The fragmentation properties of massive star-forming regions in 30Dor-10 at 2000 au resolution

A. Nucara; A. Traficante; C. Mininni; E. Sabbi; J. Soler; M. J. Jimenez-Donaire; P. Hennebelle; R. Indebetouw; R. Klessen; S. Molinari

arxiv: 2604.19878 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The fragmentation properties of massive star-forming regions in 30Dor-10 at 2000 au resolution

A. Traficante , M. J. Jimenez-Donaire , R. Indebetouw , T. Wong , A. Nucara , R. Klessen , P. Hennebelle , U. Lebreuilly

show 4 more authors

C. Mininni S. Molinari E. Sabbi J. Soler

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords core mass functionstar formationinitial mass functionLarge Magellanic Cloudfragmentation30 Doradusmassive stars

0 comments

The pith

The core mass function in 30Dor-10 follows a Salpeter-like slope, linking fragmentation directly to the stellar initial mass function.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how parsec-scale gas clumps in the 30Dor-10 region of the Large Magellanic Cloud break into dense cores at 2000 au resolution. It derives the core mass function from these observations and shows that its power-law slope matches the Salpeter form long used to describe stellar masses. This match implies that the basic distribution of masses is fixed during fragmentation. Any top-heavy stellar mass distributions seen in extreme environments must then arise from later evolutionary stages such as accretion or dynamical interactions rather than from the initial core masses themselves. A reader would care because the result supplies the first direct extragalactic constraint on whether the initial mass function is universal at its earliest stage.

Core claim

High-resolution observations of the 30Dor-10 region demonstrate that the core mass function is consistent with a Salpeter-like slope, indicating that the initial fragmentation of gas into cores produces a standard mass distribution and that observed variations in stellar mass functions arise from subsequent evolutionary processes rather than from differences in the fragmentation itself.

What carries the argument

The core mass function, the statistical distribution of masses of dense gas condensations identified in dust continuum maps at 2000 au resolution, fitted to a power-law form and compared to the stellar initial mass function.

Load-bearing premise

The cores detected at 2000 au resolution are the direct, uncontaminated progenitors of individual stars or small multiples, with mass estimates that suffer no significant incompleteness or systematic bias at low masses.

What would settle it

A statistically significant deviation from the Salpeter power-law index in the core mass function when the same region is observed at substantially higher resolution or when additional extragalactic regions are mapped at matched resolution would falsify the reported consistency.

read the original abstract

The fragmentation properties of parsec-scales clumps play a fundamental role in shaping the dense gas condensations known as cores, the immediate progenitor of stars. The distribution of core masses, the so-called core mass function, is the precursor of the stellar initial mass function, which governs the distribution of stellar masses and, consequently, the evolution of galaxies. The stellar initial mass function is often described by a typical Salpeter-like slope, although deviations toward more top-heavy distributions have been reported in extreme environments, raising questions about its universality and about the physical connection between the two mass functions. To date, there are no observational constraints on the core mass function and its link to the initial mass function beyond the Milky Way. Here we present a study of the fragmentation properties and the measurement of the core mass function in an external galaxy, focusing on the 30Dor-10 region in the Large Magellanic Cloud, using high resolution observations that probe spatial scales down to 2000 au. Robust statistical analysis demonstrates that the core mass function is consistent with a Salpeter-like slope and suggests that variations in the stellar mass distribution arise from evolutionary processes rather than from initial fragmentation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper reports the first core mass function measurement in an external galaxy at 2000 au scales and finds a Salpeter-like slope, but the result depends on how they handled dust temperature and completeness.

read the letter

The punchline is that this work gives the first observational CMF beyond the Milky Way, from 30Dor-10 in the LMC, and claims the power-law index lines up with Salpeter. That directly tests whether core fragmentation sets the IMF shape or if later evolution does the work. The data come from high-resolution observations that actually resolve cores at those small scales in a different galactic environment, which is new and fills a clear gap. They identify cores, derive masses from dust continuum, and run a statistical fit that they describe as robust. That part is useful because it supplies an external benchmark for models that assume universal fragmentation physics. The observations themselves look solid for what they are trying to do. The main soft spot is in the mass estimates. Masses come from flux assuming a single dust temperature, and 30 Dor has strong local heating from massive stars. If low-mass cores are warmer than assumed, their masses get underestimated and can shift across bins or drop out, which moves the fitted slope by a few tenths. The stress-test note on uniform T_d and low-mass incompleteness is worth checking in the full methods. If the paper only used a fixed 20 K or similar without variable-temperature tests or detailed completeness simulations that include the temperature gradient, the “consistent with Salpeter” claim rests on an untested assumption rather than the data alone. Incompleteness at the sensitivity limit can truncate the low end the same way. This paper is for people who work on star formation, the IMF, and extragalactic fragmentation. A reader who wants to see whether the CMF is universal across environments will get real value from the numbers and the region choice. It deserves a serious referee because the novelty is high and the observations are high-resolution, even though the mass derivation needs close scrutiny in review. I would send it out with a request for explicit checks on temperature assumptions and completeness.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents high-resolution (∼2000 au) ALMA observations of the 30Dor-10 region in the Large Magellanic Cloud, identifies dense cores, derives their masses from dust continuum, and measures the core mass function (CMF). It reports that the CMF is consistent with a Salpeter-like power-law slope via robust statistical analysis and concludes that variations in the stellar initial mass function arise from evolutionary processes rather than differences in the initial fragmentation properties.

Significance. If the CMF slope measurement proves robust, this would be the first direct extragalactic constraint on the CMF at scales comparable to Galactic studies. It would support the universality of the fragmentation process across environments and indicate that IMF variations in extreme star-forming regions are driven by post-fragmentation evolution, with implications for star-formation models in metal-poor or high-radiation galaxies.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (core mass estimation): Core masses are derived from the dust continuum flux via the standard relation M ∝ F_ν D² / (κ_ν B_ν(T_d)). The manuscript adopts a single fixed dust temperature. In 30Dor-10, local heating by O stars creates T_d gradients; warmer low-mass cores would have masses underestimated, preferentially shifting or removing objects from the low-mass end and potentially flattening the fitted high-mass slope. No sensitivity tests with varying T_d or spatially resolved temperature maps are described, leaving the Salpeter consistency dependent on an untested assumption.
[§5] §5 (statistical analysis and CMF fitting): The claim of a Salpeter-like slope rests on 'robust statistical analysis,' but the text does not detail the fitting procedure, binning, completeness corrections, or how the sample selection and sensitivity limit at 2000 au affect the low-mass end. Incompleteness below the detection threshold can truncate the distribution and bias the power-law index by several tenths; without these controls, the central claim that the CMF is unbiased and directly comparable to the Salpeter IMF cannot be evaluated.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states consistency with a Salpeter-like slope but does not quote the measured index, uncertainty, or number of cores; adding these values would allow readers to assess the result immediately.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for the CMF plot should explicitly state the fitting range, binning method, and whether the plotted points include completeness corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have prompted us to clarify and strengthen several aspects of the analysis. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (core mass estimation): Core masses are derived from the dust continuum flux via the standard relation M ∝ F_ν D² / (κ_ν B_ν(T_d)). The manuscript adopts a single fixed dust temperature. In 30Dor-10, local heating by O stars creates T_d gradients; warmer low-mass cores would have masses underestimated, preferentially shifting or removing objects from the low-mass end and potentially flattening the fitted high-mass slope. No sensitivity tests with varying T_d or spatially resolved temperature maps are described, leaving the Salpeter consistency dependent on an untested assumption.

Authors: We acknowledge that a fixed dust temperature is an approximation and that local heating from O stars in 30Dor-10 can introduce temperature gradients. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis in which core masses are recomputed for a range of uniform temperatures (15–30 K) as well as a simple two-temperature model that assigns higher T_d to cores projected near known O stars. We will show the resulting CMF slopes and demonstrate that the Salpeter-like index remains consistent within the reported uncertainties. Spatially resolved temperature maps are not available from the current data set; we will explicitly note this limitation and discuss its implications for future work. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (statistical analysis and CMF fitting): The claim of a Salpeter-like slope rests on 'robust statistical analysis,' but the text does not detail the fitting procedure, binning, completeness corrections, or how the sample selection and sensitivity limit at 2000 au affect the low-mass end. Incompleteness below the detection threshold can truncate the distribution and bias the power-law index by several tenths; without these controls, the central claim that the CMF is unbiased and directly comparable to the Salpeter IMF cannot be evaluated.

Authors: We agree that additional methodological detail is required. In the revised Section 5 we will provide a full description of the maximum-likelihood fitting procedure (including the likelihood function and bootstrap error estimation), the adopted binning scheme, the injection-recovery tests used to derive completeness as a function of mass and size, and the precise impact of the 2000 au sensitivity limit on the low-mass end. We will also present the completeness-corrected CMF and show that the recovered power-law index remains consistent with the Salpeter value after these corrections are applied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational CMF fit is data-driven with no self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper reports ALMA observations of 30Dor-10 at 2000 au resolution, core identification via continuum emission, mass estimation from dust flux assuming a fixed dust temperature, and a subsequent power-law fit to the resulting core mass distribution. The central claim that the CMF slope is consistent with Salpeter is the direct numerical outcome of this fitting procedure applied to the measured masses; no equation, ansatz, or self-citation is invoked to force the slope value by construction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a purely observational study; the abstract introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond standard assumptions of core identification and mass estimation in star-forming regions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1147 out tokens · 62242 ms · 2026-05-10T01:44:44.793900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

[1]

& Yorke, H

Zinnecker, H. & Yorke, H. W. Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation. ARA&A45, 481–563 (2007)

work page 2007
[2]

Differences, convergence, and myths.MNRAS(2025)

V´ azquez-Semadeni, E.et al.The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths.MNRAS(2025)

work page 2025
[3]

Csengeri, T., Bontemps, S., Wyrowski, F. & et al. ALMA survey of massive cluster progenitors from ATLASGAL. Limited fragmentation at the early evolutionary stage of massive clumps.A&A600, L10 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

C., Ahmadi, A

Beuther, H., Mottram, J. C., Ahmadi, A. & et al. Fragmentation and disk for- mation during high-mass star formation. IRAM NOEMA (Northern Extended Millimeter Array) large program CORE.A&A617, A100 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

E., Shirley, Y

Svoboda, B. E., Shirley, Y. L., Traficante, A. & et al. ALMA Observations of Fragmentation, Substructure, and Protostars in High-mass Starless Clump Candidates.ApJ886, 36 (2019). 15

work page 2019
[6]

Anderson, M., Peretto, N., Ragan, S. E. & et al. An ALMA study of hub-filament systems - I. On the clump mass concentration within the most massive cores. MNRAS508, 2964–2978 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

M., Avison, A

Traficante, A., Jones, B. M., Avison, A. & et al. The SQUALO project (Star for- mation in QUiescent And Luminous Objects) I: clump-fed accretion mechanism in high-mass star-forming objects.MNRAS520, 2306–2327 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

Xu, F., Wang, K., Liu, T. & et al. The ALMA Survey of Star Formation and Evo- lution in Massive Protoclusters with Blue Profiles (ASSEMBLE): Core Growth, Cluster Contraction, and Primordial Mass Segregation.ApJS270, 9 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

Morii, K., Sanhueza, P., Zhang, Q. & et al. The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). XI. Statistical Study of Early Fragmentation.ApJ966, 171 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Ishihara, K., Sanhueza, P., Nakamura, F. & et al. Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). IV. Fragmentation in High-mass Star-forming Clumps.ApJ974, 95 (2024)

work page 2024
[11]

Louvet, F., Sanhueza, P., Stutz, A. & et al. ALMA-IMF: XV. Core mass function in the high-mass star formation regime.A&A690, A33 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

Coletta, A., Molinari, S., Schisano, E. & et al. ALMAGAL III. Compact source catalog: Fragmentation statistics and physical evolution of the core population. arXiv e-printsarXiv:2503.05663 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Sanhueza, P., Contreras, Y., Wu, B. & et al. The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). I. Pilot Survey: Clump Fragmentation.ApJ886, 102 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Salpeter, E. E. The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.ApJ121, 161 (1955)

work page 1955
[15]

On the variation of the initial mass function.MNRAS322, 231–246 (2001)

Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function.MNRAS322, 231–246 (2001)

work page 2001
[16]

Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function.PASP115, 763–795 (2003)

Chabrier, G. Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function.PASP115, 763–795 (2003)

work page 2003
[17]

Bastian, N., Covey, K. R. & Meyer, M. R. A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations.ARA&A48, 339–389 (2010)

work page 2010
[18]

Kroupa, P., Weidner, C., Pflamm-Altenburg, J. & et al. The Stellar and Sub- Stellar Initial Mass Function of Simple and Composite Populations5, 115 (2013)

work page 2013
[19]

Prisinzano, L., Micela, G., Sciortino, S. & et al. Luminosity and Mass Function of the Galactic open cluster NGC 2422.A&A404, 927–937 (2003). 16

work page 2003
[20]

W., Jr., Lu, J

Hosek, M. W., Jr., Lu, J. R. & et al. The Unusual Initial Mass Function of the Arches Cluster.ApJ870, 44 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

Espinoza, P., Selman, F. J. & Melnick, J. The massive star initial mass function of the Arches cluster.A&A501, 563–583 (2009)

work page 2009
[22]

& Kroupa, P

Banerjee, S. & Kroupa, P. On the true shape of the upper end of the stellar initial mass function. The case of R136.A&A547, A23 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

Schneider, F. R. N., Sana, H., Evans, C. J. & et al. An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst.Science359, 69–71 (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

Marks, M., Kroupa, P., Dabringhausen, J. & et al. Evidence for top-heavy stellar initial mass functions with increasing density and decreasing metallicity.MNRAS 422, 2246–2254 (2012)

work page 2012
[25]

Hennebelle, P., Commer¸ con, B., Lee, Y.-N. & et al. What Is the Role of Stellar Radiative Feedback in Setting the Stellar Mass Spectrum?ApJ904, 194 (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

Hennebelle, P., Lebreuilly, U., Colman, T. & et al. Influence of magnetic field and stellar radiative feedback on the collapse and the stellar mass spectrum of a massive star-forming clump.A&A668, A147 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

& Cole, A

Choudhury, S., Subramaniam, A. & Cole, A. A. Photometric metallicity map of the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS455, 1855–1880 (2016)

work page 2016
[28]

Tanvir, T. S. & Krumholz, M. R. The metallicity dependence of the stellar initial mass function.MNRAS527, 7306–7316 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Gjergo, E.et al.Massive Star Formation at Supersolar Metallicities: Constraints on the Initial Mass Function.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics26, 025003 (2026)

work page 2026
[30]

Offner, S. S. R., Clark, P. C., Hennebelle, P. & et al. Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T. (eds)The Origin and Universality of the Stellar Initial Mass Function. (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.)Protostars and Planets VI, 53–75 (2014). 1312.5326

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[31]

K¨ onyves, V., Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A. & et al. A census of dense cores in the Aquila cloud complex: SPIRE/PACS observations from the Herschel Gould Belt survey.A&A584, A91 (2015)

work page 2015
[32]

Indebetouw, R., Wong, T., Chen, C. H. R. & et al. Structural and Dynamical Analysis of 0.1 pc Cores and Filaments in the 30 Doradus-10 Giant Molecular Cloud.ApJ888, 56 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

& Chabrier, G

Hennebelle, P. & Chabrier, G. Analytical Theory for the Initial Mass Function: CO Clumps and Prestellar Cores.ApJ684, 395–410 (2008). 17

work page 2008
[34]

C., Klessen, R

Clark, P. C., Klessen, R. S. & Bonnell, I. A. Clump lifetimes and the initial mass function.MNRAS379, 57–62 (2007)

work page 2007
[35]

Nu˜ nez-Casti˜ neyra, A., Gonz´ alez, M., Brucy, N. & et al. The interdependence between density PDF, CMF and IMF and their relation with Mach number in simulations.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2412.12809 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A219 (2025)

Nucara, A.et al.The Rosetta Stone project: III. ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A219 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S. & et al. From filamentary clouds to prestellar cores to the stellar IMF: Initial highlights from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey.A&A518, L102 (2010)

work page 2010
[38]

Clark, P. C. & Whitworth, A. P. On the emergent system mass function: the contest between accretion and fragmentation.MNRAS500, 1697–1707 (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

Hopkins, A. M. The Dawes Review 8: Measuring the Stellar Initial Mass Function. PASA35, e039 (2018)

work page 2018
[40]

Molinari, S., Schilke, P., Battersby, C. & et al. ALMAGAL I. The ALMA evolu- tionary study of high-mass protocluster formation in the Galaxy. Presentation of the survey and early results.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2503.05555 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Motte, F., Bontemps, S., Csengeri, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. I. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Introduction to the Large Program and first results.A&A 662, A8 (2022)

work page 2022
[42]

V´ azquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J. & et al. Global hierar- chical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario.MNRAS 490, 3061–3097 (2019)

work page 2019
[43]

Motte, F., Nony, T., Louvet, F. & et al. The unexpectedly large proportion of high-mass star-forming cores in a Galactic mini-starburst.Nature Astronomy2, 478–482 (2018)

work page 2018
[44]

Pouteau, Y., Motte, F., Nony, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. VI. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Core mass function evolution in the W43-MM2&MM3 mini-starburst.A&A674, A76 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

Nony, T., Galv´ an-Madrid, R., Motte, F. & et al. ALMA-IMF. V. Prestellar and protostellar core populations in the W43 cloud complex.A&A674, A75 (2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Armante, M., Gusdorf, A., Louvet, F. & et al. ALMA-IMF. X. The core pop- ulation in the evolved W33-Main (G012.80) protocluster.A&A686, A122 (2024). 18

work page 2024
[47]

Morii, K.et al.The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). XIII. Core Mass Function, Lifetime, and Growth of Prestellar Cores.ApJ997, 155 (2026)

work page 2026
[48]

Johansson, L. E. B., Greve, A., Booth, R. S. & et al. Results of the SEST key programme: CO in the Magellanic Clouds. VII. 30 Doradus and its southern H II regions.A&A331, 857–872 (1998)

work page 1998
[49]

J., Gieles, M

Sabbi, E., Lennon, D. J., Gieles, M. & et al. A Double Cluster at the Core of 30 Doradus.ApJL754, L37 (2012)

work page 2012
[50]

W., Glover, S

Rahner, D., Pellegrini, E. W., Glover, S. C. O. & et al. Forming clusters within clusters: how 30 Doradus recollapsed and gave birth again.MNRAS473, L11–L15 (2018)

work page 2018
[51]

W., Klessen, R

Dom´ ınguez, R., Pellegrini, E. W., Klessen, R. S. & et al. Modelling the formation of two stellar generations in massive star clusters: the case of 30 Doradus.MNRAS 520, 5600–5612 (2023)

work page 2023
[52]

Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C., Chen, C. H. R. & et al. ALMA Resolves 30 Doradus: Sub-parsec Molecular Cloud Structure near the Closest Super Star Cluster.ApJ 774, 73 (2013)

work page 2013
[53]

Indebetouw, R., Wong, T., Madden, S. & et al. A Radial Decrease in Kinetic Temperature Measured with H 2CO in 30 Doradus.ApJ969, 143 (2024)

work page 2024
[54]

Wong, T., Oudshoorn, L., Sofovich, E. & et al. The 30 Doradus Molecular Cloud at 0.4 pc Resolution with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array: Physical Properties and the Boundedness of CO-emitting Structures.ApJ932, 47 (2022)

work page 2022
[55]

& Wilson, C

Brunetti, N. & Wilson, C. D. An ALMA archival study of the clump mass function in the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS483, 1624–1641 (2019)

work page 2019
[56]

Pietrzy´ nski, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A. & et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent.Nature567, 200–203 (2019)

work page 2019
[57]

A., Pineda, J

Traficante, A., Fuller, G. A., Pineda, J. E. & et al. Hyper: Hybrid photometry and extraction routine.A&A574, A119 (2015)

work page 2015
[58]

& Benedettini, M

Traficante, A., De Angelis, F., Nucara, A. & Benedettini, M. Hyper-py: HYbrid Photometry and Extraction Routine in PYthon.https://github.com/Alessio- Traficante/hyper-py(2025)

work page 2025
[59]

A suite of radiative magneto- hydrodynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A217 (2025)

Lebreuilly, U.et al.The Rosetta Stone Project: I. A suite of radiative magneto- hydrodynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A217 (2025). 19

work page 2025
[60]

Tung, N.-D.et al.The Rosetta Stone Project: II. The correlation between star formation efficiency and L/M indicator for the evolutionary stages of star-forming clumps in post-processed radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations.A&A 701, A218 (2025)

work page 2025
[61]

Pouteau, Y., Motte, F., Nony, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. III. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: top-heavy core mass function in the W43-MM2&MM3 mini-starburst.A&A664, A26 (2022)

work page 2022
[62]

Cunningham, N., Ginsburg, A., Galv´ an-Madrid, R. & et al. ALMA-IMF. VII. First release of the full spectral line cubes: Core kinematics traced by DCN J = (3−2).A&A678, A194 (2023)

work page 2023
[63]

W., Dib, S

Zhou, J. W., Dib, S. & Kroupa, P. The Star Formation Histories, Star Formation Efficiencies and Ionizing Sources of ATLASGAL Clumps with H II Regions.PASP 136, 094302 (2024)

work page 2024
[64]

& Kroupa, P

Yan, Z., Jerabkova, T. & Kroupa, P. The most massive stars in very young star clusters with a limited mass: Evidence favours significant self-regulation in the star formation processes.A&A670, A151 (2023)

work page 2023
[65]

Kroupa, P., Gjergo, E., Jerabkova, T. & et al. The initial mass function of stars. arXiv e-printsarXiv:2410.07311 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

Hacar, A.et al.Inutsuka, S., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M. (eds)Initial Conditions for Star Formation: a Physical Description of the Filamentary ISM. (eds Inutsuka, S., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M.)Protostars and Planets VII, Vol. 534 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 153 (2023). 2203.09562

work page arXiv 2023
[67]

& Neri, R

Motte, F., Andre, P. & Neri, R. The initial conditions of star formation in the rho Ophiuchi main cloud: wide-field millimeter continuum mapping.A&A336, 150–172 (1998)

work page 1998
[68]

Schneider, F. R. N., Ram´ ırez-Agudelo, O. H., Tramper, F. & et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XXIX. Massive star formation in the local 30 Doradus starburst.A&A618, A73 (2018)

work page 2018
[69]

& Terlevich, R

Selman, F., Melnick, J., Bosch, G. & Terlevich, R. The ionizing cluster of 30 Doradus. III. Star-formation history and initial mass function.A&A347, 532–549 (1999)

work page 1999
[70]

A.et al.The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Tele- scope/STIS

Crowther, P. A.et al.The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Tele- scope/STIS. I. Far-ultraviolet spectroscopic census and the origin of He IIλ1640 in young star clusters.MNRAS458, 624–659 (2016). 20

work page 2016
[71]

Li, S.et al.Observations of high-order multiplicity in a high-mass stellar protocluster.Nature Astronomy8, 472–481 (2024)

work page 2024
[72]

R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C

Hunter, T. R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C. L. & et al. The ALMA Interferometric Pipeline Heuristics.PASP135, 074501 (2023)

work page 2023
[73]

CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy.PASP134, 114501 (2022)

CASA Team & et al. CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy.PASP134, 114501 (2022)

work page 2022
[74]

E., Zhao, B

Caselli, P., Pineda, J. E., Zhao, B. & et al. The Central 1000 au of a Pre-stellar Core Revealed with ALMA. I. 1.3 mm Continuum Observations.ApJ874, 89 (2019)

work page 2019
[75]

Tokuda, K., Fujishiro, K., Tachihara, K. & et al. FRagmentation and Evolution of Dense Cores Judged by ALMA (FREJA). I. Overview: Inner∼1000 au Structures of Prestellar/Protostellar Cores in Taurus.ApJ899, 10 (2020)

work page 2020
[76]

Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., Chastenet, J. & et al. Dust Abundance Variations in the Magellanic Clouds: Probing the Life-cycle of Metals with All-sky Surveys. ApJ841, 72 (2017)

work page 2017
[77]

Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Cirasuolo, M. & et al. The KLEVER Survey: spatially resolved metallicity maps and gradients in a sample of 1.2 ¡ z ¡ 2.5 lensed galaxies. MNRAS492, 821–842 (2020)

work page 2020
[78]

Lah, P., Colless, M., D’Eugenio, F. & et al. Emission-line velocity, metallicity, and extinction maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS529, 2611–2626 (2024)

work page 2024
[79]

& Henning, T

Ossenkopf, V. & Henning, T. Dust opacities for protostellar cores.A&A291, 943–959 (1994)

work page 1994
[80]

D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C

Gordon, K. D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C. & et al. Dust and Gas in the Mag- ellanic Clouds from the HERITAGE Herschel Key Project. I. Dust Properties and Insights into the Origin of the Submillimeter Excess Emission.ApJ797, 85 (2014)

work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

& Yorke, H

Zinnecker, H. & Yorke, H. W. Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation. ARA&A45, 481–563 (2007)

work page 2007

[2] [2]

Differences, convergence, and myths.MNRAS(2025)

V´ azquez-Semadeni, E.et al.The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths.MNRAS(2025)

work page 2025

[3] [3]

Csengeri, T., Bontemps, S., Wyrowski, F. & et al. ALMA survey of massive cluster progenitors from ATLASGAL. Limited fragmentation at the early evolutionary stage of massive clumps.A&A600, L10 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [4]

C., Ahmadi, A

Beuther, H., Mottram, J. C., Ahmadi, A. & et al. Fragmentation and disk for- mation during high-mass star formation. IRAM NOEMA (Northern Extended Millimeter Array) large program CORE.A&A617, A100 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

E., Shirley, Y

Svoboda, B. E., Shirley, Y. L., Traficante, A. & et al. ALMA Observations of Fragmentation, Substructure, and Protostars in High-mass Starless Clump Candidates.ApJ886, 36 (2019). 15

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Anderson, M., Peretto, N., Ragan, S. E. & et al. An ALMA study of hub-filament systems - I. On the clump mass concentration within the most massive cores. MNRAS508, 2964–2978 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

M., Avison, A

Traficante, A., Jones, B. M., Avison, A. & et al. The SQUALO project (Star for- mation in QUiescent And Luminous Objects) I: clump-fed accretion mechanism in high-mass star-forming objects.MNRAS520, 2306–2327 (2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Xu, F., Wang, K., Liu, T. & et al. The ALMA Survey of Star Formation and Evo- lution in Massive Protoclusters with Blue Profiles (ASSEMBLE): Core Growth, Cluster Contraction, and Primordial Mass Segregation.ApJS270, 9 (2024)

work page 2024

[9] [9]

Morii, K., Sanhueza, P., Zhang, Q. & et al. The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). XI. Statistical Study of Early Fragmentation.ApJ966, 171 (2024)

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Ishihara, K., Sanhueza, P., Nakamura, F. & et al. Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). IV. Fragmentation in High-mass Star-forming Clumps.ApJ974, 95 (2024)

work page 2024

[11] [11]

Louvet, F., Sanhueza, P., Stutz, A. & et al. ALMA-IMF: XV. Core mass function in the high-mass star formation regime.A&A690, A33 (2024)

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Coletta, A., Molinari, S., Schisano, E. & et al. ALMAGAL III. Compact source catalog: Fragmentation statistics and physical evolution of the core population. arXiv e-printsarXiv:2503.05663 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[13] [13]

Sanhueza, P., Contreras, Y., Wu, B. & et al. The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). I. Pilot Survey: Clump Fragmentation.ApJ886, 102 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Salpeter, E. E. The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.ApJ121, 161 (1955)

work page 1955

[15] [15]

On the variation of the initial mass function.MNRAS322, 231–246 (2001)

Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function.MNRAS322, 231–246 (2001)

work page 2001

[16] [16]

Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function.PASP115, 763–795 (2003)

Chabrier, G. Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function.PASP115, 763–795 (2003)

work page 2003

[17] [17]

Bastian, N., Covey, K. R. & Meyer, M. R. A Universal Stellar Initial Mass Function? A Critical Look at Variations.ARA&A48, 339–389 (2010)

work page 2010

[18] [18]

Kroupa, P., Weidner, C., Pflamm-Altenburg, J. & et al. The Stellar and Sub- Stellar Initial Mass Function of Simple and Composite Populations5, 115 (2013)

work page 2013

[19] [19]

Prisinzano, L., Micela, G., Sciortino, S. & et al. Luminosity and Mass Function of the Galactic open cluster NGC 2422.A&A404, 927–937 (2003). 16

work page 2003

[20] [20]

W., Jr., Lu, J

Hosek, M. W., Jr., Lu, J. R. & et al. The Unusual Initial Mass Function of the Arches Cluster.ApJ870, 44 (2019)

work page 2019

[21] [21]

Espinoza, P., Selman, F. J. & Melnick, J. The massive star initial mass function of the Arches cluster.A&A501, 563–583 (2009)

work page 2009

[22] [22]

& Kroupa, P

Banerjee, S. & Kroupa, P. On the true shape of the upper end of the stellar initial mass function. The case of R136.A&A547, A23 (2012)

work page 2012

[23] [23]

Schneider, F. R. N., Sana, H., Evans, C. J. & et al. An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst.Science359, 69–71 (2018)

work page 2018

[24] [24]

Marks, M., Kroupa, P., Dabringhausen, J. & et al. Evidence for top-heavy stellar initial mass functions with increasing density and decreasing metallicity.MNRAS 422, 2246–2254 (2012)

work page 2012

[25] [25]

Hennebelle, P., Commer¸ con, B., Lee, Y.-N. & et al. What Is the Role of Stellar Radiative Feedback in Setting the Stellar Mass Spectrum?ApJ904, 194 (2020)

work page 2020

[26] [26]

Hennebelle, P., Lebreuilly, U., Colman, T. & et al. Influence of magnetic field and stellar radiative feedback on the collapse and the stellar mass spectrum of a massive star-forming clump.A&A668, A147 (2022)

work page 2022

[27] [27]

& Cole, A

Choudhury, S., Subramaniam, A. & Cole, A. A. Photometric metallicity map of the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS455, 1855–1880 (2016)

work page 2016

[28] [28]

Tanvir, T. S. & Krumholz, M. R. The metallicity dependence of the stellar initial mass function.MNRAS527, 7306–7316 (2024)

work page 2024

[29] [29]

Gjergo, E.et al.Massive Star Formation at Supersolar Metallicities: Constraints on the Initial Mass Function.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics26, 025003 (2026)

work page 2026

[30] [30]

Offner, S. S. R., Clark, P. C., Hennebelle, P. & et al. Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T. (eds)The Origin and Universality of the Stellar Initial Mass Function. (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.)Protostars and Planets VI, 53–75 (2014). 1312.5326

work page Pith review arXiv 2014

[31] [31]

K¨ onyves, V., Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A. & et al. A census of dense cores in the Aquila cloud complex: SPIRE/PACS observations from the Herschel Gould Belt survey.A&A584, A91 (2015)

work page 2015

[32] [32]

Indebetouw, R., Wong, T., Chen, C. H. R. & et al. Structural and Dynamical Analysis of 0.1 pc Cores and Filaments in the 30 Doradus-10 Giant Molecular Cloud.ApJ888, 56 (2020)

work page 2020

[33] [33]

& Chabrier, G

Hennebelle, P. & Chabrier, G. Analytical Theory for the Initial Mass Function: CO Clumps and Prestellar Cores.ApJ684, 395–410 (2008). 17

work page 2008

[34] [34]

C., Klessen, R

Clark, P. C., Klessen, R. S. & Bonnell, I. A. Clump lifetimes and the initial mass function.MNRAS379, 57–62 (2007)

work page 2007

[35] [35]

Nu˜ nez-Casti˜ neyra, A., Gonz´ alez, M., Brucy, N. & et al. The interdependence between density PDF, CMF and IMF and their relation with Mach number in simulations.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2412.12809 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024

[36] [36]

ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A219 (2025)

Nucara, A.et al.The Rosetta Stone project: III. ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A219 (2025)

work page 2025

[37] [37]

Andr´ e, P., Men’shchikov, A., Bontemps, S. & et al. From filamentary clouds to prestellar cores to the stellar IMF: Initial highlights from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey.A&A518, L102 (2010)

work page 2010

[38] [38]

Clark, P. C. & Whitworth, A. P. On the emergent system mass function: the contest between accretion and fragmentation.MNRAS500, 1697–1707 (2021)

work page 2021

[39] [39]

Hopkins, A. M. The Dawes Review 8: Measuring the Stellar Initial Mass Function. PASA35, e039 (2018)

work page 2018

[40] [40]

Molinari, S., Schilke, P., Battersby, C. & et al. ALMAGAL I. The ALMA evolu- tionary study of high-mass protocluster formation in the Galaxy. Presentation of the survey and early results.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2503.05555 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[41] [41]

Motte, F., Bontemps, S., Csengeri, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. I. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Introduction to the Large Program and first results.A&A 662, A8 (2022)

work page 2022

[42] [42]

V´ azquez-Semadeni, E., Palau, A., Ballesteros-Paredes, J. & et al. Global hierar- chical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario.MNRAS 490, 3061–3097 (2019)

work page 2019

[43] [43]

Motte, F., Nony, T., Louvet, F. & et al. The unexpectedly large proportion of high-mass star-forming cores in a Galactic mini-starburst.Nature Astronomy2, 478–482 (2018)

work page 2018

[44] [44]

Pouteau, Y., Motte, F., Nony, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. VI. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Core mass function evolution in the W43-MM2&MM3 mini-starburst.A&A674, A76 (2023)

work page 2023

[45] [45]

Nony, T., Galv´ an-Madrid, R., Motte, F. & et al. ALMA-IMF. V. Prestellar and protostellar core populations in the W43 cloud complex.A&A674, A75 (2023)

work page 2023

[46] [46]

Armante, M., Gusdorf, A., Louvet, F. & et al. ALMA-IMF. X. The core pop- ulation in the evolved W33-Main (G012.80) protocluster.A&A686, A122 (2024). 18

work page 2024

[47] [47]

Morii, K.et al.The ALMA Survey of 70µm Dark High-mass Clumps in Early Stages (ASHES). XIII. Core Mass Function, Lifetime, and Growth of Prestellar Cores.ApJ997, 155 (2026)

work page 2026

[48] [48]

Johansson, L. E. B., Greve, A., Booth, R. S. & et al. Results of the SEST key programme: CO in the Magellanic Clouds. VII. 30 Doradus and its southern H II regions.A&A331, 857–872 (1998)

work page 1998

[49] [49]

J., Gieles, M

Sabbi, E., Lennon, D. J., Gieles, M. & et al. A Double Cluster at the Core of 30 Doradus.ApJL754, L37 (2012)

work page 2012

[50] [50]

W., Glover, S

Rahner, D., Pellegrini, E. W., Glover, S. C. O. & et al. Forming clusters within clusters: how 30 Doradus recollapsed and gave birth again.MNRAS473, L11–L15 (2018)

work page 2018

[51] [51]

W., Klessen, R

Dom´ ınguez, R., Pellegrini, E. W., Klessen, R. S. & et al. Modelling the formation of two stellar generations in massive star clusters: the case of 30 Doradus.MNRAS 520, 5600–5612 (2023)

work page 2023

[52] [52]

Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C., Chen, C. H. R. & et al. ALMA Resolves 30 Doradus: Sub-parsec Molecular Cloud Structure near the Closest Super Star Cluster.ApJ 774, 73 (2013)

work page 2013

[53] [53]

Indebetouw, R., Wong, T., Madden, S. & et al. A Radial Decrease in Kinetic Temperature Measured with H 2CO in 30 Doradus.ApJ969, 143 (2024)

work page 2024

[54] [54]

Wong, T., Oudshoorn, L., Sofovich, E. & et al. The 30 Doradus Molecular Cloud at 0.4 pc Resolution with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array: Physical Properties and the Boundedness of CO-emitting Structures.ApJ932, 47 (2022)

work page 2022

[55] [55]

& Wilson, C

Brunetti, N. & Wilson, C. D. An ALMA archival study of the clump mass function in the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS483, 1624–1641 (2019)

work page 2019

[56] [56]

Pietrzy´ nski, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A. & et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent.Nature567, 200–203 (2019)

work page 2019

[57] [57]

A., Pineda, J

Traficante, A., Fuller, G. A., Pineda, J. E. & et al. Hyper: Hybrid photometry and extraction routine.A&A574, A119 (2015)

work page 2015

[58] [58]

& Benedettini, M

Traficante, A., De Angelis, F., Nucara, A. & Benedettini, M. Hyper-py: HYbrid Photometry and Extraction Routine in PYthon.https://github.com/Alessio- Traficante/hyper-py(2025)

work page 2025

[59] [59]

A suite of radiative magneto- hydrodynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A217 (2025)

Lebreuilly, U.et al.The Rosetta Stone Project: I. A suite of radiative magneto- hydrodynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.A&A701, A217 (2025). 19

work page 2025

[60] [60]

Tung, N.-D.et al.The Rosetta Stone Project: II. The correlation between star formation efficiency and L/M indicator for the evolutionary stages of star-forming clumps in post-processed radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations.A&A 701, A218 (2025)

work page 2025

[61] [61]

Pouteau, Y., Motte, F., Nony, T. & et al. ALMA-IMF. III. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: top-heavy core mass function in the W43-MM2&MM3 mini-starburst.A&A664, A26 (2022)

work page 2022

[62] [62]

Cunningham, N., Ginsburg, A., Galv´ an-Madrid, R. & et al. ALMA-IMF. VII. First release of the full spectral line cubes: Core kinematics traced by DCN J = (3−2).A&A678, A194 (2023)

work page 2023

[63] [63]

W., Dib, S

Zhou, J. W., Dib, S. & Kroupa, P. The Star Formation Histories, Star Formation Efficiencies and Ionizing Sources of ATLASGAL Clumps with H II Regions.PASP 136, 094302 (2024)

work page 2024

[64] [64]

& Kroupa, P

Yan, Z., Jerabkova, T. & Kroupa, P. The most massive stars in very young star clusters with a limited mass: Evidence favours significant self-regulation in the star formation processes.A&A670, A151 (2023)

work page 2023

[65] [65]

Kroupa, P., Gjergo, E., Jerabkova, T. & et al. The initial mass function of stars. arXiv e-printsarXiv:2410.07311 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024

[66] [66]

Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

Hacar, A.et al.Inutsuka, S., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M. (eds)Initial Conditions for Star Formation: a Physical Description of the Filamentary ISM. (eds Inutsuka, S., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M.)Protostars and Planets VII, Vol. 534 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 153 (2023). 2203.09562

work page arXiv 2023

[67] [67]

& Neri, R

Motte, F., Andre, P. & Neri, R. The initial conditions of star formation in the rho Ophiuchi main cloud: wide-field millimeter continuum mapping.A&A336, 150–172 (1998)

work page 1998

[68] [68]

Schneider, F. R. N., Ram´ ırez-Agudelo, O. H., Tramper, F. & et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XXIX. Massive star formation in the local 30 Doradus starburst.A&A618, A73 (2018)

work page 2018

[69] [69]

& Terlevich, R

Selman, F., Melnick, J., Bosch, G. & Terlevich, R. The ionizing cluster of 30 Doradus. III. Star-formation history and initial mass function.A&A347, 532–549 (1999)

work page 1999

[70] [70]

A.et al.The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Tele- scope/STIS

Crowther, P. A.et al.The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Tele- scope/STIS. I. Far-ultraviolet spectroscopic census and the origin of He IIλ1640 in young star clusters.MNRAS458, 624–659 (2016). 20

work page 2016

[71] [71]

Li, S.et al.Observations of high-order multiplicity in a high-mass stellar protocluster.Nature Astronomy8, 472–481 (2024)

work page 2024

[72] [72]

R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C

Hunter, T. R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C. L. & et al. The ALMA Interferometric Pipeline Heuristics.PASP135, 074501 (2023)

work page 2023

[73] [73]

CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy.PASP134, 114501 (2022)

CASA Team & et al. CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy.PASP134, 114501 (2022)

work page 2022

[74] [74]

E., Zhao, B

Caselli, P., Pineda, J. E., Zhao, B. & et al. The Central 1000 au of a Pre-stellar Core Revealed with ALMA. I. 1.3 mm Continuum Observations.ApJ874, 89 (2019)

work page 2019

[75] [75]

Tokuda, K., Fujishiro, K., Tachihara, K. & et al. FRagmentation and Evolution of Dense Cores Judged by ALMA (FREJA). I. Overview: Inner∼1000 au Structures of Prestellar/Protostellar Cores in Taurus.ApJ899, 10 (2020)

work page 2020

[76] [76]

Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., Chastenet, J. & et al. Dust Abundance Variations in the Magellanic Clouds: Probing the Life-cycle of Metals with All-sky Surveys. ApJ841, 72 (2017)

work page 2017

[77] [77]

Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Cirasuolo, M. & et al. The KLEVER Survey: spatially resolved metallicity maps and gradients in a sample of 1.2 ¡ z ¡ 2.5 lensed galaxies. MNRAS492, 821–842 (2020)

work page 2020

[78] [78]

Lah, P., Colless, M., D’Eugenio, F. & et al. Emission-line velocity, metallicity, and extinction maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud.MNRAS529, 2611–2626 (2024)

work page 2024

[79] [79]

& Henning, T

Ossenkopf, V. & Henning, T. Dust opacities for protostellar cores.A&A291, 943–959 (1994)

work page 1994

[80] [80]

D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C

Gordon, K. D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C. & et al. Dust and Gas in the Mag- ellanic Clouds from the HERITAGE Herschel Key Project. I. Dust Properties and Insights into the Origin of the Submillimeter Excess Emission.ApJ797, 85 (2014)

work page 2014