 289, no. 3-4, 1143--1168 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Y. Nagai. Gulbrandsen–Halle–Hulek degeneration and Hilbert-Chow morphism . Pure Appl. Math. Q. , 17, no. 1, 401--422 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Overkamp

    O. Overkamp. Degenerations of Kummer surfaces . Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. , 171, no. 1, 65--97 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Persson, H

    U. Persson, H. Pinkham. Degeneration of surfaces with trivial canonical bundle . Ann. Math. (2) ,113, 45--66 (1981)

    work page 1981

  30. [30]

    From logarithmic Hilbert schemes to degenerations of hyperk\” ahler varieties.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.21190, 2025

    Q. Shafi, C. Tschanz. From logarithmic Hilbert schemes to degenerations of hyperkähler varieties . arXiv:2512.21190

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Stacks Project

    The Stacks Project Authors. Stacks Project . https://stacks.math.columbia.edu (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    C. Tschanz. Good models of Hilbert schemes of points over semistable degenerations . arXiv:2402.10209

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    C. Tschanz. Expansions for Hilbert schemes of points on semistable degenerations . Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , 14, e53 (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    G. M. Ziegler. Lectures on polytopes . Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 152, Springer Verlag, New York, x+370 pp. (1995)

    work page 1995