pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18503 · v1 · pith:SYJH5X4Znew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.NI

Collaborative Air-Ground Sensing, Communication, Computing, Storage, and Intelligence for Low-Altitude Economy

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords low-altitude economyair-ground collaborationSCCSI orchestrationmission-centric designresource coordinationcyber-physical systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Low-altitude economy missions require air-ground collaboration across sensing, communication, computing, storage, and intelligence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that low-altitude economy applications are mission-centric and impose stringent safety and compliance constraints that communication-centric designs alone cannot meet. This makes coordinated air-ground infrastructure indispensable for fulfilling such missions through integrated orchestration of resources. A sympathetic reader would care because the work provides a framework that links application scenarios to resource coupling, architecture, and optimization toolboxes for handling mobility and uncertainty in real deployments. The authors review enabling technologies while stressing end-to-end tradeoffs and illustrate the approach with use cases and open challenges.

Core claim

Low-altitude economy transforms low-altitude airspace into new cyber-physical infrastructure. LAE is mission-centric with diverse requirements such as stringent safety and compliance constraints that cannot be effectively addressed with a communication-centric design alone. Air-ground collaboration is therefore indispensable, and only through effectively coordinating air-ground infrastructure and resources can LAE missions be fulfilled. This calls for task-driven, closed-loop, multi-resource orchestration of Sensing, Communication, Computing, Storage, and Intelligence where key decisions must be co-designed under mobility and uncertainty. The paper presents a framework connecting LAE to a

What carries the argument

Air-ground collaborative architecture that supports task-driven co-optimization of SCCSI resources through a requirement-resource coupling matrix and online decision-making toolboxes.

If this is right

  • LAE missions are fulfilled only when air-ground infrastructure and resources are coordinated effectively.
  • Task-driven closed-loop orchestration of SCCSI resources is required to handle mobility and uncertainty.
  • Enabling technologies must be evaluated with explicit attention to their coupling and end-to-end tradeoffs.
  • Practical designs for use cases emerge by translating requirements into optimization through the proposed framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Regulatory bodies for low-altitude airspace may need new standards that explicitly require multi-resource coordination rather than communication performance alone.
  • The same coupling-matrix approach could be tested in adjacent domains such as maritime or space operations with similar safety constraints.
  • Online decision algorithms developed here could be adapted to improve resilience in other mobile cyber-physical systems facing uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

That communication-centric designs alone are insufficient to address the safety and compliance constraints of LAE missions, making air-ground coordination necessary.

What would settle it

A demonstration that a purely communication-based system can complete a representative LAE mission, such as drone delivery or inspection, while satisfying all safety regulations and compliance rules without any air-ground resource coordination.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18503 by Junhui Gao, Xianhao Chen, Yanan Ma, Yiqin Deng, Yuguang Fang, Zihan Fang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A motivating example of a mission-driven LAE task: high-precision UAV navigation in GNSS-denied urban canyons via air– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Scenario illustration of collaborative air-ground sensing, communication, computing, storage, and intelligence in the low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Air-Ground Sensing Coordination: Simultaneous Localization and Mapping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Air-Ground Communication Coordination: Coverage & Security [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Air-Ground Computing Coordination: multi-access edge computing continuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Air-Ground Storage Coordination: edge caching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Air-Ground Intelligence Coordination: AirComp-based Federated Learning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A multi-layered taxonomy of enabling technologies for the AG-SCCSI framework, illustrating the synergistic evolution from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Low-altitude economy (LAE) is transforming low-altitude airspace into a new cyber-physical infrastructure. Although air-ground communications have been widely studied, LAE is fundamentally different in the sense that it is mission-centric with diverse requirements, such as stringent safety and compliance constraints not be effectively addressed with a communication-centric design alone, which makes air-ground collaboration indispensable: Only through effectively coordinating air-ground infrastructure and resources can LAE missions be fulfilled. Consequently, LAE calls for task-driven, closed-loop, multi-resource orchestration of Sensing, Communication, Computing, Storage, and Intelligence (SCCSI), where key decisions must be co-designed under mobility and uncertainty. In this paper, we first present a novel framework that connects (i) LAE scenarios and a requirement--resource coupling matrix, (ii) an air--ground collaborative architecture, and (iii) methodological toolboxes for SCCSI co-optimization and online decision-making. We then systematically review enabling technologies for collaborative SCCSI resources and capabilities, emphasizing their coupling and end-to-end tradeoffs. Finally, we summarize testbeds, datasets, and evaluation metrics, and provide representative use cases to illustrate how the proposed framework translates application requirements into practical task-driven optimization designs, together with open challenges and a roadmap toward scalable and trustworthy LAE deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a framework for collaborative air-ground Sensing, Communication, Computing, Storage, and Intelligence (SCCSI) tailored to the Low-Altitude Economy (LAE). It posits that LAE's mission-centric requirements, including stringent safety and compliance constraints, cannot be met by communication-centric designs alone, thus requiring integrated air-ground resource orchestration. The framework encompasses LAE scenarios linked via a requirement-resource coupling matrix, a collaborative architecture, methodological toolboxes for co-optimization and decision-making under mobility and uncertainty, a review of enabling technologies with emphasis on couplings and tradeoffs, and illustrative use cases along with testbeds, datasets, metrics, open challenges, and a deployment roadmap.

Significance. If the proposed framework holds, it offers a structured way to approach multi-resource integration in emerging LAE applications, potentially facilitating better handling of diverse mission requirements through closed-loop orchestration. The review of technologies and use-case illustrations provide a foundation for researchers to build upon, highlighting end-to-end tradeoffs. This synthesis could be significant for advancing beyond siloed studies in communications, sensing, and computing for aerial systems.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and introduction: The central claim that communication-centric designs alone cannot address LAE safety and compliance constraints (making air-ground SCCSI orchestration indispensable) is asserted qualitatively but without concrete references to prior studies, failure cases, or specific technical limitations of existing communication-only approaches; this weakens the motivation for the proposed framework.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and introduction: The central claim that communication-centric designs alone cannot address LAE safety and compliance constraints (making air-ground SCCSI orchestration indispensable) is asserted qualitatively but without concrete references to prior studies, failure cases, or specific technical limitations of existing communication-only approaches; this weakens the motivation for the proposed framework.

    Authors: We agree that the motivation would be strengthened by explicit supporting references and examples. While the claim reflects established challenges in the LAE literature, we will revise the introduction to incorporate concrete citations to prior studies. These will include works documenting latency-induced safety incidents in UAV operations and regulatory analyses showing compliance shortfalls when only communication resources are considered. The revisions will be added without changing the overall framework or claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the high-level framework

full rationale

The paper is a framework and review contribution rather than a theorem, derivation, or quantitative study. It presents a high-level organizational structure connecting LAE scenarios, a requirement-resource matrix, collaborative architecture, and methodological toolboxes, along with reviews of enabling technologies and use cases. The central claim—that communication-centric designs alone cannot meet LAE safety and compliance constraints, making air-ground SCCSI orchestration indispensable—is a motivating perspective stated in the abstract and architecture sections, without any equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-referential reductions that could be circular by construction. No load-bearing steps reduce to inputs via self-definition, self-citation chains, or ansatz smuggling, rendering the analysis self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that communication-centric designs cannot meet LAE safety constraints, with no free parameters, new entities, or additional axioms introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Air-ground collaboration is indispensable because communication-centric designs alone cannot address stringent safety and compliance constraints in LAE missions.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the need for multi-resource SCCSI orchestration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5780 in / 1197 out tokens · 47556 ms · 2026-05-20T08:18:40.597479+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Develop the Low-Altitude Economy

    2024. Develop the Low-Altitude Economy. The Chief Executive’s 2024 Policy Address. https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2024/en/p81.html Accessed Oct. 2024

  2. [2]

    Resources on the Move for Smart City: A Disruptive Perspective on the Grand Convergence of SCCSI

    2025. Resources on the Move for Smart City: A Disruptive Perspective on the Grand Convergence of SCCSI. IEEE Communications Magazine (2025). doi:10.1109/MCOM.001.2400084 Early Access

  3. [3]

    Aly Sabri Abdalla and Vuk Marojevic. 2026. Next Generation Intelligent Low-Altitude Economy Deployments: The O-RAN Perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.00257 (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.00257

  4. [4]

    Muhammad Adil, Houbing Song, Mian Ahmad Jan, Muhammad Khurram Khan, Xiangjian He, Ahmed Farouk, and Zhanpeng Jin. 2024. UA V- Assisted IoT Applications, QoS Requirements and Challenges with Future Research Directions. ACM Computing Surveys 56, 10 (May 2024), 1–35

  5. [5]

    Palaniappan, Prasad Calyam, K

    Tazeem Ahmad, Alicia Esquivel Morel, Nuo Cheng, K. Palaniappan, Prasad Calyam, K. Sun, and Jianli Pan. 2026. Future UA V/Drone Systems for Intelligent Active Surveillance and Monitoring. ACM Computing Surveys 58, 2, Article 35 (2026), 37 pages. doi:10.1145/3760389

  6. [6]

    Mansoor Ahmed, Wali Ullah Khan, Afrasyab Khan Soofi, and Zhu Han. 2025. A Comprehensive Survey on RIS-Enhanced Physical Layer Security in UA V-Assisted Networks.IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2025). To be published. Manuscript submitted to ACM 32 Y. Deng et al

  7. [7]

    Haithem Alaya, Asma Ben Letaifa, and Abderrezak Rachedi. 2025. State of the Art and Taxonomy Survey on Federated Learning and Blockchain Integration in UA V Applications. Journal of Supercomputing 81 (2025), 655. doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07124-x

  8. [8]

    Omid Asghari, Naghmeh Ivaki, and Henrique Madeira. 2025. UA V Operations Safety Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.ACM Computing Surveys 57, 10 (Oct. 2025), 1–37

  9. [9]

    Murat Bakirci. 2024. Utilizing YOLOv8 for Enhanced Traffic Monitoring in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Applications. Digital Signal Processing 152 (Sept. 2024), 104594

  10. [10]

    Asrar Ahmed Baktayan, Ammar Thabit Zahary, Axel Sikora, and Dominik Welte. 2024. Computational Offloading into UA V Swarm Networks: A Systematic Literature Review. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2024, 1 (2024), 69

  11. [11]

    Yanis Bardes, Hassan Soubra, Zineb Noumir, and Amar Ramdane-Cherif. 2025. Federated Learning for UA V Perception Task: A Survey. TechRxiv (June 2025). doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174906148.89641328/v1

  12. [12]

    Lingyi Cai, Jiacheng Wang, Ruichen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Tao Jiang, Dusit Niyato, Xianbin Wang, Abbas Jamalipour, and Xuemin Shen. 2025. Secure Physical Layer Communications for Low-Altitude Economy Networking: A Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09153

  13. [13]

    Hengsheng Chen, Yuan-Chyuan Andy Lin, Mingjian Fu, Lina Yao, and Quan Z. Sheng. 2026. A Survey on Reinforcement Learning Methods for UA V Systems.ACM Computing Surveys 58, 4, Article 103 (2026), 37 pages. doi:10.1145/3769426

  14. [14]

    Andrew Zhang

    Jinsong Chen, Kai Wu, Jinping Niu, Yanyan Li, Pengfei Xu, and J. Andrew Zhang. 2025. Spectral and Energy Efficient Waveform Design for RIS-Assisted ISAC. IEEE Transactions on Communications 73, 1 (Jan. 2025), 158–172

  15. [15]

    Xianhao Chen, Yiqin Deng, Haichuan Ding, Guandong Qu, Haixia Zhang, Pan Li, and Yuguang Fang. 2024. Vehicle as a Service (VaaS): Leverage Vehicles to Build Service Networks and Capabilities for Smart Cities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 42, 3 (2024), 2048–2081

  16. [16]

    Youssra Cheriguene, Wael Jaafar, Halim Yanikomeroglu, and Chaker Abdelaziz Kerrache. 2023. Data-Efficient Energy-Aware Participant Selection for UA V-Enabled Federated Learning. In 2023 IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). IEEE, 1–7

  17. [17]

    Hyunsang Cho, Seonghoon Yoo, Bang Chul Jung, and Joonhyuk Kang. 2024. Enhancing Battlefield Awareness: An Aerial RIS-Assisted ISAC System with Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) . 469–474

  18. [18]

    Yiqin Deng, Zhengru Fang, Senkang Hu, Yanan Ma, Xiaoyu Guo, Haixia Zhang, and Yuguang Fang. 2026. UA V-Enabled Computing Power Networks: Design and Performance Analysis under Energy Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (Jan. 2026). doi:10.1109/TMC. 2026.3655118 Early Access

  19. [19]

    Yiqin Deng, Zhengru Fang, Senkang Hu, Yanan Ma, Haixia Zhang, and Yuguang Fang. 2025. UA V-Enabled Computing Power Networks: Task Completion Probability Analysis. In Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) . Taipei, Taiwan, Dec. 8–12, 2025

  20. [20]

    Yiqin Deng, Haixia Zhang, Xianhao Chen, and Yuguang Fang. 2024. UA V-Assisted MEC with an Expandable Computing Resource Pool: Rethinking the UA V Deployment.IEEE Wireless Communications 31, 5 (Oct. 2024), 110–116

  21. [21]

    Yiqin Deng, Haixia Zhang, Xianhao Chen, and Yuguang Fang. 2024. UA V-Assisted Multi-Access Edge Computing With Altitude-Dependent Computing Power. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 23, 8 (Aug. 2024), 9404–9418. doi:10.1109/TWC.2024.3362375

  22. [22]

    Cole Dickerson, Ozgur Ozdemir, Mihail Sichitiu, and Ismail Guvenc. 2025. AERPA W Keysight N6841A RF Sensor UA V Localization Measurements with LOS/NLOS Information, July 2024. Dryad. doi:10.5061/dryad.vq83bk44h Dataset

  23. [23]

    Haichuan Ding, Yuguang Fang, Xiaoxia Huang, Miao Pan, Pan Li, and Savo Glisic. 2017. Cognitive Capacity Harvesting Networks: Architectural Evolution Towards Future Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19, 3 (2017), 1902–1923

  24. [24]

    Haichuan Ding, Chi Zhang, Ying Cai, and Yuguang Fang. 2018. Smart Cities on Wheels: A Newly Emerging Vehicular Cognitive Capability Harvesting Network for Data Transportation. IEEE Wireless Communications 25, 2 (2018), 160–169

  25. [25]

    Sheng, and Xi Zheng

    Wenyu Dong, Guangquan Xu, Shicheng Feng, Hongpeng Bai, Quan Z. Sheng, and Xi Zheng. 2026. Escorting the Confidentiality and Integrity of UA Vs: What Exactly Can Trusted Execution Environment Offer? ACM Computing Surveys 58, 3, Article 72 (2026), 35 pages. doi:10.1145/3763788

  26. [26]

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, German Ros, Felipe Codevilla, Antonio Lopez, and Vladlen Koltun. 2017. CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 78) . PMLR, 1–16. https://proceedings. mlr.press/v78/dosovitskiy17a.html

  27. [27]

    Dian Fan, Feifei Gao, Bo Ai, Gongpu Wang, Zhangdui Zhong, Yansha Deng, and Arumugam Nallanathan. 2019. Channel Estimation and Self- Positioning for UA V Swarm. IEEE Transactions on Communications 67, 11 (2019), 7994–8007

  28. [28]

    Zhengru Fang, Yanchao Deng, Guoliang Xue, and et al. 2025. PACP: Priority-Aware Collaborative Perception for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2025). doi:10.1109/TMC.2024.3377829 Early Access 2024; vol. 23, no. 12, 2025

  29. [29]

    Zhengru Fang, Zhenghao Liu, Jingjing Wang, Senkang Hu, Yu Guo, Yiqin Deng, and Yuguang Fang. 2025. Task-Oriented Communications for Visual Navigation with Edge-Aerial Collaboration. In Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)

  30. [30]

    Zhenyu Fu, Juan Liu, Yuyi Mao, Long Qu, Lingfu Xie, and Xijun Wang. 2025. Energy-Efficient UA V-Assisted Federated Learning: Trajectory Optimization, Device Scheduling, and Resource Management. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 22, 2 (April 2025), 974–988

  31. [31]

    Hui Gao, Ruohan Cao, Wenjun Xu, Caixia Yuan, and Hsiao-Hwa Chen. 2025. Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks With Task-Driven Connected Intelligence. IEEE Wireless Communications 32, 2 (April 2025), 254–261

  32. [32]

    Junhui Gao, Yan Pan, Qianru Wang, Wenzhe Hou, Yiqin Deng, Liangliang Jiang, and Yuguang Fang. 2026. TriDeliver: Cooperative Air-Ground Instant Delivery with UA Vs, Couriers, and Crowdsourced Ground Vehicles. arXiv:2604.09049 [cs.RO] https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09049 Manuscript submitted to ACM Collaborative Air-Ground SCCSI for LAE 33

  33. [33]

    Getu, Georges Kaddoum, and Mehdi Bennis

    Tilahun M. Getu, Georges Kaddoum, and Mehdi Bennis. 2024. Semantic Communication: A Survey on Research Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions. Proc. IEEE 112, 11 (Nov. 2024), 1649–1685

  34. [34]

    Jing Guo, Salman Durrani, Xiangyun Zhou, and Zesong Fei. 2024. Design and Performance Analysis of Cache-Enabled Multicast in UA V-Assisted Cellular Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications 72, 7 (July 2024), 4459–4475

  35. [35]

    Xiaoyu Guo, Xiaowei Song, Dan Zeng, Zhen Dong, Xiang Yu, Lu Liu, and Yuguang Fang. 2025. Integrated Energy-Efficient Planning and Manage- ment Framework for Autonomous Long-Endurance Flight of Hydrogen Fuel Cell/Battery Hybrid UA Vs. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (Jan. 2025). Early Access

  36. [36]

    Qiaojian Han, Haixia Zhang, Yueheng Li, Dongfeng Yuan, and Xiaoyan Ma. 2025. Physics Informed Digital Twin for RIS-Assisted Wireless Communication System. IEEE Wireless Communications 32, 3 (June 2025), 106–112

  37. [37]

    Shoufei Han, Xiaojing Liu, MengChu Zhou, Kun Zhu, Liang Zhao, Aiiad Albeshri, and Abdullah Abusorrah. 2024. Joint Association, Deployment and Flight Trajectory Optimization for Multi-UA V-Enabled Large-Scale Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 23, 12 (Dec. 2024), 13207–13221

  38. [38]

    Arash Heidari, Nima Jafari Navimipour, Mehmet Unal, and Guodao Zhang. 2023. Machine Learning Applications in Internet-of-Drones: Systematic Review, Recent Deployments, and Open Issues. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 12 (March 2023), 1–45

  39. [39]

    Yunhao Hou, Bochao Zou, Min Zhang, Ran Chen, Shangdong Yang, Yanmei Zhang, Junbao Zhuo, Siheng Chen, Jiansheng Chen, and Huimin Ma

  40. [40]

    AGC-Drive: A large-scale dataset for real-world aerial-ground collaboration in driving scenarios,

    AGC-Drive: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Aerial-Ground Collaboration in Driving Scenarios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16371 (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.16371

  41. [41]

    Gangqiang Hu, Donglin Zhu, Jiaying Shen, Jialing Hu, Jianmin Han, and Taiyong Li. 2024. Reliable Incentive Mechanisms for Federated Learning in Drone Companies’ Collaborative Training. Drones 8, 10 (2024), 567. doi:10.3390/drones8100567

  42. [42]

    Bang Huang, Eddine Youcef Belmekki, and Mohamed-Slim Alouini. 2026. High-Altitude Platforms in the Low-Altitude Economy: Bridging Com- munication, Computing, and Regulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19784 (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.19784

  43. [43]

    Yuhong Huang, Haiyu Ding, Weiyan Chen, Luting Kong, Wei Deng, Xin Li, Yang Liu, Guizhen Wang, and Liang Liu. 2025. Towards a Low-Altitude Aerial Intelligent Network: Vision, Challenges, and Key Technologies. China Communications 22, 9 (Sept. 2025), 1–21

  44. [44]

    Min Hui, Jian Chen, Long Yang, Lu Lv, Hai Jiang, and Naofal Al-Dhahir. 2024. UA V-Assisted Mobile Edge Computing: Optimal Design of UA V Altitude and Task Offloading. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 23, 10 (Oct. 2024), 13633–13647

  45. [45]

    Peng Jiang, Ming Li, Rang Liu, Wei Wang, and Qian Liu. 2025. Joint Waveform and Beamforming Design in RIS-ISAC Systems: A Model-Driven Learning Approach. IEEE Transactions on Communications 73, 8 (Aug. 2025), 6469–6483

  46. [46]

    Yihang Jiang, Xiaoyang Li, Guangxu Zhu, Hang Li, Jing Deng, Kaifeng Han, Chao Shen, Qingjiang Shi, and Rui Zhang. 2025. Integrated Sensing and Communication for Low Altitude Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine (2025). Early Access

  47. [47]

    Chanuka A. S. Hewa Kaluannakkage and Rajkumar Buyya. 2025. Incentive Based Federated Learning: Architectural Elements and Future Direc- tions. arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2510.14208v2

  48. [48]

    Ayshika Kapoor and Dheeraj Kumar. 2025. Federated Learning for Urban Sensing Systems: A Comprehensive Survey on Attacks, Defences, Incentive Mechanisms, and Applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 27, 2 (April 2025), 1293–1325

  49. [49]

    Pawan Kumar, Kunwar Pal, and Mahesh Govil. 2026. Comprehensive Review of Path Planning Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UA Vs). ACM Computing Surveys 58, 3, Article 73 (2026), 44 pages. doi:10.1145/3737280

  50. [50]

    Vincent Poor

    Joohyung Lee, Faranaksadat Solat, Tae Yeon Kim, and H. Vincent Poor. 2024. Federated Learning-Empowered Mobile Network Management for 5G and Beyond Networks: From Access to Core. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 26, 3 (2024), 2176–2212

  51. [51]

    Jian Li, Lan Zhang, Kaiping Xue, Yuguang Fang, and Qibin Sun. 2023. Secure Transmission by Leveraging Multiple Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces in MISO Systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 22, 4 (2023), 2387–2401

  52. [52]

    Lee Swindlehurst

    Peishi Li, Ming Li, Rang Liu, Qian Liu, and A. Lee Swindlehurst. 2025. MIMO-OFDM ISAC Waveform Design for Range-Doppler Sidelobe Sup- pression. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 24, 2 (Feb. 2025), 1001–1015

  53. [53]

    Xingyu Li, Wenzhe Zhang, Linfeng Liu, and Jia Xu. 2025. Exploring the Robustness: Hierarchical Federated Learning Framework for Object Detection of UA V Cluster.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 24, 10 (Oct. 2025), 9489–9505

  54. [54]

    Yongxiao Li, Feroz Khan, Manzoor Ahmed, Aized Amin Soofi, Wali Ullah Khan, Chandan Kumar Sheemar, Muhammad Asif, and Zhu Han. 2025. RIS-Based Physical Layer Security for Integrated Sensing and Communication: A Comprehensive Survey. (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.17721

  55. [55]

    Tianhao Liang, Nanchi Su, Yuqi Ping, Guangyu Lei, Xinglin Chen, Longyu Zhou, Tingting Zhang, Qinyu Zhang, and Tony Q. S. Quek. 2026. UA V Control and Communication Enabled Low-Altitude Economy: Challenges, Resilient Architecture and Co-Design Strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04044 (2026). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.04044

  56. [56]

    Yuemin Liu, Shuai Liu, Xin Liu, Zechen Liu, and Tariq S. Durrani. 2023. Sensing Fairness-Based Energy Efficiency Optimization for UA V-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 12, 10 (2023), 1702–1706

  57. [57]

    Zhiyan Liu, Xu Chen, Hai Wu, Zhanwei Wang, Xianhao Chen, Dusit Niyato, and Kaibin Huang. 2025. Integrated Sensing and Edge AI: Realizing Intelligent Perception in 6G. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (July 2025). Early Access

  58. [58]

    Zhiyan Liu and Kaibin Huang. 2025. Semantic-Relevance Based Sensor Selection for Edge-AI Empowered Sensing Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12785 (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.12785

  59. [59]

    Zhiyan Liu, Qiao Lan, and Kaibin Huang. 2025. Over-the-Air Fusion of Sparse Spatial Features for Integrated Sensing and Edge AI over Broadband Channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 24, 4 (2025), 2999–3013. doi:10.1109/TWC.2025.3527331 Manuscript submitted to ACM 34 Y. Deng et al

  60. [60]

    Mingquan Lu, Zheng Yao, Yuan Shen, Xingxing Li, and Zhipeng Wang. 2025. Space-Air-Ground Collaborative Positioning, Navigation and Timing Architecture and Key Technologies for Low-Altitude Economy. China Communications 22, 9 (Sept. 2025), 48–80

  61. [61]

    Yanan Ma, Yiqin Deng, Zhengru Fang, Longzhi Yuan, Xianhao Chen, and Yuguang Fang. 2026. RAISE: Optimizing RIS Placement to Maximize Task Throughput in Multi-Server Vehicular Edge Computing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 25 (2026), 9185–9199

  62. [62]

    Yanan Ma, Zhengru Fang, Yihang Tao, Yu Guo, Yiqin Deng, Xianhao Chen, and Yuguang Fang. 2026. Birdcast: Interest-Aware BEV Multicasting for Infrastructure-Assisted Collaborative Perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00701 (2026)

  63. [63]

    Sichitiu, and Brian Floyd

    Vuk Marojevic, Ismail Guvenc, Rudra Dutta, Mihail L. Sichitiu, and Brian Floyd. 2020. Advanced Wireless for Unmanned Aerial Systems: 5G Standardization, Research Challenges, and AERPA W Experimentation Platform. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 15, 2 (2020), 22–30

  64. [64]

    Siqi Meng, Shaohua Wu, Jiaming Zhang, Junlan Cheng, Haibo Zhou, and Qinyu Zhang. 2025. Semantics-Empowered Space-Air-Ground-Sea Integrated Network: New Paradigm, Frameworks, and Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 27, 1 (Feb. 2025), 140–183

  65. [65]

    Silvia Mura, Dario Tagliaferri, Marouan Mizmizi, Umberto Spagnolini, and Athina Petropulu. 2025. Optimized Waveform Design for OFDM-Based ISAC Systems Under Limited Resource Occupancy. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 24, 6 (June 2025), 5241–5254

  66. [66]

    Nguyen, Kexuan Sun, Duc To, Quoc-Tuan Vien, and Tuan Anh Le

    Huan X. Nguyen, Kexuan Sun, Duc To, Quoc-Tuan Vien, and Tuan Anh Le. 2025. Digital Twin for O-RAN Toward 6G. IEEE Communications Magazine 63, 3 (2025), 174–181

  67. [67]

    Zhaolong Ning, Hao Hu, Xiaojie Wang, Lei Guo, Song Guo, Guoyin Wang, and Xinbo Gao. 2023. Mobile Edge Computing and Machine Learning in the Internet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys 56, 1 (Aug. 2023), 1–31

  68. [68]

    O-RAN next Generation Research Group (nGRG). 2024. Research Report on Digital Twin RAN Use Cases . Technical Report RR-2024-07. O-RAN Alliance. https://mediastorage.o-ran.org/ngrg-rr/nGRG%20RS01%20Digital%20Twin%20Use%20Case%20Research%20Report%20v1.0.pdf Release date: 2024.05

  69. [69]

    Sicong Peng, Bin Li, Lei Liu, Zesong Fei, and Dusit Niyato. 2025. Trajectory Design and Resource Allocation for Multi-UA V-Assisted Sensing, Communication, and Edge Computing Integration. IEEE Transactions on Communications 73, 4 (Jan. 2025), 2847–2861

  70. [70]

    Quoc-Viet Pham, Ming Zeng, Thien Huynh-The, Zhu Han, and Won-Joo Hwang. 2022. Aerial Access Networks for Federated Learning: Applica- tions and Challenges. IEEE Network 36, 3 (May 2022), 159–166

  71. [71]

    Quan, Pubudu N

    Minh K. Quan, Pubudu N. Pathirana, Mayuri Wijayasundara, Sujeeva Setunge, Dinh C. Nguyen, Christopher G. Brinton, David J. Love, and H. Vincent Poor. 2025. Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2025). Early Access

  72. [72]

    Kathiroli Raja, Kottilingam Kottursamy, Vishal Ravichandran, Sivaganesh Balaganesh, Kapal Dev, Lewis Nkenyereye, and Gunasekaran Raja. 2025. An Efficient 6G Federated Learning-Enabled Energy-Efficient Scheme for UA V Deployment. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 74, 2 (Feb. 2025), 2057–2066

  73. [73]

    Zajkowski, Magreth Mushi, Ozgur Ozdemir, Ram Asokan, Ismail Guvenc, Mihail L

    Amir Hossein Fahim Raouf, Donggu Lee, Mushfiqur Rahman, Saad Masrur, Gautham Reddy, Cole Dickerson, Md Sharif Hossen, Sergio Vargas Villar, Anıl Gürses, Simran Singh, Sung Joon Maeng, Martins Ezuma, Christopher Roberts, Mohamed Rabeek Sarbudeen, Thomas J. Zajkowski, Magreth Mushi, Ozgur Ozdemir, Ram Asokan, Ismail Guvenc, Mihail L. Sichitiu, and Rudra Dut...

  74. [74]

    Viet, and Raju Shrestha

    Daniel Romero, Pham Q. Viet, and Raju Shrestha. 2024. Aerial Base Station Placement via Propagation Radio Maps. IEEE Transactions on Com- munications 72, 9 (Sept. 2024), 5349–5364

  75. [75]

    Shital Shah, Debadeepta Dey, Chris Lovett, and Ashish Kapoor. 2017. Airsim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles. In Field and service robotics: Results of the 11th international conference . Springer, 621–635

  76. [76]

    Arnolnt Spyros, Periklis Chatzimisios, Dimitrios Kavallieros, Theodora Tsikrika, Stefanos Vrochidis, and Yiannis Kompatsiaris. 2026. A Compre- hensive Survey and Taxonomy of Cybersecurity Challenges and Proactive Measures for IoD. ACM Computing Surveys 58, 7 (2026), 1–35

  77. [77]

    Geng Sun, Yixian Wang, Zemin Sun, Qingqing Wu, Jiawen Kang, Dusit Niyato, and Victor C. M. Leung. 2024. Multi-Objective Optimization for Multi-UA V-Assisted Mobile Edge Computing.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 23, 12 (Dec. 2024), 14803–14820

  78. [78]

    Yan Sun, Yinqiu Liu, Shaoyong Guo, Ruichen Zhang, Jiacheng Wang, Xuesong Qiu, Geng Sun, Weifeng Gong, Dusit Niyato, and Qihui Wu. 2025. A Synergy of Computing Power Networks and Low-Altitude Economy Intelligent Communications: Challenges, Design Principles, and Research Directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23810 (2025). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.23810

  79. [79]

    Yao Tang, Guangxu Zhu, Wei Xu, Man Hon Cheung, Tat-Ming Lok, and Shuguang Cui. 2025. Integrated Sensing, Computation, and Communica- tion for UA V-Assisted Federated Edge Learning. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 24, 4 (April 2025), 2647–2662

  80. [80]

    Akbar Telikani, Arupa Sarkar, Bo Du, Fendy Santoso, Jun Shen, Jun Yan, Jianming Yong, and Emily Yap. 2025. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Aided Intelligent Transportation Systems: Vision, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (Jan. 2025). Early Access

Showing first 80 references.