pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17810 · v1 · pith:C7JDKMW4new · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Amplification of Weak Forces via Parametric Interactions and Non-Markovian Effects in Cavity Optomechanics

Y. F. Li , Ze Wang , W. Y. Hu , Yan-Hui Zhou , Cheng Shang , and H. Z. Shen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords weak force amplificationcavity optomechanicsnon-Markovian environmentdegenerate optical parametric amplifiervibrational resonanceexcitation backflowquantum sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Controlling environmental spectral width converts non-Markovian dynamics to Markovian in optomechanical systems and boosts weak force amplification via excitation backflow.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines amplification of weak forces inside cavity optomechanical systems that contain a degenerate optical parametric amplifier. Under Markovian conditions the system amplifies a low-frequency force using two high-frequency modulations through vibrational resonance, with the gain set by the amplifier strength and phase. The analysis then includes a non-Markovian bath modeled as an ensemble of oscillators whose spectral width can be tuned. Reducing this width drives a transition from non-Markovian to Markovian regime that produces a clear rise in amplification. The rise is traced to excitation backflow arising from the cavity interacting with the non-Markovian environment.

Core claim

In cavity-optomechanical systems incorporating a degenerate optical parametric amplifier, the amplification of weak forces exhibits a conversion from the non-Markovian regime to the Markovian regime when the environmental spectral width is controlled. This transition produces a remarkable improvement in amplification that originates from the excitation backflow generated via the interplay between the cavity and the non-Markovian environment. By adjusting the degenerate optical parametric amplifier the approach achieves the improved amplification even while remaining inside the non-Markovian regime.

What carries the argument

A degenerate optical parametric amplifier coupled to a cavity whose environment is an ensemble of oscillators whose spectral width is a controllable parameter that induces excitation backflow during the non-Markovian to Markovian transition.

If this is right

  • Two high-frequency signals can amplify a faint low-frequency force via vibrational resonance once the degenerate optical parametric amplifier strength and phase are tuned.
  • Controlling the environmental spectral width produces a regime conversion that markedly raises the amplification factor.
  • The improvement is generated by excitation backflow from the cavity-non-Markovian-environment interaction.
  • The same parametric control works inside the non-Markovian regime and therefore opens routes for quantum sensing in structured baths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental platforms with tunable spectral baths could directly test the predicted backflow contribution by comparing gain curves against the Markovian baseline.
  • The same spectral-width knob may prove useful in other quantum sensors where non-Markovian noise is unavoidable but can be engineered.
  • The approach suggests examining whether similar backflow-enhanced amplification appears in related optomechanical or electromechanical devices.

Load-bearing premise

The non-Markovian environment can be represented as an ensemble of infinite oscillators whose spectral width acts as a direct control parameter that produces a clean Markovian transition without adding extra decoherence channels or altering the cavity-amplifier coupling.

What would settle it

Measure the weak-force amplification gain while sweeping the environmental spectral width and check whether the gain rises sharply at the calculated Markovian-transition point in a manner quantitatively accounted for by the predicted excitation backflow.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17810 by and H. Z. Shen, Cheng Shang, W. Y. Hu, Yan-Hui Zhou, Y. F. Li, Ze Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Setup of the optomechanical system driven by four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The influences of the modulation frequency Ω on the amp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , we show that the amplification of the weak signal is sensitive to both the strength G and phase θ changing of the DOPA. When ∆H is larger, the influences of the G and θ on the relative response amplitude A/A0 become more obvious. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Impact of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Effect of environmental spectrum width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Impact of the modulation frequency Ω on ampli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The phenomenon of enhancing a weak low-frequency me [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The influence of the environmental spectral width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Impact of environmental spectral width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The non-Markovian limit and Markovian cases. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Effect of strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Weak force amplification describes the process of amplifying a faint low-frequency signal by means of an additional high-frequency modulation, which plays a vital role in quantum sensing and high-precision measurement. However, the potential enhancement of weak-force amplification in non-Markovian environments has received little attention. In this paper, we firstly study the amplification of weak forces within cavity-optomechanical systems incorporating a degenerate optical parametric amplifier (DOPA) under the Markovian assumption, which can be amplified via using two high-frequency signals via vibrational resonance through adjusting the strength and phase of the DOPA with different pumping frequencies. Moreover, we extend the study of the amplification of the weak force to the non-Markovian environment composed of an ensemble of infinite oscillators. We reveal that the amplification exhibits a conversion from the non-Markovian regime to Markovian regime by controlling environmental spectral width. Such a transition facilitates a remarkable improvement in amplification, and this enhancement originates from the excitation backflow generated via the interplay between the cavity and the non-Markovian environment. By controlling DOPA to amplify weak forces, the study achieves amplification in the non-Markovian regime, offering new directions for quantum optics research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines weak-force amplification in a cavity optomechanical system augmented by a degenerate optical parametric amplifier (DOPA). Under the Markovian approximation, amplification is achieved through vibrational resonance by tuning the DOPA strength and phase with different pumping frequencies. The study then extends the analysis to a non-Markovian environment modeled as an ensemble of infinite oscillators, demonstrating a transition from non-Markovian to Markovian regime by controlling the environmental spectral width. This transition is claimed to yield a remarkable improvement in amplification originating from excitation backflow due to the cavity-non-Markovian environment interplay.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing the separation of effects, the work would provide a concrete example of non-Markovian backflow improving a metrological task in optomechanics, extending beyond standard Markovian treatments and offering a tunable handle via DOPA parameters. The approach is timely for quantum sensing, but its impact hinges on demonstrating that the reported gain is not an artifact of rescaled damping.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (non-Markovian extension): The claim that varying the environmental spectral width produces a clean non-Markovian-to-Markovian transition whose only new ingredient is excitation backflow requires explicit demonstration that the integrated bath strength remains fixed. Standard Lorentzian spectral densities take the form J(ω) = (α γ ω_c²)/((ω-ω_c)² + γ²); unless the prefactor α is renormalized when γ is changed, both the memory kernel and the effective optomechanical damping (and DOPA-assisted force term) vary simultaneously. The manuscript does not show this renormalization in the Heisenberg-Langevin or master-equation derivation, so the numerical improvement cannot yet be attributed solely to backflow.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'two high-frequency signals via vibrational resonance' is introduced without prior definition; the main text should clarify whether these refer to the DOPA pump and the weak force or to additional modulations.
  2. [Model section] Notation: the environmental spectral width is treated as an independent control parameter, but its relation to the cavity-DOPA coupling strength should be stated explicitly in the model section to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the non-Markovian analysis. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (non-Markovian extension): The claim that varying the environmental spectral width produces a clean non-Markovian-to-Markovian transition whose only new ingredient is excitation backflow requires explicit demonstration that the integrated bath strength remains fixed. Standard Lorentzian spectral densities take the form J(ω) = (α γ ω_c²)/((ω-ω_c)² + γ²); unless the prefactor α is renormalized when γ is changed, both the memory kernel and the effective optomechanical damping (and DOPA-assisted force term) vary simultaneously. The manuscript does not show this renormalization in the Heisenberg-Langevin or master-equation derivation, so the numerical improvement cannot yet be attributed solely to backflow.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point on separating the effects of non-Markovianity from changes in effective damping. In our Heisenberg-Langevin derivation for the non-Markovian environment, the spectral density is modeled as the standard Lorentzian J(ω) = (α γ ω_c²)/((ω-ω_c)² + γ²). To isolate the memory effects and excitation backflow, we renormalize the prefactor α ∝ 1/γ when varying γ, thereby keeping the integrated bath strength ∫J(ω)dω fixed. This ensures the effective optomechanical damping rate (and the DOPA-assisted force term) remains constant while the memory kernel decay time is tuned. Although this renormalization was used in our calculations to produce the reported transition and improvement, we acknowledge that the manuscript does not explicitly state or derive this step. We will add a dedicated paragraph in §4 detailing the renormalization procedure, including the explicit condition for fixed integrated strength, the resulting Markovian limit as γ → ∞, and supplementary numerical checks confirming constant damping. These revisions will allow the amplification gain to be attributed to the non-Markovian backflow as claimed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain; model and attribution remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper first derives weak-force amplification under the Markovian assumption using DOPA parametric interactions and vibrational resonance, then extends the model to a non-Markovian bath of infinite oscillators whose spectral width is varied to induce a regime transition. The improvement is attributed to excitation backflow from cavity-environment interplay rather than being defined as the input or obtained by fitting a parameter that is then renamed a prediction. No self-citation load-bearing step, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is present in the provided text, and the central claim does not reduce by construction to its own assumptions or prior fitted values. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum-optics master-equation assumptions plus the specific modeling choice of an infinite-oscillator bath whose spectral density is tunable. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • DOPA strength and phase
    Tuned to achieve vibrational resonance for different pumping frequencies; values are adjusted to maximize amplification.
  • environmental spectral width
    Controlled parameter that drives the non-Markovian to Markovian conversion.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The environment is modeled as an ensemble of infinite harmonic oscillators with a controllable spectral density.
    Invoked when extending the study to the non-Markovian regime.
  • standard math Standard Markovian master equation applies under the initial assumption before spectral-width tuning.
    Used for the first part of the analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1433 out tokens · 34481 ms · 2026-05-20T01:25:16.618939+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The Lorentzian spectral density of the bath takes J(ω′)=κλ²/(2π(λ²+(ω′−ω_m)²)), which is implemented via all-optical setups and pseudomode methods. With Eq. (37), we get f(t−τ)=½κλe^{−λ|t−τ|}

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean arrow_from_z unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We reveal that the amplification exhibits a conversion from the non-Markovian regime to Markovian regime by controlling environmental spectral width. Such a transition facilitates a remarkable improvement in amplification, and this enhancement originates from the excitation backflow

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 167 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    into the equations of motion for the mechanical mode in Eq. ( 7), and then write the equation of motion merely for the mechanical mode as ¨x + γ ˙x = − ω 2 0x − f cos (ωt ) m − F cos (Ω t) m + c ( − 2ia + κ + 4Geiθ ) ( 2ia + κ + 4Ge− iθ ) b2m , (9) where c = 4 ℏε2 mξκ. With this, we separate the slow and fast motions by [ 2, 97] x(t) = X(t) + ϕ (t, τ = Ω ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    3(a), we find when the strength G of the DOPA increases from 0 to G = 0

    As shown in Fig. 3(a), we find when the strength G of the DOPA increases from 0 to G = 0 . 06ω 0, A/A 0 can be gradually enhanced. Sig- nificantly, when the strength G = 0, the amplification of the weak signal is significantly weaker than G = 0 . 02ω 0,

    work page

  3. [3]

    04ω 0, and 0 . 06ω 0. Figure 3(b) shows that the rela- tive response amplitude A/A 0 of the system can also be tuned by manipulating θ. Compared to the response at θ = 0, under the condition of maintaining a strength G = 0 . 02ω 0, θ = π/ 2, θ = π , and θ = 3 π/ 2 result in lower relative response amplitude A/A 0. This result re- veals the potential appli...

    work page

  4. [4]

    ) + f cos (ωt ) ˆx, (15) where ∆ H = ω n − ω m is the frequency detuning be- tween the optical fields εn and εm

    of the sys- tem at the frequency ω m is changed as ˆH = 1 2 mω 2 0 ˆx2 + ˆp2 2m + ℏ∆ 0ˆa† ˆa − ℏξˆa† ˆaˆx − iℏ√ κε m ( ˆa − ˆa† ) − iℏ√ κε n ( ei∆ H tˆa − e− i∆ H tˆa† ) + iℏG(ˆa†2e− i∆ H teiθ − H.c. ) + f cos (ωt ) ˆx, (15) where ∆ H = ω n − ω m is the frequency detuning be- tween the optical fields εn and εm. We assume that this DOPA is excited by a pump...

    work page

  5. [5]

    4(a), in the absence of the DOPA, A/A 0 has a maximum

    As shown in Fig. 4(a), in the absence of the DOPA, A/A 0 has a maximum. We find in Fig. 4(b) that when G = 0 . 02ω 0, the relative response amplitude exhibits both increasing and decreasing trends. The peak of A/A 0 increases when ∆ H is larger (see red dotted line and green dash-dotted line in Fig. 4(b)). But the peak of A/A 0 decreases when ∆ H = 80ω and...

    work page

  6. [6]

    is changed to ˆH = 1 2 mω 2 0 ˆx2 + ˆp2 2m + ℏ∆ 0ˆa†ˆa − ℏξˆa†ˆaˆx − iℏ√ κεm ( ˆa − ˆa†) + iℏG(ˆa†2eiθ − H.c. ) + f cos (ωt ) ˆx + F cos (Ω t) ˆx + ℏ ∑ k ∆ kˆb† k ˆbk + iℏ ∑ k (gkˆaˆb† k − g∗ kˆa†ˆbk), (25) where ∆ k = ω k − ω m defines the detuning of kth mode (eigenfrequency ω k) of the environment from the driv- ing field. ˆbk(ˆb† k) is the annihilation ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    satisfy d dt ˆa(t) = − i∆ 0ˆa(t) + iξˆa(t)ˆx(t) + 2Geiθ ˆa†(t) + √ κ (εm + ˆain) − ∑ k g∗ kˆbk(t), (26) d dt ˆx(t) = ˆp(t) m , (27) d dt ˆp(t) = − γ ˆp(t) − mω 2 0 ˆx(t) + ℏξˆa†(t)ˆa(t) − f cos (ωt ) − F cos (Ω t) , (28) d dt ˆbk(t) = − i∆ kˆbk(t) + gkˆa(t). (29) With mean-field amplitudes ˆa → β , ˆx → x, ˆp → p, and ˆbk → bk [95, 96], the equations give ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    as β = 2√ κεm(4eiθG − 2ia + κ) b , (38) where we can adiabatically eliminate the optical mode by substituting Eq. (

    work page

  9. [9]

    into the equations of motion for the mechanical mode in Eq. ( 32), and then write the equation of motion merely for the mechanical mode as ¨x + γ ˙x = − ω 2 0x − f cos (ωt ) m − F cos (Ω t) m + c ( − 2ia + κ + 4Geiθ ) ( 2ia + κ + 4Ge− iθ ) b2m . (39) With this, Eq. ( 39) can be decomposed into a slow mo- tion X(t) and a fast motion ϕ (t, τ ), and the evol...

    work page

  10. [10]

    ( 39) as follow ¨ϕ + γ ˙ϕ ≈ − F cos (Ω t) m

    from the original equation Eq. ( 39) as follow ¨ϕ + γ ˙ϕ ≈ − F cos (Ω t) m . (41) Assuming Ω is a large frequency, we can neglect the terms containing ϕ and its higher-order terms based on the fact that ¨ϕ ≫ ˙ϕ ≫ ϕ, ϕ 2, ϕ 3. From Eq. ( 41), we find ⟨ ϕ 2⟩ = F 2/m 2 2 (Ω 4 + γ 2Ω 2) . (42) The effective potential Veff (X) corresponding to the slow motion of ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    the role played by the high-frequency mechanical driv- ing in shaping the system potential

    is the potential function in the absence of the high-frequency mechanical force [ 119], which corresponds to V0(X) = mω 2 0X 2 2 + f cos (ωt ) X − 2ℏε2 mκ 2 [ 2G ( eiθ + e− iθ) + κ ] ϑ (κ 2 − 16G2)3/ 2 + 4Gκ 4U [2a(eiθ + e− iθ) − iκ(eiθ − e− iθ )] b (44) − 64G2κU [a(16G2 − κ 2) + 16iG3(eiθ − e− iθ )] b + 128U G3κ 2[iκ(eiθ − e− iθ ) − a(eiθ + e− iθ)] b . t...

    work page

  12. [12]

    02ω 0, θ = 0

    as a function of F , where the strength and phase of the probe field of the DOPA are fixed as (a) G = 0, θ = 0; (b) G = 0 . 02ω 0, θ = 0. Other parameters are the same as Fig. 2. Compared to the Markovian environment, the relative response amplitude A/A 0 gradually decreases when the weak mechanical signal is tuned by a high-frequency me- chanical signal. S...

    work page

  13. [13]

    9(a), we discuss that the relative response amplitude A/A 0 varies with the high-frequency force F without the participation of the DOPA (the strength G = 0 and phase θ = 0)

    In Fig. 9(a), we discuss that the relative response amplitude A/A 0 varies with the high-frequency force F without the participation of the DOPA (the strength G = 0 and phase θ = 0). Under the resonator stationary, all three curves exhibit reso- nance peaks, indicating the occurrence of the VR phe- nomenon. The resonance peak shifts towards larger val- ue...

    work page

  14. [14]

    02ω 0 and θ = 3π/ 2)

    as a function of the power Pn of the optical signal, which corresponds to the Markovian and non-Markovian environments with the different environmen- tal spectrum width λ and DOPA involvement ( G = 0 . 02ω 0 and θ = 3π/ 2). Other parameters are the same as Fig. 2. response amplitude A/A 0 of the system versus the ampli- tude of the optical signal Pn with t...

    work page

  15. [15]

    02ω 0 and θ = 3 π/ 2

    as a function of the power Pn of the optical signal under different values of ∆ H , where we take G = 0. 02ω 0 and θ = 3 π/ 2. This figure shows the consistency of the relative response amplitude between non-Markovian limit with λ = 200ω 0 and Markovian approximation. Other parameters are the same as Fig. 2. In Fig. 12, we choose the same DOPA strength as i...

    work page

  16. [16]

    12(b), when ∆ H = 100 ω , the relative response amplitude A/A 0 also has a little increase in the non-Markovian environ- ment

    Interestingly, from Fig. 12(b), when ∆ H = 100 ω , the relative response amplitude A/A 0 also has a little increase in the non-Markovian environ- ment. Compared to the Markovian environment, the am- plification effect of the optical signal on the weak me- chanical signal in the non-Markovian environment signif- icantly increases. Figure 13 shows the relativ...

    work page

  17. [17]

    It stems from the fact that the correla- tion function f (t) approaches κδ(t) when the spectral width λ is close to infinity, which causes Eq

    This figure shows the consistency of the relative response amplitude A/A 0 between non- Markovian limit with λ = 200 ω 0 and Markovian ap- proximation. It stems from the fact that the correla- tion function f (t) approaches κδ(t) when the spectral width λ is close to infinity, which causes Eq. (

    work page

  18. [18]

    ( 21) under the Markovian approximation

    in the non-Markovian regime being equal to Eq. ( 21) under the Markovian approximation. Figures 12, 13 and 14 present the influences of non- Markovian effects on the relative response amplitude with the DOPA for G = 0. 02ω 0 and θ = 3π/ 2. In Fig. 15, we show the variation of A/A 0 in the strength of the DOPA. As expected, when the strength G of the DOPA in...

    work page

  19. [19]

    P. S. Landa and P. V. E. McClintock, Vibrational reso- nance, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, L433 (2000)

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Gitterman, Bistable oscillator driven by two periodi c fields, J

    M. Gitterman, Bistable oscillator driven by two periodi c fields, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, L355 (2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    V. N. Chizhevsky, E. Smeu, and G. Giacomelli, Experi- mental Evidence of ”Vibrational Resonance” in an Op- tical System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 220602 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    V. N. Chizhevsky and G. Giacomelli, Experimental and theoretical study of vibrational resonance in a bistable system with asymmetry, Phys. Rev. E 73, 022103 (2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    C. G. Yao, Y. Liu, and M. Zhan, Frequency-resonance- enhanced vibrational resonance in bistable systems, Phys. Rev. E 83, 061122 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    V. N. Chizhevsky, Analytical study of vibrational reso- nance in an overdamped bistable oscillator, Int. J. Bi- furcation Chaos 18, 1767 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    A. A. Zaikin, L. L´ opez, J. P. Baltan´ as, J. Kurths, and M. A. F. Sanju´ an, Vibrational resonance in a noise-induced structure, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011106 (2002)

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    I. I. Blekhman and P. S. Landa, Conjugate resonances and bifurcations in nonlinear systems under biharmoni- cal excitation, Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 39, 421 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    S. Wu, Y. N. Wang, C. C. Li, M. Xie, Y. B. Cheng, and B. X. Fan, Weak-force amplification in a cavity-optomechanical system based on the vibrational- resonance mechanism, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    V. N. Chizhevsky and G. Giacomelli, Experimental and theoretical study of the noise-induced gain degrada- tion in vibrational resonance, Phys. Rev. E 70, 062101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Ullner, A

    E. Ullner, A. Zaikin, J. Garc ´ ıa-Ojalvo, R. B´ ascones,and J. Kurths, Vibrational resonance and vibrational prop- agation in excitable systems, Phys. Lett. A 312, 348 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Chowdhury, M

    A. Chowdhury, M. G. Clerc, S. Barbay, I. Robert-Philip, and R. Braive, Weak signal enhancement by nonlin- ear resonance control in a forced nano-electromechanical resonator, Nat. Commun. 11, 2400 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    J. P. Baltan´ as, L. L´ opez, I. I. Blechman, P. S. Landa, A. Zaikin, J. Kurths, and M. A. F. Sanju´ an, Experimental evidence, numerics, and theory of vibrational resonance in bistable systems, Phys. Rev. E 67, 066119 (2003)

    work page 2003

  32. [32]

    V. N. Chizhevsky, Vibrational higher-order resonance s in an overdamped bistable system with biharmonic ex- citation, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042924 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    V. N. Chizhevsky, Noise-induced suppression of non- linear distortions in a bistable system with biharmonic excitation in vibrational resonance, Phys. Rev. E 92, 032902 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    W. Zhao, S. D. Zhang, A. Miranowicz, and H. Jing, Weak-force sensing with squeezed optomechanics, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 224211 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    J. Q. Zhang, Y. Li, M. Feng, and Y. Xu, Precision mea- surement of electrical charge with optomechanically in- duced transparency, Phys. Rev. A 86,053806 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Gavartin, P

    E. Gavartin, P. Verlot, and T. J. Kippenberg, A hy- brid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasen- sitive force measurements, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 509 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Schliesser, O

    A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, R. Rivi` ere, G. Anetsberger , and T. J. Kippenberg, Resolved-sideband cooling and position measurement of a micromechanical oscillator close to the Heisenberg uncertainty limit, Nat. Phys. 5, 509 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Basiri-Esfahani, U

    S. Basiri-Esfahani, U. Akram, and G. J. Milburn, Phonon number measurements using single photon opto-mechanics, New J. Phys. 14, 085017 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    A. G. Krause, M. Winger, T. D. Blasius, Q. Lin, and O. Painter, A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer, Nat. Photon. 6, 768 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    F. F. Liu, S. Alaie, Z. C. Leseman, and M. Hossein- Zadeh, Sub-pg mass sensing and measurement with an optomechanical oscillator, Opt. Express 21, 19555 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Optomechanical Transducers for Long- Distance Quantum Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini and O. Painter, Proposal for an Op- tomechanical Traveling Wave Phonon-Photon Transla- tor, New J. Phys. 13, 013017 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    W. Z. Zhang, J. Cheng, and L. Zhou, Quantum control 14 gate in cavity optomechanical system, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48, 015502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Kleckner, I

    D. Kleckner, I. Pikovski, E. Jeffrey, L. Ament, E. Eliel, J. van den Brink, and D. Bouwmeester, Cre- ating and verifying a quantum superposition in a micro-optomechanical system, New J. Phys. 10, 095020 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Y. B. Chen, Macroscopic quantum mechanics: Theory and experimental concepts of optomechanics, J. Phys. B 46, 104001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. R. Vanner, M. Aspelmeyer, M. S. Kim, and ˇC. Brukner, Probing Planck-scale physics with quantum optics, Nat. Phys. 8, 393 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Romero-Isart, A

    O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, F. Blaser, R. Kaltenbaek, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, Large Quantum Superpositions and Interference of Mas- sive Nanometer-Sized Objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 020405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Xiong, L

    H. Xiong, L. G. Si, X. Y. L¨ u, X. X. Yang, and Y. Wu, Review of cavity optomechanics in the weak-coupling regime: from linearization to intrinsic nonlinear inter- actions, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 58, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Y. Wang, J. L. Wu, J. X. Han, Y. Xia, Y. Y. Jiang, and J. Song, Enhanced phonon blockade in a weakly coupled hybrid system via mechanical parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 024009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Ex- act steady state of a Kerr resonator with one- and two- photon driving and dissipation: Controllable Wigner- function multimodality and dissipative phase transi- tions, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Y. H. Zhou, S. S. Zhang, H. Z. Shen, and X. X. Yi, Second-order nonlinearity induced transparency, Opt. Lett. 42, 1289 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    V. S. Ilchenko, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, and L. Maleki, Nonlinear optics and crystalline whisper- ing gallery mode cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 043903 (2004)

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Y. F. Jiao, T. X. Lu, and H. Jing, Optomechanical second-order sidebands and group delays in a Kerr res- onator, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013843 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    B. J. Li, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, X. W. Xu, L. Zhang, L. M. Kuang, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal optical solitons in a spinning Kerr resonator, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053522 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Huang, A

    R. Huang, A. Miranowicz, J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 153601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    X. F. Qiao, Z. H. Yao, and H. Yang, Strongly enhanced photon-pair blockade with three-wave mixing by quan- tum interference, Phys. Rev. A 110, 053702(2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. T. Liu, S. Zhang, and H. F. Wang, Magnon blockade induced by parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. A 109, 043712 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    R. Hou, W. Zhang, X. Han, H. F. Wang, and S. Zhang, Magnon blockade based on the Kerr nonlinearity in cav- ity electromagnonics, Phys. Rev. A 109, 033721 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    N. Yuan, S. Y. Li, N. Wang, T. T. Dong, and A. D. Zhu, Phase-modulated nonreciprocal photon blockade and transmission via optomechanically induced Kerr nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. A 109, 053526 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    X. W. Xu and Y. Li, Tunable photon statistics in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043822 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Xuereb, M

    A. Xuereb, M. Barbieri, and M. Paternostro, Multipar- tite optomechanical entanglement from competing non- linearities, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013809 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P. B. Li, X. Y. L¨ u, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Exponentially enhanced light-matter inter- action, cooperativities, and steady-state entanglement using parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1994)

    work page 1994

  65. [65]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  66. [66]

    H. P. Breuer, E. M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Pro- cesses in Open Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    H. T. Tan and W. M. Zhang, Non-Markovian dynam- ics of an open quantum system with initial system- reservoir correlations: A nanocavity coupled to a coupled-resonator optical waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 83, 032102 (2011)

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    Cavaliere, G

    F. Cavaliere, G. Gemme, G. Benenti, D. Ferraro, and M. Sassetti, Dynamical blockade of a reservoir for optimal performances of a quantum battery, Commun. Phys. 8, 76 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Wilkey, J

    A. Wilkey, J. Suelzer, Y. N. Joglekar, and G. Vemuri, Theoretical and experimental characterization of non- Markovian anti-parity-time systems, Commun. Phys. 6, 308 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    X. D. Yang, X. Y. Long, R. Liu, K. Tang, Y. Zhai, X. F. Nie, T. Xin, J. Li, and D. W. Lu, Control-enhanced non-Markovian quantum metrology, Commun. Phys. 7, 282 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Y. X. Yang, S. Y. Bai, and J. H. An, Long-range quan- tum tunneling via matter waves, Commun. Phys. 8, 5 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    L. Xin, S. Xu, X. X. Yi, and H. Z. Shen, Tunable non- Markovian dynamics with a three-level atom mediated by the classical laser in a semi-infinite photonic waveg- uide, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053706 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    H. Z. Shen, D. X. Li, S. L. Su, Y. H. Zhou, and X. X. Yi, Exact non-Markovian dynamics of qubits coupled to two interacting environments, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033805 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Rivas, S

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt, and J. I. Cirac, As- sessing Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    Chru´ sci´ nski and S

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski and S. Maniscalco, Degree of Non- Markovianity of Quantum Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120404 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    J. F. Triana, A. F. Estrada, and L. A. Pach´ on, Ultrafast optimal sideband cooling under non-Markovian evolu- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 183602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    Cheng, W

    J. Cheng, W. Z. Zhang, L. Zhou, and W. P. Zhang, Preservation macroscopic entanglement of optomechan- 15 ical systems in non-Markovian environment, Sci. Rep. 6, 23678 (2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    H. Z. Shen, S. Xu, H. T. Cui, and X. X. Yi, Non- Markovian dynamics of a system of two-level atoms coupled to a structured environment, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    W. Z. Zhang, J. Cheng, W. D. Li, and L. Zhou, Optome- chanical cooling in the non-Markovian regime, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063853 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.