pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15731 · v1 · pith:7IZJ3OUVnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Enabling Intelligent Bidirectional Charging: A Real-World Communication Interface Between Electric Vehicles, Charging Infrastructure, and a Control Optimizer

Shangqing Wang , Abhirup Sain , Christopher Lehmann , Shiwei Shen , Razan Habeeb , Frank H. P. Fitzek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 17:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords bidirectional EV chargingvehicle-to-gridOCPP protocolsmart grid integrationfield deploymentload balancing5G communication
0
0 comments X

The pith

A field-deployed system lets electric vehicles share state-of-charge data before plugging in to enable optimized bidirectional charging and grid load balancing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the implementation of a user-aware bidirectional EV charging setup that gathers vehicle data early via wireless OBD-II and incorporates user preferences through a tablet interface. These inputs feed a centralized optimizer that makes dynamic charging and discharging decisions over a 5G-linked network using OCPP. Field tests at Ostra Sport Park in Dresden confirm the architecture works in practice, delivering improved load balancing and vehicle-to-grid performance. The work shows how simulation concepts can move to operational urban systems for sustainable mobility.

Core claim

The multi-level communication architecture integrates wireless OBD-II for pre-plug-in vehicle state-of-charge, a tablet for user preferences, and OCPP to connect the EV, charging station, and grid control center, allowing real-time data and optimization that achieves improved load balancing and robust vehicle-to-grid operation in field deployment.

What carries the argument

A multi-level communication architecture using the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) that links the EV via wireless OBD-II and 5G middleware to the user interface, charging station, and centralized control optimizer for dynamic bidirectional decisions.

If this is right

  • Early data acquisition before plug-in enables predictive control that improves overall system efficiency.
  • Incorporation of user preferences such as departure time and energy demand supports personalized yet grid-aware charging.
  • The architecture delivers measurable load balancing benefits during vehicle-to-grid operation in real urban settings.
  • The deployment serves as a practical benchmark for positive energy districts and scalable urban e-mobility.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same early-data approach could extend to fleets of commercial vehicles where departure schedules are known in advance.
  • Testing the system under varying 5G network congestion would reveal whether the claimed robustness holds at larger scale.
  • Linking the optimizer output directly to building energy management systems might further reduce peak grid demand.

Load-bearing premise

Real-time vehicle state-of-charge data obtained via wireless OBD-II before plug-in, together with user preferences and grid conditions, will arrive reliably and without significant latency to support beneficial dynamic charging and discharging decisions.

What would settle it

Repeated observations of delayed or missing wireless OBD-II state-of-charge data after plug-in that prevent the optimizer from completing charging or discharging adjustments before the user's departure time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15731 by Abhirup Sain, Christopher Lehmann, Frank H. P. Fitzek, Razan Habeeb, Shangqing Wang, Shiwei Shen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: High-Level Architecture: System Overview. The diagram shows key system elements: OBD-II interface, in-car processing unit, a private 5G network inclindng User Equipments (UEs), central optimizer, and charge point, enabling closed-loop data exchange between vehicle, user, and grid. transmitted securely via wireless link from diagnostic device to the in-car processing unit, with strong emphasis on reliable c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: including intended departure times, required energy, and planned mobility. By enabling the system to react to actual user needs instead of relying on predetermined defaults, this interface makes the architecture fully user-aware. Preferences are securely transmitted via the in-car processing unit and 5G network to the backend optimizer, where they are fused with live grid and vehicle data to compute optima… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Network Layer and Functional Layer Overview. The architecture features a private 5G network comprising 5G radio access network (RAN), local 5G edge cloud infrastructure, and separate functional entities for data aggregation, optimization, and charging control. 4.4 Driver mobile app/interface for preference input: A cross-platform mobile application is under development to capture driver preferences in real… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Urban Implementation System Architecture. Transition from campus testbed direct communication to a scalable 5G-enabled platform incorporating the Integrated Mobility and Energy Platform (IMEP) for data aggregation and Charging Optimization System (COS) for local control. This architecture enables simultaneous, low-latency communication with multiple EVs, charging stations, and the centralized backend optim… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents the real-world implementation and field validation of a user-aware bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging system developed within the Mobilities for EU and DymoBat projects in Dresden. Building on earlier simulation frameworks, the system enables transition from conceptual models to operational deployment in urban environments. To support grid flexibility and sustainable mobility, the solution combines real-time vehicle and user data with a centralized optimization platform to enable dynamic charging and discharging decisions. The architecture integrates a wireless On-Board Diagnostic II (OBD-II) interface and an open middleware node connected via a 5G campus network, allowing early access to vehicle state-of-charge before plug-in. A tablet-based interface captures user preferences such as departure time and energy demand, which are incorporated into the optimization together with grid conditions. A key contribution is a multi-level communication architecture linking the EV, charging station, user interface, and grid control center using the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP). The system integrates software, embedded hardware, and network communication for real-time charging management. Field deployment at Ostra Sport Park in Dresden demonstrates feasibility, improved load balancing, and robust vehicle-to-grid operation. The results show that early data acquisition and predictive control can enhance system efficiency. This work provides a practical benchmark for positive energy districts and future urban e-mobility systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the real-world implementation and field validation of a bidirectional EV charging system developed under the Mobilities for EU and DymoBat projects. It integrates a wireless OBD-II interface for pre-plug-in state-of-charge acquisition, a tablet-based user interface for preferences (departure time and energy demand), and an OCPP-based multi-level communication architecture over a 5G campus network to link EVs, charging stations, and a centralized optimization platform. The system is deployed at Ostra Sport Park in Dresden, where the authors claim it demonstrates feasibility, improved load balancing, and robust vehicle-to-grid operation through early data acquisition and predictive control.

Significance. If the reported improvements were quantitatively validated, the work would provide a useful practical benchmark for positive energy districts and urban e-mobility systems by showing how simulation-derived concepts can be translated into operational bidirectional charging infrastructure. The emphasis on early vehicle data access and open-protocol integration is a constructive contribution to grid-flexibility research.

major comments (1)
  1. [Field deployment and results] Field deployment section: The central claim that the Ostra Sport Park deployment demonstrates 'improved load balancing' and 'enhanced system efficiency' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics (e.g., peak-shaving percentages, energy throughput, load-profile statistics, or baseline comparisons with/without the optimizer). Only qualitative statements appear, which prevents verification of the asserted benefits and renders the field-validation contribution unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and results description repeatedly state that 'results show enhancement' without specifying the measured quantities or providing even summary statistics; adding a concise table or figure with key performance indicators would strengthen clarity.
  2. The description of the multi-level communication architecture would benefit from a simple block diagram or explicit data-flow sequence to illustrate how OBD-II data, user inputs, and OCPP messages reach the optimizer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the quantitative support for our field validation claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Field deployment and results] Field deployment section: The central claim that the Ostra Sport Park deployment demonstrates 'improved load balancing' and 'enhanced system efficiency' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics (e.g., peak-shaving percentages, energy throughput, load-profile statistics, or baseline comparisons with/without the optimizer). Only qualitative statements appear, which prevents verification of the asserted benefits and renders the field-validation contribution unverifiable.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies on qualitative descriptions and that quantitative metrics would better substantiate the claims of improved load balancing and enhanced system efficiency. In the revised version, we will expand the Field deployment section with specific data collected during the Ostra Sport Park trials. This will include peak-shaving percentages, bidirectional energy throughput values, load-profile statistics, and direct comparisons of grid load with and without the optimization platform. These metrics were recorded in the experimental logs but were summarized only qualitatively in the initial submission; we will add a dedicated table and accompanying figure to present them clearly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is absent and claims rest on direct field observations

full rationale

The manuscript is a system-integration and field-deployment report rather than a mathematical derivation. It describes hardware/software architecture, OCPP-based communication, wireless OBD-II data acquisition, and qualitative outcomes from the Ostra Sport Park deployment. No equations, optimization formulations, fitted parameters, or predictive models are presented that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. Mentions of 'earlier simulation frameworks' are contextual background and do not carry the load-bearing justification for the reported feasibility or load-balancing observations. The central claims therefore remain independent of any self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions about network reliability and protocol compatibility rather than introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Wireless OBD-II and 5G campus network provide reliable early access to vehicle state-of-charge data before plug-in.
    Invoked in the description of the architecture for real-time optimization.
  • domain assumption User preferences entered via tablet can be effectively incorporated into centralized charging optimization.
    Stated as part of the multi-level communication and control flow.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1041 out tokens · 71353 ms · 2026-05-20T17:20:45.253400+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Moving towards the sustainable city: The role of electric vehicles, renew- able energy and energy efficiency,

    J. Prata, E. Arsenio, and J. Pontes, “Moving towards the sustainable city: The role of electric vehicles, renew- able energy and energy efficiency,”WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 179, pp. 871–883, 2013. 7 9th E-Mobility Power System Integration Symposium | Berlin, Germany | 06-07 October 2025

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Bidi- rectional charging use cases: Innovations in e-mobility and power-grid flexibility,

    S. Wang, J. A. Cabrera, and F. H. P. Fitzek, “Bidi- rectional charging use cases: Innovations in e-mobility and power-grid flexibility,” inIEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Pattaya, Thailand, 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Simulation architecture for electric vehicle charging optimization in dresden ´s ostra district,

    S. Wang, S. I. Haider, S. Shen, F. Motazedian, R. Radeke, and F. H. P. Fitzek, “Simulation architecture for electric vehicle charging optimization in dresden ´s ostra district,” inInternational Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS), 2025, p. 56–65

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Dymobat research project,

    “Dymobat research project,” 2025, available at https://dymobat.de/, Accessed: 22 July 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Electric vehicles for a flexible energy system: Challenges and opportunities,

    S. Micari and G. Napoli, “Electric vehicles for a flexible energy system: Challenges and opportunities,”Energies, vol. 17, no. 22, p. 5614, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Sus- tainable urban mobility plan 2025plus: An overview,

    City of Dresden, Urban Development Division, “Sus- tainable urban mobility plan 2025plus: An overview,” Dresden, Germany, June 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Refined civitas process and impact evaluation framework,

    D. Engels, G. V . D. Bergh, and T. Breemersch, “Refined civitas process and impact evaluation framework,” Pub- lic deliverable, CIVITAS SATELLITE Project, Euro- pean Commission, Brussels, Belgium, Tech. Rep. D2.3, August 2017, deliverable No.: D2.3, Grant Agreement No.: 713813, Work package No.: WP2

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    A cloud-based development environment using hla and kubernetes for the co-simulation of a corporate electric vehicle fleet,

    K. Rehman, O. Kipouridis, S. Karnouskos, O. Frendo, H. Dickel, J. Lipps, and N. Verzano, “A cloud-based development environment using hla and kubernetes for the co-simulation of a corporate electric vehicle fleet,” in2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, 2019, pp. 47–54

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) high level architecture (HLA)– object model template (omt) specification,

    “IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) high level architecture (HLA)– object model template (omt) specification,”IEEE Std 1516.2-2010 (Revision of IEEE Std 1516.2-2000), 2010

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Enabling sustainable urban mobility: The role of 5g communication in the mobilities for eu project,

    S. Wang, C. Lehmann, R. Radeke, and F. H. P. Fitzek, “Enabling sustainable urban mobility: The role of 5g communication in the mobilities for eu project,” inIEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Pattaya, Thailand, 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Mobilities for eu,

    MobilitiesforEU, “Mobilities for eu,” https://mobilities- for.eu/, 2024, eU Horizon Project

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Bridging the gap between past and future in re: a scenario-based approach,

    P. Haumer, P. Heymans, M. Jarke, and K. Pohl, “Bridging the gap between past and future in re: a scenario-based approach,” inProceedings IEEE International Sympo- sium on Requirements Engineering (Cat. No. PR00188). IEEE, 1999, pp. 66–73

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    Sustainable rural electri- fication project management: An analysis of three case studies,

    L. del Río Carazo, E. Acquila-Natale, S. Iglesias-Pradas, and Ángel Hernández-García, “Sustainable rural electri- fication project management: An analysis of three case studies,”Energies, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1203, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    From simulation to sustainable urban mobility: A purpose-driven framework for advanced ev charging technology transfer,

    S. Wang, S. I. Haider, S. Shen, F. Motazedian, R. Radeke, and F. H. P. Fitzek, “From simulation to sustainable urban mobility: A purpose-driven framework for advanced ev charging technology transfer,” 2025, invited paper, sub- mitted to Proceedings of SMARTGREENS 2025 (Porto, Portugal: Springer LNCS/LNAI, 2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Remote electric vehicle battery monitoring and state of health estimation using telematics data,

    C. Schellenberg, T. Filler, and et al., “Remote electric vehicle battery monitoring and state of health estimation using telematics data,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Integra- tion of electric vehicles into power grids—a review of commercial and research solutions for ev fleet manage- ment,

    J. Nordholm, K. Westergren, and R. Johansson, “Integra- tion of electric vehicles into power grids—a review of commercial and research solutions for ev fleet manage- ment,”Energies, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Project sciurus final report,

    E. S. Catapult, “Project sciurus final report,” 2021, https://es.catapult.org.uk/news/project-sciurus-final- report/

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Parker project: Final results and rec- ommendations,

    P. P. Consortium, “Parker project: Final results and rec- ommendations,” 2020, https://parker-project.com/

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Transactive real-time electric vehicle charging management for commercial buildings with pv on-site generation,

    Q. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, C. Li, S. Huang, W. Wei et al., “Transactive real-time electric vehicle charging management for commercial buildings with pv on-site generation,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4939–4950, 2018. [20]ISO 15765-4: Road vehicles — Diagnostic communication over Controller Area Network (DoCAN) — Part 4: Requirements ...

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Open charge point protocol (ocpp),

    “Open charge point protocol (ocpp),” Open Charge Alliance, 2024. [Online]. Avail- able: https://openchargealliance.org/protocols/open- charge-point-protocol/

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Message queuing telemetry transport (mqtt),

    “Message queuing telemetry transport (mqtt),” OASIS,

    work page

  22. [22]

    Available: https://mqtt.org/

    [Online]. Available: https://mqtt.org/

    work page

  23. [23]

    Authentication and autho- rization mechanism on message queue telemetry trans- port protocol,

    Ö. Yerlikaya and G. Dalkılıc, “Authentication and autho- rization mechanism on message queue telemetry trans- port protocol,” in2018 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), 2018, pp. 145–150

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Mobilities for eu - projektübersicht dresden,

    Smart City Dresden, “Mobilities for eu - projektübersicht dresden,” https://smartcity.dresden.de/projekte/mobilities-for-eu, 2025, accessed: 22 July 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Data privacy and security concerns in iot- based traffic surveillance,

    B. Mathew, “Data privacy and security concerns in iot- based traffic surveillance,” 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Standards and protocols for interoperability in smart ev systems,

    S. Gupta, T. Varshney, P. Saini, and M. M. Hussain, “Standards and protocols for interoperability in smart ev systems,” inModern Computing Technologies for EV Efficiency and Sustainable Energy Integration. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 115–150

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Drivers of vehicle-to-everything (v2x) adoption: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective,

    I. Arpaci, M. A. Al-Sharafi, and M. A. Mahmoud, “Drivers of vehicle-to-everything (v2x) adoption: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective,”PloS one, vol. 20, no. 7, p. e0327084, 2025. 8

    work page 2025