pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20084 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.optics

6.2-GW tabletop attosecond light source

Lihui Meng , Lu Xu , Xusheng Zhu , Lixin He , Zan Nie , Pengfei Lan , Peixiang Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords attosecond pulse generationtabletop attosecond sourcehigh peak powertwo-color laser synthesizermacroscopic phase-matchingcarrier-envelope phase stabilizationisolated attosecond pulsesattosecond nonlinear metrology
0
0 comments X

The pith

A tabletop two-color synthesizer with loose focusing generates 6.2-GW isolated attosecond pulses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that high-energy isolated attosecond pulses can be produced on a tabletop by merging a powerful few-cycle two-color laser with conditions for macroscopic phase-matching. This addresses the long-standing issue of low peak power limiting advanced attosecond applications. Achieving 1.64 microjoules and 263 attoseconds at 6.2 gigawatts peak power would enable nonlinear experiments and metrology that require intense attosecond fields. The system uses carrier-envelope phase stabilization and active delay synchronization to maintain reliability.

Core claim

The central claim is the generation of isolated attosecond pulses with 1.64 uJ energy, 263 as duration, and 6.2 GW peak power—the highest for any tabletop isolated attosecond source—through a 2.1 TW two-color few-cycle synthesizer and loose focusing geometry that supports macroscopic phase-matching, with built-in CEP stabilization and synchronized two-color delay.

What carries the argument

The two-color synthesizer with stabilized carrier-envelope phase and actively synchronized relative time delay, used together with loose focusing geometry to enable macroscopic phase-matching.

If this is right

  • This robust source enables nonlinear effect experiments previously inaccessible with lower-power isolated attosecond pulses.
  • It establishes a foundation for advanced attosecond spectroscopy and nonlinear metrology.
  • The high stability supports reproducible high-power attosecond measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported power levels suggest potential for attosecond nonlinear optics in regimes requiring stronger fields than before.
  • Scaling this approach could lead to even higher pulse energies by adjusting laser parameters or focusing conditions.
  • Such sources may facilitate time-resolved studies of electron dynamics at intensities approaching those of larger facilities but in a compact setup.

Load-bearing premise

The stabilized carrier-envelope phase, actively synchronized two-color delay, and loose focusing geometry together produce the macroscopic phase-matching required for the reported high energy and isolated attosecond character.

What would settle it

Observation of pulse energies significantly below 1.64 microjoules or evidence from spectral or temporal measurements that the attosecond emission consists of a train rather than an isolated pulse would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20084 by Lihui Meng, Lixin He, Lu Xu, Peixiang Lu, Pengfei Lan, Xusheng Zhu, Zan Nie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup for the generation of GW-class IAPs. a, Terawatt few-cycle two-color synthesizer. BBO, β-barium borate; PZT, piezo-transducer-actuated stage; CM, chirped mirror; DM, dichroic mirror; FM, focusing mirror. b, SHG-FROG characterization of the output pulse from the cascaded post-compressor. Measured (top left) and retrieved (top right) SHG-FROG traces. Bottom left: Retrieved spectrum (red so… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The generation of attosecond pulses (1 as=10-18 s) has enabled real-time observation and manipulation of coherent electron dynamics, yet their low peak power has hindered the development of advanced attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy and attosecond nonlinear metrology. Here we overcome this limitation by generating 1.64 uJ, 263 as isolated attosecond pulses with a peak power of 6.2 GW, the highest pulse energy and peak power reported for a tabletop isolated attosecond source. This is achieved by combining a 2.1 TW, few-cycle (8.3 fs) two-color synthesizer with a loose focusing geometry that enables macroscopic phase-matching. The synthesizer features a stabilized carrier-envelope phase and an actively synchronized relative time delay between the two-color channels, ensuring high stability and reproducibility. This robust tabletop attosecond source enables nonlinear effect experiments that were previously inaccessible with lower-power IAPs, establishing a foundation for advanced attosecond spectroscopy and nonlinear metrology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the experimental generation of isolated attosecond pulses with energy 1.64 μJ, duration 263 as, and peak power 6.2 GW—the highest reported for a tabletop isolated attosecond source—using a 2.1 TW, 8.3 fs two-color few-cycle synthesizer with stabilized carrier-envelope phase and actively synchronized inter-color delay, focused loosely into a gas target to achieve macroscopic phase-matching.

Significance. If the central measurements hold, the result would constitute a notable advance by raising the available peak power of tabletop isolated attosecond pulses by roughly an order of magnitude, thereby opening previously inaccessible regimes of attosecond nonlinear optics and pump-probe metrology.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results / Methods (phase-matching discussion)] The central claim that the combination of the 2.1 TW two-color field, CEP stabilization, active delay lock, and loose-focusing geometry produces the required macroscopic phase-matching for both 1.64 μJ yield and isolated attosecond character is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative evaluation (coherence length, phase-mismatch parameter Δk, or effective interaction length relative to the confocal parameter) that would demonstrate these two outcomes can be obtained simultaneously.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract presents numerical values (energy, duration, peak power) without error bars, statistical details, or reference to supporting figures or tables.
  2. [Results] Pulse characterization (e.g., streaking traces, spectral phase retrieval, or isolation verification) is asserted but not described with sufficient experimental parameters to allow independent assessment of possible artifacts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Methods (phase-matching discussion)] The central claim that the combination of the 2.1 TW two-color field, CEP stabilization, active delay lock, and loose-focusing geometry produces the required macroscopic phase-matching for both 1.64 μJ yield and isolated attosecond character is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative evaluation (coherence length, phase-mismatch parameter Δk, or effective interaction length relative to the confocal parameter) that would demonstrate these two outcomes can be obtained simultaneously.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit quantitative discussion of the phase-matching conditions. Although the experimental results (high yield together with isolated character) already indicate that macroscopic phase-matching is achieved, we acknowledge the value of supporting calculations. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph to the Methods section that provides estimates of the coherence length and phase-mismatch parameter Δk based on the known gas dispersion, the two-color field intensities, and the loose-focusing geometry. We also relate the effective interaction length (gas-cell length) to the confocal parameter. These additions demonstrate that the reported conditions permit both the observed 1.64 μJ yield and the preservation of temporal isolation. The revised text is included in the updated submission. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure experimental measurement report

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental result: generation of 1.64 μJ, 263 as isolated attosecond pulses at 6.2 GW peak power using a 2.1 TW two-color synthesizer with CEP stabilization, active delay synchronization, and loose focusing into a gas target. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or theoretical predictions are advanced that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on measured outputs (pulse energy, duration, isolation) rather than any self-referential chain. Phase-matching is invoked as an enabling condition but is not derived or predicted from prior self-citations; it is treated as an empirical outcome of the stated geometry and synchronization. This is a standard experimental optics report with no load-bearing self-definition, fitted-input prediction, or uniqueness theorem that loops back to the authors' own prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration relying on standard nonlinear optics principles; no new entities or derivation parameters are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stabilized carrier-envelope phase and synchronized two-color delay enable stable macroscopic phase-matching in loose focusing geometry
    Invoked to explain the high energy, isolation, and reproducibility of the attosecond pulses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1181 out tokens · 46905 ms · 2026-05-09T22:54:26.144497+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Attosecond metrology,

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, “Attosecond metrology,” Nature 414, 509-513 (2001)

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation,

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, “Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation,” Science 292, 1689-1692 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Real-time observation of valence electron motion,

    E. Goulielmakis, Z.-H. Loh, A. Wirth, R. Santra, N. Rohringer, V. S. Yakovlev, S. Zherebtsov, T. Pfeifer, A. M. Azzeer, M. F. Kling, S. R. Leone, and F. Krausz, “Real-time observation of valence electron motion,” Nature 466, 739-743 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Electron localization following attosecond molecular photoionization

    G. Sansone, F. Kelkensberg, J. F. Pérez-Torres, F. Morales, M. F. Kling, W. Siu, O. Ghafur, P. Johnsson, M. Swoboda, E. Benedetti, F. Ferrari, F. Lépine, J. L. Sanz-Vicario, S. Zherebtsov, I. Znakovskaya, A. L’Huillier, M. Yu. Ivanov, M. Nisoli, F. Martín, and M. J. J. Vrakking, “Electron localization following attosecond molecular photoionization” Nature...

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Attosecond dynamical Franz-Keldysh effect in polycrystalline diamond,

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, A. Ludwig, J. Herrmann, M. Volkov, L. Kasmi, Y. Shinohara, K. Yabana, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Attosecond dynamical Franz-Keldysh effect in polycrystalline diamond,” Science 353, 916-919 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Attosecond spectroscopy of liquid water,

    I. Jordan, M. Huppert, D. Rattenbacher, M. Peper, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, A. von Conta, A. Schild, and H.J. Wörner, “Attosecond spectroscopy of liquid water,” Science 369, 974-979 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields,

    A. Baltuška, T. Udem, M. Uiberacker, M. Hentschel, E. Goulielmakis, C. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, V. S. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, T. W. Hänsch, and F. Krausz, “Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields,” Nature 421, 611-615 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses,

    G. Sansone, E. Benedetti, F. Calegari, C. Vozzi, L. Avaldi, R. Flammini, L. Poletto, P. Villoresi, C. Altucci, R. Velotta, S. Stagira, S. De Silvestri, and M. Nisoli, “Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses,” Science 314, 443-446 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Double optical gating of high-order harmonic generation with carrier-envelope phase stabilized lasers,

    H. Mashiko, S. Gilbertson, C. Li, S. D. Khan, M. M. Shakya, E. Moon, and Z. Chang, “Double optical gating of high-order harmonic generation with carrier-envelope phase stabilized lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 103906 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Isolated sub-100-attosecond pulse generation via controlling electron dynamics

    P. Lan, P. Lu, W. Cao, Y. Li, and X. Wang, “Isolated sub-100-attosecond pulse generation via controlling electron dynamics.” Phys. Rev. A 76, 011402(R) (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Generation of an extreme ultraviolet supercontinuum in a two-color laser field,

    Z. Zeng, Y. Cheng, X. Song, R. Li, and Z. Xu, “Generation of an extreme ultraviolet supercontinuum in a two-color laser field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 203901 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Isolated attosecond pulses using a two-color laser field,

    H. Merdji, T. Auguste, W. Boutu, J. P. Caumes, B. Carré, T. Pfeifer, A. Jullien, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, “Isolated attosecond pulses using a two-color laser field,” Opt. Lett. 32, 3134-3136 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    53-attosecond X-ray pulses reach the carbon K-edge,

    J. Li, X. Ren, Y. Yin, K. Zhao, A. Chew, Y. Cheng, E. Cunningham, Y. Wang, S. Hu, Y. Wu, M. Chini, and Z. Chang, “53-attosecond X-ray pulses reach the carbon K-edge,” Nat. Commun. 8, 186 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Streaking of 43-attosecond soft-X-ray pulses generated by a passively CEP-stable mid-infrared driver,

    T. Gaumnitz, A. Jain, Y. Pertot, M. Huppert, I. Jordan, F. Ardana-Lamas, and H. J. Wörner, “Streaking of 43-attosecond soft-X-ray pulses generated by a passively CEP-stable mid-infrared driver,” Opt. Express 25, 27506-27518 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Ultrashort Isolated Attosecond Pulse Generation with 750- nm Free-Carrier Envelope Phase Near-Infrared Pulses,

    X. Wang, F. Xiao, J. Wang, L. Wang, B. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Zhao, and Z. Zhao, “Ultrashort Isolated Attosecond Pulse Generation with 750- nm Free-Carrier Envelope Phase Near-Infrared Pulses,” Ultrafast Sci. 4, 0080 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Bright 25- attosecond light pulses reach the one atomic unit of time,

    J. Gao, M. Hasan, H. Liang, M.-S. Tsai, Y. Yuan, Z. Eisenhutt, C. H. Keitel, C.-D. Lin, Y. Liu, M.-C. Chen, and M. Han, “Bright 25- attosecond light pulses reach the one atomic unit of time,” arXiv:2508.14774 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Brilliant source of 19.2-attosecond soft X-ray pulses below the atomic unit of time,

    F. Ardana-Lamas, S. L. Cousin, J. Lignieres, and J. Biegert, “Brilliant source of 19.2-attosecond soft X-ray pulses below the atomic unit of time,” Ultrafast Sci. 5, 0128 (2025). 12

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Compact realization of all-attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy,

    M. Kretschmar, E. Svirplys, M. Volkov, T. Witting, T. Nagy, M. J. J. Vrakking, and B. Schütte, “Compact realization of all-attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy,” Sci. Adv. 10, eadk9605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Attosecond-pump attosecond-probe x-ray spectroscopy of liquid water,

    S. Li, L. Lu, and S. Bhattacharyya, “Attosecond-pump attosecond-probe x-ray spectroscopy of liquid water,” Science 383, 1118-1122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Terawatt- attosecond hard X-ray free-electron laser at high repetition rate,

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, N. Mirian, and G. Geloni, “Terawatt- attosecond hard X-ray free-electron laser at high repetition rate,” Nat. Photonics 18, 1293-1298 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Progress on table-top isolated attosecond light sources,

    K. Midorikawa, “Progress on table-top isolated attosecond light sources,” Nat. Photonics 16, 267-278 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Sub-cycle millijoule-level parametric waveform synthesizer for attosecond science,

    G. M. Rossi, R. E. Mainz, Y. Yang, F. Scheiba, M. A. Silva-Toledo, S. Chia, P. D. Keathley, S. Fang, O. D. Mücke, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, G. Cirmi, and F. X. Kärtner, “Sub-cycle millijoule-level parametric waveform synthesizer for attosecond science,” Nat. Photonics 14, 629-635 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Attosecond nonlinear optics using gigawatt-scale isolated attosecond pulses,

    E. J. Takahashi, P. Lan, O. D. Mücke, Y. Nabekawa, and K. Midorikawa, “Attosecond nonlinear optics using gigawatt-scale isolated attosecond pulses,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2691 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Fully stabilized multi-TW optical waveform synthesizer: toward gigawatt isolated attosecond pulses,

    B. Xue, Y. Tamaru, Y. Fu, H. Yuan, P. Lan, O. D. Mücke, A. Suda, K. Midorikawa, and E. J. Takahashi, “Fully stabilized multi-TW optical waveform synthesizer: toward gigawatt isolated attosecond pulses,” Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Gigawatt-class, tabletop, isolated-attosecond-pulse light source,

    B. Xue, K. Midorikawa, and E. J. Takahashi, “Gigawatt-class, tabletop, isolated-attosecond-pulse light source,” Optica 9, 360-363 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Optimizing High Harmonic Generation in Absorbing Gases: Model and Experiment,

    E. Constant, D. Garzella, P. Breger, E. Mével, Ch. Dorrer, C. Le Blanc, F. Salin, and P. Agostini, “Optimizing High Harmonic Generation in Absorbing Gases: Model and Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1668 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    Controlling the carrier-envelope phase of ultrashort light pulses with optical parametric amplifiers,

    A. Baltuška, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, “Controlling the carrier-envelope phase of ultrashort light pulses with optical parametric amplifiers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 133901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    Generation of highly coherent submicrojoule soft x rays by high-order harmonics,

    E. Takahashi, Y. Nabekawa, T. Otsuka, M. Obara, and K. Midorikawa, “Generation of highly coherent submicrojoule soft x rays by high-order harmonics,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 021802(R) (2002)

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Scale-invariant nonlinear optics in gases,

    C. M. Heyl, H. Coudert-Alteirac, M. Miranda, M. Louisy, K. Kovacs, V. Tosa, E. Balogh, K. Varjú, A. L'Huillier, A. Couairon, and C. L. Arnold, “Scale-invariant nonlinear optics in gases,” Optica 3, 75-81 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,

    P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994-1997 (1993)

    work page 1994

  31. [31]

    Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field,

    M. Ammosov, N. Delone, and V. Krainov, “Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field,” Sov. Phys. JETP 64, 1191 (1986)

    work page 1986

  32. [32]

    All-optical frequency-resolved optical gating for isolated attosecond pulse reconstruction,

    Z. Yang, W. Cao, X. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Mo, H. Xu, K. Mi, Q. Zhang, P. Lan, and P. Lu, “All-optical frequency-resolved optical gating for isolated attosecond pulse reconstruction,” Opt. Lett. 45, 567-570 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Perturbed three-channel waveform synthesizer for efficient isolated attosecond pulse generation and characterization,

    D. Dong, H. Wang, B. Xue, K. Imasaka, N. Kanda, Y. Fu, Y. Nabekawa, and E. J. Takahashi, “Perturbed three-channel waveform synthesizer for efficient isolated attosecond pulse generation and characterization,” Opt. Lett. 50, 1461-1464 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Energy-yield and conversion-efficiency measurements of high- order harmonic radiation,

    T. Ditmire, J. K. Crane, H. Nguyen, L. B. DaSilva, and M. D. Perry, “Energy-yield and conversion-efficiency measurements of high- order harmonic radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 51, R902 (1995)

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    High photon flux table-top coherent extreme-ultraviolet source,

    S. Hädrich, A. Klenke, J. Rothhardt, M. Krebs, A. Hoffmann, O. Pronin, V. Pervak, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High photon flux table-top coherent extreme-ultraviolet source,” Nat. Photonics 8, 779-783 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Wavelength scaling of high harmonic generation efficiency,

    A. D. Shiner, C. Trallero-Herrero, N. Kajumba, H.-C. Bandulet, D. Comtois, F. Légaré, M. Giguère, J. C. Kieffer, P. B. Corkum, and D. M. Villeneuve, “Wavelength scaling of high harmonic generation efficiency,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 073902 (2009). 13

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    Wavelength scaling of efficient high-order harmonic generation by two-color infrared laser fields,

    P. Lan, E.J. Takahashi, and K. Midorikwa, “Wavelength scaling of efficient high-order harmonic generation by two-color infrared laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 061802(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Femtosecond diffractive imaging with a soft-X-ray free-electron laser,

    H. N. Chapman, A. Barty, M. J. Bogan, S. Boutet, M. Frank, S. P. Hau-Riege, S. Marchesini, B. W. Woods, S. Bajt, W. H. Benner, R. A. London, E. Plönjes, M. Kuhlmann, R. Treusch, S. Düsterer, et al., “Femtosecond diffractive imaging with a soft-X-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Phys. 2, 839-843 (2006)

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Coherent Diffraction Imaging Analysis of Shape-Controlled Nanoparticles with Focused Hard X‑ray Free-Electron Laser Pulses,

    Y. Takahashi, A. Suzuki, N. Zettsu, T. Oroguchi, Y. Takayama, Y. Sekiguchi, A. Kobayashi, M. Yamamoto, and M. Nakasako, “Coherent Diffraction Imaging Analysis of Shape-Controlled Nanoparticles with Focused Hard X‑ray Free-Electron Laser Pulses,” Nano Lett. 13, 6028-6032 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Broadband coherent diffractive imaging,

    J. Huijts, S. Fernandez, D. Gauthier, M. Kholodtsova, A. Maghraoui, K. Medjoubi, A. Somogyi, W. Boutu, and H. Merdji, “Broadband coherent diffractive imaging,” Nat. Photonics 14, 618-622 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Potential of Attosecond Coherent Diffractive Imaging,

    A. Rana, J. Zhang, M. Pham, A. Yuan, Y. H. Lo, H. Jiang, S. J. Osher, and J. Miao, “Potential of Attosecond Coherent Diffractive Imaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 086101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Delay control in attosecond pump-probe experiments,

    M. Chini, H. Mashiko, H. Wang, S. Chen, C. Yun, S. Scott, S. Gilbertson, and Z. Chang, “Delay control in attosecond pump-probe experiments,” Opt. Express 17, 21459-21464 (2009). Methods Cascaded post -compression. The entire cascaded post -compressor was enclosed within a vacuum chamber (maintained at 10⁻⁴ mbar) to compress the 36 mJ Ti:sapphire laser pul...

    work page 2009