pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19427 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 💻 cs.NI · cs.SY· eess.SY

Direction-Dependent Path Loss Modeling in Olive Orchards for Precision Agriculture

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI cs.SYeess.SY
keywords path loss modelingolive orchardsprecision agricultureLoRadirection-dependent propagationwireless sensor networksRSSI
0
0 comments X

The pith

A topology-based model that accounts for olive orchard row directions fits measured RSSI data more closely than standard free-space or vegetation path loss models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Wireless links in row-structured olive orchards show markedly different attenuation along the rows versus across them, a variation that conventional models like free space path loss or ITU-R vegetation loss fail to capture. The paper develops a two-dimensional propagation model built directly on the plantation layout and the relative positions of the radio devices. Validation uses LoRa transmissions at 868 MHz, with comparisons showing the new model reduces discrepancies against collected received signal strength data. This supplies a more accurate foundation for calculating link budgets and designing wireless networks inside structured agricultural settings.

Core claim

Signal attenuation in olive groves differs markedly between along-row and cross-row propagation directions. The proposed topology-based model explicitly incorporates orchard layout and device positions within that structure, yielding a closer fit to measured RSSI values than the Free Space Path Loss model or ITU-R vegetation loss formulations.

What carries the argument

The two-dimensional topology-based propagation model that treats orchard row geometry and relative device positions as the primary determinants of directional path loss.

If this is right

  • Link budgets for wireless sensor networks in row plantations can be calculated with reduced over- or under-estimation of coverage.
  • Network planning tools can incorporate directional effects when placing nodes along versus across planting rows.
  • LoRa-based precision agriculture deployments gain a more reliable basis for predicting connectivity in structured groves.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same directional dependence is likely to appear in other regularly planted row crops such as vineyards.
  • The model could be tested for sensitivity to seasonal foliage changes by repeating measurements at different times of year.
  • Antenna height or orientation choices might be optimized once the dominant propagation directions are known from the layout.

Load-bearing premise

The regular row geometry is the dominant source of signal variability and other influences such as tree height or foliage changes can be averaged out or treated as secondary.

What would settle it

A set of RSSI measurements collected in an olive orchard with highly irregular row spacing or tree density that shows the proposed model no longer improves the fit over conventional distance-based models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19427 by Katarzyna Kosek-Szott, Mohammad Rowhani Sistani, Pierluigi Gallo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Propagation conditions in two different positions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: Traditional plantation density (a); high-density plantation pattern (b). Propagation conditions in two different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4: Simulated LoRa coverage within the CupCarbon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5: Simulated receiver trajectory within the orchard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6: Predicted RSSI along the simulated gateway [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIGURE 7: Heltec CubeCell HTCC-AB01 LoRa modules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIGURE 9: Olive orchard measured RSSI heatmap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIGURE 10: Comparison of modeled and measured RSSI for the mid-corridor scenario at 1.2 m height: the ITU-R (a), multi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Wireless links deployed in orchards often exhibit significant variability in the strength of the received signal that is not adequately captured by classical distance-based propagation models. In row-structured olive groves, signal attenuation differs markedly between along-row and cross-row propagation directions, leading to discrepancies when using omnidirectional propagation assumptions such as those adopted in the Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) model or ITU-R vegetation loss formulations. This paper proposes a topology-based propagation model that explicitly accounts for orchard layout and the relative positions of radio devices within the plantation structure. Experimental validation was conducted using LoRa technology operating at 868 MHz, and the results were compared with established models from the literature and with the proposed two-dimensional model. The proposed approach achieves a closer fit to measured RSSI data than conventional models, providing a more reliable basis for link budgeting and network planning in structured agricultural environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a topology-based 2D propagation model for LoRa links at 868 MHz in row-structured olive orchards that explicitly differentiates attenuation along-row versus cross-row directions due to plantation geometry, and reports that this model yields a closer fit to measured RSSI data than the FSPL or ITU-R vegetation models, thereby improving link-budget reliability for precision-agriculture networks.

Significance. If the reported improvement holds under broader conditions, the work would provide a practical, geometry-aware alternative to isotropic models for wireless IoT planning in structured agricultural environments, potentially reducing over-provisioning or outage risks in row-crop deployments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'closer fit' to RSSI data is stated without any quantitative error metrics (RMSE, MAE, R²), measurement counts, or statistical significance tests comparing the proposed model against FSPL and ITU-R baselines; this absence makes the improvement unverifiable from the supplied text.
  2. [Model] Model section: no explicit equations are supplied for the direction-specific attenuation coefficients or their dependence on row spacing and device placement, preventing assessment of whether the 2D model is derived from first principles or fitted post-hoc to the same RSSI traces later used for validation.
  3. [Experimental validation] Experimental validation: results are confined to a single orchard without cross-site replication, sensitivity sweeps over tree height/density, or seasonal foliage variation; if these factors introduce variance comparable to row geometry, the claimed generality for 'structured agricultural environments' does not follow.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Experimental setup] Add a table or figure caption that reports the exact number of RSSI samples, transmitter/receiver heights, and orchard dimensions to support reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major point below, revising the paper where the concerns can be directly resolved through added clarity or discussion. Our responses focus on substance and indicate the specific changes made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'closer fit' to RSSI data is stated without any quantitative error metrics (RMSE, MAE, R²), measurement counts, or statistical significance tests comparing the proposed model against FSPL and ITU-R baselines; this absence makes the improvement unverifiable from the supplied text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should include quantitative metrics to allow immediate verification of the improvement. The body of the manuscript already contains the full comparison with RMSE, MAE, R², the total number of RSSI measurements collected, and the results of statistical tests against the baselines. We have revised the abstract to incorporate these values and the measurement count so that the central claim is supported directly in the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model] Model section: no explicit equations are supplied for the direction-specific attenuation coefficients or their dependence on row spacing and device placement, preventing assessment of whether the 2D model is derived from first principles or fitted post-hoc to the same RSSI traces later used for validation.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The direction-dependent coefficients are obtained from the geometric layout (row spacing, orientation, and relative device positions) rather than being fitted to the validation RSSI data. We have added the explicit equations for the along-row and cross-row attenuation terms, together with their dependence on row spacing and placement, in the revised Model section. This makes the first-principles derivation from orchard topology transparent. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experimental validation] Experimental validation: results are confined to a single orchard without cross-site replication, sensitivity sweeps over tree height/density, or seasonal foliage variation; if these factors introduce variance comparable to row geometry, the claimed generality for 'structured agricultural environments' does not follow.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the measurements were performed in one representative olive orchard and that additional cross-site replication, sensitivity analysis over tree height and density, and seasonal data would further strengthen generality claims. The model parameters are expressed directly in terms of row spacing and geometry, which are the dominant variables in row-structured plantations; we have added a dedicated limitations paragraph in the revised Discussion section that explicitly discusses the potential influence of tree height, density, and foliage changes and states that multi-site validation is planned for future work. The current results therefore demonstrate the value of the topology-aware approach within the tested class of environments while qualifying the scope of the claims. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain; model proposed from topology and validated empirically

full rationale

The paper derives a direction-dependent path loss model from orchard row geometry and relative device positions, then reports an empirical comparison of fit quality against FSPL and ITU-R models on LoRa RSSI measurements. No equations, self-citations, or parameter-fitting steps are shown that reduce the claimed improvement to a tautology or to the same data used for fitting. The central claim remains an independent empirical observation rather than a self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no equations or parameter lists are supplied, so the ledger remains empty. The model is described as topology-based but its mathematical form, any fitted coefficients, and background assumptions are not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5455 in / 1107 out tokens · 55919 ms · 2026-05-10T02:07:38.493115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Path loss prediction model development in a mountainous forest environment,

    B. Myagmardulam, N. Tadachika, K. Takahashi, R. Miura, F. Ono, T. Kagawa, L. Shan, and F. Kojima, “Path loss prediction model development in a mountainous forest environment,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 2494–2501, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9586048

  2. [2]

    A multiwall path-loss prediction model using 433 mhz lora-wan frequency to characterize foliage’s influence in a malaysian palm oil plantation environment,

    R. Anzum, M. H. Habaebi, M. R. Islam, G. P. Hakim, M. U. Khandaker, H. Osman, S. Alamri, and E. AbdElrahim, “A multiwall path-loss prediction model using 433 mhz lora-wan frequency to characterize foliage’s influence in a malaysian palm oil plantation environment,” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 22, p. 5397, 7 2022. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.nc...

  3. [3]

    An experimental evaluation of rssi-lora in an olive tree plantations,

    D. A. Quispetupa, J. P. Fernandez, and R. Q. Tacas, “An experimental evaluation of rssi-lora in an olive tree plantations,” Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Engineering International Research Conference, EIRCON 2022, 2022

  4. [4]

    Cupcarbon: A multi- agent and discrete event wireless sensor network design and simulation tool,

    K. Mehdi, M. Lounis, A. Bounceur, and T. Kechadi, “Cupcarbon: A multi- agent and discrete event wireless sensor network design and simulation tool,” in Proceedings of the 7th International ICST Conference on Simula- tion Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 2014

  5. [5]

    Corresponding author: Agbolade o. a performance evaluation of lorawan sx1276 radio in non-line of sight conditions,

    O. A. Agbolade, “Corresponding author: Agbolade o. a performance evaluation of lorawan sx1276 radio in non-line of sight conditions,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 19, pp. 1385–1392,

  6. [6]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.3.2019

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.3.2019

  7. [7]

    Vegetation effects on lora-based wireless sensor communication for remote monitoring of automatic orchard irrigation status,

    S. Ahmed, M. N. Reza, Samsuzzaman, M. R. Karim, H. Jin, H. Kim, and S.-O. Chung, “Vegetation effects on lora-based wireless sensor communication for remote monitoring of automatic orchard irrigation status,” IoT 2025, V ol. 6, Page 2, vol. 6, p. 2, 12 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-831X/6/1/2/htmhttps: //www.mdpi.com/2624-831X/6/1/2

  8. [8]

    Internet of robotic things with a local lora network for teleoperation of an agricultural mobile robot using a digital shadow,

    R. R. Shamshiri, E. Navas, V . Dworak, T. Schütte, C. Weltzien, and F. A. Cheein, “Internet of robotic things with a local lora network for teleoperation of an agricultural mobile robot using a digital shadow,” Discover Applied Sciences 2024 6:8, vol. 6, pp. 1–18, 7 2024. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-024-06106-7 10...

  9. [9]

    Lora signal propagation and path loss prediction in tunisian date palm oases,

    T. Mahjoub, A. B. Mnaouer, M. B. Said, and H. Boujemaa, “Lora signal propagation and path loss prediction in tunisian date palm oases,” Com- puters and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 222, p. 109027, 7 2024

  10. [10]

    Trace-driven simulation for lorawan868 mhz propagation in an urban scenario trace-driven simulation for lorawan 868 mhz propagation in an urban scenario

    E. . Harinda, H. . Larijani, R. M. Gibson, E. Harinda, and H. Larijani, “Trace-driven simulation for lorawan868 mhz propagation in an urban scenario trace-driven simulation for lorawan 868 mhz propagation in an urban scenario.” [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/UCET.2019. 8881854

  11. [11]

    Numerical solution of fspl heat conduction equation for analysis of thermal propagation,

    T. N. Mishra and K. N. Rai, “Numerical solution of fspl heat conduction equation for analysis of thermal propagation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 273, pp. 1006–1017, 1 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0096300315014332?casa_token=YwQN41cxg1Y AAAAA: gjDTlHprBk0aHcVkuRaTn0t7M6hUiFFYwm5ICjp_ bvaX5Ra...

  12. [12]

    Directional radio propagation path loss models for millimeter-wave wireless networks in the 28-, 60-, and 73-ghz bands,

    A. I. Sulyman, A. Alwarafy, G. R. MacCartney, T. S. Rappaport, and A. Alsanie, “Directional radio propagation path loss models for millimeter-wave wireless networks in the 28-, 60-, and 73-ghz bands,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, pp. 6939– 6947, 10 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/7522613

  13. [13]

    Recommendation itu-r p.833-10 - attenuation in vegetation,

    I. R. Bureau, “Recommendation itu-r p.833-10 - attenuation in vegetation,”

  14. [14]

    Available: http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en

    [Online]. Available: http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en

  15. [15]

    A critical review of the propagation models employed in lora systems,

    J. A. Azevedo and F. Mendonça, “A critical review of the propagation models employed in lora systems,” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 24, p. 3877, 6 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/PMC11207269/

  16. [16]

    A multi-wall-and-floor model for indoor radio propagation,

    M. Lott and I. Forkel, “A multi-wall-and-floor model for indoor radio propagation,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 464– 468, 2001

  17. [17]

    A modified multi-wall wave propagation model for concrete based building structure,

    A. I. Sulaiman and M. A. Hussein, “A modified multi-wall wave propagation model for concrete based building structure,” 2012 International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering, ICCCE 2012, pp. 325–330, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6271205

  18. [18]

    Investigating signal propagation and strength distribution characteristics of wireless sensor networks in date palm orchards,

    Y . Rao, Z. hui Jiang, and N. Lazarovitch, “Investigating signal propagation and strength distribution characteristics of wireless sensor networks in date palm orchards,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 124, pp. 107–120, 6 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169916300928

  19. [19]

    A tree attenuation factor model for a low-power wide-area network in a ruby mango plantation,

    S. Phaiboon and P. Phokharatkul, “A tree attenuation factor model for a low-power wide-area network in a ruby mango plantation,” Sensors 2024, V ol. 24, Page 750, vol. 24, p. 750, 1 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/3/750/htmhttps://www. mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/3/750

  20. [20]

    Link quality modeling for lora networks in orchards,

    K. Yang, Y . Chen, X. Chen, and W. Du, “Link quality modeling for lora networks in orchards,” IPSN 2023 - Proceedings of the 2023 22nd International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 27–39, 5 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3583120.3586969

  21. [21]

    Radio propa- gation measurement and characterization in outdoor tall food grass agri- culture field for wireless sensor network at 2.4 ghz band,

    T. Srisooksai, K. Kaemarungsi, J. Takada, and K. Saito, “Radio propa- gation measurement and characterization in outdoor tall food grass agri- culture field for wireless sensor network at 2.4 ghz band,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 88, pp. 43–58, 2018

  22. [22]

    A dual- directional path-loss model in 5g wireless fractal small cell networks,

    J. Chen, F. Bin, X. Ge, Q. Li, and C. X. Wang, “A dual- directional path-loss model in 5g wireless fractal small cell networks,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, 7 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7997405

  23. [23]

    Structure, management and productivity of hedgerow olive orchards: A review,

    D. J. Connor, M. G. del Campo, M. C. Rousseaux, and P. S. Searles, “Structure, management and productivity of hedgerow olive orchards: A review,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 169, pp. 71–93, 4

  24. [24]

    Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0304423814000831

    [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0304423814000831

  25. [25]

    Cultivar and tree density as key factors in the long-term performance of super high-density olive orchards,

    C. M. Diez, J. Moral, D. Cabello, P. Morello, L. Rallo, and D. Barranco, “Cultivar and tree density as key factors in the long-term performance of super high-density olive orchards,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, p. 209448, 8 2016. [Online]. Available: www.frontiersin.org

  26. [26]

    Preliminary observations about the performance of 13 varieties according to the super high density oliveculture training system in apulia (southern italy),

    S. Camposeo and G. A., “Preliminary observations about the performance of 13 varieties according to the super high density oliveculture training system in apulia (southern italy),” Adv. Hort. Sci, vol. 24, pp. 16–20, 01 2010

  27. [27]

    Cupcarbon klines: Agentic ai and digital twin iot simulation platform,

    A. Bounceur and C. Team, “Cupcarbon klines: Agentic ai and digital twin iot simulation platform,” https://www.cupcarbon.com, 2025, accessed: 19 November 2025

  28. [28]

    (2025) Apple maps

    Apple Inc. (2025) Apple maps. Accessed: 2025-04-16. [Online]. Available: https://maps.apple.com

  29. [29]

    2-d anisotropic radio propagation model in olive groves for precision agriculture [github repository],

    M. R. Sistani, K. Kosek-Szott, and P. Gallo, “2-d anisotropic radio propagation model in olive groves for precision agriculture [github repository],” https://github.com/MRowhani/ 2-D-Anisotropic-Radio-Propagation-Model.git, 2025, accessed: 11 November 2025

  30. [30]

    Connectivity smart agriculture – cupcarbon project,

    M. Rowhani, “Connectivity smart agriculture – cupcarbon project,” https://github.com/MRowhani/connectivity-smart-agriculture/blob/ 7bf3ce9efb10767e2144dbe10c9d0f7e10160f1c/cupcarbon%20project/ uni.farm.project.final.zip, 2025, gitHub repository, accessed: Oct. 28, 2025

  31. [31]

    1.1), Chengdu Heltec Automation Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China, Sep

    HTCC-AB01_V2 LoRa Node Development Kit (Rev. 1.1), Chengdu Heltec Automation Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China, Sep. 2022, documents Rev. 1.1. [Online]. Available: https://resource.heltec.cn/ download/CubeCell/HTCC-AB01_V2/HTCC-AB01_V2(Rev1.1).pdf MOHAMMAD ROWHANI SIST ANIMoham- mad Rowhani Sistani received the M.Sc. degree in International Business Ma...

  32. [32]

    She is currently a Full Professor with the Institute of Telecommunications, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland. Her research focuses on wireless networking, includ- ing wireless LANs, quality of service provision- ing, novel amendments to the IEEE 802.11 stan- dard, 5G/6G networks, and coexistence of radio technologies. She has coaut...