pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26305 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 💻 cs.HC

Towards a Frugal Photosynthesis Sensing Toolkit for Data-Driven Plant Science Education and Exploration

Qitong Li , Raj Nileshbhai Dave , Rhema Amanda Phiri , Leo Zhang , Xiaoyu Zheng , Ariana Blake , Livia Ford , Sarah Jones
show 2 more authors
Susan R. Strickler Nivedita Arora
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords photosynthesisCAM pathwayC3 pathwaygas exchangelow-cost sensorsplant science educationfrugal hardwarein situ monitoring
0
0 comments X

The pith

PhytoBits uses a low-cost CO2 sensor and leaf enclosure to track gas exchange over days and identify C3 versus CAM photosynthetic pathways.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents PhytoBits, a simple toolkit assembled from everyday materials, an off-the-shelf CO2 sensor, and a basic microcontroller. It measures carbon dioxide levels inside a leaf enclosure continuously for multiple days to reveal when a plant is taking up CO2. Validation against professional lab equipment shows the readings correctly separate C3 plants that fix carbon during daylight from CAM plants that do so at night, and it can also detect plants that switch strategies or change with development. This setup aims to make the study of how plants adapt their metabolism accessible for teaching and exploration without expensive instruments.

Core claim

PhytoBits, a frugal in situ gas-exchange sensing toolkit built from accessible materials, an off-the-shelf CO2 sensor, and a low-cost microcontroller, enables multi-day monitoring of plant gas exchange and has been validated against research-grade systems to identify C3 and CAM photosynthetic pathways, including obligate CAM, facultative CAM, and developmental CAM dynamics.

What carries the argument

PhytoBits: a leaf enclosure paired with a low-cost CO2 sensor and microcontroller that records temporal patterns in gas exchange to distinguish photosynthetic strategies by the timing of CO2 uptake.

If this is right

  • Supports multi-day observation of how plants adjust photosynthetic timing in response to environmental changes.
  • Resolves not only fixed pathway types but also facultative switches and developmental shifts in CAM usage.
  • Offers an accessible entry point for educational and preliminary research use where high-end equipment is unavailable.
  • Provides time-series data suitable for later automated classification of pathways.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Widespread classroom adoption could create large shared datasets on plant responses to drought or temperature shifts from non-specialist observers.
  • The time-series CO2 records could serve as a practical bridge for teaching data analysis and programming in biology settings.
  • Similar low-cost enclosures might be adapted to measure additional variables such as humidity or light to study other plant-environment interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The inexpensive CO2 sensor and simple leaf enclosure can capture accurate temporal gas-exchange patterns without meaningful distortion from enclosure effects, sensor drift, or calibration limits that would prevent reliable distinction of photosynthetic pathways.

What would settle it

A side-by-side test on the same plants in which PhytoBits and a research-grade gas-exchange system produce conflicting classifications of C3 or CAM pathway for multiple species or conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26305 by Ariana Blake, Leo Zhang, Livia Ford, Nivedita Arora, Qitong Li, Raj Nileshbhai Dave, Rhema Amanda Phiri, Sarah Jones, Susan R. Strickler, Xiaoyu Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PhytoBits as a frugal plant sensing toolkit, making gas-exchanging plant sensing accessible. (A) A conventional gas-exchange view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (A) light and dark reaction (B-D) CO2 uptake strategies in C3 and CAM plants across day-night cycles. 3.1 Overview of Photosynthetic Reactions Light and carbon fixation fundamentals. Photosynthesis occurs in two stages: light-dependent reactions (in thylakoids) produce ATP and NADPH as energy carriers while splitting water and releasing O2, and the light-independent Calvin cycle (in the stroma) uses ATP an… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative plant species used for physiological comparison. (Left) view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Leaf pod Components and Workflow for assembling leaf pod. (A) Components of the leaf pod enclosure, consisting of a flexible view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (A) When stomata are open, is absorbed by the leaf and water vapor is released, leading to a decrease in CO view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ground-truth measurements for validating PhytoBits-based CO view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (A) PhytoBits’ capture of C3 photosynthesis in E. aureum. CO2 depletion occurs during daytime with concurrent humidity increase. (B) Comparison of PhytoBits and LI-COR 6400 XT measurements. The inverse relationship between LI-COR photosynthetic activity and PhytoBits CO2 concentration validates the result. Environment 1 was a small room where the growth chamber for the plant experiments was placed. The gro… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (A) PhytoBits’ capturing CAM photosynthesis in view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (A) PhytoBits’ capture of Facultative CAM. view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (A) PhytoBits’ capture of C3 photosynthesis in a young leaf of K. pinnata. CO2 depletion occurs during daytime with concurrent humidity increase. (B) PhytoBits’ capture of CAM photosynthesis in a mature leaf of the same plant during the same time. (C) Locations of young and mature leaves in the plant. C3 behavior with CO2 absorption during day time, whereas the mature leaf shows CO2 absorption at night. (… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (A) Effect of human presence on CO2 data in a ventilated room. (B) Effect of human presence on CO2 data in a non-ventilated room. 6.5.2 Watering Regimes and drought stress view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Prior to watering the K. fedtschenkoi, the plant exhibits a CAM-dominated pattern characterized by nocturnal CO2 uptake and nighttime stomatal opening. Following watering, CO2 absorption begins earlier in the photoperiod, indicating a slight shift toward daytime stomatal opening and increased photosynthetic confidence under improved water availability view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Gas-exchange responses of K. fedtschenkoi under (A) Natural Light, and (B) Artificial Light, captured with PhytoBits. 6.5.3 Light Period Manipulation and Reversal. In Environment 1 we performed a controlled light-period inversion to probe circadian entrainment dynamics under a 10:00-22:00 photoperiod (day) and 22:00-10:00 scotoperiod (night). The experiment was conducted on two co-located specimens of E. … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Gas-exchange responses of E. aureum (Pothos) and K. fedtschenkoi under an inverted light schedule, illustrating plant dynamics like delayed reactions captured with PhytoBits. 6.5.4 Natural vs. Artificial Light Conditions view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Robustness of PhytoBits across environments. The same plant species ( view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (A) Time series from A. micholitziana (C3) showing dominant daytime CO2 assimilation and no nocturnal uptake. (B) Time series from A. vera (obligate CAM) showing clear nocturnal CO2 uptake and daytime stomatal closure consistent with CAM physiology. (C) Photographs of the two monitored specimens. To evaluate PhytoBits’ generality across taxonomically and morphologically distinct plants, we monitored a C3 … view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Design Parameters and Functional Capabilities of the PhytoBits Toolkit for Environmental Simulation. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rapid environmental change and advances in data-driven analysis highlight the need not only to use computational tools, but also to foster understanding of the natural world and inspire creativity. Photosynthesis, the process that fuels nearly all life on Earth, provides a compelling context for such learning, particularly in understanding how plants alter their photosynthetic strategies in response to environmental changes. However, existing tools for studying photosynthesis are often inaccessible or limited to demonstrating its presence, rather than capturing its temporal dynamics. We present PhytoBits, a frugal in situ gas-exchange sensing toolkit for distinguishing and teaching photosynthetic strategies. PhytoBits combines leaf enclosure with accessible materials, an off-the-shelf CO2 sensor, and a low-cost microcontroller, to support multi-day monitoring of plant gas-exchange in educational and research contexts. We validated PhytoBits against research-grade gas-exchange systems, confirming that it identifies C3 and CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism) photosynthetic pathways. In addition to obligate CAM, PhytoBits also resolves facultative CAM and developmental CAM dynamics in plants. This work presents an early-stage hardware validation; user deployment studies, open-source code dissemination, and automated pathway classification are planned as future work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents PhytoBits, a low-cost toolkit using a simple leaf enclosure, off-the-shelf CO2 sensor, and microcontroller for multi-day in situ monitoring of plant gas-exchange. It claims that this hardware has been validated against research-grade gas-exchange systems and can distinguish C3 from CAM photosynthetic pathways, including resolution of obligate CAM as well as facultative and developmental CAM dynamics. The work is framed as an early-stage hardware demonstration, with planned future work on open-source dissemination, user studies, and automated classification.

Significance. If the central validation claim can be substantiated with quantitative evidence, the toolkit would offer a genuinely accessible platform for data-driven plant science education and exploration, enabling students and researchers to observe temporal photosynthetic responses that are currently limited to expensive lab equipment. The emphasis on frugal, open components and multi-day monitoring aligns with needs for broader participation in studying plant adaptation to environmental change.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and any validation/results section): The manuscript states that PhytoBits was 'validated against research-grade gas-exchange systems, confirming that it identifies C3 and CAM photosynthetic pathways' and 'resolves facultative CAM and developmental CAM dynamics,' yet supplies no time-series traces, correlation coefficients, classification accuracy, drift or leakage tests, calibration curves, or error metrics to support these distinctions. Without such data it is impossible to evaluate whether sensor resolution, response time, or enclosure boundary-layer effects allow reliable separation of the subtler facultative and developmental cases.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The hardware description would benefit from an explicit bill of materials and assembly diagram to support reproducibility in educational settings.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review, recognition of PhytoBits' potential for accessible plant science education, and clear identification of where the validation evidence needs strengthening. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and any validation/results section): The manuscript states that PhytoBits was 'validated against research-grade gas-exchange systems, confirming that it identifies C3 and CAM photosynthetic pathways' and 'resolves facultative CAM and developmental CAM dynamics,' yet supplies no time-series traces, correlation coefficients, classification accuracy, drift or leakage tests, calibration curves, or error metrics to support these distinctions. Without such data it is impossible to evaluate whether sensor resolution, response time, or enclosure boundary-layer effects allow reliable separation of the subtler facultative and developmental cases.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not supply the quantitative supporting data listed in the comment. The work is explicitly positioned as an early-stage hardware demonstration, so the validation section focuses on feasibility and qualitative pathway separation rather than full metrological characterization. In the revised version we will (1) moderate the abstract language to reflect the preliminary nature of the results, (2) add a dedicated validation subsection containing representative multi-day time-series traces from PhytoBits and a reference LI-COR system for both C3 and CAM species, (3) report correlation coefficients and basic error metrics for CO2 readings, and (4) include descriptions of calibration, drift, and enclosure leakage tests together with sensor response-time specifications. These additions will allow direct assessment of whether the hardware can resolve facultative and developmental CAM dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical hardware validation without derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The manuscript describes a low-cost hardware toolkit (PhytoBits) for in-situ gas-exchange monitoring and asserts empirical validation against external research-grade systems to distinguish C3/CAM pathways, including facultative and developmental cases. No equations, model derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are present; the central claim is a direct hardware comparison to independent benchmarks rather than any internal reduction. No self-citations form load-bearing premises, no ansatzes are smuggled, and no renaming of known results occurs. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work rests on standard assumptions about sensor behavior and plant gas exchange that are external to the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1064 out tokens · 81614 ms · 2026-05-07T13:28:22.887280+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abraham, Hengfu Yin, Anne M

    Paul E. Abraham, Hengfu Yin, Anne M. Borland, Deborah Weighill, Sung Don Lim, Henrique Cestari De Paoli, Nancy Engle, Piet C. Jones, Ryan Agh, David J. Weston, Stan D. Wullschleger, Timothy Tschaplinski, Daniel Jacobson, John C. Cushman, Robert L. Hettich, Gerald A. Tuskan, and Xiaohan Yang. 2016. Transcript, Protein and Metabolite Temporal Dynamics in th...

    work page doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.178 2016

  2. [2]

    2023.EZO-O2 Embedded Oxygen Sensor Circuit Datasheet

    Atlas Scientific. 2023.EZO-O2 Embedded Oxygen Sensor Circuit Datasheet. Technical Report. Atlas Scientific. https://files.atlas-scientific.com/EZO- O2-S-datasheet.pdf Accessed: 2026-02-02

    2023

  3. [3]

    Yusuf Abdullahi Badamasi. 2014. The working principle of an Arduino. In2014 11th international conference on electronics, computer and computation (ICECCO). IEEE, 1–4

    2014

  4. [4]

    Liane Becker and Daniel C Dreesmann. 2024. Ecology Lessons 2.0–A Wireless Approach: The Impact of Using Wireless Sensors and Mobile Devices in Ecology Instruction.The American Biology Teacher86, 1 (2024), 16–23

    2024

  5. [5]

    AA Benson, JA Bassham, Mo Calvin, To Co Goodale, VA Haas, and Wo Stepka. 1950. The path of carbon in photosynthesis. v. paper chromatography and radioautography of the products.Journal of the American Chemical Society72, 4 (1950), 1710–1718

    1950

  6. [6]

    M Saad Bhamla, Brandon Benson, Chew Chai, Georgios Katsikis, Aanchal Johri, and Manu Prakash. 2017. Hand-powered ultralow-cost paper centrifuge.Nature Biomedical Engineering1, 1 (2017), 0009

    2017

  7. [7]

    Rick Bonney, Caren B Cooper, Janis Dickinson, Steve Kelling, Tina Phillips, Kenneth V Rosenberg, and Jennifer Shirk. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy.BioScience59, 11 (2009), 977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

    work page doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9 2009

  8. [8]

    Busch, Elizabeth A

    Florian A. Busch, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Anna Amtmann, Amanda P. Cavanagh, Steven M. Driever, John N. Ferguson, Johannes Kromdijk, Tracy Lawson, Andrew D. B. Leakey, Jack S. A. Matthews, Katherine Meacham-Hensold, Richard L. Vath, Silvere Vialet-Chabrand, Berkley J. Walker, and Maria Papanatsiou. 2024. A Guide to Photosynthetic Gas Exchange Measurements:...

    work page doi:10.1111/pce.14815 2024

  9. [9]

    Gaurav Byagathvalli, Elio J Challita, and M Saad Bhamla. 2021. Frugal science powered by curiosity.Industrial & engineering chemistry research60, 44 (2021), 15874–15884

    2021

  10. [10]

    Caird, James H

    Mairgareth A. Caird, James H. Richards, and Lisa A. Donovan. 2007. Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C 3 and C4 plants.Plant Physiology143, 1 (Jan 2007), 4–10. doi:10.1104/pp.106.092940 PMID: 17210908; PMCID: PMC1761996

    work page doi:10.1104/pp.106.092940 2007

  11. [11]

    Guillem Camprodon, Óscar González, Víctor Barberán, Máximo Pérez, Viktor Smári, Miguel Ángel de Heras, and Alejandro Bizzotto. 2019. Smart Citizen Kit and Station: An open environmental monitoring system for citizen participation and scientific experimentation.HardwareX6 (2019), e00070. doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00070 2019

  12. [12]

    Linda Chalker-Scott. 1999. Environmental Significance of Anthocyanins in Plant Stress Responses.Photochemistry and Photobiology70, 1 (1999), 1–9. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x 26 Li et al

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x 1999

  13. [13]

    Kristofer Chan, Daniel N Schillereff, Andreas CW Baas, Michael A Chadwick, Bruce Main, Mark Mulligan, Francis T O’Shea, Reagan Pearce, Thomas EL Smith, Arnout van Soesbergen, et al. 2021. Low-cost electronic sensors for environmental research: Pitfalls and opportunities.Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment45, 3 (2021), 305–338. doi:10.117...

    work page doi:10.1177/0309133320956567 2021

  14. [14]

    Ranveer Chandra, Manohar Swaminathan, Tusher Chakraborty, Jian Ding, Zerina Kapetanovic, Peeyush Kumar, and Deepak Vasisht. 2022. Democratizing data-driven agriculture using affordable hardware.IEEE Micro42, 1 (2022), 69–77

    2022

  15. [15]

    2024.CI-340 Hand-held Photosynthesis System

    CID Bio-Science Inc. 2024.CI-340 Hand-held Photosynthesis System. Camas, Washington, USA. https://cid-inc.com/plant-science-tools/ photosynthesis-measurement-plants/ci-340-handheld-photosynthesis-system/

    2024

  16. [16]

    Marvin Collins, Matthew B Lau, William Ma, Aidan Shen, Brenda Wang, Sa Cai, Marie La Russa, Michael C Jewett, and Lei S Qi. 2024. A frugal CRISPR kit for equitable and accessible education in gene editing and synthetic biology.Nature Communications15, 1 (2024), 6563

    2024

  17. [17]

    Nicola Coppedè, Michela Janni, Manuele Bettelli, Calogero Leandro Maida, Francesco Gentile, Marco Villani, Roberta Ruotolo, Salvatore Iannotta, Nelson Marmiroli, Marta Marmiroli, and Andrea Zappettini. 2017. An in Vivo Biosensing, Biomimetic Electrochemical Transistor with Applications in Plant Science and Precision Farming.Scientific Reports7, 1 (Nov. 20...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16217-4 2017

  18. [18]

    James S Cybulski, James Clements, and Manu Prakash. 2014. Foldscope: origami-based paper microscope.PloS one9, 6 (2014), e98781

    2014

  19. [19]

    Lilian De Greef, Mayank Goel, Min Joon Seo, Eric C Larson, James W Stout, James A Taylor, and Shwetak N Patel. 2014. Bilicam: using mobile phones to monitor newborn jaundice. InProceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 331–342

    2014

  20. [20]

    Gabrielsson, Magnus Berggren, Daniel T

    Chiara Diacci, Tayebeh Abedi, Jee Woong Lee, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Magnus Berggren, Daniel T. Simon, Totte Niittylä, and Eleni Stavrinidou. 2021. Diurnalin VivoXylem Sap Glucose and Sucrose Monitoring Using Implantable Organic Electrochemical Transistor Sensors.iScience24, 1 (Jan. 2021), 101966. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101966

    work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101966 2021

  21. [21]

    Zalim Islamovich Dudarov, Amiran Khabidovich Zanilov, Yuri Kambulatovich Altudov, and Yuri Khasanovich Shogenov. 2025. Influence of external factors on the behavior of CO2 in the root system of plants in a model experiment.Carbon Research4, 1 (2025), 1–15

    2025

  22. [22]

    Erika J Edwards. 2019. Evolutionary trajectories, accessibility and other metaphors: the case of C 4 and CAM photosynthesis.New Phytologist223, 4 (2019), 1742–1755

    2019

  23. [23]

    PubChem Compound Database

    National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Database. [n. d.]. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 525, Malic Acid. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Malic-Acid

  24. [24]

    Yasmina Frey, Stefanie Dumberger, Simon Haberstroh, Christiane Werner, and Ulrike Wallrabe. 2025. The ECOvette: Unveiling Plant Dynamics Through Direct Leaf Emission Analysis.ACS ES&T Engineering5, 11 (Nov. 2025), 3096–3106. doi:10.1021/acsestengg.5c00462

    work page doi:10.1021/acsestengg.5c00462 2025

  25. [25]

    Poojita Garg, Mingzhuo Ma, Hayley Jane MacKinnon, Michael Richley, Vikram Iyer, Shwetak Patel, and Alexander T Adams. 2025. DopFone: Doppler-Based Fetal Heart Rate Estimation Using Commodity Smartphones.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies9, 4 (2025), 1–24

    2025

  26. [26]

    Francesco Gentile, Filippo Vurro, Michela Janni, Riccardo Manfredi, Francesco Cellini, Angelo Petrozza, Andrea Zappettini, and Nicola Coppedè

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1002/aelm.202200092

    A Biomimetic, Biocompatible OECT Sensor for the Real-Time Measurement of Concentration and Saturation of Ions in Plant Sap.Advanced Electronic Materials8, 10 (2022), 2200092. doi:10.1002/aelm.202200092

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202200092 2022

  28. [28]

    Larson, Gaetano Borriello, and Shwetak N

    Mayank Goel, Elliot Saba, Maia Stiber, Eric Whitmire, Josh Fromm, Eric C. Larson, Gaetano Borriello, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2016. SpiroCall: Measuring Lung Function over a Phone Call. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Santa Clara, California, USA)(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5675–5685. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858401

    work page doi:10.1145/2858036.2858401 2016

  29. [29]

    Hiba Habeeb, Edappayil Janeeshma, and Jos Puthur. 2021. Dynamic alterations of metabolites in Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. to encounter drought and Zn toxicity.Brazilian Journal of Botany44 (08 2021). doi:10.1007/s40415-021-00738-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s40415-021-00738-4 2021

  30. [30]

    Harris and PlantingScience

    M. Harris and PlantingScience. 2017. Investigating Photosynthesis: Spinach and Corn. PlantingScience Online Research Gallery. https:// plantingscience.org/projects/mmhsharrisfall2017project10 Accessed: 2024-05-22

    2017

  31. [31]

    Karolina Heyduk, Edward V McAssey, and Jim Leebens-Mack. 2022. Differential timing of gene expression and recruitment in independent origins of CAM in the Agavoideae (Asparagaceae).New Phytologist235, 5 (2022), 2111–2126

    2022

  32. [32]

    Khidir W Hilu and John L Randall. 1984. Convenient method for studying grass leaf epidermis.Taxon33, 3 (1984), 413–415

    1984

  33. [33]

    Rongbin Hu, Jin Zhang, Sara Jawdy, Avinash Sreedasyam, Anna Lipzen, Mei Wang, Vivian Ng, Christopher Daum, Keykhosrow Keymanesh, Degao Liu, et al. 2024. Transcriptomic Analysis of the CAM Species Kalanchoë fedtschenkoi Under Low-and High-Temperature Regimes.Plants13, 23 (2024), 3444

    2024

  34. [34]

    K Hubick and Graham Farquhar. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis.Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology(1989)

    1989

  35. [35]

    Stephen Hunt. 2003. Measurements of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants.Physiologia Plantarum117, 3 (2003), 314–325. doi:10.1034/j.1399- 3054.2003.00055.x

    work page doi:10.1034/j.1399- 2003

  36. [36]

    2025.PhytoPulse: Visualising Hidden Respiration Cycle

    Instructables. 2025.PhytoPulse: Visualising Hidden Respiration Cycle. https://www.instructables.com/PhytoPulse-Visualising-Hidden-Respiration- Cycle/

    2025

  37. [37]

    Kateřina Jančaříková and Antonín Jančařík. 2022. How to Teach Photosynthesis? A Review of Academic Research.Sustainability14, 20 (2022). doi:10.3390/su142013529

    work page doi:10.3390/su142013529 2022

  38. [38]

    Matthew P. Johnson. 2016. Photosynthesis.Essays in Biochemistry60 (Oct 31 2016), 255–273. Issue 3. doi:10.1042/EBC20160016

    work page doi:10.1042/ebc20160016 2016

  39. [39]

    Kim, Mi-Jeong Jeong, and Choong-Min Ryu

    Jihye Jung, Seon-Kyu Kim, Joo Y. Kim, Mi-Jeong Jeong, and Choong-Min Ryu. 2018. Beyond Chemical Triggers: Evidence for Sound-Evoked Physiological Reactions in Plants.Frontiers in Plant Science9 (2018), 25. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00025 Towards a Frugal Photosynthesis Sensing Toolkit for Data-Driven Plant Science Education and Exploration 27

    work page doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00025 2018

  40. [40]

    Alan C. Kay. 1984. Computer Software.Scientific American251, 3 (1984), 52–59

    1984

  41. [41]

    Jon E Keeley and Philip W Rundel. 2003. Evolution of CAM and C4 carbon-concentrating mechanisms.International journal of plant sciences164, S3 (2003), S55–S77

    2003

  42. [42]

    Wenwen Kong, Mi-Jeong Yoo, Dan Zhu, Jerald D Noble, Theresa M Kelley, Jing Li, Matias Kirst, Sarah M Assmann, and Sixue Chen. 2020. Molecular changes in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum guard cells underlying the C3 to CAM transition.Plant molecular biology103, 6 (2020), 653–667

    2020

  43. [43]

    Chaoqun Li, Wenting Han, Manman Peng, and Mengfei Zhang. 2020. Developing an automated gas sampling chamber for measuring variations in CO2 exchange in a maize ecosystem at night.Sensors20, 21 (2020), 6117

    2020

  44. [44]

    2011.Using the LI-6400/LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System(10th ed.)

    LI-COR Biosciences Inc. 2011.Using the LI-6400/LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System(10th ed.). Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. https://www.licor. com/env/support/LI-6400/manuals.html

    2011

  45. [45]

    2024.LI-6800 Portable Photosynthesis System

    LI-COR Biosciences Inc. 2024.LI-6800 Portable Photosynthesis System. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. https://www.licor.com/products/photosynthesis/LI- 6800

    2024

  46. [46]

    An Long, Jiang Zhang, Lin-Tong Yang, Xin Ye, Ning-Wei Lai, Ling-Ling Tan, Dan Lin, and Li-Song Chen. 2017. Effects of Low pH on Photosynthesis, Related Physiological Parameters, and Nutrient Profiles of Citrus.Frontiers in Plant Science8 (2017), 185. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00185

    work page doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00185 2017

  47. [47]

    Danli Luo and Nadya Peek. 2022. Demonstrating a Fabricatable Bioreactor Toolkit for Small-Scale Biochemical Automation. InAdjunct Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–3

    2022

  48. [48]

    Hakim Manghwar, Amjad Hussain, Intikhab Alam, Muneer Ahmed Khoso, Qurban Ali, and Fen Liu. 2024. Waterlogging stress in plants: Unraveling the mechanisms and impacts on growth, development, and productivity.Environmental and Experimental Botany224 (2024), 105824. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105824

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105824 2024

  49. [49]

    Microsoft. 2025. FarmBeats for Students. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/educator-center/instructor-materials/farmbeats-for-students. Accessed: 2026-01-29

    2025

  50. [50]

    Ray Ming, Robert VanBuren, Ching Man Wai, Haibao Tang, Michael C Schatz, John E Bowers, Eric Lyons, Ming-Li Wang, Jung Chen, Eric Biggers, Jisen Zhang, Lixian Huang, Lingmao Zhang, Wenjing Miao, Jian Zhang, Zhangyao Ye, Chenyong Miao, Zhicong Lin, Hao Wang, Hongye Zhou, Won C Yim, Henry D Priest, Chunfang Zheng, Margaret Woodhouse, Patrick P Edger, Romain...

    work page doi:10.1038/ng.3435 2015

  51. [51]

    Alisher Mirzabaev, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Toshihiro Hasegawa, Prajal Pradhan, Anita Wreford, Maria Cristina Tirado von der Pahlen, and Helen Gurney-Smith. 2023. Severe climate change risks to food security and nutrition.Climate Risk Management39 (2023), 100473

    2023

  52. [52]

    Joanna M Nassar, Sherjeel M Khan, Diego Rosas Villalva, Maha M Nour, Amani S Almuslem, and Muhammad M Hussain. 2018. Compliant plant wearables for localized microclimate and plant growth monitoring.npj Flexible Electronics2, 1 (2018), 24

    2018

  53. [53]

    Thi Thuc Nguyen, Ariel Altman, Laibin Huang, Jorge L Mazza Rodrigues, Helen E Dahlke, Nina A Kamennaya, and Elad Levintal. 2025. A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration.Soil Science Society of America Journal89, 1 (2025), e20800

    2025

  54. [54]

    PS Nobel. 1996. High productivity of certain agronomic CAM species. InCrassulacean acid metabolism: biochemistry, ecophysiology and evolution. Springer, 255–265

    1996

  55. [55]

    Salvador Nogués, Iker Aranjuelo, Antoni Pardo, and Joaquim Azcón-Bieto. 2008. Assessing the stable carbon isotopic composition of intercellular CO2 in a CAM plant using gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry.Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry22, 7 (2008), 1017–1022

    2008

  56. [56]

    Michael Oellermann, Jolle W Jolles, Diego Ortiz, Rui Seabra, Tobias Wenzel, Hannah Wilson, and Richelle L Tanner. 2022. Open hardware in science: the benefits of open electronics.Integrative and Comparative Biology62, 4 (2022), 1061–1075. doi:10.1093/icb/icac043

    work page doi:10.1093/icb/icac043 2022

  57. [57]

    CB Osmond, Klaus Winter, and H Ziegler. 1982. Functional significance of different pathways of CO2 fixation in photosynthesis. InPhysiological plant ecology II: Water relations and carbon assimilation. Springer, 479–547

    1982

  58. [58]

    PASCO Scientific Inc. 2026. Wireless CO2 Sensor (PS-3208) Product Documentation. https://www.pasco.com/products/sensors/wireless/wireless- carbon-dioxide-sensor

    2026

  59. [59]

    Joshua M Pearce. 2012. Building research equipment with free, open-source hardware.Science337, 6100 (2012), 1303–1304. doi:10.1126/science.1228183

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1228183 2012

  60. [60]

    2024.TARGAS-1 Portable Photosynthesis System

    PP Systems. 2024.TARGAS-1 Portable Photosynthesis System. Amesbury, Massachusetts, USA. https://ppsystems.com/targas-1/

    2024

  61. [61]

    Shuo Qiu, Ke Xia, Yanni Yang, Qiaofen Wu, and Zhiguo Zhao. 2023. Mechanisms underlying the C3–CAM photosynthetic shift in facultative CAM plants.Horticulturae9, 3 (2023), 398

    2023

  62. [62]

    Qubit Systems Inc. 2020. Q-Box CO650 Enhanced Plant CO 2 Analysis Package Manual. https://www.cienytec.com/PDF/qubit-Q-Box-CO650- manual-2020-03.pdf

    2020

  63. [63]

    1991.Tools for thought

    Howard Rheingold and Michael Toms. 1991.Tools for thought. New Dimensions Foundation

    1991

  64. [64]

    2025.Ribbit Network: Open-Source CO 2 Monitoring

    Ribbit Network. 2025.Ribbit Network: Open-Source CO 2 Monitoring. https://www.ribbitnetwork.org

    2025

  65. [65]

    Brian E Saccardi, Ashlee L Dere, Allison E Goodwell, Jennifer Druhan, Lisa R Welp, Neal E Blair, Erin Bauer, James Haken, Martha E Jimenez- Castaneda, Timothy Filley, et al. 2025. A low-power, low-cost, chamber-based CO2 sensor.Frontiers in Water7 (2025), 1638540. 28 Li et al

    2025

  66. [66]

    Sensirion AG

    Sensirion AG 2023.SCD4x CO 2 Sensor Datasheet. Sensirion AG. https://sensirion.com/media/documents/48C4B7FB/64C134E7/Sensirion_SCD4x_ Datasheet.pdf Version 1.5

    2023

  67. [67]

    Creating Cool Stuff

    Sue Sentance, Jane Waite, Steve Hodges, Emily MacLeod, and Lucy Yeomans. 2017. " Creating Cool Stuff" Pupils’ Experience of the BBC micro: bit. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. 531–536

    2017

  68. [68]

    Sue Sentance, Jane Waite, Steve Hodges, Emily MacLeod, and Lynne E Yeomans. 2017. Teaching with physical computing devices: the BBC micro: bit initiative. InProceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 87–96. doi:10.1145/3137065.3137083

    work page doi:10.1145/3137065.3137083 2017

  69. [69]

    Hiroo Takaragawa, Tomoki Asahi, Muneshi Mitsuoka, Eizo Taira, and Yoshinobu Kawamitsu. 2025. Establishment of a low-cost photosynthesis measurement system based on a single-board microcomputer and CO2 sensors.Photosynthesis research163, 5 (2025), 52

    2025

  70. [70]

    A-C Tang, Y Kawamitsu, M Kanechi, and John S Boyer. 2002. Photosynthetic oxygen evolution at low water potential in leaf discs lacking an epidermis.Annals of Botany89, 7 (2002), 861–870

    2002

  71. [71]

    Ignacius YY Tay, Kristoforus Bryant Odang, and CY Maurice Cheung. 2021. Metabolic modeling of the C3-CAM continuum revealed the establishment of a starch/sugar-malate cycle in CAM evolution.Frontiers in Plant Science11 (2021), 573197

    2021

  72. [72]

    Martin Thalheimer. 2022. A Leaf-Mounted Capacitance Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of Foliar Transpiration and Solar Irradiance as an Indicator of Plant Water Status.Journal of Agricultural Engineering(Nov. 2022). doi:10.4081/jae.2022.1477

    work page doi:10.4081/jae.2022.1477 2022

  73. [73]

    2024.Carbon Dioxide Sensor and Low-Cost Light Sensors for Indoor Agriculture

    UCSC S-lab. 2024.Carbon Dioxide Sensor and Low-Cost Light Sensors for Indoor Agriculture. https://slab.sites.ucsc.edu/co2sensor/ Combined with CTAHR Hawaii technical report FST-68

    2024

  74. [74]

    Vernier Software & Technology. 2026. Photosynthesis and Respiration (O2) Experiment (AWV-12C). https://www.vernier.com/experiment/awv- 12c_photosynthesis-and-respiration-o2/

    2026

  75. [75]

    Ching M Wai, Robert VanBuren, Jisen Zhang, Lixian Huang, Wenjing Miao, Patrick P Edger, Won C Yim, Henry D Priest, Blake C Meyers, Todd Mockler, et al. 2017. Temporal and spatial transcriptomic and micro RNA dynamics of CAM photosynthesis in pineapple.The Plant Journal92, 1 (2017), 19–30

    2017

  76. [76]

    Klaus Winter. 2019. Ecophysiology of constitutive and facultative CAM photosynthesis.Journal of experimental botany70, 22 (2019), 6495–6508

    2019

  77. [77]

    Klaus Winter and Joseph A. M. Holtum. 2014. Facultative crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants: powerful tools for unravelling the functional elements of CAM photosynthesis.Journal of Experimental Botany65, 13 (03 2014), 3425–3441. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru063

    work page doi:10.1093/jxb/eru063 2014

  78. [78]

    Klaus Winter and J Andrew C Smith. 2022. CAM photosynthesis: the acid test.New Phytologist233, 2 (2022), 599–609

    2022

  79. [79]

    Klaus Winter, Aurelio Virgo, Milton Garcia, Jorge Aranda, and Joseph AM Holtum. 2020. Constitutive and facultative crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) in Cuban oregano, Coleus amboinicus (Lamiaceae).Functional Plant Biology48, 7 (2020), 647–654

    2020

  80. [80]

    Shihao Wu, Yiheng Li, Qiannian Wang, Yinmin Cai, Peicheng Teng, Wenlong Li, Feilong Zhang, Li-Ping Xu, and Shutao Wang. 2025. Wearable Plant Sensing Devices for Health Monitoring.Wearable Electronics(2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.