pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23002 · v1 · pith:OAIXO32Onew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

First-Principles Explanation of the Drift Configuration Dependence of the Radial Electric Field and High-Confinement Access in Tokamaks

B. J. Frei , R. Bilato , O. Grover , W. Zholobenko , C. Angioni , M. Bergmann , P. Ulbl , F. Jenko
show 1 more author
the ASDEX Upgrade Team
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 05:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords tokamakH-moderadial electric fieldgyrokinetic simulationdrift configurationturbulenceplasma confinementedge turbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Turbulence-driven poloidal flows generate a deeper radial electric field well in favorable tokamak drift configurations through enhanced nonlinear energy transfer.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the experimentally observed difference in H-mode power threshold between favorable and unfavorable drift configurations stems from configuration-dependent nonlinear dynamics in edge turbulence. Gyrokinetic simulations reveal stronger energy transfer from turbulence to mean poloidal flows in the favorable case, which self-consistently builds a deeper Er well and stronger shear that suppresses turbulence. The unfavorable case exhibits weaker transfer, a shallower well, and higher turbulence levels. This picture accounts for why high-confinement access occurs at lower power in one configuration.

Core claim

Using first-principles gyrokinetic simulations of edge and scrape-off-layer turbulence in ASDEX Upgrade, turbulence-driven poloidal flows generate this deeper Er well in the favorable configuration through enhanced nonlinear turbulence-mean flow energy transfer. This transfer is significantly weaker in the unfavorable case, yielding a shallower Er well, while turbulence intensity is simultaneously higher. Within the turbulence-flow shear suppression paradigm, the combination of stronger shear and reduced turbulence facilitates H-mode access in the favorable configuration.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear turbulence-mean flow energy transfer in full-f gyrokinetic simulations of edge and scrape-off layer turbulence

If this is right

  • Stronger shear from the deeper Er well suppresses turbulence more effectively in the favorable configuration.
  • The reduced turbulence intensity in the favorable case combines with the shear to enable H-mode transition at lower input power.
  • The self-consistent coupling among profiles, Er, flows, and turbulence sets the observed configuration dependence of the power threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the energy transfer asymmetry persists across different machines or parameter regimes, configuration choice could become a deliberate control knob for H-mode access.
  • Adding neutral particle or impurity dynamics to the same simulation framework would test whether the configuration dependence survives those additional effects.

Load-bearing premise

The gyrokinetic simulations accurately capture the nonlinear turbulence-mean flow energy transfer in the edge and scrape-off layer without significant missing physics or numerical artifacts that would alter the configuration dependence.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of measured or simulated nonlinear energy transfer rates between the two drift configurations that shows no significant difference would falsify the claimed mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23002 by B. J. Frei, C. Angioni, F. Jenko, M. Bergmann, O. Grover, P. Ulbl, R. Bilato, the ASDEX Upgrade Team, W. Zholobenko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: compares the outboard midplane (OMP) profiles (time and toroidally averaged) of ne and Ti obtained from GENE-X with experimental measurements [5]. Overall, good agreement with experiments is observed in both configurations, albeit with slightly lower Ti gradients near the separatrix. Most importantly, the simulations reproduce the experimental finding that the profiles are nearly insensitive to the ion ∇B … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Surface-integrated and time-averaged radial profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Radial profiles of the GAM amplitude ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The origin of the difference in the high-confinement (H-mode) power threshold between favorable and unfavorable drift configurations in tokamaks, experimentally linked to a deeper radial electric field (Er) well in the former, remains unresolved. Using first-principles gyrokinetic simulations of edge and scrape-off-layer turbulence in ASDEX Upgrade, we show that turbulence-driven poloidal flows generate this deeper Er well in the favorable configuration through enhanced nonlinear turbulence-mean flow energy transfer. This transfer is significantly weaker in the unfavorable case, yielding a shallower Er well, while turbulence intensity is simultaneously higher. Within the turbulence-flow shear suppression paradigm, the combination of stronger shear and reduced turbulence facilitates H-mode access in the favorable configuration. These results provide the first validated, self-consistent full-f gyrokinetic explanation of how drift configuration controls the nonlinear dynamics of profiles, Er, flows, and turbulence, thereby setting the H-mode power threshold.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that full-f gyrokinetic simulations of edge/SOL turbulence in ASDEX Upgrade demonstrate that turbulence-driven poloidal flows produce a deeper Er well in the favorable drift configuration via enhanced nonlinear turbulence-mean flow energy transfer; this transfer is weaker in the unfavorable case (with simultaneously higher turbulence intensity), thereby explaining the lower H-mode power threshold through shear suppression.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies the first self-consistent, first-principles account of how drift configuration sets the nonlinear profile-Er-flow-turbulence dynamics that control H-mode access, directly relevant to tokamak optimization and ITER scenario planning.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (simulation-results paragraph): the central claim that the configuration dependence of the Er well and H-mode threshold arises purely from the gyrokinetic model's nonlinear energy transfer requires explicit demonstration that omitted physics (neutral recycling, impurity radiation, SOL boundary conditions) do not differentially affect poloidal-flow drive or damping between the two geometries; without such checks or sensitivity tests the reported difference remains conditional on simulation completeness.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (simulation-results paragraph): the manuscript reports that the energy transfer 'is significantly weaker' in the unfavorable case, yet provides neither quantitative values, error bars, nor statistical significance for the difference; this quantitative gap prevents assessment of whether the effect is large enough to explain the observed threshold disparity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of model limitations and quantitative presentation. We address each point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (simulation-results paragraph): the central claim that the configuration dependence of the Er well and H-mode threshold arises purely from the gyrokinetic model's nonlinear energy transfer requires explicit demonstration that omitted physics (neutral recycling, impurity radiation, SOL boundary conditions) do not differentially affect poloidal-flow drive or damping between the two geometries; without such checks or sensitivity tests the reported difference remains conditional on simulation completeness.

    Authors: We agree that the simulations employ a reduced model omitting neutral recycling, impurity radiation, and certain SOL boundary effects. The configuration dependence we report is therefore demonstrated within this consistent model applied identically to both geometries. We will revise the abstract to qualify the claim as holding 'within the gyrokinetic model employed' and add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that (i) explicitly lists the omitted physics, (ii) cites prior work indicating these effects do not reverse the sign of the poloidal-flow drive difference, and (iii) states that comprehensive sensitivity tests with all physics included lie beyond the present computational scope. This makes the conditional nature of the result transparent without requiring new simulations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (simulation-results paragraph): the manuscript reports that the energy transfer 'is significantly weaker' in the unfavorable case, yet provides neither quantitative values, error bars, nor statistical significance for the difference; this quantitative gap prevents assessment of whether the effect is large enough to explain the observed threshold disparity.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. In the revised manuscript we will replace the qualitative statement with explicit numerical values of the turbulence-to-mean-flow energy transfer rates (in appropriate units) for both configurations, together with standard-error estimates obtained from the simulation time series. These numbers, and a brief statement of their statistical significance, will also appear in the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in simulation-derived mechanism

full rationale

The paper's central result—that turbulence-driven poloidal flows produce a deeper Er well via enhanced nonlinear energy transfer in the favorable drift configuration—emerges directly as an output of the full-f gyrokinetic simulations described in the abstract. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the configuration dependence is reported as a model prediction rather than an input. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the simulation framework itself, consistent with the default expectation for first-principles numerical work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of gyrokinetic theory for edge turbulence; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard gyrokinetic ordering and closure assumptions hold for edge and scrape-off-layer turbulence
    The simulations rely on established gyrokinetic approximations without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5730 in / 1311 out tokens · 30058 ms · 2026-05-25T05:10:19.153884+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ryter, R

    F. Ryter, R. Granetz, M. Greenwald, O. Kardaun, A. Kus, U. Stroth, J. Kollermeyer, S. Fielding, M. Val- ovic, J. DeBoo,et al., H mode power threshold database for iter, Nuclear Fusion36, 1217 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    McKee, P

    G. McKee, P. Gohil, D. Schlossberg, J. Boedo, K. Bur- rell, J. Degrassie, R. Groebner, R. Moyer, C. Petty, T. Rhodes,et al., Dependence of the l-to h-mode power threshold on toroidal rotation and the link to edge tur- bulence dynamics, Nuclear Fusion49, 115016 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Ryter, R

    F. Ryter, R. Fischer, J. Fuchs, T. Happel, R. McDer- mott, E. Viezzer, E. Wolfrum, L. B. Orte, M. Bernert, A. Burckhart,et al., I-mode studies at asdex upgrade: Li and ih transitions, pedestal and confinement properties, Nuclear Fusion57, 016004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Cziegler, A

    I. Cziegler, A. Hubbard, J. Hughes, J. Terry, and G. Ty- nan, Turbulence nonlinearities shed light on geometric asymmetry in tokamak confinement transitions, Physical review letters118, 105003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Plank, D

    U. Plank, D. Brida, G. Conway, T. Happel, A. Hubbard, T. P¨ utterich, C. Angioni, M. Cavedon, R. Dux, T. Eich, et al., Experimental study of the edge radial electric field in different drift configurations and its role in the ac- cess to h-mode at asdex upgrade, Physics of Plasmas30 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Carlstrom, R

    T. Carlstrom, R. Groebner, C. Fenzi, G. McKee, R. Moyer, and T. Rhodes, Evidence for the role of ve- locity shear on the lh transition in diii-d, Plasma physics and controlled fusion44, A333 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Schirmer, G

    J. Schirmer, G. Conway, H. Zohm, W. Suttrop, A. U. Team,et al., The radial electric field and its associated shear in the asdex upgrade tokamak, Nuclear fusion46, S780 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Vermare, P

    L. Vermare, P. Hennequin, C. Honor´ e, M. Peret, G. Dif- Pradalier, X. Garbet, J. Gunn, C. Bourdelle, F. Clairet, J. Morales,et al., Formation of the radial electric field profile in the west tokamak, Nuclear Fusion62, 026002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Z. Yan, G. McKee, L. Schmitz, P. Gohil, S. Haskey, and D.-D. team, Turbulence characteristics and flow dynam- ics impacts on the H-mode transition in favourable mag- netic geometry with lower power threshold, Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society A381, 20210240 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Plank, R

    U. Plank, R. McDermott, G. Birkenmeier, N. Bonanomi, M. Cavedon, G. Conway, T. Eich, M. Griener, O. Grover, P. Schneider,et al., Overview of l-to h-mode transition experiments at asdex upgrade, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion65, 014001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Versloot, P

    T. Versloot, P. De Vries, C. Giroud, M. Brix, M. Von Hellermann, P. Lomas, D. Moulton, M. O’Mullane, I. Nunes, A. Salmi,et al., Momen- tum losses by charge exchange with neutral particles in h-mode discharges at jet, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion53, 065017 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    R. W. Brzozowski, F. Jenko, R. Bilato, M. Cavedon, A. U. Team,et al., A geometric model of ion orbit loss under the influence of a radial electric field, Physics of Plasmas26(2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    H. Zhu, T. Stoltzfus-Dueck, R. Hager, S. Ku, and C.-S. Chang, Effects of collisional ion orbit loss on tokamak radial electric field and toroidal rotation in an l-mode plasma, Nuclear Fusion63, 066009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    LaBombard, J

    B. LaBombard, J. Rice, A. Hubbard, J. Hughes, M. Greenwald, R. Granetz, J. Irby, Y. Lin, B. Lipschultz, E. Marmar,et al., Transport-driven scrape-off layer flows and the x-point dependence of the LH power threshold 8 in Alcator C-Mod, Physics of plasmas12(2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Hidalgo, C

    C. Hidalgo, C. Silva, M. Pedrosa, E. S´ anchez, H. Fernan- des, and C. Varandas, Radial structure of reynolds stress in the plasma boundary of tokamak plasmas, Physical review letters83, 2203 (1999)

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. S. Hahm, Zonal flows in plasma — a review, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion47, R35 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Fedorczak, P

    N. Fedorczak, P. Diamond, G. Tynan, and P. Manz, Shear-induced reynolds stress at the edge of l-mode toka- mak plasmas, Nuclear Fusion52, 103013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Fedorczak, P

    N. Fedorczak, P. Ghendrih, P. Hennequin, G. Tynan, P. Diamond, and P. Manz, Dynamics of tilted eddies in a transversal flow at the edge of tokamak plasmas and the consequences for L-H transition, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion55, 124024 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Schmid, P

    B. Schmid, P. Manz, M. Ramisch, and U. Stroth, Spatio- temporal structure of turbulent reynolds stress zonal flow drive in 3d magnetic configuration, New Journal of Physics19, 055003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Grover, T

    O. Grover, T. Eich, P. Manz, W. Zholobenko, T. Happel, T. Body, U. Plank, P. Ulbl, A. U. Team,et al., Reduced model for h-mode sustainment in unfavorable drift con- figuration in asdex upgrade, Nuclear Fusion64, 056020 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    P. Manz, A. Stegmeir, B. Schmid, T. Ribeiro, G. Birken- meier, N. Fedorczak, S. Garland, K. Hallatschek, M. Ramisch, and B. Scott, Magnetic configuration ef- fects on the reynolds stress in the plasma edge, Physics of Plasmas25(2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Fischer, C

    R. Fischer, C. Fuchs, B. Kurzan, W. Suttrop, E. Wol- frum, and A. U. Team, Integrated data analysis of profile diagnostics at asdex upgrade, Fusion science and technol- ogy58, 675 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Peeters, Reduced charge state equations that describe pfirsch schl¨ uter impurity transport in tokamak plasma, Physics of Plasmas7, 268 (2000)

    A. Peeters, Reduced charge state equations that describe pfirsch schl¨ uter impurity transport in tokamak plasma, Physics of Plasmas7, 268 (2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Michels, A

    D. Michels, A. Stegmeir, P. Ulbl, D. Jarema, and F. Jenko, GENE-X: A full-f gyrokinetic turbulence code based on the flux-coordinate independent ap- proach,Computer Physics Communications, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107986 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    B. Frei, P. Ulbl, J. Trilaksono, and F. Jenko, Spectrally accelerated edge and scrape-off layer gyrokinetic turbu- lence simulations, Computer Physics Communications , 109817 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Y. B. Kim, P. H. Diamond, and R. J. Groebner, Neoclas- sical poloidal and toroidal rotation in tokamaks, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics3, 2050 (1991)

    work page 2050

  27. [27]

    Belli and J

    E. Belli and J. Candy, Kinetic calculation of neoclassi- cal transport including self-consistent electron and im- purity dynamics, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 50, 095010 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Dif-Pradalier, V

    G. Dif-Pradalier, V. Grandgirard, Y. Sarazin, X. Garbet, and P. Ghendrih, Interplay between gyrokinetic turbu- lence, flows, and collisions: Perspectives on transport and poloidal rotation, Physical Review Letters103, 065002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    R. D. Hazeltine and J. D. Meiss,Plasma confinement (Courier Corporation, 2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    B. J. Frei, P. Ulbl, C. Pitzal, W. Zholobenko, and F. Jenko, Turbulence and transport in spectrally accel- erated full-f gyrokinetic simulations, Nuclear Fusion65, 116026 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    G. D. Conway, A. I. Smolyakov, and T. Ido, Geodesic acoustic modes in magnetic confinement devices, Nuclear Fusion62, 013001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Bielajew, U

    R. Bielajew, U. Plank, G. Conway, A. Hubbard, P. Rodriguez-Fernandez, B. Vanovac, C. Yoo, A. White, A. U. Team,et al., Edge radiated temperature fluctua- tions across confinement regime transitions in favorable and unfavorable drift configurations at asdex upgrade, Nuclear Fusion63, 126022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Bonanomi, C

    N. Bonanomi, C. Angioni, G. Conway, T. Happel, U. Plank, P. Schneider, G. Staebler, A. U. Team, E. M. Team,et al., From l-mode to the l–h transition, experi- ments on asdex upgrade and related gyrokinetic simula- tions, Physics of Plasmas31(2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Favre, Equations des gaz turbulents compressibles, J

    A. Favre, Equations des gaz turbulents compressibles, J. de Mecanique4(1965)

    work page 1965

  35. [35]

    M. Held, M. Wiesenberger, R. Kube, and A. Kendl, Non- oberbeck–boussinesq zonal flow generation, Nuclear Fu- sion58, 104001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    P. Manz, M. Xu, N. Fedorczak, S. Thakur, and G. Ty- nan, Spatial redistribution of turbulent and mean kinetic energy, Physics of Plasmas19(2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Cavedon, T

    M. Cavedon, T. Happel, P. Hennequin, R. Dux, K. H¨ ofler, U. Plank, T. P¨ utterich, U. Stroth, E. Viezzer, E. Wolfrum,et al., The radial localization of the tran- sition from low to high confinement mode in the asdex upgrade tokamak, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66, 025011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Rien¨ acker, P

    S. Rien¨ acker, P. Hennequin, L. Vermare, C. Honor´ e, S. Coda, B. Labit, B. Vincent, Y. Wang, L. Frassinetti, O. Panico,et al., Survey of the edge radial electric field in l-mode tcv plasmas using doppler backscattering, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion67, 065003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Scott, The geodesic transfer effect on zonal flows in tokamak edge turbulence, Physics Letters A320, 53 (2003)

    B. Scott, The geodesic transfer effect on zonal flows in tokamak edge turbulence, Physics Letters A320, 53 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    B. D. Scott, Energetics of the interaction between elec- tromagnetic exb turbulence and zonal flows, New Journal of Physics7, 92 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Conway, C

    G. Conway, C. Angioni, F. Ryter, P. Sauter, J. Vicente, and A. U. Team), Mean and oscillating plasma flows and turbulence interactions across the l-h confinement tran- sition, Physical review letters106, 065001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Smolyakov, P

    A. Smolyakov, P. Diamond, and M. Medvedev, Role of ion diamagnetic effects in the generation of large scale flows in toroidal ion temperature gradient mode turbu- lence, Physics of Plasmas7, 3987 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Sarazin, G

    Y. Sarazin, G. Dif-Pradalier, X. Garbet, P. Ghendrih, A. Berger, C. Gillot, V. Grandgirard, K. Obrejan, R. Varennes, L. Vermare,et al., Key impact of phase dynamics and diamagnetic drive on reynolds stress in magnetic fusion plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion63, 064007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Diamond, Y.-M

    P. Diamond, Y.-M. Liang, B. Carreras, and P. Terry, Self- regulating shear flow turbulence: A paradigm for the l to h transition, Physical review letters72, 2565 (1994)

    work page 1994

  45. [45]

    P. Manz, T. Eich, and O. Grover, How turbulence sets boundaries for tokamak operation, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics9, 5 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Terry, Suppression of turbulence and transport by sheared flow, Reviews of Modern Physics72, 109 (2000)

    P. Terry, Suppression of turbulence and transport by sheared flow, Reviews of Modern Physics72, 109 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Sauter, T

    P. Sauter, T. P¨ utterich, F. Ryter, E. Viezzer, E. Wol- frum, G. Conway, R. Fischer, B. Kurzan, R. McDer- mott, S. Rathgeber,et al., L-to H-mode transitions at low 9 density in ASDEX Upgrade, Nuclear Fusion52, 012001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Cavedon, G

    M. Cavedon, G. Birkenmeier, T. P¨ utterich, F. Ryter, E. Viezzer, E. Wolfrum, R. Dux, T. Happel, P. Hen- nequin, U. Plank,et al., Connecting the global h-mode power threshold to the local radial electric field at asdex upgrade, Nuclear Fusion60, 066026 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Viezzer, T

    E. Viezzer, T. P¨ utterich, G. Conway, R. Dux, T. Happel, J. Fuchs, R. McDermott, F. Ryter, B. Sieglin, W. Sut- trop,et al., High-accuracy characterization of the edge radial electric field at asdex upgrade, Nuclear Fusion53, 053005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Viezzer, T

    E. Viezzer, T. P¨ utterich, R. McDermott, G. Conway, M. Cavedon, M. Dunne, R. Dux, E. Wolfrum, A. U. Team,et al., Parameter dependence of the radial electric field in the edge pedestal of hydrogen, deuterium and he- lium plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion56, 075018 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Stegmeir, M

    A. Stegmeir, M. E. Finkbeiner, C. Pitzal, J. Geiger, and F. Jenko, Grillix as unified fluid turbulence code for toka- maks and stellarators, Computer Physics Communica- tions318, 109874 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    T. S. Hahm, P. H. Diamond, and Z. Lin, Zonal flows in kinetic and extended-fluid models, Phys. Plasmas11, 1476 (2004)

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Y. Xia, Z. Lin, and T. S. Hahm, Gyrokinetic theory of coupled zonal radial electric fields and zonal flows, Phys. Plasmas21, 062118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    M. N. Rosenbluth and F. L. Hinton, Poloidal flow driven by ion-temperature-gradient turbulence in toka- maks, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 724 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    Winsor, J

    N. Winsor, J. L. Johnson, and J. M. Dawson, Geodesic acoustic waves in tokamak plasmas, Phys. Fluids11, 2448 (1968)

    work page 1968

  56. [56]

    Z. Qiu, L. Chen, and F. Zonca, Kinetic theory of geodesic acoustic modes in toroidal plasmas: a brief review, Plasma Science and Technology20, 094004 (2018)

    work page 2018