pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07576 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

On structure-preserving and pointwise conservative continuous DG schemes for hyperbolic systems

R\'emi Abgrall , Michael Dumbser , Pierre-Henri Maire , Enrico Zampa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords continuous-discontinuous Galerkinstructure-preserving schemespointwise conservationhyperbolic systemsvector calculus identitiesenergy conservationfinite element methodsunstructured meshes
0
0 comments X

The pith

New CG-DG schemes for hyperbolic systems achieve pointwise conservation and exact vector identities by pairing discontinuous and continuous polynomial spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces semi-discrete continuous-discontinuous Galerkin schemes for linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems on unstructured simplex meshes. The solution is approximated in the standard discontinuous piecewise polynomial space of degree N while the flux is computed in a compatible continuous piecewise polynomial space of degree N+1. This dual-space construction produces schemes that remain conservative on arbitrary control volumes rather than only on mesh cells. The same construction automatically enforces the vector calculus identities div curl equals zero and curl grad equals zero at every point in the discrete solution. For linear symmetric systems the approach also delivers exact conservation of the square energy, yielding L2 stability.

Core claim

The new CG-DG schemes are not only cellwise conservative, but also locally pointwise conservative everywhere, hence they satisfy the integral form of the conservation law on arbitrary control volumes that do not have to coincide with the mesh at all; the new methods naturally satisfy the two basic vector calculus identities ∇ · ∇ × A and ∇ × ∇ Z exactly pointwise locally and globally everywhere on the discrete level; for linear symmetric hyperbolic systems the schemes are naturally energy conservative for the square energy.

What carries the argument

The use of two different but compatible approximation spaces: the classical DG space of discontinuous piecewise polynomials of degree up to N for the discrete solution and a classical finite element space of globally continuous piecewise polynomials of degree N+1 for the discrete flux field.

If this is right

  • The integral conservation law holds on any sub-volume chosen independently of the mesh cells.
  • The identities div curl A equals zero and curl grad Z equals zero are satisfied at every point of the discrete solution.
  • Linear symmetric hyperbolic systems conserve the L2 norm of the solution exactly.
  • For polynomial degree zero the method recovers cell-centered finite-volume schemes that use vertex-based fluxes.
  • All three properties are satisfied simultaneously for the linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems tested in the paper.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same space-compatibility idea could be applied to other structure-preserving problems that require exact preservation of differential identities on unstructured grids.
  • Pointwise conservation on arbitrary volumes may simplify coupling of the scheme to Lagrangian or moving-mesh descriptions without remeshing.
  • Because the flux is continuous, post-processing for visualization or flux-based diagnostics becomes straightforward without additional averaging steps.
  • The energy stability result for linear cases suggests the nonlinear extensions may remain stable for long integration times when the underlying continuous problem is stable.

Load-bearing premise

The discontinuous solution space and continuous flux space must be chosen so that their compatibility forces the flux divergence to match the solution time derivative exactly at every point.

What would settle it

A single mesh cell computation in which the pointwise residual between the time derivative of the discrete solution and the divergence of the computed flux remains nonzero at an interior evaluation point.

read the original abstract

We present a new class of structure-preserving semi-discrete continuous-discontinuous Galerkin (CG-DG) finite element schemes for linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems of partial differential equations on unstructured simplex meshes that automatically satisfy the following properties: i) the new schemes are not only cellwise conservative, but also locally pointwise conservative everywhere, hence they satisfy the integral form of the conservation law on arbitrary control volumes that do not have to coincide with the mesh at all; ii) the new methods naturally satisfy the two basic vector calculus identities $\nabla \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf{A}$ and $\nabla \times \nabla Z$ exactly pointwise locally and globally everywhere on the discrete level; iii) for linear symmetric hyperbolic systems the schemes are naturally energy conservative for the square energy, i.e. nonlinearly stable in the $L^2$ norm. The key ingredient of the new CG-DG schemes is the use of two different but compatible approximation spaces: the classical DG space $\mathcal{U}_h^N$ of discontinuous piecewise polynomials of degree up to $N$ and a classical finite element space $\mathcal{W}_h^{N+1}$ of globally continuous piecewise polynomials of degree $N+1$. In the new CG-DG schemes, the discrete solution $\mathbf{u}_h$ is sought in $\mathcal{U}_h^N$, while a suitable discrete flux field $\tilde{\mathbf{f}}_h$ is computed in $\mathcal{W}_h^{N+1}$. For $N=0$ our new schemes are directly related to cell-centered finite volume schemes with suitable vertex-based fluxes. All claimed properties of the schemes are first mathematically proven and are then also verified via suitable numerical tests. We show applications of our approach to three linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new class of structure-preserving semi-discrete continuous-discontinuous Galerkin (CG-DG) finite element schemes for linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems. Using a discontinuous piecewise polynomial space of degree N for the solution and a continuous piecewise polynomial space of degree N+1 for the flux, the schemes are shown to be locally pointwise conservative on arbitrary control volumes, to satisfy the div-curl identities exactly, and to be energy conservative in the L2 norm for linear symmetric systems. These properties are mathematically proven and verified numerically on three test cases.

Significance. If the mathematical proofs hold as claimed, this work offers a significant contribution to the development of structure-preserving discretizations for hyperbolic PDEs. The ability to satisfy conservation laws on volumes not aligned with the mesh, combined with exact discrete preservation of fundamental vector calculus identities and parameter-free energy stability, addresses important limitations in existing methods. The approach bridges DG and continuous FE methods in a novel way and may find applications in computational fluid dynamics and electromagnetics where strict conservation is required.

major comments (2)
  1. [Approximation spaces and scheme definition] The inclusion div(W_h^{N+1}) ⊆ U_h^N is the cornerstone of the exact pointwise conservation; this property must be rigorously established with a proof, including the precise polynomial degrees and mesh assumptions (simplex meshes).
  2. [Proof of conservation on arbitrary volumes] The transition from the semi-discrete equation to the integral form on arbitrary subdomains via the divergence theorem assumes global continuity of the flux; the manuscript should explicitly show that no additional interface terms arise for control volumes crossing element boundaries.
minor comments (3)
  1. The title uses 'continuous DG schemes' which might be confusing; consider clarifying the hybrid nature in the title or abstract.
  2. Numerical results section: provide quantitative measures of the conservation errors (e.g., maximum deviation from machine precision) to support the 'exact' claims.
  3. For N=0 case, the relation to cell-centered finite volume schemes with vertex-based fluxes should be elaborated with a brief comparison or reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and explicit proofs into the revised version to enhance rigor and readability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Approximation spaces and scheme definition] The inclusion div(W_h^{N+1}) ⊆ U_h^N is the cornerstone of the exact pointwise conservation; this property must be rigorously established with a proof, including the precise polynomial degrees and mesh assumptions (simplex meshes).

    Authors: We agree that this inclusion is central and merits a standalone proof. Although the manuscript invokes this property in the conservation proofs, we will add a dedicated lemma (new Lemma 3.1) right after the space definitions. The lemma will state: On a conforming simplicial mesh, the divergence of any function in the continuous space W_h^{N+1} belongs to the discontinuous space U_h^N. The short proof follows from the fact that the divergence operator reduces the polynomial degree by one locally (div(P_{N+1}) ⊆ P_N) and that U_h^N permits discontinuities, so no continuity constraint is violated. Mesh assumptions (conforming triangulation of simplices) will be stated explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Proof of conservation on arbitrary volumes] The transition from the semi-discrete equation to the integral form on arbitrary subdomains via the divergence theorem assumes global continuity of the flux; the manuscript should explicitly show that no additional interface terms arise for control volumes crossing element boundaries.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this detail. Because the flux field is sought in the globally continuous space W_h^{N+1}, it is C^0 everywhere, including across element interfaces. Consequently, when the divergence theorem is applied to an arbitrary control volume that intersects multiple elements, the flux is single-valued and continuous, so the classical divergence theorem holds without jump or interface correction terms. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short paragraph (or remark) immediately after the statement of the semi-discrete scheme, deriving the integral conservation law on arbitrary subdomains and explicitly noting the absence of additional interface contributions due to the continuity of the flux. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper establishes its claims (pointwise conservation on arbitrary volumes, exact discrete div-curl identities, and L2 energy stability) via direct mathematical proofs that rely on the standard mapping property div: W_h^{N+1} → U_h^N together with the continuity of the flux field in the continuous space. These are intrinsic consequences of the chosen compatible finite-element spaces and the divergence theorem; no parameters are fitted to data, no result is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or self-definition. The construction is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the compatibility of the two polynomial spaces, which is a standard domain assumption in finite-element theory rather than a new postulate; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The DG space U_h^N and continuous space W_h^{N+1} are compatible in the sense required to define a suitable discrete flux field that transfers the desired conservation and identity properties.
    Stated as the key ingredient in the abstract; relies on established properties of polynomial spaces on simplices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5636 in / 1381 out tokens · 45395 ms · 2026-05-11T02:21:17.827624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. Abgrall. Essentially non-oscillatory residual distribution schemes for hyperbolic problems. J. Comput. Phys., 214(2):773–808, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    R. Abgrall. A combination of residual distribution and the active flux formulations or a new class of schemes that can combine several writings of the same hyperbolic problem: application to the 1d Euler equations. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. , 5(1):370–402, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Abgrall, W

    R. Abgrall, W. Boscheri, and Y . Liu. Virtual finite element and hyperbolic problems: the PAMPA algorithm. J. Comput. Phys., 546:26, 2026. Id /No 114521

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Abgrall, S

    R. Abgrall, S. Busto, and M. Dumbser. A simple and general framework for the construction of thermodynamically compatible schemes for computational fluid and solid mechanics. Appl. Math. Comput., 440:127629, 2023. Structure-preserving CG-DG schemes for hyperbolic systems 41

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Abgrall, M

    R. Abgrall, M. Dumbser, and P .-H. Maire. A simple and general framework for the construction of exactly div-curl-grad compatible discontinuous galerkin finite element schemes on unstructured simplex meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 541:114340, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Abgrall, J

    R. Abgrall, J. Lin, and Y . Liu. Active flux for triangular meshes for compressible flows problems. Beijing J. of Pure and Appl. Math. , 2:1–33, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Abgrall and Y

    R. Abgrall and Y . Liu. Robust pampa scheme in the dg formulation on unstructured triangular meshes: bound preservation, oscillation elimination, and boundary conditions, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Abgrall, P .-H

    R. Abgrall, P .-H. Maire, and M. Ricchiuto. Embedding general conservation-constraints in discretiza- tions of hyperbolic systems on arbitrary meshes: A multidimensional framework. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 36:243–339, 2026

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    Allaneau and A

    Y . Allaneau and A. Jameson. Connections between the filtered discontinuous galerkin method and the flux reconstruction approach to high order discretizations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , 200:3628–3636, 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Alonso Rodríguez and A

    A. Alonso Rodríguez and A. V alli. Finite element potentials. Applied Numerical Mathematics , 95:2–14, 2015

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Arnold, R.S

    D.N. Arnold, R.S. Falk, and R. Winther. Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications. Acta Numerica, 15:1–155, 2006

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Balsara, R

    D. Balsara, R. Käppeli, W. Boscheri, and M. Dumbser. Curl constraint-preserving reconstruction and the guidance it gives for mimetic scheme design. Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 5:235–294, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    D.S. Balsara. Multidimensional Riemann problem with self-similar internal structure Part I Ap- plication to hyperbolic conservation laws on structured meshes. J. Comput. Phys. , 277:163–200, 2014

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Balsara and M

    D.S. Balsara and M. Dumbser. Multidimensional Riemann problem with self-similar internal struc- ture Part II Application to hyperbolic conservation laws on unstructured meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 287:269–292, 2015

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Balsara, S

    D.S. Balsara, S. Garain, A. Taflove, and G. Montecinos. Computational electrodynamics in material media with constraint-preservation, multidimensional Riemann solvers and sub-cell resolution – Part II, higher order FVTD schemes. Journal of Computational Physics , 354:613–645, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Balsara and R

    D.S. Balsara and R. Käppeli. von Neumann stability analysis of globally constraint-preserving DGTD and PNPM schemes for the Maxwell equations using multidimensional Riemann solvers. Journal of Computational Physics , 376:1108–1137, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Barsukow, R

    W. Barsukow, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. A node-conservative vorticity preserving finite volume method for linear acoustics on unstructured grids. Mathematics of Computation, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Blanc, P

    X. Blanc, P . Hoch, and C. Lasuen. Composite finite volume schemes for the di ffusion equation on unstructured meshes. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , 156:207–217, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, M. Ioriatti, I. Peshkov, and E. Romenski. A structure-preserving stag- gered semi-implicit finite volume scheme for continuum mechanics. J. Comput. Phys., 424:109866, 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. A structure-preserving and thermodynami- cally compatible cell-centered Lagrangian finite volume scheme for continuum mechanics. SIAM J. Num. Anal. to appear

    work page

  21. [21]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, and P .-H. Maire. A new thermodynamically compatible finite volume scheme for Lagrangian gas dynamics. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 44:A1723–A1751, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Boscheri, R

    W. Boscheri, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. A 3D cell-centered ADER MOOD finite volume method for solving updated Lagrangian hyperelasticity on unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 449:110779, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Boscheri, R

    W. Boscheri, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. An unconventional divergence preserving finite-volume discretization of lagrangian ideal MHD. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 6:1665–1719, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Boujoudar, E

    M. Boujoudar, E. Franck, P . Hoch, C. Lasuen, Y . Le Hénaff, and P . Paragot. A composite finite vol- ume scheme for the Euler equations with source term on unstructured meshes. ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, 77:123–144, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Brezzi, J

    F. Brezzi, J. Douglas, and L.D. Marini. Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems. Numerische Mathematik, 47:217–233, 1985

    work page 1985

  26. [26]

    Brugnano and F

    L. Brugnano and F. Iavernaro. Line integral methods for conservative problems . Chapman et Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2016. 42 Rémi Abgrall et al

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Brugnano and F

    L. Brugnano and F. Iavernaro. Line integral solution of di fferential problems. Axioms, 7(2):36, 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Bruni Bruno and E

    L. Bruni Bruno and E. Zampa. Unisolvent and minimal physical degrees of freedom for the second family of polynomial differential forms. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer . Anal., 56(6):2239–2253, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Busto and M

    S. Busto and M. Dumbser. On thermodynamically compatible discontinuous Galerkin methods for continuum mechanics and turbulent shallow water flows. J. Sci. Comput., 93(2):56, 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Campos Pinto and E

    M. Campos Pinto and E. Sonnendrücker. Gauss-compatible Galerkin schemes for time-dependent Maxwell equations. Math. Comp., 85:2651–2685, 2016

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Caramana, D.E

    E.J. Caramana, D.E. Burton, M.J. Shashkov, and P .P . Whalen. The construction of compatible hydro- dynamics algorithms utilizing conservation of total energy. J. Comput. Phys., 146:227–262, 1998

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    Carré, S

    G. Carré, S. Del Pino, B. Després, and E. Labourasse. A cell-centered Lagrangian hydrodynamics scheme on general unstructured meshes in arbitrary dimension. J. Comput. Phys. , 228:5160–5183, 2009

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Castonguay, P .E

    P . Castonguay, P .E. Vincent, and A. Jameson. A new class of high-order energy stable flux recon- struction schemes for triangular elements. J. Sci. Comput., 51:224–256, 2012

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Chiocchetti and M

    S. Chiocchetti and M. Dumbser. An exactly curl-free staggered semi-implicit finite volume scheme for a first order hyperbolic model of viscous two-phase flows with surface tension. Journal of Scien- tific Computing, 94:24, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Cockburn, S

    B. Cockburn, S. Hou, and C. W. Shu. The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws IV: the multidimensional case. Math. Comput., 54:545–581, 1990

    work page 1990

  36. [36]

    Cockburn and C

    B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu. The Runge-Kutta local projection P1-Discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , 25:337–361, 1991

    work page 1991

  37. [37]

    Cockburn and C

    B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu. The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems. J. Comput. Phys., 141:199–224, 1998

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Del Grosso, W

    A. Del Grosso, W. Barsukow, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. An all-mach cell-centered multi- dimensional finite volume numerical scheme for the euler equations. Computers & Fluids, 306:106951, 2026

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Del Grosso, M.J

    A. Del Grosso, M.J. Castro, A. Chan, G. Gallice, R. Loubère, and P .H. Maire. A well-balanced, positive, entropy–stable, and multi–dimensional–aware finite volume scheme for 2d shallow–water equations with unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics , 503:112829, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Delmas, R

    V . Delmas, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. A node conservative cell-centered finite volume method for solving multidimensional euler equations over general unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 539:114246, 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Després and C

    B. Després and C. Mazeran. Symmetrization of Lagrangian gas dynamic in dimension two and multimdimensional solvers. C.R. Mecanique, 331:475–480, 2003

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Després and C

    B. Després and C. Mazeran. Lagrangian gas dynamics in two-dimensions and Lagrangian systems. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 178:327–372, 2005

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Dumbser D.S

    M. Dumbser D.S. Balsara and R. Abgrall. Multidimensional HLLC Riemann Solver for Unstruc- tured Meshes - With Application to Euler and MHD Flows. J. Comput. Phys., 261:172–208, 2014

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    M. Dubiner. Spectral methods on triangles and other domains. J. Sci. Comput., 6:345–390, 1991

    work page 1991

  45. [45]

    Dumbser, D

    M. Dumbser, D. Balsara, E.F. Toro, and C.D. Munz. A unified framework for the construction of one–step finite–volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes. J. Comput. Phys. , 227:8209–8253, 2008

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Dumbser, F

    M. Dumbser, F. Fambri, E. Gaburro, and A. Reinarz. On GLM curl cleaning for a first order reduction of the CCZ4 formulation of the Einstein field equations. J. Comput. Phys., 404:109088, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Dumbser, F

    M. Dumbser, F. Guercilena, S. Köppel, L. Rezzolla, and O. Zanotti. Conformal and covariant Z4 formulation of the Einstein equations: strongly hyperbolic first–order reduction and solution with discontinuous Galerkin schemes. Physical Review D, 97:084053, 2018

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Dumbser, I

    M. Dumbser, I. Peshkov, E. Romenski, and O. Zanotti. High order ADER schemes for a unified first order hyperbolic formulation of continuum mechanics: Viscous heat–conducting fluids and elastic solids. J. Comput. Phys., 314:824–862, 2016

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Dumbser, I

    M. Dumbser, I. Peshkov, E. Romenski, and O. Zanotti. High order ADER schemes for a unified first order hyperbolic formulation of Newtonian continuum mechanics coupled with electro–dynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 348:298–342, 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Dumbser, O

    M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, E. Gaburro, and I. Peshkov. A well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin method for the first–order Z4 formulation of the Einstein–Euler system. J. Comput. Phys. , 504:112875, 2024. Structure-preserving CG-DG schemes for hyperbolic systems 43

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Dumbser, O

    M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, and I. Peshkov. High-order discontinuous Galerkin schemes with subcell finite volume limiter and adaptive mesh refinement for a monolithic first-order BSSNOK formulation of the Einstein-Euler equations. Physical Review D, 110(8):084015, 2024

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Dumbser, O

    M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, and G. Puppo. Monolithic first-order BSSNOK formulation of the Einstein- Euler equations and its solution with path-conservative finite di fference central WENO schemes. Physical Review D, 111(10):104072, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Finite element quasi-interpolation and best approximation

    Alexandre Ern and Jean-Luc Guermond. Finite element quasi-interpolation and best approximation. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer . Anal., 51(4):1367–1385, 2017

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Finite Elements I: Approximation and Interpolation , vol- ume 72 of Texts in Applied Mathematics

    Alexandre Ern and Jean-Luc Guermond. Finite Elements I: Approximation and Interpolation , vol- ume 72 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2021

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Gaburro, M

    E. Gaburro, M. Ricchiuto, and M. Dumbser. On general and complete multidimensional riemann solvers for nonlinear systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Computers and Fluids, 2026

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    Gallice, A

    G. Gallice, A. Chan, R. Loubère, and P .-H. Maire. Entropy stable and positivity preserving godunov- type schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic systems on unstructured grid. Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 468:111493, 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Godlewski and P .-A

    E. Godlewski and P .-A. Raviart. Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Springer V erlag, 1996

    work page 1996

  58. [58]

    De Grazia, G

    D. De Grazia, G. Mengaldo, D. Moxey, P .E. Vincent, and S.J. Sherwin. Connections between the discontinuous galerkin method and high-order flux reconstruction schemes. Int. J. Numer . Methods Fluids, 75:860–877, 2014

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    Gurtin, E

    M.E. Gurtin, E. Fried, and L. Anand. The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continua . Cambridge University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Hazra, P

    A. Hazra, P . Chandrashekar, and D.S. Balsara. Globally constraint-preserving FR /DG scheme for Maxwell’s equations at all orders. Journal of Computational Physics , 394:298–328, 2019

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards , 49:409–436, 1952

    work page 1952

  62. [62]

    Hiptmair

    R. Hiptmair. Finite elements in computational electromagnetism. Acta Numerica, 11:237–339, 2002

    work page 2002

  63. [63]

    P . Hoch. Nodal extension of Approximate Riemann Solvers and nonlinear high order reconstruction for finite volume method on unstructured polygonal and conical meshes: the homogeneous case. HAL: https://hal.science/hal-03585115v2, 2022

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Hu and C.W

    C. Hu and C.W. Shu. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 150:97–127, 1999

    work page 1999

  65. [65]

    H.T. Huynh. A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous galerkin methods. 18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference , page 4079, 2007

    work page 2007

  66. [66]

    Hyman and M

    J.M. Hyman and M. Shashkov. Natural discretizations for the divergence, gradient, and curl on logically rectangular grids. Comput. Math. Appl., 33:81–104, 1997

    work page 1997

  67. [67]

    A. Jameson. A proof of the stability of the spectral di fference method for all orders of accuracy. Journal of Scientific Computing , 45:348–358, 2010

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    Jeltsch and M

    R. Jeltsch and M. Torrilhon. On curl–preserving finite volume discretizations for shallow water equations. BIT Numerical Mathematics , 46:S35–S53, 2006

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Jung and V

    J. Jung and V . Perrier. A curl preserving finite volume scheme by space velocity enrichment. Appli- cation to the low Mach number accuracy problem. Journal of Computational Physics , 515:113252, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Lipnikov, G

    K. Lipnikov, G. Manzini, and M. Shashkov. Mimetic finite di fference method. J. Comput. Phys. , 257:1163–1227, 2014

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Y . Liu, M. Vinokur, and Z.J. Wang. Spectral difference method for unstructured grids I: basic formu- lation. J. Comput. Phys., 216:780–801, 2006

    work page 2006

  72. [73]

    Loubère, P .-H

    R. Loubère, P .-H. Maire, and B. Rebourcet. Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Prob- lems: Basic and Fundamental Issues, edited by R. Abgrall and C.-W. Shu , chapter 13 Staggered and colocated Finite V olume scheme for Lagrangian hydrodynamics, pages 319–352. North Holland, 2016

    work page 2016

  73. [74]

    H. Luo, L. Luo, R. Nourgaliev, V .A. Mousseau, and N. Dinh. A reconstructed discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations on arbitrary grids. J. Comput. Phys., 229:6961–6978, 2010. 44 Rémi Abgrall et al

    work page 2010

  74. [75]

    H. Luo, Y . Xia, S. Spiegel, R. Nourgaliev, and Z. Jiang. A reconstructed discontinuous Galerkin method based on a Hierarchical WENO reconstruction for compressible flows on tetrahedral grids . J. Comput. Phys., 236:477–492, 2013

    work page 2013

  75. [76]

    P .-H. Maire. A high-order cell-centered lagrangian scheme for two-dimensional compressible fluid flows on unstructured meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 228:2391–2425, 2009

    work page 2009

  76. [77]

    Maire, R

    P .-H. Maire, R. Abgrall, J. Breil, and J. Ovadia. A cell-centered lagrangian scheme for two- dimensional compressible flow problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , 29:1781–1824, 2007

    work page 2007

  77. [78]

    Maire, I

    P .-H. Maire, I. Bertron, R. Chauvin, and B. Rebourcet. Thermodynamic consistency of cell-centered Lagrangian schemes. Computers and Fluids, 203:104527, 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [79]

    Margolin, M

    G. Margolin, M. Shashkov, and P .K. Smolarkiewicz. A discrete operator calculus for finite difference approximations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 187:365–383, 2000

    work page 2000

  79. [80]

    Monk.Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations

    P . Monk.Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003

    work page 2003

  80. [81]

    J. Nédélec. Mixed finite elements in R3. Numerische Mathematik, 35:315–341, 1980

    work page 1980

Showing first 80 references.