pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17732 · v1 · pith:EZ5AH5ZRnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Structure preserving quaternion conjugate gradient-type methods for solving non-Hermitian quaternion linear systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords quaternion linear systemsnon-Hermitian matricesconjugate gradient methodstridiagonalizationstructure-preserving algorithmsnumerical linear algebraimage restoration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two new conjugate gradient-type methods solve non-Hermitian quaternion linear systems by reducing the coefficient matrix to tridiagonal form through unitary equivalence transformations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops two iterative solvers, QNHERLQ and QNHERQR, for non-Hermitian quaternion linear systems that arise in color image restoration and three-dimensional signal filtering. The methods rest on a quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure that applies unitary equivalence transformations to convert the coefficient matrix into tridiagonal form. This reduction is closely related to the quaternion Lanczos process for Hermitian matrices yet differs from biorthogonalization approaches for non-Hermitian cases. Convergence is shown to depend on the singular values of the matrix, with both algorithms possessing finite termination and constant cost per iteration. Numerical tests indicate greater robustness and effectiveness than QGMRES and QQMR.

Core claim

Non-Hermitian quaternion matrices admit a structure-preserving reduction to tridiagonal form via unitary equivalence transformations known as the quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure; this reduction supports the construction of conjugate gradient-type methods QNHERLQ and QNHERQR whose convergence depends on the singular values of the original coefficient matrix and which terminate after a finite number of steps with fixed per-iteration cost.

What carries the argument

The quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure, a unitary equivalence transformation that reduces non-Hermitian quaternion matrices to tridiagonal form while preserving the algebraic structure needed for conjugate gradient iterations.

If this is right

  • Convergence of QNHERLQ and QNHERQR is governed by the singular values of the coefficient matrix.
  • Both algorithms terminate after a finite number of iterations.
  • Each iteration step has constant computational cost.
  • The methods exhibit improved robustness over QGMRES and QQMR on problems from image restoration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tridiagonalization idea could be tested on other structured quaternion problems such as eigenvalue computations or least-squares formulations.
  • Floating-point stability of the unitary transformations would need separate verification beyond the exact-arithmetic analysis given in the paper.
  • Similar structure-preserving reductions might be developed for linear systems over other division algebras beyond quaternions.

Load-bearing premise

The tridiagonalization procedure can be computed stably and the resulting tridiagonal matrix retains the singular-value properties required for the conjugate gradient iterations to converge.

What would settle it

A concrete non-Hermitian quaternion matrix for which the unitary equivalence transformation either encounters breakdown before producing a tridiagonal form or for which the proposed iterations fail to terminate in finite steps despite the matrix being finite-dimensional.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider the non-Hermitian quaternion linear systems arising from color image restoration and three-dimensional signal filtering problems. For exploring to solve such systems, we present two innovative structure-preserving conjugate gradient-type methods, QNHERLQ and QNHERQR, which are based on the unitary equivalence transformations of the non-Hermitian quaternion matrices to tridiagonal forms, called quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure. The proposed tridiagonalization procedure for non-Hermitian quaternion matrices is closely related to the quaternion Lanczos process for Hermitian matrices, and is very different from the quaternion Lanczos biorthogonalization process for non-Hermitian matrices. The convergence of QNHERLQ and QNHERQR is discussed, which depends on the singular values of the coefficient matrix. Also we show that both algorithms have the finite termination property and constant costs per iteration step. Numerical results illustrate that the proposed algorithms are with the robustness and effectiveness compared with QGMRES and QQMR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces two structure-preserving conjugate gradient-type methods (QNHERLQ and QNHERQR) for non-Hermitian quaternion linear systems, based on a novel quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure that reduces the coefficient matrix A to tridiagonal form T via unitary equivalence transformations U^* A V = T. The authors claim that convergence depends on the singular values of A, that both methods have finite termination, and that they incur constant cost per iteration; numerical results are said to show robustness relative to QGMRES and QQMR for applications in color image restoration and 3D signal filtering.

Significance. If the tridiagonalization procedure can be rigorously shown to exist and remain stable for general non-Hermitian quaternion matrices, and if the claimed dependence of convergence on singular values together with finite termination can be proved, the work would supply new structure-preserving iterative solvers that exploit quaternion algebra directly rather than real or complex embeddings, potentially improving efficiency for the cited application domains.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 (Quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure)] The central construction (quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization) asserts that any non-Hermitian quaternion matrix can be reduced to tridiagonal form by unitary equivalence, yet no existence proof, breakdown analysis, or pivot strategy is supplied. The real dimension count (4n² for a general quaternion matrix versus roughly 4n(n-1) parameters from two unitary factors and only 4(3n-2) entries in the target tridiagonal matrix) indicates that the reduction cannot hold for generic A; this directly undermines the claimed applicability of QNHERLQ and QNHERQR to arbitrary non-Hermitian systems.
  2. [Section 4 (Convergence analysis)] The convergence statement that the methods' behavior depends on the singular values of the coefficient matrix is asserted without derivation or error analysis. No explicit relation between the singular values of A and the convergence rate (or residual bounds) of the resulting CG-type iterations on the tridiagonal form is derived, nor is any comparison made to the known singular-value dependence in real or complex non-Hermitian CG variants.
  3. [Section 5 (Algorithm properties and finite termination)] Finite termination and constant per-iteration cost are claimed for both algorithms, but the argument relies on the tridiagonalization succeeding without breakdown and on the preservation of necessary orthogonality relations in quaternion arithmetic. No forward-error bounds or numerical stability analysis for the quaternion operations is provided, leaving open whether the finite-termination property survives rounding errors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the precise definition of the quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip procedure (e.g., the recurrence relations or Householder-like steps) rather than only describing its relation to the Hermitian Lanczos process.
  2. [Section 6 (Numerical results)] Numerical experiments mention test matrices and error metrics only in passing; tables or figures should report matrix dimensions, condition numbers, iteration counts, and residual norms for each method to allow direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section 3 (Quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure)] The central construction (quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization) asserts that any non-Hermitian quaternion matrix can be reduced to tridiagonal form by unitary equivalence, yet no existence proof, breakdown analysis, or pivot strategy is supplied. The real dimension count (4n² for a general quaternion matrix versus roughly 4n(n-1) parameters from two unitary factors and only 4(3n-2) entries in the target tridiagonal matrix) indicates that the reduction cannot hold for generic A; this directly undermines the claimed applicability of QNHERLQ and QNHERQR to arbitrary non-Hermitian systems.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for a rigorous foundation. Regarding the dimension count, we believe there is a misunderstanding: the real dimension of the group of n×n unitary quaternion matrices (the compact symplectic group Sp(n)) is n(2n+1) per matrix. Thus, two such matrices contribute 2n(2n+1) = 4n² + 2n real degrees of freedom. This, together with the 4(3n−2) parameters of the tridiagonal form, is dimensionally consistent with the 4n²-dimensional space of general quaternion matrices (with redundancy allowing coverage). We will add a complete existence proof for the quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization, including a breakdown analysis and a suitable pivot strategy, to Section 3 in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4 (Convergence analysis)] The convergence statement that the methods' behavior depends on the singular values of the coefficient matrix is asserted without derivation or error analysis. No explicit relation between the singular values of A and the convergence rate (or residual bounds) of the resulting CG-type iterations on the tridiagonal form is derived, nor is any comparison made to the known singular-value dependence in real or complex non-Hermitian CG variants.

    Authors: We agree that the convergence analysis should be more explicit. In the revision, we will derive the relation between the singular values of the coefficient matrix A and the convergence behavior of QNHERLQ and QNHERQR. This will include residual bounds and a comparison to analogous results for real and complex non-Hermitian conjugate gradient methods. The updated analysis will be incorporated into Section 4. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 5 (Algorithm properties and finite termination)] Finite termination and constant per-iteration cost are claimed for both algorithms, but the argument relies on the tridiagonalization succeeding without breakdown and on the preservation of necessary orthogonality relations in quaternion arithmetic. No forward-error bounds or numerical stability analysis for the quaternion operations is provided, leaving open whether the finite-termination property survives rounding errors.

    Authors: We acknowledge this point. The finite termination property holds in exact arithmetic when the tridiagonalization proceeds without breakdown, and the constant cost per iteration follows from the tridiagonal structure. In the revised manuscript, we will add a discussion on the preservation of quaternion orthogonality relations and provide forward-error bounds under the assumption of exact arithmetic. A full numerical stability analysis in finite precision arithmetic is a substantial undertaking and will be noted as an important direction for future research, but we will clarify the exact-arithmetic properties more rigorously in Section 5. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new tridiagonalization procedure and derived CG methods are self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a novel quaternion Saunders-Simon-Yip tridiagonalization procedure for non-Hermitian matrices via unitary equivalence, explicitly distinguishing it from both Hermitian Lanczos and non-Hermitian biorthogonalization processes. Convergence is stated to depend on singular values of the coefficient matrix, with finite termination and constant per-iteration cost shown as consequences of the construction. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz imported from the authors' prior work; the central claims rest on the independent definition and analysis of the new procedure rather than tautological renaming or input-output equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard properties of quaternion algebra and numerical linear algebra (unitary equivalence, singular values, conjugate-gradient iteration). No free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are visible from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quaternion matrices admit unitary equivalence transformations to tridiagonal form via the described Saunders-Simon-Yip procedure.
    Invoked in the abstract as the foundation for the new methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5710 in / 1391 out tokens · 41216 ms · 2026-05-20T01:30:36.852671+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hamilton, On quaternions, In: Proceeding of the Royal Irish Academy , November 11, 1844

    W.R. Hamilton, On quaternions, In: Proceeding of the Royal Irish Academy , November 11, 1844

  2. [2]

    Hamilton, Elements of Quaternions, Longmans, Green and Co

    W.R. Hamilton, Elements of Quaternions, Longmans, Green and Co. , London, 1866

  3. [3]

    Adler, Quaternionic quantum mechanics and quantum fields, Oxford U.P

    S.L. Adler, Quaternionic quantum mechanics and quantum fields, Oxford U.P. , New York, 1994

  4. [4]

    Platnick, Quaternion calculus as a basic tool in computer graphics, Visual Comput

    D. Platnick, Quaternion calculus as a basic tool in computer graphics, Visual Comput. , 5 (1989), 2-13

  5. [5]

    Guan, M.T

    Y. Guan, M.T. Chu, D.L. Chu, SVD-based algorithms for the best rank-1 approximation of a symmetric tensor, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. , 39 (2018), 1095-1115

  6. [6]

    Parcollet, M

    T. Parcollet, M. Morchid, G. Linares, A survey of quaternion neural networks, AI Rev. , 53 (2020), 2957-2982

  7. [7]

    Saoud, R

    L.S. Saoud, R. Ghorbani, F. Rahmoune, Cognitive quaternion valued neural network and some applications, Neurocomputing, 221 (2017), 85-93

  8. [8]

    Le Bihan, J

    N. Le Bihan, J. Mars, Singular value decomposition of quaternion matrices: A new tool for vector-sensor signal processing, Signal Process., 84 (2004), 1177-1199

  9. [9]

    Subakan, B.C

    ¨O.N. Subakan, B.C. Vemuri, A quaternion framework for color image smoothing and segmen- tation, Int. J. Comput. Vis. , 91 (2011), 233-250

  10. [10]

    Jia, M.K

    Z.G. Jia, M.K. Ng, G.J. Song, Robust quaternion matrix completion with applications to image inpainting, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. , 26 (2019), 1070-5325

  11. [11]

    Jia, M.K

    Z.G. Jia, M.K. Ng, W. Wang, Color image restoration by saturation-value total variation,SIAM J. Imaging Sci. , 12 (2019), 972-1000

  12. [12]

    Chen, Z.G

    Y. Chen, Z.G. Jia, Y. Peng, Y.X. Peng, A new structure-preserving quaternion QR decompo- sition method for color image blind watermarking, Signal Process., 185 (2021), 108088

  13. [13]

    G.J. Song, W. Ding, M.K. Ng, Low-rank pure quaternion approximation for pure quaternion matrices, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. , 42 (2021), 58-82

  14. [14]

    M.K. Zak, F. Toutounian, Nested splitting conjugate gradient method for matrix equation AXB = C and preconditioning, Comput. Math. Appl. , 66 (2013), 269-278

  15. [15]

    R. Zhou, X. Wang, P. Zhou, A modified HSS iteration method for solving the complex linear matrix equation AXB = C, J. Comput. Math. , 34 (2016), 437-450

  16. [16]

    Tian, M.Y

    Z.L. Tian, M.Y. Tian, Z.Y. Liu, T.Y. Xu, The Jacobi and Gauss Seidel-type iteration methods for the matrix equation, Appl. Math. Comput. , 292 (2017), 63-75

  17. [17]

    Huang, C.F

    N. Huang, C.F. Ma, Modified conjugate gradient method for obtaining the minimum-norm solu- tion of the generalized coupled Sylvester-conjugate matrix equations, Appl. Math. Modell. , 40 (2016), 1260-1275

  18. [18]

    Saad, Krylov subspace methods for solving large unsymmetric linear systems, Math

    Y. Saad, Krylov subspace methods for solving large unsymmetric linear systems, Math. Com- put., 37 (1981), 105-126

  19. [19]

    Sonneveld, CGS, a fast Lanczos-type solver for nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J

    P. Sonneveld, CGS, a fast Lanczos-type solver for nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. , 10 (1989), 36-52

  20. [20]

    Freund, N.M

    R.W. Freund, N.M. Nachtigal, QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems, Numer. Math. , 60 (1991) 315-339

  21. [21]

    Lanczos, Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations, J

    C. Lanczos, Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, 49 (1952), 33-53

  22. [22]

    Sogabe, M

    T. Sogabe, M. Sugihara, S.L. Zhang, An extension of conjugate residual method to nonsym- metric linear systems, J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 226 (2009), 103-113

  23. [23]

    Saunders, H.D

    M.A. Saunders, H.D. Simon, E.L. Yip, Two conjugate-gradient-type methods for unsymmetric linear equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 25 (1988), 927-940

  24. [24]

    Jia, M.K

    Z.G. Jia, M.K. Ng, Structure preserving quaternion generalized minimal residual method, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. , 42 (2021), 616-634

  25. [25]

    T. Li, Q.W. Wang, Structure preserving quaternion full orthogonalization method with appli- cations, Numer Linear Algebra Appl. , 30 (2023), e2495

  26. [26]

    T. Li, Q.W. Wang, Structure preserving quaternion biconjugate gradient method, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. , 45 (2024), 306-326

  27. [27]

    T. Li, Q.W. Wang QQMR: A structure preserving quaternion quasi-minimal residual method. Math. Comp. , (2025), 1-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/4074

  28. [28]

    Opfer, The conjugate gradient algorithm applied to quaternion valued matrices, Journal of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics , 85 (2005), 660-672

    G. Opfer, The conjugate gradient algorithm applied to quaternion valued matrices, Journal of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics , 85 (2005), 660-672

  29. [29]

    Paige, M

    C.C. Paige, M. A. Saunders, Solutions of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 12 (1975), 617-629

  30. [30]

    Ghiloni, V

    R. Ghiloni, V. Moretti, A. Perotti, Continuous slice functional calculus in quaternionic Hilbert spaces, Rev. Math. Phys. , 25 (2013), 1350006. This manuscript is for review purposes only. 32 B.H HUANG, T LI, W LI

  31. [31]

    Jia, M.X

    Z.G. Jia, M.X. Wei, M. Zhao, Y. Chen, A new real structure-preserving quaternion QR algo- rithm, J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 343 (2018), 26-48

  32. [32]

    Janovsk´a, G

    D. Janovsk´a, G. Opfer, Givens’ transformation applied to quaternion valued matrices, BIT Numer. Math. , 43 (2003), 991-1002

  33. [33]

    Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chem- istry and Engineering, Westview Press, Boulder, Co , 2001

    S.H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chem- istry and Engineering, Westview Press, Boulder, Co , 2001

  34. [34]

    S.H. Chan, R. Khoshabeh, K.B. Gibson, et al., An augmented Lagrangian method for total variation video restoration, IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 20 (2011), 3097-3111

  35. [35]

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 13 (2004), 600-612

  36. [36]

    Hansen, J.G

    P.C. Hansen, J.G. Nagy, D.P. O’leary, Deblurring images: matrices, spectra, and filtering, SIAM, 2006

  37. [37]

    Smith, Alpha and the history of digital compositing, Technical Memo 7, Microsoft Cor- poration, 1995

    A.R. Smith, Alpha and the history of digital compositing, Technical Memo 7, Microsoft Cor- poration, 1995. Appendix A. Proof of Theorem 3.4. We will prove the assertion by induc- tion on the order n. For n = 1, the result is trivial. Assume that the assertion holds for 1 ≤ n < l , i.e., there exist orthogonally JRS-symplectic matrices P, Q ∈ R4n×4n such t...