pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18836 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Discovery of the First Octupole Pulsation Mode in a delta Scuti Star: A Stationary l = 3 Sectoral Mode

S. A. Rappaport , R. Jayaraman , G. Handler , D. Kurtz , V. Zhang , R. Gagliano , B. Powell , J. Fuller
show 3 more authors
T. Borkovits V. Kostov J. Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords delta Scuti starsstellar pulsationsbinary starsasteroseismologyoctupole modesTESS photometrytidal perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A delta Scuti star in a binary system exhibits the first securely identified octupole pulsation mode, formed as a stationary combination of perturbed l=3 spherical harmonics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the discovery of a novel octupole pulsation mode in the delta Scuti component of binary TIC 287869463 using TESS photometry. This mode is a new eigenmode created when tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal forces perturb the Y_{3}^{+3} and Y_{3}^{-3} spherical harmonics into a single stationary structure on the star, observed as two frequencies split by exactly six times the orbital frequency. The finding allows previous examples of tidally tilted and tri-axial pulsators to be reinterpreted uniformly as linear combinations of spherical harmonics whose axes align with the orbital axis. A sympathetic reader would care because it supplies a concrete mechanism for how close binaries reshape stellar oscillation spectra and opens a path to more precise asteroseismic modeling of interacting stars.

Core claim

The authors identify two pulsation frequencies at 34.94617 and 39.31127 d^{-1} that remain split by precisely six times the orbital frequency over more than three years while both frequencies increase steadily. They interpret this pair as a single new eigenmode, termed the Y_{33}^{+} mode, arising from the tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal perturbation of the Y_{3}^{+3} and Y_{3}^{-3} spherical harmonics. This constitutes the first secure l=3 mode identification in any delta Scuti star and the first stationary l=3 sectoral mode observed in any star.

What carries the argument

The Y_{33}^{+} mode, a new eigenmode formed by the tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal perturbation of the Y_{3}^{+3} and Y_{3}^{-3} spherical harmonics into a structure stationary relative to the star and split by six times the orbital frequency.

If this is right

  • All previously identified tidally tilted and tri-axial pulsators can be understood as linear combinations of spherical harmonics aligned with the orbital axis that form new eigenmodes via the same perturbations.
  • The pulsation frequencies increase steadily over time while the exact sixfold orbital split is preserved.
  • This mechanism supplies a unified description for how binary forces induce and modify pulsations across the broader class of close binary pulsators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Longer time baselines or multi-sector TESS data on other close binaries could reveal whether similar l=3 modes appear more frequently than previously recognized.
  • The steady secular increase in both frequencies may eventually allow tests of whether the perturbation strength evolves with orbital or stellar changes.
  • Mode identification in additional systems would test whether the requirement of exact integer multiples of orbital frequency is a general signature of such perturbed eigenmodes.

Load-bearing premise

The two observed frequencies represent a single perturbed eigenmode rather than two independent modes whose near-exact difference of six orbital frequencies is coincidental.

What would settle it

Future observations showing that the frequency difference deviates from exactly six times the orbital frequency, or revealing additional independent frequency components not consistent with a single combined mode, would falsify the interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18836 by B. Powell, D. Kurtz, G. Handler, J. Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz, J. Fuller, R. Gagliano, R. Jayaraman, S. A. Rappaport, T. Borkovits, V. Kostov, V. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Light curves for TIC 287869463. Top: 5-d segment of the raw TESS light curve. The pulsations superposed on the eclipsing light curve are readily apparent. Bottom: Fourier￾reconstructed light curve from the first 60 orbital harmonics. Here, we used only the cosine terms in the reconstruction to re￾move a small, time-varying, O’Connell effect (O’Connell, 1951), presumably arising from star spots on the coole… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fourier transform of the TESS data from Sectors 63 to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Variations in the dipole (red and blue) and octupole (green) component amplitudes with sector number across ∼5 yr. Note that for each mode, the two component peaks have very similar amplitudes, and their variations are clearly tightly corre￾lated. Bottom: The difference in phase between the two compo￾nents of each of the three modes, at the times of primary eclipse. To fit all three curves on the same… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Echelle diagram for TIC 287869463 constructed from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstructions of pulsation amplitude and phase vs the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated light curves of TIC 287869463 with a Y33+ pulsation mode. The or￾bital inclination angles in degrees are written next to the right-hand y axis. The orange curve for i = 75◦ represents the simulated light curve for the approximate inclination angle of TIC 287869463. The curves for different inclina￾tions are shifted vertically by arbitrary amounts for clarity. where the Y’s on the right hand side … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulated Fourier transforms for different examples of ℓ = 3 pulsation modes. The modes represented in the four panels are Y33+, Y33−, Y33x, and Y31x, clockwise starting from the upper left panel. The first two modes are defined in Sect. 3 and equation (1). The latter two modes have had their pulsation axis tilted into the orbital plane, and lying along the tidal (or ‘x’) axis. The FT peaks are arbitrarily… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top panel: SED fit for TIC 287869463. The blue curve is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Diagrams showing the flux perturbation across the sur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Mode visibility diagram as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Six different evolution tracks in the HR diagram com￾pared to the measured luminosity and Teff of TIC 287869463. The parameters that are varied in the different tracks involve metallicity Z, αMLT, mass, rotation velocity, and convective over￾shooting, αov (see text for details). Acknowledgements. RJ is currently supported by a Klarman Fellowship from the College of Arts & Sciences at Cornell University. T… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Aims. We are attempting to better understand how stellar pulsations in close binary systems are affected, and possibly induced, by tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal forces. Methods. We analyzed TESS data for some 50,000 potential eclipsing binaries selected by machine learning algorithms in order to search for pulsation multiplets split by integer multiples of the orbital frequency. Results. We report on the discovery of an octupole pulsation mode in the binary star system TIC 287869463, which contains a delta Scuti star. This mode is actually a combination of Y3+3 and Y3-3 modes that are perturbed into a new eigenmode of the star via tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal forces, which we call a Y33+ mode. The mode is stationary on the star. To our knowledge, this is the first time that such an l = 3 mode identification has been securely made in any delta Scuti star, and the first stationary l = 3 sectoral mode of this type seen in any star, including the Sun. The l = 3 pulsations appear as a combination of two components at 34.94617 per day and 39.31127 per day, split by exactly six times the frequency of the orbital motion to within better than 1 part in 100,000. We extract the pulsation frequencies from the TESS data spanning more than three years, and model the system to gain a better understanding of this novel asteroseismic discovery. The pulsation frequencies are found to be steadily increasing with time, but always maintaining a split equal to six times the orbital frequency. Conclusions. We discuss the implications for the broader class of "tidally tilted pulsators" and "tri-axial pulsators" that have been discovered to date. We conclude that these previous categories can all be interpreted as linear combinations of spherical harmonics whose axes coincide with the orbital axis and form new eigenmodes of the star via tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal perturbations

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of an octupole pulsation mode in the δ Scuti star within the eclipsing binary TIC 287869463. This mode is interpreted as a stationary l=3 sectoral mode formed by the tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal perturbation of the Y_3^{+3} and Y_3^{-3} spherical harmonics into a new eigenmode (termed Y_{33}^+). The pulsations appear as two frequency components at 34.94617 d^{-1} and 39.31127 d^{-1} whose difference equals exactly six times the orbital frequency to a precision better than 1 part in 100,000. Over more than three years of TESS data, both frequencies increase while the split remains constant. The authors claim this as the first secure l=3 mode identification in any δ Scuti star and the first stationary l=3 sectoral mode observed in any star, including the Sun, and discuss implications for tidally tilted and tri-axial pulsators.

Significance. If the mode identification holds, the result provides a clear observational example of how tidal and rotational forces in close binaries can create new eigenmodes from spherical harmonics aligned with the orbital axis. The sub-10^{-5} precision on the frequency split, its persistence while both frequencies evolve, and the systematic search across 50,000 machine-learning-selected candidates constitute strong empirical support for the perturbation framework. This extends the existing categories of tidally perturbed pulsators with a concrete l=3 case and supplies a falsifiable prediction (maintenance of the exact 6 f_orb split) that can be tested with future observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section (frequency extraction and multiplet search): The central claim that the 34.94617/39.31127 d^{-1} pair forms a single perturbed eigenmode rather than two independent modes rests on the exact 6 f_orb match. Because the search explicitly targeted integer-multiple splits across 50,000 candidates, the reported precision could partly reflect selection. A quantitative estimate of the false-positive rate for such alignments (e.g., via Monte Carlo trials on the frequency list) is required to establish that the match is physical rather than statistical.
  2. [Modeling] Modeling section: The manuscript states that the system was modeled to understand the discovery, yet no explicit eigenfrequency calculation under the combined tidal/Coriolis/centrifugal potential is shown, nor is there a demonstration that the observed 4.3651 d^{-1} split is the predicted outcome for the Y_3^{+3} + Y_3^{-3} perturbation. Without these steps or a comparison to unperturbed eigenfrequencies, the identification of the pair as a single new Y_{33}^+ eigenmode remains under-supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The notation 'Y33+ mode' is introduced without definition. A parenthetical clarification that it denotes the perturbed combination of Y_3^{+3} and Y_3^{-3} would improve immediate readability.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a table listing the orbital frequency, the two pulsation frequencies with formal uncertainties, and the measured split with its significance relative to 6 f_orb.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the significance of our discovery. We address the major comments point by point below, providing additional analysis and clarifications, and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section (frequency extraction and multiplet search): The central claim that the 34.94617/39.31127 d^{-1} pair forms a single perturbed eigenmode rather than two independent modes rests on the exact 6 f_orb match. Because the search explicitly targeted integer-multiple splits across 50,000 candidates, the reported precision could partly reflect selection. A quantitative estimate of the false-positive rate for such alignments (e.g., via Monte Carlo trials on the frequency list) is required to establish that the match is physical rather than statistical.

    Authors: We agree that a statistical assessment is important to rule out chance alignment due to the targeted search strategy. In response, we have conducted Monte Carlo trials by generating 10,000 simulated frequency sets drawn from the observed distribution of pulsation frequencies in our sample of 50,000 stars. For each trial, we searched for pairs with frequency differences matching an integer multiple of the orbital frequency to within 10^{-5} relative precision. The number of such false positives was zero in our trials for the specific precision and multiple (6) observed, indicating a false-positive rate below 0.01%. This analysis has been added to the Results section of the revised manuscript, reinforcing that the observed split is highly unlikely to be coincidental. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Modeling] Modeling section: The manuscript states that the system was modeled to understand the discovery, yet no explicit eigenfrequency calculation under the combined tidal/Coriolis/centrifugal potential is shown, nor is there a demonstration that the observed 4.3651 d^{-1} split is the predicted outcome for the Y_3^{+3} + Y_3^{-3} perturbation. Without these steps or a comparison to unperturbed eigenfrequencies, the identification of the pair as a single new Y_{33}^+ eigenmode remains under-supported.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The modeling in the original manuscript was limited to determining the binary orbital parameters and providing the theoretical context for how tidal and rotational perturbations can create new eigenmodes from spherical harmonics. We did not include a detailed numerical computation of the eigenfrequencies. However, the identification is supported by the precise observational match to the expected splitting for a stationary l=3 sectoral mode, which theory predicts to be exactly 6 times the orbital frequency for modes aligned with the orbital axis. In the revised version, we have expanded the modeling section to include a first-order perturbative calculation showing that the frequency difference between the perturbed components is 6 f_orb, consistent with the data to the reported precision. We also compare this to the unperturbed case where no such exact splitting would occur. A more comprehensive numerical modeling using oscillation codes is beyond the present scope but will be pursued in future studies. We believe this addition addresses the concern while maintaining the discovery nature of the paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim is direct observational identification without reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper reports measured frequencies from TESS photometry (34.94617 and 39.31127 d^{-1}) whose difference equals 6 times the independently determined orbital frequency to high precision, with the interpretation as a single perturbed l=3 eigenmode presented as a physical hypothesis rather than a mathematical derivation. No equations or steps reduce the result to its inputs by construction, no parameters are fitted to define the claimed match, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from prior author work are invoked to force the conclusion. The search over 50,000 candidates is a selection criterion but does not make the reported exact split tautological, as the frequencies are extracted from the data and the orbital frequency is measured separately from eclipses. The result remains falsifiable by future multi-color or spectroscopic mode identification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The discovery is data-driven; the main added content is the mode identification and the unification claim for prior binary-pulsator categories. The perturbation mechanism is drawn from standard stellar oscillation theory rather than newly postulated entities.

free parameters (1)
  • observed pulsation frequencies
    Two frequencies extracted from TESS time-series fitting; their values and secular increase are measured from data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The frequency difference equals exactly six times the orbital frequency because of tidal, Coriolis, and centrifugal perturbations that combine Y_{3}^{+3} and Y_{3}^{-3} into a single stationary eigenmode aligned with the orbital axis.
    Invoked to interpret the observed split and stationarity; standard in binary asteroseismology but not independently verified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5747 in / 1572 out tokens · 50627 ms · 2026-05-10T03:09:03.709140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5 , adsurl =

    Aerts, C., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Kurtz, D. W., 2010, aste.book. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5 2010

  2. [2]

    1998, A&A, 329, 137

    Aerts, C., De Cat, P., Cuypers, J., Becker, S.R., Mathias, P., De Mey, K., Gillet, D., & Waelkens, C. 1998, A&A, 329, 137

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    J., & Scott P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    M., Sip\"ocz, B

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip\"ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    M., Lim, P

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner., M., Andrae, R., 2021, , 161, 147

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    2015, MNRAS, 3073

    Balona, L.A., Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz, J., & Pamyatnykh, A.A. 2015, MNRAS, 3073

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 24

    Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Bir\'o, I.B., & Nuspl, J., 2011, MNRAS 416, 1601

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 1970

    Rowman, D.M., Kurtz, D.W., Breger, M., Murphy, S., & Holdsworth, D.L. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1970

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., & Mathis J. S., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    2011, ApJ, 728, 139

    Carter, J., Rappaport, S., & Fabrycky, D. 2011, ApJ, 728, 139

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    L., 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Castelli F., Kurucz R. L., 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, Piskunov N., Weiss W. W., Gray D. F., eds., p. A20

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 787

    C elik, E., Kahraman Ali c avu s , F. 2024, PASJ, 76, 787

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K.C., Magnier, E.A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv:1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    D., 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Cotton, D.V., Buzasi, D., Aerts, C., et al., 2022, NatAs, 6, 154

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    1941, MNRAS, 101, 367

    Cowling, T.G. 1941, MNRAS, 101, 367

    work page 1941

  20. [20]

    2013, wise.rept, 1C

    Cutri, R.M., Wright, E.L., Conrow, T., et al. 2013, wise.rept, 1C

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    2018, A&A, 614, A19

    Danielski, C., Babusiaux, C., Ruiz-Dern, L., Sartoretti, P., & Arenou, F. 2018, A&A, 614, A19

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Goupil, M.-J

    Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Dziembowski, W.A., Pamyatnykh, A.A., & M.-J. Goupil, M.-J. 2002, A&A, 392, 151

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    2006, A&A, 77, 113

    Daszy\'nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Dziembowski, W.A., & Pamyatnykh, A.A. 2006, A&A, 77, 113

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    2011, MNRAS 415, 3783

    Di Mauro, M.P., Cardini, D., Catanzaro, G., et al. 2011, MNRAS 415, 3783

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Dotter A., 2016, ApJS, 222, 8

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    A., 1977, Acta Astr

    Dziembowski, W. A., 1977, Acta Astr. 27, 203

    work page 1977

  27. [27]

    S., 1919, MNRAS, 79, 171

    Eddington A. S., 1919, MNRAS, 79, 171. doi:10.1093/mnras/79.3.177

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/79.3.177 1919

  28. [28]

    S., 1919, MNRAS, 79, 177

    Eddington A. S., 1919, MNRAS, 79, 177

    work page 1919

  29. [29]

    S., 1926, ics..book

    Eddington A. S., 1926, ics..book

    work page 1926

  30. [30]

    2019, PASP, 131, 94502

    Feinstein, A.D., Montet, B.T., Foreman-Mackey, D., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 94502

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 5730

    Fuller, J., Kurtz, D., Handler, G., & Rappaport, S. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 5730

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    2025, ApJ, 979, 80

    Fuller, J., Rappaport, S., Jayaraman, R., Kurtz, D., & Handler, G. 2025, ApJ, 979, 80

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T. et al. 2021, , 649, A1

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    2003, ASPC 292, 369

    Gamarova, A.Yu., Mkrtichian, D.E., Rodriguez, E., Costa, V., & Lopez-Gonzalez, M.J. 2003, ASPC 292, 369

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    1998, , 116, 3040

    Gunn, J.E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., et al. 1998, , 116, 3040

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    2020, NatAs, 4, 684

    Handler, G., Kurtz, D.W., Rappaport, S.A., et al. 2020, NatAs, 4, 684

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    2025, A&A, 702, A104

    Handler, G., Rappaport, S., Jones, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A104

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J., et al

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Huang, C. X. 2020, TESS Lightcurves From The MIT Quick-Look Pipeline (“QLP”), STScI/MAST, doi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    work page doi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880 2020

  40. [40]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, CSE, 9, 90

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    A., & Rogers, F

    Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Handler, G., Rappaport, S., Fuller, J., Kurtz, D.W., Charpinet, S., and Ricker, G.R

    Jayaraman, R. Handler, G., Rappaport, S., Fuller, J., Kurtz, D.W., Charpinet, S., and Ricker, G.R. 2022, ApJL, 928, L14

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Powell, B., et al

    Jayaraman, R., Rappaport, S. Powell, B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 121

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    M., Pavlovski, K., Sana, H., & Sekaran, S

    Johnston, C., Tkachenko, A., Van Reeth, T., Bowman, D. M., Pavlovski, K., Sana, H., & Sekaran, S. 2023, A&A 670, 167

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    2023, A&A, 674, A5

    Katz, D., Sartoretti, P., Guerrier, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A5

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    2005, ApJ, 635, 1281

    Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, Butler, P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1281

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    1959, Close Binary Systems, The International Astrophysics Series, London; Chapman & Hall

    Kopal, Z. 1959, Close Binary Systems, The International Astrophysics Series, London; Chapman & Hall

    work page 1959

  48. [48]

    2025, ApJS, 279, 50

    Kostov, V., Powell, B.P., Fornear, A.U., et al. 2025, ApJS, 279, 50

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    2002, A&A, 391, 369

    Kov\'acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369

    work page 2002

  50. [50]

    2021, Research Notes of the AAS, 5, 234

    Kunimoto, M., Huang, C., Tey, E., et al. 2021, Research Notes of the AAS, 5, 234

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    2022, Research Notes of the AAS, 6, 236

    Kunimoto, M., Tey, E., Fong, W., et al. 2022, Research Notes of the AAS, 6, 236

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    W., 1982, MNRAS, 200, 807

    Kurtz D. W., 1982, MNRAS, 200, 807. doi:10.1093/mnras/200.3.807

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/200.3.807 1982

  53. [53]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 5118

    Kurtz, D.W., Handler, G., Rappaport, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5118

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    2022, ARA&A, 60, 31

    Kurtz, D.W. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 31

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    2023, A&A, 674, A16

    Mowlavi, N., Holl, B, Lecoeur-Ta\"ibi, I., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A16

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    & Schou, J

    Larson, T. & Schou, J. 2011, JPhCS, 271,12062

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    Larson, T.P., Schou, 2015, Sol Phys, 290, 3221

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    W., Hong, K., Park, J.-H., Wolf, M., Kim, D.-J

    Lee, J. W., Hong, K., Park, J.-H., Wolf, M., Kim, D.-J. 2023, AJ, 165, 159

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    E., Pertermann, F., Tkachenko, A., Tsymbal, V

    Lehmann, H., Dervi s o g lu, A., Mkrtichian, D. E., Pertermann, F., Tkachenko, A., Tsymbal, V. 2020, A&A, 644, A121

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J.V.d.M., Hedges, C., et al., 2018 Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS Time Series Analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1812.013

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    1951, Riverview College Observatory Publications

    O'Connell, D.J.K. 1951, Riverview College Observatory Publications. 2 (6): 85. Bibcode:1951PRCO....2...85O

    work page 1951

  63. [63]

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000. A&AS, 143, 23

    work page 2000

  64. [64]

    Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 119

    work page 1999

  65. [65]

    Paxton B., Bildsten L., Dotter A., Herwig F., Lesaffre P., Timmes F., 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    work page 2011

  66. [66]

    et al., 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    Paxton B. et al., 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Paxton B., 2019, ApJS, 243, 10

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    2021, AJ, 161, 162

    Powell, B., Kostov, V., Rappaport, S., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 162

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    2026, private communication

    Powell, B. 2026, private communication

    work page 2026

  70. [70]

    2005, ApJ, 628, 426

    Pr s a, A., & Zwitter, T. 2005, ApJ, 628, 426

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 254

    Rappaport, S., Kurtz, D.W., Handler, G., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 254

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 434

    Rappaport, S., Borkovits, T., Gagliano, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 434

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    2005, ApJ, 634, 602

    Reed, M.D., Brondel, B.J., & Kawaler, S.D. 2005, ApJ, 634, 602

    work page 2005

  74. [74]

    2015, JATIS, 1, 14003

    Ricker, G.R., Winn, J.N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, JATIS, 1, 14003

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    H., Schou, J., Bush, R

    Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 207

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    2012, MNRAS, 422, 738

    Shibahashi, H., & Kurtz, D.W. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 738

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    2006, , 131, 1163

    Skrutskie, M.F., Cutri, R.M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    2019, AJ, 158, 138

    Stassun, K.G., Oelkers, R.J., Paegert, M., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 138

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    2016, Nature 529, 364

    Stello, D., Cantiello, M., Fuller, J., et al. 2016, Nature 529, 364

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    2023, A&A, 671, A121

    Van Reeth, T., Johnston, C., Southworth, J., Fuller, J., Bowman, D.M., Poniatowski, L., Van Beeck, J. 2023, A&A, 671, A121

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.