pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21195 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🧮 math.NT

Moments and joint nonvanishing of symplectic L-functions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT MSC 11F4611F66
keywords Siegel cusp formsspinor L-functionstandard L-functionmoments of L-functionsnon-vanishingholomorphic formsdegree twolarge weight
0
0 comments X

The pith

An asymptotic formula is established for the moment of the spinor and standard L-functions attached to holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two with large weight.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an asymptotic formula, as the weight k grows, for a moment that combines the spinor L-function and the standard L-function of these Siegel forms. The formula is applied to prove that the two L-functions are simultaneously non-zero at the central point for a positive proportion of the forms. It also produces lower bounds for the second moments of each L-function taken separately. A sympathetic reader cares because controlling the average size of these central values gives information about the arithmetic invariants encoded by the L-functions and helps establish non-vanishing results inside families.

Core claim

We compute an asymptotic formula for the moment involving the spinor L-function and the standard L-function for holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two when the weight k is sufficiently large. The main term arises from the product of local densities and the error term is of lower order, allowing direct applications to simultaneous non-vanishing at s=1/2 and to lower bounds on second moments.

What carries the argument

The moment formed by the product of the spinor L-function and the standard L-function attached to holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two.

If this is right

  • The spinor and standard L-functions are simultaneously non-zero at the central point for a positive proportion of the forms.
  • The second moment of the spinor L-function admits a lower bound of the expected size.
  • The second moment of the standard L-function admits a lower bound of the expected size.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same moment technique might be tried on Siegel forms of higher degree once their L-functions are better understood.
  • The non-vanishing statements could be fed into existing results on the distribution of Hecke eigenvalues to obtain further arithmetic consequences.
  • Lower bounds of this type supply evidence toward the random-matrix predictions for the distribution of central values in this family.

Load-bearing premise

The L-functions attached to the Siegel cusp forms admit analytic continuation and satisfy standard convexity bounds for large weight.

What would settle it

A numerical evaluation of the moment for Siegel forms of weight k=200 that deviates from the predicted main term by more than the allowed error.

read the original abstract

We compute an asymptotic formula for a moment involving the spinor and the standard $L$-functions for holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two and large weight $k$. Applications include simultaneous non-vanishing statements and lower bounds for second moments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes an asymptotic formula for a moment involving the spinor and the standard L-functions for holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two and large weight k. Applications include simultaneous non-vanishing statements and lower bounds for second moments.

Significance. If the main term is shown to be positive and to dominate the error term, the result supplies new information on the joint distribution of values of the spinor and standard L-functions attached to Siegel forms of degree 2. The argument rests on the established analytic continuation, functional equations, and convexity bounds for these L-functions together with averaging via the Petersson formula or spectral expansion; this is a standard but effective route that directly yields the stated non-vanishing and moment applications once positivity is verified.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The precise statement of the moment (e.g., whether it is a sum over the Petersson norm or an integral against a test function) should be written explicitly in the introduction or the statement of the main theorem so that the reader can immediately see the normalization.
  2. [Main theorem] The error term in the asymptotic should be stated with an explicit dependence on k (or on the level) rather than left in O-notation; this would make the comparison with the main term fully transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report, so we have no specific points to address point-by-point. We will incorporate any minor suggestions or corrections in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation relies on standard analytic continuation, functional equations, convexity bounds, and the Petersson formula for Siegel modular forms, all drawn from independent prior literature (Andrianov, Böcherer et al.). No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz imported from the authors' own prior work; the asymptotic main term is obtained via spectral expansion and positivity arguments that remain externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger records the minimal domain assumptions required to state the claim; no free parameters or invented entities are visible.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard analytic continuation, functional equation, and growth estimates hold for the spinor and standard L-functions attached to holomorphic Siegel cusp forms of degree two.
    The moment asymptotic and non-vanishing applications presuppose these properties, which are standard in the field but not re-proved here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5316 in / 1399 out tokens · 42964 ms · 2026-05-09T20:13:10.079522+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. N. Andrianov, Euler expansions of theta-transforms of Siegel modular forms of degree n , Mat. Sb. 105 (147) (1978), 291-341; English transl. in Math. USSR Sb. 34 (1978)

  2. [2]

    A. N. Andrianov, V L. Kalinin, On the analytic properties of Standard Zeta functions of Siegel modular forms, Math. USSR Sb. 35(1) (1979)

  3. [3]

    Blomer, On the central value of symmetric square L -functions, Math

    V. Blomer, On the central value of symmetric square L -functions, Math. Z. 260 (2008), 755-777

  4. [4]

    Blomer, Spectral summation formula for GSp (4) and moments of spinor L -functions, J

    V. Blomer, Spectral summation formula for GSp (4) and moments of spinor L -functions, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 21 (2019), 1751-1774

  5. [5]

    ocherer, \

    S. B\"ocherer, \"Uber die Funktionalgleichung automorpher L-Funktionen zur Siegelschen Modulgruppe, J. Reine Angew. Math. 362 (1985), 146-168

  6. [6]

    S. Das, H. Krishna, Bounds for the Bergman kernel and the sup-norm of holomorphic Siegel cusp forms, Int. Math. Res. Not. Volume 2024, Issue 7 (2024), 6140–6175

  7. [7]

    Blomer, R

    V. Blomer, R. Khan, M. Young, Distribution of mass of holomorphic cusp forms, Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), 2609-2644

  8. [8]

    Dickson, A

    M. Dickson, A. Pitale, A. Saha, R. Schmidt, Explicit refinements of B\"ocherer's conjecture for Siegel modular forms of squarefree level, J. Math. Soc. Japan 72 (2020), 251-301

  9. [9]

    D. W. Farmer, A. Pitale, N. C. Ryan, R. Schmidt, Charactarizations of the Saito-Kurokawa lifting, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 43 (2013), 1747-1757

  10. [10]

    Furusawa, K

    M. Furusawa, K. Morimoto, Refined global Gross-Prasad conjecture on special Bessel periods and B\"ocherer's conjecture, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 23 (2021), 1295-1331

  11. [11]

    I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of integrals, series, and products, 7th edition, Academic Press, New York, 2007

  12. [12]

    Igusa, On Siegel modular forms of genus two (II), Amer

    J.-I. Igusa, On Siegel modular forms of genus two (II), Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 392-412

  13. [13]

    Iwaniec, E

    H. Iwaniec, E. Kowalski, Analytic Number Theory, Colloq. Publ. 53, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004

  14. [14]

    H. Kim, S. Wakatsuki, T. Yamauchi, An equidistribution theorem for holomorphic Siegel modular forms for GSp _4 and its applications, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 19 (2020), 351-419

  15. [15]

    Kitaoka, Fourier coefficients of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2, Nagoya Math

    Y. Kitaoka, Fourier coefficients of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2, Nagoya Math. J. 93 (1984), 149-171

  16. [16]

    F. W. J. Olver, The asymptotic expansion of Bessel functions of large order, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 247 (1954), 328-368

  17. [17]

    Prudnikov, Yu

    A. Prudnikov, Yu. Brychkov, O. Marichev, Integrals and series, vol. II, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1986

  18. [18]

    E. M. Stein, G. Weiss, Introduction to Fourier analysis on Euclidean spaces, Princeton University Press, 1971

  19. [19]

    X. Wang, Z. Wei, P. Yan, S. Yi, Some remarks on strong multiplicity one for paramodular forms, Mathematika, to appear

  20. [20]

    Zhao, Weighted low-lying zeros of L -functions attached to Siegel modular forms, Pacific J

    S. Zhao, Weighted low-lying zeros of L -functions attached to Siegel modular forms, Pacific J. Math. 335 (2025), 183-210