pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.28058 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Multimode grating couplers via foundry-compliant inverse design

Hao Li , Nazar Pyvovar , Zhaowei Dai , Owen D. Miller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 06:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords grating couplersinverse designmultimode couplingfoundry compliantmultilayer structuresphotonic devicesoptimizationetch robustness
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inverse design produces foundry-compliant multilayer grating couplers that couple multiple free-space waves to on-chip modes while preserving simple scaling laws.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic inverse design method for multilayer grating couplers that handle several independent waves from free space to on-chip modes. It identifies minimum feature sizes as the dominant constraint and adds requirements for robustness to over- and under-etch, which turns out to stabilize performance against other fabrication variations like critical dimension changes and overlay errors. The resulting designs show only moderate efficiency losses when feature sizes grow larger, yet the underlying rules for how many layers and what thicknesses are needed remain unchanged. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a concrete route to high-efficiency multimode coupling that fits inside existing semiconductor foundry rules, removing the need for exotic fabrication steps.

Core claim

We apply inverse design to discover foundry-compliant multilayer grating couplers that efficiently couple a number of independent waves from free space to on-chip propagating modes; minimum feature sizes are the most important constraint, and forcing robustness to etch errors produces structures whose efficiencies remain stable against critical dimension variations, overlay mismatch, and sidewall angle variation, with only moderate efficiency penalties as feature sizes increase but no change to the simple scaling laws for numbers of layers and layer thicknesses.

What carries the argument

The inverse design optimization algorithm that enforces minimum feature sizes and robustness to over- and under-etch errors to generate stable multimode grating coupler geometries.

If this is right

  • High-efficiency multimode coupling becomes possible using only standard foundry processes without custom fabrication steps.
  • The number of layers and thicknesses required for target performance follow the same simple scaling relations even when feature sizes are enlarged to meet foundry rules.
  • Stability to etch errors automatically confers stability to other common imperfections such as overlay mismatch and sidewall angle variation.
  • The same constrained optimization framework can be applied to other photonic coupling or routing problems under comparable manufacturing limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same approach could shorten the design cycle for additional foundry-compatible photonic components by reusing the same constraint set.
  • Actual fabrication runs of these designs would reveal the size of any remaining simulation-to-reality gap beyond the modeled imperfections.
  • Extending the method to higher numbers of modes or different wavelength bands would likely preserve the same scaling behavior once feature-size and etch constraints are met.

Load-bearing premise

That simulations of the optimized structures under the enforced minimum feature size and etch-robustness constraints will accurately predict the performance of real fabricated devices when all listed imperfections are present.

What would settle it

Fabricate the reported coupler designs in a foundry process, measure their coupling efficiencies across different layer counts and thicknesses, and check whether the observed scaling matches the simulated laws or deviates significantly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.28058 by Hao Li, Nazar Pyvovar, Owen D. Miller, Zhaowei Dai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Multi-functional grating coupler designs and considered fabrication imperfections. (a) A grating view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Inverse-design workflow for a grating coupler with minimum feature size MFS = 62 nm, optimized over view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Performance tradeoff with minimum feature size for various design configurations. (a) Best achievable view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Robustness testing and optimization of the bilayer grating coupler of Fig. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We apply a systematic inverse design approach to discover foundry-compliant, multilayer grating couplers that can efficiently couple a number of independent waves from free space to on-chip propagating modes. For visible- and near-infrared couplers, we find that minimum feature sizes are by far the most important constraint to tailor the design algorithms around. If, additionally, one forces the optimization to be robust to over- and under-etch errors, the resulting designs exhibit stable optimal efficiencies in the presence of other imperfections (critical dimension variations, overlay mismatch, and sidewall angle variation). The foundry-compliant designs exhibit moderate efficiency penalties as feature sizes increase, but no change to simple underlying scaling laws with respect to requisite numbers of layers and layer thicknesses. These results establish a practical, generalizable framework for high-efficiency multimode coupling within the constraints of modern semiconductor foundries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies inverse design to multilayer grating couplers for coupling multiple independent free-space waves to on-chip modes. Minimum feature size is identified as the dominant constraint; when the optimizer is also forced to be robust to over- and under-etch, the resulting structures maintain stable efficiencies under separate sweeps of critical-dimension variation, overlay mismatch, and sidewall-angle variation. Moderate efficiency penalties appear with larger minimum features, yet the scaling of required layer count and thickness remains unchanged. The work positions these designs as a practical, generalizable framework for foundry-compliant multimode couplers in the visible and near-infrared.

Significance. If the robustness and scaling results hold under realistic fabrication statistics, the paper supplies a concrete, simulation-driven route to high-efficiency multimode grating couplers that can be manufactured in standard semiconductor foundries without custom process development. This would be useful for visible/NIR photonic integrated circuits where multimode free-space interfaces are needed.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (robustness analysis): Stability under critical-dimension, overlay, and sidewall-angle errors is demonstrated exclusively via independent one-at-a-time parameter sweeps inside the electromagnetic solver. Because real foundry variation is statistically correlated (etch depth simultaneously shifts CD, sidewall angle, and overlay), the reported “stable optimal efficiencies” may not survive joint process variation; the optimization never sees the joint error distribution. This directly affects the central claim of a “practical, generalizable framework” for foundry use.
  2. [§5] §5 (scaling-laws section): The statement that “no change to simple underlying scaling laws” occurs with increasing minimum feature size is asserted without an explicit side-by-side derivation or table comparing the unconstrained versus constrained scaling exponents for layer count and thickness. Without that comparison, it is unclear whether the scaling invariance is a genuine result or an artifact of the particular objective and constraints chosen.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase “moderate efficiency penalties” is not quantified; reporting the actual efficiency drop (e.g., from 80 % to 65 %) would make the trade-off concrete for readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (throughout): Several performance plots lack error bars or standard-deviation shading from the Monte-Carlo robustness runs; adding these would clarify the claimed stability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful and constructive feedback. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (robustness analysis): Stability under critical-dimension, overlay, and sidewall-angle errors is demonstrated exclusively via independent one-at-a-time parameter sweeps inside the electromagnetic solver. Because real foundry variation is statistically correlated (etch depth simultaneously shifts CD, sidewall angle, and overlay), the reported “stable optimal efficiencies” may not survive joint process variation; the optimization never sees the joint error distribution. This directly affects the central claim of a “practical, generalizable framework” for foundry use.

    Authors: We agree that independent one-at-a-time sweeps do not capture the correlated nature of real foundry variations, where etch depth simultaneously influences critical dimension, sidewall angle, and overlay. Our optimization already enforces robustness to over- and under-etch, which couples several of these parameters and provides a measure of tolerance to correlated errors. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that a full joint statistical analysis would be more complete. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion in §4.2 to explicitly note this limitation and to include a qualitative assessment using representative correlation coefficients drawn from typical semiconductor process data; the resulting efficiency variation remains moderate and consistent with the individual-sweep results. We have also added a brief recommendation that practical deployment should incorporate foundry-specific Monte Carlo models. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (scaling-laws section): The statement that “no change to simple underlying scaling laws” occurs with increasing minimum feature size is asserted without an explicit side-by-side derivation or table comparing the unconstrained versus constrained scaling exponents for layer count and thickness. Without that comparison, it is unclear whether the scaling invariance is a genuine result or an artifact of the particular objective and constraints chosen.

    Authors: The scaling relations follow directly from the electromagnetic requirements of multimode coupling: the number of layers must increase with the number of independent modes to supply sufficient vertical degrees of freedom, while layer thicknesses are set by the operating wavelength and refractive-index contrast to satisfy phase-matching conditions. The minimum-feature-size constraint affects only lateral resolution and does not alter these vertical scaling laws. To make the comparison explicit, we have added Table 3 in the revised §5 that lists the scaling exponents for layer count (linear in the number of modes) and total thickness (proportional to wavelength) for both the unconstrained and minimum-feature-size-constrained designs; the exponents agree to within numerical precision. A short derivation supporting the table has also been inserted in the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from independent inverse-design optimization and forward simulation

full rationale

The paper's central chain consists of (1) formulating an inverse-design objective with explicit constraints on minimum feature size and etch-depth robustness, (2) running the optimizer to produce candidate structures, and (3) evaluating those structures under separate, independent parameter sweeps for CD variation, overlay, and sidewall angle. None of these steps reduces to a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, a self-definition, or a load-bearing self-citation that supplies the target result. The reported scaling laws with layer count and thickness are presented as observed outcomes of the optimized designs, not imposed by construction. The method is therefore self-contained against external numerical benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard electromagnetic wave propagation and numerical optimization; no new physical entities or ad-hoc postulates are introduced in the abstract. Free parameters are limited to design constraints such as minimum feature size and etch-error bounds, which are chosen rather than fitted to target data.

free parameters (2)
  • minimum feature size
    Hard constraint imposed on the optimizer to match foundry rules; value not numerically specified in abstract.
  • etch error bounds
    Robustness margin added to the optimization objective; exact tolerance values not given in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations accurately describe light propagation in the multilayer grating structures.
    Implicit foundation of all photonic inverse-design simulations.
  • domain assumption The chosen numerical optimizer can locate high-performance designs within the imposed fabrication constraints.
    Required for the inverse-design procedure to succeed; stated as the systematic approach taken.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5444 in / 1518 out tokens · 46388 ms · 2026-05-07T06:34:15.011701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mekis, S

    A. Mekis, S. Gloeckner, G. Masini, A. Narasimha, T. Pinguet, S. Sahni, and P. De Dobbelaere, A grating- coupler-enabled CMOS photonics platform, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics17, 597 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    D. Dai, J. Bauters, and J. E. Bowers, Passive technologies for future large-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon: polarization handling, light non-reciprocity and loss reduction, Light: Science & Applications 1, e1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Marchetti, C

    R. Marchetti, C. Lacava, L. Carroll, K. Gradkowski, and P. Minzioni, Coupling strategies for silicon photonics integrated chips, Photonics Research7, 201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    W. Shi, Y. Tian, and A. Gervais, Scaling capacity of fiber-optic transmission systems via silicon photonics, Nanophotonics9, 4629 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    K. Y. Yang, C. Shirpurkar, A. D. White, J. Zang, L. Chang, F. Ashtiani, M. A. Guidry, D. M. Lukin, S. V. Pericherla, J. Yang,et al., Multi-dimensional data transmission using inverse-designed silicon photonics and microcombs, Nature communications13, 7862 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    C. Sun, M. T. Wade, Y. Lee, J. S. Orcutt, L. Alloatti, M. S. Georgas, A. S. Waterman, J. M. Shainline, R. R. Avizienis, S. Lin,et al., Single-chip microprocessor that communicates directly using light, Nature 528, 534 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    K. K. Mehta, C. D. Bruzewicz, R. McConnell, R. J. Ram, J. M. Sage, and J. Chiaverini, Integrated optical addressing of an ion qubit, Nature nanotechnology11, 1066 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    R. J. Niffenegger, J. Stuart, C. Sorace-Agaskar, D. Kharas, S. Bramhavar, C. D. Bruzewicz, W. Loh, R. T. Maxson, R. McConnell, D. Reens,et al., Integrated multi-wavelength control of an ion qubit, Nature586, 538 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    K. K. Mehta, C. Zhang, M. Malinowski, T.-L. Nguyen, M. Stadler, and J. P. Home, Integrated optical multi-ion quantum logic, Nature586, 533 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    D. J. Blumenthal, A. Isichenko, and N. Chauhan, Enabling photonic integrated 3d magneto-optical traps for quantum sciences and applications, Optica Quantum2, 444 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Tamir and S.-T

    T. Tamir and S.-T. Peng, Analysis and design of grating couplers, Applied physics14, 235 (1977)

    work page 1977

  12. [12]

    Petit, A tutorial introduction, inElectromagnetic Theory of Gratings(Springer, 1980) pp

    R. Petit, A tutorial introduction, inElectromagnetic Theory of Gratings(Springer, 1980) pp. 1–52

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    X. Chen, C. Li, C. K. Fung, S. M. Lo, and H. K. Tsang, Apodized waveguide grating couplers for efficient coupling to optical fibers, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters22, 1156 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Marchetti, C

    R. Marchetti, C. Lacava, A. Khokhar, X. Chen, I. Cristiani, D. J. Richardson, G. T. Reed, P. Petropoulos, and P. Minzioni, High-efficiency grating-couplers: demonstration of a new design strategy, Scientific reports 7, 16670 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Zhao and S

    Z. Zhao and S. Fan, Design principles of apodized grating couplers, Journal of Lightwave Technology38, 4435 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    S. Wang, R. Magnusson, J. S. Bagby, and M. Moharam, Guided-mode resonances in planar dielectric-layer diffraction gratings, Journal of the Optical Society of America A7, 1470 (1990)

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    Rosenblatt, A

    D. Rosenblatt, A. Sharon, and A. A. Friesem, Resonant grating waveguide structures, IEEE Journal of Quantum electronics33, 2038 (1997)

    work page 2038

  18. [18]

    Quaranta, G

    G. Quaranta, G. Basset, O. J. Martin, and B. Gallinet, Recent advances in resonant waveguide gratings, Laser & Photonics Reviews12, 1800017 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Y. Tang, Z. Wang, L. Wosinski, U. Westergren, and S. He, Highly efficient nonuniform grating coupler for silicon-on-insulator nanophotonic circuits, Optics letters35, 1290 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Taillaert, W

    D. Taillaert, W. Bogaerts, P. Bienstman, T. F. Krauss, P. Van Daele, I. Moerman, S. Verstuyft, K. De Mesel, and R. Baets, An out-of-plane grating coupler for efficient butt-coupling between compact planar waveguides and single-mode fibers, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics38, 949 (2002)

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Taillaert, F

    D. Taillaert, F. V. Laere, M. Ayre, W. Bogaerts, D. V. Thourhout, P. Bienstman, and R. Baets, Grating 12 couplers for coupling between optical fibers and nanophotonic waveguides, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics45, 6071 (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Y. Ding, C. Peucheret, H. Ou, and K. Yvind, Fully etched apodized grating coupler on the soi platform with- 0.58 db coupling efficiency, Optics letters39, 5348 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    W. S. Zaoui, A. Kunze, W. Vogel, M. Berroth, J. Butschke, F. Letzkus, and J. Burghartz, Bridging the gap between optical fibers and silicon photonic integrated circuits, Optics express22, 1277 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Roelkens, D

    G. Roelkens, D. Van Thourhout, and R. Baets, High efficiency silicon-on-insulator grating coupler based on a poly-silicon overlay, Optics Express14, 11622 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Vermeulen, S

    D. Vermeulen, S. Selvaraja, P. Verheyen, G. Lepage, W. Bogaerts, P. Absil, D. Van Thourhout, and G. Roelkens, High-efficiency fiber-to-chip grating couplers realized using an advanced cmos-compatible silicon-on-insulator platform, Optics express18, 18278 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    W. D. Sacher, Y. Huang, L. Ding, B. J. Taylor, H. Jayatilleka, G.-Q. Lo, and J. K. Poon, Wide bandwidth and high coupling efficiency si3n4-on-soi dual-level grating coupler, Optics express22, 10938 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    L. Su, R. Trivedi, N. V. Sapra, A. Y. Piggott, D. Vercruysse, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Fully-automated optimiza- tion of grating couplers, Optics express26, 4023 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    N. V. Sapra, D. Vercruysse, L. Su, K. Y. Yang, J. Skarda, A. Y. Piggott, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Inverse design and demonstration of broadband grating couplers, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 25, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    A. M. Hammond, J. B. Slaby, M. J. Probst, and S. E. Ralph, Multi-layer inverse design of vertical grating couplers for high-density, commercial foundry interconnects, Optics Express30, 31058 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Michaels and E

    A. Michaels and E. Yablonovitch, Inverse design of near unity efficiency perfectly vertical grating couplers, Optics express26, 4766 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Van Vaerenbergh, P

    T. Van Vaerenbergh, P. Sun, S. Hooten, M. Jain, Q. Wilmart, A. Seyedi, Z. Huang, M. Fiorentino, and R. Beausoleil, Wafer-level testing of inverse-designed and adjoint-inspired vertical grating coupler designs compatible with duv lithography, Optics Express29, 37021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Van Vaerenbergh, S

    T. Van Vaerenbergh, S. Hooten, M. Jain, P. Sun, Q. Wilmart, A. Seyedi, Z. Huang, M. Fiorentino, and R. Beausoleil, Wafer-level testing of inverse-designed and adjoint-inspired dual layer si-sin vertical grating couplers, Journal of Physics: Photonics4, 044001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Taillaert, H

    D. Taillaert, H. Chong, P. I. Borel, L. H. Frandsen, R. M. De La Rue, and R. Baets, A compact two- dimensional grating coupler used as a polarization splitter, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters15, 1249 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Streshinsky, R

    M. Streshinsky, R. Shi, A. Novack, R. T. P. Cher, A. E.-J. Lim, P. G.-Q. Lo, T. Baehr-Jones, and M. Hochberg, A compact bi-wavelength polarization splitting grating coupler fabricated in a 220 nm soi platform, Optics express21, 31019 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Cheng, Q

    G. Cheng, Q. Yi, Q. Li, Z. Yan, F. Xu, Y. Zou, T. Li, Y. Zou, Y. Yu, and L. Shen, Single-step etched two-dimensional polarization splitting dual-band grating coupler for wavelength (de) multiplexing, Optics Letters47, 3924 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    A. Y. Piggott, J. Lu, T. M. Babinec, K. G. Lagoudakis, J. Petykiewicz, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Inverse design and implementation of a wavelength demultiplexing grating coupler, Scientific reports4, 7210 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Sideris, A

    C. Sideris, A. Khachaturian, A. D. White, O. P. Bruno, and A. Hajimiri, Foundry-fabricated grating coupler demultiplexer inverse-designed via fast integral methods, Communications Physics5, 68 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Su, L.-Y

    H.-T. Su, L.-Y. Wang, C.-Y. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Chang, and Y.-W. Huang, Topology optimization enables high-q metasurface for color selectivity, Nano Letters24, 10055 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    M. P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering71, 197 (1988)

    work page 1988

  40. [40]

    M. P. Bendsoe and O. Sigmund,Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    J. S. Jensen and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization for nano-photonics, Laser & Photonics Reviews5, 308 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    W. Ma, Z. Liu, Z. A. Kudyshev, A. Boltasseva, W. Cai, and Y. Liu, Deep learning for the design of photonic structures, Nature photonics15, 77 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Kuang and O

    Z. Kuang and O. D. Miller, Computational bounds to light–matter interactions via local conservation laws, Physical Review Letters125, 263607 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Gertler, Z

    S. Gertler, Z. Kuang, C. Christie, H. Li, and O. D. Miller, Many photonic design problems are sparse qcqps, Science Advances11, eadl3237 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Bennet, D

    P. Bennet, D. Langevin, C. Essoual, A. Khaireh-Walieh, O. Teytaud, P. Wiecha, and A. Moreau, Illustrated tutorial on global optimization in nanophotonics, Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, A126 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    K. Y. Yang, J. Skarda, M. Cotrufo, A. Dutt, G. H. Ahn, M. Sawaby, D. Vercruysse, A. Arbabian, S. Fan, A. Al` u,et al., Inverse-designed non-reciprocal pulse router for chip-based lidar, Nature Photonics14, 369 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Chung, F

    H. Chung, F. Zhang, H. Li, O. D. Miller, and H. I. Smith, Inverse design of high-na metalens for maskless lithography, Nanophotonics12, 2371 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Pestourie, C

    R. Pestourie, C. P´ erez-Arancibia, Z. Lin, W. Shin, F. Capasso, and S. G. Johnson, Inverse design of 13 large-area metasurfaces, Optics express26, 33732 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Ganapati, O

    V. Ganapati, O. D. Miller, and E. Yablonovitch, Light trapping textures designed by electromagnetic optimization for subwavelength thick solar cells, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics4, 175 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Z. Lin, C. Roques-Carmes, R. Pestourie, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, A. Majumdar, and S. G. Johnson, End-to-end nanophotonic inverse design for imaging and polarimetry, Nanophotonics10, 1177 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Z. Li, R. Pestourie, J.-S. Park, Y.-W. Huang, S. G. Johnson, and F. Capasso, Inverse design enables large- scale high-performance meta-optics reshaping virtual reality, Nature communications13, 2409 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    M. Y. Wang, X. Wang, and D. Guo, A level set method for structural topology optimization, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering192, 227 (2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    N. P. Van Dijk, K. Maute, M. Langelaar, and F. Van Keulen, Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization48, 437 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    C. M. Lalau-Keraly, S. Bhargava, O. D. Miller, and E. Yablonovitch, Adjoint shape optimization applied to electromagnetic design, Optics express21, 21693 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    J. S. Jensen and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization of photonic crystal structures: a high-bandwidth low-loss t-junction waveguide, Journal of the Optical Society of America B22, 1191 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    R. E. Christiansen and O. Sigmund, Inverse design in photonics by topology optimization: tutorial, Journal of the Optical Society of America B38, 496 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    F. Wang, B. S. Lazarov, and O. Sigmund, On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization, Structural and multidisciplinary optimization43, 767 (2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    A. M. Hammond, A. Oskooi, M. Chen, Z. Lin, S. G. Johnson, and S. E. Ralph, High-performance hybrid time/frequency-domain topology optimization for large-scale photonics inverse design, Optics Express30, 4467 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    B. S. Lazarov, F. Wang, and O. Sigmund, Length scale and manufacturability in density-based topology optimization, Archive of Applied Mechanics86, 189 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    M. Chen, R. E. Christiansen, J. A. Fan, G. I¸ siklar, J. Jiang, S. G. Johnson, W. Ma, O. D. Miller, A. Oskooi, M. F. Schubert,et al., Validation and characterization of algorithms and software for photonics inverse design, Journal of the Optical Society of America B41, A161 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    A. M. Hammond, A. Oskooi, S. G. Johnson, and S. E. Ralph, Photonic topology optimization with semiconductor-foundry design-rule constraints, Optics Express29, 23916 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    A. M. Hammond, A. Oskooi, I. M. Hammond, M. Chen, S. E. Ralph, and S. G. Johnson, Unifying and accelerating level-set and density-based topology optimization by subpixel-smoothed projection, Optics Express33, 33620 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    M. Zhou, B. S. Lazarov, F. Wang, and O. Sigmund, Minimum length scale in topology optimization by geometric constraints, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering293, 266 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Qian and O

    X. Qian and O. Sigmund, Topological design of electromechanical actuators with robustness toward over- and under-etching, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering253, 237 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    Arrieta, G

    R. Arrieta, G. Romano, and S. G. Johnson, Hyperparameter-free minimum-lengthscale constraints for topology optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16108 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Wein and M

    F. Wein and M. Stingl, A combined parametric shape optimization and ersatz material approach, Struc- tural and Multidisciplinary Optimization57, 1297 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    R. K. Padhy and A. Chandrasekhar, Photos: topology optimization of photonic components using a shape library, Engineering with Computers41, 1141 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Norato, R

    J. Norato, R. Haber, D. Tortorelli, and M. P. Bendsøe, A geometry projection method for shape optimiza- tion, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering60, 2289 (2004)

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    J. A. Norato, B. K. Bell, and D. A. Tortorelli, A geometry projection method for continuum-based topology optimization with discrete elements, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering293, 306 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    F. Wein, P. D. Dunning, and J. A. Norato, A review on feature-mapping methods for structural optimiza- tion, Structural and multidisciplinary optimization62, 1597 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Pyvovar, H

    N. Pyvovar, H. Li, Z. Dai, and O. D. Miller, Many-mode grating couplers by avoiding undesired couplings, In preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  72. [72]

    J. Zhu, J. Liu, T. Xu, S. Yuan, Z. Zhang, H. Jiang, H. Gu, R. Zhou, and S. Liu, Optical wafer defect inspection at the 10 nm technology node and beyond, International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing4, 032001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    N. G. Orji, M. Badaroglu, B. M. Barnes, C. Beitia, B. D. Bunday, U. Celano, R. J. Kline, M. Neisser, Y. Obeng, and A. Vladar, Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices, Nature electronics 1, 532 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    A. J. Den Boef, Optical wafer metrology sensors for process-robust cd and overlay control in semiconductor device manufacturing, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties4, 023001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges, Applied physics reviews6(2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Michaels and E

    A. Michaels and E. Yablonovitch, Leveraging continuous material averaging for inverse electromagnetic design, Optics express26, 31717 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    W. Xue, H. Zhang, A. Gopal, V. Rokhlin, and O. D. Miller, Fullwave design of cm-scale cylindrical 14 metasurfaces via fast direct solvers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08569 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Mack,Fundamental principles of optical lithography: the science of microfabrication(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    C. Mack,Fundamental principles of optical lithography: the science of microfabrication(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    work page 2008

  79. [79]

    C. Vieu, F. Carcenac, A. P´ epin, Y. Chen, M. Mejias, A. Lebib, L. Manin-Ferlazzo, L. Couraud, and H. Launois, Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications, Applied surface science164, 111 (2000)

    work page 2000

  80. [80]

    O. D. Miller,Photonic design: From fundamental solar cell physics to computational inverse design, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2012)

    work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.