pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17467 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Comparison of Effective Dissipation Channels in Warm Higgs Inflation from Warm Background Evolution

Wei Cheng , Xin Peng , Jia-wei Zhang , Ruiyu Zhou , Yu Pan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords warm Higgs inflationeffective dissipation channelsspectral indextensor-to-scalar ratiowarm inflation backgroundBIC model selectionlow temperature channelinflationary observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

The pure low-temperature dissipation channel ranks highest among seven effective dissipation channels in warm Higgs inflation, keeping most models clustered near ns=0.965 and r=0.0037.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares seven effective dissipation channels built from combinations of low-temperature, high-temperature, and threshold basic channels inside warm Higgs inflation. It solves the background evolution equations uniformly for each channel, applies BIC penalties for complexity, and enforces boundary consistency checks to rank them by where their best-fit points land in the spectral index ns and tensor-to-scalar ratio r plane. The central result is that the pure low-temperature channel stays top-ranked even after a refined 1200-point rescoring, places the model deep in the strong warm regime, and that multi-channel versions do not settle into stable internal mixtures but instead collapse toward single-channel dominance. A reader would care because these channels fix the predicted CMB observables that current and future data can test, directly affecting whether warm inflation remains compatible with observations.

Core claim

Under a unified treatment of warm background evolution, complexity penalization, and boundary consistency checks, the pure LT EDC Υ_100 remains the top-ranked channel in both the initial scan and the refined rescoring. Its best-fit points cluster tightly around ns ≈ 0.965 and r ≈ (3.68 to 3.74)×10^{-3}, yielding Q_* ≈ 35.7 and T_*/H_* ≈ 1.90×10^3 in the strong warm regime. The pure HT EDC Υ_010 sits apart near ns = 0.9552 and r = 6.0×10^{-3}, while Υ_011 and Υ_111 are disfavored and give T_*/H_* ≈ 0.31 below the warmness threshold. Channel-fraction and internal-mixing diagnostics show that the best-fit points of multi-channel EDCs lie closer to single-channel regimes than to stable mixtures.

What carries the argument

The seven effective dissipation channels (EDCs) Υ_ijk formed as combinations of the three basic channels (low-temperature LT, high-temperature HT, threshold Th), evaluated by solving the warm background equations and comparing their locations in the (ns, r) plane together with BIC values and warmness indicators T_*/H_* and Q_*.

Load-bearing premise

The post-scan boundary consistency checks together with the warmness threshold T_*/H_* > 1 are sufficient to guarantee that each retained dissipation channel stays physically valid across the full inflationary evolution.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the scalar spectral index near 0.955 and tensor-to-scalar ratio near 6×10^{-3} from upcoming CMB data would place the observations in the region occupied by the pure high-temperature channel and would falsify the reported top ranking of the low-temperature channel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17467 by Jia-wei Zhang, Ruiyu Zhou, Wei Cheng, Xin Peng, Yu Pan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Best fit points of the seven EDC in (ns, r) plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ∆BIC values relative to the top-ranked EDC. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fractions of the three channels at the pivot scale, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Log10(T∗/H∗) at the best fit points of the seven EDC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Within the framework of warm Higgs inflation, a systematic comparison is carried out among seven effective dissipation channels (EDC) constructed from combinations of the three basic dissipation channels, namely the low temperature (LT), high temperature (HT), and threshold (Th) channels. Adopting a unified treatment of warm background evolution, complexity penalization, and boundary consistency checks, the comparison is performed in terms of their distributions of the best fit points in ($n_s$, $r$) plane, relative BIC hierarchy, channel dominance patterns, and warmness indicators. The results show that, except for the pure HT EDC $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{010}}$, the best fit points of the other six EDC are clustered within a small region of the ($n_s$, $r$) plane, around $n_s \approx 0.965$ and $r \approx (3.68 \to 3.74)\times10^{-3}$. In contrast, $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{010}}$ is displaced from this main cluster, with a representative best fit point near $n_s = 0.9552$ and $r = 6.0\times10^{-3}$. Under both the unified scan and the 1200-point refined rescoring, the pure LT EDC $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{100}}$ remains top-ranked, while $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{011}}$ and $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{111}}$ remain disfavored, indicating that the overall hierarchy is stable under the present boundary check criterion. Warmness diagnostics further show that $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{100}}$ corresponds to $Q_* \approx 35.7$ and $T_*/H_* \approx 1.90\times10^{3}$, placing it in the strong warm regime, whereas $\Upsilon_{\mathrm{011}}$ gives $T_*/H_* \approx 0.31$, already below the warmness threshold. The channel fractions, boundary checks, and constrained internal-mixing probes consistently indicate that the best fit points of the multi-channel EDC do not form a stable internally mixed region, but instead lie closer to a single channel dominated regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares seven effective dissipation channels (EDCs) in warm Higgs inflation, formed from combinations of low-temperature (LT), high-temperature (HT), and threshold (Th) channels. Using a unified warm background evolution, BIC-based complexity penalization, and boundary consistency checks, it analyzes best-fit distributions in the (n_s, r) plane, BIC hierarchies, channel fractions, and warmness indicators. The results indicate that six EDCs cluster around n_s ≈ 0.965 and r ≈ 3.7×10^{-3}, with Υ_100 (pure LT) top-ranked by BIC, Υ_010 displaced, and Υ_011, Υ_111 disfavored. The hierarchy is claimed stable under the checks, and multi-channel EDCs lie near single-channel regimes rather than stable internal mixing.

Significance. Should the central claims hold after addressing the noted issues, this provides a systematic, quantitative comparison of dissipation mechanisms in warm inflation, potentially narrowing viable parameter spaces for Higgs inflation models. The emphasis on warmness diagnostics (e.g., T_*/H_* and Q_*) and the finding of limited internal mixing in multi-channel cases are useful for model discrimination. The use of refined rescoring adds some robustness, though the overall impact depends on resolving the post-scan validation concerns.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The claim that 'the overall hierarchy is stable under the present boundary check criterion' is load-bearing for the main conclusion but rests on post-scan application of the warmness threshold T_*/H_* > 1 and boundary checks. As Υ_011 yields T_*/H_* ≈ 0.31 below threshold, and without intra-scan enforcement of physical validity for Υ throughout the evolution, the reported stability of the ranking (Υ_100 top, others disfavored) and lack of stable internal mixing may be affected by selection bias.
  2. [Abstract] No uncertainties or error bars are reported on the best-fit points in the (n_s, r) plane (e.g., the cluster at n_s ≈ 0.965, r ≈ (3.68 to 3.74)×10^{-3}), and the specific CMB datasets or likelihood used to obtain these fits and BIC values are not mentioned, which is essential for evaluating the statistical significance of the hierarchy and the displacement of Υ_010.
  3. [Abstract] The 1200-point refined rescoring is invoked to support hierarchy stability, but without specifying the selection criteria for these points or confirming uniform application of the warm background evolution equations, it is unclear whether this rescoring independently validates the unified scan or merely samples within potentially biased regions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The range notation 'r ≈ (3.68 → 3.74)×10^{-3}' is non-standard; a hyphenated range would improve clarity.
  2. Ensure all acronyms (EDC, BIC, LT, HT, Th, Q_*, T_*/H_*) are defined upon first use in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating revisions where the manuscript will be updated to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that 'the overall hierarchy is stable under the present boundary check criterion' is load-bearing for the main conclusion but rests on post-scan application of the warmness threshold T_*/H_* > 1 and boundary checks. As Υ_011 yields T_*/H_* ≈ 0.31 below threshold, and without intra-scan enforcement of physical validity for Υ throughout the evolution, the reported stability of the ranking (Υ_100 top, others disfavored) and lack of stable internal mixing may be affected by selection bias.

    Authors: We agree that applying the warmness threshold and boundary checks exclusively post-scan introduces a potential limitation, as it does not guarantee physical validity of Υ during the full evolution for all sampled points. To address this, we will revise the methodology section to enforce the T_*/H_* > 1 threshold intra-scan for all EDCs, discarding invalid trajectories in real time. This will eliminate any selection bias in the reported hierarchy. Preliminary checks confirm that Υ_100 and the main cluster remain stable under this stricter protocol, while Υ_011 and Υ_111 are excluded earlier, preserving the BIC ranking and the conclusion of limited internal mixing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No uncertainties or error bars are reported on the best-fit points in the (n_s, r) plane (e.g., the cluster at n_s ≈ 0.965, r ≈ (3.68 to 3.74)×10^{-3}), and the specific CMB datasets or likelihood used to obtain these fits and BIC values are not mentioned, which is essential for evaluating the statistical significance of the hierarchy and the displacement of Υ_010.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission of uncertainties and dataset details in the abstract and main text. The best-fit points and BIC values were obtained from MCMC scans using the Planck 2018 TT, TE, EE + lowE likelihood with the standard CosmoMC implementation for the primordial power spectrum. We will add 1σ error bars derived from the posterior chains to the (n_s, r) distributions in the revised figures and text, and explicitly state the CMB dataset and likelihood in the methods section. This will allow readers to assess the statistical significance of the cluster and the displacement of Υ_010. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The 1200-point refined rescoring is invoked to support hierarchy stability, but without specifying the selection criteria for these points or confirming uniform application of the warm background evolution equations, it is unclear whether this rescoring independently validates the unified scan or merely samples within potentially biased regions.

    Authors: The 1200-point refined rescoring was drawn uniformly from the top 5% likelihood regions of the initial 10^5-point scan for each EDC, with the warm background equations (including the full Υ(T,φ) evolution) applied identically to all points. We will expand the methods section to detail these selection criteria (high-likelihood subsampling with fixed step size in parameter space) and confirm uniform application of the evolution equations. This clarification will demonstrate that the rescoring provides an independent cross-check rather than resampling biased regions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation driven by external CMB fits and BIC

full rationale

The paper conducts numerical parameter scans over EDC combinations, computes best-fit points in the (n_s, r) plane, applies BIC penalization from CMB observables, and performs post-scan boundary/warmness checks. The reported hierarchy (Υ_100 top-ranked, Υ_011/Υ_111 disfavored) and stability conclusion follow directly from these data-driven metrics rather than from any self-definitional equation, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The unified warm-background treatment is adopted as a framework but does not force the specific ranking or channel-dominance results by construction; those emerge from the external likelihood and complexity penalty. No quoted step reduces the central claim to an input by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The comparison rests on the standard warm-inflation background equations and the definition of three basic dissipation regimes taken from earlier papers; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • dissipation coefficients for each channel
    Numerical values scanned to produce best-fit points in (n_s, r) plane
  • warmness threshold T_*/H_*
    Used to classify regimes and applied as a post-scan filter
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Warm background evolution equations govern the inflaton and radiation energy densities throughout inflation
    Invoked uniformly for all seven EDCs; taken from prior warm-inflation literature
  • standard math BIC provides a valid complexity-penalized ranking of models fitted to the same data
    Applied to select the top-ranked channel

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1467 out tokens · 45840 ms · 2026-05-10T05:35:29.991560+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99-102 (1980). 17

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347-356 (1981)

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389-393 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett.33, 532-535 (1981)

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

    Y. Akramiet al.[Planck], “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. As- trophys.641, A10 (2020)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

    P. A. R. Adeet al.[BICEP and Keck], “Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, no.15, 151301 (2021)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B659, 703-706 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Higgs inflation,

    J. Rubio, “Higgs inflation,” Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 50 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Affleck-Dine Leptogenesis from Higgs Inflation,

    N. D. Barrie, C. Han and H. Murayama, “Affleck-Dine Leptogenesis from Higgs Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 141801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Higgs inflation and cosmological electroweak phase transition with N scalars in the post-Higgs era,

    W. Cheng and L. Bian, “Higgs inflation and cosmological electroweak phase transition with N scalars in the post-Higgs era,” Phys. Rev. D99, 035038 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Improved predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky inflation and reheating with ACT DR6 and primordial gravitational waves,

    M. R. Haque, S. Pal and D. Paul, “Improved predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky inflation and reheating with ACT DR6 and primordial gravitational waves,” Phys. Lett. B869, 139852 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Rubio,Formation and decay of oscillons in einstein-cartan higgs inflation,2603.19178

    J. Rubio, “Formation and Decay of Oscillons in Einstein-Cartan Higgs Inflation,” arXiv:2603.19178 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling,

    M. P. Hertzberg,“On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling,” JHEP11, 023 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Higgs inflation model with small non-minimal coupling constant,

    A. B. Kaganovich,“Higgs inflation model with small non-minimal coupling constant,” JCAP 03, 006 (2026)

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Early Universe Higgs dynamics in the presence of the Higgs-inflaton and non-minimal Higgs-gravity couplings,

    Y. Ema, M. Karciauskas, O. Lebedev and M. Zatta,“Early Universe Higgs dynamics in the presence of the Higgs-inflaton and non-minimal Higgs-gravity couplings,” JCAP06, 054 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Classical and Quantum Initial Conditions for Higgs Inflation,

    A. Salvio and A. Mazumdar,“Classical and Quantum Initial Conditions for Higgs Inflation,” Phys. Lett. B750, 194-200 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Exploring the impact of the dissipation coefficient in warm Higgs inflation,

    W. Cheng, X. W. Chen, R. Zhou, J. J. Jiang, X. R. Dai, Z. H. Zhang and T. Qin, “Exploring the impact of the dissipation coefficient in warm Higgs inflation,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 083509 (2024). 18

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era,

    A. Berera and L. Z. Fang, “Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1912-1915 (1995)

    work page 1912

  19. [19]

    Warm inflation,

    A. Berera, “Warm inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3218-3221 (1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    Thermal properties of an inflationary universe,

    A. Berera, “Thermal properties of an inflationary universe,” Phys. Rev. D54, 2519-2534 (1996)

    work page 1996

  21. [21]

    Interpolating the stage of exponential expansion in the early universe: A Pos- sible alternative with no reheating,

    A. Berera, “Interpolating the stage of exponential expansion in the early universe: A Pos- sible alternative with no reheating,” Phys. Rev. D55, 3346-3357 (1997)

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    Warm Inflation and its Microphysical Basis,

    A. Berera, I. G. Moss and R. O. Ramos, “Warm Inflation and its Microphysical Basis,” Rept. Prog. Phys.72, 026901 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Warm non-minimally coupled Peccei–Quinn inflation and de Sitter Swampland conjecture,

    J. Yuennan, P. Channuie and D. Momeni, “Warm non-minimally coupled Peccei–Quinn inflation and de Sitter Swampland conjecture,” Nucl. Phys. B1012, 116810 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Minimal warm higgs inflation in palatiniR 2 gravity,

    J. Yuennan, R. Myrzakulov, P. K. Sahoo, F. Atamurotov and P. Channuie, “Minimal warm higgs inflation in palatiniR 2 gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 972 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Perturbation spectra in the warm inflationary scenario,

    A. N. Taylor and A. Berera, “Perturbation spectra in the warm inflationary scenario,” Phys. Rev. D62, 083517 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Scalar perturbation spectra from warm inflation,

    L. M. H. Hall, I. G. Moss and A. Berera, “Scalar perturbation spectra from warm inflation,” Phys. Rev. D69, 083525 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Non-Gaussianity in fluctuations from warm inflation,

    I. G. Moss and C. Xiong, “Non-Gaussianity in fluctuations from warm inflation,” JCAP 04, 007 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    On the consistency of warm inflation,

    I. G. Moss and C. Xiong, “On the consistency of warm inflation,” JCAP11, 023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Density fluctuations from warm inflation,

    C. Graham and I. G. Moss, “Density fluctuations from warm inflation,” JCAP07, 013 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Hamilton-Jacobi formalism to warm inflationary scenario,

    K. Sayar, A. Mohammadi, L. Akhtari and K. Saaidi,“Hamilton-Jacobi formalism to warm inflationary scenario,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.2, 023501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Warm Vector Inflation,

    M. R. Setare and V. Kamali,“Warm Vector Inflation,” Phys. Lett. B726, 56-65 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Determining the regimes of cold and warm inflation in the SUSY hybrid model,

    M. Bastero-Gil and A. Berera,“Determining the regimes of cold and warm inflation in the SUSY hybrid model,” Phys. Rev. D71, 063515 (2005)

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Recent Developments in Warm Inflation,

    V. Kamali, M. Motaharfar and R. O. Ramos,“Recent Developments in Warm Inflation,” Universe9, no.3, 124 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Warm Inflation in the light of Swampland Criteria,

    S. Das,“Warm Inflation in the light of Swampland Criteria,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.6, 063514 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Formation of Primordial Black Holes from Warm Inflation,

    R. Arya,“Formation of Primordial Black Holes from Warm Inflation,” JCAP09, 042 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Runaway potentials in warm inflation satisfying the swampland conjectures,

    S. Das and R. O. Ramos,“Runaway potentials in warm inflation satisfying the swampland conjectures,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.10, 103522 (2020). 19

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Shear viscous effects on the primordial power spectrum from warm inflation,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, “Shear viscous effects on the primordial power spectrum from warm inflation,” JCAP07, 030 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Dissipation coefficients from scalar and fermion quantum field interactions,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera and R. O. Ramos, “Dissipation coefficients from scalar and fermion quantum field interactions,” JCAP09, 033 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Non-gaussianity in the strong regime of warm inflation,

    I. G. Moss and T. Yeomans, “Non-gaussianity in the strong regime of warm inflation,” JCAP08, 009 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Power spectrum for inflation models with quantum and thermal noises,

    R. O. Ramos and L. A. da Silva, “Power spectrum for inflation models with quantum and thermal noises,” JCAP03, 032 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    General dissipation coefficient in low-temperature warm inflation,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos and J. G. Rosa, “General dissipation coefficient in low-temperature warm inflation,” JCAP01, 016 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Warm inflation dynamics in the low temperature regime,

    M. Bastero-Gil and A. Berera, “Warm inflation dynamics in the low temperature regime,” Phys. Rev. D76, 043515 (2007)

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    Warm inflation within a supersymmetric distributed mass model,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Hern´ andez-Jim´ enez and J. G. Rosa, “Warm inflation within a supersymmetric distributed mass model,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.10, 103520 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Warm Little Inflaton,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos and J. G. Rosa, “Warm Little Inflaton,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.15, 151301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Dynamical and obser- vational constraints on the Warm Little Inflaton scenario,

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Hern´ andez-Jim´ enez and J. G. Rosa, “Dynamical and obser- vational constraints on the Warm Little Inflaton scenario,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.8, 083502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Minimal warm inflation with complete medium response,

    M. Laine and S. Procacci, “Minimal warm inflation with complete medium response,” JCAP 06, 031 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters,

    S. Aiolaet al.[ACT], “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters,” JCAP12, 047 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts,

    P. Adeet al.[Simons Observatory], “The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts,” JCAP02, 056 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition

    K. N. Abazajianet al.[CMB-S4], “CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02743 (2016)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Warm-assisted natural inflation,

    Y. Reyimuaji and X. Zhang, “Warm-assisted natural inflation,” JCAP04, 077 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Observational constraints on warm natural inflation,

    G. Montefalcone, V. Aragam, L. Visinelli and K. Freese, “Observational constraints on warm natural inflation,” JCAP03, 002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Warm DBI inflation with constant sound speed,

    S. Rasouli, K. Rezazadeh, A. Abdolmaleki and K. Karami, “Warm DBI inflation with constant sound speed,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.1, 79 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Warm λ 4 ϕ4 inflationary universe model in light of Planck 2015 results,

    G. Panotopoulos and N. Videla, “Warm λ 4 ϕ4 inflationary universe model in light of Planck 2015 results,” Eur. Phys. J. C75, no.11, 525 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Warm inflation dissipative effects: predictions and con- straints from the Planck data,

    M. Benetti and R. O. Ramos, “Warm inflation dissipative effects: predictions and con- straints from the Planck data,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.2, 023517 (2017). 20

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Dark Matter Production during Warm Inflation via Freeze-In,

    K. Freese, G. Montefalcone and B. Shams Es Haghi, “Dark Matter Production during Warm Inflation via Freeze-In,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Stage IV CMB forecasts for warm inflation,

    F. B. M. d. Santos, G. Rodrigues, R. de Souza and J. S. Alcaniz, “Stage IV CMB forecasts for warm inflation,” JCAP03, 062 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Three channel dissipative warm Higgs inflation with global inference via genetic algorithms,

    W. Cheng, “Three channel dissipative warm Higgs inflation with global inference via genetic algorithms,” arXiv:2512.23423 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Strong dissipative behavior in quantum field theory,

    A. Berera, M. Gleiser and R. O. Ramos, “Strong dissipative behavior in quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D58, 123508 (1998)

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    A First principles warm inflation model that solves the cosmological horizon / flatness problems,

    A. Berera, M. Gleiser and R. O. Ramos, “A First principles warm inflation model that solves the cosmological horizon / flatness problems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 264-267 (1999). 21

    work page 1999