pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26924 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 📡 eess.SP

High Coupling Tunable Acoustic Resonators in Monolithic Barium Titanate

Ian Anderson , Agham Posadas , Alexander A. Demkov , Ruochen Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 10:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords barium titanateacoustic resonatorstunable filterselectromechanical couplingferroelectric domainsLamb modesRF devices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Epitaxial barium titanate on silicon supports laterally excited acoustic resonators with 25.1% electromechanical coupling and 5.6% frequency tuning under bias.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that thin epitaxial barium titanate films on silicon can be released into membranes and patterned with electrodes to create tunable acoustic resonators. Applying a DC bias aligns the ferroelectric domains inside the material, which activates strong electromechanical coupling, shifts the resonance frequency, and improves the quality factor of the excited Lamb modes. This matters for wireless systems because it offers one compact component that can be electrically adjusted across multiple frequency bands instead of using many fixed filters. If the measured performance holds, the approach reduces the part count in reconfigurable radio front ends. Voltage-dependent changes in the material's stiffness and piezoelectric response are extracted to account for the tuning behavior.

Core claim

Lateral excitation of symmetric Lamb (S0) modes in 120 nm X-cut barium titanate membranes on silicon, achieved with a multi-cell electrode layout, produces resonances near 700 MHz that reach a Bode quality factor of 175, electromechanical coupling up to 25.1%, and series and parallel resonance tunability of 2.3% and 5.6% when a DC bias aligns the ferroelectric domains.

What carries the argument

Multi-cell electrode architecture fabricated on released barium titanate membranes that enables lateral excitation of acoustic modes at usable impedance levels while DC bias aligns domains to activate and tune the piezoelectric response.

If this is right

  • Reconfigurable RF front ends with fewer fixed filters become possible using the same material platform.
  • Extracted voltage-dependent permittivity, stiffness, and piezoelectric coefficients allow predictive modeling of tuning behavior.
  • Quality-factor improvement occurs together with frequency tuning under bias.
  • Monolithic integration on silicon supports standard fabrication flows for wireless components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same domain-alignment tuning could be tested in other ferroelectric thin films to widen the range of available acoustic materials.
  • Direct integration with silicon electronics would allow compact, bias-controlled filter banks on a single chip.
  • Varying membrane thickness or electrode spacing offers a route to shift the operating frequency or increase the tuning range while keeping the same domain-alignment mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

Applying a DC bias stably and uniformly aligns ferroelectric domains in the membrane so that this alignment directly enables electrical excitation of the acoustic modes, produces the observed frequency shifts, and improves quality factor without introducing dominant extra losses.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the resonance frequency, coupling coefficient, and quality factor show no change or degrade when DC bias is applied to the device.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26924 by Agham Posadas, Alexander A. Demkov, Ian Anderson, Ruochen Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Optical image of device with 15 cells, with pictorial zoom in on view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of electrode design, highlighting how we view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Zoomed-in admittance measurement at V view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: To counter this, the resonator body is divided into view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Resonance frequency variation with applied bias and (b) antires view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Power handling measurements showing admittance near resonance view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Admittance response over temperature with inset series resonance view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Schematic of modulated and unmodulated regions under bias, (b) view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Wideband and (b) Narrowband COMSOL simulation fit to view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Split-electrode overmoded resonator: (a) schematic of split-electrode view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Acoustic delay line measurements: (a) device image, (b) time-gated view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The growing number of wireless communication bands has driven demand for compact, low-loss, and frequency adjustable RF filtering. Tunable acoustic resonators are well suited to address these needs, offering a path toward reconfigurable front ends with reduced component count. In this work, we extend upon previous conference results to investigate epitaxial barium titanate (BTO) grown on silicon as a platform for tunable acoustic resonators. We demonstrate lateral excitation of symmetric Lamb (S0) modes in 120 nm X-cut BTO membranes using a multi-cell electrode architecture that simultaneously achieves high electromechanical coupling and practical impedance levels. Devices are fabricated with laterally patterned electrodes on released BTO membranes. Under applied DC bias, ferroelectric domains align, allowing electrical excitation, frequency tuning, and quality-factor enhancement of acoustic modes. The primary resonance near 700 MHz exhibits a Bode quality factor of 175, electromechanical coupling up to 25.1%, and series and parallel resonance tunability of 2.3% and 5.6%, respectively. Voltage-dependent material parameters, including permittivity, stiffness, and piezoelectric coefficients, are extracted through a combination of modified Butterworth-Van Dyke modeling and finite-element simulation to explain the observed trends. These results highlight monolithic BTO on silicon as a promising material system for laterally excited, tunable acoustic resonators for reconfigurable RF applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports fabrication and characterization of laterally excited symmetric Lamb (S0) mode resonators in 120 nm X-cut epitaxial barium titanate (BTO) membranes on silicon. Using a multi-cell electrode architecture on released membranes, the authors demonstrate a primary resonance near 700 MHz with Bode quality factor of 175, electromechanical coupling up to 25.1%, and DC-bias tunability of 2.3% (series) and 5.6% (parallel). They attribute the bias-dependent excitation, tuning, and Q enhancement to alignment of ferroelectric domains, and extract voltage-dependent permittivity, stiffness, and piezoelectric coefficients via modified Butterworth-Van Dyke equivalent-circuit fitting combined with finite-element simulations.

Significance. If the central metrics and their physical attribution hold after additional verification, the work would establish monolithic BTO on Si as a viable platform for high-coupling, voltage-tunable acoustic resonators suitable for reconfigurable RF filters. The reported coupling and tunability values are competitive with existing technologies, and the dual use of circuit modeling plus FEM to interpret bias dependence adds interpretive depth. The extension from prior conference results and the silicon-compatible process are practical strengths.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and results] Abstract and results section: The headline metrics (Q_Bode = 175, k^2 up to 25.1%, tunabilities 2.3%/5.6%) are stated without error bars, raw admittance spectra, number of devices measured, or exclusion criteria. This directly affects confidence in the central performance claims and prevents independent assessment of reproducibility.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion of bias dependence: The interpretation that DC bias produces stable, uniform ferroelectric domain alignment enabling excitation, tuning, and Q enhancement is load-bearing for the physical narrative, yet no direct verification (PFM, in-situ XRD, or P-E loop correlation) is provided. Alternative mechanisms such as electrostriction or pure dielectric tuning are not quantitatively excluded, weakening the claim that domain alignment is the operative process.
  3. [Modeling] Modeling section: Voltage-dependent material parameters (piezoelectric coefficients, stiffness, permittivity) are extracted by fitting the modified Butterworth-Van Dyke model and FEM to the same measured spectra they are then invoked to explain. This circularity should be mitigated by independent cross-validation (e.g., separate dielectric or mechanical measurements) before the extracted trends can be treated as explanatory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of results, moderate the physical interpretation of bias effects, and clarify the modeling approach. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results] Abstract and results section: The headline metrics (Q_Bode = 175, k^2 up to 25.1%, tunabilities 2.3%/5.6%) are stated without error bars, raw admittance spectra, number of devices measured, or exclusion criteria. This directly affects confidence in the central performance claims and prevents independent assessment of reproducibility.

    Authors: We agree that additional statistical context and raw data improve confidence. The revised manuscript now reports error bars derived from five devices, states the total number of devices characterized, and specifies that values are taken from devices without obvious fabrication defects. Representative raw admittance spectra have been added to the supplementary information. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of bias dependence: The interpretation that DC bias produces stable, uniform ferroelectric domain alignment enabling excitation, tuning, and Q enhancement is load-bearing for the physical narrative, yet no direct verification (PFM, in-situ XRD, or P-E loop correlation) is provided. Alternative mechanisms such as electrostriction or pure dielectric tuning are not quantitatively excluded, weakening the claim that domain alignment is the operative process.

    Authors: We accept that direct domain imaging (PFM or in-situ XRD) was not performed on the released devices. The revised discussion now presents domain alignment as the most consistent explanation for the simultaneous changes in coupling, frequency, and Q, while explicitly comparing it to electrostriction and dielectric tuning. Using the extracted parameters, we show that the latter two mechanisms alone underpredict the observed coupling increase, thereby supporting the domain-alignment narrative without claiming direct microscopic confirmation. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Modeling] Modeling section: Voltage-dependent material parameters (piezoelectric coefficients, stiffness, permittivity) are extracted by fitting the modified Butterworth-Van Dyke model and FEM to the same measured spectra they are then invoked to explain. This circularity should be mitigated by independent cross-validation (e.g., separate dielectric or mechanical measurements) before the extracted trends can be treated as explanatory.

    Authors: We acknowledge the circularity concern. The revised text clarifies that FEM simulations began with literature values for X-cut BTO and that fitting was used only to extract bias-induced deltas. Independent C-V measurements on unreleased films have been added to corroborate the permittivity trend. A sensitivity analysis for stiffness and piezoelectric coefficients is now included in the supplement to demonstrate that the reported trends remain robust even when starting parameters are varied within literature ranges. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; core claims are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper reports measured resonator metrics (Q_Bode=175, k^2 up to 25.1%, tunability percentages) from fabricated devices under DC bias. Voltage-dependent parameters are extracted via standard modified BVD fitting plus FEM to interpret trends, but this is post-hoc analysis of the same data rather than a derivation chain where a claimed prediction or first-principles result reduces to the inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing justifications for the central results. The domain-alignment explanation is an interpretive assumption, not a mathematical reduction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as an experimental report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental device performance plus post-measurement parameter extraction; no new physical entities are introduced, but several modeling assumptions and fitted coefficients are required to interpret the voltage dependence.

free parameters (2)
  • voltage-dependent piezoelectric coefficients
    Extracted via modified Butterworth-Van Dyke modeling and finite-element simulation to match observed resonance shifts and coupling changes.
  • voltage-dependent stiffness and permittivity
    Fitted to explain trends in resonance frequency and quality factor under DC bias.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ferroelectric domains align uniformly under applied DC bias to enable lateral excitation of S0 modes
    Invoked to account for the onset of electromechanical coupling and tunability when bias is applied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5543 in / 1435 out tokens · 53437 ms · 2026-05-07T10:22:03.547732+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references

  1. [1]

    5G Mobile: Spectrum Broadening to Higher-Frequency Bands to Support High Data Rates,

    Y . Wang, J. Li, L. Huang, Y . Jing, A. Georgakopoulos, and P. Demes- tichas, “5G Mobile: Spectrum Broadening to Higher-Frequency Bands to Support High Data Rates,”IEEE V ehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 39–46, Sep. 2014

    2014

  2. [2]

    Microwave Acoustic Devices: Recent Advances and Outlook,

    S. Gong, R. Lu, Y . Yang, L. Gao, and A. E. Hassanien, “Microwave Acoustic Devices: Recent Advances and Outlook,”IEEE Journal of Microwaves, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 601–609, Apr. 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Microwave Acoustic Wave Devices: Recent Advances on Architectures, Modeling, Materials, and Packaging,

    A. Hagelauer, G. Fattinger, C. C. W. Ruppel, M. Ueda, K.-y. Hashimoto, and A. Tag, “Microwave Acoustic Wave Devices: Recent Advances on Architectures, Modeling, Materials, and Packaging,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4548–4562, Oct. 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    50 GHz Piezoelectric Acoustic Filter,

    O. Barrera, J. Kramer, L. Matto, V . Chulukhadze, S. Cho, M. E. Liao, M. S. Goorsky, and R. Lu, “50 GHz Piezoelectric Acoustic Filter,”IEEE Journal of Microwaves, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 391–400, Mar. 2026

    2026

  5. [5]

    A Solidly Mounted 55 GHz Overmoded Bulk Acoustic Resonator,

    Z. Schaffer, A. Hassanien, M. A. Masud, and G. Piazza, “A Solidly Mounted 55 GHz Overmoded Bulk Acoustic Resonator,” in2023 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, Sep. 2023, pp. 1–4

    2023

  6. [6]

    Recent advances in high-performance millimeter-Wave acoustic resonators and filters using thin-film lithium niobate,

    R. Lu, “Recent advances in high-performance millimeter-Wave acoustic resonators and filters using thin-film lithium niobate,”Progress in Quantum Electronics, vol. 100-101, p. 100565, Mar. 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Acoustic resonators above 100 GHz,

    J. Kramer, B. T. Bosworth, L. Matto, N. R. Jungwirth, O. Barrera, F. Bergmann, S. Cho, V . Chulukhadze, M. Goorsky, N. D. Orloff, and R. Lu, “Acoustic resonators above 100 GHz,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 127, no. 1, p. 012204, Jul. 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Q&A with Qorvo’s Gernot Fattinger: Why RF Filter Innovation is Non-Negotiable,

    G. Fattinger, “Q&A with Qorvo’s Gernot Fattinger: Why RF Filter Innovation is Non-Negotiable,” Oct. 2025

    2025

  9. [9]

    Frequency tunable magnetostatic wave filters with zero static power magnetic biasing circuitry,

    X. Du, M. H. Idjadi, Y . Ding, T. Zhang, A. J. Geers, S. Yao, J. B. Pyo, F. Aflatouni, M. Allen, and R. H. Olsson, “Frequency tunable magnetostatic wave filters with zero static power magnetic biasing circuitry,”Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3582, Apr. 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Spin-wave band-pass filters for 6G communication,

    C. Devitt, S. Tiwari, B. Zivasatienraj, and S. A. Bhave, “Spin-wave band-pass filters for 6G communication,”Nature, Feb. 2026

    2026

  11. [11]

    High-QHigh Power Tunable Filters Manufactured With Injection Molding Technology,

    M. D. Sinanis, P. Adhikari, T. R. Jones, M. Abdelfattah, and D. Peroulis, “High-QHigh Power Tunable Filters Manufactured With Injection Molding Technology,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 19 643–19 653, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    High-Power Tunable FDD Front-End Employing a Balanced CMOS N-Path Receiver and Evanescent-Mode Cavity Filters,

    N. Ginzberg, T. R. Jones, A. Lax, E. Zolkov, M. D. Sinanis, D. Peroulis, and E. Cohen, “High-Power Tunable FDD Front-End Employing a Balanced CMOS N-Path Receiver and Evanescent-Mode Cavity Filters,” in2023 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2023. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, Jun. 2023, pp. 944–947

    2023

  13. [13]

    High-Q 4–6-GHz Suspended Stripline RF MEMS Tunable Filter With Bandwidth Control,

    C.-C. Cheng and G. M. Rebeiz, “High-Q 4–6-GHz Suspended Stripline RF MEMS Tunable Filter With Bandwidth Control,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2469–2476, Oct. 2011

    2011

  14. [14]

    High-Performance 1.5–2.5-GHz RF-MEMS Tunable Filters for Wireless Applications,

    M. A. El-Tanani and G. M. Rebeiz, “High-Performance 1.5–2.5-GHz RF-MEMS Tunable Filters for Wireless Applications,”IEEE Transac- tions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1629– 1637, Jun. 2010

    2010

  15. [15]

    Aluminum scandium nitride thin-film bulk acoustic resonators for 5G wideband applications,

    Y . Zou, C. Gao, J. Zhou, Y . Liu, Q. Xu, Y . Qu, W. Liu, J. B. W. Soon, Y . Cai, and C. Sun, “Aluminum scandium nitride thin-film bulk acoustic resonators for 5G wideband applications,”Microsystems & Nanoengineering, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 124, Nov. 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    FBAR Resonators Fabricated on Insulating Substrates with Improved RF and Nonlinear Performance,

    S. Fouladi, J. Wu, Q. Zou, A. Barfknecht, A. Vats, M. Nasresfahani, S. Martin, and D. A. Feld, “FBAR Resonators Fabricated on Insulating Substrates with Improved RF and Nonlinear Performance,” in2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Glasgow, United Kingdom: IEEE, Oct. 2019, pp. 88–92

    2019

  17. [17]

    Low-Field Ferroelectricity in 10 nm AlBScN Thin Films,

    X. Tong, P. Yousefian, Z. Wang, M. A. Saravanan, R. K. Rai, G. Esteves, E. A. Stach, and R. H. Olsson, “Low-Field Ferroelectricity in 10 nm AlBScN Thin Films,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, pp. 1–1, 2026

    2026

  18. [18]

    Toward Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobate Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators,

    Y . Yang, R. Lu, T. Manzaneque, and S. Gong, “Toward Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobate Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators,” in2018 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (IFCS). Olympic Valley, CA: IEEE, May 2018, pp. 1–5

    2018

  19. [19]

    Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based High Electromechanical Coupling RF-MEMS Resonators for Wideband Filtering,

    S. Gong and G. Piazza, “Design and Analysis of Lithium–Niobate-Based High Electromechanical Coupling RF-MEMS Resonators for Wideband Filtering,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 403–414, Jan. 2013

    2013

  20. [20]

    In- trinsically Switchable Ferroelectric Scandium Aluminum Nitride Lamb- Mode Resonators,

    S. Rassay, D. Mo, C. Li, N. Choudhary, C. Forgey, and R. Tabrizian, “In- trinsically Switchable Ferroelectric Scandium Aluminum Nitride Lamb- Mode Resonators,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1065–1068, Jul. 2021

    2021

  21. [21]

    A Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on Ferroelectric Aluminum Scandium Nitride Films,

    J. Wang, M. Park, S. Mertin, T. Pensala, F. Ayazi, and A. Ansari, “A Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on Ferroelectric Aluminum Scandium Nitride Films,”Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 741–747, Oct. 2020

    2020

  22. [22]

    Intrinsi- cally Switchable GHz Ferroelectric ScAlN SAW Resonators,

    V . Gund, K. Nomoto, H. G. Xing, D. Jena, and A. Lal, “Intrinsi- cally Switchable GHz Ferroelectric ScAlN SAW Resonators,” in2022 IEEE International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics (ISAF). Tours, France: IEEE, Jun. 2022, pp. 1–4

    2022

  23. [23]

    Characterization of ferroelectric switching in 43 nm Y-36 lithium niobate films,

    L. Hurtado and G. Piazza, “Characterization of ferroelectric switching in 43 nm Y-36 lithium niobate films,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 127, no. 8, p. 082904, Aug. 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    18 GHz Y36 Lithium Niobate Ferroelectric Tunable Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator,

    J. Baek, L. Hurtado, J. Duncan, and G. Piazza, “18 GHz Y36 Lithium Niobate Ferroelectric Tunable Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator,” in2025 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Utrecht, Nether- lands: IEEE, Sep. 2025, pp. 1–4

    2025

  25. [25]

    A 9.4 GHz Intrinsically Switchable Lamb- Wave Resonator using Atomic-Layer-Deposited Ferroelectric Hafnia- Zirconia,

    T. Tharpe and R. Tabrizian, “A 9.4 GHz Intrinsically Switchable Lamb- Wave Resonator using Atomic-Layer-Deposited Ferroelectric Hafnia- Zirconia,” in2022 Solid-State, Actuators, and Microsystems Workshop Technical Digest. Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA: Transducer Research Foundation, Jun. 2022, pp. 336–339

    2022

  26. [26]

    An Instinctually Adaptive Lamb-Wave Filter Using Nonlinear Hafnia-Zirconia Ferroelectric Transducer,

    T. Tharpe and R. Tabrizian, “An Instinctually Adaptive Lamb-Wave Filter Using Nonlinear Hafnia-Zirconia Ferroelectric Transducer,” in 2024 IEEE 37th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Austin, TX, USA: IEEE, Jan. 2024, pp. 136–139. 10

    2024

  27. [27]

    Switchable Mechanical Resonance Induced by Hysteretic Piezoelectricity in Ferroelectric Ca- pacitors,

    Y . He, B. Bahr, M. Si, P. Ye, and D. Weinstein, “Switchable Mechanical Resonance Induced by Hysteretic Piezoelectricity in Ferroelectric Ca- pacitors,” in2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII). Berlin, Germany: IEEE, Jun. 2019, pp. 717– 720

    2019

  28. [28]

    Reconfigurable Radios Em- ploying Ferroelectrics: Recent Progress on Reconfigurable RF Acoustic Devices Based on Thin-Film Ferroelectric Barium Strontium Titanate,

    M. Zolfagharloo Koohi and A. Mortazawi, “Reconfigurable Radios Em- ploying Ferroelectrics: Recent Progress on Reconfigurable RF Acoustic Devices Based on Thin-Film Ferroelectric Barium Strontium Titanate,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 120–135, May 2020

    2020

  29. [29]

    Compact Intrin- sically Switchable FBAR Filters Utilizing Ferroelectric BST,

    M. Zolfagharloo Koohi, S. Lee, and A. Mortazawi, “Compact Intrin- sically Switchable FBAR Filters Utilizing Ferroelectric BST,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1468–1474, Aug. 2018

    2018

  30. [30]

    High Q m×kt2 intrinsically switchable BST thin film bulk acoustic resonators,

    M. Z. Koohi, S. Lee, and A. Mortazawi, “High Q m×kt2 intrinsically switchable BST thin film bulk acoustic resonators,” in2017 IEEE MTT- S International Microwave Symposium (IMS). Honololu, HI, USA: IEEE, Jun. 2017, pp. 296–299

    2017

  31. [31]

    A Switchless Quad Band Filter Bank Based on Ferroelectric BST FBARs,

    S. Nam, M. Z. Koohi, W. Peng, and A. Mortazawi, “A Switchless Quad Band Filter Bank Based on Ferroelectric BST FBARs,”IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 662–665, Jun. 2021

    2021

  32. [32]

    Tunable Solidly Mounted Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators Based on Ba x Sr1-x TiO3 Films,

    J. Berge, A. V orobiev, W. Steichen, and S. Gevorgian, “Tunable Solidly Mounted Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators Based on Ba x Sr1-x TiO3 Films,”IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 655–657, Sep. 2007

    2007

  33. [33]

    Nature of electro-optic response in tetragonal BaTiO 3,

    I. Kim, T. Paoletta, and A. A. Demkov, “Nature of electro-optic response in tetragonal BaTiO 3,”Physical Review B, vol. 108, no. 11, p. 115201, Sep. 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    Crystal domain orientation control of epitaxial BaTiO 3 films integrated on silicon for large electro-optic response,

    H. Kim, S. Mathews, J. Tischler, A. B. Posadas, A. A. Demkov, and A. Piqu´e, “Crystal domain orientation control of epitaxial BaTiO 3 films integrated on silicon for large electro-optic response,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 127, no. 5, p. 051102, Aug. 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Thick BaTiO 3 Epitaxial Films Integrated on Si by RF Sputtering for Electro-Optic Modulators in Si Photonics,

    A. B. Posadas, H. Park, M. Reynaud, W. Cao, J. D. Reynolds, W. Guo, V . Jeyaselvan, I. Beskin, G. Z. Mashanovich, J. H. Warner, and A. A. Demkov, “Thick BaTiO 3 Epitaxial Films Integrated on Si by RF Sputtering for Electro-Optic Modulators in Si Photonics,”ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 13, no. 43, pp. 51 230–51 244, Nov. 2021

    2021

  36. [36]

    Thermo-Optic Control of Barium Titanate Modulators on Silicon-on-Insulator Substrates,

    H. G. Kim, A. Raju, L. Tian, D. Krueger, A. Posadas, A. A. Demkov, and D. Wasserman, “Thermo-Optic Control of Barium Titanate Modulators on Silicon-on-Insulator Substrates,”IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 819–822, Jun. 2026

    2026

  37. [37]

    High-Q Monolithic Ring Resonators in Low-Loss Barium Titanate on Silicon,

    A. Raju, D. Hungund, D. Krueger, Z. Dong, Z. Sakotic, A. B. Posadas, A. A. Demkov, and D. Wasserman, “High-Q Monolithic Ring Resonators in Low-Loss Barium Titanate on Silicon,”Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 19, no. 16, p. 2402086, Aug. 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Tunable Ferro- electric Acoustic Resonators in Monolithic Thin-Film Barium Titanate,

    I. Anderson, A. Posadas, A. A. Demkov, and R. Lu, “Tunable Ferro- electric Acoustic Resonators in Monolithic Thin-Film Barium Titanate,” 2026, version Number: 1

    2026

  39. [39]

    Analysis of Interdigital Surface Wave Transducers by Use of an Equivalent Circuit Model,

    W. Smith, H. Gerard, J. Collins, T. Reeder, and H. Shaw, “Analysis of Interdigital Surface Wave Transducers by Use of an Equivalent Circuit Model,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 856–864, Nov. 1969

    1969

  40. [40]

    Dynamics of lattice disorder in perovskite materials, polarization nanoclusters and ferroelectric domain wall structures,

    J. O ˇcen´aˇsek, J. Min ´ar, and J. Alcal ´a, “Dynamics of lattice disorder in perovskite materials, polarization nanoclusters and ferroelectric domain wall structures,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 118, Jul. 2023

    2023

  41. [41]

    After 60 years: A new formula for computing quality factor is warranted,

    D. A. Feld, R. Parker, R. Ruby, P. Bradley, and S. Dong, “After 60 years: A new formula for computing quality factor is warranted,” in 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Beijing, China: IEEE, Nov. 2008, pp. 431–436

    2008

  42. [42]

    J. F. Rosenbaum,Bulk acoustic wave theory and devices, ser. The Artech House acoustics library. Boston: Artech House, 1988

    1988

  43. [43]

    Field and temperature dependent parameters of the dc field induced resonances in BaxSr1-xTiO3-based tunable thin film bulk acoustic resonators,

    J. Berge, M. Norling, A. V orobiev, and S. Gevorgian, “Field and temperature dependent parameters of the dc field induced resonances in BaxSr1-xTiO3-based tunable thin film bulk acoustic resonators,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 6, p. 064508, Mar. 2008

    2008

  44. [44]

    BST thin film bulk acoustic resonator optimization for un-cooled IR sensors application,

    M. Z. Koohi and A. Mortazawi, “BST thin film bulk acoustic resonator optimization for un-cooled IR sensors application,” in2017 47th Euro- pean Microwave Conference (EuMC). Nuremberg: IEEE, Oct. 2017, pp. 328–330

    2017

  45. [45]

    Heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermal expansion of barium titanate-based ceramics,

    Y . He, “Heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermal expansion of barium titanate-based ceramics,”Thermochimica Acta, vol. 419, no. 1-2, pp. 135–141, Sep. 2004

    2004

  46. [46]

    Modeling tunable bulk acoustic resonators based on induced piezoelectric effect in BaTiO3 and Ba0.25Sr0.75TiO3 films,

    I. B. Vendik, P. A. Turalchuk, O. G. Vendik, and J. Berge, “Modeling tunable bulk acoustic resonators based on induced piezoelectric effect in BaTiO3 and Ba0.25Sr0.75TiO3 films,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 1, p. 014107, Jan. 2008

    2008

  47. [47]

    Piezoelectric thin films for bulk acoustic wave resonator applications : from processing to microwave filters,

    R. Lanz, “Piezoelectric thin films for bulk acoustic wave resonator applications : from processing to microwave filters,” Ph.D. dissertation, Lausanne, EPFL, 2004

    2004

  48. [48]

    Solidly Mounted Scandium Aluminum Nitride on Acoustic Bragg Reflector Platforms at 14–20 GHz,

    I. Anderson, O. Barrera, N. Ravi, L. Matto, K. Saha, S. Dasgupta, J. Campbell, J. Kramer, E. Kwon, T.-H. Hsu, S. Cho, P. Simeoni, J. Hou, M. Rinaldi, M. S. Goorsky, and R. Lu, “Solidly Mounted Scandium Aluminum Nitride on Acoustic Bragg Reflector Platforms at 14–20 GHz,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 72, no. ...

    2025

  49. [49]

    Low Propagation Loss Acoustic Delay Lines based on YX- LiNbO 3 /SiO 2 /Sapphire,

    C.-H. Tsai, T.-H. Hsu, Z.-Q. Lee, C.-C. Lin, Y .-C. Yu, S.-S. Tung, and M.-H. Li, “Low Propagation Loss Acoustic Delay Lines based on YX- LiNbO 3 /SiO 2 /Sapphire,” in2023 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, Sep. 2023, pp. 1–4

    2023

  50. [50]

    A 5.9 GHz Sezawa SAW Acoustic Delay Line Based on Al 0.6 Sc0.4N- on-Sapphire with PropagationQ-factor of 3,044,

    C.-Y . Chang, X. Tong, P. Yousefian, E. Klein, X. Du, and R. H. Olsson, “A 5.9 GHz Sezawa SAW Acoustic Delay Line Based on Al 0.6 Sc0.4N- on-Sapphire with PropagationQ-factor of 3,044,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  51. [51]

    Intrinsically Switchable Ferroelectric Contour Mode Resonators,

    V . Lee, S. A. Sis, J. D. Phillips, and A. Mortazawi, “Intrinsically Switchable Ferroelectric Contour Mode Resonators,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2806–2813, Aug. 2013

    2013

  52. [52]

    An Intrinsically Switch- able, Monolithic BAW Filter Using Ferroelectric BST,

    S. A. Sis, S. Lee, V . Lee, and A. Mortazawi, “An Intrinsically Switch- able, Monolithic BAW Filter Using Ferroelectric BST,”IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–27, Jan. 2016

    2016

  53. [53]

    Tunability of Alluminum Nitride Acoustic Resonators: A Phenomeno- logical Approach,

    E. Defa ¨y, N. B. Hassine, P. Emery, G. Parat, J. Abergel, and A. Devos, “Tunability of Alluminum Nitride Acoustic Resonators: A Phenomeno- logical Approach,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 2516–2520, Dec. 2011

    2011