Wave Tank Experiment for Sea State Monitoring with Distributed Acoustic Sensing
Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Distributed acoustic sensing on seabed power cables can estimate wave period, height, and direction from water-pressure strain.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors carried out a wave tank experiment with an actual power cable installed under bottom-mounted offshore wind turbine conditions. The results demonstrate that the wave period can be accurately estimated from the frequency-domain analysis of the DAS signal. There is a strong linearity between DAS vibration power and the wave height. The direction of arrival of waves can be estimated with an error of 1.5 degrees when there are at least two laying angles of the cable, together with the estimation of wavelength.
What carries the argument
Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) via Rayleigh backscattering, which measures dynamic strain along the optical fiber induced by time-varying water pressure from waves.
If this is right
- Accurate wave period estimation is possible solely from frequency analysis of the vibration signal.
- DAS vibration power scales linearly with wave height, allowing height estimation from power measurements.
- With multiple cable laying angles, wave direction can be determined to 1.5 degree accuracy along with wavelength.
- This enables sea state monitoring using existing power cables in offshore wind farms without additional sensors.
- The method supports safe operation and environmental assessment across wide areas.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Existing power cable networks could provide continuous, high-resolution sea state data at low marginal cost.
- This might reduce the need for deploying numerous buoys or other sensors in large offshore wind installations.
- Similar techniques could extend to monitoring other underwater phenomena like currents or seismic activity.
- Field tests in actual ocean conditions would be needed to confirm tank results under variable real-world factors.
Load-bearing premise
The assumption that time-varying water pressure from waves will produce detectable dynamic strain on the optical fiber inside the power cable.
What would settle it
A controlled wave tank run in which the DAS-measured frequencies do not match the programmed wave periods or in which vibration power shows no linear relation to measured wave heights.
read the original abstract
Monitoring sea states across the offshore wind farm areas is essential to keep their structures safe, efficiently operate the systems, and assess the environmental effects of wind turbines. Conventional sea state sensors like buoys limit their observable coverage; therefore, installing many sensors across the wide area is necessary to obtain sufficient sea state information. However, such a situation is not practical in terms of cost. Instead, the study proposes utilising optical fibres, which is embedded in existing power cables for telecommunications on the seabed, as sea state monitoring sensors with distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). DAS is a vibration-sensing technology along optical fibres based on the Rayleigh backscattering of the injected laser. It measures the dynamic strain of the optical fibre in real time at each spatial bin, which is called a "channel" along the fibre. In power cables on the seabed, time-varying water pressure due to waves is expected to exert dynamic strain. This hypothesis motivates us to validate whether the application of DAS for power cables can estimate sea state, such as wave period, height, and the direction of arrival. Hence, the authors carried out a wave tank experiment with a programmable wave generator. An actual power cable is installed under the same condition as the bottom-mounted offshore wind turbines. The experimental results show that (i) the wave period can be accurately estimated from the frequency-domain analysis. (ii) The strong linearity between DAS vibration power and the wave height is found. (iii) The direction of arrival of waves can be estimated with the error of 1.5$^\circ$ when there are at least two laying angles of the cable in parallel with the estimation of wavelength. These outcomes promote the feasibility of utilising the existing power cables across offshore wind farms as sea state monitoring sensors.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports results from a wave tank experiment using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) on an optical fiber embedded in a real power cable to monitor sea states. It claims that (i) wave period is accurately recovered from frequency-domain peaks, (ii) DAS vibration power exhibits strong linearity with wave height, and (iii) direction of arrival can be estimated to within 1.5° when at least two distinct cable laying angles are available together with wavelength estimation.
Significance. If the reported accuracies and linearity hold under realistic conditions, the work demonstrates a scalable, infrastructure-leveraging approach to sea-state monitoring across offshore wind farms that could reduce reliance on sparse buoy arrays. The direct experimental validation with an actual power cable is a strength, though the manuscript would benefit from clearer quantification of uncertainties and statistical support for the linearity claim.
major comments (2)
- [Experimental Setup] Experimental Setup section: the claim that the cable is installed 'under the same condition as the bottom-mounted offshore wind turbines' is not supported by sufficient detail on burial or sediment cover. Wave tanks commonly place cables directly on the floor; real seabed cables are trenched or covered, which alters the pressure-to-axial-strain transfer function. Without this specification or a sensitivity test, the reported linearity between vibration power and wave height cannot be assumed to generalize.
- [Results] Results section on direction-of-arrival estimation: the 1.5° error is stated for configurations with at least two laying angles, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit algorithm (e.g., how wavelength estimates from frequency and phase differences are combined with the known angle separation) or an error-propagation analysis. This step is load-bearing for claim (iii) and requires a concrete derivation or pseudocode.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract and Results: the linearity claim would be strengthened by reporting the coefficient of determination, number of trials, and any error bars or confidence intervals on the vibration-power versus wave-height plots.
- [Methods] Figure captions and Methods: ensure all spatial-channel bin sizes, gauge lengths, and sampling rates are stated explicitly so that the frequency-resolution limits on period estimation can be assessed.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify key aspects of our experimental validation and methodological transparency. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and derivations.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Experimental Setup] Experimental Setup section: the claim that the cable is installed 'under the same condition as the bottom-mounted offshore wind turbines' is not supported by sufficient detail on burial or sediment cover. Wave tanks commonly place cables directly on the floor; real seabed cables are trenched or covered, which alters the pressure-to-axial-strain transfer function. Without this specification or a sensitivity test, the reported linearity between vibration power and wave height cannot be assumed to generalize.
Authors: We agree that the manuscript requires explicit clarification on the installation conditions to avoid overgeneralization. In the wave tank, the power cable was placed directly on the flat, rigid tank floor with no burial or sediment cover, which approximates a simplified bottom-mounted scenario but differs from trenched real-world cables. We will revise the Experimental Setup section to describe the exact placement, tank floor characteristics, and any relevant parameters. We will also add a limitations paragraph discussing how the absence of sediment may affect the pressure-to-strain coupling and note that the observed linearity holds under these controlled conditions. A full sensitivity analysis is outside the current scope but will be flagged for future work. This ensures readers understand the applicability of the results. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results] Results section on direction-of-arrival estimation: the 1.5° error is stated for configurations with at least two laying angles, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit algorithm (e.g., how wavelength estimates from frequency and phase differences are combined with the known angle separation) or an error-propagation analysis. This step is load-bearing for claim (iii) and requires a concrete derivation or pseudocode.
Authors: We concur that the direction-of-arrival (DOA) method needs a concrete description to support the 1.5° accuracy claim. The algorithm estimates wavelength from the observed frequency peak and inter-channel phase delays (yielding phase velocity), then uses the known angular separation between cable segments and the wave propagation geometry to solve for DOA via trigonometric relations. We will insert a new subsection detailing the full derivation, including the relevant equations, and provide pseudocode for the computation steps. We will also add a basic error-propagation analysis accounting for uncertainties in frequency detection and phase estimation. These additions will make the procedure reproducible and substantiate the reported error. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: purely experimental validation
full rationale
The paper reports results from a wave tank experiment measuring DAS signals on an installed power cable. All central claims—accurate wave period from frequency peaks, linearity between vibration power and wave height, and 1.5° direction error using multiple cable angles plus wavelength—are direct empirical observations from the collected data. No mathematical derivations, first-principles models, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are invoked to support the results. The analysis consists of standard signal processing (FFT for frequency, power integration, phase/delay estimation) applied to measured time series, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. The hypothesis about pressure-to-strain coupling is stated as motivation and tested experimentally rather than assumed in a closed loop.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Time-varying water pressure due to waves exerts dynamic strain on the optical fibre in power cables on the seabed.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
3D Ocean Water Wave Surface Analysis on Airborne LiDAR Bathymetric Point Clouds
[2]. Roshandel, S., Liu, W., Wang, C., & Li, J. “3D Ocean Water Wave Surface Analysis on Airborne LiDAR Bathymetric Point Clouds”. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13:3918. [3]. Jahanmard, V ., Varbla, S., Delpeche-Ellmann, N., & Ellmann, A. “Retrieval of directional power spectral density and wave parameters from airborne LiDAR point cloud”. Ocean Engineering. 2022...
work page 2021
-
[2]
Schematic view of sea state monitoring with DAS and the optical fibre embedded in the already existing power cable of offshore wind farms. 9 [6]. Ip, E., Fang, J., Li, Y ., Wang, Q., Huang, M.-F., Salemi, M., & Huang, Y .-K. “Distributed fiber sensor network using telecom cables as sensing media: technology advancements and applications”. Journal of Optic...
work page 2022
-
[3]
Monitoring Deep Sea Currents With Seafloor Distributed Acoustic Sensing
[8]. Mata Flores, D., Sladen, A., Ampuero, J.-P., Mercerat, E. D., & Rivet, D. “Monitoring Deep Sea Currents With Seafloor Distributed Acoustic Sensing”. Earth and Space Science. 2023; 10: e2022EA002723. [9]. Lin, L., Fang, S., He, R., Tang, Q., Qu, F., Wang, B., & Xu, W. “Monitoring ocean currents during the passage of Typhoon Muifa using optical-fiber d...
work page 2023
-
[4]
[11]. Mizuguchi, K., Mishima, S., & Ding, Y . “Monitoring Submarine Power Transmission Cable Conditions with Optical Fiber Sensing Technology for Offshore Wind Power Generation”. NEC Technical Journal. 2025; 18:1. [12]. “Contributing to the safety and cost efficiency of offshore wind power by leveraging NEC ’s optical fiber sensing technology for the moni...
work page 2025
-
[5]
[14]. Fang, J., Yang, Y ., Shen, Z., Biondi, E., Wang, X., Williams, E. F., Becker, M. W., Eslamian, D., Zhan, Z. “Directional Sensitivity of DAS and Its Effect on Rayleigh -Wave Tomography: A Case Study in Oxnard, California”. Seismological Research Letters. 2023; 94:887–897. [15]. Van Veen, B. D., & Buckley, K. M. “Beamforming: A V ersatile Approach to ...
work page 2023
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.