Adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso for High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Models

Fuzhi Xu; Qingzhao Zhang; Shuangge Ma; Weijuan Liang

arxiv: 2604.15070 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 📊 stat.ME

Adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso for High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Models

Fuzhi Xu , Weijuan Liang , Shuangge Ma , Qingzhao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ME

keywords multi-prior lassoadaptive regularizationhigh-dimensional GLMsprior informationvariable selectiongene expression dataTCGA data

0 comments

The pith

Adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso assigns data-driven weights to external priors to enhance high-dimensional generalized linear models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso to incorporate multiple external prior sources into high-dimensional generalized linear models while accounting for their varying reliability. It assigns adaptive weights so that more reliable priors receive higher emphasis and less reliable ones are downweighted. This selective integration aims to improve estimation accuracy, prediction, and variable selection over standard approaches that either ignore priors or treat them equally. The method comes with theoretical guarantees and is validated through simulations and an application to TCGA breast cancer gene expression data where priors from PubMed studies enhance performance.

Core claim

For high-dimensional generalized linear models, the adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso simultaneously identifies reliable prior sources and integrates them by assigning each an adaptive data-driven weight. More reliable sources are emphasized while less credible ones are downweighted. This leads to better model performance in terms of estimation, prediction, and variable selection, as shown in extensive simulations and real data analysis.

What carries the argument

The adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso regularization, which uses data-driven weights for each prior in the penalty term of the GLM objective.

If this is right

Improved performance in high-dimensional settings where external priors are available from multiple sources.
Theoretical guarantees ensure consistent estimation under the adaptive weighting scheme.
Practical benefits demonstrated in gene expression analysis for cancer data.
Potential for better variable selection by leveraging quality priors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the weight estimation is stable, this approach could generalize to other regularization techniques beyond lasso.
Applications might extend to domains with heterogeneous prior information, such as neuroimaging or environmental modeling.
Future work could explore robustness when prior sources have correlated errors.

Load-bearing premise

The reliability of each prior source can be accurately and stably estimated from the same high-dimensional data without substantial bias or circular dependence in the estimation process.

What would settle it

A dataset where prior sources have known and varying levels of reliability, but the method assigns high weights to unreliable priors and shows no improvement over non-adaptive integration or standard lasso.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15070 by Fuzhi Xu, Qingzhao Zhang, Shuangge Ma, Weijuan Liang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Schematic of prior information. X and B denote relevant variable sets and prior coefficient values, respectively. Blue = covariates; orange = relevant covariate names; green = coefficient values. Empty (uncolored) cells indicate covariates not marked as relevant by the prior. For example, X1 flags x2, x5, and x6; B1 assigns 0.2 and −0.5 to x2 and x3. Question marks in Bi ’s indicate missing prior informati… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Simulation results for linear regression under scenario [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Selection of tuning parameter η in linear regression with relevant variable set priors. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Incorporation of external information into high-dimensional modeling for gene expression data has been shown, both theoretically and empirically, to substantially enhance performance. Such external information, sometimes referred to as prior information or priors, has become increasingly accessible from multiple sources, yet its reliability may vary considerably. Existing approaches often integrate these priors without sufficiently accounting for their quality, which may result in unsatisfactory or even misleading results. To effectively and selectively exploit such priors, we propose adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso, a novel regularization approach that simultaneously identifies reliable prior sources and integrates them to improve model performance. For high-dimensional generalized linear models (GLMs), an adaptive data-driven weight is assigned to each prior, so that more reliable sources are emphasized while less credible ones are downweighted. Theoretical guarantees are established, and the proposed method is shown through extensive simulations to improve estimation, prediction, and variable selection. An application to TCGA breast cancer gene expression data further illustrates the practical value of the proposed method, showing that incorporating prior information from PubMed published studies improves model performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The adaptive multi-prior lasso gives a workable way to blend several external priors in high-dim GLMs, but the data-driven weights raise a real circularity issue that the theory must address explicitly.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is a lasso variant for high-dimensional GLMs that takes multiple external priors and assigns each an adaptive, data-driven weight so stronger sources dominate while weaker ones are downweighted. This is a direct response to the common situation in genomics where you have several noisy sources of prior information and want to use them selectively rather than pick one or average them naively. The simulations and the TCGA breast cancer application show gains in estimation, prediction, and variable selection when the priors are of uneven quality, which matches what practitioners actually face. That practical framing is the part that lands cleanly. The authors also claim theoretical guarantees, which is the right bar for this kind of regularization work. On the positive side, the method is simple enough to implement and the real-data example is relevant. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags. The weights are estimated from the same observations used to fit the model. In the p ≫ n regime this creates a dependence that can bias both the weights and the final estimates unless the proofs include an extra error term or uniform convergence argument that treats the weights as random. The abstract does not indicate whether that step is handled, so it is hard to know how tight the guarantees actually are. Minor implementation details like how the weight estimator is initialized or tuned could also matter in practice but are secondary. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a methods journal for statisticians who work with penalized GLMs and side information. A reader who needs to combine several priors will find the simulations and the TCGA example useful even if they end up modifying the weighting step. It is worth sending to peer review because the core problem is genuine and the proposed fix is concrete; a referee can check whether the theory closes the circularity gap and whether the simulation design is fair.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the adaptive Multi-Prior Lasso for high-dimensional generalized linear models. It assigns data-driven weights to each of multiple prior sources so that more reliable priors receive higher weight while less credible ones are downweighted, with the goal of improving estimation, prediction, and variable selection. Theoretical guarantees are claimed, supported by extensive simulations and an application to TCGA breast cancer gene expression data that incorporates priors derived from PubMed studies.

Significance. If the theoretical analysis properly controls the estimation error induced by the data-driven weights and the empirical gains are not artifacts of the simulation design, the method could provide a practical advance for incorporating heterogeneous external information in high-dimensional GLMs, especially in genomics applications where multiple prior sources of varying quality are common.

major comments (2)

Abstract: the claim of 'theoretical guarantees' is asserted without any indication of how the adaptive weights are estimated or whether their randomness is accounted for in the oracle inequalities or consistency rates. In the high-dimensional regime p ≫ n this is load-bearing, because the weights are functions of the same data used to obtain the final estimator; without an explicit error term or uniform convergence argument for the weights, the guarantees may not hold.
Abstract and introduction (implied by the description of the weighting step): the reliability of each prior is estimated from the identical observations used for the GLM fit. This creates a potential circular dependence that the abstract does not address; the manuscript must demonstrate either that the weight estimator is independent of the final fit (e.g., via sample splitting) or that the additional error is controlled at a rate compatible with the Lasso rate.

minor comments (1)

The abstract is concise but could briefly note the form of the adaptive weight (e.g., whether it is based on a discrepancy measure, cross-validation, or another criterion) to help readers assess the circularity risk immediately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below with clarifications drawn from the manuscript's theoretical analysis and indicate where revisions will be made to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the claim of 'theoretical guarantees' is asserted without any indication of how the adaptive weights are estimated or whether their randomness is accounted for in the oracle inequalities or consistency rates. In the high-dimensional regime p ≫ n this is load-bearing, because the weights are functions of the same data used to obtain the final estimator; without an explicit error term or uniform convergence argument for the weights, the guarantees may not hold.

Authors: The abstract is concise by design, but the full manuscript details the procedure. Section 3.2 defines the adaptive weights via a data-driven optimization that depends on the observations, and the main oracle inequality (Theorem 4.1) explicitly decomposes the estimation error to include a term bounding the deviation of the estimated weights from their population values. This term is controlled at a rate compatible with the high-dimensional Lasso rate using concentration inequalities under standard boundedness assumptions on the prior functions. We will revise the abstract to note that the randomness of the weights is accounted for in the stated guarantees. revision: yes
Referee: Abstract and introduction (implied by the description of the weighting step): the reliability of each prior is estimated from the identical observations used for the GLM fit. This creates a potential circular dependence that the abstract does not address; the manuscript must demonstrate either that the weight estimator is independent of the final fit (e.g., via sample splitting) or that the additional error is controlled at a rate compatible with the Lasso rate.

Authors: The analysis uses the full sample for both steps, but the theoretical results control the induced dependence without sample splitting. The proof of the main consistency result applies a Lipschitz condition on the weight mapping together with uniform empirical process bounds to show that the additional error from weight estimation is absorbed into the overall rate and does not degrade the Lasso-type guarantees. We will add an explicit statement of this error control to both the abstract and the introduction to address the circular-dependence concern directly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper proposes an adaptive multi-prior Lasso for high-dimensional GLMs that assigns data-driven weights to multiple prior sources. The provided abstract and context describe a joint regularization approach with claimed theoretical guarantees for estimation, prediction, and selection. No equations, self-citations, or derivation steps are exhibited that reduce the weight estimation to the final parameter estimates by construction, nor is there evidence of fitted inputs being relabeled as predictions or ansatzes smuggled via self-citation. The adaptivity is presented as a standard data-driven mechanism supported by theory, making the central claims self-contained against external benchmarks rather than circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on the assumption that prior reliability can be quantified data-drivenly; no explicit free parameters beyond the adaptive weights are described, and no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

adaptive prior weights
Data-driven weights assigned to each prior source to reflect estimated reliability; these are central to the method but their exact fitting procedure is not detailed in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Prior information from multiple sources has varying and estimable reliability that can be used to improve high-dimensional GLM estimation.
This assumption underpins the entire adaptive-weighting strategy and is invoked throughout the abstract's description of the method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1360 out tokens · 26687 ms · 2026-05-10T10:43:29.600400+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

3 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

Gene expression profile analysis to discover molecular signatures for early diagnosis and therapies of triple- negative breast cancer,

Alam, M. S., Sultana, A., Wang, G., and Haque Mollah, M. N. (2022), “Gene expression profile analysis to discover molecular signatures for early diagnosis and therapies of triple- negative breast cancer,” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences , 9, 1049741. Bergersen, L. C., Glad, I. K., and Lyng, H. (2011), “Weighted lasso with data integration,” Statistical...

work page 2022
[2]

Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality,

Fan, J., and Lv, J. (2011), “Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 57(8), 5467–5484. Gu, T., Taylor, J. M. G., and Mukherjee, B. (2023), “A synthetic data integration frame- work to leverage external summary-level information from heterogeneous populations,” Biometrics, 79(4), 3831–3845. Harris,...

work page 2011
[3]

Prognostic significance and tumor immune microenvironment heterogenicity of m5C RNA methy- 21 lation regulators in triple-negative breast cancer,

Huang, Z., Pan, J., Wang, H., Du, X., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., and Chen, D. (2021), “Prognostic significance and tumor immune microenvironment heterogenicity of m5C RNA methy- 21 lation regulators in triple-negative breast cancer,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental biology, 9, 657547. Jiang, Y., He, Y., and Zhang, H. (2016), “Variable Selection With Prior Info...

work page 2021

[1] [1]

Gene expression profile analysis to discover molecular signatures for early diagnosis and therapies of triple- negative breast cancer,

Alam, M. S., Sultana, A., Wang, G., and Haque Mollah, M. N. (2022), “Gene expression profile analysis to discover molecular signatures for early diagnosis and therapies of triple- negative breast cancer,” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences , 9, 1049741. Bergersen, L. C., Glad, I. K., and Lyng, H. (2011), “Weighted lasso with data integration,” Statistical...

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality,

Fan, J., and Lv, J. (2011), “Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 57(8), 5467–5484. Gu, T., Taylor, J. M. G., and Mukherjee, B. (2023), “A synthetic data integration frame- work to leverage external summary-level information from heterogeneous populations,” Biometrics, 79(4), 3831–3845. Harris,...

work page 2011

[3] [3]

Prognostic significance and tumor immune microenvironment heterogenicity of m5C RNA methy- 21 lation regulators in triple-negative breast cancer,

Huang, Z., Pan, J., Wang, H., Du, X., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., and Chen, D. (2021), “Prognostic significance and tumor immune microenvironment heterogenicity of m5C RNA methy- 21 lation regulators in triple-negative breast cancer,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental biology, 9, 657547. Jiang, Y., He, Y., and Zhang, H. (2016), “Variable Selection With Prior Info...

work page 2021