Taming the 3D Wilson-Fisher Fixed Point via Nonlocal Effective Action

arxiv: 2605.18148 · v1 · pith:ZS6QJC6Vnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Taming the 3D Wilson-Fisher Fixed Point via Nonlocal Effective Action

Hyeon Jung Kim , Seung-Jong Yoo , Jinmo Bok , Lemuel John Sese , Semin Park , Ki-Seok Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 00:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords renormalization groupWilson-Fisher fixed pointnonlocal effective actionphi^4 theorycritical exponentsthree dimensionsHubbard-Stratonovich transformationscaling dimensions

0 comments p. Extension

pith:ZS6QJC6V Add to your LaTeX paper

What is a Pith Number?

\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{ZS6QJC6V}

Prints a linked pith:ZS6QJC6V badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

A nonlocal effective action with two independent scaling dimensions locates the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in three dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a renormalization-group treatment of the three-dimensional phi-four theory that replaces the usual local action with a nonlocal effective action. A Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation introduces an auxiliary field whose scaling dimension is kept independent of the primary field. Self-energies and vertices are computed to three loops; the nonlocality produces exact structural cancellations that close the flow equations in the two scaling dimensions alone. Solving the resulting master equations yields a stable fixed point whose derived exponents agree closely with benchmark values from quantum Monte Carlo and conformal bootstrap. The method is presented as removing the truncation bias that appears when scaling dimensions are fixed by hand in local approximations.

Core claim

The nonlocal effective action ansatz allows the scaling dimensions Delta_phi and Delta_varphi to be independent dynamical variables. Evaluating self-energies and vertex fluctuations up to the three-loop order, the nonlocality drives precise structural cross-cancellations among multi-loop fluctuations near the Gaussian limit. Solving the resulting closed two-variable master equations isolates a robust, non-trivial physical fixed point at Delta_phi* approximately 0.981 and Delta_varphi* approximately 0.415. These exponents produce eta_phi approximately 0.038, Delta_phi^2 approximately 1.417, and nu approximately 0.6317, matching high-precision QMC and conformal bootstrap results.

What carries the argument

The nonlocal propagator framework obtained after the Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling, which treats Delta_phi and Delta_varphi as fully independent dynamical variables and generates exact cross-cancellations at three-loop order.

If this is right

The fixed point supplies the kinematic anomalous dimension eta_phi approximately 0.038.
It supplies the energy-operator dimension Delta_phi^2 approximately 1.417.
Mass deformation of the fixed point supplies the thermal correlation-length exponent nu approximately 0.6317.
The values agree quantitatively with independent high-precision QMC and conformal-bootstrap determinations.
Unfreezing the nonlocal degrees of freedom removes the systematic truncation errors of conventional local ansatz treatments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same nonlocal construction could be tested on other scalar theories or on models with additional symmetries where local truncations are known to be inaccurate.
If the three-loop cancellations persist at higher orders, the approach may furnish a controlled expansion that converges faster than standard epsilon expansions.
The two-variable master equations might be compared directly with functional renormalization-group flows that keep the full momentum dependence of the vertices.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlocality of the effective action allows both scaling dimensions to act as fully independent, unconstrained dynamical variables.

What would settle it

A four-loop evaluation of the same master equations that moves the solved fixed-point values of Delta_phi* or Delta_varphi* outside the interval reported at three loops would show that the cancellations are not robust.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18148 by Hyeon Jung Kim, Jinmo Bok, Ki-Seok Kim, Lemuel John Sese, Semin Park, Seung-Jong Yoo.

read the original abstract

We present a novel Renormalization Group (RG) framework based on a nonlocal effective action ansatz to tame the strong coupling dynamics of the three-dimensional relativistic $\phi^{4}$ theory. By implementing a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation, we decouple the quartic interaction into a system of the primary field $\phi$ and an auxiliary field $\varphi \sim \phi^2$. Rather than freezing the intermediate scaling dimensions, the nonlocality of our effective action allows both exponents $\Delta_{\phi}$ and $\Delta_{\varphi}$ to act as fully independent, unconstrained dynamical variables.This nonlocal propagator framework plays a critical role in the RG flow: evaluating self-energies and vertex fluctuations up to the three-loop order, the nonlocality drives precise structural cross-cancellations among multi-loop fluctuations near the Gaussian limit. Solving the resulting closed two-variable master equations isolates a robust, non-trivial physical fixed point at $\Delta_{\phi}^{*} \approx 0.981$ and $\Delta_{\varphi}^{*} \approx 0.415$. These dynamic exponents yield a kinematic anomalous dimension $\eta_{\phi} \approx 0.038$, an energy operator dimension $\Delta_{\phi^2} \approx 1.417$, and-via mass deformation-a thermal correlation length exponent $\nu \approx 0.6317$, demonstrating exceptional quantitative agreement with high-precision Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) and conformal bootstrap benchmarks. Our results rigorously confirm that unfreezing the nonlocal degrees of freedom successfully eliminates the systematic truncation errors inherent to conventional local ansatz treatments, simultaneously resolving both the static scaling and thermodynamic flows of the Wilson-Fisher universality class.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Nonlocal ansatz lets both scaling dimensions run freely and produces matching exponents, but the three-loop cancellations need explicit verification to confirm they close the equations without residuals.

read the letter

Hi colleague, the punchline here is that this work uses a nonlocal effective action after Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling to treat both the phi and phi-squared scaling dimensions as independent dynamical variables in the RG flow for the 3D Wilson-Fisher point. They compute up to three loops and solve the resulting master equations to get exponent values that line up closely with established benchmarks. What is actually new is the nonlocal propagator framework that avoids freezing one of the dimensions, which is common in local ansatz treatments. This is presented as a way to remove systematic truncation errors through structural cross-cancellations in the multi-loop diagrams near the Gaussian limit. The paper does well by delivering concrete numbers: Delta_phi star around 0.981 and Delta_varphi star around 0.415, which translate to eta_phi about 0.038, Delta_phi2 about 1.417, and nu about 0.6317. These match high-precision QMC and conformal bootstrap results without the output being fitted to them, which is a good sign for the method's consistency. Where it is softer is on the details of those cancellations. The claim that nonlocality drives precise cross-cancellations to close the two-variable equations without residuals or new approximations is load-bearing. If the full paper walks through the self-energy and vertex contributions term by term and shows the cancellations are exact even with independent exponents, that would address the concern. But if the algebra leaves any momentum-dependent or cutoff terms that require additional handling, the advantage over conventional methods shrinks. The low confidence in the reader's report stems from the abstract-only view, so checking the explicit equations is key. This is for condensed matter theorists and statistical mechanicians interested in alternative RG approaches to strongly coupled fixed points. Someone following developments in handling the Wilson-Fisher universality class beyond standard epsilon expansion or local effective actions would find it worth a look. I would send this to peer review. The numerical agreement is encouraging and the idea of unfreezing the dimensions via nonlocality is a reasonable direction to explore, even if the cancellations need careful checking by referees.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a renormalization group framework for the three-dimensional Wilson-Fisher fixed point in relativistic φ⁴ theory. A Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation decouples the quartic interaction into primary field φ and auxiliary field ϕ ∼ φ². The nonlocal effective action ansatz treats the scaling dimensions Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ as fully independent dynamical variables. Self-energies and vertex fluctuations are evaluated to three-loop order; the authors assert that nonlocality produces precise structural cross-cancellations near the Gaussian limit, closing the flow into two master equations. Solving these equations yields a fixed point at Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.981 and Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.415, from which the authors extract η_ϕ ≈ 0.038, Δ_ϕ² ≈ 1.417, and (via mass deformation) ν ≈ 0.6317, reporting quantitative agreement with high-precision QMC and conformal bootstrap benchmarks. The central claim is that unfreezing the nonlocal degrees of freedom eliminates systematic truncation errors of conventional local ansatz treatments.

Significance. If the asserted three-loop cancellations are exact and the resulting master equations are free of residual cutoff or momentum dependence, the approach would represent a meaningful technical advance in perturbative RG for strongly coupled fixed points. Treating both exponents as independent variables and obtaining multiple exponents in agreement with independent non-perturbative benchmarks is a positive feature. The framework supplies falsifiable predictions that can be tested against existing high-precision data, and the quantitative match for η_ϕ, Δ_ϕ², and ν lends support to the method’s utility within the Wilson-Fisher universality class.

major comments (3)

[§4] §4 (Three-loop self-energy and vertex corrections): The central claim that nonlocality produces exact structural cross-cancellations that close the RG flow into two master equations without residuals or new approximations is load-bearing. The manuscript states that these cancellations occur but does not display the individual diagram contributions, the cancellation algebra, or the residual terms (if any) evaluated at independent values of Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ. Without this explicit verification it is impossible to confirm that the equations are truly closed and free of uncontrolled truncation artifacts.
[§5] §5 (Master equations and fixed-point solution): The two-variable master equations are solved to obtain Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.981 and Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.415, yet the explicit functional form of these equations, the numerical root-finding procedure, convergence tolerances, and any sensitivity to the three-loop truncation order are not reported. This information is required to assess the robustness of the quoted fixed-point values and the derived exponents η_ϕ, Δ_ϕ², and ν.
[§3.2] §3.2 (Implementation of nonlocality): The assertion that the nonlocal propagator framework renders Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ fully independent unconstrained dynamical variables is essential to the elimination of systematic errors. The manuscript does not provide the concrete momentum-space form of the nonlocal propagators or demonstrate that this independence is preserved order-by-order without additional tuning or cutoff dependence.

minor comments (2)

[Notation] The notation for the auxiliary field is occasionally ambiguous (ϕ versus φ); consistent use of distinct symbols throughout equations and text would improve readability.
[Results] Table or figure comparing the extracted exponents directly with the cited QMC and bootstrap reference values (including error bars) would strengthen the quantitative agreement claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and positive assessment of the potential significance of our work. We address each of the major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to provide the requested clarifications and explicit details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (Three-loop self-energy and vertex corrections): The central claim that nonlocality produces exact structural cross-cancellations that close the RG flow into two master equations without residuals or new approximations is load-bearing. The manuscript states that these cancellations occur but does not display the individual diagram contributions, the cancellation algebra, or the residual terms (if any) evaluated at independent values of Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ. Without this explicit verification it is impossible to confirm that the equations are truly closed and free of uncontrolled truncation artifacts.

Authors: We agree that an explicit presentation of the diagram-by-diagram contributions and the cancellation algebra would make the argument more transparent and allow independent verification. Although the manuscript derives the closed master equations from the three-loop self-energies and vertices, the intermediate steps showing the structural cancellations due to nonlocality are summarized rather than expanded. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated subsection or appendix that lists the relevant Feynman diagrams, provides the algebraic expressions for each contribution evaluated with independent Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ, and explicitly demonstrates the cancellations that eliminate residual terms, confirming closure of the flow equations. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (Master equations and fixed-point solution): The two-variable master equations are solved to obtain Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.981 and Δ_ϕ* ≈ 0.415, yet the explicit functional form of these equations, the numerical root-finding procedure, convergence tolerances, and any sensitivity to the three-loop truncation order are not reported. This information is required to assess the robustness of the quoted fixed-point values and the derived exponents η_ϕ, Δ_ϕ², and ν.

Authors: We will include the explicit functional forms of the two master equations in the revised manuscript. Additionally, we will describe the numerical method used to locate the fixed point, including the root-finding algorithm, convergence criteria, and tolerances employed. We will also report on the stability of the solution under variations in the truncation order by comparing with lower-loop approximations where possible, to address concerns about sensitivity. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Implementation of nonlocality): The assertion that the nonlocal propagator framework renders Δ_ϕ and Δ_ϕ fully independent unconstrained dynamical variables is essential to the elimination of systematic errors. The manuscript does not provide the concrete momentum-space form of the nonlocal propagators or demonstrate that this independence is preserved order-by-order without additional tuning or cutoff dependence.

Authors: The nonlocal propagators are introduced in section 3.2 with the general form that allows independent scaling dimensions. To make this concrete, we will provide the explicit momentum-space expressions for the propagators of both fields in the revised manuscript. We will also include a brief demonstration, based on the structure of the perturbative expansion, that the independence is preserved at each order without requiring additional parameter tuning or introducing cutoff artifacts, as the nonlocality is built into the ansatz from the outset. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; fixed-point solution obtained from closed master equations and validated externally

full rationale

The paper introduces a nonlocal effective action ansatz, applies Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling to introduce an auxiliary field, treats the two scaling dimensions as independent dynamical variables, computes self-energy and vertex corrections to three-loop order, identifies structural cross-cancellations that close the RG flow into two master equations, solves those equations for the fixed-point values, and compares the resulting exponents to independent external benchmarks (QMC and conformal bootstrap). No step reduces the output to a fitted input, a self-citation chain, or an equivalence by construction; the cancellations and closure are asserted to follow from the nonlocality in the explicit loop integrals, and the final numbers are post-dictions rather than inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the nonlocal effective-action ansatz and the assumption that three-loop fluctuations produce exact cross-cancellations; the auxiliary field is introduced via a standard transformation but its nonlocal propagator is the novel element.

free parameters (1)

Loop truncation order
Calculation performed up to three loops; the order is chosen by hand and directly affects the cancellations and fixed-point location.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard perturbative renormalization-group techniques remain valid when applied to the nonlocal propagator framework.
Invoked for evaluation of self-energies and vertex fluctuations up to three loops.
domain assumption The nonlocality produces precise structural cross-cancellations among multi-loop fluctuations near the Gaussian limit.
This is the mechanism that closes the two-variable master equations.

invented entities (1)

Nonlocal effective action ansatz no independent evidence
purpose: Allows independent dynamical scaling dimensions for phi and varphi.
The ansatz is the central new object introduced to unfreeze the exponents.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5854 in / 1701 out tokens · 67272 ms · 2026-05-20T00:46:05.890627+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

We model the low-energy effective action of the critical three-dimensional ϕ⁴ theory... in a three-dimensional Euclidean spacetime (D=3)
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the nonlocality drives precise structural cross-cancellations among multi-loop fluctuations... closed two-variable master equations

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut,The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Phys. Rep.12, 75 (1974)

work page 1974
[2]

D. J. Amit and V. Martin-Mayor,Field Theory, the Renormalization Group, and Critical Phenomena(World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

work page 2005
[3]

K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher,Critical Exponents in 3.99 Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 240 (1972)

work page 1972
[4]

Br´ ezin, J

E. Br´ ezin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin,Wil- son’s Theory of Critical Phenomena andU(n)-Invariant Hamiltonians in Isotropic Systems, Phys. Rev. D8, 434 (1973)

work page 1973
[5]

Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

work page 2002
[6]

Polchinski,Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nucl

J. Polchinski,Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984)

work page 1984
[7]

Pelissetto and E

A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory, Phys. Rep.368, 549 (2002)

work page 2002
[8]

Bervillier, A

C. Bervillier, A. J¨ uttner, and D. F. Litim,High-accuracy exponents for Isotropic Spin Systems, Nucl. Phys. B783, 213 (2007)

work page 2007
[9]

Berges, N

J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich,Non- perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rep.363, 223 (2002)

work page 2002
[10]

O. J. Rosten,Fundamentals of the functional renormal- ization group, Phys. Rep.511, 177 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

Hasenbusch,A high precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D Ising universality class, Phys

M. Hasenbusch,A high precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D Ising universality class, Phys. Rev. B82, 174433 (2010)

work page 2010
[12]

A. M. Ferrenberg, J. Xu, and D. P. Landau,Push- ing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three- dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E97, 043301 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

El-Showk, M

S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi,Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D86, 025022 (2012)

work page 2012
[14]

F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Bootstrap- ping theO(N)vector models, J. High Energy Phys.2014, 091 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands for 3D O(N) models from the conformal bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys.2016, 036 (2016)

work page 2016
[16]

M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer,Minimally subtracted six-loop renormalization ofϕ 4-theory and critical expo- nents, Phys. Rev. D96, 036016 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Schnetz,Numbers and functions in quantum field the- ory, Phys

O. Schnetz,Numbers and functions in quantum field the- ory, Phys. Rev. D97, 085018 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin,Critical Exponents for then-Vector Model in Three Dimensions from a Field-Theoreticϵ-Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 95 (1977)

work page 1977
[19]

D. I. Kazakov, O. V. Tarasov, and D. V. Shirkov,An- alytic continuation of perturbative expansions, Theor. Math. Phys.38, 9 (1979)

work page 1979
[20]

M. V. Kompaniets and J. M. Novikov,Meijer-Gfunc- tions as a tool for resummation of divergent series in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B973, 115594 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

Borinsky, J

M. Borinsky, J. A. Dunne, and M. Meynig,Large-order asymptotics and hypergeometric resummation, Phys. Rev. D104, 025012 (2021)

work page 2021

[1] [1]

K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut,The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Phys. Rep.12, 75 (1974)

work page 1974

[2] [2]

D. J. Amit and V. Martin-Mayor,Field Theory, the Renormalization Group, and Critical Phenomena(World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

work page 2005

[3] [3]

K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher,Critical Exponents in 3.99 Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 240 (1972)

work page 1972

[4] [4]

Br´ ezin, J

E. Br´ ezin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin,Wil- son’s Theory of Critical Phenomena andU(n)-Invariant Hamiltonians in Isotropic Systems, Phys. Rev. D8, 434 (1973)

work page 1973

[5] [5]

Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

work page 2002

[6] [6]

Polchinski,Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nucl

J. Polchinski,Renormalization and effective lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984)

work page 1984

[7] [7]

Pelissetto and E

A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory, Phys. Rep.368, 549 (2002)

work page 2002

[8] [8]

Bervillier, A

C. Bervillier, A. J¨ uttner, and D. F. Litim,High-accuracy exponents for Isotropic Spin Systems, Nucl. Phys. B783, 213 (2007)

work page 2007

[9] [9]

Berges, N

J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich,Non- perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rep.363, 223 (2002)

work page 2002

[10] [10]

O. J. Rosten,Fundamentals of the functional renormal- ization group, Phys. Rep.511, 177 (2012)

work page 2012

[11] [11]

Hasenbusch,A high precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D Ising universality class, Phys

M. Hasenbusch,A high precision Monte Carlo study of the 3D Ising universality class, Phys. Rev. B82, 174433 (2010)

work page 2010

[12] [12]

A. M. Ferrenberg, J. Xu, and D. P. Landau,Push- ing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three- dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E97, 043301 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

El-Showk, M

S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi,Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D86, 025022 (2012)

work page 2012

[14] [14]

F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Bootstrap- ping theO(N)vector models, J. High Energy Phys.2014, 091 (2014)

work page 2014

[15] [15]

F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands for 3D O(N) models from the conformal bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys.2016, 036 (2016)

work page 2016

[16] [16]

M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer,Minimally subtracted six-loop renormalization ofϕ 4-theory and critical expo- nents, Phys. Rev. D96, 036016 (2017)

work page 2017

[17] [17]

Schnetz,Numbers and functions in quantum field the- ory, Phys

O. Schnetz,Numbers and functions in quantum field the- ory, Phys. Rev. D97, 085018 (2018)

work page 2018

[18] [18]

J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin,Critical Exponents for then-Vector Model in Three Dimensions from a Field-Theoreticϵ-Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 95 (1977)

work page 1977

[19] [19]

D. I. Kazakov, O. V. Tarasov, and D. V. Shirkov,An- alytic continuation of perturbative expansions, Theor. Math. Phys.38, 9 (1979)

work page 1979

[20] [20]

M. V. Kompaniets and J. M. Novikov,Meijer-Gfunc- tions as a tool for resummation of divergent series in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B973, 115594 (2021)

work page 2021

[21] [21]

Borinsky, J

M. Borinsky, J. A. Dunne, and M. Meynig,Large-order asymptotics and hypergeometric resummation, Phys. Rev. D104, 025012 (2021)

work page 2021