pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04672 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.RO

AI-Aided Advancements in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation

Guy Damari , Zeev Yampolsky , Nadav Cohen , Arup Kumar Sahoo , Jeryes Danial , Felipe O. Silva , Itzik Klein This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords autonomous underwater vehiclesAI navigationsensor fusioninertial navigationdead-reckoningdoppler velocity logunderwater roboticsmarine positioning
0
0 comments X

The pith

AI-driven learning approaches enhance inertial dead-reckoning and adaptive fusion for high-precision AUV navigation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review chapter examines recent progress in using artificial intelligence to improve positioning for autonomous underwater vehicles that cannot rely on satellite signals. It focuses on sensor fusion methods that combine inertial navigation with Doppler velocity logs and cameras, showing how AI techniques are advancing beyond traditional filtering to handle dead-reckoning and adaptive integration. A reader would care because these vehicles support deep-sea research and commercial tasks that require reliable location data in unpredictable ocean conditions. The work outlines milestones to map a path toward the precision needed for fully autonomous missions.

Core claim

Beyond traditional model-based filtering, AI-driven learning approaches are emerging to enhance inertial dead-reckoning tasks and adaptive fusion algorithms, providing a roadmap for high-precision AUV navigation in environments where electromagnetic signals are unavailable and marine conditions are dynamic.

What carries the argument

Advanced sensor fusion architectures integrating inertial navigation systems with Doppler velocity logs and cameras, augmented by AI-driven learning for dead-reckoning and adaptive algorithms.

If this is right

  • AUVs achieve higher positioning precision for extended deep-sea operations without external references.
  • Adaptive fusion algorithms respond more effectively to changing underwater conditions.
  • Inertial dead-reckoning errors are reduced through learned corrections rather than fixed models.
  • A structured path emerges for combining AI with existing sensors to support autonomous missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same AI fusion patterns could transfer to other signal-denied settings such as caves or planetary surfaces if the marine-specific training data generalizes.
  • Hardware costs for AUVs might decrease if software-based learning compensates for lower-grade sensors.
  • Real-world validation would require side-by-side runs against traditional filters under documented environmental disturbances.

Load-bearing premise

The reviewed AI methods will reliably handle the dynamic unpredictability of the marine environment when integrated with traditional sensors.

What would settle it

A controlled sea trial in variable currents and low visibility where an AI-enhanced fusion system loses position accuracy faster than a non-AI baseline over the same distance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04672 by Arup Kumar Sahoo, Felipe O. Silva, Guy Damari, Itzik Klein, Jeryes Danial, Nadav Cohen, Zeev Yampolsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: General block diagram showing the navigation process as block as such that each block is enhanced by data-driven view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: DCNet data-flow and training process diagram. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The University of Haifa’s Snapir AUV during a mission in the Mediterranean Sea. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: HeadingNet observation vector information flow and loss calculation during training. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the two main deep learning-based approaches to improve INS/DVL navigation performance. (a) view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Trajectories T1, T2, T3, T5, T6, T7, and T8 belong to the training set, and T10, T11, and T13 are part of the testing view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have become indispensable for deep-sea exploration, spanning critical scientific research and commercial applications. The rapid attenuation of electromagnetic waves renders satellite radio signals unavailable, while the dynamic unpredictability of the marine environment presents formidable navigation challenges. This chapter explores recent advancements in AI-aided AUV positioning, specifically focusing on advanced sensor fusion architectures that integrate inertial navigation systems with Doppler velocity logs and cameras. Beyond traditional model-based filtering, we examine the transformative emergence of AI-driven learning approaches in enhancing inertial dead-reckoning tasks and adaptive fusion algorithms. By addressing these recent milestones, this chapter provides a comprehensive roadmap for achieving the high-precision navigation essential for autonomous underwater missions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey chapter on AI-aided advancements in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) navigation. It outlines the challenges of underwater positioning due to electromagnetic attenuation and marine dynamics, then reviews sensor fusion architectures that combine inertial navigation systems with Doppler velocity logs and cameras. The central focus is the shift from traditional model-based filtering to AI-driven learning methods for improving inertial dead-reckoning and adaptive fusion algorithms, concluding with a roadmap for high-precision autonomous missions.

Significance. As a literature synthesis, the chapter consolidates recent work on AI integration for AUV navigation and could serve as a useful entry point for researchers in marine robotics. Its descriptive claim that AI approaches enhance dead-reckoning and fusion follows directly from cited studies and does not require new empirical validation. However, without quantitative comparisons, error analyses, or critical discussion of limitations in the reviewed methods, the significance remains modest and primarily organizational rather than transformative.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract asserts a 'transformative emergence' of AI-driven approaches but provides no specific examples, performance metrics, or citations in the provided text; this should be supported with concrete references or a dedicated subsection summarizing key studies and their reported improvements.
  2. The manuscript describes integration of inertial systems with Doppler velocity logs and cameras but does not address potential failure modes or environmental factors (e.g., turbidity affecting cameras) that could undermine the claimed high-precision outcomes; a brief limitations paragraph would strengthen the roadmap section.
  3. Notation for sensor fusion architectures is introduced without an accompanying diagram or table summarizing the reviewed methods, their inputs/outputs, and reported accuracy gains; adding such a summary table would improve readability for a survey chapter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that the manuscript serves as a useful literature synthesis on AI-aided AUV navigation. We agree that enhancing the critical discussion of limitations will improve the chapter and have revised the manuscript to incorporate this feedback.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: However, without quantitative comparisons, error analyses, or critical discussion of limitations in the reviewed methods, the significance remains modest and primarily organizational rather than transformative.

    Authors: As a survey chapter, the manuscript synthesizes existing literature rather than presenting new empirical results, and we concur with the referee that new quantitative comparisons or error analyses are not required. To address the point on critical discussion, we have added a dedicated subsection that examines limitations of the reviewed AI-driven methods, including challenges related to training data scarcity in underwater environments, robustness to sensor noise and marine dynamics, generalization across different AUV platforms, and computational overhead for real-time deployment. These points are drawn directly from the cited studies and provide a balanced perspective on the current state of the field. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: descriptive survey without derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is a review chapter surveying AI-aided methods for AUV navigation from existing literature. It presents no new equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains of its own. All claims about enhancements to dead-reckoning and fusion are descriptive summaries of cited prior studies rather than internally generated results that could reduce to the paper's inputs by construction. No self-citations function as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes; the work is self-contained as a roadmap based on external references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper, the central claim rests on the accuracy of summarized prior literature rather than new derivations, parameters, or entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5429 in / 846 out tokens · 57335 ms · 2026-05-08T17:48:45.824053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. C. Kinsey, R. M. Eustice, L. L. Whitcomb, A survey of underwater vehicle navigation: Recent advances and new challenges, in: IFAC conference of manoeuvering and control of marine craft, Vol. 88, Lisbon, 2006, pp. 1–12

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Paull, S

    L. Paull, S. Saeedi, M. Seto, H. Li, AUV navigation and localization: A review, IEEE Journal of oceanic engineering 39 (1) (2013) 131–149

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    R. B. Wynn, V. A. Huvenne, T. P. Le Bas, B. J. Murton, D. P. Connelly, B. J. Bett, H. A. Ruhl, K. J. Morris, J. Peakall, D. R. Parsons, et al., Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs): Their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience, Marine geology 352 (2014) 451–468

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Stutters, H

    L. Stutters, H. Liu, C. Tiltman, D. J. Brown, Navigation technologies for autonomous underwater vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38 (4) (2008) 581–589

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Zhang, D

    B. Zhang, D. Ji, S. Liu, X. Zhu, W. Xu, Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation: A review, Ocean Engineering 273 (2023) 113861

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    J. J. Leonard, A. Bahr, Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation, Springer handbook of ocean engi- neering (2016) 341–358

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Alexandris, P

    C. Alexandris, P. Papageorgas, D. Piromalis, Positioning systems for unmanned underwater vehicles: A comprehensive review, Applied Sciences 14 (21) (2024) 9671. 20

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Zhang, H

    T. Zhang, H. Shi, L. Chen, Y. Li, J. Tong, AUV positioning method based on tightly coupled SINS/LBL for underwater acoustic multipath propagation, Sensors 16 (3) (2016) 357

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Y. Wu, X. Ta, R. Xiao, Y. Wei, D. An, D. Li, Survey of underwater robot positioning navigation, Applied Ocean Research 90 (2019) 101845

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    P. D. Groves, Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, 2013

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    D. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Yao, T. Zhang, Y. Zhu, A novel SINS/DVL tightly integrated navigation method for complex environment, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69 (7) (2019) 5183– 5196

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Titterton, J

    D. Titterton, J. L. Weston, Strapdown inertial navigation technology, Vol. 17, IET, 2004

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    N. A. Brokloff, Matrix algorithm for Doppler sonar navigation, in: Proceedings of OCEANS’94, Vol. 3, IEEE, 1994, pp. III–378

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    J. C. Kinsey, L. L. Whitcomb, In situ alignment calibration of attitude and Doppler sensors for precision underwater vehicle navigation: Theory and experiment, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 32 (2) (2007) 286–299

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    D. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Yang, T. Zhang, A quasi-Newton quaternions calibration method for DVL error aided GNSS, IEEE transactions on vehicular technology 70 (3) (2021) 2465–2477

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Barrau, S

    A. Barrau, S. Bonnabel, The invariant extended Kalman filter as a stable observer, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 62 (4) (2017) 1797–1812

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    S. J. Julier, J. K. Uhlmann, New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems, in: Signal processing, sensor fusion, and target recognition VI, Vol. 3068, Spie, 1997, pp. 182–193

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    Bar-Shalom, X

    Y. Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation: theory algorithms and software, John Wiley & Sons, 2001

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Farrell, Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2008

    J. Farrell, Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2008

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    B. Xu, Y. Guo, J. Hu, An improved robust Kalman filter for SINS/DVL tightly integrated navigation system, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 70 (2021) 1–15

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Frutuoso, F

    A. Frutuoso, F. O. Silva, E. A. de Barros, Performance evaluation of coarse alignment methods for autonomous underwater vehicles in mooring conditions, Ocean Engineering 282 (2023) 114991

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Troni, L

    G. Troni, L. L. Whitcomb, New methods for in-situ calibration of attitude and Doppler sensors for underwater vehicle navigation: Preliminary results, in: OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–8. 21

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Zhaopeng, T

    L. Zhaopeng, T. Kanghua, W. Meiping, Online estimation of DVL misalignment angle in SINS/DVL integrated navigation system, in: IEEE 2011 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, Vol. 2, IEEE, 2011, pp. 336–339

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Diker, I

    B. Diker, I. Klein, Neural Aided Adaptive Innovation-Based Invariant Kalman Filter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.26709 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    A. Levy, I. Klein, Adaptive neural unscented kalman filter, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2026)

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Cohen, I

    N. Cohen, I. Klein, BeamsNet: A Data-driven Approach Enhancing Doppler Velocity Log Measurements for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 114 (2022) 105216

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Klein, Y

    I. Klein, Y. Lipman, Continuous INS/DVL Fusion in Situations of DVL Outages, in: 2020 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Symposium (AUV), 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Topini, F

    E. Topini, F. Fanelli, A. Topini, M. Pebody, A. Ridolfi, A. B. Phillips, B. Allotta, An experimental com- parison of deep learning strategies for AUV navigation in DVL-denied environments, Ocean Engineering 274 (2023) 114034

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    P. Liu, B. Wang, Z. Deng, M. Fu, INS/DVL/PS tightly coupled underwater navigation method with limited DVL measurements, IEEE Sensors Journal 18 (7) (2018) 2994–3002

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    J. Qin, M. Li, D. Li, J. Zhong, K. Yang, A survey on visual navigation and positioning for autonomous UUVs, Remote Sensing 14 (15) (2022) 3794

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Heshmat, L

    M. Heshmat, L. Saad Saoud, M. Abujabal, A. Sultan, M. Elmezain, L. Seneviratne, I. Hussain, Under- water SLAM meets deep learning: challenges, multi-sensor integration, and future directions, Sensors 25 (11) (2025) 3258

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Raissi, P

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning frame- work for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Computational physics 378 (2019) 686–707

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Xu, C.-B

    P.-F. Xu, C.-B. Han, H.-X. Cheng, C. Cheng, T. Ge, A physics-informed neural network for the predic- tion of unmanned surface vehicle dynamics, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10 (2) (2022) 148

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    D. Wang, B. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Yao, Online calibration method of DVL error based on improved integrated navigation model, IEEE Sensors Journal 22 (21) (2022) 21082–21092. 22

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    B. Xu, Y. Guo, A novel DVL calibration method based on robust invariant extended Kalman filter, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 71 (9) (2022) 9422–9434

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Yampolsky, I

    Z. Yampolsky, I. Klein, DCNet: A data-driven framework for DVL calibration, Applied Ocean Research 158 (2025) 104525

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    B. Xu, L. Wang, S. Li, J. Zhang, A novel calibration method of SINS/DVL integration navigation system based on quaternion, IEEE Sensors Journal 20 (16) (2020) 9567–9580

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    S. Liu, T. Zhang, Y. Zhu, A GNSS aided calibration method for DVL error based on the optimal- REQUEST, IEEE Sensors Journal 22 (22) (2022) 21899–21910

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    J. A. Farrell, F. O. Silva, F. Rahman, J. Wendel, Inertial Measurement Unit Error Modeling Tutorial: Inertial Navigation System State Estimation with Real-Time Sensor Calibration, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 42 (6) (2022) 40–66.doi:10.1109/MCS.2022.3209059

    work page doi:10.1109/mcs.2022.3209059 2022

  40. [40]

    E. H. Thompson, J. L. Farrell, J. W. Knight, Alignment Methods for Strapdown Inertial Systems, J. Spacecr. Rockets 3 (9) (1966) 1432–1434

    work page 1966

  41. [41]

    K. R. Britting, Inertial Navigation Systems Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Canada, 1971

    work page 1971

  42. [42]

    Wahba, A Least Squares Estimate of Satellite Attitude, SIAM Rev

    G. Wahba, A Least Squares Estimate of Satellite Attitude, SIAM Rev. 8 (3) (1966) 384–386

    work page 1966

  43. [43]

    P. M. G. Silson, Coarse alignment of a ship’s strapdown inertial attitude reference system using velocity loci, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60 (6) (2011) 1930–1941

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Frutuoso, F

    A. Frutuoso, F. O. Silva, E. A. de Barros, Performance evaluation of coarse alignment methods for autonomous underwater vehicles in mooring conditions, Ocean Eng. 282 (2023) 114991.doi:10.1016/ j.oceaneng.2023.114991

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Y. Y. Qin, G. M. Yan, D. Q. Gu, J. B. Zheng, A Clever Way of SINS Coarse Alignment Despite Rocking Ship, J. Northwestern Polytech. Univ. 23 (5) (2005) 681–684

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    F. O. Silva, E. M. Hemerly, W. C. L. Filho, Error Analysis of Analytical Coarse Alignment Formulations for Stationary SINS, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 52 (4) (2016) 1777–1796.doi:10.1109/TAES. 2016.150177

    work page doi:10.1109/taes 2016

  47. [47]

    Yampolsky, F

    Z. Yampolsky, F. O. Silva, A. Frutuoso, I. Klein, Neural-Assisted in-Motion Self-Heading Alignment, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00168 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Engelsman, I

    D. Engelsman, I. Klein, Towards learning-based gyrocompassing, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 163 (2026) 112842.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112842. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625028738 23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112842 2026

  49. [49]

    Wahba, A least squares estimate of satellite attitude, SIAM Review 7 (3) (1965) 409

    G. Wahba, A least squares estimate of satellite attitude, SIAM Review 7 (3) (1965) 409

    work page 1965

  50. [50]

    Umeyama, Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (4) (1991) 376–380

    S. Umeyama, Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (4) (1991) 376–380

    work page 1991

  51. [51]

    Damari, I

    G. Damari, I. Klein, ResAlignNet: A data-driven approach for INS/DVL alignment, Ocean Engineering 356 (2026) 125277

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Damari, I

    G. Damari, I. Klein, A data-driven method for INS/DVL alignment, in: OCEANS Great Lakes Confer- ence, MTS, Chicago, IL, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Cohen, I

    N. Cohen, I. Klein, Adaptive Kalman-Informed Transformer, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 146 (2025) 110221

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Miller, J

    P.A. Miller, J. A.Farrell, Y.Zhao, V.Djapic, Autonomous underwater vehiclenavigation, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 35 (3) (2010) 663–678

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Simon, Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches, John Wiley & Sons, 2006

    D. Simon, Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches, John Wiley & Sons, 2006

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Klein, Y

    I. Klein, Y. Gutnik, Y. Lipman, Estimating DVL velocity in complete beam measurement outage sce- narios, IEEE Sensors Journal 22 (21) (2022) 20730–20737

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Cohen, I

    N. Cohen, I. Klein, LiBeamsNet: AUV velocity vector estimation in situations of limited DVL beam measurements, in: OCEANS 2022, Hampton Roads, IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Cohen, I

    N. Cohen, I. Klein, Seamless Underwater Navigation with Limited Doppler Velocity Log Measurements, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Cohen, I

    N. Cohen, I. Klein, Gaussian Process Regression for Improved Underwater Navigation, in: 2025 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1125–1132

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Stolero, I

    Y. Stolero, I. Klein, AUV acceleration prediction using DVL and deep learning, in: OCEANS 2025 - Great Lakes, 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Ferrera, J

    M. Ferrera, J. Moras, P. Trouvé-Peloux, V. Creuze, Real-Time Monocular Visual Odometry for Turbid and Dynamic Underwater Environments, Sensors 19 (3) (2019).doi:10.3390/s19030687. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/3/687

    work page doi:10.3390/s19030687 2019

  63. [63]

    G. Chen, G. Du, C. Yang, Y. Xu, C. Wu, H. Hu, F. Dong, J. Zeng, An underwater visual SLAM system with adaptive image enhancement, Ocean Engineering 326 (2025) 120896.doi:https://doi.org/10. 24 1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120896. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801825006092

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Weidner, S

    N. Weidner, S. Rahman, A. Q. Li, I. Rekleitis, Underwater cave mapping using stereo vision, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 5709–5715.doi:10. 1109/ICRA.2017.7989672

    work page arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    P. Chen, W. Guan, P. Lu, Esvio: Event-based stereo visual inertial odometry, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8 (6) (2023) 3661–3668

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    J. Niu, S. Zhong, X. Lu, S. Shen, G. Gallego, Y. Zhou, Esvo2: Direct visual-inertial odometry with stereo event cameras, IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Teixeira, H

    B. Teixeira, H. Silva, A. Matos, E. Silva, Deep learning for underwater visual odometry estimation, Ieee Access 8 (2020) 44687–44701

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Rahman, A

    S. Rahman, A. Q. Li, I. Rekleitis, Sonar visual inertial SLAM of underwater structures, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2018, pp. 5190–5196

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Rahman, A

    S. Rahman, A. Q. Li, I. Rekleitis, Svin2: An underwater slam system using sonar, visual, inertial, and depth sensor, in: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1861–1868

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    R. Miao, J. Qian, Y. Song, R. Ying, P. Liu, UniVIO: Unified direct and feature-based underwater stereo visual-inertial odometry, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 71 (2021) 1–14

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    A. K. Sahoo, I. Klein, MoRPI-PINN: A physics-informed framework for mobile robot pure inertial navigation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18206 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    A. K. Sahoo, I. Klein, PiDR: Physics-Informed Inertial Dead Reckoning for Autonomous Platforms, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03040 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    Chakraverty, A

    S. Chakraverty, A. K. Sahoo, D. Mohapatra, Artificial Neural Networks and Type-2 Fuzzy Set: Elements of Soft Computing and Its Applications, Elsevier, 2025

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Etzion, I

    A. Etzion, I. Klein, MoRPI: Mobile robot pure inertial navigation, IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation 1 (2023) 141–150. 25

    work page 2023