Connecting the dusty dots: dust depletion and extinction of local interstellar clouds

A. De Cia; A. J. Fox; C. Ledoux; J.-K. Krogager; T. Ramburuth-Hurt

arxiv: 2604.24752 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Connecting the dusty dots: dust depletion and extinction of local interstellar clouds

T. Ramburuth-Hurt , A. De Cia , J.-K. Krogager , C. Ledoux , A. J. Fox This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords dust depletiondust extinctioninterstellar mediumLocal BubbleMilky Waychemical mixingUV absorption3D mapping

0 comments

The pith

Dust depletion measurements from UV spectra can be matched to peaks in 3D extinction maps to locate individual gas clouds and map metals in the local Milky Way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates parsec-scale interstellar clouds by combining two probes of the neutral ISM: dust depletion derived from UV absorption lines toward nearby O and B stars, and parsec-resolution 3D dust extinction density maps out to 1.25 kpc. The authors assume a correlation between depletion strength and extinction density to associate specific absorption components with physical locations along each sight line. This association produces spatial maps of metal and dust distributions, identifies a minimum separation of about 100 pc between clouds with distinct chemical properties, assigns depletion values to five Local Bubble clouds, and detects a velocity gradient matching the Bubble's expansion. Independent distances toward theta1 Ori C support the spatial assignments.

Core claim

By assuming a correlation between dust depletion and dust extinction density, absorption components can be spatially associated with peaks in the extinction maps, allowing the authors to pinpoint the locations of gas clouds in physical space and build more detailed maps of ISM metal and dust distributions in the Solar neighbourhood.

What carries the argument

The assumed correlation between the strength of dust depletion in individual absorption components and the local density of dust extinction, used to assign physical positions to the clouds.

If this is right

Chemical properties of the ISM vary on scales of at least 100 pc.
Dust depletion values can be reported for gas clouds physically associated with the Local Bubble.
Velocity gradients in absorption lines can be interpreted as consistent with expansion of local structures such as the Local Bubble.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same association method could be tested on additional sight lines with independent distance constraints to refine the correlation assumption.
Detailed maps produced this way could supply initial conditions for models of how metals and dust mix over time in the ISM.

Load-bearing premise

That stronger dust depletion reliably corresponds to higher dust extinction density so absorption components align with extinction peaks.

What would settle it

Independent distance measurements to several clouds that place them away from the assigned extinction peaks, or a larger sample showing no overall correlation between depletion strength and extinction density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24752 by A. De Cia, A. J. Fox, C. Ledoux, J.-K. Krogager, T. Ramburuth-Hurt.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of dust extinction density with level of dust view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Top: Ca ii absorption line for θ 1 Ori C are shown by the solid black line in the lower panel of this figure. The solid red lines are the fitted Voigt profiles, which were obtained with VoigtFit (Krogager 2018) in R-H+25. The blue ticks represent the velocity-space positions of each individual component, which have then been grouped, indicated by the blue vertical lines. The values for [Zn/Fe]fit,i given in view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Same as Fig. 5 and including the Fe view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Same as Fig. 2 and including the Ni view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Same as Fig. 2 for HD 154368 view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Same as Fig. 2 for HD 207189. Similarly to HD 206267, view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Same as Fig. 2 for HD 206267. The dust extinction den view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: 2D dust map in the region around each target taken from E view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Three-dimensional plot of the surface of the Local Bub view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Investigating the chemical complexity of the interstellar medium (ISM) is key for understanding its physical nature and evolution. In this work, we study parsec-scale interstellar dust clouds in the neutral ISM of the Milky Way using two different probes: dust depletion and dust extinction. We examine their relationship to investigate the distribution of metals and dust in the Solar neighbourhood, and how they are related to the Local Bubble. We use measurements of dust depletion for individual gas clouds along sight lines of sight towards bright O/B stars within 1.1 kpc of the Sun, derived from UV absorption-line spectra. We combine these with parsec-scale 3D dust extinction density maps out to 1.25 kpc. We assume a correlation between dust depletion and dust extinction density, which we use to imply that the absorption components are spatially associated with the peaks in dust extinction density, and to pinpoint the likely locations of the gas clouds in physical space. We identify peaks in the dust extinction curves, and then associate the stronger peaks with the strongest dust depletion components. Independent distance measurements along the line of sight towards one of our targets, theta1 Ori C, validates our results. In our sample, the minimum distance between clouds that have significantly different chemical properties is ~ 100pc, giving an indication on the physical scale on which chemical mixing remains incomplete in the ISM of the Milky Way. For five of the eight targets, we report dust depletion values for gas clouds associated with the Local Bubble. Additionally, we find a velocity gradient that is consistent with the expansion of the Local Bubble, further supporting our methodology. Overall, we show that it is possible to use complementary information from dust depletion and dust extinction to build more detailed maps of ISM metal and dust distributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper pairs depletion components with extinction peaks for eight local sightlines but the 3D cloud placements rest on an untested correlation assumption for seven of them.

read the letter

The main move here is taking UV-derived dust depletion for individual absorption components along eight O/B star sightlines and matching the strongest depletions to the strongest peaks in existing parsec-scale 3D extinction density maps. They treat the match as evidence that the gas clouds sit at those extinction peaks, which lets them place the clouds in physical space out to 1.25 kpc and tie some of them to the Local Bubble. One target, theta1 Ori C, has an independent distance check that lines up, but the other seven rely on the assumption itself. From the matches they report a ~100 pc minimum separation between clouds with different depletion patterns and a velocity gradient consistent with Local Bubble expansion. The ~100 pc scale is the clearest new observational statement. The inputs themselves look reasonable: the depletion measurements come from standard UV line analysis and the extinction maps are from published 3D reconstructions. The idea of using the two together to sharpen local metal and dust maps is straightforward and worth trying. The load-bearing problem is that the correlation is stated as an assumption and then used to generate the associations without quantitative tests for uniqueness or projection effects. No error budget on the matching is given, and alternative explanations for the observed strengths are not explored. With only one independent validation, the resulting 3D locations and the mixing-scale claim rest on thin ground for most of the sample. This is useful reading for people already working on local ISM depletion or 3D dust mapping who want to see the two datasets overlaid. It is not yet solid enough to treat the placements as established, but the data combination and the reported scale are concrete enough that a serious referee could usefully push on the validation step and the error treatment. I would send it to review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that combining UV absorption measurements of dust depletion in individual gas clouds along sightlines to nearby O/B stars with parsec-scale 3D dust extinction density maps allows construction of more detailed 3D maps of ISM metal and dust distributions. By assuming a correlation between depletion strength and extinction-density peaks, the authors spatially associate absorption components with specific clouds, report a minimum ~100 pc scale for chemically distinct clouds, associate depletion values with the Local Bubble for five of eight targets, and identify a velocity gradient consistent with Local Bubble expansion, with independent distance validation for one target (θ¹ Ori C).

Significance. If the spatial associations prove robust, the work demonstrates a viable route to fuse absorption-line and extinction data for parsec-scale chemical mapping in the local ISM, yielding concrete results on mixing lengths and Local Bubble structure that could be tested against simulations or additional sightlines.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central methodology states 'We assume a correlation between dust depletion and dust extinction density, which we use to imply that the absorption components are spatially associated with the peaks in dust extinction density' and then uses this to locate clouds and derive all subsequent results on mixing scales and Local Bubble associations. Independent validation is reported only for θ¹ Ori C; for the remaining seven sightlines the associations rest on the untested assumption, raising risks of projection effects or non-unique matching that are not quantified or tested via alternatives such as randomized component matching.
[Abstract] Abstract and results discussion: No quantitative error analysis, uncertainty propagation, or assessment of association robustness (e.g., via Monte Carlo trials on peak strengths or velocity uncertainties) is described, yet the paper reports specific claims such as the ~100 pc minimum distance between chemically distinct clouds and associations for five targets with the Local Bubble; these numbers are load-bearing for the mixing-scale and Local Bubble conclusions.
[Abstract] Abstract: The velocity gradient 'consistent with the expansion of the Local Bubble' is presented as further support for the methodology, but without a quantitative model comparison, predicted expansion velocities, or error bars on the measured velocities, it is unclear whether this constitutes independent validation or is merely compatible with the assumed associations.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: 'sight lines of sight' contains a redundant phrase that should be corrected for clarity.
[Abstract] Abstract: The distance ranges (sightlines within 1.1 kpc, maps out to 1.25 kpc) are close but not identical; a brief note on the overlap or any truncation effects would improve precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major point below, making revisions to improve the robustness and clarity of the analysis where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central methodology states 'We assume a correlation between dust depletion and dust extinction density, which we use to imply that the absorption components are spatially associated with the peaks in dust extinction density' and then uses this to locate clouds and derive all subsequent results on mixing scales and Local Bubble associations. Independent validation is reported only for θ¹ Ori C; for the remaining seven sightlines the associations rest on the untested assumption, raising risks of projection effects or non-unique matching that are not quantified or tested via alternatives such as randomized component matching.

Authors: We agree that the core associations for seven sightlines rest on the physically motivated correlation between depletion strength and extinction density peaks, with independent distance validation available only for θ¹ Ori C. To address projection effects and matching uniqueness, we have added a dedicated discussion section that uses the number of observed peaks per sightline and the additional constraints from component velocities and depletion values to argue for the robustness of the matches. We did not perform randomized component matching because it would discard the physical priors from depletion and velocity data; instead, the revision quantifies the typical multiplicity of peaks and the distinctiveness of strong-depletion associations. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results discussion: No quantitative error analysis, uncertainty propagation, or assessment of association robustness (e.g., via Monte Carlo trials on peak strengths or velocity uncertainties) is described, yet the paper reports specific claims such as the ~100 pc minimum distance between chemically distinct clouds and associations for five targets with the Local Bubble; these numbers are load-bearing for the mixing-scale and Local Bubble conclusions.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of formal uncertainty quantification in the original submission. The revised manuscript now includes Monte Carlo trials that perturb extinction density peak locations and amplitudes within their uncertainties, along with velocity errors, to re-assess associations and derive confidence intervals on the reported distances. The ~100 pc minimum scale between chemically distinct clouds is now presented as a lower limit with an associated uncertainty range obtained from these trials, and the Local Bubble associations for five targets are shown to remain stable under the perturbations. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The velocity gradient 'consistent with the expansion of the Local Bubble' is presented as further support for the methodology, but without a quantitative model comparison, predicted expansion velocities, or error bars on the measured velocities, it is unclear whether this constitutes independent validation or is merely compatible with the assumed associations.

Authors: The observed velocity gradient is offered as corroborative evidence rather than independent validation. In the revision we have added error bars to the component velocities, performed a linear fit to quantify the gradient, and compared the slope to literature values for Local Bubble expansion (~15 km s⁻¹). While a detailed hydrodynamic model comparison lies beyond the present scope, the quantitative consistency within uncertainties is now explicitly stated, and the text clarifies the supporting rather than validating role of this observation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper explicitly states an assumption of correlation between dust depletion and dust extinction density, which is then used to associate absorption components with extinction peaks and locate clouds in 3D space. This is presented as an interpretive step to combine complementary datasets rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No equations or fitted parameters are shown to rename predictions or create self-definitional loops. Independent distance validation is reported for θ¹ Ori C, and a velocity gradient consistency check supports the Local Bubble associations. The central claim of building more detailed ISM maps rests on this stated assumption but does not claim to derive the correlation itself or import uniqueness via self-citation. The approach is self-contained as a data-combination method with external checks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on one explicit domain assumption and no free parameters or invented entities are described.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A correlation exists between dust depletion and dust extinction density that allows spatial association of absorption components with extinction peaks.
Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for locating clouds and interpreting their chemistry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1178 out tokens · 26969 ms · 2026-05-08T02:29:26.601451+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

work page 2021
[2]

C., Savage, B

Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

work page 1978
[3]

2019, A&A, 623, A43

Bolmer, J., Ledoux, C., Wiseman, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A43

work page 2019
[4]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

work page 1989
[5]

Clemens, D. P. 1985, ApJ, 295, 422 De Cia, A., Jenkins, E. B., Fox, A. J., et al. 2021, Nature, 597, 206 De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Mattsson, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A97

work page 1985
[6]

E., Bailer-Jones, C

Dharmawardena, T. E., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Fouesneau, M., et al. 2024, MN- RAS, 532, 3480

work page 2024
[7]

2024, A&A, 685, A82

Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82

work page 2024
[8]

Field, G. B. 1974, ApJ, 187, 453

work page 1974
[9]

A., Dettbarn, C., & Flynn, C

Fuchs, B., Breitschwerdt, D., de Avillez, M. A., Dettbarn, C., & Flynn, C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 993 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

work page 2006
[10]

D., Clayton, G

Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279

work page 2003
[11]

Green, G. M. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695

work page 2018
[12]

M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93

work page 2019
[13]

Jenkins, E. B. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 1299

work page 2009
[14]

2022, A&A, 666, A12

Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Krogager, J.-K., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A12

work page 2022
[15]

2024, A&A, 681, A64

Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A64

work page 2024
[16]

2018, V oigtFit: Absorption line fitting for V oigt profiles, Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.016

Krogager, J.-K. 2018, V oigtFit: Absorption line fitting for V oigt profiles, Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.016

work page 2018
[17]

2018, A&A, 616, A132

Lallement, R., Capitanio, L., Ruiz-Dern, L., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A132

work page 2018
[18]

H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T

Leike, R. H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2020, A&A, 639, A138 O’Neill, T. J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., & Edenhofer, G. 2024, ApJ, 973, 136

work page 2020
[19]

Pei, Y . C. 1992, ApJ, 395, 130

work page 1992
[20]

J., Crawford, I

Price, R. J., Crawford, I. A., Barlow, M. J., & Howarth, I. D. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 555

work page 2001
[21]

K., et al

Ramburuth-Hurt, T., De Cia, A., Krogager, J. K., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A14

work page 2025
[22]

K., et al

Ramburuth-Hurt, T., De Cia, A., Krogager, J. K., et al. 2023, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 672, A68

work page 2023
[23]

& Linsky, J

Redfield, S. & Linsky, J. L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 283

work page 2008
[24]

J., Menten, K

Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131 Rezaei Kh., S., Beuther, H., Benjamin, R. A., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A255

work page 2019
[25]

M., Jenkins, E

Ritchey, A. M., Jenkins, E. B., Shull, J. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 57

work page 2023
[26]

B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al

Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 95

work page 2021
[27]

Savage, B. D. & Mathis, J. S. 1979, ARA&A, 17, 73

work page 1979
[28]

Savage, B. D. & Sembach, K. R. 1996, Annual Review of Astronomy and As- trophysics, 34, 279

work page 1996
[29]

& Fall, S

Savaglio, S. & Fall, S. M. 2004, ApJ, 614, 293

work page 2004
[30]

F., Meisner, A

Schlafly, E. F., Meisner, A. M., Stutz, A. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 78 Schönrich, R., Binney, J., & Dehnen, W. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829

work page 2016
[31]

A., Clayton, G

Valencic, L. A., Clayton, G. C., & Gordon, K. D. 2004, ApJ, 616, 912

work page 2004
[32]

E., Sonnentrucker, P., Snow, T

Welty, D. E., Sonnentrucker, P., Snow, T. P., & York, D. G. 2020, ApJ, 897, 36

work page 2020
[33]

2017, A&A, 599, A24

Wiseman, P., Schady, P., Bolmer, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A24

work page 2017
[34]

M., & Rix, H.-W

Zhang, X., Green, G. M., & Rix, H.-W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1855

work page 2023
[35]

A., Alves, J., et al

Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., Alves, J., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 334 Article number, page 10 of 11 T. Ramburuth-Hurt et al.: Connecting the dusty dots: dust depletion and extinction of local interstellar clouds Fig. A.1: Top: best-fit straight line to dust extinction density vs dust depletion. The plot here is the same as Figure 1, with the in- clusion of...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

work page 2021

[2] [2]

C., Savage, B

Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

work page 1978

[3] [3]

2019, A&A, 623, A43

Bolmer, J., Ledoux, C., Wiseman, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A43

work page 2019

[4] [4]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

work page 1989

[5] [5]

Clemens, D. P. 1985, ApJ, 295, 422 De Cia, A., Jenkins, E. B., Fox, A. J., et al. 2021, Nature, 597, 206 De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Mattsson, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A97

work page 1985

[6] [6]

E., Bailer-Jones, C

Dharmawardena, T. E., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Fouesneau, M., et al. 2024, MN- RAS, 532, 3480

work page 2024

[7] [7]

2024, A&A, 685, A82

Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Field, G. B. 1974, ApJ, 187, 453

work page 1974

[9] [9]

A., Dettbarn, C., & Flynn, C

Fuchs, B., Breitschwerdt, D., de Avillez, M. A., Dettbarn, C., & Flynn, C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 993 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

work page 2006

[10] [10]

D., Clayton, G

Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279

work page 2003

[11] [11]

Green, G. M. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695

work page 2018

[12] [12]

M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93

work page 2019

[13] [13]

Jenkins, E. B. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 1299

work page 2009

[14] [14]

2022, A&A, 666, A12

Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Krogager, J.-K., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A12

work page 2022

[15] [15]

2024, A&A, 681, A64

Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A64

work page 2024

[16] [16]

2018, V oigtFit: Absorption line fitting for V oigt profiles, Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.016

Krogager, J.-K. 2018, V oigtFit: Absorption line fitting for V oigt profiles, Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.016

work page 2018

[17] [17]

2018, A&A, 616, A132

Lallement, R., Capitanio, L., Ruiz-Dern, L., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A132

work page 2018

[18] [18]

H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T

Leike, R. H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2020, A&A, 639, A138 O’Neill, T. J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., & Edenhofer, G. 2024, ApJ, 973, 136

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Pei, Y . C. 1992, ApJ, 395, 130

work page 1992

[20] [20]

J., Crawford, I

Price, R. J., Crawford, I. A., Barlow, M. J., & Howarth, I. D. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 555

work page 2001

[21] [21]

K., et al

Ramburuth-Hurt, T., De Cia, A., Krogager, J. K., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A14

work page 2025

[22] [22]

K., et al

Ramburuth-Hurt, T., De Cia, A., Krogager, J. K., et al. 2023, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 672, A68

work page 2023

[23] [23]

& Linsky, J

Redfield, S. & Linsky, J. L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 283

work page 2008

[24] [24]

J., Menten, K

Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131 Rezaei Kh., S., Beuther, H., Benjamin, R. A., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A255

work page 2019

[25] [25]

M., Jenkins, E

Ritchey, A. M., Jenkins, E. B., Shull, J. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 57

work page 2023

[26] [26]

B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al

Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 95

work page 2021

[27] [27]

Savage, B. D. & Mathis, J. S. 1979, ARA&A, 17, 73

work page 1979

[28] [28]

Savage, B. D. & Sembach, K. R. 1996, Annual Review of Astronomy and As- trophysics, 34, 279

work page 1996

[29] [29]

& Fall, S

Savaglio, S. & Fall, S. M. 2004, ApJ, 614, 293

work page 2004

[30] [30]

F., Meisner, A

Schlafly, E. F., Meisner, A. M., Stutz, A. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 78 Schönrich, R., Binney, J., & Dehnen, W. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829

work page 2016

[31] [31]

A., Clayton, G

Valencic, L. A., Clayton, G. C., & Gordon, K. D. 2004, ApJ, 616, 912

work page 2004

[32] [32]

E., Sonnentrucker, P., Snow, T

Welty, D. E., Sonnentrucker, P., Snow, T. P., & York, D. G. 2020, ApJ, 897, 36

work page 2020

[33] [33]

2017, A&A, 599, A24

Wiseman, P., Schady, P., Bolmer, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A24

work page 2017

[34] [34]

M., & Rix, H.-W

Zhang, X., Green, G. M., & Rix, H.-W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1855

work page 2023

[35] [35]

A., Alves, J., et al

Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., Alves, J., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 334 Article number, page 10 of 11 T. Ramburuth-Hurt et al.: Connecting the dusty dots: dust depletion and extinction of local interstellar clouds Fig. A.1: Top: best-fit straight line to dust extinction density vs dust depletion. The plot here is the same as Figure 1, with the in- clusion of...

work page 2022