arxiv: 2604.21410 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Encrypted Visual Feedback Control Using RLWE-Based Cryptosystem

Taichi Ikezaki , Kaoru Teranishi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY

keywords encrypted visual feedbackRLWE encryptionprivacy-preserving controlimage processing on encrypted dataone-dimensional stage controlhomomorphic encryption in control

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Control systems can extract features and apply feedback laws directly to encrypted images using RLWE encryption.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes an algorithm for visual feedback control of a one-dimensional stage that operates entirely on encrypted camera images. Feature extraction from the images and the controller computations both happen without decrypting the data, keeping sensitive visual information private. The method packs an entire image into a single ciphertext via RLWE message packing to lower the computational burden. Numerical simulations confirm the approach works for regulating the stage position.

Core claim

The algorithm performs both feature extraction and controller computations directly on encrypted images using Ring Learning With Errors (RLWE) encryption, with images packed into single ciphertexts to reduce cost, as shown effective in simulations for one-dimensional stage regulation.

What carries the argument

RLWE encryption scheme with message packing technique that allows processing of visual data without decryption.

If this is right

Visual data remains encrypted and protected during the entire control process.
Computational cost is reduced by encrypting the image into one ciphertext.
The framework maintains control performance as verified through numerical simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Such methods could extend to higher-dimensional control systems if precision holds.
Real-time implementation might require optimizations for encryption overhead in practical hardware.
This privacy approach opens possibilities for secure remote control applications.

Load-bearing premise

Feature extraction and control computations can be performed accurately on RLWE-encrypted images without significant loss of precision or stability.

What would settle it

A numerical experiment or hardware test demonstrating that the encrypted control leads to unstable or inaccurate stage positioning compared to the unencrypted baseline.

read the original abstract

This study proposes an encrypted visual feedback control algorithm for regulating a one-dimensional stage using Ring Learning With Errors (RLWE) encryption. The proposed algorithm performs both feature extraction and controller computations directly on encrypted images, ensuring that sensitive visual data remain protected throughout the entire control process. Furthermore, an image captured by the camera is encrypted into a single ciphertext leveraging the message packing technique of RLWE encryption, thereby reducing computational cost. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through numerical simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows a concrete RLWE-based pipeline for doing visual feature extraction and control on a single packed ciphertext for a 1D stage, but the simulations leave noise growth and long-term stability unexamined.

read the letter

The new piece here is the end-to-end construction that packs an entire image into one RLWE ciphertext and then runs both the feature extractor and the feedback law homomorphically. That avoids multiple ciphertexts and keeps the visual data encrypted the whole time. The simulations close the loop on a one-dimensional stage and show regulation works in the reported cases, which is a practical demonstration even if limited in scope.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an RLWE-based encrypted visual feedback control scheme for regulating a one-dimensional stage. It claims that both image feature extraction and the feedback control law can be executed directly on encrypted visual data by packing an entire camera image into a single RLWE ciphertext, thereby preserving privacy throughout the loop, with effectiveness shown via numerical simulations.

Significance. If the homomorphic feature extraction and control steps can be shown to preserve sufficient precision for stable closed-loop behavior, the work would provide a concrete demonstration of end-to-end encrypted visual servoing with practical packing efficiency. The single-ciphertext approach addresses a relevant computational bottleneck in homomorphic control. At present, however, the absence of parameter specifications and quantitative noise/stability metrics in the simulations reduces the immediate significance of the reported results.

major comments (2)

[Numerical Simulations] Numerical Simulations section: the reported experiments do not specify the RLWE parameters (polynomial degree N, ciphertext modulus q, noise variance σ, or number of homomorphic operations performed), nor do they quantify the decryption error or feature-extraction deviation after the full sequence of additions and multiplications required for image moments and the control law. This directly affects the central claim that stable regulation is achieved under encryption.
[Encrypted Feature Extraction] Encrypted Feature Extraction subsection: no explicit homomorphic circuit or noise-growth analysis is provided for the operations that extract the scalar position estimate (e.g., weighted pixel sums or moments) from the packed ciphertext. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the accumulated noise remains below the decryption threshold or within the stability margins of the 1-D stage dynamics.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction could more clearly state the assumed camera model and the exact form of the visual feature (e.g., centroid versus moment) used for feedback.
[Preliminaries] Notation for the packed plaintext vector and the corresponding RLWE ciphertext should be introduced consistently before the algorithmic description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details on parameters and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical Simulations] Numerical Simulations section: the reported experiments do not specify the RLWE parameters (polynomial degree N, ciphertext modulus q, noise variance σ, or number of homomorphic operations performed), nor do they quantify the decryption error or feature-extraction deviation after the full sequence of additions and multiplications required for image moments and the control law. This directly affects the central claim that stable regulation is achieved under encryption.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript omitted explicit RLWE parameter values and quantitative noise metrics, which limits verifiability of the simulation results. In the revised version we have added these specifications (including N, q, σ, and operation count) together with measured decryption error and feature deviation after the full homomorphic sequence. The added data confirm that the accumulated noise remains small enough to preserve the closed-loop stability margins of the 1-D stage. revision: yes
Referee: [Encrypted Feature Extraction] Encrypted Feature Extraction subsection: no explicit homomorphic circuit or noise-growth analysis is provided for the operations that extract the scalar position estimate (e.g., weighted pixel sums or moments) from the packed ciphertext. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the accumulated noise remains below the decryption threshold or within the stability margins of the 1-D stage dynamics.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original text did not supply an explicit circuit description or noise-growth bounds for the moment-based feature extraction. The revised manuscript now includes a step-by-step homomorphic circuit for the weighted pixel sums and a brief noise-growth analysis showing that the noise after the required additions and multiplications stays below the decryption threshold while keeping the 1-D stage within its stability margins. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new RLWE encrypted control construction independent of its inputs

full rationale

The paper proposes a novel algorithm that performs feature extraction and feedback control directly on RLWE-encrypted images via message packing into a single ciphertext. No derivation reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the central claim is a new homomorphic implementation whose accuracy is asserted via separate numerical simulations rather than by algebraic identity with the inputs. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-imported steps appear in the provided abstract or described framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal assumes RLWE supports accurate homomorphic feature extraction and control without detailing the exact packing or noise management; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are visible from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5367 in / 1024 out tokens · 21087 ms · 2026-05-09T20:59:05.896459+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references

[1]

Visual servo con- trol. I. Basic approaches,

F. Chaumette and S. Hutchinson, “Visual servo con- trol. I. Basic approaches,” IEEE Robotics & Au- tomation Magazine , V ol. 13, No. 4, pp. 82–90, 2006

2006
[2]

Visual servo con- trol. II. Advanced approaches,

F. Chaumette and S. Hutchinson, “Visual servo con- trol. II. Advanced approaches,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, V ol. 14, No. 1, pp. 109–118, 2007

2007
[3]

Devel- opment of autonomous navigation system based on neural network and visual servoing for row-crop tracking in vegetable greenhouses,

Hongliang Y uan, Y uhui Liang, Zhulin Li, “Devel- opment of autonomous navigation system based on neural network and visual servoing for row-crop tracking in vegetable greenhouses,” Smart Agricul- tural T echnology, V ol. 9, 2024

2024
[4]

Hierarchical image-based visual-servoing control for stewart manipulators via data-driven adaptation and incremental prediction,

S. Zhou, J. Wang, D. Liu, H. Y u, R. Hao, J. Li, and H. Zhang, “Hierarchical image-based visual-servoing control for stewart manipulators via data-driven adaptation and incremental prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , 2026. (Early Access)

2026
[5]

Cyber-security enhance- ment of networked control Systems using homo- morphic encryption,

K. Kogiso and T. Fujita, “Cyber-security enhance- ment of networked control Systems using homo- morphic encryption,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2015, pp. 6836–6843

2015
[6]

Encrypted control for networked systems: An illustrative introduction and current challenges,

M. S. Darup, A. B. Alexandru, D. E. Quevedo, and G. J. Pappas, “Encrypted control for networked systems: An illustrative introduction and current challenges,” IEEE Control Systems , V ol. 41, No. 3, pp. 58–78, 2021

2021
[7]

Comparison of encrypted control approaches and tutorial on dynamic systems using Learning With Errors-based homomorphic encryp- tion,

J. Kim, D. Kim, Y . Song, H. Shim, H. Sandberg, and K. H. Johansson, “Comparison of encrypted control approaches and tutorial on dynamic systems using Learning With Errors-based homomorphic encryp- tion,” Annual Reviews in Control , V ol. 54, pp. 200– 218, 2022

2022
[8]

A brief survey on encrypted control: From the ﬁrst to the second generation and beyond,

N. Schl¨ uter, P . Binfet, and M. S. Darup, “A brief survey on encrypted control: From the ﬁrst to the second generation and beyond,” Annual Reviews in Control, V ol. 56, p. 100913, 2023

2023
[9]

Homo- morphic encryption for arithmetic of approximate numbers,

J. H. Cheon, A. Kim, M. Kim, and Y . Song, “Homo- morphic encryption for arithmetic of approximate numbers,” Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2017, LNCS, V ol. 10624, pp. 409–437, 2017

2017
[10]

Bootstrapping for approximate homomorphic en- cryption,

J. H. Cheon, K. Han, A. Kim, M. Kim, and Y . Song, “Bootstrapping for approximate homomorphic en- cryption,” Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2018, LNCS, V ol. 10820, pp. 360–384, 2018

2018
[11]

A ﬁrst step toward visual servoing using image moments,

F. Chaumette, “A ﬁrst step toward visual servoing using image moments,” Proc. IEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems,pp. 378-383, 2002

2002
[12]

Simple Encrypted Arithmetic Library 2.3.1,

K. Laine, “Simple Encrypted Arithmetic Library 2.3.1,” Microsoft Research , 2017. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/sealmanual-2-3-1.pdf

2017