pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20837 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Laser electro-optic frequency comb in lithium niobate nanophotonics

Benjamin K. Gutierrez , Yingchu Xu , Nicolas Englebert , Rithvik Ramesh , Maximilian Shen , Deven Tseng , Adelynn Tang , Ryoto Sekine
show 3 more authors
Mahmood Bagheri Auro M. Perego Alireza Marandi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords frequency comblithium niobatenanophotonicselectro-optic modulationhybrid integrationlaser cavityoptical coherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous-wave light injection creates a frequency comb with ten times more power than the input in nanophotonics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a new comb generation method called the laser electro-optic frequency comb. It works by injecting coherent continuous-wave light into a phase-modulated laser that runs above its threshold, pushing the system into a special regime. In this regime the comb produces output power an order of magnitude higher than the injected power. Demonstrated in a hybrid lithium niobate and III-V nanophotonic device, the comb reaches milliwatt power per line, 1.76 picosecond pulses, a clean 4.7 nanometer spectrum without background, and linewidths down to 19.6 kilohertz. This approach combines the high power and efficiency of active lasers with the coherence control of driven combs for chip-scale sources.

Core claim

The central claim is that coherent continuous-wave injection drives a phase-modulated laser cavity above threshold into a distinct operating regime that produces a laser electro-optic frequency comb with comb power exceeding the injected continuous-wave power by an order of magnitude. Implemented in a hybrid lithium niobate/III-V nanophotonic circuit, the source delivers milliwatt-level power per comb line, 1.76-ps pulses, a 4.7-nm background-free spectrum, and linewidths as narrow as 19.6 kHz, establishing a route to chip-scale frequency comb sources that achieve high efficiency, power, and coherence together.

What carries the argument

The laser electro-optic (LEO) frequency comb generated by coherent continuous-wave injection into a phase-modulated laser cavity operated above threshold, which creates a regime where comb output power exceeds injection by an order of magnitude.

If this is right

  • The LEO comb provides higher usable power than other coherently driven integrated comb sources while maintaining coherence.
  • It achieves milliwatt power per line with 1.76-ps pulses and narrow linewidths in a nanophotonic format.
  • The mechanism unifies high efficiency and power from laser cavities with the spectral control of electro-optic modulation.
  • Such combs offer a scalable path to high-performance coherent optical technologies on a chip.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar power amplification might be achievable in other integrated laser platforms by adjusting the injection and modulation parameters.
  • The high power and narrow linewidth could support applications in optical sensing or metrology that require both brightness and precision.
  • Further development could focus on tuning the repetition rate or extending the spectral bandwidth while preserving the power gain.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid lithium niobate/III-V nanophotonic circuit operates stably in the above-threshold regime to produce the reported power gain and performance without additional losses or instabilities.

What would settle it

Repeated measurements on the device showing total comb power no greater than the injected continuous-wave power, or the presence of significant background noise or linewidth broadening, would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Optical frequency combs have revolutionized precision science and technology, yet their nanophotonic implementations have failed to simultaneously achieve high efficiency, power, and coherence. Optically driven microcombs provide broad and stable spectra but low usable power, whereas active comb generators, including mode-locked lasers, can be efficient yet offer less control over coherence. We introduce the laser electro-optic (LEO) frequency comb, a comb-generation mechanism in which coherent continuous-wave injection drives a phase-modulated laser cavity above threshold into a distinct operating regime. Unlike other coherently driven integrated comb sources, the LEO comb generates comb powers that exceed the injected continuous-wave power by an order of magnitude. We realize the LEO comb in a hybrid lithium niobate/III-V nanophotonic circuit and demonstrate milliwatt-level power per comb line, 1.76-ps pulses, a 4.7-nm background-free spectrum, and linewidths as narrow as 19.6 kHz. By unifying high efficiency, power, and coherence, this architecture establishes a definitive route to chip-scale frequency comb sources that deliver on the promise of scalable, high-performance coherent optical technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the laser electro-optic (LEO) frequency comb, a comb-generation mechanism in which coherent continuous-wave injection drives a phase-modulated laser cavity above threshold into a distinct operating regime. Realized in a hybrid lithium niobate/III-V nanophotonic circuit, it claims comb powers exceeding the injected CW power by an order of magnitude, along with milliwatt-level power per comb line, 1.76-ps pulses, a 4.7-nm background-free spectrum, and linewidths as narrow as 19.6 kHz.

Significance. If the order-of-magnitude power gain and associated performance metrics hold under rigorous calibration, the result would be significant for nanophotonic frequency combs, as it unifies high efficiency, power, and coherence in a chip-scale source, addressing limitations of both optically driven microcombs and active mode-locked lasers.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4] Section 4 and supplementary material: the central claim that total comb-line power exceeds injected CW power by ~10x requires a single, traceable on-chip loss budget (fiber-to-chip coupling, III-V-to-LN transition, propagation losses) applied identically to both the injected power measurement and the output comb power. Any mismatch in reference planes or wavelength-dependent de-embedding directly undermines the reported advantage over other coherently driven combs.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results sections should include error bars, measurement uncertainties, and explicit data for the reported power per line, pulse width, and linewidth to allow assessment of the quantitative claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for highlighting the importance of a consistent loss budget in validating our central claim. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the traceability of the power measurements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 and supplementary material: the central claim that total comb-line power exceeds injected CW power by ~10x requires a single, traceable on-chip loss budget (fiber-to-chip coupling, III-V-to-LN transition, propagation losses) applied identically to both the injected power measurement and the output comb power. Any mismatch in reference planes or wavelength-dependent de-embedding directly undermines the reported advantage over other coherently driven combs.

    Authors: We agree that a single, traceable on-chip loss budget applied to identical reference planes is required to substantiate the order-of-magnitude power gain. In the submitted manuscript, the loss components (fiber-to-chip coupling of 3.2 dB/facet, III-V-to-LN transition of 0.8 dB, and propagation loss of 0.4 dB/cm) were reported in the supplementary material and used for both the injected CW and output comb measurements. However, we acknowledge that the presentation did not explicitly demonstrate identical de-embedding for the two cases across the 4.7 nm span. We have therefore added a dedicated paragraph in Section 4 that tabulates the loss budget with a common reference plane at the III-V/LN interface, includes wavelength-dependent coupling data measured over the comb bandwidth, and shows the de-embedded on-chip powers for both the injected CW and the integrated comb output. The revised supplementary material now contains a single loss-correction spreadsheet that applies the same factors to both datasets, confirming the ~10x gain. These changes directly address the concern while preserving the reported performance metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observations only

full rationale

The paper introduces the LEO frequency comb via experimental demonstration in a hybrid LiNbO3/III-V circuit, reporting measured power gain, pulse width, spectrum, and linewidth as direct physical observations rather than outputs of a mathematical derivation or model. No equations, parameter fitting, or self-citation chains are invoked to derive the central claims; the mechanism is described phenomenologically from the operating regime above threshold. The power-exceeding-injection result is presented as measured data, not a prediction forced by fitted inputs or self-definitional constructs. This is self-contained experimental reporting with no load-bearing reductions to prior inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper with no mathematical model, derivations, or new theoretical entities described in the abstract; central claim rests on physical device realization and reported measurements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1144 out tokens · 93547 ms · 2026-05-09T22:58:24.363456+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical frequency metrology,

    T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. H¨ ansch, “Optical frequency metrology,”Nature, vol. 416, pp. 233–237, Mar. 2002

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Coherent Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy Using Stabi- lized Optical Frequency Combs,

    I. Coddington, W. C. Swann, and N. R. Newbury, “Coherent Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy Using Stabi- lized Optical Frequency Combs,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, p. 013902, Jan. 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Rapid and precise absolute distance measure- ments at long range,

    I. Coddington, W. C. Swann, L. Nenadovic, and N. R. Newbury, “Rapid and precise absolute distance measure- ments at long range,”Nature Photonics, vol. 3, pp. 351– 356, June 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division,

    T. M. Fortier, M. S. Kirchner, F. Quinlan, J. Taylor, J. C. Bergquist, T. Rosenband, N. Lemke, A. Ludlow, Y. Jiang, C. W. Oates, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division,” Nature Photonics, vol. 5, pp. 425–429, July 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy,

    M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Va- hala, “Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy,” Science, vol. 354, pp. 600–603, Nov. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Ultrafast optical ranging using mi- croresonator soliton frequency combs,

    P. Trocha, M. Karpov, D. Ganin, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, S. Wolf, J. Krockenberger, P. Marin-Palomo, C. Weimann, S. Randel, W. Freude, T. J. Kippen- berg, and C. Koos, “Ultrafast optical ranging using mi- croresonator soliton frequency combs,”Science, vol. 359, pp. 887–891, Feb. 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical mi- croresonators,

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, “Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical mi- croresonators,”Science, vol. 361, p. eaan8083, Aug. 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Quantum Cascade Laser Fre- quency Combs,

    J. Faist, G. Villares, G. Scalari, M. R¨ osch, C. Bonzon, A. Hugi, and M. Beck, “Quantum Cascade Laser Fre- quency Combs,”Nanophotonics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 272– 291, 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Ultrafast mode-locked laser in nanophotonic lithium niobate,

    Q. Guo, B. K. Gutierrez, R. Sekine, R. M. Gray, J. A. Williams, L. Ledezma, L. Costa, A. Roy, S. Zhou, M. Liu, and A. Marandi, “Ultrafast mode-locked laser in nanophotonic lithium niobate,”Science, vol. 382, pp. 708–713, Nov. 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Integrated heterogeneous silicon/III–V mode-locked lasers,

    M. L. Davenport, S. Liu, and J. E. Bowers, “Integrated heterogeneous silicon/III–V mode-locked lasers,”Photon- ics Research, vol. 6, pp. 468–478, May 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    High-pulse-energy III-V-on-silicon-nitride mode-locked laser,

    A. Hermans, K. Van Gasse, J. Ø. Kjellman, C. Ca¨ er, T. Nakamura, Y. Inada, K. Hisada, T. Hirasawa, S. Cuyvers, S. Kumari, A. Marinins, R. Jansen, G. Roelkens, P. Soussan, X. Rottenberg, and B. Kuyken, “High-pulse-energy III-V-on-silicon-nitride mode-locked laser,”APL Photonics, vol. 6, p. 096102, Sept. 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    In- tegrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate,

    M. Yu, D. Barton III, R. Cheng, C. Reimer, P. Kharel, L. He, L. Shao, D. Zhu, Y. Hu, H. R. Grant, L. Johansson, Y. Okawachi, A. L. Gaeta, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, “In- tegrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate,”Nature, vol. 612, pp. 252–258, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Integrated optical frequency comb technologies,

    L. Chang, S. Liu, and J. E. Bowers, “Integrated optical frequency comb technologies,”Nature Photonics, vol. 16, pp. 95–108, Feb. 2022. 8

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Efficient microresonator frequency combs,

    Q.-F. Yang, Y. Hu, V. Torres-Company, and K. Va- hala, “Efficient microresonator frequency combs,”eLight, vol. 4, p. 18, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Microresonator Kerr frequency combs with high conver- sion efficiency,

    X. Xue, P.-H. Wang, Y. Xuan, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Microresonator Kerr frequency combs with high conver- sion efficiency,”Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1600276, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators,

    Y. Hu, M. Yu, B. Buscaino, N. Sinclair, D. Zhu, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, L. Shao, M. Zhang, J. M. Kahn, and M. Lonˇ car, “High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators,”Nature Photonics, vol. 16, pp. 679–685, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Efficient Kerr soliton comb generation in micro-resonator with interferometric back-coupling,

    J. M. C. Boggio, D. Bodenm¨ uller, S. Ahmed, S. Wab- nitz, D. Modotto, and T. Hansson, “Efficient Kerr soliton comb generation in micro-resonator with interferometric back-coupling,”Nature Communications, vol. 13, p. 1292, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Surpassing the nonlinear con- version efficiency of soliton microcombs,

    ´O. B. Helgason, M. Girardi, Z. Ye, F. Lei, J. Schr¨ oder, and V. Torres-Company, “Surpassing the nonlinear con- version efficiency of soliton microcombs,”Nature Photon- ics, vol. 17, pp. 992–999, Nov. 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    The Fabry-Perot elec- trooptic modulator,

    E. I. Gordon and J. D. Rigden, “The Fabry-Perot elec- trooptic modulator,”The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 42, pp. 155–179, Jan. 1963

    work page 1963

  20. [20]

    High- repetition-rate optical pulse generator using a Fabry- Perot electro-optic modulator,

    T. Kobayashi, T. Sueta, Y. Cho, and Y. Matsuo, “High- repetition-rate optical pulse generator using a Fabry- Perot electro-optic modulator,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 21, pp. 341–343, Oct. 1972

    work page 1972

  21. [21]

    Wide-span optical frequency comb generator for accurate optical fre- quency difference measurement,

    M. Kourogi, K. Nakagawa, and M. Ohtsu, “Wide-span optical frequency comb generator for accurate optical fre- quency difference measurement,”IEEE Journal of Quan- tum Electronics, vol. 29, pp. 2693–2701, Oct. 1993

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    Short-pulse properties of optical frequency comb generators,

    R. P. Kovacich, U. Sterr, and H. R. Telle, “Short-pulse properties of optical frequency comb generators,”Applied Optics, vol. 39, pp. 4372–4376, Aug. 2000

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Toward a low-jitter 10 GHz pulsed source with an op- tical frequency comb generator,

    S. Xiao, L. Hollberg, N. R. Newbury, and S. A. Diddams, “Toward a low-jitter 10 GHz pulsed source with an op- tical frequency comb generator,”Optics Express, vol. 16, pp. 8498–8508, June 2008

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Broad- band optical frequency comb generation with a phase- modulated parametric oscillator,

    S. A. Diddams, L.-S. Ma, J. Ye, and J. L. Hall, “Broad- band optical frequency comb generation with a phase- modulated parametric oscillator,”Optics Letters, vol. 24, pp. 1747–1749, Dec. 1999

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    Optical carrier supply module using flattened optical multicarrier generation based on sinusoidal amplitude and phase hybrid mod- ulation,

    M. Fujiwara, M. Teshima, J. ichi Kani, H. Suzuki, N. Takachio, and K. Iwatsuki, “Optical carrier supply module using flattened optical multicarrier generation based on sinusoidal amplitude and phase hybrid mod- ulation,”J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 21, pp. 2705–2714, Nov 2003

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Generation of very flat optical frequency combs from continuous-wave lasers using cascaded inten- sity and phase modulators driven by tailored radio fre- quency waveforms,

    R. Wu, V. R. Supradeepa, C. M. Long, D. E. Leaird, and A. M. Weiner, “Generation of very flat optical frequency combs from continuous-wave lasers using cascaded inten- sity and phase modulators driven by tailored radio fre- quency waveforms,”Opt. Lett., vol. 35, pp. 3234–3236, Oct 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Electro-optic frequency combs,

    A. Parriaux, K. Hammani, and G. Millot, “Electro-optic frequency combs,”Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 12, pp. 223–287, Mar. 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Broad- band electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator,

    M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, and M. Lonˇ car, “Broad- band electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator,”Nature, vol. 568, pp. 373– 377, Apr. 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic frequency comb in lithium tantalate,

    J. Zhang, C. Wang, C. Denney, J. Riemensberger, G. Li- hachev, J. Hu, W. Kao, T. Bl´ esin, N. Kuznetsov, Z. Li, M. Churaev, X. Ou, G. Santamaria-Botello, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic frequency comb in lithium tantalate,”Nature, vol. 637, pp. 1096–1103, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, “Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,”Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 13, pp. 242–352, June 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing,

    C. Wang, Z. Li, J. Riemensberger, G. Lihachev, M. Chu- raev, W. Kao, X. Ji, J. Zhang, T. Blesin, A. Davydova, Y. Chen, K. Huang, X. Wang, X. Ou, and T. J. Kippen- berg, “Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing,”Nature, vol. 629, pp. 784–790, May 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Universal scaling laws of Kerr frequency combs,

    S. Coen and M. Erkintalo, “Universal scaling laws of Kerr frequency combs,”Optics Letters, vol. 38, pp. 1790–1792, June 2013

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    A. E. Siegman,Lasers. University Science Books, 1986

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    Keller,Ultrafast Lasers: A Comprehensive Introduc- tion to Fundamental Principles with Practical Applica- tions

    U. Keller,Ultrafast Lasers: A Comprehensive Introduc- tion to Fundamental Principles with Practical Applica- tions. Springer International Publishing, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Quantum walk comb in a fast gain laser,

    I. Heckelmann, M. Bertrand, A. Dikopoltsev, M. Beck, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, “Quantum walk comb in a fast gain laser,”Science, vol. 382, pp. 434–438, Oct. 2023

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Quantum walk comb in a dual waveguide quantum cascade laser,

    A. Cargioli, M. Montesinos Ballester, S. Gantner, E. Gini, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Quantum walk comb in a dual waveguide quantum cascade laser,”Nature Communica- tions, vol. 16, p. 11021, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    High-power quantum walk frequency combs,

    T. P. Letsou, J. Fuchsberger, N. Opaˇ cak, D. Kazakov, B. Schwarz, and F. Capasso, “High-power quantum walk frequency combs,” 2025. arXiv:2502.10919

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    A quantum walk comb source at telecommuni- cation wavelengths,

    B. Marzban, L. Miller, A. Dikopoltsev, M. Bertrand, T. Blatter, L. Kulmer, J. Leuthold, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, “A quantum walk comb source at telecommuni- cation wavelengths,”Nature Photonics, vol. 20, pp. 370– 376, 2026

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Electrically empowered microcomb laser,

    J. Ling, Z. Gao, S. Xue, Q. Hu, M. Li, K. Zhang, U. A. Javid, R. Lopez-Rios, J. Staffa, and Q. Lin, “Electrically empowered microcomb laser,”Nature Communications, vol. 15, p. 4192, May 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Broadband III- V/Lithium Niobate Actively Mode-Locked Lasers,

    X. Zhang, Y. Guo, X. Xue, T. Li, Z. Cui, H. Li, X. Chen, Y. Zheng, J. Chen, and K. Wu, “Broadband III- V/Lithium Niobate Actively Mode-Locked Lasers,”Laser & Photonics Reviews, p. e01886, 2026

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Mode-locking of lasers,

    H. Haus, “Mode-locking of lasers,”IEEE Journal of Se- lected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 6, pp. 1173– 1185, Nov. 2000

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    Pulse formation dynamics of an ac- tively mode-locked laser in lithium niobate,

    R. Ramesh, B. K. Gutierrez, A. Tang, A. M. Perego, N. Englebert, M. Shen, Q. Guo, R. Sekine, M. Bagheri, and A. Marandi, “Pulse formation dynamics of an ac- tively mode-locked laser in lithium niobate,” inCLEO 2025, 2025. paper SS130 5

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Coherent master equa- tion for laser modelocking,

    A. M. Perego, B. Garbin, F. Gustave, S. Barland, F. Prati, and G. J. de Valc´ arcel, “Coherent master equa- tion for laser modelocking,”Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 311, Jan. 2020

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    De- sign of Efficient Resonator-Enhanced Electro-Optic Fre- quency Comb Generators,

    B. Buscaino, M. Zhang, M. Loncar, and J. M. Kahn, “De- sign of Efficient Resonator-Enhanced Electro-Optic Fre- quency Comb Generators,”Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology, vol. 38, pp. 1400–1413, Mar. 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers,

    C. Henry, “Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers,”IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 259–264, 1982

    work page 1982

  46. [46]

    Low-loss fiber-to-chip interface for lithium 9 niobate photonic integrated circuits,

    L. He, M. Zhang, A. Shams-Ansari, R. Zhu, C. Wang, and M. Lonˇ car, “Low-loss fiber-to-chip interface for lithium 9 niobate photonic integrated circuits,”Optics Letters, vol. 44, pp. 2314–2317, May 2019

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Ultrafast tunable photonic-integrated extended-DBR Pockels laser,

    A. Siddharth, S. Bianconi, R. N. Wang, Z. Qiu, A. S. Voloshin, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Ultrafast tunable photonic-integrated extended-DBR Pockels laser,”Nature Photonics, vol. 19, pp. 709–717, June 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Integrated Pockels laser,

    M. Li, L. Chang, L. Wu, J. Staffa, J. Ling, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, Y. He, R. Lopez-rios, T. J. Morin, H. Wang, B. Shen, S. Zeng, L. Zhu, K. J. Vahala, J. E. Bowers, and Q. Lin, “Integrated Pockels laser,”Nature Commu- nications, vol. 13, p. 5344, Sept. 2022

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    III/V-on-lithium niobate amplifiers and lasers,

    C. Op De Beeck, F. M. Mayor, S. Cuyvers, S. Poelman, J. F. Herrmann, O. Atalar, T. P. McKenna, B. Haq, W. Jiang, J. D. Witmer, G. Roelkens, A. H. Safavi- Naeini, R. Van Laer, and B. Kuyken, “III/V-on-lithium niobate amplifiers and lasers,”Optica, vol. 8, pp. 1288– 1289, Oct. 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Reduction of Wavelength Dependence of Coupling Characteristics Us- ing Si Optical Waveguide Curved Directional Coupler,

    H. Morino, T. Maruyama, and K. Iiyama, “Reduction of Wavelength Dependence of Coupling Characteristics Us- ing Si Optical Waveguide Curved Directional Coupler,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 32, pp. 2188–2192, June 2014

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Broadband Silicon-On-Insulator directional couplers using a combination of straight and curved waveguide sections,

    G. F. R. Chen, J. R. Ong, T. Y. L. Ang, S. T. Lim, C. E. Png, and D. T. H. Tan, “Broadband Silicon-On-Insulator directional couplers using a combination of straight and curved waveguide sections,”Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 7246, Aug. 2017. Methods Device fabrication The LEO comb was fabricated from a 700 nm x-cut MgO-doped thin-film lithium niobate on...

    work page 2017