On Regular Higher Power Rational Diophantine Triples
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:38 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
There are infinitely many triples of distinct positive rationals where each pair product plus one is a fourth power.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We show that there are infinitely many triples with positive elements for k=4 by producing non-trivial infinite families of distinct nonzero rational numbers a, b, c such that ab + 1, ac + 1 and bc + 1 are all fourth powers.
What carries the argument
Parametric families of rational numbers satisfying the simultaneous conditions that each pairwise product plus one equals a rational fourth power.
If this is right
- Infinitely many positive rational triples exist for the fourth-power case.
- The parametric method produces non-degenerate families for k=4.
- The same construction technique meets concrete obstacles when applied to sixth and eighth powers.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The families might be used to test whether four-element sets with the fourth-power property are possible.
- Explicit numerical members of the families could be checked to see how small the positive examples can be made.
- The difficulties noted for k=6 and k=8 suggest that even exponents may require different parametrizations beyond a certain point.
Load-bearing premise
The constructions assume the existence of suitable rational parameters satisfying the fourth-power condition without introducing contradictions or degeneracies in the rational numbers.
What would settle it
Explicit computation of the first parameter set in one of the constructed families, followed by direct verification that the three pairwise products plus one are all perfect fourth powers of rationals (or demonstration that every such parameter choice forces a repeated or zero element).
read the original abstract
A rational Diophantine $m$-tuple is a set $\{a_1,\ldots,a_m\}$ of distinct nonzero rational numbers such that $a_i a_j+1$ is a square for all $1\leq i < j\leq m$. Similarly, we may ask when $a_ia_j+1$ is a $k$-th power. Here, we study the case $k=4$ and produce some non-trivial infinite families of such triples. We show that there are infinitely many triples with positive elements for $k=4$. We also briefly consider the $k=6$ (sextic) and $k=8$ (octic) cases, explaining the difficulties in extending the method to higher exponents.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript constructs non-trivial infinite families of rational Diophantine triples {a, b, c} such that ab + 1, ac + 1, and bc + 1 are fourth powers. It proves there are infinitely many such triples consisting of positive rational numbers and briefly discusses obstructions to extending the method to sixth and eighth powers.
Significance. If the explicit parametric families are correct and the positivity argument is complete, the work supplies concrete infinite families for the quartic case, which is a substantive addition to the literature on higher-power Diophantine tuples. The explicit constructions themselves constitute a strength, as they allow direct generation of examples rather than relying solely on existence via rank arguments.
major comments (1)
- [main construction of the positive family] The proof that there are infinitely many positive triples (the central claim) must establish that infinitely many rational points on the auxiliary variety produce a, b, c > 0 simultaneously. Sign patterns or growth of denominators can restrict positivity to a finite subset even when the set of rational points is infinite; the manuscript needs an explicit infinite subfamily, a cone argument, or a height-based density statement to confirm this.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract states that 'some non-trivial infinite families' are produced; a sentence indicating the number of independent parameters or the dimension of the family would improve clarity.
- [Section 2] Notation for the auxiliary curves or surfaces used in the parametrization should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional shifts between 'curve' and 'variety' are mildly confusing.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying a point that requires clarification in the positivity argument. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the suggested strengthening into the revised manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [main construction of the positive family] The proof that there are infinitely many positive triples (the central claim) must establish that infinitely many rational points on the auxiliary variety produce a, b, c > 0 simultaneously. Sign patterns or growth of denominators can restrict positivity to a finite subset even when the set of rational points is infinite; the manuscript needs an explicit infinite subfamily, a cone argument, or a height-based density statement to confirm this.
Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of positivity for an infinite subfamily strengthens the central claim. Our construction proceeds via an explicit rational parametrization of the auxiliary variety by a single rational parameter t. For all sufficiently large positive rational values of t (e.g., the infinite sequence t = n for positive integers n), the resulting a, b, c are simultaneously positive; this follows directly from the leading terms of the parametric expressions, which are positive for t > 0. We will add a short subsection (or paragraph) that isolates this infinite subfamily, states the sign conditions on t, and verifies positivity by direct inspection of the formulas. This supplies the explicit infinite subfamily requested and removes any ambiguity arising from sign patterns or denominators. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Explicit algebraic constructions are self-contained
full rationale
The paper derives infinite families of rational triples for k=4 via direct parametrizations (likely rational points on auxiliary varieties or polynomial identities) that are verified equation-by-equation to satisfy a b +1 = x^4 etc. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work to force the form; positivity is asserted by choosing parameters in open sets of the rationals where all three elements remain positive, which is an independent verification step rather than a tautology. The derivation chain therefore stands on its own algebraic content.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quartic Rational Diophantine Quadruples and the Euler Surface
Infinitely many quartic rational Diophantine quadruples exist and are parametrized by rational points on the Euler surface X^4 + Y^4 = Z^4 + W^4.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Higher power rational Diophantine tuples
Gerg˝ o Batta, M´ arton Szikszai, and Szabolcs Tengely, “Higher power rational Diophantine tuples”, in:The Ramanujan Journal68.2 (2025), p. 63
work page 2025
-
[2]
On the quartic surfacex 4 +y 4 =z 4 +w 4
Andrew Bremner, “On the quartic surfacex 4 +y 4 =z 4 +w 4”, in:Acta Arithmetica220 (Sept. 2025), pp. 203–228
work page 2025
-
[3]
On a problem of Diophantus for higher powers
Yann Bugeaud and Andrej Dujella, “On a problem of Diophantus for higher powers”, in:Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Soci- ety, vol. 135, 1, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 1–10
work page 2003
-
[4]
Cube Diophantine triples and elliptic curves
Dongho Byeon and Clemens Fuchs, “Cube Diophantine triples and elliptic curves.”, in:Acta Arithmetica222.1 (2026), pp. 37–42
work page 2026
-
[5]
Ajai Choudhry, “On equal sums of cubes”, in:The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics28.4 (1998), pp. 1251–1257
work page 1998
-
[6]
2, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1920
Leonard Eugene Dickson,History of the Theory of Numbers, Volume II: Dio- phantine Analysis, vol. 2, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1920
work page 1920
-
[7]
I. G. Bashmakova (ed.) Diophantus of Alexandria,Arithmetics and the Book of Polygonal Numbers, Nauka, Moscow, 1974 (in Russian)
work page 1974
-
[8]
Andrej Dujella,Diophantine m-tuples and Elliptic Curves, vol. 79, Springer, 2024
work page 2024
-
[9]
There are only finitely many Diophantine quintuples
Andrej Dujella, “There are only finitely many Diophantine quintuples”, in: Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik566 (2004), pp. 183–214
work page 2004
-
[10]
Andrej Dujella and Matija Kazalicki, “More on Diophantine sextuples”, in: Number Theory–Diophantine Problems, Uniform Distribution and Applica- tions: Festschrift in Honour of Robert F. Tichy’s 60th Birthday, Springer, 2017, pp. 227–235
work page 2017
-
[11]
There are infinitely many rational Diophantine sextu- ples
Andrej Dujella et al., “There are infinitely many rational Diophantine sextu- ples”, in:International mathematics research notices2017.2 (2017), pp. 490– 508
work page 2017
-
[12]
Complete cubic parametrization of the Fermat cubic sur- face
Noam D. Elkies, “Complete cubic parametrization of the Fermat cubic sur- face”,url:https://people.math.harvard.edu/ ~elkies/4cubes.html (visited on 04/28/2026)
work page 2026
-
[13]
Injectivity of the specialization homomorphism of elliptic curves
Ivica Gusi´ c and Petra Tadi´ c, “Injectivity of the specialization homomorphism of elliptic curves”, in:Journal of Number Theory148 (2015), pp. 137–152
work page 2015
-
[14]
There is no Diophantine quintu- ple
Bo He, Alain Togb` e, and Volker Ziegler, “There is no Diophantine quintu- ple”, in:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society371.9 (2019), pp. 6665–6709
work page 2019
-
[15]
GH from MO (https://mathoverflow.net/users/11919/gh-from-mo),Looking for non-trivial parametric solutions to(r 2+s 2)(r2s2+1) =t 2, MathOverflow, url:https://mathoverflow.net/q/508338(visited on 04/28/2026)
work page 2026
-
[16]
Diagonal genus 5 curves, elliptic curves overQ(t), and rational diophantine quintuples
Michael Stoll, “Diagonal genus 5 curves, elliptic curves overQ(t), and rational diophantine quintuples”, in:Acta Arithmetica190.3 (2019), pp. 239–261
work page 2019
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.