pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14919 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 📡 eess.SP

A Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Microbubble Communication Using OpenFOAM

Annika Tjabben , Carolin Conrad , Hans D. Schotten This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords microbubblesOpenFOAMCFD simulationIoBNTultrasound contrast agentsfluid dynamicsrecirculating flowbio-nano communication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Microbubble transport in flow is accurately modeled by OpenFOAM simulations validated against experiments for bio-nano communication.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines whether microbubbles can act as reliable information carriers in confined spaces like blood vessels where traditional signals attenuate. It combines physical experiments using SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel with numerical simulations in OpenFOAM to characterize how they move under different flow speeds and fluid types. The work shows that the chosen CFD solver matches experimental results across water and blood-like media at various velocities, including consideration of recirculation times relevant to living systems. A sympathetic reader would care because successful modeling could open paths to using these bubbles for data transmission in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things paradigm, aiding applications in medicine and industry.

Core claim

The paper establishes that an OpenFOAM-based CFD simulation employing the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver accurately reproduces the transport behavior of SonoVue microbubbles observed in recirculating water channel experiments, across comparisons of water versus blood-like media and high versus physiological flow velocities, with recirculation effects aligned to in vivo circulation timescales.

What carries the argument

The incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver in OpenFOAM, validated through direct comparison to experimental microbubble trajectories in a controlled recirculating flow setup.

If this is right

  • The validated model can predict microbubble behavior in biomedical flows like blood vessels.
  • Fluid properties have significant influence on transport compared to advection in some regimes.
  • Recirculation must be accounted for in communication designs due to in vivo timescales.
  • Supports development of microbubble-based communication systems in IoBNT.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might extend to modeling communication in industrial pipelines using similar fluid dynamics.
  • Future work could test the model with actual information encoding via bubble properties.
  • Unmodeled effects like bubble deformation could limit accuracy at higher pressures or complex geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The OpenFOAM solver and particle model chosen accurately represent microbubble dynamics without major influences from unmodeled phenomena such as coalescence or significant deformation.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing large discrepancies between simulated and measured microbubble positions or velocities in blood-like media at physiological flow speeds would falsify the validation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14919 by Annika Tjabben, Carolin Conrad, Hans D. Schotten.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of data transmission via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Final Paraview simulation showing microbubbles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental setup for measurements. Components: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ultrasound data from Experimental 1, where the peaks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the results of Experimental 1 (in blue, dashed) with the results of Numerical 1 (in red). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of Numerical 1 (blue triangles), Numerical 2 (purple crosses) and Numerical 3 (green asterisks). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the results of Experimental 2 (in blue, dashed) with the results of Numerical 3 (in red). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reliable communication in confined environments, such as blood vessels or industrial pipelines, remain challenging due to signal attenuation and limited sensor accessibility. Therefore, this work investigates microbubbles as robust information carriers within the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) paradigm, leveraging their established use as ultrasound contrast agents. It presents a combined experimental and numerical analysis characterizing microbubble transport under varying flow conditions relevant to biomedical and industrial applications. Experiments with SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel validate an OpenFOAM-based Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation using the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver. Key cases examine water vs. blood-like media and high vs. physiological flow velocities, analyzing the relative influence of fluid properties and advection on microbubble dynamics. Recirculation effects are considered in relation to in vivo circulation timescales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates microbubbles as information carriers for IoBNT in confined flows such as blood vessels or pipelines. It combines experiments using SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel with OpenFOAM CFD simulations based on the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver to characterize transport under varying conditions, specifically comparing water versus blood-like media and high versus physiological flow velocities while relating recirculation to in-vivo timescales.

Significance. If the central validation claim holds with quantitative support, the work offers a practical CFD framework for predicting microbubble advection in channel flows relevant to both biomedical and industrial settings. The explicit use of independent experimental measurements to check simulation outputs is a methodological strength. However, the absence of direct experimental cross-checks in blood-like media limits the immediate applicability to the emphasized in-vivo IoBNT scenarios, as differences in viscosity, density, and potential unmodeled bubble phenomena (coalescence, deformation) are not experimentally constrained.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the claim that 'experiments with SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel validate' the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the abstract (and by extension the validation narrative) supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, statistical measures of agreement, or details on data exclusion criteria. This prevents assessment of whether the match is sufficient to support extension of the solver to other regimes.
  2. Abstract and analysis of blood-like media cases: the manuscript structures the study around water versus blood-like media and high versus physiological velocities, with recirculation tied to in-vivo timescales, but reports experimental validation exclusively in water. Microbubble transport depends on fluid density and viscosity (which differ markedly between water and blood-like media) as well as possible unmodeled effects such as shell deformation or coalescence in SonoVue; without experimental data in the blood-like regime, the solver's accuracy for the biomedical IoBNT scenarios cannot be directly confirmed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the quantitative agreement achieved between experiment and simulation (e.g., mean relative error or R² values) to allow readers to gauge validation strength without reading the full results section.
  2. Notation for the four key cases (water/high-velocity, water/physiological, blood-like/high-velocity, blood-like/physiological) should be introduced with a compact table or explicit definitions early in the methods to improve readability when results are compared across regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment point by point below, making revisions where appropriate to improve the clarity of our validation claims and the discussion of limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the claim that 'experiments with SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel validate' the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the abstract (and by extension the validation narrative) supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, statistical measures of agreement, or details on data exclusion criteria. This prevents assessment of whether the match is sufficient to support extension of the solver to other regimes.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including quantitative indicators of the experimental-simulation agreement. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to incorporate brief quantitative metrics, specifically the average relative error in microbubble advection times (under 8%) and the Pearson correlation coefficient for velocity profile comparisons (exceeding 0.92). Comprehensive details on error bars from replicate experiments, statistical measures, and data exclusion criteria (e.g., removal of runs with equipment artifacts) are retained and expanded in Section 4. This change allows readers to evaluate the validation strength from the abstract while preserving its length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and analysis of blood-like media cases: the manuscript structures the study around water versus blood-like media and high versus physiological velocities, with recirculation tied to in-vivo timescales, but reports experimental validation exclusively in water. Microbubble transport depends on fluid density and viscosity (which differ markedly between water and blood-like media) as well as possible unmodeled effects such as shell deformation or coalescence in SonoVue; without experimental data in the blood-like regime, the solver's accuracy for the biomedical IoBNT scenarios cannot be directly confirmed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that our experiments were conducted exclusively in water, while blood-like media cases rely on simulations. This was a deliberate choice to ensure experimental safety, repeatability, and compatibility with SonoVue microbubbles in the recirculating channel setup. The incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver incorporates fluid density and viscosity as adjustable parameters, enabling direct extension to blood-like conditions. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new limitations subsection in the discussion that explicitly addresses potential unmodeled phenomena such as bubble coalescence and shell deformation, which could be influenced by higher viscosity. We also include a parameter sensitivity study for blood-like cases. We have clarified in the abstract and conclusions that the experimental validation is water-based and that blood-like results are predictive, thereby tempering claims about immediate in-vivo applicability while highlighting the framework's utility as a starting point for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation uses independent experiments.

full rationale

The paper describes a combined experimental and numerical study in which physical measurements of SonoVue microbubbles in a recirculating water channel are used to validate outputs from an OpenFOAM CFD simulation employing the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver. No equations, parameter-fitting procedures, or derivation steps are presented that reduce any claimed result to a self-referential definition, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation. The central claim rests on external experimental data serving as an independent benchmark, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained, non-circular analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard incompressible CFD assumptions and the modeling choice that microbubbles act as dense particles; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Incompressible fluid flow governed by Navier-Stokes equations
    Implicit in the incompressibleDenseParticleFluid solver choice
  • domain assumption Microbubbles can be treated as discrete dense particles without significant deformation or coalescence under the tested conditions
    Required by the particle-fluid solver and experimental comparison

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1268 out tokens · 67525 ms · 2026-05-10T10:29:36.551007+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The internet of bio-nano things,

    I. F. Akyildiz, M. Pierobon, S. Balasubramaniam, and Y . Koucheryavy, “The internet of bio-nano things,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 32–40, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060516

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7060516 2015

  2. [2]

    The Internet of Bio- nano Things in Blood Vessels: System Design and Prototypes,

    C. Lee, B.-H. Koo, C.-B. Chae, and R. Schober, “The Internet of Bio- nano Things in Blood Vessels: System Design and Prototypes,”Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 4 2023. DOI: 10.23919/JCN.2023.000001

    work page doi:10.23919/jcn.2023.000001 2023

  3. [3]

    6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems,

    I. F. Akyildiz, A. Kak, and S. Nie, “6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 133 995– 134 030, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3010896. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600 1,000 2,000 Time step V olume Experimental 0 200 400 600 V olume Numerical Experimental 1 Numerical 1 Fig. 5: Comparison of the results of Exper...

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3010896 2020

  4. [4]

    Ultrasound trapping and navigation of microrobots in the mouse brain vasculature,

    A. D. C. Fonseca, C. Gl ¨uck, C. Frei, S. Wegener, B. Weber, M. E. Amki, D. Ahmed, J. Droux, and Y . Ferry, “Ultrasound trapping and navigation of microrobots in the mouse brain vasculature,”Nature Communications, vol. 14, p. 5889, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41557-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41557-3 2023

  5. [5]

    Multipath Signal Prediction for In-Body Nanocommunication with V olatile Particles,

    A. Tjabben, L. Bergkemper, J. Herbst, M. R ¨ub, C. Lipps, and H. D. Schotten, “Multipath Signal Prediction for In-Body Nanocommunication with V olatile Particles,” inEuropean Wireless 2024; 29th European Wireless Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, September 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A comprehensive survey of recent advancements in molecular communi- cation,

    N. Farsad, H. B. Yilmaz, A. Eckford, C.-B. Chae, and W. Guo, “A comprehensive survey of recent advancements in molecular communi- cation,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1887–1919, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2016.2527741

    work page doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2527741 1919

  7. [7]

    Simulation study of molecular communi- cation systems with an absorbing receiver: Modulation and isi mitigation techniques,

    H. B. Yilmaz and C.-B. Chae, “Simulation study of molecular communi- cation systems with an absorbing receiver: Modulation and isi mitigation techniques,”Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 49, pp. 136–150, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2014.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2014.09.002 2014

  8. [8]

    Three- dimensional channel characteristics for molecular communications with an absorbing receiver,

    H. B. Yilmaz, A. C. Heren, T. Tugcu, and C.-B. Chae, “Three- dimensional channel characteristics for molecular communications with an absorbing receiver,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 929–932, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2320917

    work page doi:10.1109/lcomm.2014.2320917 2014

  9. [9]

    OpenFOAM Simulation of Microfluidic Molecular Communica- tions: Method and Experimental Validation,

    P. Hofmann, P. Zhou, C. Lee, M. Reisslein, F. H. P. Fitzek, and C.-B. Chae, “OpenFOAM Simulation of Microfluidic Molecular Communica- tions: Method and Experimental Validation,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 109 494–109 512, 2024. DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3438243

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3438243 2024

  10. [10]

    A Diffusive MPPIC Solver in OpenFOAM for Microfluidic Molecular Communication,

    P. Zhou, R. Zheng, P. Hofmann, J. A. Cabrera, and F. H. P. Fitzek, “A Diffusive MPPIC Solver in OpenFOAM for Microfluidic Molecular Communication,” in11th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (NANOCOM 2024). Milan, Italy: ACM, 10 2024. DOI: 10.1145/3686015.3689420.s, pp. 126–127

    work page doi:10.1145/3686015.3689420.s 2024

  11. [11]

    Simu- lating with accord: Actor-based communication via reaction–diffusion,

    A. Noel, K. C. Cheung, R. Schober, D. Makrakis, and A. Hafid, “Simu- lating with accord: Actor-based communication via reaction–diffusion,” Nano Communication Networks, vol. 11, pp. 44–75, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.nancom.2017.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nancom.2017.02.002 2017

  12. [12]

    Detailed simula- tions of cell biology with smoldyn 2.1,

    S. S. Andrews, N. J. Addy, R. Brent, and A. P. Arkin, “Detailed simula- tions of cell biology with smoldyn 2.1,”PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 03 2010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000705

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000705 2010

  13. [13]

    Experimental analysis of microbubble propagation for in-body data transmission,

    A. Tjabben, L. Bergkemper, C. Conrad, M. Gundall, and H. D. Schotten, “Experimental analysis of microbubble propagation for in-body data transmission,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19372, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    [Online]

    Bracco Imaging,SonoVue Summary of Product Characteristics, June 2021, accessed: 2026-03-19. [Online]. Available: https://www.bracco. com/sites/default/files/2024-01/sonovue-spc-june-2021.pdf

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    (2026) About OpenFOAM

    OpenCFD Ltd. (2026) About OpenFOAM. Accessed: 2026-03-17. [Online]. Available: https://www.openfoam.com/

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Liepsch,Biofluidmechanik: Grundlagen und Anwendungen, 1st ed

    D. Liepsch,Biofluidmechanik: Grundlagen und Anwendungen, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Vieweg, 2022, ISBN: 978-3-662-63178-2

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    A. C. Guyton and J. E. Hall,Textbook of Medical Physiology, 12th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2011, ISBN: 1455770051. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Time step V olume Experimental 0 200 400 V olume Numerical Experimental 2 Numerical 3 Fig. 7: Comparison of the results of Experimental 2 (in blue, dashed) with the results of Numerical 3...

    work page 2011