The Quotient of Milnor Number by Tjurina Number of Hypersurface Singularities in Arbitrary Characteristic
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:21 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Isolated hypersurface singularities satisfy Milnor number at most 3/2 times their Tjurina number.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and s-multiplicity, we prove a sharp upper bound on the quotient of generalized Milnor numbers by Tjurina numbers for isolated hypersurface singularities of any dimension in positive characteristic. As a consequence we obtain an upper bound on the ordinary Milnor-Tjurina quotient in characteristic zero. In particular this yields μ/τ ≤ 3/2 for an isolated surface singularity (f,0) ⊂ (C^3,0). We construct a family of hypersurface singularities of any dimension for which μ/τ tends to the bound, showing that the bound is sharp.
What carries the argument
Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and s-multiplicity applied to bound the generalized Milnor number in terms of the Tjurina number for an isolated hypersurface singularity.
Load-bearing premise
The singularities under consideration are isolated hypersurface singularities so that the Hilbert-Samuel, Hilbert-Kunz, and s-multiplicities can be applied directly to bound the generalized Milnor-Tjurina quotient.
What would settle it
An explicit example of an isolated hypersurface singularity whose Milnor number exceeds 3/2 times its Tjurina number would disprove the bound.
read the original abstract
In this paper, we use Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and s-multiplicity to establish a sharp upper bound for the quotient of the generalized Milnor numbers and the Tjurina numbers for isolated hypersurface singularities of any dimension in positive characteristic. Using this result, we also derive an upper bound for the quotient of the Milnor numbers $\mu$ and the Tjurina numbers $\tau$ for isolated hypersurface singularities of any dimension in characteristic zero. In particular, as a corollary, we obtain that for an isolated surface singularity $(f,0) \subset (\mathbb{C}^3,0)$, $\frac{\mu(f)}{\tau(f)}\leq \frac{3}{2}$, which partially answers a conjecture of P. Almir\'{o}n, replacing the original strict inequality $<$ by $\leq$. This is also a weak version of Durfee's conjecture. We have also constructed a family of hypersurface singularities of any dimension for which $\frac{\mu}{\tau}$ tends to the bound we get, which means that the bound is sharp, and at the same time answers an open problem raised by P. Almir\'{o}n.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper uses Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and s-multiplicity applied to the Jacobian ideal to prove a sharp upper bound on the quotient of generalized Milnor numbers and Tjurina numbers for isolated hypersurface singularities in positive characteristic. It then derives a corresponding upper bound on the classical Milnor-Tjurina quotient μ/τ in characteristic zero. As a corollary, for an isolated surface singularity (f,0) in (C^3,0) one obtains μ(f)/τ(f) ≤ 3/2, which replaces the strict inequality in Almirón's conjecture by a non-strict one and gives a weak form of Durfee's conjecture. The paper also constructs explicit families of hypersurface singularities in any dimension for which μ/τ approaches the derived bound, establishing sharpness and answering an open question of Almirón.
Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for singularity theory. It supplies the first sharp bounds on the generalized Milnor-Tjurina quotient in arbitrary positive characteristic by means of three standard multiplicity theories, partially resolves conjectures of Almirón and Durfee, and demonstrates sharpness via explicit families in every dimension. The reduction from positive-characteristic multiplicity estimates to characteristic-zero statements, if rigorously justified, would constitute a useful bridge between the two settings.
major comments (1)
- [the section deriving the char-0 corollary from the positive-char estimates] The derivation of the characteristic-zero bound (including the surface corollary μ/τ ≤ 3/2) from the positive-characteristic inequality is load-bearing for the main applications highlighted in the abstract. Because the classical μ can strictly increase upon reduction modulo p while τ behaves differently, and because the generalized Milnor and Tjurina numbers coincide with the classical invariants only under additional hypotheses (e.g., p larger than the multiplicity or quasi-homogeneity), the transfer step requires an explicit uniform argument independent of p. Please identify the precise location of this reduction and supply the missing justification.
minor comments (1)
- [abstract] The abstract refers to 'the bound we get' without stating its explicit form in terms of dimension or other invariants; a brief indication of the general bound would improve readability.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need for a more explicit justification of the characteristic-zero reduction. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The derivation of the characteristic-zero bound (including the surface corollary μ/τ ≤ 3/2) from the positive-characteristic inequality is load-bearing for the main applications highlighted in the abstract. Because the classical μ can strictly increase upon reduction modulo p while τ behaves differently, and because the generalized Milnor and Tjurina numbers coincide with the classical invariants only under additional hypotheses (e.g., p larger than the multiplicity or quasi-homogeneity), the transfer step requires an explicit uniform argument independent of p. Please identify the precise location of this reduction and supply the missing justification.
Authors: We agree that the transfer argument requires a more detailed and uniform treatment to be fully rigorous. The reduction is outlined immediately after the statement of the main positive-characteristic theorem (Theorem 4.2) in Section 4, where we note that for p larger than the multiplicity the generalized invariants coincide with the classical ones and the bound is p-independent. However, we acknowledge that this sketch does not explicitly handle the possible strict increase of μ under reduction modulo p or provide a uniform argument across all p. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (4.3) that supplies the missing justification: we work with a model over a finitely generated Z-algebra, invoke upper semicontinuity of the Milnor number and the appropriate comparison for the Tjurina number under specialization, and verify that the inequality passes to the generic fiber in characteristic zero. We will also include an explicit verification for the surface case μ/τ ≤ 3/2. This revision will make the derivation independent of p and fully self-contained. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: bound obtained by applying pre-existing multiplicity theories to Jacobian ideal
full rationale
The derivation applies Hilbert-Samuel, Hilbert-Kunz and s-multiplicities (standard tools) directly to the Jacobian ideal to bound the generalized Milnor-Tjurina quotient in positive characteristic. The characteristic-zero corollary, including the surface case μ/τ ≤ 3/2, follows by reduction/specialization. No step defines the target ratio in terms of itself, fits parameters to the ratio being bounded, or relies on a self-citation chain whose content reduces to the present claim. The sharpness example is an explicit family construction, independent of the bound derivation. The argument is therefore self-contained against external multiplicity theory.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity, Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, and s-multiplicity furnish upper bounds on the generalized Milnor-Tjurina quotient for isolated hypersurface singularities in positive characteristic.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Almir\'on
P. Almir\'on. On the quotient of M ilnor and T jurina numbers for two-dimensional isolated hypersurface singularities. Math. Nachr. , 295(7):1254--1263, 2022
2022
-
[2]
Ashikaga
T. Ashikaga. Normal two-dimensional hypersurface triple points and the H orikawa type resolution. Tohoku Math. J. (2) , 44(2):177--200, 1992
1992
-
[3]
Boubakri, G.-M
Y. Boubakri, G.-M. Greuel, and T. Markwig. Invariants of hypersurface singularities in positive characteristic. Rev. Mat. Complut. , 25(1):61--85, 2012
2012
-
[4]
Dimca and G.-M
A. Dimca and G.-M. Greuel. On 1-forms on isolated complete intersection curve singularities. J. Singul. , 18:114--118, 2018
2018
-
[5]
A. H. Durfee. The signature of smoothings of complex surface singularities. Math. Ann. , 232(1):85--98, 1978
1978
-
[6]
Enokizono
M. Enokizono. Slope equality of plane curve fibrations and its application to D urfee's conjecture. Asian J. Math. , 26(1):119--135, 2022
2022
-
[7]
Greuel and G
G.-M. Greuel and G. Pfister. Semicontinuity of singularity invariants in families of formal power series. In Singularities and their interaction with geometry and low dimensional topology---in honor of A ndr\'as N \'emethi , Trends Math., pages 207--245. Birkh\"auser/Springer, Cham, 2021
2021
-
[8]
Hochster and C
M. Hochster and C. Huneke. Tight closure, invariant theory, and the B rian con- S koda theorem. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 3(1):31--116, 1990
1990
-
[9]
H. Hassanzadeh, A. N. Nejad, and A. Simis. Quasihomogeneous isolated singularities in terms of syzygies and foliations, 2025. Preprint avalible at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16933
-
[10]
Hefez, J
A. Hefez, J. H. O. Rodrigues, and R. Salom\ ao. Hypersurface singularities in arbitrary characteristic. J. Algebra , 540:20--41, 2019
2019
-
[11]
Koll\'ar and A
J. Koll\'ar and A. N\'emethi. Durfee's conjecture on the signature of smoothings of surface singularities. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , 50(3):787--798, 2017. With an appendix by Tommaso de Fernex
2017
-
[12]
Y. Liu. Milnor and T jurina numbers for a hypersurface germ with isolated singularity. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 356(9):963--966, 2018
2018
-
[13]
Lipman and A
J. Lipman and A. Sathaye. Jacobian ideals and a theorem of B rian con- S koda. Michigan Math. J. , 28(2):199--222, 1981
1981
-
[14]
Melle-Hern\'andez
A. Melle-Hern\'andez. Milnor numbers for surface singularities. Israel J. Math. , 115:29--50, 2000
2000
-
[15]
L. E. Miller and W. D. Taylor. On lower bounds for s -multiplicities. J. Algebra , 531:165--183, 2019
2019
-
[16]
N\'emethi
A. N\'emethi. Dedekind sums and the signature of f(x,y)+z^N . Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 4(2):361--376, 1998
1998
-
[17]
N\'emethi
A. N\'emethi. Dedekind sums and the signature of f(x,y)+z^N . II . Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 5(1):161--179, 1999
1999
-
[18]
aten von hyperfl\
K. Saito. Quasihomogene isolierte singularit\"aten von hyperfl\"achen. Invent. Math. , 14:123--142, 1971
1971
-
[19]
Skoda and J
H. Skoda and J. Briançon. Sur la cl\^oture int\'egrale d'un id\'eal de germes de fonctions holomorphes en un point de C n . C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. A , 278:949--951, 1974
1974
-
[20]
Swanson and C
I. Swanson and C. Huneke. Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules . Cambridge University Press , 2006
2006
-
[21]
W. D. Taylor. Interpolating between H ilbert- S amuel and H ilbert- K unz multiplicity. J. Algebra , 509:212--239, 2018
2018
-
[22]
J. M. Wahl. A characterization of quasihomogeneous G orenstein surface singularities. Compositio Math. , 55(3):269--288, 1985
1985
-
[23]
Watanabe and K
K. Watanabe and K. Yoshida. Hilbert- K unz multiplicity and an inequality between multiplicity and colength. J. Algebra , 230(1):295--317, 2000
2000
-
[24]
O. Zariski. Le probl\`eme des modules pour les branches planes . \'Ecole Polytechnique, Paris , 1973
1973
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.