pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26480 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Large magnetoresistance and weak-antilocalization in the nodal-line semimetal VP2

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 10:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords nodal-line semimetalmagnetoresistanceweak antilocalizationKondo effectVP2Lorentz forcetopological transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

VP2 is a type-II nodal-line semimetal whose intrinsic band structure produces large linear non-saturating magnetoresistance dominated by the Lorentz force.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors grew high-quality VP2 single crystals and measured their longitudinal and Hall resistivities across temperatures and magnetic fields, pairing the data with first-principles band and Fermi-surface calculations. These calculations identify VP2 as a type-II nodal-line semimetal, a conclusion reinforced by the Hall resistivity. At higher fields the magnetoresistance rises linearly without saturation, reaching 170 percent at 40 K and 9 T; anisotropy measurements and numerical simulations tie this behavior to the material’s electronic structure and Lorentz force rather than extrinsic scattering. Small concentrations of magnetic V4+ impurities produce a Kondo effect in zero-field resistivity, while low-field conductivity displays weak antilocalization. The work therefore presents VP2 as a platform for examining topological transport in the presence of magnetic impurities.

Core claim

Band calculations reveal that VP2 is a type-II nodal-line semimetal, evidenced by the Hall resistivity measurements. The magnetoresistance at higher magnetic fields exhibits a linear behavior and does not show any sign of saturation, reaching 170% at 40 K up to 9 T, which is determined by the intrinsic electronic structure and dominated by the Lorenz force, demonstrated by the resistivity anisotropy measurements and the numerical simulations. The existence of small amount magnetic impurities results in Kondo effect emerging in resistivity, while the conductivity at lower magnetic fields exhibits a typical weak anti-localization behavior.

What carries the argument

The linear non-saturating magnetoresistance generated by the type-II nodal-line electronic structure, whose Lorentz-force origin is isolated through resistivity anisotropy and numerical simulations.

If this is right

  • The magnetoresistance remains linear and unsaturated because it is fixed by the material’s band structure rather than by scattering details.
  • Resistivity anisotropy directly tracks the Lorentz-force contribution across crystal orientations.
  • Numerical simulations reproduce the measured linear MR when only the calculated Fermi surface is used.
  • Weak antilocalization appears at low fields due to the topological band features.
  • Magnetic impurities coexist with the topological states and produce a measurable Kondo effect without destroying the linear MR.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar linear MR should appear in other type-II nodal-line semimetals once their Fermi-surface anisotropy is mapped.
  • Controlling the density of V4+ impurities could tune the interplay between Kondo scattering and weak antilocalization while preserving the linear MR.
  • The same anisotropy test used here can be applied to distinguish Lorentz-dominated MR from inhomogeneity-driven MR in related topological materials.

Load-bearing premise

The observed linear magnetoresistance is purely intrinsic and dominated by the Lorentz force without significant contributions from scattering mechanisms or sample inhomogeneity.

What would settle it

Saturation of the magnetoresistance at fields well above 9 T in cleaner crystals, or anisotropy data that fail to match Lorentz-force predictions, would falsify the claim of intrinsic linear behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26480 by Chunxiang Wu, Hangdong Wang, Jianhua Du, Jianjian Jia, Jinhu Yang, Le Liu, Minghu Fang, Shuijin Chen, Tingyu Zhou, Xin Peng, Xinyu Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Crystal structure of VP2. (b) XRD pattern of a VP2 polycrystal crystal. Inset: an image of typical single crystals. (c) XRD pattern of a VP2 single crystal. Inset: EDS data of a cleaved sample surface. (d) The calculated Fermi surface of VP2 (e) The nodal-line in first Brillouin zone without considering SOC. (f) high symmetry points in the reciprocal primitive cell. (g) and (k) Fatband calculated witho… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Temperature dependence of resistivity. (b) view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Temperature dependence of resistivity of view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Angular dependence of resistivity ρxx at 2 K for different magnetic fields rotated in the a−c plane. (b) MR as a function of magnetic field magnitude for θ = 0◦ , 30◦ , 60◦ , and 90◦ at 10 K. Inset: Schematic of magnetic field orientation. (c) Calculated angular dependence of MR at Bτ = 4. (d) Calculated MR for θ = 0◦ . ∆σxx(B) = − αe2 πℏ [ Ψ ( 1 2 + ℏ 4elϕ 2B ) − ln ( ℏ 4elϕ 2B )] (4) where α is a pre… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

After growing successfully high quality VP$_2$ single crystals, we studied systematically their longitudinal $\rho_{xx}(T)$ and Hall resistivity $\rho_{yx}(T)$ at various magnetic fields, combining the electronic band and Fermi surface (FS) calculations. Band calculations reveal that VP$_2$ is a type-II nodal-line semimetal, evidenced by the Hall resistivity measurements. It is found that the magnetoresistance (MR) at higher magnetic fields exhibits a linear behavior and does not show any sign of saturation, reaching 170\% at 40 K up to 9 T, which is determined by the intrinsic electronic structure and dominated by the Lorenz force, demonstrated by the resistivity anisotropy measurements and the numerical simulations. We also found that the existence of small amount magnetic impurities (V$^{4+}$, $S=1/2$, 2.24\%) results in Kondo effect emerging in $\rho_{xx}(T)$, the conductivity at lower magnetic fields exhibits a typical weak anti-localization (WAL) behavior. These results illustrate that VP$_2$ is a platform to study the electronic transport properties of a topological material containing magnetic impurities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports successful growth of high-quality VP2 single crystals identified as a type-II nodal-line semimetal through first-principles band calculations and Hall resistivity data. It presents large non-saturating linear magnetoresistance reaching 170% at 40 K and 9 T, attributed to the intrinsic electronic structure and Lorentz-force dominance as demonstrated by resistivity anisotropy measurements and numerical simulations. The authors additionally report a Kondo effect from ~2.24% V^{4+} (S=1/2) magnetic impurities and weak antilocalization (WAL) in low-field conductivity, positioning VP2 as a platform for studying topological transport with impurities.

Significance. If the linear MR is rigorously shown to be intrinsic and Lorentz-dominated without significant inhomogeneity or disorder contributions, the work would provide a concrete example of classical transport in a nodal-line semimetal coexisting with Kondo physics and WAL. This could be useful for disentangling topological versus conventional scattering mechanisms, especially given the explicit impurity concentration and the combination of anisotropy data with simulations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and high-field MR results] Abstract and high-field MR results section: the central claim that the non-saturating linear MR (170% at 40 K, 9 T) is 'determined by the intrinsic electronic structure and dominated by the Lorenz force' rests on resistivity anisotropy and unspecified numerical simulations. Anisotropy alone does not quantitatively exclude current-jetting, mobility-fluctuation, or direction-dependent scattering contributions, and the simulations are not shown to reproduce the data only when inhomogeneity is set to zero or to include the reported 2.24% magnetic impurities.
  2. [Hall resistivity analysis] Hall resistivity and band-structure comparison: the statement that Hall data 'evidences' the type-II nodal-line semimetal lacks reported error bars on carrier densities/mobility, fitting details, or direct quantitative comparison (e.g., calculated vs. measured FS pockets), which is load-bearing for confirming the intrinsic band origin of the MR.
  3. [Low-field conductivity and WAL] Low-field WAL section: the conductivity is said to exhibit 'typical weak anti-localization (WAL) behavior,' yet no fit to the Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka formula (or equivalent), extracted phase-coherence length, or discussion of how the V^{4+} impurities affect dephasing is provided, undermining assessment of the topological contribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. Throughout: 'Lorenz force' should be corrected to 'Lorentz force'.
  2. Figure captions and methods: raw data, error bars, and simulation parameters (e.g., disorder strength, temperature, field range) are not described, reducing reproducibility.
  3. Kondo-effect paragraph: the 2.24% impurity concentration is stated but the resistivity upturn fitting range, characteristic temperature, and separation from WAL are not detailed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate where revisions will be made to clarify and strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and high-field MR results] Abstract and high-field MR results section: the central claim that the non-saturating linear MR (170% at 40 K, 9 T) is 'determined by the intrinsic electronic structure and dominated by the Lorenz force' rests on resistivity anisotropy and unspecified numerical simulations. Anisotropy alone does not quantitatively exclude current-jetting, mobility-fluctuation, or direction-dependent scattering contributions, and the simulations are not shown to reproduce the data only when inhomogeneity is set to zero or to include the reported 2.24% magnetic impurities.

    Authors: We agree that additional details are required to make the claim fully rigorous. In the revised manuscript we will expand the numerical simulations section to specify the model (including the calculated band structure and Fermi-surface parameters), show explicit comparisons of the simulated MR with and without inhomogeneity, and discuss the expected influence of the low (2.24 %) V^{4+} impurity concentration on the high-field linear MR. The measured resistivity anisotropy remains a key supporting observation: the MR is strongly suppressed when the field is aligned along the nodal-line direction, a directional dependence that is difficult to reconcile with current-jetting or isotropic mobility fluctuations but is naturally explained by the Lorentz force acting on the anisotropic Fermi surface. We will therefore retain the original interpretation while providing the quantitative backing requested. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hall resistivity analysis] Hall resistivity and band-structure comparison: the statement that Hall data 'evidences' the type-II nodal-line semimetal lacks reported error bars on carrier densities/mobility, fitting details, or direct quantitative comparison (e.g., calculated vs. measured FS pockets), which is load-bearing for confirming the intrinsic band origin of the MR.

    Authors: We will add the missing quantitative information. Error bars on the extracted carrier densities and mobilities will be reported, the two-band fitting procedure (including temperature dependence and field range) will be described in the methods, and a table or supplementary figure will directly compare the calculated Fermi-surface pocket volumes and carrier concentrations with the values obtained from Hall resistivity. These additions will make the link between the measured Hall data and the type-II nodal-line character explicit. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Low-field conductivity and WAL] Low-field WAL section: the conductivity is said to exhibit 'typical weak anti-localization (WAL) behavior,' yet no fit to the Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka formula (or equivalent), extracted phase-coherence length, or discussion of how the V^{4+} impurities affect dephasing is provided, undermining assessment of the topological contribution.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative WAL analysis is needed. In the revision we will fit the low-field magnetoconductivity to the Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka formula, extract and plot the phase-coherence length versus temperature, and add a brief discussion of how the dilute V^{4+} (S = 1/2) magnetic impurities are expected to contribute to dephasing while still permitting the observed WAL signature. This will allow readers to assess the relative weight of topological versus impurity-driven scattering. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on independent experimental observables and external band calculations

full rationale

The paper reports measured linear MR (170% at 40 K, 9 T) and WAL, attributing the former to intrinsic nodal-line structure and Lorentz force via resistivity anisotropy data plus numerical simulations from separate DFT/FS calculations. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the MR or WAL to quantities defined by the same transport data. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks: anisotropy is a distinct observable, and band calculations are first-principles inputs not fitted to the MR curves. This matches the default non-circular case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; ledger entries are inferred from stated claims. No explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced beyond standard interpretations of Hall data and band structure.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DFT band calculations accurately capture the type-II nodal-line semimetal character of VP2
    Invoked to interpret Hall resistivity as evidence for the topological state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1431 out tokens · 84684 ms · 2026-05-07T10:58:37.666047+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized anomalous hall effect in magnetic topological insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010)

  2. [2]

    Shekhar, A

    C. Shekhar, A. K. Nayak, Y. Sun, M. P. Schmidt, M. Nicklas, I. Leermakers, U. Zeitler, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Schnelle, J. Grin, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Ex- tremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological weyl semimetal candidate NbP, Nature Physics 11, 645 (2015)

  3. [3]

    M. N. Ali, J. W. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q. D. Gib- son, L. M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Large, non- saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2, Nature 514, 205 (2014)

  4. [4]

    B. Feng, B. Fu, S. Kasamatsu, S. Ito, P. Cheng, C.-C. Liu, Y. Feng, S. Wu, S. K. Mahatha, P. M. Sheverdyaeva, P. Moras, M. Arita, O. Sugino, T.-C. Chiang, K. Shi- mada, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, K. Wu, L. Chen, Y. Yao, and I. Matsuda, Experimental realization of two-dimensional dirac nodal line fermions in monolayer Cu2Si, Nature Communications 8 (2017). 7

  5. [5]

    D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of weyl metals, Phys. Rev. B 88, 104412 (2013)

  6. [6]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced neg- ative magnetoresistance in 3d weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015)

  7. [7]

    Shrestha, M

    K. Shrestha, M. Chou, D. Graf, H. D. Yang, B. Lorenz, and C. W. Chu, Extremely large nonsaturating magne- toresistance and ultrahigh mobility due to topological surface states in the metallic Bi 2Te3 topological insula- tor, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195113 (2017)

  8. [8]

    S. K. Pradhan, S. Pradhan, P. Mal, P. Rambabu, A. Lakhani, B. Das, B. L. Chittari, R. Mondal, V. K. Malik, G. R. Turpu, and P. Das, Dirac nodal line behav- ior in a zintl-phase CaZn 2Sb2 single crystal, Phys. Rev. B 111, 195115 (2025)

  9. [9]

    Muhammad, G

    Z. Muhammad, G. Hussain, R. Islam, N. Zawadzka, M. S. Hossain, O. Iqbal, A. Babiński, M. R. Molas, F. Xue, Y. Zhang, M. Z. Hasan, and W. Zhao, Electronic transport and interaction of lattice dynamics in topolog- ical nodalline semimetal HfAs2 single crystals, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2316775 (2024)

  10. [10]

    T. Zhou, M. Tong, X. Xie, Y. Yu, X. Zhu, Z.-Y. Wang, and T. Jiang, Quantum transport signatures of a close candidate for a type ii nodal-line semimetal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 6475 (2020)

  11. [11]

    Chen, H.-Z

    W. Chen, H.-Z. Lu, and O. Zilberberg, Weak localization and antilocalization in nodal-line semimetals: Dimen- sionality and topological effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 196603 (2019)

  12. [12]

    M.-X. Yang, W. Luo, and W. Chen, Quantum trans- port in topological nodal-line semimetals, Advances in Physics: X 7, 2065216 (2022)

  13. [13]

    B. Wang, B. Singh, B. Ghosh, W.-C. Chiu, M. M. Ho- sen, Q. Zhang, L. Ying, M. Neupane, A. Agarwal, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, Topological crystalline insulator state with type-ii dirac fermions in transition metal dipnictides, Phys. Rev. B 100, 205118 (2019)

  14. [14]

    J. Mi, S. Xu, S. Li, C. Jiang, Z. Li, Q. Tao, and Z.-A. Xu, Extremely large magnetoresistance and chiral anomaly in the nodal-line semimetal ZrAs2, Frontiers of Physics 20, 034203 (2025)

  15. [15]

    Y. Luo, R. D. McDonald, P. F. S. Rosa, B. L. Scott, N. A. Wakeham, N. J. Ghimire, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thomp- son, and F. Ronning, Anomalous electronic structure and magnetoresistance in TaAs2, Scientific Reports 6 (2016)

  16. [16]

    X. Liu, J. Wang, W. You, T. Wang, H. Yang, W. Jiao, H. Mao, L. Zhang, J. Cheng, and Y.-K. Li, Anisotropic magnetoresistivity in semimetal TaSb2, Chinese Physics Letters 34, 127501 (2017)

  17. [17]

    Y. Li, C. An, C. Hua, X. Chen, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhou, R. Zhang, C. Park, Z. Wang, Y. Lu, Y. Zheng, Z. Yang, and Z.-A. Xu, Pressure-induced superconductivity in topological semimetal NbAs2, npj Quantum Materials 3, 58 (2018)

  18. [18]

    Wang, Q.-H

    Y.-Y. Wang, Q.-H. Yu, P.-J. Guo, K. Liu, and T.-L. Xia, Resistivity plateau and extremely large magnetore- sistance in NbAs2 and TaAs2, Phys. Rev. B 94, 041103 (2016)

  19. [19]

    C. Xu, J. Chen, G.-X. Zhi, Y. Li, J. Dai, and C. Cao, Electronic structures of transition metal dipnictides XP n2 (X = Ta , Nb; P n = P , As, Sb), Phys. Rev. B 93, 195106 (2016)

  20. [20]

    S. Chen, Z. Lou, Y. Zhou, Q. Chen, B. Xu, C. Wu, J. Du, J. Yang, H. Wang, and M. Fang, Magnetoresis- tance and kondo effect in nodal-line semimetal vas2, Chi- nese Physics Letters 38, 017202 (2021)

  21. [21]

    GOLIN, B

    M. GOLIN, B. CARLSSON, and S. RUNDQVIST, Re- finement of crystal-structure of VP2, ACTA CHEMICA SCANDINAVICA SERIES A-PHYSICAL AND INOR- GANIC CHEMISTRY 29, 706 (1975), times Cited in Web of Science Core Collection: 12 Total Times Cited: 12 Cited Reference Count: 16

  22. [22]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

  23. [23]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

  24. [24]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

  25. [25]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for ob- taining maximally-localised wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 178, 685 (2008)

  26. [26]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools : An open-source software package for novel topological materials, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018)

  27. [27]

    Z. T, J. Y, S. Z, H. H, H. Y, F. Z, W. H, and F. C, Cata- logue of topological electronic materials, Nature566, 475 (2019)

  28. [28]

    C. D, B. M, and M. NL, Recent advances in tendinopathy, Faculty reviews 9, 10.12703/b/9-16 (2020)

  29. [29]

    Kastner and E

    J. Kastner and E. Wassermann, Kondo effect and impu- rity interactions in the resistivity of diluteznmn alloys, J Low Temp Phys 29, 411 (1977)

  30. [30]

    V. K. C. Liang and C. C. Tsuei, Kondo effect in an amor- phous Ni41Pd41B18 alloy containing cr, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3215 (1973)

  31. [31]

    M. Lee, J. R. Williams, S. Zhang, C. D. Frisbie, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Electrolyte gate-controlled kondo effect in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256601 (2011)

  32. [32]

    T. A. Costi, A. C. Hewson, and V. Zlatic, Transport co- efficients of the anderson model via the numerical renor- malization group, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 6, 2519 (1994)

  33. [33]

    Goldhaber-Gordon, J

    D. Goldhaber-Gordon, J. Göres, M. A. Kastner, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, and U. Meirav, From the kondo regime to the mixed-valence regime in a single- electron transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5225 (1998)

  34. [34]

    Barua, M

    S. Barua, M. C. Hatnean, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakr- ishnan, Signatures of the kondo effect in VSe2, Scientific reports 7, 10964 (2017)

  35. [35]

    J. Ye, X. Gong, Y. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Zhu, Z. Yang, S. Zhou, C. Wu, T. Zhou, L. Liu, J. Du, J. Yang, B. Chen, Y. Li, C. Xu, H. Wang, and M. Fang, Extremely large magnetoresistance and de haas–van alphen effect in the kagome compound Ni3In2Se2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1046, 184934 (2025)

  36. [36]

    X. Peng, Z. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Sun, Y. Su, C. Wu, T. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Li, H. Wang, J. Yang, B. Chen, Y. Li, C. Xi, J. Du, Z. Jiao, Q. Wu, and M. Fang, Universal scaling behavior of transport prop- erties in non-magnetic RuO2, Communications Materials 8 6, 177 (2025)

  37. [37]

    Y. L. Wang, L. R. Thoutam, Z. L. Xiao, J. Hu, S. Das, Z. Q. Mao, J. Wei, R. Divan, A. Luican-Mayer, G. W. Crabtree, and W. K. Kwok, Origin of the turn-on tem- perature behavior in WTe 2, Phys. Rev. B 92, 180402 (2015)

  38. [38]

    J. Xu, F. Han, T.-T. Wang, L. R. Thoutam, S. E. Pate, M. Li, X. Zhang, Y.-L. Wang, R. Fotovat, U. Welp, X. Zhou, W.-K. Kwok, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, and Z.-L. Xiao, Extended kohler’s rule of magnetoresis- tance, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041029 (2021)

  39. [39]

    Y. Zhou, Z. Lou, S. Zhang, H. Chen, Q. Chen, B. Xu, J. Du, J. Yang, H. Wang, C. Xi, L. Pi, Q. Wu, O. V. Yazyev, and M. Fang, Linear and quadratic magnetore- sistance in the semimetal SiP2, Phys. Rev. B102, 115145 (2020)

  40. [40]

    X. Peng, Y. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Sun, Y. Su, C. Wu, T. Zhou, L. Liu, H. Wang, J. Yang, B. Chen, Z. Fang, J. Du, Z. Jiao, Q. Wu, and M. Fang, Scaling behavior of magnetoresistance and hall resistivity in the altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144402 (2025)

  41. [41]

    Lu and S.-Q

    H.-Z. Lu and S.-Q. Shen, Weak localization and weak anti-localization in topological insulators, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2014) p. 91672E

  42. [42]

    Hikami, A

    S. Hikami, A. I. Larkin, and Y. Nagaoka, Spin-orbit in- teraction and magnetoresistance in the two dimensional random system, Progress of Theoretical Physics 63, 707 (1980)

  43. [43]

    Sasmal, R

    S. Sasmal, R. Mondal, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, and B. Singh, Magnetotransport properties of noncentrosym- metric CaAgBi single crystal, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 32, 335701 (2020)

  44. [44]

    D. M. Vu, W. Shon, J.-S. Rhyee, M. Sasaki, A. Ohnishi, K.-S. Kim, and H.-J. Kim, Weak antilocalization and two-carrier electrical transport in Bi1-xSbx single crys- tals (0% ≤ x ≤ 17.0%), Phys. Rev. B100, 125162 (2019)

  45. [45]

    Y. A. Salawu, J. H. Yun, J.-S. Rhyee, M. Sasaki, and H.-J. Kim, Weak antilocalization, spin–orbit interac- tion, and phase coherence length of a dirac semimetal Bi0.97Sb0.03, Scientific Reports 12, 2845 (2022)

  46. [46]

    J. Chen, H. Li, B. Ding, Z. Hou, E. Liu, X. Xi, G. Wu, and W. Wang, Tunable positive magnetoresis- tance and crossover from weak antilocalization to weak localization transition in half-heusler compounds RPtBi (R = lanthanide), Applied Physics Letters 116, 101902 (2020)