pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06753 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Measurement of the Absolute Branching Fraction of Xi(1530)⁻ to (Xi pi)⁻ and Updated Measurement of the Branching Fraction of psi(3686) to anti-Xi⁺ Xi(1530)⁻ + c.c

BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim , M. N. Achasov , P. Adlarson , X. C. Ai , C. S. Akondi , R. Aliberti , A. Amoroso , Q. An
show 752 more authors
Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H.-R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. H\"usken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kr\"oger L. Kr\"ummel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. K\"uhn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. Mackay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. P\"opping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J.-P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords branching fractionXi(1530)hyperon decaysisospin symmetryabsolute measurementbaryon resonancepsi(3686) decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Xi(1530) baryon decays to Xi pi final states with an absolute branching fraction of 91.1 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the first absolute branching fractions for the decays of the Xi(1530)^- resonance into Xi^0 pi^- and Xi^- pi^0. Using a large sample of psi(3686) decays, the analysis finds individual branching fractions of 61.4 percent and 29.7 percent respectively, with the combined value at 91.1 percent after accounting for correlations from isospin symmetry. It also provides an updated value for the branching fraction of the psi(3686) to anti-Xi^+ Xi(1530)^- plus charge conjugate. These measurements matter because they provide precise normalization for studies of hyperon decays and test the validity of isospin conservation in strong interactions. A sympathetic reader cares as this quantifies how dominant the two-body decay mode is for this excited state.

Core claim

The central claim is that the absolute branching fraction B(Xi(1530)^- to (Xi pi)^-) equals 91.1 percent with statistical and systematic uncertainties of 6.7 and 6.8 percent, derived from joint treatment of the two isospin-related modes in the decay chain from psi(3686), while the branching fraction of psi(3686) to anti-Xi^+ Xi(1530)^- + c.c. is updated to 8.67 times 10 to the minus 6 with three uncertainties.

What carries the argument

The joint analysis of the two decay modes Xi(1530)^- to Xi^0 pi^- and Xi(1530)^- to Xi^- pi^0 under the assumption of isospin symmetry, which allows treating them as fully correlated to extract the absolute branching fractions from the observed yields.

If this is right

  • The Xi(1530) resonance decays predominantly via the Xi pi channel, accounting for over 90 percent of its width.
  • The production branching fraction of Xi(1530) in psi(3686) decays is determined with a total uncertainty of about 11 percent.
  • Other possible decay modes of the Xi(1530), such as radiative or three-body decays, are limited to less than 10 percent combined.
  • The ratio of the two observed modes is consistent with the 2:1 expectation from isospin symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These absolute values can be used by other experiments to calibrate their detection efficiencies for similar hyperon decays without relying on relative measurements.
  • Confirmation at higher precision could reveal small isospin breaking effects if the ratio deviates from theoretical predictions.
  • Models of baryon spectroscopy can now be tested against these measured fractions to refine predictions for the Xi(1530) width and coupling constants.

Load-bearing premise

The two decay modes are treated as fully correlated under the assumption of isospin symmetry.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of the branching fractions in a different production process that finds a combined value for the two modes significantly below 80 percent or above 100 percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06753 by A. Amoroso, A. A. Zafar, A. Bortone, A. Brueggemann, A. Calcaterra, A. Dbeyssi, A. Denig, A. Gilman, A. Guskov, A. Khoukaz, A. Kupsc, A. Limphirat, A. Marshall, A. N. Zhu, A. Pathak, A. Q. Guo, A. Rivetti, A. Sarantsev, A. Zhemchugov, B. A. Shi, B. C. Ke, BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim, B. H. Xiang, Bin Wang, B. J. Liu, B. Kopf, B. L. Zhang, B. Moses, B. M. Zheng, Bo Wang, B. Wang, B. X. Liu, B. X. Yu, B. X. Zhang, B. Zheng, B. Zhong, C. C. Lin, C. D. Fu, C. F. Qiao, C. F. Redmer, C. Geng, Chao Chen, Chao Wang, C. H. Chen, C. Herold, C. H. Heinz, C. H. Li, Ch. Rosner, Chunkai Li, Ch. Y. Shi, C. J. Tang, C. J. Xu, C. K. Li, C. Li, C. Liang, C. Liu, C. L. Luo, C. Normand, Cong Li, Cong Wang, C. P. Shen, C. Q. Deng, C. Q. Feng, C. S. Akondi, C. Wang, C. Xie, C. X. Lin, C. X. Liu, C. X. Yu, C. X. Yue, C. Y. Guan, C. Z. He, C. Zhong, C. Z. Yuan, D. Bettoni, D. B. Xiong, D. Cabiati, D. Dedovich, D. H. Wei, D. H. Zhang, D. Jiang, D. J. Wei, D. M. Li, D. Wei, D. Xiao, D. X. Lin, D. Y. Wang, E. Bianco, E. Di Fiore, E. M. Gersabeck, E. van der Smagt, F. A. Harris, F. Bianchi, F. C. Ma, F. Cossio, F. De Mori, F. E. Maas, Feng Liu, F. Feldbauer, F. Hanisch, F. H. Heinsius, F. H. Liu, F. Li, F. Liu, F. M. Melendi, F. Nerling, F. Rosini, F. R. Zeng, F. Stieler, F. Weidner, F. Yan, F. Z. Qi, G. B. Sun, G. Chen, G. Cibinetto, Gengyuan Zhang, G. F. Cao, G. Felici, G. F. Fan, G. F. Xu, G. Li, G. L. Peng, G. Mezzadri, G. M. Liu, G. R. Che, G. R. Liao, G. Rong, G. S. Huang, G. Wilkinson, G. X. Sun, G. Y. Hou, G. Y. Tang, G. Yu, G. Y. Xiao, G. Y. Zhang, G. Zhao, Han Zhang, H. B. Jiang, H. B. Li, H. B. Liu, H. Cai, H. C. Zhang, Heng Ma, H. F. Shen, H. Gao, H. Guo, H. H. Zhang, H. J. Li, H. J. Lu, H. J. Wang, H. J. Yang, H. K. Sun, H. L. Dai, H. Liang, H. Liu, H. L. Li, H. L. Ma, H. L. Song, H. L. Xia, H. L. Yang, H. M. Hu, H. Miao, H. M. Liu, H. Neuwirth, H. N. Li, H. P. Li, H. P. Peng, H. Q. Zhang, H.-R. Bao, H. R. Qi, H. R. Wang, H. R. Wei, H. R. Wen, H. R. Zhang, H. S. Chen, H. Shi, H. Sun, H. Tabaharizato, Huihui Liu, Hui Li, H. Xiao, H. X. Mao, H. X. Yang, H. Y. Chen, H. Yuan, H. Y. Xu, H. Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, I. Boyko, I. Denisenko, I. Garzia, I. Mackay, I. Uman, J. B. Gong, J. B. Jiao, J. B. Liu, J. Cheng, J. Cottee-Meldrum, J. D. Gong, J. Dong, J. Fang, J. F. Chang, J. F. Hu, J. F. Qiu, J. F. Shangguan, J. F. Sun, J. F. Wu, J. G. Lu, J. Gollub, J. Gutierrez, J. H. Feng, J. H. Qiao, J. H. Yang, J. H. Zou, Jianyu Zhang, Jie Yuan, Jin Fang, Jin Zhang, Jiyuan Zhang, J. Jackson, J. J. Fan, J. J. Liu, J. J. Qin, J. J. Song, J. J. Tang, J. J. Wang, J. J. Zhang, J. K. Jiao, J. L. Fu, J. Libby, J. L. Ma, J. L. Ping, J. L. Qin, J. L. Shi, J. L. Zhang, J. Muskalla, J. N. Guo, J. N. Li, J. P. Dai, J. P. Wang, J.-P. Zhao, J. P. Zheng, J. Q. Zhang, J. Q. Zhou, J. Rademacker, J. R. Luo, J. S. Li, J. S. Luo, J. S. Yu, J. S. Zhang, J. Tang, Junhao Yin, J. Wang, J. W. Li, J. W. Zhang, J. X. Teng, J. X. Zhang, J. Y. Han, J. Y. Shi, J. Y. Tian, J. Yuan, J. Y. Zhang, J. Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, J. Zhu, J. Zu, J. Z. Zhang, J. Z. Zhao, K. Begzsuren, K. D. Hao, Ke Liu, K. Goetzen, K. J. Xie, K. J. Zhu, K. K. He, K. L. He, K. Li, K. Liu, K. L. Li, K. Peters, K. Petridis, K. Schoenning, K. Sun, K. S. Zhu, Kun Liu, K. Wang, K. X. Huang, K. Y. Liu, K. Zhu, L. B. Guo, L. B. Liao, L. C. Liu, L. C. L. Jin, Lei Li, Lei Zhang, Lei Zhao, L. Fava, L. Feng, L. F. Tang, L. Ge, L. Gong, L. G. Shao, L. H. Wu, Lianjie Wu, Lin Zhu, L. J. Li, L. J. Wu, L. K. Jia, L. Kr\"oger, L. Kr\"ummel, L. Liu, L. L. Ma, L. L. Wang, L. M. Zhang, L. N. Cheng, L. P\"opping, L. Q. Huang, L. Q. Qin, L. R. Ma, L. Sun, Lu Liu, L. W. Wang, L. W. Yu, L. Xia, L. X. Zhu, L. Yan, L. Y. Dong, L. Y. Qin, L. Y. Tao, L. Yuan, L. Zhao, M. Barbagiovanni, M. B. Bertani, M. Berlowski, M. C. Du, M. Destefanis, M. D. Gu, M. Fritsch, M. Greco, M. G. Zhao, M. H. Cai, M. H. Gu, M. H. Li, M. H. Liao, M. H. Liu, M. H. Shi, M. H. Song, M. H. Ye, Mi Wang, M. J. Guo, M. Kuessner, M. K. Yuan, M. L. Chen, M. Lellmann, M. Maggiora, M. N. Achasov, M. Pelizaeus, M. Qi, M. Q. Jing, M. Q. Ruan, M. R. Li, M. Rolo, M. Schernau, M. Scodeggio, M. Shao, M. Stolte, M. Tat, M. T. Li, M. Wang, M. Wolke, M. X. Luo, M. Y. Dong, M. Ye, M. Zhuge, N. Berger, N. Cao, N. H\"usken, N. in der Wiesche, N. Kumar, N. Salone, N. Yu. Muchnoi, N. Y. Wang, N. Zhang, O. Bakina, O. B. Kolcu, P. Adlarson, P. B. Qin, P. C. Hong, P. Egorov, P. Huang, P. L. Li, P. L. Liu, P. R. Li, P. T. Ge, P. Zhang, Q. A. Malik, Q. An, Q. Ji, Q. J. Xu, Q. Lan, Q. Liu, Q. L. Niu, Q. M. Li, Q. M. Ma, Q. N. Xu, Q. Ouyang, Q. P. Hu, Q. P. Ji, Q. X. Feng, Q. X. Li, Q. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Q. Z. Zhang, R. A. Briere, R. Aliberti, R. E. de Boer, R. E. Mitchell, R. G. Ping, R. J. Yang, R. Li, R. P. Guo, R. P. Zhao, R. Q. Ma, R. Sun, R. Y. Ma, R. Y. Zhang, S. A. Cetin, S. B. Liu, S. Garbolino, S. Gramigna, S. G. Wu, Shanshan Li, Shaoxu Du, Shulei Zhang, Shun Wang, S. H. Yuan, S. H. Zeng, S. H. Zhang, S. H. Zhu, S. J. Chen, S. Jin, S. J. Jiang, S. J. Zhao, S. Kabana, S. K. Choi, S. L. Hu, S. Li, S. L. Olsen, S. Maity, S. Malde, S. Marcello, S. M. Chen, S. M. Wu, S. Nisar, S. N. Zhang, S. Pacetti, S. Plura, S. P. Wen, S. Qian, S. S. Fang, S. Sosio, S. Spataro, S. S. Rong, S. S Su, S. S. Sun, S. Stansilaus, S. Wang, S. X. Du, S. X. Li, S. Y. Li, S. Y. Shi, S. Zhou, T. Chen, T. D. Xu, T. Hu, T. Hussain, T. J. Min, T. Johansson, T. J. Wang, T. J. Zhu, T. Lenz, T. Li, T. Lin, T. Liu, T. Luo, T. Ma, T. Sun, T. T. Chang, T. T. Han, T. T. Lei, T. Wang, T. Y. Li, T. Yu, T. Y. Xing, T. Z. Song, U. Wiedner, V. Batozskaya, V. Khachatryan, V. Prasad, W. B. Qian, W. B. Yan, W. Chen, W. C. Yan, W. D. Li, W. D. Niu, W. D. Zhu, W. G. Li, W. Gradl, W. H. Shen, W. H. Tian, W. H. Yan, W. Ji, W. J. Zheng, W. J. Zhu, W. K\"uhn, W. M. Liu, W. M. Song, W. N. Lan, W. P. Wang, W. P. Yan, W. Q. Zheng, W. Shan, W. T. Liu, W. Wang, W. X. Fang, W. X. Gong, W. Y. Sun, W. Z. Zhu, X. B. Ji, X. Cai, X. C. Ai, X. C. Dai, X. Chu, X. C. Lou, X. Dong, X. D. Yu, X. F. Wang, X. Guo, X. Han, X. H. Li, X. H. Mo, Xin Wang, X. J. Peng, X. K. Li, X. K. Liu, X. Kui, X. K. Zhou, X. L. Bao, X. L. Du, X. Li, X. Liu, X. L. Ji, X. L. Kang, X. L. Li, X. L. Liu, X. L. Lu, X. L. Luo, X. L. Wang, X. M. Jing, X. M. Zhang, X. N. Wang, X. Pan, X. P. Liu, X. P. Qin, X. P. Xu, X. Q. Hao, X. Q. Jia, X. Q. Yan, X. R. Chen, X. R. Lyu, X. R. Zheng, X. R. Zhou, X. Shi, X. S. Jiang, X. S. Kang, X. S. Qin, X. T. Chen, X. T. Hou, X. T. Huang, X. T. Ma, X. W. Wu, X. X. Ding, X. Y. Chai, X. Y. Chen, X. Y. Li, X. Y. Liu, X. Y. Ma, X. Y. Shan, X. Y. Shen, X. Y. Yang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Zhou, X. Y. Zhuang, X. Zeng, X. Zhou, X. Z. Li, Yanning Wang, Yaqian Wang, Y. A. Tang, Y. Bai, Y. B. Chen, Y. B. Liu, Y. B. Zhao, Y. C. Sun, Y. C. Xu, Y. C. Yu, Y. C. Zhai, Y. C. Zhu, Y. Ding, Y. D. Wang, Y. F. Liang, Y. F. Lyu, Y. F. Wang, Y. Gao, Y. G. Li, Y. G. Xie, Y. H. An, Y. H. Fan, Y. H. Lu, Y. H. Lyu, Y. H. Meng, Y. H. Sun, Y. Hu, Y. H. Wang, Y. H. Xie, Y. H. Yang, Y. H. Zhan, Y. H. Zhang, Y. H. Zheng, Yi. Ding, Yi Liu, Ying Yue, Yi Wang, Y. Jiang, Y. Jin, Y. J. Mao, Y. J. Sun, Y. J. Wang, Y. J. Zeng, Y. K. Heng, Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Lu, Y. L. Wang, Y. L. Xiao, Y. L. Zhao, Y. M. Ma, Y. M. Yang, Y. Nefedov, Y. N. Gao, Y. Niu, Y. N. Wang, Yongchao Yu, Youhua Yang, Y. Pan, Y. P. Guo, Y. P. Huang, Y. P. Li, Y. P. Liao, Y. P. Lu, Y. P. Pei, Y. P. Zhang, Y. P. Zhao, Y. Q. Chen, Y. Q. Du, Y. Q. Fang, Y. Q. Yang, Y. R. Hou, Y. Schelhaas, Y. S. Huang, Y. T. Feng, Y. Tian, Y. T. Liang, Y. T. Zhang, Yuan Wang, Yujie Zeng, Yunong Gao, Yu Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. W. Fu, Y. X. Ding, Y. X. Hu, Y. Xie, Y. X. Song, Y. Xu, Y. X. Zhao, Y. X. Zhou, Y. Yang, Y. Y. Duan, Y. Y. Gao, Y. Y. Ji, Y. Y. Kuang, Y. Y. Peng, Y. Yuan, Y. Y. Yan, Y. Z. Che, Y. Zhang, Y. Z. Sun, Y. Z. Yang, Y. Z. Zhou, Z. A. Liu, Z. A. Zhu, Z. D. Liu, Z. D. Zhang, Z. F. Tian, Z. Gao, Z. Guo, Z. G. Zhao, Z. H. Duan, Zhilong Zhang, Zhi Wang, Z. H. Li, Z. H. Lu, Z. H. Qin, Z. H. Qu, Z. H. Tang, Z. H. Zhang, Zh. Zh. Zhang, Zirong Song, Ziyang Zhang, Ziyi Wang, Ziyu Zhang, Z. Jiao, Z. J. Li, Z. J. Shang, Z. J. Xiao, Z. J. Ye, Z. K. Chen, Z. L. Hou, Z. L. Li, Z. L. Liu, Z. L. Wang, Z. L. Zhang, Z. M. Hu, Z. Ning, Z. P. Mao, Z. P. Xie, Z. P. Yao, Z. Q. Liu, Z. Q. Sun, Z. Q. Wang, Z. S. Xu, Z. T. Sun, Z. Wang, Z. W. Ge, Z. Wu, Z. X. Li, Z. X. Liu, Z. X. Meng, Z. X. Zhang, Z. Y. Deng, Z. Y. Li, Z. Y. Liu, Z. Y. Lv, Z. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Yang, Z. Y. You, Z. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fit to the Mrecoil Ξ¯+ distribution of the ST Ξ¯+ can￾didates. Data are shown as dots with error bars. The solid red and blue curves are the total fit and the background con￾tribution, respectively. The dashed red curve is the fitted Ξ(1530)− signal. The shaded histogram represents the back￾ground shape of the inclusive MC sample. continuum process by Ncon. = σc·L3.686·ϵcon. ·B(Ξ¯+ → Λ¯π +)·B(Λ¯ → pπ¯ +), … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The 2-D distributions of MΞ0 versus MΞ(1530)− (left) and MΞ− versus MΞ(1530)− (right) from data. extracted directly from the exclusive MC sample of Ξ(1530)− → Ξ −π 0 . Based on the isospin relation and phase space factors, the ratio r ≡ B(Ξ(1530)−→Ξ 0π −) B(Ξ(1530)−→Ξ−π0) is set to 2.06. Combining the relationship among yields of signal events, detection efficiencies, and BFs, Nbkg3 is related to NΞ0π− in … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Projections of simultaneous fit result for data. The top row shows the projections for Ξ(1530) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Based on (2712.4+-14.3)*10^{6} psi(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{0} pi^{-} and Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{-} pi^{0} are investigated jointly via the process psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c. Under the assumption of isospin symmetry, the two decay modes are treated as fully correlated, and we report the first measurement of their absolute branching fractions. The results are B(Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{0} pi^{-})=(61.4+-4.5+-4.6)% and B(Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{-} pi^{0}) =(29.7+-2.2+-2.2)%. The combined branching fraction of the two decays is B(Xi(1530)^{-} to (Xi pi)^{-})=(91.1+-6.7+-6.8)%, with uncertainties accounting for the correlations between the two modes. Here, the first uncertainties are statistical, while the second are systematic. Additionally, we update the branching fraction of the decay psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c. The updated measurement is B(psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c.)=(8.67+-0.52+-0.58+-0.57)*10^{-6}, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic related to event selection and the fit model, and the third is associated with the interference effect.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a joint analysis of the decays Ξ(1530)^− → Ξ^0 π^− and Ξ(1530)^− → Ξ^− π^0 using (2712.4 ± 14.3) × 10^6 ψ(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector via the process ψ(3686) → Ξ-bar^+ Ξ(1530)^− + c.c. Under the assumption of isospin symmetry, the two modes are treated as fully correlated when propagating uncertainties. The paper claims the first absolute branching fraction measurements: B(Ξ(1530)^− → Ξ^0 π^−) = (61.4 ± 4.5 ± 4.6)% and B(Ξ(1530)^− → Ξ^− π^0) = (29.7 ± 2.2 ± 2.2)%, yielding a combined B(Ξ(1530)^− → (Ξ π)^−) = (91.1 ± 6.7 ± 6.8)%. It also updates B(ψ(3686) → Ξ-bar^+ Ξ(1530)^− + c.c.) = (8.67 ± 0.52 ± 0.58 ± 0.57) × 10^{-6}.

Significance. If the results hold after addressing the correlation treatment, this constitutes the first absolute branching fraction measurements for these Ξ(1530) decays, providing valuable inputs for testing isospin symmetry in hyperon decays and for normalizing other analyses involving Ξ(1530) resonances. The large data sample and joint fit approach are strengths, as is the explicit separation of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the reported values.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and uncertainty propagation section] Abstract and uncertainty propagation section: The combined branching fraction of (91.1 ± 6.7 ± 6.8)% treats the two decay modes as fully correlated (correlation coefficient = 1) under the isospin symmetry assumption. This is load-bearing for the quoted total uncertainty because the modes share the common ψ(3686) production branching fraction, total event count, and reconstruction efficiencies in the joint analysis. The observed ratio 61.4/29.7 ≈ 2.07 is close to the Clebsch-Gordan expectation of 2, but the manuscript does not quantify the impact of possible isospin-breaking effects (e.g., electromagnetic corrections or phase-space differences) on the combined central value and uncertainty.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results section should explicitly state the number of observed signal events and the fit quality (e.g., χ²/dof) for each decay mode to allow direct assessment of the statistical component.
  2. [Results section] Clarify in the text whether the third uncertainty on the updated ψ(3686) branching fraction (the interference effect) is treated as fully correlated or independent between the two Ξ(1530) modes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The single major comment is addressed point by point below, and we outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and uncertainty propagation section] Abstract and uncertainty propagation section: The combined branching fraction of (91.1 ± 6.7 ± 6.8)% treats the two decay modes as fully correlated (correlation coefficient = 1) under the isospin symmetry assumption. This is load-bearing for the quoted total uncertainty because the modes share the common ψ(3686) production branching fraction, total event count, and reconstruction efficiencies in the joint analysis. The observed ratio 61.4/29.7 ≈ 2.07 is close to the Clebsch-Gordan expectation of 2, but the manuscript does not quantify the impact of possible isospin-breaking effects (e.g., electromagnetic corrections or phase-space differences) on the combined central value and uncertainty.

    Authors: We agree that the full-correlation assumption is central to the quoted combined uncertainty and that the manuscript does not explicitly quantify possible isospin-breaking contributions. The choice of correlation coefficient = 1 follows directly from the joint fit: the two modes share the identical data sample of (2712.4 ± 14.3) × 10^6 ψ(3686) events, the same ψ(3686) → Ξ-bar+ Ξ(1530)− + c.c. branching fraction, and the dominant systematic uncertainties arising from event selection and reconstruction efficiencies. The measured ratio 61.4/29.7 ≈ 2.07 is statistically consistent with the Clebsch-Gordan value of 2, which supports the isospin-symmetry premise at the present precision. Phase-space differences between the two modes are negligible given the small mass splitting, and electromagnetic corrections in hyperon decays are known from the literature to be at the sub-percent level. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in the uncertainty-propagation section that states these considerations explicitly and notes that any residual isospin-breaking effects lie well below the current total uncertainty, thereby leaving the combined central value and error unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental extraction from data counts and efficiencies

full rationale

The paper reports absolute branching fractions extracted from observed event yields in psi(3686) data, corrected by reconstruction efficiencies and normalized to the total number of psi(3686) events. The isospin symmetry assumption is invoked only to set the correlation coefficient to 1 for the combined uncertainty on the two decay modes; it is a standard external physical hypothesis, not a self-definition or fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No equations reduce the reported B values to prior fitted quantities by construction, and no self-citation chain supplies the central results. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks (data counts, MC efficiencies).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the collected experimental dataset and the domain assumption of isospin symmetry used to correlate the two decay modes. No additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond standard efficiency corrections implicit in any branching fraction analysis.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption isospin symmetry
    The two decay modes Xi(1530)^- to Xi^0 pi^- and Xi^- pi^0 are treated as fully correlated under this assumption.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 9770 in / 1426 out tokens · 98504 ms · 2026-05-11T00:45:59.067046+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. R. Farrar and D. R. Jackson, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1416 (1975)

    1975

  2. [2]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 072003 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 092012 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 051101(R) (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    D. M. Asneret al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24, 499 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    K¨ opke and N

    L. K¨ opke and N. Wermes, Phys. Rept.174, 67 (1989); H. Kowalski and T. F. Walsh, Phys. Rev. D14, 852 (1976)

    1989

  7. [7]

    J. W. Priceet al.(CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 71, 058201 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar Collaboration), Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 034008 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    Sumihamaet al.(Belle Collaboration), Phys

    M. Sumihamaet al.(Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 072501 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    P. E. Schlein, D. D. Carmony, G. M. Pjerrou, W. E. Slater, D. H. Stork, and H. K. Ticho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 167 (1963)

    1963

  11. [11]

    Button-Shafer, J

    J. Button-Shafer, J. S. Lindsey, J. J. Murray, and G. A. Smith, Phys. Rev.142, 883 (1966)

    1966

  12. [12]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Chin

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 48, 093001 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Nucl

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A614, 345 (2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    C. H. Yuet al.,Proceedings of IPAC(2016), 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2016-TUYA01

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2016-tuya01 2016

  16. [16]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Chin

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 44, 040001 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    J. Lu, Y. Xiao, and X. Ji, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Meth- ods4, 337 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Zhanget al., Radiat

    J. Zhanget al., Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods6, 289 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Liet al., Radiat

    X. Liet al., Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1, 13 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    Y. X. Guo, S. S. Sen, F. F. An, Y. R. Xing, Z. Ming, Z. Wu, H. L. Dai, H. Y. Kun, L. Cheng, Z. Y. Deng, H. M. Liu, and L. W. Guo, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 12 1, 15 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Caoet al., Nucl

    P. Caoet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A953, 163053 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Agostinelliet al.(GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl

    S. Agostinelliet al.(GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A506, 250 (2003)

    2003

  23. [23]

    Jadach, B

    S. Jadach, B. Ward, and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.130, 260 (2000)

    2000

  24. [24]

    Jadach, B

    S. Jadach, B. Ward, and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D63, 113009 (2001)

    2001

  25. [25]

    D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C32, 599 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang, and Y. S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D62, 034003 (2000)

    2000

  28. [28]

    R. L. Yang, R. G. Ping, and H. Chen, Chin. Phys. Lett. 31, 061301 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Richter-Was, Phys

    E. Richter-Was, Phys. Lett. B303, 163 (1993)

    1993

  30. [30]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101801 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, L031106 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    X. Y. Zhou, S. X. Du, G. Li, and C. P. Shen, Comput. Phys. Commun.258, 107540 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Ablikimet al

    M. Ablikimet al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 37, 123001 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Ablikimet al

    M. Ablikimet al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 072017 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Chatrchyanet al

    S. Chatrchyanet al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 092007 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Albrechtet al

    H. Albrechtet al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B241, 278 (1990)

    1990

  37. [37]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 052005 (2010)

    2010

  38. [38]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 012002 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Barlow, Nucl

    R. Barlow, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 297, 496 (1990)

    1990

  40. [40]

    Y. P. Guo and C. Z. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D105, 114001 (2022)

    2022