pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26552 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 📡 eess.SP

Cooperative OFDM-ISAC Networks: Performance Analysis and Resource Allocation

Shoushuo Zhang , Rang Liu , Qian Liu , Ming Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 10:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords OFDM-ISACcooperative sensingsignal-level fusionparameter-level fusionCramér-Rao boundresource allocationmulti-BS network
0
0 comments X

The pith

In cooperative multi-base-station OFDM-ISAC networks, signal-level fusion of raw echoes provides superior bounds on target position and velocity compared to parameter-level fusion of local estimates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes performance in networks where base stations jointly handle communication and sensing with OFDM waveforms. It compares sending all raw radar echoes to a fusion center against sending only local delay and Doppler estimates with uncertainty details. Derivations show that full signal fusion gives better accuracy for locating and tracking targets, while the parameter approach reaches that accuracy only in limited scenarios with perfect local processing. These bounds then guide the selection of time-frequency resources and power levels to meet communication needs and reduce sensing artifacts.

Core claim

For signal-level fusion, the Cramér-Rao bound is derived for joint estimation of target position and velocity from the collected echoes. For parameter-level fusion, a two-stage metric is developed that first finds the uncertainty in local delay and Doppler estimates at each base station and then propagates those errors geometrically to global position and velocity. Only an oracle maximum-likelihood benchmark for parameter-level fusion can asymptotically reach the signal-level bound, and this occurs only under restrictive conditions.

What carries the argument

The two-stage CRB-like metric that combines local delay/Doppler uncertainty characterization with first-order geometric error propagation to bound global sensing performance.

If this is right

  • The joint resource allocation problem can be solved efficiently using Schur-complement reformulations and penalty-based alternating optimization.
  • Network performance improves in localization and velocity estimation with effective sidelobe suppression on the ambiguity function.
  • Consistent gains are observed over representative baselines in numerical evaluations.
  • Geometry of the base stations influences the performance difference between the two fusion methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Deployments with poor geometry may favor simpler parameter-level fusion to save bandwidth.
  • The approach could be extended to dynamic scenarios where targets move and fusion strategies adapt.
  • Insights on the fusion gap may inform standards for cooperative sensing in future networks.

Load-bearing premise

The first-order geometric error propagation accurately maps local delay and Doppler uncertainties to global position and velocity errors without higher-order effects or mismatches in the multi-base-station geometry.

What would settle it

Compare the actual mean squared error of position and velocity estimates from parameter-level fusion against the derived two-stage metric in a controlled multi-BS setup to see if it approaches the signal-level CRB only under the restrictive conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26552 by Ming Li, Qian Liu, Rang Liu, Shoushuo Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Resource allocation schemes for cooperative sensin view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The considered cooperative OFDM-ISAC system. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The signal processing pipelines. between the two metrics and identify the conditions under which PLF can asymptotically approach the SLF benchmark. A. The Estimation Methodologies and Cramer–Rao Bound ´ Derivation for SLF Under SLF, the fusion center has access to the frequency￾domain sensing observation matrices {Yq} Q q=1 defined in (14). Each Yq ∈ C N×M is collected at the q-th Rx-BS over an OFDM frame … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Position and velocity RMSE (solid) and square-root view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Position and velocity RMSE (solid) and square-root view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of FFT resolution on PLF. 0 5 10 15 Communication sum-rate (bps/Hz) 101 102 CRB Prop. TDB FDB Random 5 10 15 20 25 30 Symbols 10 20 30 40 50 60 Subcarriers 5 10 15 20 25 30 Symbols 10 20 30 40 50 60 Subcarriers 5 10 15 20 25 30 Symbols 10 20 30 40 50 60 Subcarriers (a) CRB performance (b) 0 = 2 bps/Hz (c) 0 = 6 bps/Hz (d) 0 = 14 bps/Hz view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tradeoff between sensing accuracy and communicatio view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatial maps of the position estimation bound under view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cooperative integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) based on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) enables network-wide sensing by exploiting the spatial diversity of multi-base-station (BS). This paper studies performance analysis and time-frequency resource allocation for a multi-BS cooperative OFDM-ISAC network with fine-grained resource-element (RE)-level orthogonal coordination. Two fusion architectures are considered: signal-level fusion (SLF), which forwards raw echoes to a fusion center, and parameter-level fusion (PLF), which reports only local delay/Doppler estimates and their uncertainty information. For SLF, we derive the Cram\'er--Rao bound (CRB) for joint target position and velocity estimation. For PLF, we develop a two-stage CRB-like metric by combining local delay/Doppler uncertainty characterization with first-order geometric error propagation, and show that only an oracle ML-based PLF benchmark can asymptotically attain the SLF CRB under restrictive conditions. Based on these results, we formulate a joint RE-selection and power-allocation problem under network-wide RE exclusivity, per-BS power budgets, a communication sum-rate constraint, and a sidelobe-amplitude constraint on the delay-Doppler ambiguity function. An efficient solution is developed via Schur-complement reformulations and penalty-based alternating optimization. Numerical results validate the analysis, demonstrate effective ambiguity-sidelobe suppression and consistent localization/velocity gains over representative baselines, while revealing geometry-dependent SLF-PLF performance gaps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes cooperative OFDM-ISAC networks with multi-BS coordination at the RE level. It derives the CRB for joint target position and velocity estimation under signal-level fusion (SLF), develops a two-stage CRB-like metric for parameter-level fusion (PLF) that combines local delay/Doppler uncertainty with first-order geometric error propagation, shows that only an oracle ML-based PLF benchmark asymptotically attains the SLF CRB under restrictive conditions, and formulates a joint RE-selection and power-allocation problem subject to exclusivity, power, rate, and ambiguity-function sidelobe constraints. An efficient solver is obtained via Schur-complement reformulations and penalty-based alternating optimization; numerical results illustrate ambiguity suppression and localization/velocity gains over baselines while exposing geometry-dependent SLF-PLF gaps.

Significance. If the derivations and approximation hold, the work supplies useful closed-form performance bounds and a practical resource-allocation framework for cooperative ISAC, clarifying the fundamental trade-off between raw-signal forwarding (SLF) and local-parameter reporting (PLF). The efficient solver and the explicit demonstration of when PLF can approach SLF performance are potentially valuable for system design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / PLF derivation] Abstract and PLF-metric section: the central comparison between SLF CRB and the two-stage PLF metric rests on first-order (Jacobian) linearization of the nonlinear delay/Doppler-to-position/velocity mapping. No remainder-term bounds, validity radius, or dilution-of-precision analysis are indicated; when local estimation errors are finite or the multi-BS geometry is ill-conditioned, the linear approximation can introduce bias or variance inflation that would alter the reported asymptotic gap and the “restrictive conditions” qualifier.
  2. [Resource-allocation section] Optimization formulation (presumably §4): the sidelobe-amplitude constraint on the delay-Doppler ambiguity function is incorporated via Schur-complement reformulation. It is unclear whether the reformulation preserves exact equivalence for the non-convex ambiguity-function constraint or whether additional conservatism is introduced; this directly affects feasibility of the reported resource-allocation solutions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / PLF derivation] Abstract and PLF-metric section: the central comparison between SLF CRB and the two-stage PLF metric rests on first-order (Jacobian) linearization of the nonlinear delay/Doppler-to-position/velocity mapping. No remainder-term bounds, validity radius, or dilution-of-precision analysis are indicated; when local estimation errors are finite or the multi-BS geometry is ill-conditioned, the linear approximation can introduce bias or variance inflation that would alter the reported asymptotic gap and the “restrictive conditions” qualifier.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the limitations of the first-order approximation underlying the PLF metric. The two-stage metric combines local CRB-like uncertainty with a first-order Jacobian-based propagation, which is asymptotically tight as local estimation errors vanish—the precise regime used for the SLF-PLF comparison. We agree that finite errors or ill-conditioned geometries can activate higher-order terms. In the revision we will add a dedicated remark (with a short remainder-term bound under the small-error regime) and numerical quantification of the linearization error over representative geometries and SNR values, thereby strengthening the statement of the restrictive conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Resource-allocation section] Optimization formulation (presumably §4): the sidelobe-amplitude constraint on the delay-Doppler ambiguity function is incorporated via Schur-complement reformulation. It is unclear whether the reformulation preserves exact equivalence for the non-convex ambiguity-function constraint or whether additional conservatism is introduced; this directly affects feasibility of the reported resource-allocation solutions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for requesting clarification on the Schur-complement step. The sidelobe constraint is quadratic in the power variables; the reformulation introduces auxiliary matrix variables so that the constraint becomes a linear matrix inequality inside the alternating optimization. For the specific quadratic form arising from the ambiguity function, the Schur complement yields an equivalent representation when the auxiliary variables are optimized to equality. In the revision we will insert a short equivalence proof and report numerical verification that the returned solutions satisfy the original (non-reformulated) sidelobe constraint to machine precision, confirming that no extra conservatism is introduced beyond the non-convexity already present in the problem. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the SLF CRB directly from the signal model and constructs the PLF two-stage metric from local delay/Doppler characterizations plus first-order propagation; neither reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction nor to a self-citation chain. The subsequent RE-selection/power-allocation problem is posed as a standard constrained optimization solved by Schur-complement reformulation and alternating optimization. No load-bearing step equates its output to its input by construction, and the analysis remains self-contained against the stated model assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the derivations presumably rely on standard far-field assumptions and additive white Gaussian noise models common to the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1303 out tokens · 39853 ms · 2026-05-07T10:49:53.027883+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Toward ISAC-empowered vehicular networks: Framework, advances, and opportunities,

    Z. Du et al., “Toward ISAC-empowered vehicular networks: Framework, advances, and opportunities,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 222-229, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Inte grated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,

    R. Liu, M. Li, H. Luo, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Inte grated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Com- mun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50-57, Feb. 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Clutter-awa re integrated sensing and communication: Models, methods, an d fu- ture directions,

    R. Liu, P . Li, M. Li, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Clutter-awa re integrated sensing and communication: Models, methods, an d fu- ture directions,” Proceedings of the IEEE , early access, DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2026.3675476

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2026.3675476 2026

  4. [4]

    Coop erative ISAC networks: Opportunities and challenges,

    K. Meng, C. Masouros, A. P . Petropulu, and L. Hanzo, “Coop erative ISAC networks: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 212-219, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Cooperative ISAC-empowered low-altitude economy,

    J. Tang, Y . Y u, C. Pun, H. Ren, D. Wang, J. Wang, and X. Y ou, “Cooperative ISAC-empowered low-altitude economy,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 3837-3853, May 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Integrated sensing and communication enabled multiple base stations cooperative sensing towards 6G,

    Z. Wei et al. , “Integrated sensing and communication enabled multiple base stations cooperative sensing towards 6G,” IEEE Network , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 207-215, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Cooperative integrated sensing and communication in 6G: From operators perspective,

    X. Wang et al. , “Cooperative integrated sensing and communication in 6G: From operators perspective,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 52-59, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Multi-node multi-band cooperative integrated sensing a nd communications: State-of-the-art, challenges and opport unities,

    H. Li et al. , “Multi-node multi-band cooperative integrated sensing a nd communications: State-of-the-art, challenges and opport unities,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 180-188, Aug. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Multi-domain optimization framework for ISAC: From elect romagnetic shaping to network cooperation,

    R. Liu, M. Li, M. Zafari, B. Ottersten, and A. L. Swindlehu rst, “Multi-domain optimization framework for ISAC: From elect romagnetic shaping to network cooperation,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , to appear

    work page

  10. [10]

    Transmit beamformi ng opti- mization for cell-free integrated sensing and communicati on systems,

    W. Li, M. Li, M.-M. Zhao, and A. Liu, “Transmit beamformi ng opti- mization for cell-free integrated sensing and communicati on systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , early access

    work page

  11. [11]

    Radiation footprint control in cel l-free coopera- tive ISAC: Optimal joint BS activation and beamforming coor dination,

    J. Chen and X. Wang, “Radiation footprint control in cel l-free coopera- tive ISAC: Optimal joint BS activation and beamforming coor dination,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access

    work page

  12. [12]

    Cooperative cell -free ISAC networks: Joint BS mode selection and beamforming design,

    S. Liu, R. Liu, Z. Lu, M. Li, and Q. Liu, “Cooperative cell -free ISAC networks: Joint BS mode selection and beamforming design,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf., Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Cooperative ISAC for joint localization and velocity estimation in cell-free MIMO sys tems,

    Z. Wang, V . W. S. Wong, and R. Schober, “Cooperative ISAC for joint localization and velocity estimation in cell-free MIMO sys tems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , early access

    work page

  14. [14]

    Coordi nated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,

    X. Y ang, Z. Wei, J. Xu, Y . Fang, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Coordi nated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18019-18035, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Cooperative se nsing- assisted predictive beam tracking for MIMO-OFDM networked ISAC systems,

    X. Y ang, Z. Wei, J. Xu, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Cooperative se nsing- assisted predictive beam tracking for MIMO-OFDM networked ISAC systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10660- 10674, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    MIMO-OFDM signaling d esign for noncoherent distributed ISAC systems,

    K. Han, K. Meng, and C. Masouros, “MIMO-OFDM signaling d esign for noncoherent distributed ISAC systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 25, pp. 7792-7808, 2026

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Limited fe edforward waveform design for OFDM dual-functional radar-communica tions,

    M. F. Keskin, V . Koivunen, and H. Wymeersch, “Limited fe edforward waveform design for OFDM dual-functional radar-communica tions,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 69, pp. 2955-2970, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Constraint-aware power allocation for OFDM-ISAC: A joint PSL-CRB optimization approach,

    M. Iqbal et al. , “Constraint-aware power allocation for OFDM-ISAC: A joint PSL-CRB optimization approach,” in Proc. IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile (APWiMob) , Bali, Indonesia, 2025, pp. 120-125

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Cro ss- domain dual-functional OFDM waveform design for accurate s ens- ing/positioning,

    F. Zhang, T. Mao, R. Liu, Z. Han, S. Chen, and Z. Wang, “Cro ss- domain dual-functional OFDM waveform design for accurate s ens- ing/positioning,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2259- 2274, Sept. 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Sens ing-oriented adaptive resource allocation designs for OFDM-ISAC system s,

    P . Li, M. Li, R. Liu, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Sens ing-oriented adaptive resource allocation designs for OFDM-ISAC system s,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 73, pp. 5121-5135, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Spar se OFDM design for interference and ambiguity mitigation in multis tatic ISAC,

    N. Amani, P . Maity, M. F. Keskin, and H. Wymeersch, “Spar se OFDM design for interference and ambiguity mitigation in multis tatic ISAC,” Dec. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2 512.14357

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Det ection in passive MIMO radar networks,

    D. E. Hack, L. K. Patton, B. Himed, and M. A. Saville, “Det ection in passive MIMO radar networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2999-3012, Jun. 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Cooperativ e maximum likelihood target position estimation for MIMO-ISAC netwo rks,

    L. Pucci, T. Bacchielli, and A. Giorgetti, “Cooperativ e maximum likelihood target position estimation for MIMO-ISAC netwo rks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1531-1535, May 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Device-free sensin g in OFDM cellular network,

    Q. Shi, L. Liu, S. Zhang, and S. Cui, “Device-free sensin g in OFDM cellular network,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1838- 1853, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Main-lobe bea mwidth constrained target localization using bistatic range meas urements,

    Z. Mao, H. Su, L. Shen, X. Jing, and C. Jia, “Main-lobe bea mwidth constrained target localization using bistatic range meas urements,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 72, pp. 289-304, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Symbol-level integrated sensing and communication enabled multiple base stations cooperative sensing,

    Z. Wei et al ., “Symbol-level integrated sensing and communication enabled multiple base stations cooperative sensing,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 724-738, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Device-free localiza tion in ISAC networks: Performance limits and Fisher information-base d cooperative localization,

    Z.-J. Wang, A. Tang, and X. Wang, “Device-free localiza tion in ISAC networks: Performance limits and Fisher information-base d cooperative localization,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , early access

    work page

  28. [28]

    Position error bound for coo perative sensing in MIMO-OFDM networks,

    L. Pucci and A. Giorgetti, “Position error bound for coo perative sensing in MIMO-OFDM networks,” in Proc. IEEE W ork. Signal Proc. Adv. Wireless Comm. (SPAWC), Lucca, Italy, Sep. 2024, pp. 296-300

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimatio n Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1993

    work page 1993

  30. [30]

    Zhang, The Schur Complement and Its Applications , vol

    F. Zhang, The Schur Complement and Its Applications , vol. 4. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2006

    work page 2006