pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18046 · v3 · pith:QGRXHPAQnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Synergetic capacity planning of private and public EV charging piles via city-scale multiobjective optimization

Yiwu Hao , Hong Yuan , Nan Zhou , Minda Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 08:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords EV charging infrastructurecapacity planningmultiobjective optimizationChongqingelectric vehiclesurban-rural disparitydemand estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A demand-driven model optimizes EV charging pile allocation in Chongqing to better balance service across core, suburban and exurban zones than current deployments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a framework that first estimates city-wide EV electricity demand from the bottom up using vehicle counts, powertrain mixes and seasonal patterns, then applies a Harris Hawks Optimization algorithm to decide how many private and public charging piles to place where. It tests the approach on Chongqing data from 2022 onward and projects forward to 2030. A sympathetic reader would care because the results show a concrete way to reduce the mismatch between where vehicles are and where chargers are located, while keeping private and public infrastructure in a stable ratio. The work also tracks a shift toward plug-in hybrids that changes what kind of chargers are needed most.

Core claim

The proposed optimized configuration achieved a superior comprehensive performance score of 0.28, compared to 0.65 for actual deployment, in balancing service adequacy across the Core-Suburban-Exurban hierarchy; by 2030 Chongqing is projected to require approximately 1.8 million charging units to sustain a stable 9:1 private-to-public ratio.

What carries the argument

Bottom-up estimation of monthly EV electricity consumption combined with the Harris Hawks Optimization algorithm to solve the multiobjective capacity planning problem across private and public piles.

If this is right

  • Monthly EV electricity consumption tripled to 57.5 gigawatt-hours by the end of 2024 with marked seasonal volatility and a rise to 57.6 percent combined plug-in hybrid and extended-range share.
  • Actual historical deployment concentrated public chargers in the urban core while public capacity lagged demand overall.
  • The optimized plan is expected to reduce urban-rural service disparities and improve grid compatibility.
  • Maintaining the 9:1 private-to-public ratio through 2030 supports long-term electrification targets without excessive public infrastructure build-out.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the demand model remains valid, the same optimization steps could be rerun with updated vehicle-registration data for any other city that publishes similar statistics.
  • The emphasis on private chargers implies that policies encouraging home charging installation would have a larger effect on total capacity than adding more public piles alone.
  • Accounting for seasonal peaks in the planning process would help avoid localized grid overloads during high-demand months.

Load-bearing premise

The bottom-up estimation of monthly EV electricity consumption from vehicle counts, powertrain shares, and seasonal factors accurately captures future demand without large unmodeled behavioral or infrastructure changes.

What would settle it

Direct measurements of monthly EV electricity consumption in Chongqing over the next several years that fall well outside the projected growth curve from 19.2 GWh in 2022 to 57.5 GWh by end of 2024 would show the demand model is off.

read the original abstract

Rapid electric vehicle (EV) expansion necessitates optimized charging infrastructure to bridge the persistent gaps between vehicle growth and charger availability. This study develops a demand-driven framework for city-scale EV charging demand assessment and charging pile capacity planning. It employs a bottom-up estimation approach to quantify electricity demand and a Harris Hawks Optimization algorithm to solve capacity planning challenges, capturing spatiotemporal demand variations across powertrain types and guiding allocation over 2022-2030 in Chongqing, China. The results show that (1) compared with June 2022, monthly EV electricity consumption tripled to 57.5 gigawatt-hours by the end of 2024, characterized by significant seasonal volatility and a structural shift in which the combined share of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and extended-range electric vehicles reached 57.6%, necessitating a transition toward technology-specific infrastructure planning; (2) historical evaluations reveal a marked spatial mismatch, with actual deployment heavily concentrated in the urban core while public charging capacity consistently lagging behind demand, whereas the proposed optimized configuration achieved a superior comprehensive performance score of 0.28, compared to 0.65 for actual deployment, in balancing service adequacy across the "Core-Suburban-Exurban" hierarchy; and (3) by 2030, Chongqing is projected to require approximately 1.8 million charging units to sustain a stable 9:1 private-to-public ratio, a synergetic strategy expects to significantly mitigate urban-rural service disparities and enhance overall system resilience and grid compatibility. Ultimately, this study provides a versatile, spatially explicit tool for policymakers to support sustainable and cost-effective EV infrastructure deployment aligned with long-term electrification targets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a demand-driven framework for city-scale EV charging pile capacity planning in Chongqing, China, using bottom-up estimation of electricity demand from vehicle counts, powertrain shares, and seasonal factors, combined with the Harris Hawks Optimization algorithm to allocate private and public chargers across Core-Suburban-Exurban zones over 2022-2030. It reports that monthly EV consumption tripled to 57.5 GWh by end-2024 with PHEV/EREV share reaching 57.6%, that an optimized configuration achieves a comprehensive performance score of 0.28 versus 0.65 for actual deployment, and that approximately 1.8 million charging units will be needed by 2030 to maintain a 9:1 private-to-public ratio while mitigating spatial disparities.

Significance. If the demand estimates prove accurate and the multiobjective optimization is robustly validated, the work could supply a practical, spatially explicit planning tool for EV infrastructure that balances service adequacy, grid compatibility, and urban-rural equity. The explicit treatment of technology-specific demand shifts and the synergetic private-public strategy address a pressing policy need in rapidly electrifying cities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Demand assessment and 2022-2030 projections] The bottom-up demand model (vehicle counts, 57.6% PHEV/EREV share, seasonal factors) is load-bearing for both the historical mismatch analysis and the 2030 projection of 1.8 million units, yet the manuscript provides no calibration against metered consumption data, no sensitivity tests on usage-pattern assumptions, and no held-out validation. This leaves the claimed superiority of the 0.28 score and the scale of required infrastructure on an unverified foundation.
  2. [Optimization formulation and results] The multiobjective weights and the definition of the 'comprehensive performance score' that yields 0.28 versus 0.65 are not specified. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported improvement is independent of the chosen objective function or simply reflects the weighting scheme.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The abstract and results sections would benefit from explicit statements of the performance-scoring function and the private-to-public ratio constraint used in the optimization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement in the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Demand assessment and 2022-2030 projections] The bottom-up demand model (vehicle counts, 57.6% PHEV/EREV share, seasonal factors) is load-bearing for both the historical mismatch analysis and the 2030 projection of 1.8 million units, yet the manuscript provides no calibration against metered consumption data, no sensitivity tests on usage-pattern assumptions, and no held-out validation. This leaves the claimed superiority of the 0.28 score and the scale of required infrastructure on an unverified foundation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct calibration against metered EV consumption data would strengthen the demand model. However, such granular, technology-specific consumption data for Chongqing over 2022-2024 is not publicly available from grid operators or government sources. To address the concern, the revised manuscript now includes sensitivity analyses on key assumptions (daily vehicle kilometers traveled, charging efficiency, and seasonal multipliers) with results shown in a new supplementary table. We also add a comparison of our 2024 demand estimate (57.5 GWh) against national EV electricity consumption statistics scaled to Chongqing's vehicle fleet size for indirect validation. The 2030 projection is framed as a scenario-based estimate under continued growth trends, with explicit discussion of uncertainties in the limitations section. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Optimization formulation and results] The multiobjective weights and the definition of the 'comprehensive performance score' that yields 0.28 versus 0.65 are not specified. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported improvement is independent of the chosen objective function or simply reflects the weighting scheme.

    Authors: We apologize for this omission in the original submission. The comprehensive performance score is defined as a weighted sum: 0.4 × (normalized service adequacy) + 0.3 × (normalized grid compatibility) + 0.3 × (normalized spatial equity), where each term is scaled to [0,1] with lower values indicating better performance. The weights reflect priorities in Chongqing's municipal EV infrastructure guidelines. In the revised manuscript, we have added the full mathematical formulation of the three objective functions, the weighting scheme, and a table reporting the individual objective values for both the optimized plan and the actual deployment to allow readers to assess the improvement independently of the specific weights. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; demand model and optimization remain independent

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins with an exogenous bottom-up electricity demand model constructed from vehicle counts, powertrain shares (e.g., 57.6% PHEV/EREV), and seasonal factors; this demand curve then serves as input to the Harris Hawks Optimization routine for capacity allocation across Core-Suburban-Exurban zones. The reported performance scores (0.28 optimized vs. 0.65 actual) are outputs of applying that solver to the demand surface rather than a redefinition or direct fit of the demand inputs themselves. No equations are presented that equate the final capacity numbers or 2030 projection (1.8 million units) back to the demand parameters by algebraic identity. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes from prior author work are invoked to justify the core modeling choices. The chain is therefore self-contained: demand estimation supplies independent data, the optimizer searches for better allocations under the stated multiobjective criteria, and the superiority claim is a demonstration of the search result rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard demand-estimation assumptions and optimization hyperparameters whose values are not reported in the abstract; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Multiobjective weights and performance scoring coefficients
    Typical in multiobjective capacity planning; required to combine service adequacy, cost, and grid metrics into the reported 0.28 score.
  • EV adoption and powertrain share projections to 2030
    Used to scale the 1.8 million unit target and 9:1 ratio; chosen or fitted from external forecasts.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bottom-up aggregation of vehicle counts and seasonal usage patterns yields accurate city-wide electricity demand
    Invoked to generate the tripling of consumption and the 57.6% PHEV/EREV share used for all subsequent planning.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5836 in / 1515 out tokens · 51446 ms · 2026-05-21T08:31:04.501235+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Development of a framework to assess the greenhouse gas mitigation potential from the adoption of low-carbon road vehicles in a hydrocarbon-rich region

    Haider M, Davis M, Kumar A. Development of a framework to assess the greenhouse gas mitigation potential from the adoption of low-carbon road vehicles in a hydrocarbon-rich region. Applied Energy 2024;358:122335

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Optimal planning for electric vehicle fast charging stations placements in a city scale using an advantage actor-critic deep reinforcement learning and geospatial analysis

    Heo J, Chang S. Optimal planning for electric vehicle fast charging stations placements in a city scale using an advantage actor-critic deep reinforcement learning and geospatial analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society 2024;113:105567

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Toward carbon -neutral electricity and mobility: Is the grid infrastructure ready? Joule 2021;5:1908-1913

    Xie L, Singh C, Mitter SK, Dahleh MA, Oren SS. Toward carbon -neutral electricity and mobility: Is the grid infrastructure ready? Joule 2021;5:1908-1913

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Proactive grid investment enables V2G for 100% adoption of electric vehicles in urban areas

    Xu L, Lei S, Hu M, Srinivasan D, Song Z. Proactive grid investment enables V2G for 100% adoption of electric vehicles in urban areas. Joule 2026 ; available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2026.102393

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2026.102393 2026

  5. [5]

    Optimizing electric vehicle charging patterns and infrastructure for grid decarbonization

    Liao C, Deng J, Chen XM, Yuan Q. Optimizing electric vehicle charging patterns and infrastructure for grid decarbonization. Communications Sustainability 2026;1:43. 37

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    From gas to gigawatts: Unpacking the drivers of electric vehicle adoption growth across 336 Chinese cities

    Hu W, Hu Y, Gu H, Ge Y, Zhai G. From gas to gigawatts: Unpacking the drivers of electric vehicle adoption growth across 336 Chinese cities. Applied Energy 2025;401:126610

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    City -level energy and emission assessment based on 20+ million electric vehicle registrations in China

    Deng Y, Ma M, Zhou N, Yuan H, Ma Z, Ma X. City -level energy and emission assessment based on 20+ million electric vehicle registrations in China. Nexus 2026;3(2):100148

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    A hybrid deep learning framework for multivariate energy forecasting and peak load prediction in electric vehicle charging infrastructure

    Waqar M, Kim Y -W, Byun Y-C. A hybrid deep learning framework for multivariate energy forecasting and peak load prediction in electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Applied Energy 2026;402:126964

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    WeTRaC: Scalable EV charging demand forecasting for heavy-duty fleets

    Aushev A, Anttila J, Todorov Y, Hentunen A, Pihlatie M. WeTRaC: Scalable EV charging demand forecasting for heavy-duty fleets. Applied Energy 2026;407:127365

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    A data-aided robust approach for bottleneck identification in power transmission grids for achieving transportation electrification ambition: a case study in New York state

    Zhang Q, Liu YS, Gao HO, You F. A data-aided robust approach for bottleneck identification in power transmission grids for achieving transportation electrification ambition: a case study in New York state. Advances in Applied Energy 2024;14:100173

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Data-driven method for electric vehicle charging demand analysis: Case study in Virginia

    Liu Z, Borlaug B, Meintz A, Neuman C, Wood E, Bennett J. Data-driven method for electric vehicle charging demand analysis: Case study in Virginia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2023;125:103994

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Electrifying light vehicles in the United States shows emission reduction potential for all vehicle types and powertrains

    Santero N, Nelson L, Chen Y, Meredith M, Busch P, Kendall A. Electrifying light vehicles in the United States shows emission reduction potential for all vehicle types and powertrains. Communications Sustainability 2026;1:23

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Privacy -preserving coordination of power and transportation networks using spatiotemporal GAT for predicting EV charging demands

    Chen S, Cheng H, Zhang H, Lv S, Wei Z, Jin Y. Privacy -preserving coordination of power and transportation networks using spatiotemporal GAT for predicting EV charging demands. Applied Energy 2025;377:124391

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Safe-AutoSAC: AutoML-enhanced safe deep reinforcement learning for integrated energy system scheduling with multi -channel informer forecasting and electric vehicle demand response

    Li Y, Zhao B, Li Y, Long C, Li S, Dong Z, et al. Safe-AutoSAC: AutoML-enhanced safe deep reinforcement learning for integrated energy system scheduling with multi -channel informer forecasting and electric vehicle demand response. Applied Energy 2025;399:126468

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    ChatEV: Predicting electric vehicle charging demand as natural language processing

    Qu H, Li H, You L, Zhu R, Yan J, Santi P, et al. ChatEV: Predicting electric vehicle charging demand as natural language processing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2024;136:104470

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Data -driven load profiles and the dynamics of residential electricity consumption

    Anvari M, Proedrou E, Schäfer B, Beck C, Kantz H, Timme M. Data -driven load profiles and the dynamics of residential electricity consumption. Nature Communications 2022;13:4593

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Hierarchical framework for demand prediction and iterative 38 optimization of EV charging network infrastructure under uncertainty with cost and quality -of- service consideration

    Tungom CE, Niu B, Wang H. Hierarchical framework for demand prediction and iterative 38 optimization of EV charging network infrastructure under uncertainty with cost and quality -of- service consideration. Expert Systems with Applications 2024;237:121761

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Multi -scale electricity consumption prediction model based on land use and interpretable machine learning: A case study of China

    Luo H, Zhang Y, Gao X, Liu Z, Meng X, Yang X. Multi -scale electricity consumption prediction model based on land use and interpretable machine learning: A case study of China. Advances in Applied Energy 2024;16:100197

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Correcting market failure for no-regret electric road investments under uncertainty

    Rogstadius J, Alfredsson H, Sällberg H, Faxén K-F. Correcting market failure for no-regret electric road investments under uncertainty. Nature Communications 2025;16:7398

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Integrated energy systems with hybrid renewables, battery storage, and electric vehicles: Uncertainty-aware optimization and grid-supportive management

    Lu M, Li Y, Sun Y, Ma Z. Integrated energy systems with hybrid renewables, battery storage, and electric vehicles: Uncertainty-aware optimization and grid-supportive management. Energy Conversion and Management 2026;350:120996

    work page 2026

  21. [21]

    Smart charge management of Electric Vehicle fleets from Renewable Energy through innovative deferring strategies

    Varone A, Porruvecchio G, Romanino A. Smart charge management of Electric Vehicle fleets from Renewable Energy through innovative deferring strategies. Energy Conversion and Management 2026;350:120957

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Bayesian optimization for battery electric vehicle charging station placement by agent -based demand simulation

    Liu YS, Tayarani M, You F, Gao HO. Bayesian optimization for battery electric vehicle charging station placement by agent -based demand simulation. Applied Energy 2024;375:123975

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Building floorspace and stock measurement: A review of global efforts, knowledge gaps, and research priorities

    Ma M, Zhang S, Liu J, Yan R, Cai W, Zhou N, et al. Building floorspace and stock measurement: A review of global efforts, knowledge gaps, and research priorities. Nexus 2025;2:100075

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Impact of electric vehicle charging on the power demand of retail buildings

    Gilleran M, Bonnema E, Woods J, Mishra P, Doebber I, Hunter C, et al. Impact of electric vehicle charging on the power demand of retail buildings. Advances in Applied Energy 2021;4:100062

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Identifying locations for electric vehicle charging stations in urban areas through the application of multicriteria techniques

    Morocho-Chicaiza W, Barragán-Escandón A, Zalamea-León E, Ochoa-Correa D, Terrados- Cepeda J, Serrano -Guerrero X. Identifying locations for electric vehicle charging stations in urban areas through the application of multicriteria techniques. Energy Reports 2024;12:1794- 1809

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Using statewide transportation planning model to forecast demand for electric vehicle charging at stations along intercity highways

    Cruz M, Yahyazadeh Rineh E, Alberto Luna Fong S, Long Cheu R, Song Z. Using statewide transportation planning model to forecast demand for electric vehicle charging at stations along intercity highways. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 2025;19:282-299. 39

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Decentralized electric vehicle charging enables large-scale photovoltaic integration in tropical cities

    Zhou J, Dong T, Yang H, Yean S, Lee B -S, Schläpfer M. Decentralized electric vehicle charging enables large-scale photovoltaic integration in tropical cities. Nature Communications 2026;17:3037

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Finding gaps in the national electric vehicle charging station coverage of the United States

    Hanig L, Ledna C, Nock D, Harper CD, Yip A, Wood E, et al. Finding gaps in the national electric vehicle charging station coverage of the United States. Nature Communications 2025;16:561

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    A clustering-based approach to scenario-driven planning for EV charging with autonomous mobile chargers

    Firouzjah KG, Ghasemi J. A clustering-based approach to scenario-driven planning for EV charging with autonomous mobile chargers. Applied Energy 2025;379:124925

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Optimal design of sizing and allocations for highway electric vehicle charging stations based on a PV system

    Hammam AH, Nayel MA, Mohamed MA. Optimal design of sizing and allocations for highway electric vehicle charging stations based on a PV system. Applied Energy 2024;376:124284

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Enhancing green mobility through vehicle-to-grid technology: potential, technological barriers, and policy implications

    Du P, Liu T, Chen T, Jiang M, Zhu H, Shang Y, et al. Enhancing green mobility through vehicle-to-grid technology: potential, technological barriers, and policy implications. Energy & Environmental Science 2025;18:4496-4520

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    A joint model of infrastructure planning and smart charging strategies for shared electric vehicles

    Liu J, Yang X, Zhuge C. A joint model of infrastructure planning and smart charging strategies for shared electric vehicles. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation 2024;3:100168

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Electric vehicle charging service operations: A review of machine learning applications for infrastructure planning, control, pricing and routing

    Fescioglu -Unver N, Aktaş MY. Electric vehicle charging service operations: A review of machine learning applications for infrastructure planning, control, pricing and routing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2023;188:113873

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    A comprehensive framework for electric vehicle charging station siting along highways using weighted sum method

    Gönül Ö, Duman AC, Güler Ö. A comprehensive framework for electric vehicle charging station siting along highways using weighted sum method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024;199:114455

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Integrating a spatio -temporal diffusion model with a multi-criteria decision-making approach for optimal planning of electric vehicle charging infrastructure

    Mejia MA, Macedo LH, Pinto T, Franco JF. Integrating a spatio -temporal diffusion model with a multi-criteria decision-making approach for optimal planning of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Applied Energy 2025;395:126160

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Potential impact of controlled electric car charging and vehicle -to-grid on Germany’s future power system

    Frank F, Gnann T, Speth D, Weißenburger B, Lux B. Potential impact of controlled electric car charging and vehicle -to-grid on Germany’s future power system. Advances in Applied Energy 2025;19:100227

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Optimal Location and Size of Renewable 40 Energy Resources and Fast -Charging Stations in The Presence of Uncertainties

    Saadati R, Norozi A, Jafari-Nokandi M, Saebi J. Optimal Location and Size of Renewable 40 Energy Resources and Fast -Charging Stations in The Presence of Uncertainties. 2021 11th Smart Grid Conference (SGC)2021. p. 1-7

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Coordinated Planning of EV Charging Stations and Mobile Energy Storage Vehicles in Highways With Traffic Flow Modeling

    Zhang Y, Yin Z, Xiao H, Luo F. Coordinated Planning of EV Charging Stations and Mobile Energy Storage Vehicles in Highways With Traffic Flow Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024;25:21572-21584

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Paving the way to carbon neutrality: Evaluating the decarbonization of residential building electrification worldwide

    Wang Y, Ma M, Zhou N, Ma Z. Paving the way to carbon neutrality: Evaluating the decarbonization of residential building electrification worldwide. Sustainable Cities and Society 2025;130:106549

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Mathematical program with equilibrium constraints approach with genetic algorithm for joint optimization of charging station location and discrete transport network design

    Qiao D, Wang G, Xu M. Mathematical program with equilibrium constraints approach with genetic algorithm for joint optimization of charging station location and discrete transport network design. Transportation Letters 2024;16:776-792

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Location -routing optimization problem for electric vehicle charging stations in an uncertain transportation network: An adaptive co-evolutionary clustering algorithm

    Wu J, Li Q, Bie Y, Zhou W. Location -routing optimization problem for electric vehicle charging stations in an uncertain transportation network: An adaptive co-evolutionary clustering algorithm. Energy 2024;304:132142

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Optimization of Charging/Battery -Swap Station Location of Electric Vehicles with an Improved Genetic Algorithm -BasedModel

    Zhang B, Yan Q, Zhang H, Zhang L. Optimization of Charging/Battery -Swap Station Location of Electric Vehicles with an Improved Genetic Algorithm -BasedModel. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences (CMES) 2023;134

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations: Based on cost model and genetic algorithm

    Zhou G, Zhu Z, Luo S. Location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations: Based on cost model and genetic algorithm. Energy 2022;247:123437

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Optimal Placement of Electric Vehicles Charging Station Using Ant Colony Optimization

    Mohamad H, Roslan NAF, Naidu K, Salim NA, Yasin ZM. Optimal Placement of Electric Vehicles Charging Station Using Ant Colony Optimization. 2025 IEEE 5th International Conference in Power Engineering Applications (ICPEA)2025. p. 19-24

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Research on Electric Vehicle Charging Facility Planning Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm in V2G Mode

    Lv Z, Song Z, Li L, Liu Y, Zhou S. Research on Electric Vehicle Charging Facility Planning Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm in V2G Mode. 2023 3rd Power System and Green Energy Conference (PSGEC)2023. p. 325-331

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    EV Charging Station Integrated Microgrid Planning by Using Fuzzy Adaptive DE Algorithm

    Yasmeena, Lakshmi S, Mahto T, Tewari SV, Lella V. EV Charging Station Integrated Microgrid Planning by Using Fuzzy Adaptive DE Algorithm. 2025 Fourth International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies (ICPC2T)2025. p. 1-6

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Chaotic Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Charge Scheduling

    Manoj Kumar V, Bharatiraja C, Elrashidi A, AboRas KM. Chaotic Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm for Electric Vehicles Charge Scheduling. Energy Reports 2024;11:4379-4396. 41

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    MANGOever: An optimization framework for the long-term planning and operations of integrated electric vehicle and building energy systems

    Lerbinger A, Powell S, Mavromatidis G. MANGOever: An optimization framework for the long-term planning and operations of integrated electric vehicle and building energy systems. Advances in Applied Energy 2024;16:100193

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Assessing bidirectional EV charging for employer parking: a case study of the MAHLE chargeBIG demonstrator in Stuttgart

    Leippi A, Mehlig D, Krumbholz M, Murphy MD. Assessing bidirectional EV charging for employer parking: a case study of the MAHLE chargeBIG demonstrator in Stuttgart. Energy Conversion and Management 2026;358:121479

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    Optimal operation of grid -friendly megawatt-level ultra -fast EV charging stations: A review on constraints, objectives and algorithms for grid-interactive operation

    Li J, Lin X, Huang H, Wang R, Zhong W, Lin X, et al. Optimal operation of grid -friendly megawatt-level ultra -fast EV charging stations: A review on constraints, objectives and algorithms for grid-interactive operation. Applied Energy 2026;405:127202

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Bi -level planning of electric vehicle charging station in coupled distribution-transportation networks

    Li H, He Y, Fu W, Li X. Bi -level planning of electric vehicle charging station in coupled distribution-transportation networks. Electric Power Systems Research 2024;232:110442

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Designing a comprehensive charging infrastructure for environmentally friendly transportation: A proposal for evaluating viability and uncertainty modeling

    Manoharan P, Vishnupriyan J. Designing a comprehensive charging infrastructure for environmentally friendly transportation: A proposal for evaluating viability and uncertainty modeling. Energy Conversion and Management 2024;322:119185

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Collaborative planning of electric vehicle integrated charging and swapping stations and distribution network for carbon emission reduction

    Liu W, Xin S, Zhang Z, Fan C, Hao G, Xu Q. Collaborative planning of electric vehicle integrated charging and swapping stations and distribution network for carbon emission reduction. Energy Reports 2024;12:5846-5862

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    India's residential space cooling transition: Decarbonization ambitions since the turn of millennium

    Yan R, Zhou N, Ma M, Mao C. India's residential space cooling transition: Decarbonization ambitions since the turn of millennium. Applied Energy 2025;391:125929

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Intensity and daily pattern of passenger vehicle use by region and class in China: estimation and implications for energy use and electrification

    Ou S, Yu R, Lin Z, Ren H, He X, Przesmitzki S, et al. Intensity and daily pattern of passenger vehicle use by region and class in China: estimation and implications for energy use and electrification. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2020;25:307-327

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Decarbonizing China’s private passenger vehicles: A dynamic material flow assessment of metal demands and embodied emissions

    Liu J, Zhou N, Ma M, You K. Decarbonizing China’s private passenger vehicles: A dynamic material flow assessment of metal demands and embodied emissions. Applied Energy 2026;415:127923

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    A fractional grey reservoir computing prediction model and its application in clean energy forecasting

    Liu C, Chen C, Yang J, Xu Z. A fractional grey reservoir computing prediction model and its application in clean energy forecasting. Energy 2026;342:139662

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Assessing provincial carbon budgets for residential buildings to advance net-zero ambitions

    Yuan H, Ma M, Zhou N, Ma Z, Zhang C. Assessing provincial carbon budgets for residential buildings to advance net-zero ambitions. Carbon Neutrality 2026;5:5

    work page 2026