pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03024 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Uncovering the multi-scale structure of dust distribution in nearby galaxies

E. Tanchon , M. Boquien , J. Chastenet , D. A. Dale , O. V. Egorov , R. Indebetouw , R. S. Klessen , S. E. Meidt
show 13 more authors
D. Pathak J. Sutter D. A. Thilker A. Amiri A. T. Barnes F. Bigiel I. S. Gerasimov S. C. O. Glover K. Grasha K. L. Larson J. C. Lee H.-A. Pan T. G. Williams
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords multi-scale dust structurePAH emissionJWST-MIRIHII regionsprobability distribution functionsdiffuse ISMnearby galaxiesconstrained diffusion decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

PAH fraction in galaxy dust drops below 300 parsecs due to destruction in HII regions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies a decomposition technique to high-resolution mid-infrared images from JWST to study dust emission across scales in nearby galaxies. It reveals a change in behavior around 300 parsecs where the contribution from PAHs decreases at smaller scales, pointing to their destruction in regions of intense star formation. A similar scale near 200 parsecs marks the shift in how dense structures are distributed compared to the diffuse interstellar medium. Understanding these transitions matters because it links small-scale physical processes like radiation and shocks to the overall dust and gas properties that influence star formation. The work demonstrates how advanced imaging can isolate the roles of compact versus extended emission sources.

Core claim

We use the constrained diffusion decomposition algorithm on JWST-MIRI images of nearby star-forming galaxies to separate mid-infrared emission into components at varying physical scales. This reveals a transition scale of PAH emission around 300 pc, with a weaker PAH fraction at smaller scales that highlights the destruction of PAHs in HII regions. Variations in the PAH fraction are also seen across different morphological environments, being smaller in bright and star-forming areas. Comparing probability distribution functions, we find a separation scale around 200 pc where dense structures follow a power-law distribution while the diffuse ISM follows a log-normal one.

What carries the argument

The constrained diffusion decomposition (CDD) algorithm, which separates emission from compact regions versus diffuse sources across a continuum of scales.

If this is right

  • PAH emission properties vary with scale and environment, with destruction prominent in small-scale HII regions.
  • The probability distribution functions of emission change character at around 200 pc, separating dense and diffuse components.
  • Mid-IR spectral properties of the ISM can be quantified at specific scale intervals.
  • Morphological differences affect the observed PAH fractions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying this method to more galaxies could test if the transition scales are universal.
  • The findings suggest that ISM models should incorporate scale-dependent PAH survival rates.
  • Higher resolution data might pinpoint the exact mechanisms of PAH destruction.

Load-bearing premise

The constrained diffusion decomposition cleanly separates compact and diffuse emissions without scale-dependent artifacts or biases that could produce spurious transitions in PAH fraction or PDFs.

What would settle it

Observing no change in PAH fraction or PDF shape when applying the decomposition at scales below 300 pc, or obtaining inconsistent results with an independent decomposition method, would challenge the identified transition scales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03024 by A. Amiri, A. T. Barnes, D. A. Dale, D. A. Thilker, D. Pathak, E. Tanchon, F. Bigiel, H.-A. Pan, I. S. Gerasimov, J. Chastenet, J. C. Lee, J. Sutter, K. Grasha, K. L. Larson, M. Boquien, O. V. Egorov, R. Indebetouw, R. S. Klessen, S. C. O. Glover, S. E. Meidt, T. G. Williams.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Environmental masks and HII region masks for NGC4321 at 7.7 µm. The HII regions are highlighted with white contour and the environmental regions are shown by shaded areas. tary to the spiral regions. As some galaxies do not have spiral arms, the regions not corresponding to any other structures are labelled as disk. 2.3. Constrained Diffusion Decomposition Method To separate the different structures of the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of the decomposition at different scales for NGC4321 at 7.7 µm. An alternative version of this plot with all scales is shown in Appendix A.1. consistent with the ratio of flux of 8 µm over 24 µm observations widely used in earlier work as a tracer of qPAH with Spitzer data (e.g., Engelbracht et al. 2005, 2008; Sandstrom et al. 2010). Deriving qPAH maps necessitates full SED modelling, which, for ou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Median RPAH values for all galaxies at each scale. Galaxies are colour-coded by SFR in increasing order with the lower SFR in dark green and the higher SFR in brown. The galaxies marked with a star are called outliers in the following. the scales’ PDF is not equal to the whole image PDF. This is ex￾pected, as the PDF in each scale only traces the flux distribution in the specific scale, and all PDFs are no… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean of RPAH values at a given scale for each galaxy in different environments. HII regions are indicated by a star and diffuse regions by a circle. Each point shows the average of the median RPAH value in all the galaxies, excluding NGC1365 and NGC3351, having this environment (written as ngal in each plots) and the error bar presents the standard deviation of the RPAH value at each scale for the whole sa… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PDF in two different filters for NGC0628.The green lines show the PDF for each scale of the decomposition, and the black dashed-dotted line corresponds to the sum of all these PDFs. The orange, shaded PDF is the one of the original image. mal emissivity for wavelengths longer than 20 µm (Draine et al. 2021). While PAH destruction decreases MIR emission in HII regions, the increased thermal emissivity enhan… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fraction of flux inside of HII regions in large-scale images compared to HII regions flux in small-scale images. Each point is the mean flux fraction in the large scale image as a function the mean brightness in the small scale image for an HII region. Galaxies are colour-coded by SFR in increasing order. The black contours show the 1σ (dotted), 2σ (dashed), 3σ (plain line) of the total distribution. The c… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flux weighted RPAH for all galaxies at each scale. Galaxies are colour-coded by SFR in increasing order. The outliers of view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-resolution JWST-MIRI images now allow us to resolve in great detail the multi-scale nature of the emission in nearby star-forming galaxies, from compact star-forming regions to large-scale diffuse emission, giving new insights into dust emission, its composition, and the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM). We aim to understand at which scale the different processes driving dust emission in mid-infrared (7.7-21 um) wavelengths take place and if we can disentangle dense regions' emission from emission linked to a more diffuse component. We use and enhance the constrained diffusion decomposition (CDD) algorithm, an alternative to the wavelet transform decomposition, to disentangle the emission coming from compact regions from the emission originating from diffuse sources. This allows us to cleanly quantify the mid-IR spectral properties of the ISM at intervals within a continuum of physical scales. We find a transition scale of PAH emission around 300 pc, with weaker PAH fraction at smaller scales, highlighting the destruction of PAHs in HII regions. We also show variations in the PAH fraction in different morphological environments, with a smaller fraction in bright and star-forming environments. Studying and comparing the probability distribution functions (PDFs) of HII regions and diffuse ISM with the PDFs at different scales, we find a similar separation scale around 200 pc at which we observe a transition from a power-law PDF for dense structures to a log-normal one for the diffuse ISM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies an enhanced constrained diffusion decomposition (CDD) algorithm to high-resolution JWST-MIRI mid-IR (7.7-21 μm) images of nearby star-forming galaxies. This separates compact HII-region emission from diffuse ISM emission across a continuum of physical scales, revealing a PAH-fraction transition near 300 pc (weaker at smaller scales, interpreted as PAH destruction in HII regions), environmental variations in PAH fraction, and a PDF transition near 200 pc from power-law (dense structures) to log-normal (diffuse ISM).

Significance. If the CDD separation is validated as free of scale-dependent artifacts, the work would offer a useful quantitative framework for linking mid-IR dust properties to ISM structure at resolved scales, particularly PAH processing in star-forming regions and the characteristic scales of density PDF regimes. The application of JWST data to enable scale-continuous analysis is a clear strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (CDD enhancement)] The enhancement and application of the constrained diffusion decomposition algorithm (described in the methods) lacks any validation on synthetic images containing known compact and diffuse components at controlled scales. Without such tests, it is impossible to rule out that the reported 200 pc and 300 pc transitions arise from residual cross-scale leakage or parameter-dependent features in the decomposition rather than astrophysical signals.
  2. [Results (PAH fraction and PDF sections)] The PAH-fraction transition at ~300 pc and the PDF shape transition at ~200 pc are presented as key results without reported uncertainties, sensitivity analysis to CDD constraint parameters, or comparison against an alternative decomposition (e.g., wavelets). These omissions make it difficult to assess robustness of the quoted scales.
  3. [Results and discussion] Error estimation and propagation through the CDD pipeline are not described for the derived quantities (PAH fractions, PDF parameters). This is especially relevant given that the central claims rest on precise identification of transition scales.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could briefly specify the nature of the CDD enhancement to help readers immediately grasp the methodological advance.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the physical scales corresponding to each decomposed component for easier interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review, which has helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (CDD enhancement)] The enhancement and application of the constrained diffusion decomposition algorithm (described in the methods) lacks any validation on synthetic images containing known compact and diffuse components at controlled scales. Without such tests, it is impossible to rule out that the reported 200 pc and 300 pc transitions arise from residual cross-scale leakage or parameter-dependent features in the decomposition rather than astrophysical signals.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not include explicit validation tests on synthetic images with controlled compact and diffuse components. The CDD approach builds on prior work where its performance was characterized, and our results on real JWST data align with independent literature scales for PAH processing and density PDF transitions. To directly address the concern of possible artifacts, we will add a new subsection to the Methods section presenting synthetic image tests that inject known compact sources and diffuse backgrounds at scales around 200-300 pc. These tests will quantify any cross-scale leakage and confirm that the reported transitions are robust. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results (PAH fraction and PDF sections)] The PAH-fraction transition at ~300 pc and the PDF shape transition at ~200 pc are presented as key results without reported uncertainties, sensitivity analysis to CDD constraint parameters, or comparison against an alternative decomposition (e.g., wavelets). These omissions make it difficult to assess robustness of the quoted scales.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative uncertainties and sensitivity checks were not provided. In the revised manuscript we will report uncertainties on the transition scales derived from bootstrap resampling of the scale-dependent measurements. We will also add a sensitivity analysis varying the key CDD constraint parameters (diffusion rate and compactness threshold) to demonstrate that the ~300 pc and ~200 pc features remain stable. A brief comparison to a wavelet-based decomposition will be included in an appendix to show that the main transition scales are recovered with both methods, while noting the advantages of CDD for handling the non-Gaussian statistics of the mid-IR maps. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results and discussion] Error estimation and propagation through the CDD pipeline are not described for the derived quantities (PAH fractions, PDF parameters). This is especially relevant given that the central claims rest on precise identification of transition scales.

    Authors: We accept that a clear description of error estimation and propagation was missing. The revised Methods section will include a dedicated paragraph explaining how uncertainties are estimated at each stage of the CDD pipeline, including Poisson noise in the input images, parameter uncertainties in the decomposition, and propagation to the derived PAH fractions and PDF shape parameters. Monte Carlo realizations of the full pipeline will be used to obtain confidence intervals on the transition scales themselves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical scale measurements from data decomposition

full rationale

The paper applies the constrained diffusion decomposition algorithm to JWST-MIRI imaging data to extract multi-scale emission components and then directly measures transition scales (PAH fraction drop near 300 pc; PDF shape change near 200 pc) from the resulting maps. These reported scales are observational outputs of the decomposition pipeline applied to external data, not quantities defined by or fitted to the same parameters used to claim the transitions. No equations, self-definitional relations, or load-bearing self-citations reduce the central results to the inputs by construction. The analysis remains a self-contained empirical measurement whose validity hinges on the algorithm's fidelity rather than logical circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the CDD algorithm separates physical components without scale-dependent bias and that the resulting PAH fractions and PDF shapes map directly to ISM processes; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Constrained diffusion decomposition cleanly isolates compact versus diffuse mid-IR emission across a continuum of scales without introducing artifacts that could produce spurious transitions.
    Invoked when the authors state they use and enhance CDD to disentangle emissions and quantify spectral properties at different scales.
  • domain assumption PAH emission fraction and PDF shape are reliable tracers of dust destruction in HII regions and of dense versus diffuse ISM regimes.
    Used to interpret the measured drop in PAH fraction below 300 pc and the PDF transition at 200 pc as physical.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1534 out tokens · 64176 ms · 2026-05-08T17:40:00.060131+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V ., Leitner, S

    Agertz, O., Kravtsov, A. V ., Leitner, S. N., & Gnedin, N. Y . 2013, ApJ, 770, 25

    2013

  2. [2]

    J., Tielens, A

    Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1989, ApJS, 71, 733 Article number, page 11 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main 102 103 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 IC5332 NGC5068 NGC0628 NGC7496 NGC2835 NGC1433 NGC3351 NGC1512 NGC1300 NGC4535 NGC1087 NGC1365 NGC1385 NGC4321 NGC1566 NGC4254 NGC4303 NGC3627 NGC1672 Scales (pc) R pah Fig. 8: Flux we...

    1989

  3. [3]

    S., Lee, J

    Anand, G. S., Lee, J. C., Van Dyk, S. D., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501, 3621, publisher: OUP ADS Bibcode: 2021MNRAS.501.3621A

    2021

  4. [4]

    T., Gordon, K

    Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Gordon, K. D., & Sandstrom, K. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 123, 1218, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2011PASP..123.1218A

    2011

  5. [5]

    T., Hunt, L

    Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Hunt, L. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 150 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167

    2020

  6. [6]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    1981

  7. [7]

    T., Chandar, R., Kreckel, K., et al

    Barnes, A. T., Chandar, R., Kreckel, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.11778

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    T., Glover, S

    Barnes, A. T., Glover, S. C. O., Kreckel, K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5362

    2021

  9. [9]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Bazzi, Z., Colombo, D., Bigiel, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.06596

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    K., Sun, J., et al

    Belfiore, F., Leroy, A. K., Sun, J., et al. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 670, A67, publisher: EDP ADS Bibcode: 2023A&A...670A..67B

    2023

  11. [11]

    Bergin, E. A. & Tafalla, M. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 339

    2007

  12. [12]

    Berkhuijsen, E. M. & Fletcher, A. 2008, MNRAS, 390, L19 Berné, O., Habart, É., Peeters, E., et al. 2022a, PASP, 134, 054301 Berné, O., Habart, É., Peeters, E., et al. 2022b, PASP, 134, 054301

    2008

  13. [13]

    A., Freedman, W

    Bernstein, R. A., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 2002, ApJ, 571, 107

    2002

  14. [14]

    R., Gautier, A

    Bocchio, M., Micelotta, E. R., Gautier, A. L., & Jones, A. P. 2012, A&A, 545, A124

    2012

  15. [15]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A103

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y ., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 622, A103

    2019

  16. [16]

    2013, A&A, 554, A70

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V ., Gruppioni, C., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A70

    2013

  17. [17]

    M., Loomis, R

    Burkhardt, A. M., Loomis, R. A., Shingledecker, C. N., et al. 2021, Nature As- tronomy, 5, 181

    2021

  18. [18]

    2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Calzetti, D. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 414, Cosmic Dust - Near and Far, ed. T. Henning, E. Grün, & J. Steinacker, 214

    2009

  19. [19]

    C., Engelbracht, C

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870

    2007

  20. [20]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  21. [21]

    T., Thilker, D

    Chandar, R., Barnes, A. T., Thilker, D. A., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 150

    2025

  22. [22]

    2023, ApJ, 944, L11

    Chastenet, J., Sutter, J., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L11

    2023

  23. [23]

    2024, A&A, 685, A75

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A75

    2024

  24. [24]

    G., Braine, J., & Thilker, D

    Corbelli, E., Elmegreen, B. G., Braine, J., & Thilker, D. 2018, A&A, 617, A125

    2018

  25. [25]

    A., Candian, A., Berné, O., & Tielens, A

    Croiset, B. A., Candian, A., Berné, O., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2016, A&A, 590, A26

    2016

  26. [26]

    A., Helou, G., Contursi, A., Silbermann, N

    Dale, D. A., Helou, G., Contursi, A., Silbermann, N. A., & Kolhatkar, S. 2001, ApJ, 549, 215

    2001

  27. [27]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium (Prince- ton University Press)

    2011

  28. [28]

    Draine, B. T. & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810

    2007

  29. [29]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3

    2021

  30. [30]

    V ., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K

    Egorov, O. V ., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K. M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 944, L16

    2023

  31. [31]

    V ., Leroy, A

    Egorov, O. V ., Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A103

    2025

  32. [32]

    Elmegreen, B. G. & Elmegreen, D. M. 2001, AJ, 121, 1507

    2001

  33. [33]

    2022, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 659, A191, publisher: EDP Sciences

    Emsellem, E., Schinnerer, E., Santoro, F., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 659, A191, publisher: EDP Sciences

    2022

  34. [34]

    W., Gordon, K

    Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, L29

    2005

  35. [35]

    W., Rieke, G

    Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 804

    2008

  36. [36]

    S., & Schmidt, W

    Federrath, C., Klessen, R. S., & Schmidt, W. 2008, ApJ, 688, L79

    2008

  37. [37]

    2023, A&A, 672, A193

    Fensch, J., Bournaud, F., Brucy, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A193

    2023

  38. [38]

    2022, A&A, 667, A29

    Figueira, M., Pollo, A., Małek, K., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A29

    2022

  39. [39]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 115

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 115

    2024

  40. [40]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.06481

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.06481

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4902, publisher: OUP ADS Bibcode: 2023MN- RAS.520.4902G

    Groves, B., Kreckel, K., Santoro, F., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4902, publisher: OUP ADS Bibcode: 2023MN- RAS.520.4902G

    2023

  42. [42]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  43. [43]

    & Falgarone, E

    Hennebelle, P. & Falgarone, E. 2012, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 20

    2012

  44. [44]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  45. [45]

    2014, Science, 344, 183

    Kainulainen, J., Federrath, C., & Henning, T. 2014, Science, 344, 183

    2014

  46. [46]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics, 50, 531, aDS Bibcode: 2012ARA&A..50..531K

    2012

  47. [47]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 215

    Kim, J., Chevance, M., Ramambason, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 215

    2025

  48. [48]

    D., Johnston, K

    Klaassen, P. D., Johnston, K. G., Urquhart, J. S., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1712.04735

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    & Ostriker, E

    Koyama, H. & Ostriker, E. C. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1346

    2009

  50. [50]

    G., Norman, M

    Kritsuk, A. G., Norman, M. L., Padoan, P., & Wagner, R. 2007, ApJ, 665, 416

    2007

  51. [51]

    E., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    Lang, P., Meidt, S. E., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 122

    2020

  52. [52]

    Latter, W. B. 1991, ApJ, 377, 187

    1991

  53. [53]

    C., Sandstrom, K

    Lee, J. C., Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L17

    2023

  54. [54]

    K., Hughes, A., Liu, D., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Hughes, A., Liu, D., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Sup- plement Series, 255, 19, publisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2021ApJS..255...19L

    2021

  55. [55]

    K., Sandstrom, K

    Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K. M., Lang, D., et al. 2019, ApJS, 244, 24

    2019

  56. [56]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339

    Li, A. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339

    2020

  57. [57]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 259, 59, pub- lisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2022ApJS..259...59L

    Li, G.-X. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 259, 59, pub- lisher: IOP ADS Bibcode: 2022ApJS..259...59L

    2022

  58. [58]

    Lind-Thomsen, C., Sneppen, A., & Steinhardt, C. L. 2025, ApJ, 985, 144

    2025

  59. [59]

    2009, A&A, 493, 735

    Lombardi, M. 2009, A&A, 493, 735

    2009

  60. [60]

    C., Thilker, D

    Maschmann, D., Lee, J. C., Thilker, D. A., et al. 2024, ApJS, 273, 14

    2024

  61. [61]

    2024, A&A, 689, A79

    Matsumoto, K., Hirashita, H., Nagamine, K., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A79

    2024

  62. [62]

    E., Leroy, A

    Meidt, S. E., Leroy, A. K., Querejeta, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 113

    2021

  63. [63]

    E., Rosolowsky, E., Sun, J., et al

    Meidt, S. E., Rosolowsky, E., Sun, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L18 Article number, page 12 E. Tanchon et al.: Uncovering the multi-scale structure of dust distribution in nearby galaxies

    2023

  64. [64]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2010, A&A, 510, A36

    2010

  65. [65]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2011, A&A, 526, A52

    2011

  66. [66]

    2013, A&A, 552, A15

    Montillaud, J., Joblin, C., & Toublanc, D. 2013, A&A, 552, A15

    2013

  67. [67]

    Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  68. [68]

    2011, ApJ, 735, 6

    Paradis, D., Paladini, R., Noriega-Crespo, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 6

    2011

  69. [69]

    K., Thompson, T

    Pathak, D., Leroy, A. K., Thompson, T. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 140

    2025

  70. [70]

    K., Thompson, T

    Pathak, D., Leroy, A. K., Thompson, T. A., et al. 2023, A Two-Component Prob- ability Distribution Function Describes the mid-IR Emission from the Disks of Star-Forming Galaxies, arXiv:2311.18067 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    S., Stone, J

    Povich, M. S., Stone, J. M., Churchwell, E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 346

    2007

  72. [72]

    2021, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 656, A133, publisher: EDP ADS Bibcode: 2021A&A...656A.133Q Relaño, M., De Looze, I., Kennicutt, R

    Querejeta, M., Schinnerer, E., Meidt, S., et al. 2021, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 656, A133, publisher: EDP ADS Bibcode: 2021A&A...656A.133Q Relaño, M., De Looze, I., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2018, A&A, 613, A43

    2021

  73. [73]

    1998, in Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat

    Rubner, Y ., Tomasi, C., & Guibas, L. 1998, in Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271), 59–66

    1998

  74. [74]

    M., Bolatto, A

    Sandstrom, K. M., Bolatto, A. D., Draine, B. T., Bot, C., & Stanimirovi ´c, S. 2010, ApJ, 715, 701

    2010

  75. [75]

    M., Koch, E

    Sandstrom, K. M., Koch, E. W., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L8

    2023

  76. [76]

    & Leroy, A

    Schinnerer, E. & Leroy, A. K. 2024, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics, 62, 369, aDS Bibcode: 2024ARA&A..62..369S

    2024

  77. [77]

    2015, A&A, 575, A79

    Schneider, N., Ossenkopf, V ., Csengeri, T., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A79

    2015

  78. [78]

    V ., Papovich, C., Rieke, G

    Shipley, H. V ., Papovich, C., Rieke, G. H., Brown, M. J. I., & Moustakas, J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 60 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. 2000, SAOImage DS9: A utility for dis- playing astronomical images in the X11 window environment, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:0003.002

    2016

  79. [79]

    L., Donoho, D

    Starck, J. L., Donoho, D. L., & Candès, E. J. 2003, A&A, 398, 785

    2003

  80. [80]

    K., Schruba, A., et al

    Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., Schruba, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 172

    2018

Showing first 80 references.