pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06657 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Significant heat transfer enhancement via polymer additives in two-dimensional sheared convection

Guanhan Li , Lu Zhu , Rich. R. Kerswell This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords polymer additivesheat transfer enhancementsheared convectionviscoelastic fluidsbuoyancy-driven flowelastic instabilitiesconvective rolls
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polymer additives can increase heat transfer by up to 1100% in two-dimensional sheared convection through hook-like stress structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how polymer additives affect heat dissipation in a two-dimensional thermally stratified Poiseuille flow at Reynolds numbers below 1000. It shows that elasticity-induced centre modes produce almost no heat transfer gain, but buoyancy-driven convective modes experience dramatic enhancement when polymers are present. The boost reaches 1100% because hook-shaped polymer stress patterns reorganize the flow, either by acting as speed bumps that promote mixing or by attaching to walls to create effective polymer walls and strong counter-rotating rolls. This matters for cooling applications since it identifies concrete flow structures that let elastic fluids improve thermal transport, with different regimes suited to rapid temperature adjustment or efficient ongoing heat movement.

Core claim

In two-dimensional thermally-stratified Poiseuille flow, polymers enhance the heat flux of the buoyancy-driven convective mode by up to 1100%. The resulting nonlinear states take the form of periodic orbits or travelling waves dominated by hook-like polymer-stress structures. Unattached hooks reduce streamwise velocity and promote wall-normal motion, while wall-attached hooks reorganize the flow into strong counter-rotating rolls. These states are sustained synergistically by polymer stresses and buoyancy, as confirmed by perturbation kinetic energy budgets. Wall-attached configurations allow rapid thermal equilibration at the expense of high hydraulic resistance, whereas unattached hooks in

What carries the argument

Hook-like polymer-stress structures that attach to walls or remain unattached, reorganizing the flow into rolls or acting as speed bumps to promote mixing while being sustained by the synergy of elasticity and buoyancy.

If this is right

  • Wall-attached hooks enable rapid thermal equilibration but impose a large hydraulic penalty, making them suitable for process streams needing fast temperature adjustment.
  • Unattached hooks provide a more thermally efficient regime for heat-transport applications.
  • The centre mode develops into a nonlinear arrowhead state yielding only about 0.03% heat transfer increase over the conductive state.
  • Perturbation kinetic energy budgets show that polymer stresses and buoyancy sustain the enhanced states in a synergistic manner.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If comparable hook structures emerge in three-dimensional flows, the same enhancement mechanism could apply to practical cooling systems.
  • The contrast between attached and unattached regimes offers a way to tune polymer solutions for either quick thermal response or steady efficient transport.
  • This elasto-buoyant reorganization may appear in other stratified or sheared viscoelastic flows when similar stress concentrations form.

Load-bearing premise

The two-dimensional geometry and chosen viscoelastic constitutive model accurately represent the dynamics of real three-dimensional polymer solutions at the simulated Reynolds numbers.

What would settle it

A three-dimensional simulation or laboratory experiment that fails to produce hook-like polymer stress structures or achieves less than 100% heat flux increase would falsify the reported extreme enhancement for the convective mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06657 by Guanhan Li, Lu Zhu, Rich. R. Kerswell.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the Poiseuille channel flow. The Oldroyd-B model is considered given its (relative) mathematical simplicity and the convenience of scanning the small parameter space. The equations are non-dimensionalised by the centreline speed of the base Poiseuille flow solution 𝑈 ∗ , the half-height of the channel 𝐻, the density at the upper wall 𝜌 ∗ 𝑈𝑊 and the lower wall 𝜌 ∗ 𝐿𝑊, the polymer stress diffusi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Growth rate of the fastest growing mode at (a) 𝑅𝑒 = 50, 𝛽 = 0.98 and (b) 𝑅𝑒 = 800, 𝛽 = 0.8. The black dashed line marks the transition boundary where the dominant mode switches. In each panel, the left black solid line marks 𝑅𝑖 = 0, separating the parameter space into unstable (left) and stable (right) stratification. The right black solid line indicates the existence boundary of the centre mode within the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contours of the eigenfunctions ˜𝑢, ˜𝑤, ˜𝜌, and ˜𝜏𝑥 𝑥 associated with the fastest-growing modes for the representative cases shown in Figures 2. For each case, the streamwise velocity ˜𝑢, wall-normal velocity ˜𝑤, density perturbation ˜𝜌, and polymer stress component ˜𝜏𝑥 𝑥 are displayed in sequence. The panels correspond to: (a) convective mode A; (b) convective mode C; (c) convective mode D; and (d) centre … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variations of the growth rate 𝜔𝑖 with (a) 𝑊 and (b) 𝑅𝑖 at 𝑅𝑒 = 50 and 𝛽 = 0.98, corresponding to the cases in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time evolution of (a) Nusselt number 𝑁𝑢 and (b) perturbation kinetic energy 𝐸𝑝𝑘𝑒 for centre modes E and F in table 1, together with snapshots of tr(𝝉) in the nonlinear resulting state. The growth rates of 𝐸𝑝𝑘𝑒 for centre modes E and F are 0.0062 and 0.0038, respectively, which agree with 2𝜔𝑖 from the linear stability analysis (0.0064 and 0.0038). The tr(𝝉) field for (c) mode E and (d) mode F, with the posi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of (a) Nusselt number 𝑁𝑢 and (b) perturbation kinetic energy 𝐸𝑝𝑘𝑒 for convective modes A, B, C and D in table 1, together with snapshots of the vertical perturbation velocity 𝑤 ′ , overlaid with perturbation velocity streamlines for mode A, and tr(𝝉) for modes B, C, and D in the resulting nonlinear state. The growth rates of 𝐸𝑝𝑘𝑒 for convective modes A, B, C, and D are 0.3678, 0.3456, 0.3026… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variations of ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ with 𝑅𝑒 and 𝑊. (a) Contours of ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ in the 𝑅𝑒–𝑊 parameter space for fixed 𝛽 = 0.98 and 𝑅𝑖 = −0.8. Marks A, B and C correspond to the convective modes A, B and C shown in view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flow structures for fixed 𝛽 = 0.98 and 𝑅𝑖 = −0.8, shown alongside ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ contours. Note that the streamlines are computed in a reference frame moving with the phase speed 𝑐 𝑝, whereas the flow-rate profile 𝑢(𝑦), marked by black arrows, is shown in the laboratory frame. The parabolic velocity profile, marked by black dashed line, corresponding to the base state, 𝑈0 = 1 − 𝑧 2 , is shown for reference. Panel (e… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Transition between wall-detached and wall-attached hook structures: (a-c) instantaneous fields of tr(𝝉) at 𝑡 = 0, 200, 400 and (d) time evolution of bulk velocity 𝑈𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 and Nusselt number ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩, (e) time evolution of maxh tr(𝝉) i and its wall-normal distance. 0 X0-14 view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Contour of energy budget ratio T /B and the flow regime classification overlapped with contours of ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ corresponds to view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cycle period 𝑇 and time-averaged Nusselt number ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ as a function of 𝑊 at 𝑅𝑒 = 100 for fixed 𝛽 = 0.98 and 𝑅𝑖 = −0.8. The black dashed line represents 𝑇. The pink solid line represents ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩, with error bars indicating the full range (maximum to minimum) of 𝑁𝑢 in the periodic orbits, while the pink dashed line denotes the baseline ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ = 1. The red solid line corresponds to the linear fit of 𝑇 versus 𝑊 whe… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Thermal performance factor 𝜂 and Stanton number 𝑆𝑡 contours, corresponds with the 𝑅𝑒 − 𝑊 parameter space in view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Contours of ⟨𝑁𝑢⟩ in the 𝑅𝑒–𝑊 parameter space with FKE and PKE budget terms for fixed 𝛽 = 0.98 and 𝑅𝑖 = −0.8. The blue contour lines represent the ratio of polymer conversion to buoyancy flux, T 𝑓 /B 𝑓 (blue dashed line) and T 𝑝 /B𝑝 (blue solid line), as defined in equation (A 1). Appendix A. The fluctuation kinetic energy (FKE) budget In this section, we perform the classical fluctuating kinetic energy (F… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Heat dissipation is critical in modern engineering systems. Polymer additives offer a potential route to improve fluid-based cooling. Here, we study elasticity-enhanced heat transfer in two-dimensional, thermally-stratified Poiseuille flow. At Reynolds numbers, $Re$, $\lesssim 1000$, we observe two types of linearly unstable modes: the recently identified elasticity-induced centre mode (Khalid et al., J. Fluid Mech. 915, 2021) and the classical buoyancy-driven convective mode (Kelly, Adv. Appl. Mech. 31, 35-112, 1994). Direct numerical simulations show that the centre mode develops into a nonlinear `arrowhead' state but yields negligible heat transfer enhancement (typically $\approx 0.03\%$ increase compared to the conductive state). By contrast, polymers can enhance the heat flux associated with the convective mode by up to $1100\%$. The nonlinear convective-mode states take the form of either periodic orbits or travelling waves, and are dominated by hook-like polymer-stress structures that can attach to the walls. The unattached hooks act as `speed bumps' that reduced streamwise velocity and promote wall-normal motion, whereas wall-attached hooks form effective `polymer walls', reorganising the flow into strong counter-rotating rolls and triggering the extreme-enhancement regime. The elasto-buoyant nature of these states is confirmed by perturbation kinetic energy budgets, which show that polymer and buoyancy sustain the states synergistically. The wall-attached hooks enable rapid thermal equilibration but impose a large hydraulic penalty, making them suitable for process streams requiring fast temperature adjustment. Unattached hooks provide a more thermally efficient regime for heat-transport applications. These results highlight the potential of elastic fluids for future heat transfer enhancement technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports direct numerical simulations of two-dimensional viscoelastic Poiseuille flow with thermal stratification at Re ≲ 1000. It identifies two linearly unstable modes: an elasticity-induced centre mode that saturates into an 'arrowhead' state with negligible heat-transfer enhancement (≈0.03% over the conductive state) and a buoyancy-driven convective mode whose heat flux can be increased by up to 1100% through the formation of hook-like polymer-stress structures. Wall-attached hooks reorganize the flow into strong counter-rotating rolls while unattached hooks act as speed bumps; both regimes are sustained synergistically by polymer work and buoyancy, as shown by perturbation kinetic-energy budgets. The work distinguishes thermally efficient (unattached) from rapid-equilibration (attached) regimes and highlights potential engineering applications.

Significance. If the reported 2D mechanisms are robust, the work establishes a clear route to substantial heat-transfer enhancement via polymer additives in sheared convection, with the 1100% figure and the elasto-buoyant budgets providing quantitative, mechanistic support. The explicit separation of centre-mode versus convective-mode responses and the identification of hook structures constitute a strength of the DNS-plus-budget analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (convective-mode states): the 1100% heat-flux enhancement is stated without an explicit baseline (Newtonian convective state at identical Re, or conductive state) or the precise (Re, Wi, β) combination at which the maximum occurs; because this number is the headline quantitative claim, the parameter values and baseline definition must be stated unambiguously.
  2. [§5] §5 (perturbation kinetic-energy budgets): the budgets are used to assert synergistic elasto-buoyant sustenance, yet the text does not report the time-averaged fractional contributions of the polymer-stress work term versus the buoyancy term for the attached-hook versus unattached-hook regimes; without these fractions the synergy claim remains qualitative.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] The abstract and §3 should list the Weissenberg numbers and polymer viscosity ratios at which the 1100% and 0.03% figures are obtained.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the hook-structure visualizations should indicate whether the snapshots are instantaneous or phase-averaged and should include the corresponding Nusselt number.
  3. [Methods] The manuscript should state the constitutive model (Oldroyd-B, FENE-P, etc.) and the value of the polymer viscosity ratio β in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and quantitative support.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (convective-mode states): the 1100% heat-flux enhancement is stated without an explicit baseline (Newtonian convective state at identical Re, or conductive state) or the precise (Re, Wi, β) combination at which the maximum occurs; because this number is the headline quantitative claim, the parameter values and baseline definition must be stated unambiguously.

    Authors: We agree that the baseline and specific parameters must be stated unambiguously for the headline 1100% claim. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly define the enhancement relative to the Newtonian convective state at identical Re and report the precise (Re, Wi, β) values at which the maximum occurs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (perturbation kinetic-energy budgets): the budgets are used to assert synergistic elasto-buoyant sustenance, yet the text does not report the time-averaged fractional contributions of the polymer-stress work term versus the buoyancy term for the attached-hook versus unattached-hook regimes; without these fractions the synergy claim remains qualitative.

    Authors: We accept that reporting the time-averaged fractional contributions would strengthen the quantitative basis for the synergistic elasto-buoyant sustenance. In the revised manuscript we will add these fractions for both the attached-hook and unattached-hook regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of DNS on the governing equations

full rationale

The paper reports heat-transfer enhancement observed in direct numerical simulations of the 2D viscoelastic equations (Oldroyd-B or equivalent constitutive model) at given Re, Wi and polymer viscosity ratio. The 1100% figure and the hook-structure mechanism are computed quantities, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The centre-mode reference is to external prior work (Khalid et al. 2021) and does not form a self-citation chain that reduces the central claim to an input. Kinetic-energy budgets are post-processed from the simulated fields. No step in the reported chain reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard viscoelastic fluid modeling and two-dimensional direct numerical simulation; no new entities are postulated and no parameters are fitted to the heat-transfer results themselves.

free parameters (2)
  • Reynolds number
    Chosen below 1000 to access the target regime
  • Elasticity parameter (Weissenberg number)
    Varied to explore polymer effects
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The polymer solution obeys a standard viscoelastic constitutive equation such as Oldroyd-B
    Implicit in all polymer-additive modeling in the abstract
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional flow captures the essential heat-transfer physics
    The entire study is performed in 2D

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1367 out tokens · 66115 ms · 2026-05-08T05:09:58.136628+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Kerswell, R. R. and Page, J. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    and Chaudhary, I

    Khalid, M. and Chaudhary, I. and Garg, P. and Shankar, V. and Subramanian, G. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Gage, K. S. and Reid, W. H. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1968 , doi =

    work page 1968

  4. [4]

    and Beris, A

    Sureshkumar, R. and Beris, A. N. , title =. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    Howard, L. N. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1962 , doi =

    work page 1962

  6. [6]

    Kelly, R. E. , title =. Advances in Applied Mechanics , editor =. 1994 , doi =

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    , title =

    Chandrasekhar, S. , title =

    work page

  8. [8]

    and Lu, C.-L

    Yao, Z.-Z. and Lu, C.-L. and Zhou, C.-T. and Luo, K. and Yi, H.-L. and Tan, H.-P. , title =. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Burns, K. J. and Vasil, G. M. and Oishi, J. S. and Lecoanet, D. and Brown, B. P. , title =. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    and Page, J

    Dubief, Y. and Page, J. and Kerswell, R. R. and Terrapon, V. E. and Steinberg, V. , title =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    and Legat, V

    Purnode, B. and Legat, V. , title =. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    and Wan, D

    Dong, M. and Wan, D. , title =. 2025 , archiveprefix =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.09635 , url =. 2508.09635 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09635 2025

  13. [13]

    and Page, J

    Beneitez, M. and Page, J. and Kerswell, R. R. , title =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    , title =

    Mudawar, I. , title =. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    and Wang, X

    Zhang, Z. and Wang, X. and Yan, Y. , title =. e-Prime , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    and Tolstorebrov, I

    Konovalov, D. and Tolstorebrov, I. and Eikevik, T. M. and Kobalava, H. and Radchenko, M. and Hafner, A. and Radchenko, A. , title =. Energies , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    and Sadaghiani, A

    Parizad Benam, B. and Sadaghiani, A. K. and Ya. Review on high heat flux flow boiling of refrigerants and water for electronics cooling , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Hirata, S. C. and Alves, L. S. de B. and Delenda, N. and Ouarzazi, M. N. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    and Taylor, D

    Roy, T. and Taylor, D. and Poulikakos, D. , title =. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Schmid, P. J. and Henningson, D. S. , title =. 2001 , doi =

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    , title =

    Nicolas, X. , title =. Intl J. Thermal Sci. , volume =. 2002 , doi =

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    and Steinberg, V

    Groisman, A. and Steinberg, V. , title =. Nature , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Pope, S. B. , title =

    work page

  24. [24]

    and Dubief, Y

    Page, J. and Dubief, Y. and Kerswell, R. R. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    and Wang, Z

    Wu, Z. and Wang, Z. , title =. The Innovation Energy , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Abed, W. M. and Whalley, R. D. and Dennis, D. J. C. and Poole, R. J. , title =. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Whalley, R. D. and Abed, W. M. and Dennis, D. J. C. and Poole, R. J. , title =. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    and Zhang, H

    Li, D.-Y. and Zhang, H. and Cheng, J.-P. and Li, X.-B. and Li, F.-C. and Qian, S. and Joo, S. W. , title =. Microfluid. Nanofluid. , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    and Yao, G

    Yang, H. and Yao, G. and Wen, D. , title =. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    and Castelain, C

    Traore, B. and Castelain, C. and Burghelea, T. , title =. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    and Wang, L

    Garg, H. and Wang, L. , title =. Intl J. Thermofluids , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    and Sasmal, C

    Chauhan, A. and Sasmal, C. , title =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    and Wei, T

    Cai, W. and Wei, T. and Tang, X. and Liu, Y. and Li, B. and Li, F. , title =. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    and Cheng, J.-P

    Wang, Y. and Cheng, J.-P. and Zhang, H.-N. and Zheng, X. and Cai, W.-H. and Siginer, D. A. , title =. Phys. Fluids , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    and Zhang, C

    Xu, C. and Zhang, C. and Brandt, L. and Song, J. and Shishkina, O. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Sharma, C. S. and Tiwari, M. K. and Zimmermann, S. and Brunschwiler, T. and Schlottig, G. and Michel, B. and Poulikakos, D. , title =. Appl. Energy , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    and Sheikholeslami, M

    Khalili, Z. and Sheikholeslami, M. and Momayez, L. , title =. Sci. Rep. , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    , title =

    Watanabe, T. , title =. Phys. Fluids , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    and Abid, C

    Taher, R. and Abid, C. , title =. Heat Mass Transfer , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    and Ahmed, M

    Taher, R. and Ahmed, M. M. and Haddad, Z. and Abid, C. , title =. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    and Huang, Y

    Zhang, L. and Huang, Y. and Peng, L. and Li, Y.-R. , title =. Case Stud. Thermal Engng , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    and Zhang, L

    Zhu, Y.-Z. and Zhang, L. and Wu, C.-M. and Li, Y.-R. , title =. Appl. Thermal Engng , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    and Wu, B

    Yan, R. and Wu, B. and Gao, C. and Li, Y. , title =. Phys. Plasmas , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    and Gao, C

    Yan, R. and Gao, C. and Zheng, Y. and Wu, B. and Zheng, H. and Ding, T. , title =. Intl Commun. Heat Mass Transfer , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    and Lu, C

    Yao, Z. and Lu, C. and Zhang, M. and Luo, K. and Yi, H. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    and Patne, R

    Kamboj, A. and Patne, R. and Narayana, P. A. L. and Sahu, K. C. , title =. Chem. Engng Sci. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    and Lashgari, I

    Zhang, M. and Lashgari, I. and Zaki, T. A. and Brandt, L. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    and Terrapon, V

    Dubief, Y. and Terrapon, V. E. and Hof, B. , title =. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    , title =

    Steinberg, V. , title =. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Miles, J. W. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1961 , doi =

    work page 1961

  51. [51]

    Howard, L. N. , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =. 1961 , doi =

    work page 1961

  52. [52]

    Lewy, T. A. and Kerswell, R. R. , title =. 2025 , archiveprefix =. 2509.26168 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    and Vadher, J

    Maradiya, C. and Vadher, J. and Agarwal, R. , title =. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Manglik, R. M. , title =. Heat Transfer Handbook , publisher =

    work page

  55. [55]

    and Javed, M

    Ali, N. and Javed, M. A. , title =. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    and Shah, R

    Khan, Z. and Shah, R. A. and Islam, S. and Jan, H. and Jan, B. and Rasheed, H.-U. and Khan, A. , title =. Coatings , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    and Kerswell, R

    Lin, Y. and Kerswell, R. R. , title =. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    and Fujinuma, H

    Takahashi, M. and Fujinuma, H. and Tsukuii, J. and Inoue, A. , title =. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    and Terrapon, V

    Dubief, Y. and Terrapon, V. E. , title =. Phys. Fluids , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020